Ditemukan 265 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 21-09-2016 — Putus : 21-10-2016 — Upload : 22-02-2017
Putusan PN TARAKAN Nomor 16/Pid.Sus-PRK/2016/PN TAR
Tanggal 21 Oktober 2016 — JONEL SALAMANES
14637
  • The coastal State may, in the exercise of its sovereign rights to explore,exploit, conserve and manage the living resources in the exclusiveeconomic zone, take such measures, including boarding, inspection,arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensurecompliance with the laws and regulations adopted by it in conformity withthis Convention.. Arrested vessels and their crews shall be promptly released upon theposting of reasonable bond or other security..
Register : 31-03-2015 — Putus : 13-05-2015 — Upload : 21-05-2015
Putusan PN REMBANG Nomor 30/Pid.B/2015/PN Rbg
Tanggal 13 Mei 2015 — HALIM PINANTO Als YONG Bin (Alm) MARDJUKI;
368
  • B/2015/PN.RBg INP 1 YOOUUY, LOalU JUla lillid 1aAlUys UCidpPall PULUL UCldVall 11UU LUP Tall), 1 odtuy UUdIIHP merk SAMSUNG warna coklat silver dengan sincard : 081328338990, (satu) bukumerk Exercise berisi rekap pasangan judi togel jenis Singapura dan Hongkong, 5 (lima)buah bolpoint untuk proses penyidikan lebih lanjut;Perbuatan terdakwa sebagaimana diatur dan diancam pidana dalam pasal 303 ayat (1)ke2 KUHP jo UU Nomor 7 Tahun 1974 tentang Penertiban Perjudian.
Register : 16-10-2020 — Putus : 15-07-2021 — Upload : 02-08-2021
Putusan PN BANDUNG Nomor 429/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bdg
Tanggal 15 Juli 2021 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
22751
  • ProgramForeign Endorsement mengenai yang telah dijalani oleh PENGGUGAT dimanaHalaman 5 dari 132 Putusan Sela Nomor 429/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bdg11.ada beberapa yang PENGGUGAT bantah mengenai program ForeignEndorsement yang telah dijalankan sebagai berikut: Bukti P21; (Poin 9halaman 6 pada gugatan sebelumnya menjadi poin 10 halaman 7 dan isi positatelah direvisi pada poin 10 angka 4 dan 5 serta dihilangkan poin 10 dan 6)1) Bahwa benar pada tanggal 4 September 2018 PENGGUGATmelaksanakan jam terbang simulator ke 1, exercise
    Koestinarto,2) Bahwa tidak benar pada tanggal 5 September 2018 PENGGUGATmelaksanakan jam terbang simulator ke 2, exercise Familiarization 02bersama Capt. Koestinarto, akan tetapi PENGGUGAT melaksanakan jamterbang simulator ke 2, exercise Familiarization 02 bersama Capt. RiskyFadila;3) Bahwa benar pada tanggal 6 September 2018 PENGGUGATmelaksanakan jam terbang simulator ke 3, exercise Familiarization 03bersama Capt.
    PENGGUGAT mengikuti simulator ke 4 dan ke 5 di hari yang sama;5) Bahwa tidak benar PENGGUGAT melaksanakan jam terbang simulator ke5, exercise Familiarization 04 bersama Capt. Risky Fadila, akan tetapiPENGGUGAT melaksanakan jam terbang simulator ke 5, exerciseFamiliarization 04 bersama Capt.
    Bahwa pada tanggal 13 September 2019, PENGGUGAT dijadwalkan jamterbang ke14 dengan agenda Exercise ReCheckride, bersama Capt. WinWarsono dari pihak TERGUGAT III di Bandara Husein Sastranegara kotaBandung dinyatakan hasil TIDAK LULUS/RECHECK.Bahwa PENGGUGAT menyangkal dan mempertanyakan hasil Rechecktersebut, dikarenakan faktanya adalah: (Poin 30 halaman 15 pada gugatansebelumnya menjadi Poin 33 halaman 1617 dan telah dilakukan perubahanposita pada poin tersebut)a.
    Bahwa pada tanggal 5 September 2018, Tergugat telah menjadwalkanPenggugat mengikuti program simulator kedua, exercise Familiarization02 bersama Capt. Risky Fadila, namun pada realisasinya Penggugatmengikuti program simulator tersebut bersama instruktur (Capt.Halaman 48 dari 132 Putusan Sela Nomor 429/Pdt.G/2020/PN BdgKoestinarto) selama 1 jam. Berarti jadwal tersebut terlaksana dan sudahditerima oleh Penggugat;c.
