Ditemukan 9774 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 21-07-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42596/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13882
  • Berdasarkan ATTACHMENT A: OPERATIONAL CERTIFICATIONPROCEDURES FOR THE RULES OF ORIGIN OF THE ASEANCHINA FREETRADE AREA pada Rule 6 butir (a) dinyatakan "The Government authoritiesdesignated to issue the Certificate of Origin shall, to the best of their competenceand ability, carry out proper examination upon each application for the Certificateof Origin to ensure that:a. The application and the Certificate of Origin are duly completed and signedby the authorised signatory;b.
Register : 23-08-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42599/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11154
  • signifikan antara tandatangan yang tertera pada Form E dengan specimen yang berwenang, sehinggakeabsahan dokumen Form E diragukan dan atas importasi PIB Nomor 189954tanggal 25/05/2011 ditetapkan berdasarkan tarif yang berlaku umum;bahwa penelitian terhadap uraian masalah dan dokumen pelengkap adalahsebagai berikut:a) Berdasarkan Rule 6 Attachment A Operational Certification Procedure (OCP)Anex 3 attachment A ditegaskan bahwa"Rule 6The Government authorities designated to issue the Certificate of Origin shall
Putus : 11-09-2014 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 489 B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 11 September 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. SMELTING
4024 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • disetorkan telahdiakui oleh Bank dan Surat Setoran Pajak juga merupakan Faktur PajakStandar, maka seharusnya Surat Setoran Pajak tersebut adalah sah danvalid untuk bisa dikreditkan sebagai Pajak Masukan di dalam SPT MasaPajak Pertambahan Nilai Pemohon Banding;bahwa perlu Pemohon Banding jelaskan bahwa berdasarkan Section 2dari "Offshore Operation and Technical Assistance Agreement" antaraPemohon Banding dengan Mitsubishi Materials Corporation ("MMC")tertanggal 11 Desember 1996 disebutkan bahwa:eee MMC shall
    MMC's services shall beperformed in Japan or elsewhere outside of the Republic Indonesia;bahwa berdasarkan Section 4 dari Agreement tersebut dinyatakanbahwa:.MMC shall send to PT Smelting an invoice for any of the followingincurred in the prior month.. a) the support fee, b) expenses that arereimbursable by PT Smelting to MMC pursuant to this agreement,Halaman 5 dari 23 halaman.
Putus : 24-02-2010 — Upload : 29-07-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 109K/PDTSUS/2010
Tanggal 24 Februari 2010 — ARTHAGRAHA GENERAL INSURANCE, ; MAJELIS ARBITRASE AD-HOC, Cq. H.A. GUSNAENI, SH., MBA, KORNELIUS SIMANJUNTAK, SH., MH, AAIK., dan H. MOELYANTO SOEWITO, SE., AAIK (HC), dalam perkara antara para Pemohon lawan PT. MALIGI SPINNING MILLS, PT. MELIGI SPINNING MILLS, dkk.
276215 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ARTHAGRAHA GENERAL INSURANCE, as representative of thecoinsurance shall attend to all matters connected with this coinsuranceincluding processing of claims and premium collection but claimspayment is handled by each coinsurer independently;c. Any agreement of decision which may be made between the assured andPT. ARTHAGRAHA GENERAL INSURANCE in connection with this coinsurance shall be final and binding upon all other coinsurers;d. Any notice which may be given by the assured to PT.
    ARTHAGRAHAGENERAL INSURANCE in writing or otherwise shall be deemed as givento all other coinsurers as well ;Hal. 13 dari 20 hal. Put.
Register : 17-02-2016 — Putus : 30-03-2016 — Upload : 10-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 178 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 30 Maret 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS JOB PERTAMINA - TALISMAN (OGAN KOMERING) LTD;
4328 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • PSC antara laindinyatakan:"The cost accruing therefrom shall be included in operating costsrecoverable as provided in section VI.
