Ditemukan 9797 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 19-06-2013 — Putus : 29-10-2013 — Upload : 24-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 373/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2013 —
215112
  • This Policy shall be construed in accordance with Indonesia Law and anydispute or difference between the Insured and the Insurers shall be submitted toarbitration in Jakarta in accordance with the Statutory provision for arbitrationfor the time being in force"(vide Bukti T1)Hal. 7 dari 18 hal. Putusan No.373/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.
    This Policy shall be construed in accordance with Indonesia Law and any disputeor difference between the Insured and the Insurers shall be submitted to arbitrationin Jakarta in accordance with the Statutory provision for arbitration for the timebeing in force";Menimbang, bahwa sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 3 UndangUndang RepublikIndonesia Nomor : 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif PenyelesaianSengketa menyatakan Pengadilan Negeri tidak berwenang untuk mengadili sengketapara pihak yang
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1432/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3911 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • TE at puch ele ents PFev6S ool bo he the oese,special allecation Proc@edares c@sowcling Plane OperatingCocke will be adenred ac Bay be supecorigte.The charges provided foc in SeCEion 8.01 shall ne apegifiadJRbO Carey See meet sa tle Fentraeck gunl sehna tt= iak aero =a eparatsGash calle and debbie nobkes oby Flent uperator and Reid syFIOOUCOre tf aeerdance with lene AGecuneing Pogues e .Such Charges and tiywenes hei) be Subject!
    Putusan Nomor 1432/B/PK/PJK/2017 2,Cash CallsFrom times to tine, ag hececsary, Plant Operator shall cashCall from Producers; and Producers shall pay or cause to bepaid to Blant Operator in os dollars Gheir respectiveShares, separately deternined as Brovided in Secticn 8.01 ofthe Agreement, of Peejected het cash rquirementa For eachof:(a) Plane Operating Costa; and(6) the esets oF Currently Funded Capital Projectsfor @ calendar Benth ef part thereof, as get forth in auchCaeh calls.The cash ealie For
    Plane Operating Casts and Currenclyfunded Capital Projects shall be shown Separately acd shalbe fn sordance With Producers" Jscest Cstingt@s of eachSales COREGack's Zercencage as determined under Aretlele 11of the Agreement, TE curing @ year there Shall be aFeviston in the estimate of a Sales Conteact's Percentage,Cr if the Final determination ef such Sales Conmtrace'sParcentage pursuant te Sectlon Ui.o2 of the Agreement shallFeflect a disetepancy fren the estimates during suck yoar.appropriate
    t oement .Shall be sox by PlatOperator gives.
    of reduced By 8@ amaunt of euchavrege.TS the ertent Feagtieable, Plant Upftater shall place thefunds received porewent be fash calis In interest WES QUART Let 0K Therrien Bh, be cari ewe D1 218= Ota 8+ co9000Tanpga!
Register : 29-11-2013 — Putus : 08-10-2014 — Upload : 03-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-55963/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 8 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13121
  • On Comprehensive Economic CoOperation BetweenAssociation Of South East Asian Nation And The Peoples Republic Of China (ProtKedua Untuk Mengubah Persetujuan Perdagangan Barang Dalam Persetujuan KeranKerja Mengenai Kerjasama Ekonomi Menyeluruh Antara NegaraNegara Anggota AsosBangsaBangsa Asia Tenggara Dan Republic Rakyat China), yaitu pada Annex 3 "RulesOrigin For The The AseanChina Free Trade Area", dinyatakan:Rule 2: Origin CriteriaFor the purposes of this Agreement, products imported by a Party shall
    be deemed tcoriginating and eligible for preferential concessions if they conform to the orrequirements under any one of the following:Products which are wholly obtained or produced as set out and defined in Rule 3; orProducts not wholly produced or obtained provided that the said products are eligible u1Rule 4, Rule 5 or Rule 6.bahwa pada Rule 3, disebutkan, sebagaimana kutipan berikut:Rule 3: Wholly Obtained ProductsWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered as wholly
Register : 19-08-2013 — Putus : 12-06-2014 — Upload : 30-06-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-53051/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 12 Juni 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11920
  • Economic CoOperation Between The Association Of SouthEast Asian Nation And The Peoples Republic Of China (Protokol KeduaUntuk Mengubah Persetujuan Perdagangan Barang Dalam PersetujuanKerangka Kerja Mengenai Kerjasama Ekonomi Menyeluruh Antara NegaraNegara Anggota Asosiasi BangsaBangsa Asia Tenggara Dan RepublicRakyat China), yaitu pada Annex 3 "Rules Of Origin For The The AseanChina Free Trade Area", dinyatakan:Rule 2: Origin CriteriaFor the purposes of this Agreement, products imported by a Party shall
    bedeemed to be originating and eligible for preferential concessions if theyconform to the origin requirements under any one of the following:Products which are wholly obtained or produced as set out and defined inRule 3; orProducts not wholly produced or obtained provided that the said products areeligible under Rule 4, Rule 5 or Rule 6.bahwa pada Rule 3, disebutkan, sebagaimana kutipan berikut:Rule 3: Wholly Obtained ProductsWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered as
Register : 30-08-2013 — Putus : 23-04-2014 — Upload : 28-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-52070/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 23 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11524