Register : 22-10-2012 — Putus : 12-11-2012 — Upload : 21-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 51/PKPU/2012/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST
Tanggal 12 Nopember 2012 — GRAMERCY DISTRESSED DEBT MASTER FUND, CS >< PT. BUANA LISTYA TAMA, Tbk.
321117
  • tidak wajib, atau Pemegang minimal memiliki 25%dalam jumlah pokok Surat Utang kemudian beredar dapat menyatakan semuaSurat Utang yang akan jatuh tempo dan harus segera dilunasi.17.Bahwa kemudian Pasal 7.01 huruf (a) Indenture mengatur mengenai tugas dankewajiban dari Trustee sebagaimana dikutip berikut ini :ff an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, the Trustee willexercise such of the rights and powers vested in it by this Indenture, anduse the same degree of care and skill in its exercise
    , as a prudent personwould exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of such personsown affairs.Terjemahan resmi dalam bahasa Indonesia :Jika suatu kondisi Wanprestasi telah terjadi dan terus, Waliamanat akanmelaksanakan seperti hak dan kekuasaan diberikan di dalamnya denganIndentur ini, dan menggunakan tingkat yang sama perawatan dan keterampilandalam pelaksanaannya, sebagai orang yang bijaksana akan melaksanakanHal.14 Putusan No.51/PKPU/2012/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PSTatau menggunakan dalam situasi
Putus : 29-10-2015 — Upload : 11-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 772/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2015 — PT RIGUNAS AGRI UTAMA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
12472 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Human rights seek toprotectindividuals especially against the exercise of public power.Taxation, on the other hand, is arguably the most visible, persistent andalmost universal interference with ownership.
    The right to protection, orpeaceful enjoyment, of ones possessions is wellknown human right.Furthermore, taxation generally and tax administration in particular,provide fertile ground for conflict between the exercise of public power,on the one hand, and the need to respect the rights of individual(including corporate) taxpayers on the other hand;(Terjemahan bebas :Konsep perlindungan hakhak wajib pajakmerupakan salah satu fungsi dalam lingkup konsep hak asasimanusia.....dak asasi manusia bertujuan
Register : 10-05-2016 — Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 02-03-2017
Putusan PT JAMBI Nomor 7/PID.SUS-TPK/2016/PT.JMB
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — Dr. H. ACHMAD AGUS FAURIZA, MPH
17588
  • Shoulder Wheel Exercise 1 116.191.875, 116.191.875, Total 9.920.707.165, Bahwa pada bulan Agustus tahun 2010 Terdakwa Dr. H.
    (USG) 1.317.840.750.Orthopedi instrument7. 1 574.712.500,Set 574.712.500, Central Oxygen8. 1 1.092.453.500,1.092.453.500, Stress Stest System9. 1 1.221 .389.000.W/Treadmill 1.221.389.000, Suction Unit10. 1 41.979.000.41.979.000, Ultrasound Therapy 11. 1 112.443.750,112.443.750,Shoulder Wheel12. 1 116.191.875,Exercise 116.191.875,Total 9.920.707.165, Maka jumlah HPS sebesar Rp.9.920.707.165, (Sembilan milyarSembilan ratus dua puluh juta tujuh ratus tujuh ribu seratus enam puluhlima rupiah), kKemudian
Putus : 22-02-2017 — Upload : 08-08-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3785 K/PDT/2016
Tanggal 22 Februari 2017 — I MADE MANDERA PUTRA VS I MADE DAYUH
5741 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., M.H.Panitera Pengganti,Ttd/.Susi Saptati, S.H, M.H.Biaya Kasasi:To: BL ES EU sree es exercise Rp 6.000,002.RedakSl.............0 Rp 5.000,003. Administrasi Kasasi...... Rp489.000,00 +Jumlah ....... cece eee Rp500.000,00Untuk SalinanMahkamah Agung R.Ia.n. Panitera,Panitera Muda PerdataPRIM HARYADI, S.H., M.H.NIP.19630325 198803 1 001Halaman 23 dari 23 hal. Put. Nomor 3785 K/Padt./2016
Register : 21-05-2018 — Putus : 19-11-2018 — Upload : 12-06-2019
Putusan PN SINGARAJA Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2018/PN Sgr
Tanggal 19 Nopember 2018 — Penggugat:
Perseroan Terbatas nabatindah Sejahtera, PT.Nabatindah Sejahtera
Tergugat:
Rektor Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
11467
  • Berdasarkan perhitungan yang PENGGUGAT peroleh dari TERGUGATbahwasanya sisa PEKERJAAN yang harus PENGGUGAT kerjakanadalah sebesar 45,856% atau setara dengan nilai Rp. 3.958.507.376,Putusan Perdata Nomor312/Padt.G/2018/PN Sgr halaman 4 dari 55(tiga milyar sembilan ratus lima puluh delapan juta lima ratus tujuh ributiga ratus tujuh puluh enam Rupiah), dengan rincian sebagai berikut :a.b.q.lr.Competition exercise floor 14 X 14 M 14.50 Thick FIG Approved;Chalk bowl;Central leg vaulting table FIG Approved
    TerhadapCompetition exercise floor 14 X 14 M 14.50 Thick FIGApproved;Chalk bowl;Central leg vaulting table FIG Approved;Pedestalbase vaulting table base surround;Competition runup track 25 x 1 m x 25mm;Soft Competition Springboard Nova Jump FIG Approved;Hard Competition Springboard Nova Jump FIG ApprovedRound off mat; 5 i. Springboard guard;Measuring tape for runup track;Self adhesive velcro for runup track;Riser panel:FIG competition set of landing mats for vault with additionalmat ref 7006;.
