Ditemukan 40 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 01-02-2012 — Putus : 25-02-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.43422/PP/M.VIII/12/2013
Tanggal 25 Februari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
147113
  • Notwithstanding any otherprovisions herein, Representative acknowledges that is solely responsible for anyand all tax or Representatives receipt of the settlement funds;2.2 (a) The initial 90% of the settlement funds (US $3,6000.000.00) will be funded byBaker Within 7 (seven) business days following the mutual execution of thisSettlement Agreemnt by the parties. ....
    (b) The 10% balance of settlement funds (US $ 400,000,00.) wil funded byBaker within 7 (seven) business days following the mutual execution of allappropriate share transfer documentation and resignations by the shareholders anddirector of PT Eastman Christensen Indonesia (PT ECI) , Mr Rayan Wijaya, MrToto Utomo, and Mr Herman Ganda which actions will implement the newshareholding structure in PT ECI. ....bahwa berdasarkan Termination Agreement (of Sales Representative Agreement)tersebut disepakati
Putus : 16-11-2021 — Upload : 20-01-2022
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1450 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021
Tanggal 16 Nopember 2021 — SUHARSO VS PT INDOSAT, Tbk. yang diwakili oleh Direktur, Irsyad Sahroni,
219115 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • C29A/IO/2020tanggal 14 Februari 2020 perihal Pemberitahuan tentang Reorganisasidan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, dengan kompensasi berupa uangpesangon 2x ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (2), uang penghargaan masakerja 1x ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (3) dan uang penggantian hak 15%(lima belas persen) sesuai ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (4) Undang UndangNomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan yang diperhitungkandengan saldo iuran perusahaan pada Jiwasraya, dan apabila terdaftardalam program Fully Funded Jiwasraya
Register : 27-09-2016 — Putus : 02-11-2016 — Upload : 11-12-2019
Putusan PA TASIKMALAYA KOTA Nomor 1434/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Tmk
Tanggal 2 Nopember 2016 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
126
  • PUTUSANNomor t434/Pdt Ga016/PA Trekager th (yar sll all peasDEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESAPignadiart funded tule fdwakrviigve yvaoo memerksa dan mendacilinerkara terteniu pada tingkat pertama dalam sidang majelis telah menjatuhkanpuitusan perkara ceral quaat antara:Po vierig i? tan, adana isham. pekenaan MenaurusRumah Tangaga. pendidikan SLTP. tempat kediaman di Buruiul fllRT. 004 RW O02. Kelurahan Nagarasari.
Putus : 15-04-2014 — Upload : 24-03-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1781 K/Pid.Sus/2013
Tanggal 15 April 2014 — NIGEL ANDREW THOMAS
4628 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Raf has a New dive boat and dive equipment,and you could say that is has been funded by NSWA"s US 6000. Pleasecan an interest free loan from NSWA to fund my business? About COTS,we had report at the last meeting from Terry that Tanjung Pisok was bad from5 m to 20 m. Are there any other bad sites ? Cheers Nigel. Dan terjemahandalam bahasa Indnesia menerangkan (Hai Jaako, saya pikir kamu terlaluHal. 2 dari 32 hal. Put.
    Raf has a newdive boat and dive equipment, and you could say that is has been funded byNSWA"s US $ 6000. Please can an interesting free loan from NSWA to fundmy business ? About COTS, we had report at the last meeting from Terry thatTanjung Pisok was bad from 5 m to 20m. Are there any other bad sites ?Cheers Nigel.
