Ditemukan 178 data
49 — 246 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Lalu batas letaktanah PSDA yang masuk wilayah Kauman MangkangKulon Kecamatan Tugu Kota Semarang adalah sebelahbarat perkampungan, sebelah utara rel kereta api, sebelahselatan adalah jalan Desa Tegal Lirik (nama Jalan KyaiGilang II), sebelah timur juga saluran/irigasi;6.3.2 Sementara itu posisi antara tanah milik Nyonya Puanah(Para Penggugat) dengan tanah milik Dinas PSDA (baikyang di wilayah Wonosari maupun Mangkang Kulon) kuranglebin berjarak 300 m, dengan demikian tanah yangdisertipikatkan hak
atasnama Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Tingkat Jawa Tengah Cq DinasPekerjaan Umum;Bahwa dalil Para Penggugat posita 6.3.2 yang intinya menyebutkantanah milik Para Penggugat dan tanah milik PSDA berjarak + 300 m,dan dikaitkan dengan surat dari Pemerintah Kota Semarang Nomor590/22/VIII/2012 tanggal 4 Oktober 2012 telah dijelaskan bahwa tanahmilik Para Penggugat masihn C Desa, sedangkan milik Tergugat IlIntervensi sudah bersertipikat Hak Pakai Nomor 12 Desa MangkangKulon, Kelurahan Mangkang Kulon, Kecamatan
75 — 22
Bengkalis ;6.3.2.
Bahwa dalil Penggugat pada point 6.3dengan sub item (6.3.1 dan 6.3.2) adalahbenar sepanjang Penggugat menyebut danmengutip pasal pasal yang terdapat padaPeraturan Daerah Kab.
162 — 112
Lapisan tanah sangat lunak cukup tebal dari muka tanahsampai kedalaman 26 m ;6.3.2. Lapisan tanah dari muka tanah sampai 60 m merupakanHalaman 4 dari 16 hal. Putusan Nomor 401/PDT/2016/PT. DKI6.4.6.5.6.6.lapisan lempung abuabu;6.3.3. Tidak ditemukan lapisan tanah keras;6.3.4. Daya dukung Vertikal, Horizontal sangat rendah serta sangatmempunyai potensi penurunan konsolidasi yang sangat besar;6.3.5.
99 — 61 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):Halaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government
In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty
Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26(4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all ofthe percentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VIof this CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty
52 — 14
Zulham Effendi bin Amril Hasan (lakilaki);6.3.2. Hendra Effendi bin Amril Hasan (lakilaki);6.3.3. Aprinal Effendi binAmril Hasan (lakilaki);6.3.4. Elsa Fitri Ramadhani binti Amril Hasan (perempuan);6.3.5.
50 — 22
Haryudi (lakilaki, lahir di Jakarta 25 September1963).6.3.2. Hendrayana (lakilaki, lahir di Jakarta 15 Januari1966).6.3.3. Lies Sulistiyasari ( perempuan, lahir di Jakarta 14Juli 1968).6.3.4. Adin Haryadinata (lakilaki, lahir di Jakarta 2 April1975).6.3.5. Ade Suhartiningrum (perempuan, lahir di Jakarta 30September 1976).6.3.6. Lisa Megasari ( perempuan, lahir di di Jakarta 15Juni 1979),6.4.
34 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
. =2/3x harta bawaan (poin 5.1) + radd = 70,83%;6.3.2. =2/3x Y2 harta bersama (poin 5.2) + radd = 35,42%;Hal. 16 dari 18 hal. Put. No. 39 K/AG/20107. Menghukum Tergugat untuk menyerahkan kepada Penggugat, turutTergugat dan II bahagian yang menjadi hak masingmasing sebagaimanatersebut pada diktum angka 6.2 dan 6.3 putusan ini;8. Menghukum Tergugat membayar uang paksa Rp 1.000.000, (satu jutarupiah) perhari setiap kali Tergugat lalai dalam melaksanakan isi putusan ini;9.
279 — 241 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty
Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26(4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all ofthe percentages appearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI ofthis CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty
9 — 16
Bahwa Pemohon mengakui dekat dengan FULANAdan menjalin hubungan.6.3.2. Bahwa pada saat orang tua menyampaikan untukmemilin perempuan itu) atau. Termohon. Pemohonmenyampaikan bahwa tidak mau meninggalkan FULANA.6.3.3. Bahwa setelah pulang dari Minasa Upa, Pemohonmenyampaikan kepada Termohon akan menginap dan tinggalbersama orang tua untuk membahagiakan orang tua sehinggaPemohon menyiapkan pakaiannya. Dan ternyata Pemohonjarang dirumah orang tua Pemohon.7.