    General and administrative costs, other than direct charges, allocable tothis operation should be determined by a detailed study, and the methoddetermined by such study shall be applied each year consistently.
    Themethod selected must be approved by PERTAMINA, and suchapproval can be reviewed peridacly by PERTAMINA and CNW'";"The Last sentence of Article 3.3 of Exibit D the PSC is amended to be:"The Direct and indirect costs incurred by PHE OGAN KOMERING asOperator and TALISMAN in so providing assistance to Operator shall becharged to the Joint Account and sahall be Included in operating costs";Surat Direktur Utama Pertamina Nomor 947/C.0000/81 tanggal 5 JuniTahun 1981, antara lain dinyatakan:"berdasarkan
Putus : 19-11-2014 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 612 /B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 19 Nopember 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SMELTING
19766 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • merupakan Faktur PajakStandar, maka seharusnya Surat Setoran Pajak tersebut adalah sah danvalid untuk bisa dikreditkan sebagai Pajak Masukan di dalam SPT MasaPajak Pertambahan Nilai Pemohon Banding;Bahwa perlu Pemohon Banding jelaskan bahwa berdasarkan Section 2dari "Offshore Operation and Technical Assistance Agreement" antaraPemohon Banding dengan Mitsubishi Materials Corporation ("MMC")tertanggal 11 Desember 1996 disebutkan bahwa:Halaman 5 dari 23 Halaman Putusan Nomor 612 /B/PK/PJK/2014veveee MMC shall
    MMC's services shall beperformed in Japan or elsewhere outside of the Republic Indonesia,Bahwa berdasarkan Section 4 dari Agreement tersebut dinyatakanbahwa:.MMC shall send to PT Smelting an invoice for any of the followingincurred in the prior month.. a) the support fee, b) expenses that arereimbursable by PT Smelting to MMC pursuant to this agreement,Bahwa dalam rangka pemberian jasa di bidang hukum sebagaimanadisebutkan didalam section 2 tersebut di atas, MMC menggunakan jasadari konsultan hukum
Putus : 17-10-2012 — Upload : 12-09-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 192 B/PK/PJK/2011
Tanggal 17 Oktober 2012 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SANTA FE SUPRACO INDONESIA
6231 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • perjanjian/kontrak jasa pengeboran dengan Total dimanaTermohon Peninjauan Kembali semula Pemohon Banding memberikanjasa pengeboran kepada Total ; Bahwa Termohon Peninjauan Kembali semula Pemohon Banding jugamengadakan perjanjian/kontrak (Bareboat Charter Agreement) denganGSFIS untuk menyewa peralatan berupa rig yang dimiliki GSFIS yaituRig Parameswara dan Rig 136 serta peralatan lain yang terkait denganoperasional rig tersebut ; Bahwa Bareboat Charter Agreement menyebutkan :Angka 6"The Charteter shall
    This shall include, butshall not be limited to proper manning, maintenance, insurance,victualling, fuel, supplies, port charges, canal dues and pilotages" ;e Bahwa Termohon Peninjauan Kembali semula Pemohon Banding dan GSFISselain mengikat kontrak Bareboat Charter juga mengikat kontrak TechnicalService & Operation Agreement ;10.
    perjanjian/kontrak jasa pengeboran dengan Total dimanaTermohon Peninjauan Kembali semula Pemohon Banding memberikan jasapengeboran kepada Total ;e Bahwa Termohon Peninjauan Kembali semula Pemohon Banding jugamengadakan perjanjian/kontrak (Bareboat Charter Agreement) denganGSFIS untuk menyewa peralatan berupa rig yang dimiliki GSFIS yaitu RigParameswara dan Rig 136 serta peralatan lain yang terkait denganoperasional rig tersebut ;e Bahwa Bareboat Charter Agreement menyebutkan :Angka 6"The Charteter shall
    This shall include, butshall not be limited to proper manning, maintenance, insurance,victualling, fuel, supplies, port charges, canal dues and pilotages" ; Bahwa Termohon Peninjauan Kembali semula Pemohon Banding danGSFIS selain mengikat kontrak Bareboat Charter juga mengikat kontrakTechnical Service & Operation Agreement ;10.