Register : 16-10-2020 — Putus : 28-06-2021 — Upload : 27-07-2021
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 121/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Sby
Tanggal 28 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
PT. INDOSAT, Tbk
Tergugat:
AGUNG PONANG PAMUNGKAS
14331
  • ketentuan kompensasipemutusan hubungan kerja normatif menurut Undangundang No. 13tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 156 ayat (2), ayat (3), danayat (4).Bahwa paket kompensasi aquo meliputi uang pesangon, uangpenghargaan masa kerja dan uang penggantian hak sesuai UndangUndang No. 13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan dikurangi sisakewajiban Tergugat (jika ada) kepada Penggugat, yang diperhitungkandengan saldo iuran Perusahaan pada Jiwasraya (dalam hal Karyawanterdaftar dalam program fully funded
    Dalamhal Karyawan terdaftar dalam program fully funded Jiwasraya makajumlah kompensasi yang lebih besar yang akan diterima Karyawan,ditambah dengan sweetener.Bahwa termasuk apabila Tergugat terdaftar dalam program Fully FundedJiwasraya, maka kompensasi pemutusan hubungan kerja akandiperhitungan dengan saldo porsi iuran Perusahaan, mana yang jumlahkompensasinya lebih besar yang akan diterima oleh Tergugat.Bahwa kompensasi Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja yang akan diterimaTergugat adalah berupa uang pesangon
    sebesar 2x ketentuan Pasal 156ayat (2), uang penghargaan masa kerja 1x ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (3)dan uang penggantian hak 15% sesuai ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (4)UndangUndang No. 13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan yangdiperhitungkan dengan saldo iuran Perusahaan pada Jiwasraya, (danapabila terdaftar dalam program Fully Funded Jiwasraya makakompensasi yang lebih besar yang akan diterima), ditambah sisa haricuti S/d 01 Juli 2020, dan uang cuti telah tepat, serta dipotong kewajibanTergugat (apabila
    di kamar hotel tersebut, Tergugat dipanggil satu per satu danhanya berdua dengan perwakilan manajemen perusahaan.Bahwa alasan direksi perusahaan melakukan PHK terhadap sekitar 677karyawan termasuk didalamnya Tergugat, yakni adanya programreorganisasi atau efisiensi karyawan.Bahwa sepengetahuan saksi, pada surat PHK Tergugat perusahaanmenawarkan berbagai pilihan paket penawaran kompensasi PHK yangsangat menarik dan menggiurkan, yakni saldo/kompensasi pesangonyang telah dianggarkan/diiurkan (fully funded
    , maka Penggugatmengajukan gugatan pemutusan hubungan kerja terrhadap Tergugat dengankompensasi yang akan diterima oleh Tergugat berupa uang pesangonsebesar 2 (dua) kali ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (2), uang penghargaan masakerja sebesar 1 (Satu) kali ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (3) dan uangpenggantian hak 15% sesuai ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (4) UndangUndangNomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan yang diperhitungkan dengansaldo iuran perusahaan pada Jiwasraya, apabila terdaftar dalam programFully Funded
Putus : 19-03-2014 — Upload : 14-08-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 886 /B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 19 Maret 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. GEMA TERRA
4214 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • mempelajari kontrak yang adabahwa atas komponen beban biaya tersebut merupakan penghasilan atauperedaran usaha Pemohon Banding, Pemohon Banding tidak setuju ataspendapat Terbanding tersebut, untuk itu Pemohon Banding mengajukanbanding atas keputusan tersebut karena sesuai dengan Kontrak Nomor :APD/BLT/006/05 sebagaimana tertuang dalam pasalpasal yang diuraikandibawah menunjukkan bahwa komponen beban biaya Biliton itu bukanmerupakan penghasilan Pemohon Banding sebagai berikut:Bahwa Pasal 6.3 Company Funded
Register : 09-07-2020 — Putus : 19-10-2020 — Upload : 21-10-2020
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 69/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Sby
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2020 — Penggugat:
PT. INDOSAT, Tbk
Tergugat:
1.Rudi Achmad Bachtiar
2.Ary Budhiyanto
10636
  • Para Tergugat tentangpaketpaket kompensasi tersedia bagi karyawan terdampak yangbesarannya sangat jauh melebihi ketentuan pesangon normatifUndangundang Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 156 ayat (2), ayat (3), dan ayat(4).Paket kompensasi aquo meliputi uang pesangon, uang penghargaanmasa kerja dan uang penggantian hak sesuai UU Ketenagakerjaandikurangi sisa kewajiban Para Tergugat kepada Penggugat, yangdiperhitungkan dengan saldo iuran Perusahaan pada Jiwasraya (dalamhal Karyawan terdaftar dalam program fully funded
Register : 04-11-2020 — Putus : 28-06-2021 — Upload : 16-08-2021
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 69/Pdt.Sus-PLW.PHI/2020/PN Sby
Tanggal 28 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
1.Rudy Achmad Bachtiar Alamsjah
2.Ary Budhiyanto
Tergugat:
PT. INDOSAT, Tbk
11219
  • SehinggaTerlawan merasa perlu menawarkan atau merayu Para Pelawandengan memberikan penawaran kompensasi yang sangat menarik.C) Sejakmenganggarkan/menyiapkan/menyanggupi kompensasi PHK yangawal Terlawan sudahcukup kepada Para Pelawan, yakni saldo/kompensasi pesangonyang telah dianggarkan/diiurkan (fully funded) melalui asuransiJiwasraya, ditambah sweetener berupa tambahan kompensasihingga 12 (dua belas) kali upah, kompensasi kenaikan gaji, danberbagai kelebihan/tambahan kompensasi lainnya.Hal. 13
    Saldo/kompensasi pesangon yang telah dianggarkan/diiurkan(fully funded) melalui asuransi Jiwasraya.2. Sisa cuti yang belum dibayarkan3. Excess Medical4. Excess Fasilitas Telepon5.