80 — 106 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Hanrozan Haznam (lakilaki);6.3.2. Mahdalisa Haznam (perempuan);6.3.3. Azinul Judi Adrian Haznam (lakilaki);6.4. Madoeretna Haznam, (perempuan) meninggal dunia tanggal 8 April1984. Semasa hidupnya menikah 2 (dua) kali. Pertama kali denganMoch. Amin pada tanggal 11 Oktober 1951 di Jakarta dan kemudianputus karena perceraian pada tanggal 16 September 1957 danmeninggalkan anak:6.4.1. Duardino Indramin (lakilaki);6.4.2. Durando Juniman Sjawali (lakilaki);Hal. 5 dari 18 hal. Put.
232 — 91 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionHalaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1831/B/PK/PJK/2017under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government
In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty
Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26 (4)of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of theHalaman 52 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1831/B/PK/PJK/201722.23.percentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI ofthis CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability
75 — 50 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSCversi terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty
Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26(4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all ofthe percentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VIof this CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty
252 — 197 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty
Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26 (4)of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of thepercentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI ofthis CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty
96 — 27
Rifgi Ananda/Tergugat Il;6.3.2. Nauval Hamdani/Tergugat III;Bahwa berdasarkan hukum faraid dan KHI, bagian hak warismasingmasing ahli waris almarhum Hasan Bukhari adalah:7.1. lbu/almahumah HJ. Asiyah Zaenab, mendapat 1/6 bagian,asal masalah 48, sehingga hak bagiannya menjadi 8/48bagian;7.2. Isteri/Maemanah. S.Ag,/Tergugat I, mendapat 1/8 bagian,asal masalah 48, sehingga hak bagiannya menjadi 6/48bagian;7.3.
32 — 15 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Candrawati binti Amaq Candra (anak perempuan),meninggal dunia dalam keadaan beragama Hindu untuk ituterhijab untuk mendapatkan warisan;6.3.2. Suminahbinti Amaq Candra, (anak perempuan)memperoleh 1/3 bagian dari bagian Arya, telah meninggaldunia maka bagiannya jatuh kepada ahli warisnya:6.3.2.1.Nursam (Suami) memperoleh 1/4 bagian Suminah;Hal. 22 dari 42 hal. Put. No. 52 K/Ag/20156.4.6.5.6.3.3.6.3.2.2. Nurhayati binti Nursam (anak perempuan)memperoleh 1/3 x 2/3 bagian;6.3.2.3.
Candrawati binti Amagq Candra (anak perempuan),meninggal dunia dalam keadaan beragama Hindu untukitu terhalang untuk mendapatkan warisan ;6.3.2. Suminah binti Amaq Candra, (anak perempuan)memperoleh 1/3 bagian dari bagian Arya alias AmaqCandra, telah meninggal dunia maka bagiannya jatuhkepada ahli warisnya:Hal. 29 dari 42 hal. Put. No. 52 K/Ag/20156.4.6.5.6.3.3.6.3.2.1. Nursam (Suami) memperoleh 1/4 bagianSuminah;6.3.2.2.
51 — 16
Lakilaki (saudara kandung almarhum) ;PENGGUGAT 1, Perempuan (saudara kandung almarhum) ;PENGGUGAT 2, Perempuan (saudara kandung almarhum) ;Adalah ahli waris dari almarhum ANAK 3 ;1.Meletakkan Sita Jaminan (Conservatoir beslag) atas hartatersebut pada poin 6.2, 6.3.6 dan poin 7.7.1.2 dan 3 ;Menyatakan sita jaminan yang diletakkan tersebut sah danberharga ;Menyatakan seluruh harta kekayaan yang diperoleh selamaperkawinan antara almarhum ANAK 3 dan XXXXX sebagaimanyang tersebut pada poin 6.2, 6.3.1, 6.3.2
Penggugat juga meminta agarharta brupa sebuah rumah permanen (posita 6.2), juga harta berupa uang duka (posita 6.3.1),Uang Taspen (posita 6.3.2), gaji terusan (posita 6.3.3), uang pensiunan bulanan (posita 6.3.4),premi asuransi (posita 6.3.5), dan perabot rumah tangga (posita 6.3.6) ditetapkan sebagai hartabersama yang diperoleh selama perkawinan almarhum ANAK 3 dan TERGUGAT, kemudianditetapkan bagian Tergugat serta ahli waris lainnya ;Menimbang, bahwa di depan persidangan Tergugat telah memberikan
30 — 29 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Bahwa terdapat pindah buku dari rekening pinjaman sebesarRp175 juta, Ro300 juta dan Rp1,45 milyar;6.3.2. Bahwa setoran tunai yang pada saat keberatan TermohonPeninjauan Kembali belum(semula Pemohon Banding)Halaman 9 dari 17 halaman. Putusan Nomor 42/B/PK/Pjk/2015menunjukkan bukti setoran dan pada saat rekon ditunjukkansetoran senilai Rp400 juta;6.3.3.