Register : 17-07-2014 — Putus : 11-12-2014 — Upload : 11-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 50 P/HUM/2014
Tanggal 11 Desember 2014 — PERKUMPULAN FORUM ZAKAT JAKARTA, DKK VS PRESIDEN RI;
18397 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience andreligion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religionor belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in communitywith others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief inworship, observance, practice and teaching.2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom tohave or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.3.
    The steps to be taken by a State Party to the present Covenant toachieve the full realization of this right shall include technical andvocational guidance and training programmes, policies andtechniques to achieve steady economic, social and culturaldevelopment and full and productive employment under conditionssafeguarding fundamental political and economic freedoms to theindividual.6.
Register : 02-02-2017 — Putus : 01-03-2017 — Upload : 27-03-2019
Putusan PA MUARA BULIAN Nomor 0059/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mbl
Tanggal 1 Maret 2017 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
1721
  • lebih ringan sebagaimana terdapat dalam kitab a/Asybah wa anNazhairyang selanjutnya diambil alih sebagai pendapat Majelis Hakim dalam memutusperkara ini sebagai berikut:Lag) GIS LI ada Legals) (6.9) Glituds Qa jbo 141Artinya: Apabila terjadi dua mudharat harus diambil mudharat yang lebihringan.Menimbang, bahwa Majelis Hakim perlu mengambil alin pendapat Dr.Musthafa As Sibai dalam Kitab Al Marah bainal Figh wal Qanun halaman 100sebagai berikut :Anh Gl we Ge alld Lae EI Gilly Glas ae aia Asa 5 5il shall
    oliEl all Nae Gilul GSs Lege y Qyatablile Gu Elotal Cd AY s agS sly YMCal Cans leds Gn Aang 5 AE Shall ce Go) gk ye Ald Lgl gl GIS plaJ) SY!
Register : 11-04-2016 — Putus : 18-05-2016 — Upload : 26-05-2016
Putusan PTA YOGYAKARTA Nomor 14/Pdt.G/2016/PTA.Yk
Tanggal 18 Mei 2016 — PEMBANDING LAWAN TERBANDING
3622
  • halaman 115 yang diambil alih sebagai pendapat sendiri olehMajelis hakim manyatakan:ct Ys aeSsley oY SY) Aut all joe Ge lla (8 bolas EN jally GLEAN ae ALY dans 5M shall gliAse 5M AS Mall eit Gh esl Gye alld Ledlig) GIS Lubes G1 all hs Gilasl OS Legey Gaels Gus g Leta!
Putus : 12-03-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1133/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 12 Maret 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. GAPURA ANGKASA
6535 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • HikmahantoJuwana, SH, LL.M, Ph.D sebagai berikut:1) Bahwa di dalam huruf a article 92 Konvensi Chicago1944, disebutkan this convention shall be open foradherence by members of the united nations and stateswith then, and states which remained neutral during thepresent world conflict kemudian di huruf b disebutkanadherence shall be effected by a notification addressedto the government of the United States of America andshall take effect as from the thirtieth day from the receiptof the notification
    by the government of the United Statesof America, which shall notify all the contracting states.Negara Republik Indonesia melalui Kedutaan RepublikIndonesia Serikat untuk Amerika Serikat telahmengirimkan notifikasi tanggal 26 April 1950 dan telahditerima pemerintah Amerika Serikat tanggal 27 April1950, sehingga sesuai ketentuan article 92 maka NegaraRepublik Indonesia telah menjadi anggota ICAO danketentuanketentuan yang terdapat di dalam KonvensiChicago 1944 beserta annexesnya mengikat NegaraRepublik
    Article 24 (a)) that fuel and lubricating oils onboard an aircraft of a Contracting State on arrival in theterritory of another Contracting State and retained onboard on leaving the territory of that State shall beexempt from customs duty, inspection fees or similarnational or local duties and charges.
