Ditemukan 5 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : sumoked summenep summons summon
Pengadilan PA SAMARINDA Perdata Agama
Register : 22-08-2022 — Putus : 15-09-2022 — Upload : 15-09-2022
Putusan PA SAMARINDA Nomor 1445/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Smd
Tanggal 15 September 2022 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
48 — 31
    1. Declared the Defendant who had been formally summoned and proper to come before the trial was not present;
    2. Granting Plaintiff's suit with verstex;
    3. Imposed talak one ba'in shugra Defendant (Rajiman bin Arjo Pawiro Misran), against Plaintiff (Ngatmi binti Pardi);
    4. Charge the Plaintiff a case fee of Rp355,000.00 (three hundred and fifty-five thousand rupiah).
Pengadilan PA RANTAU PRAPAT Perdata Agama
Register : 25-06-2024 — Putus : 23-07-2024 — Upload : 23-07-2024
Putusan PA RANTAU PRAPAT Nomor 943/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Rap
Tanggal 23 Juli 2024 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
16 — 12
    1. Declaring that the Defendant, who has been officially summoned and is fit to appear at court, is not present;
    2. Granting the Plaintiff's claim by default;
    3. Imposing a divorce of one ba'in sughra on the Defendant (Bagus Budiono bin Ali Mukti) against the Plaintiff (Tia Andriani binti Suyono);
    4. Determine that the two children of the Plaintiff and Defendant, namely
Pengadilan PN TANGERANG Perdata
Register : 11-10-2022 — Putus : 14-12-2022 — Upload : 16-12-2022
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 1094/Pdt.G/2022/PN Tng
Tanggal 14 Desember 2022 — Penggugat:
Dokter NIA PURBASARI
Tergugat:
1.IR. Susiani
2.RADUSEH SEBAYANG
Turut Tergugat:
1.Yeni Ambaryatun, SH selaku Notaris di Tangerang Selatan
2.Kepala Kantor Pertanahan Kota Tangerang Selatan
102 — 21

  • M E N G A D I L I

    1. Stating Defendant I, Defendant II, Co-Defendant I and Co-Defendant II have been summoned appropriately but absently;
    2. Grant plaintiff's suit entirely with Verstek;
    3. Stating The Affidavit dated March 18, 2010 made by Defendant I is valid and valuable as a binding sale and purchase and power between Defendant I and Defendant II to transfer the object of dispute over
Restatement Grosse Akta
Author : Ahmad Fikri Assegaf; Elijana Tanjah;
Grosse Akta
4733 — 4447
  • Alasan memilih topik grosse akte sebagai salah satu pokok bahasan Restatement adalah terdapatnya kesimpangsiuran terkait grosse akte. Grosse akte mempunyai judul Demi Ketuhanan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa seperti irah-irah putusan pengadilan ... [Selengkapnya]
  • In this context,one could think of a bailiff who includes the answer of the summoned party in awrit of summons. This statement has no imperative evidentiary value because it wasnot assigned to the bailiff. Nor will the statement of a notary public in a will that thetestator was of sound mind be able serve as imperative evidence of this fact?
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Persaingan Usaha
Putus : 05-05-2010 — Upload : 14-02-2022
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 128 PK/PDT.SUS/2009
Tanggal 5 Mei 2010 — PT TELEKOMUNIKASI SELULAR, dkk terhadap KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA REPUBLIK INDONESIA dkk
1028 — 727 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • l left the company because felt that could no longer offer any contributionthat would be of value to the company's needs,' he saidIndonesia's media has been reporting the details of the KPPUinvestigation with excerpts from its official report even though it hasyet to be officially released.According to the reports, Temasek has been found to have breachedregulations and has been summoned to appear before a fiveman council torespond to the findings.The KPPU is not expected to issue a ruling before