    permohonanpemutusan hubungan kerja terhadap Para Tergugat/Para Pelawan dengankompensasi yang akan diterima oleh Para Tergugat/Para Pelawan berupauang pesangon sebesar 2 (dua) kali ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (2), uangpenghargaan masa kerja sebesar 1 (Satu) kali ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (3)dan uang penggantian hak 15% sesuai ketentuan Pasal 156 ayat (4)UndangUndang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, yangdiperhitungkan dengan saldo iuran perusahaan pada Jiwasraya, apabilaterdaftar dalam program Fully Funded
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1431/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3912 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1431/B/PK/PJK/2017Peoeveds se Artice 2 Exhibit ABADAK LNG (BONTANG LNG) PROCESSINGAGREEMENT (Amended & Restatted, 1988): Cash CallsFrom tims te tine, a3 Recessaty, Plant Operator shall cashCall from Producers; and Producers shall pay of cause to bepald fo Blant OSperster ia Gi dollars their respectiveshares, separately determined as provided in Section 8.01 ofEhe Agreement, of Projected het cash fquirementa For eqchof:fa) Plane Operating Costa; and(5) the esets of Currently Funded Capital
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1432/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
4312 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1432/B/PK/PJK/2017 2,Cash CallsFrom times to tine, ag hececsary, Plant Operator shall cashCall from Producers; and Producers shall pay or cause to bepaid to Blant Operator in os dollars Gheir respectiveShares, separately deternined as Brovided in Secticn 8.01 ofthe Agreement, of Peejected het cash rquirementa For eachof:(a) Plane Operating Costa; and(6) the esets oF Currently Funded Capital Projectsfor @ calendar Benth ef part thereof, as get forth in auchCaeh calls.The cash ealie For
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 806/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
4825 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 806/B/PK/PJK/2016Artice 2 Exhibit ABADAK LNG (BONTANG LNG)PROCESSING AGREEMENT (Amended &Restatted, 1988):a Cash, CallsA, i i From time to time, as necessary, Plant Operator shall cash Cali .from Producers; and Producrs shall pay or cause te bepald fo Blant oOpetater in OS dollars their reepece legshares, separately determined as Provided in Section 8.01 ofEh@ Agreement, of Prejected net cash requirements For eachof:(a) Plane Operating Costa; and(6) the ests of Currently Funded Capital
Register : 16-07-2014 — Putus : 09-06-2015 — Upload : 30-07-2015
Putusan PA PEMALANG Nomor 1794/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Pml.
Tanggal 9 Juni 2015 — penggugat vs tergugat
235
  • Uang keuntungan hasil usaha perdagangan eceran khusus alatalat optik (kacamata) selama 2011 2014 (86 bulan) X Rp.12.000.000, = Rp. 432.000.000, (empat ratus tiga puluh duaJUNE FUNDED) jammer ttf. Uang penerimaan hasil sewa (kontrakan) rumah HM.