    Putusan Nomor 1133/B/PK/PJK/2014negara anggota yang melintasi yurisdiksi negara anggotalainnya.Bahwa dalam angka 2 huruf a, Council Resolution OnTaxation Of Internasional Air Transport disebutkan Withrespect to the taxation of income of internasional airtransport enterprises and taxation of aircraft and othermoveable property, each Contracting State shall, to thefullest possible extent, grant reciprocally, kemudian diangka 3 disebutkan With respect to taxes on the sale anduse of internasional air
Putus : 28-11-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 399/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 28 Nopember 2013 — PT. L’OREAL INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
80110 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • L'Oreal shall execute and sign all confirmative deedsand documents necessary to comply with formalities which might be required bythe laws and regulations prevailing in the Territory to make such exploitationright valid and enforceable against third parties.Bahwa sesuai dengan yang dimaksud dalam perjanjian, pihak L'Oreal S.A.membebani Pemohon Banding royalty karena Pemohon Banding mempunyaihak untuk memasarkan barangbarang yang berteknologi serta menggunakanmerek dagang tertentu.
    Putusan Nomor 399/B/PK/PJK/2013Upon Licensee's request, L'Oreal shall execute and sign allconfirmative deeds and documents necessary to comply withformalities which might be required by the laws and regulationsprevailing in the Territory to make such exploitation right validand enforceable against third parties.Sesuai dengan yang dimaksud dalam perjanjian, pihak L'Oreal S.A.France membebani Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali royalti karenaPemohon Peninjauan Kembali mempunyai hak untuk memasarkanbarangbarang
    di dalam perjanjian tersebut keberatan melalui pemberiansurat tertulis paling lambat 6 (enam) bulan sebelum masa daluarsaberakhir pada 1 (satu) tahun periode.Bahwa hal tersebut telah membuktikan pendapat Majelis HakimPengadilan Pajak atas masa berlaku perjanjian Licensed Agreementadalah tidak benar dan dapat menyebabkan intrepretasi yangberbeda.Bahwa Pemohon Peninjauan kembali telah menjelaskan selamaproses banding atas butir 1.2 dalam Licensed Agreement yangmenyatakan bahwa:"License trademark shall
    mean cosmetic, hygiene and toiletryproducts manufactured in accordance with the Technology (ashereafter defined) and that the parties have agreed to market in theTerritory under the Licensed trademark"Dan butir 1.4 dalam Licensed Agreement yang menyatakan bahwa:"Technology shall mean all proprietary information developed byL'Oreal in connection with the composition and/or manufacture ofLicensed Products, and relating more particularly to .formulae withthe relevant operating instructions, as well
    Atas status kepemilikantersebut, L'Oreal SA France berhak untuk melakukan transferteknologi sesuai butir dalam Licensed Agreement sebagai berikut:"Transferred Technology" shall mean all proprietary informationdeveloped by L'Oreal in connection with the composition and/ormanufacture of Licensed Products, and relating more particularly toformulae with the relevant operating instructions, as well as qualitystandards and testing techniques and all appropriate technicalinstructions (directions for use
Putus : 25-06-2009 — Upload : 24-08-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 331K/PDTSUS/2009
Tanggal 25 Juni 2009 — Sandra Ang, Cs ; Lift Leasing Sarl, dkk. ; PT. Adam Skyconnection Air Lines ; Sdr. Gunawan Widyaatmadja, SH, dkk.
