Ditemukan 372 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Register : 24-05-2016 — Putus : 24-08-2016 — Upload : 17-07-2019
Putusan PA TERNATE Nomor 242/Pdt.G/2016/PA.TTE Tanggal 24 Agustus 2016 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
15 — 4
15 — 4
pada kredit plus sehinggamotor tersebut ditarik dan garagara hal tersebut sehingga menimbulkanperselisihan dan pertengkaran antara Pemohon dan Termohon;> Bahwa saksi pernah 2 kali melihat dan mendengar antara Pemohon danTermohon bertengkar;> Bahwa saksi pernah mendengar bahwa Termohon telah berselingkuhdengan lakilaki lain tapi hanya cerita dari orangorang saja;> Bahwa saksi pernah menasehati Pemohon dan Termohon tetapi tidakberhasil;Putusan Nomor 0242/Pdt.G/2016/PA.TTE.hal. 6 dari 22 hal.a eo 25 thus
Putus : 13-12-2010 — Upload : 21-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 184/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 13 Desember 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
25 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
25 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 inclucies,for example :(1) Preparations in powder orliquid from used as infantfood or for dietetic purposesand consisting of milk towhich secondary ingredients(e.g., cereal, groats, yeast)have been added ;(2) Milk preparations obtainedby replacing one or moreconstituents of milk (e.g.
Putus : 04-01-2010 — Upload : 22-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 205 B/PK/PJK/2009 Tanggal 4 Januari 2010 — P.T. NESTLE INDONESIA, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
37 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
37 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, for example :1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infantfood or for dietetic purposes and consisting of milk towhichsecondary ingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast)have been added ;2) Milk preparations abtainec by replacing one or moreconstituents of milk (e.g., butyric fats) by anothersubstances :Bahwa berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to theHarmonized System tersebut di atas, sangat jelasditentukan bahwa suatu produk dapat diklasifikasikanHS No.1901.10.29.00
Putus : 30-12-2009 — Upload : 19-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 320/B/PK/PJK/2009.- Tanggal 30 Desember 2009 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
17 — 10 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
17 — 10 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, for example:(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infant food or for dieteticpurposes and consisting of milk to which secondary ingredients (e.g.,cereal, groats, yeast) have been added.(2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one or more constituents of milk(e. g., butyric fats) by another substances.Hal. 9 dari20 hal. Put.
Putus : 13-12-2010 — Upload : 19-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 246/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 13 Desember 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
17 — 7 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
17 — 7 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 inclucies, for example :(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infant food or fordietetic purposes and consisting of milk to which secondaryingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast) have been added ;(2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one or more constituents ofmilk (e.g., butyric fats) by another substances ;Berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized System tersebut diatas, sangat jelas ditentukan bahwa suatu produk dapat diklasifikasikanHS 1901.10.29.00
Putus : 02-12-2010 — Upload : 19-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 370 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 2 Desember 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
21 — 11 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
21 — 11 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, forexample:(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used asinfant food or for dietetic purposes and consisting ofmilk to which secondary ingredients (e.g., cereal,groats, yeast) have been added.(2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one or moreconstituents of milk (e. g., butyric fats) by anothersubstances.Berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized Systemtersebut di atas, sangat jelas ditentukan bahwa suatuproduk dapat diklasifilkasikan HS 1901.10.29.00apabila
Putus : 29-12-2009 — Upload : 21-10-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 347 /B/PK/PJK/2009 Tanggal 29 Desember 2009 — P.T. NESTLE INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
25 — 13 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
25 — 13 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, for example :(1). Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infant food for dieteticpurpose and consisting of milk to wich secondary ingredients (e.g.cereal, groats, yeast) have been added ;(2).
Putus : 04-02-2010 — Upload : 13-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 12 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 4 Februari 2010 — P.T. NESTLE INDONESIA, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
20 — 15 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
20 — 15 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, for example :1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infantfood or for dietetic purposes and consisting of milk towhich secondary ingredients (e.g., cereal, groats,yeast) have been added ;2) Milk preparations abtainec by replacing one or moreconstituents of milk (e.g., butyric fats) by anothersubstances ;Bahwa berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to theHarmonized System tersebut di atas, sangat jelasditentukan bahwa suatu produk dapat diklasifikasikanHS No.1901.10.29.00
Putus : 26-04-2010 — Upload : 03-08-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1169 K/Pdt/ 2009 Tanggal 26 April 2010 — PT. ASURANSI SINAR MAS CABANG BATAM ; PT. ORCHID MAS
132 — 94 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
132 — 94 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Dalam Laporan Akhir tersebut, PT.Mclarens Indonesia sebagai juru taksir yang dimaksudkan oleh Polismenyimpulkan bahwa tanggung jawab asuransi adalah :The Indemnity basis adjustment is thus :1. Buildings SGD 29,394.292. Machineries and equipment SGD 5,077.703. Installation and electronic equipment SGD 3,253.914. Furniture, curtain, carpet, etc. SGD 8,238.085. Others SGD 0.00.SGD 45,963.00 Hal. 12 dari 17 hal. Put.