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 812/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. Pertamina (Persero) vs. Direktur Jenderal Pajak
4519 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 812/B/PK/PJK/2016 paid to Plant Operater in og Sollacs their respectiveShares, separately deternined as Previded Ln Section &.01 ofthe Agreement, of Peejected net cash requirements For eachof:(2) Plane Operating Costs; and(5) the esses af Currently Funded Capital Projectsfor @ calendar senth ar BaPe thereof, as get forth in suchCaeh calls,The cash calls for Blank Operating cCests and CurrentlyFunded Capital Projects shall ba Siewn Separately and ghalibe in aeordance with Producers"
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1433/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
5126 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1433/B/PK/PJK/2017 Cash CallsFrom tims tc tine, as necessaty, Plant Operator shall cashCall from Producers, and Producers shall Pay of cause to bepald fo Blant Operater in GS dollars their rspectiveShares, separately determined as Brovided in Seckticn 8.01 ofEhe Agreement, of Peejected net cash fequirements For eachof:(a) Blane Operating Costa; and(5) the esets er Currently Funded Capital Projectsfor @ calendar senth Sr Bt theceof, as s@t forth in suchCah calls.The cash ealle For Plane
Register : 22-06-2021 — Putus : 22-11-2021 — Upload : 05-12-2021
Putusan PTUN JAKARTA Nomor 145/G/TF/2021/PTUN.JKT
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2021 — Penggugat:
Perkumpulan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Masyarakat
Tergugat:
Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia
358246
  • This means that such servicesshould also be adequately funded; appropriate for particularvulnerable or marginalised groups; compliant withfundamental rights (such as to privacy, bodily integrity, dueprocess, and freedom from arbitrary detention), andrespectful of human dignity;b.
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1075 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
4217 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • CallsFrom time to time, as hecessaty, Plant Operator shall cashCali from Producers; and Producrs shall pay or cause. to bePaid to Plant Operater in og @ollars their respectiveShares, separately deternined as Previded in Section 8.01 ofthe Agreement, of Projected net eash Fquirements For eachof:(a) Plane Operating Cozes; and(5) the costs of Currently Funded capital Projectsfor 4 calendar soenth Sr BFt thercesf, as set ferkh in suchCash calls,The cash alles For Plant Operating Costs and CurrentlyFunded
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 26-10-2016 — Upload : 05-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1033 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 26 Oktober 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
4734 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Cash CalisFrom time to time, as necessary, Plant Operator shall cash all.from Producers; and Producrs shall pay or cause to bePaid to Plant Operater in gg @ollars their respectiveshares, separately determined as Provided im Section 8.01 ofEhe Agreement, of Projected net cash Fequirements for eachof:(a) Plane Operating Costa; and(6) the costs of Currently Funded Capital ProjectsOF @ calendar fenth ar pare thereof, as get forth in suchcash calls,The cash alls for Plant Operating casts and CurrentlyFunded
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1037 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
3925 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1037/B/PK/PJK/2016 Artice 2 Exhibit A BADAK LNG (BONTANGLNG) PROCESSING AGREEMENT (Amended& Restatted, 1988): 2, Cash, CallsA, From time to time, as hecessacy, Plant Operator shall cashCali from Producers; and Producrs shall pay or cause. to bePaid S Blant Operater ia O35 dollars their Fespece lveShares, separately determined as Previded Ln Section A.ol ofthe Agreement, of Projected net eash Fquirements For eachof:(a) Plane Operating Costs; and(5) the costs of Currently Funded capital
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 809/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3320 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 809/B/PK/PJK/2016Artice 2 Exhibit ABADAK LNG (BONTANG LNG)PROCESSING AGREEMENT (Amended &Restatted, 1988): Cash, CallsFrom time to time, as necessary, Plant Operator shall cashCali .from Producers; and Producrs shall pay or cause to be Paid S Blant OGpetater in OS dollars their Fespecel vaShares, separately detersined as Provided in Section 8.01 ofth Agreement, of Beojected net cash Fequirements For eachof:(a) Plane Operating Costa; and(5) the costs of Currently Funded Capital ProjectsFor
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1034/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3222 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • CallsFrom time to time, as hecessaty, Plant Operator shall cashcall from Producers, and Producers shall pay or cause. to bePaid to Plant Operater in og Sollars their respeceiveShares, separately deternined as Previded in Section 8.01 ofthe Agreement, of Projected net eash Fequirements For #achof:(a) Plane Operating Costs; and(5) the costs of Currently Funded Capital Projectsfor 4 calendar sonth or Barc Eheresf., as gt forth ip suchCash calls,The cash ealle For Blane Operating Casts and CurrentlyFunded