266239 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If, under the Lease, Lessee is required to pay a Deposit, theremaining privisions of this clause shall apply. Lessee agreesthat Lessor shall be entitled to Commingle the Deposit withLessors general or other funds, Lessor will not hold any suchfunds as agent or on trust for Lessee or in any similar fiduciarycapacity and Lessees right to a refund at the Deposit amountis limited as set out in the Lease.b.
    If Lessee fails to comply with any provision of the Lease or theOther Agreements, or any Default shall have occurred toHal. 76 dari 316 hal. Put.
    If requested by Lessor, Lessee shall thereupon cause theHal. 304 dari 316 hal. Put. No. 331 K/Pdt.Sus/2009Aircraft to be deregistered by the Air Authority.
Register : 03-03-2014 — Putus : 26-05-2014 — Upload : 27-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 112 B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 26 Mei 2014 — PT. LIPPO BANK VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
193119 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Article also includes payments by aresident of one of the Contracting States for the use of, or the fight touse, industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, but not includingships, aircraft or containers the income from which is exempt from taxby the other Contracting State under Article 9 (Shipping and AirTransport)";Bahwa Pasal 8 ayat 1 Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda(P3B) antara Indonesia dan Amerika menyebutkan bahwa:Business profits of a resident of one of the Contracting States shall
    selisin/koreksi objek sewa jaringan Bloombergdipertahankan;Menurut Pemohon Banding:Bahwa Pemohon Banding tidak setuju sebagian dengan koreksi objek PajakPenghasilan Pasal 26 sebesar Rp3.116.170.471,00 oleh Terbanding atasSoftware Project Bankfrade dalam perkiraan RRA Pembelian ATI CAPEXdengan penjelasan sebagai berikut:Bahwa Pasal 8 ayat 1 Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B)antara Indonesia dan Amerika menyebutkan bahwa:"Business profits of a resident of one of the Contracting States shall
    sourceswithin such other Contracting State from sales of goods or merchandise ofthe same kind as those sold, or from other business transactions of thesame kinds as those effected, through the permanent establishment";Bahwa Pasal 13 ayat 2 Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B)antara Indonesia dan Amerika menyebutkan bahwa:"The rate of tax imposed by a Contracting State on royalties derived fromsources within that Contracting State and beneficially owned by a residentof the other Contracting State shall
    commercial or scientific equipment, but not including ships,aircraft or containers the income from which is exempt from tax by the otherContracting State under Article 9 (Shipping and Air Transport)";Bahwa lebih lanjut Pasal 13 ayat 2 Persetujuan Penghindaran PajakBerganda (P3B) antara Indonesia dan Amerika menyebutkan bahwa:"The rate of tax imposed by a Contracting State on royalties derived fromsources within that Contracting State and beneficially owned by a residentof the other Contracting State shall
Register : 09-02-2016 — Putus : 10-03-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 97 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 10 Maret 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS JOB PERTAMINA - TALISMAN (OGAN KOMERING) LTD;
9669 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • PSC antara laindinyatakan:"The cost accruing therefrom shall be included in operating costsrecoverable as provided in section VI.
    Putusan Nomor 97/B PK/PJK/2015"General and administrative costs, other than direct charges,allocable to this operation should be determined by a detailed study,and the method determined by such study shall be applied each yearconsistently.
    The method selected must be approved byPERTAMINA, and such approval can be reviewed peridacly byPERTAMINA and CNW';"The Last sentence of Article 3.3 of Exibit D the PSC is amended tobe: "The Direct and indirect costs incurred by PHE OGANKOMERING as Operator and TALISMAN in so providing assistanceto Operator shall be charged to the Joint Account and sahall beIncluded in operating costs";Surat Direktur Utama Pertamina Nomor: 947/C.0000/81 Tanggal 5Juni Tahun 1981, antara lain dinyatakan:"berdasarkan
Register : 21-12-2015 — Putus : 26-07-2016 — Upload : 15-08-2016
Putusan PTA YOGYAKARTA Nomor 66/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Yk
Tanggal 26 Juli 2016 — PEMBANDING LAWAN TERBANDING
5118
  • Anh al je ye ll 8 Ga Lelae g) lly GLEAN ae aay das II shall Gli48 Mall cold GO) pl yo tld LHL! GIS yaad EI AI he Glau OS Lage Guede Qu Elelal QANow) 5 AitLalall re aay atlyal jal (Sy Legis aah s JS) Gage atl Jel Gua SN Ode Gn LalArtinya: Sesungguhnya kehidupan suami isteri tidak akan tegak denganHal. 4 dari 7 hal. Putusan Nomor 66/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.