Register : 08-12-2010 — Putus : 20-04-2011 — Upload : 12-12-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 633 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 20 April 2011 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. PERFEKTA NUSA;
32 — 13 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
32 — 13 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
money and theclassic way to evade VAT), requirement to give the name andaddress and reference of both seller and buyer, as well as theother statutory details should be strictly enforced; Liam Ebrill, Michael Keen, JeanPaul Bodin and VictoriaSummers, The Modern VAT, Washington, DC,International Monetary Fund, 2001, Halaman 20 21,menyatakan:Under the "invoice credit method, each trader chargesoutput tax at the specified rate on each sale and passes to thepurchaser an invoice showing the amount of tax thus
Thus, in principle, invoice could be crosschecked topick up any overstatement of credit entitlement; 4113.14.Bahwa dengan demikian, telah terbukti secara sah dan menyakinkanpertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Pajak dalam PutusanPengadilan Pajak Nomor Put.21980/PP/ M.X/99/2010 tanggal 08Februari 2010 telah mengabaikan asas hukum lex superior derogatelegi inferior dengan digunakannya Surat Direktur Jenderal PajakNomor 55/PJ.32/1996 tanggal 29 Maret 1996 yang jelas bertentangandengan Pasal 13
Putus : 04-08-2010 — Upload : 03-08-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 353 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 4 Agustus 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
26 — 10 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
26 — 10 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19,01 includes,for example :(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infant food or fordietetic purposes and consisting of milk to which secondaryingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast) have been added.(2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one or moreconstituents of milk (e.g., butyric fats) by another substances".Berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized Systemtersebut di atas, sangat jelas ditentukan bahwa suatu produk dapatdiklasifikasikan HS 1901.10.29.00 apabila
Register : 21-07-2020 — Putus : 28-07-2020 — Upload : 28-07-2020
Putusan PA PANYABUNGAN Nomor 132/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Pyb Tanggal 28 Juli 2020 — Pemohon melawan Termohon
17 — 6
17 — 6
eb Yom, sIisld ai thus WoW Y co jfigle b S55 SbBY Wuislas : gizy ab WSL Js rays Jour prpo cdl 51 clas Moyls ab yawal oi Gly Y wo.Mi jg>.3 03d WoYywgls yo Le Lojls GLalpls > cndi pio USl> ab i wold Yul 51 do Gije> glo Lilab INisld Ip YOu L Soi lou!Menimbang, bahwa menurut pendapat para Fagoha tersebut di atas,bahwa hukum nikah menjadi wajib jika:1. Adakeinginan yang kuat untuk menikah;2. Takut melakukan zina jika tidak menikah dan tidak mampu untuk berpuasasebagai pengganti nikah;3.
Putus : 15-02-2010 — Upload : 22-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 06/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 15 Februari 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
31 — 29 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
31 — 29 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, forexample :(1). Preparations in powder or liquid fromused as infant food or for dietetic purposesand consisting of milk to which secondaryingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast)have been added ;(2). Milk preparations obtained by replacingone or more constituents of milk (e.g.
Putus : 26-08-2010 — Upload : 19-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 329 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 26 Agustus 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
17 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
17 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01includes, for example:(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used asinfant food or for dietetic purposes and consistingof milk to which secondary ingredients (e.g.
Putus : 06-04-2011 — Upload : 21-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 80/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 6 April 2011 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
18 — 10 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
18 — 10 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 inclucies,for example :(1) Preparations in powder orliquid from used as infantfood or for dietetic purposesand consisting of milk towhich secondary ingredients(e.g., cereal, groats, yeast)have been added ;(2) Milk preparations obtainedby replacing one or moreconstituents of milk (e.g.
Putus : 11-02-2011 — Upload : 21-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 102/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 11 Februari 2011 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
12 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
12 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 inclucies, for example :Hal. 8 dari 19 hal. Put.
Putus : 04-02-2010 — Upload : 19-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 10/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 4 Februari 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, , ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
18 — 7 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
18 — 7 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, forexample :(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infant food or fordietetic purposes and consisting of milk to which secondaryingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast) have been added;(2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one or more constituentsof milk (e.g., butyric fats) by another substances";Berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized System tersebut diatas, sangat jelas ditentukan bahwa suatu. produk dapatdiklasifikasikan HS 1901.10.29.00,
Putus : 26-04-2010 — Upload : 03-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 36 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 26 April 2010 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
17 — 6 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
17 — 6 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 includes, for example :1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used as infant food or fordietic purposes and consisting of milk to which secondaryingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast) have been added.2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one or more constituents ofmilk (e.g., butyric fats) by another substances.Berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized System tersebut di atas,sangat jelas ditentukan bahwa suatu produk dapat diklasifikasikan HS 1901.10.29.00 apabila
Putus : 29-12-2009 — Upload : 03-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 369 B/PK/PJK/2009 Tanggal 29 Desember 2009 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
17 — 6 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
17 — 6 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Thus heading 19.01 inclucies, for example :Hal. 8 dari 19 hal. Put.
Register : 06-02-2018 — Putus : 20-02-2018 — Upload : 23-04-2018
Putusan PT AMBON Nomor 8/Pid.Sus /2018/PT AMB Tanggal 20 Februari 2018 — USMAN NGAJA Alias USKEN;
121 — 53
121 — 53
Dalampandangan Utilitarian bahwa Punishment is Justified either to makethe majority secure and thus happy or to maximize rights protection orboth (Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L.