1.RUSNI ALIAS HJ. RUSNI BINTI H. ABDUL HAMID
2.SADRAN BIN H. ABDUL HAMID
3.SADRI BIN H. ABDUL HAMID
Tergugat:
1.SAHRAM BIN SADRUN
2.HARUN BIN H. ABDUL HAMID
3.SAHRIM BIN H. SAHARUDIN
4.SUHARNI BINTI H. SAHARUDIN
5.KARNIATI ALIAS HJ.KARNIATI BINTI H.SAHARUDIN
6.SITI ZAENAB BINTI H. SAHARUDIN
7.ERWIN SAHRONI BIN SAHRAM
Turut Tergugat:
1.LALU ABDUL HALIK BIN LALU SAHRAM
2.BAIQ SUMARDAYANI BINTI LALU SAHMAR
3.LALU HERMAN PELANI BIN LALU SAHRAM
4.LALU MUHAMAD FARHAN BIN LALU SAHRAM
5.LALU LALIOS HERI BIN LALU SAHRAM
6.MUHAMAD YUNUS BIN SAMIUN
7.AGUS SUJADI BIN SAMIUN
8.MASNAH BINTI SAMIUN
9.SUPARDI BIN SAMIUN
10.ZAENAL ABIDIN BIN SAMIUN
11.MARYAM BINTI SAMAIN
12.JAMIL JAUHARI BIN SAMAIN
13.SITI HADIJAH BINTI SAMAIN
14.JARIYAH BINTI SAMAIN
15.PUJI ASTUTI BINTI SAMAIN
16.LALU SAHMAR BIN MAMIQ SAHMAR
82 — 61
Saharudin, sebagai; Turut Tergugat 6.3.2. Sadrun Bin Amaq Samiun, yang telah meninggal dunia sekitar tahun1974, semasa hidupnya menikah dengan Saknah Als Inaq Sahrumdengan status cerai mati dari pernikahannya tersebut dikaruniai anak 1(satu) orang lakilaki yaitu :3.2.1. Sahram Bin Sadrun sebagai Tergugat 1.3.3. Rusni Als Hj. Rusni Binti Amaq Samiun sebagai Penggugat 1.3.4. Sadran Bin Amag Samiun sebagai Penggugat 2.3.5. Sadri Bin Amaq Samiun sebagai Penggugat 3.Hal. 7 dari 20 Hal.
129 — 59
No. 100/Pdt.G/2020/MS.Aceh= Rp.56.823.467,9443 (lima puluh enam juta delapan ratusdua puluh tiga ribu empat ratus enam puluh tujuh komasembilan ribu empat ratus empat puluh tiga rupiah);;6.3.2. Rahmad Muazir bin Nurian (anak lakilaki dari Saudara lakilaki kandung/Penggugat X) mendapat 1/6 xRp.340.940.807,666 = Rp.56.823.467,9443 (lima puluhenam juta delapan ratus dua puluh tiga ribu empat ratusenam puluh tujuh koma sembilan ribu empat ratus empatpuluh tiga rupiah);;6.3.3.
31 — 2 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Bahwa terdapat pindah buku dari rekening pinjaman sebesarRp175 juta, Rp300 juta dan Rp1,45 milyar;6.3.2. Bahwa setoran tunai yang pada saat keberatan TermohonPeninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding) belummenunjukkan bukti setoran dan pada saat rekon ditunjukkansetoran senilai Rp400 juta;6.3.3.