  • On Comprehensive Economic CoOperation BetweenAssociation Of South East Asian Nation And The Peoples Republic Of China (ProtKedua Untuk Mengubah Persetujuan Perdagangan Barang Dalam Persetujuan KeranKerja Mengenai Kerjasama Ekonomi Menyeluruh Antara NegaraNegara Anggota AsosBangsaBangsa Asia Tenggara Dan Republic Rakyat China), yaitu pada Annex 3 "RulesOrigin For The The AseanChina Free Trade Area", dinyatakan:Rule 2: Origin CriteriaFor the purposes of this Agreement, products imported by a Party shall
    be deemed toriginating and eligible for preferential concessions if they conform to the orrequirements under any one of the following:Products which are wholly obtained or produced as set out and defined in Rule 3; orProducts not wholly produced or obtained provided that the said products are eligunder Rule 4, Rule 5 or Rule 6.bahwa pada Rule 3, disebutkan, sebagaimana kutipan berikut:Rule 3: Wholly Obtained ProductsWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered as wholly produce.obtained
Putus : 30-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 556/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 30 Juni 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE INDONESIA
4527 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply if thebeneficial owner of the royalties or fees for technical services,being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on business inthe other Contracting State in which the royalties or fees fortechnical services arise through a permanent establishmentsituated therein, or performs in that other State independentpersonal services from a fixed base situated therein, and theright, property or contract in respect of which the royalties orfees
    Royalties and fees for technical services shall be deemed toarise in a Contracting State when the payer is that State itself, aLand, a political subdivision, a local authority or a resident ofthat State.
    Where, however, the person paying the royalties orfees for technical services, whether he is a resident of aContracting State or not, has in a Contracting State a permanentestablishment or fixed base in connection with which theobligation to make the payments was incurred, and thepayments are borne by that permanent establishment or fixedbase, then the royalties or fees for technical services shall bedeemed to arise in the Contracting State in which the permanentestablishment or fixed base is situated
    Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payerand the beneficial owner or between both of them and someother person, the amount of the royalties or fees for technicalservices paid exceeds, for whatever reason, the amount whichwould have been agreed upon by the payer and the beneficialowner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of thisArticle shall apply only to the lastmentioned amount.
    In suchcase, the excess part of the payments shall remain taxableaccording to the laws of each Contracting State, due regardbeing had to the other provisions of this Agreement.7.
Register : 27-08-2013 — Putus : 15-07-2014 — Upload : 29-06-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.54089/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 15 Juli 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12418
  • And The Peoples RepublicOf China, dalam melaksanakan kerjasama ACFTA dimaksud disepakati untuk menggunakan Rule of Origin(ROO) Form E atau Surat Keterangan Asal Barang Form E, yang diatur secara rinci dalam RevisedOperational Certification Procedures (OCP) For The Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free TradeArea;bahwa berdasarkan Appendix I: Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) For The Rules OfOrigin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 7 dinyatakan The Issuing Authorities shall
    Certificate of Origin (Form E), and signed bythe authorised signatory;b) The origin of the product is in conformity with the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA;c) The other statements of the Certificate of Origin (Form E) correspond to supporting documentaryevidence submitted;d) Description, quantity and weight of products, marks and number of packages, number and kinds ofpackages, as specified, conform to the products to be exported;e) Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
Putus : 02-05-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 168/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 2 Mei 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT ANAK TASIK,
25167 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting State shall be taxable only inthat State unless the enterprise carries on business in the otherHalaman 8 dari 29 halaman. Putusan Nomor 168/B/PK/PJK/2016Contracting State through a permanent establishment situated therein. Ifthe enterprise carries on business as aforesaid, the profits of theenterprise may be taxed in the other State but only so much of them as isdirectly or indirectly attributable to that permanent establishment.2.
    Where an enterprise of a Contracting State carries on business in theother Contracting State through a permanent establishment situatedtherein, there shall in each Contracting State be attributed to thatpermanent establishment the profits which it might be expected to make ifit were a distinct and separate enterprise engaged in the same or similaractivities under the same or similar conditions and dealing whollyindependently with the enterprise of which it is a permanentestablishment.3.