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 677/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS P.T.SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
3438 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Company shall provide agent fee of charge with allavailable documentation required to exercise agent bussiness.Such documentation shall include catalogues, pamphlets, pricelists, companys general terms and conditions of sale, contractforms used by company etc.Article 6 Information and Reporta. Agent shall inform Company of the following matters:1. Market trends and competitive situation with respect to sale ofProduct Territory;2. Any complaints on Products;3.
Register : 06-01-2016 — Putus : 17-03-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 17 Maret 2016 — PT. SAUDARA SEJATI LUHUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
7463 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Human rights seek toprotectindividuals especially against the exercise of public power.Taxation, on the other hand, is arguably the most visible, persistent andalmost universal interference with ownership.
    The right to protection, orpeaceful enjoyment, of ones possessions is wellknown human right.Furthermore, taxation generally and tax administration in particular, providefertile ground for conflict between the exercise of public power, on the onehand, and the need to respect the rights of individual (including corporate)taxpayers on the other hand.
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 676/B/PK/Pjk/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
4438 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • 2013ii.iii.IV.Agent shall exert its best efforts to promote sale of products on itsown account throughout Territory ;Before engaging in any or particular advertising for company,such as press advertisement, pamphlets, circulars, exhibitionarrangements etc Agent shall obtain companys approval inwriting ;Agent shall give company all reasonable assistance in advertisingcampaigns to be run by company itself in Territory ;Company shall provide agent fee of charge with all availabledocumentation required to exercise
Register : 30-06-2021 — Putus : 09-09-2021 — Upload : 10-09-2021
Putusan PN MALILI Nomor 74/Pid.B/2021/PN Mll
Tanggal 9 September 2021 — Penuntut Umum:
IMRON MASHADI, SH.MH
Terdakwa:
IKHSAN alias ICCANG
8344
  • Atau pada kasus Wake Development Co VS O'Leary, 118Cal.App. 131, 4 P.2d 802, 803 diartikan dengan meminta orang lain membayardi luar kemauannya dengan melakukan ancaman menggunakan kekuasaanyang dimilikinya rendering payment involuntary, there must be some actual orthreatened exercise of power possessed, or Supposedly possessed, by payeeover payer's person or property, from which payer has no means of immediaterelief except by advancing money (vide Henry Campbell Black, Blacks LawDictionary, Revised
Register : 14-09-2015 — Putus : 29-10-2015 — Upload : 08-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 771 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2015 — PT. RIGUNAS AGRI UTAMA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
6447 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Human rights seek toprotectindividuals especially against the exercise of public power.Taxation, on the other hand, is arguably the most visible, persistent andalmost universal interference with ownership.
    The right to protection, orpeaceful enjoyment, of ones possessions is wellknown human right.Furthermore, taxation generally and tax administration in particular, providefertile ground for conflict between the exercise of public power, on the onehand, and the need to respect the rights of individual (including corporate)tax payers on the other hand.