Register : 03-02-2016 — Putus : 24-03-2016 — Upload : 28-04-2016
Putusan PA JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 364/Pdt.G/2016/PA.JS
Tanggal 24 Maret 2016 — PENGGUGAT MELAWAN TERGUGAT
151
  • .,, halaman 15 dari19Wal Qanun halaman 100 yangdiambil alin sebagai pendapat Majelis Hakimsebagai berikut:Cpa lie Cus Eladal 8 SY 9 EI GUAM ae aeidy daa g jl Shall GU...Cee gl ete Cty Asa g iN AB Shall gt Gh uN Cpe GLE Ug Sg) pala G15 Ne ila) GS Lagag..,Sesungguhnya kehidupan suami istn tidak akan tegak denganadanya perpecahan dan pertentangan dan tidak ada kebaikannyamengumpulkan dua orang yang saling membenci.
Register : 10-12-2018 — Putus : 14-01-2019 — Upload : 15-01-2019
Putusan PA JEMBER Nomor 6472/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Jr
Tanggal 14 Januari 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
230
  • merupakanperbuatan tercela, namun begitu dalam keadaan suami isteri sudah tidak salingmencintai lagi dan yang terjadi hanya sikap permusuhan dan saling membencisebagaimana yang dialami oleh Penggugat dan Tergugat tersebut, makaperceraian dibolehkan, sesuai dengan doktrin hukum Islam yang tercantum dalamKitab Figih Sunnah Juz II halaman 248 :Mee E95) Slyadal cae al) all all Gye Gul Gy) Ag Gl Qi dle BLY) Gadosty Ugaldal oi igaes gl Ugg : he jLagitie) Gas 5 dill alga dae EUbiun Y yl walSAS 13 ell gi Soll Cpa Shall
Register : 17-02-2011 — Putus : 12-04-2011 — Upload : 26-05-2012
Putusan PA JEMBER Nomor 731/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Jr
Tanggal 12 April 2011 — PENGGUGAT DAN TERGUGAT
120
  • lySigil) Cua Shall pte UALS! gl GUY lll cL else et oly ilyCUS 9 C95 Cale! gh Ang HN Atk cli) Goal Lal ges Gah ILE ed giLegis CIA CS gall) Jae g Uglied cys Badal! alga Ame GUN Lea sly!
Register : 23-11-2015 — Putus : 15-12-2015 — Upload : 10-06-2016
Putusan PTA SURABAYA Nomor 0361/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Sby
Tanggal 15 Desember 2015 — Pembanding vs Terbanding
2999
  • Musthafa AsSibaisebagai pendapatnya sendiri sebagaimana tersebut dalam kitabnya AlMaratu baina alFighi wa alQanun halaman 100, dalam teks Arabnyaberbunyi sebagai berikut:aS gly SY VI dno al ye Gyo Alla G8 Lilac el Gill 5 GLEAN ae aid Y dan jl) Shall Glscei GI 2S Ge GLb Leal gt OLS Ibs & I jill Ihe lal GS Lagey GQuechie Gn gleial 4 ATsAusLeLl 4x0 ay dill A) Sh Legis ly JS Coe al del Gens) Ge Ge diag jl ENIY 5Artinya : "Bahwa kehidupan suamiisten itu tidak akan memperolehketenangan ditengah perpecahan