Register : 27-11-2020 — Putus : 15-12-2020 — Upload : 14-08-2021
Putusan PN MEDAN Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Mdn
Tanggal 15 Desember 2020 — Pemohon:
QATAR NATIONAL BANK CABANG SINGAPURA
Termohon:
PT. SEMEN BOSOWA INDONESIA
28253
  • :Accordingly we hereby demand the immediate repayment ofUS$13,877,091.95, being the total amount outstanding as oftoday's date under the Facility Letters and reserve our rights,without further notice, to exercise any and all rights, remediesand powers (including taking legal proceedings) pursuant to theterms of the Facility Letters.Terjemahan tersumpahnya adalah sebagai berikut:7.Sesuai dengannya kami dengan ini menuntut pembayarankembali dengan segera atas jumlah sebesar US$ 13.877.091,95,yang merupakan
    dan mempertahankan hak kami, tanpa perlumenyampaikan pemberitahuan terlebin dahulu, untukmenggunakan setiap dan seluruh hak, perbaikan dan wewenang(termasuk untuk mengambil proses hukum) berdasarkanketentuanketentuan Surat Fasilitas Perjanjian Kredit.e Paragraf 7 Surat Peringatan Kedua (Bukti P13)7.Accordingly we hereby demand the immediate repayment ofUS$14,242,514.72 being the total amount outstanding as oftoday's date under the Facility Letters and reserve our rights,without further notice, to exercise
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 19-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 682 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
6841 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Agent shall exert its best efforts to promote sale of products on itsown account throughout Territory.ii Before engaging in any or particular advertising for company,such as press advertisement, pamphlets, circulars, exhibitionarrangements etc Agent shall obtain companys approval inwriting.ili Agent shall give company all reasonable assistance inadvertising campaigns to be run by company itself in Territory.ivCompany shall provide agent fee of charge with all availabledocumentation required to exercise
Putus : 20-10-2015 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1308 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 20 Oktober 2015 — PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA CQ KEJAKSAAN AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA CQ KEJAKSAAN TINGGI PEKANBARU CQ KEJAKSAAN NEGERI PELALAWAN CQ JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM vs PT OTO MULTIARTHA
13899 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Dalam pada itu,menurut Article 29 (2) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948),dinyatakan sebagai berikut: (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms,everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by lawsolely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rightsand freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirement of morality,public order and the general welfare in a democratic society;Menurut hukum, semua hasil kejahatan dan pelanggaran, termasuk
Register : 10-09-2019 — Putus : 29-10-2019 — Upload : 25-09-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 71 P/HUM/2019
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2019 — DRS. EDI LANGKARA, MH (BUPATI HALMAHERA TENGAH) VS MENTERI DALAM NEGERI RI;
500906 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sepakat, sehingga merujuk pada berita acara tanggal 25Mei 2017 penyelesaian garis batas akan diputuskan olehKementerian Dalam Negeri dan kedua pemerintah kabupatenakan menerima apapun hasil keputusan yang diambil:;Pada tanggal 24 November 2017 Kementerian Dalam Negerimengadakan rapat dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten HalmaheraTengah dan Pemerintah Kabupaten Halmahera Timur sertaPemerintah Provinsi Maluku Utara di Jakarta (Bukti T11) denganhasil kesepakatan rapat sebagai berikut:a.Tim PBD Pusat melakukan exercise
    Menindaklanjuti Surat Menteri Dalam Negeri sebagaimanatersebut pada angka 12 (dua belas), maka pada tanggal 6 April2018 Kementerian Dalam Negeri dan Tim PDB Pusat mengadakanrapat final untuk menetapkan dan menyelesaikan perselisinansegmen batas Kabupaten Halmahera Timur dengan KabupatenHalmahera Tengah Provinsi Maluku Utara (Bukti T13) dengan hasilkesepakatan rapat sebagai berikut:a.Dokumen yang digunakan dalam proses exercise penyelesaianpermasalahan;Tim PBD Pusat sepakat terhadap koordinat dan
Putus : 19-03-2014 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 692/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 19 Maret 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
14455 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Promotioni.i.iil.iv.Agent shall exert its best efforts to promote sale of products on itsow account throughout Territory.Before engaging in any or particular advertising for company, suchas press advertisement, pamphlets, circulars, exhibitionarrangements etc Agent shall obtain companys approval in witing.Agent shall give company all reasonable assistance in advertisingcampaigns to be run by company itself in Territory.Company shall provide agent fee of charge wth all availabledocumentation required to exercise
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 681/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
15056 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Promotioni Agent shall exert its best efforts to promote sale of products on itsown account throughout Territory.ii Before engaging in any or particular advertising for company,such as press advertisement, pamphlets, circulars, exhibitionarrangements etc Agent shall obtain companys approval inwriting.it Agent shall give company all reasonable assistance inadvertising campaigns to be run by company itself in Territory.ivCompany shall provide agent fee of charge with all availabledocumentation required to exercise
Putus : 29-02-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1239/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 29 Februari 2016 — PT. INDO SEPADAN JAYA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
318150 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Human rights seek toprotectindividuals especially against the exercise of public power.Taxation, on the other hand, is arguably the most visible, persistent andalmost universal interference with ownership.
    The right to protection, orpeaceful enjoyment, of ones possessions is wellknown human right.Furthermore, taxation generally and tax administration in particular,provide fertile ground for conflict between the exercise of public power, onHalaman 48 dari 51 halaman Putusan Nomor 1239/B/PK/PJK/2015the one hand, and the need to respect the rights of individual (includingcorporate) taxpayers on the other hand.