    Insofar as it has been customary in a Contracting State, according to itslaw, to determine the p, of its to be attributed to a permanentestablishment on the basis of an apportionment of the total pi of it of theenterprise to its various parts, nothing in paragraph 2 of this Article shallpreclude that Contracting State from determining the profits to be taxedby such an apportionment as may be customary; the method ofapportionment adopted shall, however, be such that the result shall be inaccordance
    No profits shall be attributed to a permanent establishment by reason ofthe mere purchase by '.hat permanent establishment of goods ormerchandise for the enterprise.6. For the purposes of the preceding paragraphs, the profits to be attributedto the permanent establishment shall be determined by the same methodyear by year unless there is good and sufficient reason to the contrary.7.
    Where profits include items which are dealt with separately in otherArticles of this Agreement, thrn the provisions of those Articles shall notbe affected by the provisions of this Article.dalam terjemahan bebas yaitu:Halaman 9 dari 29 halaman. Putusan Nomor 168/B/PK/PJK/2016. Laba suatu perusahaan dari Negara pihak hanya akan dikenakan pajakdi Negara itu kecuali jika perusahaan itu menjaiankan usaha di Negarapihak lainnya melalui suatu bentuk usaha tetap.
Register : 03-01-2017 — Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 18-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 57 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SINARINDO GERBANGMAS;
7261 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For the purposes of this Agreement an individual, who is a member of adiplomatic or consular mission of one of the two States in the other Stateor in a third State and who is a national of the sending State, shall bedeemed to be a resident of the sending State if he is submitted therein tothe same obligations in respect of taxes on income as are residents of thatState;Article 111.
    Notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 2, interest arising in oneof the other Stares shall be taxable only in the other State if thebeneficial owner of the interest is a resident of the other State and ifthe interest is paid on a loan made for a period of more than 2 years oris paid in connection with the sale on credit of any industnal,commercial or scientific equipment.5.
    The competent authorities of the two States shall by mutualagreement settle the mode of application of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.6.
    Thecalculation of this interest rate shall become effective as from the date ofthe loan agreement". Pasal tersebut jelas menyebutkan tingkat bungayang dibebankan dan sejak kapan perhitungan tingkat bunga berlakuefektif.
    Any informationreceived by one of the two States shall be treated as secret in the samemanner as information obtained under the domestic laws of that State andshall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts andadministrative bodies) involved in the assessment or collection of, theenforcement in respect of, or the determination of appeals in relation to, thetaxes covered by the Agreement. Such persons or authorities shall use theinformation only for such purposes.
Putus : 06-09-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1589 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 6 September 2017 — PT. NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
192186 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Provisional payment of ninety (90)percent of the provisional payment value shall be made by Buyerwithin three (3) Business days after the Date of Arrival. At Sellersrequest, Buyer shall make an advance provisional payment toSeller at any time after Concentrates have departed Port ofLoading.
    Failureto be present and/or represented at any weighing, sampling,Halaman 132 dari 186 halaman Putusan Nomor 1589/B/PK/PJK/201 717.sample preparation and moisture determination shall be deemedto be a waiver of the right only in such instance;10.2 Sample Lot. A sample lot of Concentrates shall beapproximately five hundred (500) Wet Metric Tonnes. Weighingand sampling shall be done contemporaneously;10.3 Sample Splits.
    Buyer and Sellershall assay in good faith their respective sample splits and theassay results for copper, gold and silver shall be exchanged bycrossing mail or other mutually agreed procedure. Gold and silverassays shall be made in accordance with fire assaying methods,adjusted for slag losses and cuple absorption. The umpire, whenrequired as contemplated by paragraph 11.2, shall be soinstructed.
    In case thevaniation between the parties assays exceeds the splitting limitsdesignated below, an umpire shall be selected in rotation from thelist designated below whose assay shall be final, provided it is nothigher or lower than the original assays.
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities;11.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Register : 26-11-2013 — Putus : 19-11-2014 — Upload : 04-04-2016
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-57564/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 19 Nopember 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
20754
  • Economic CoOperation Between The Association Of South East AsianNation And The Peoples Republic Of China (Protokol Kedua Untuk Mengubah PersetujuanPerdagangan Barang Dalam Persetujuan Kerangka Kerja Mengenai Kerjasama Ekonomi MenyeluruhAntara NegaraNegara Anggota Asosiasi BangsaBangsa Asia Tenggara Dan Republic Rakyat China),yaitu pada Annex 3 "Rules Of Origin For The The AseanChina Free Trade Area", dinyatakan:Rule 2: Origin CriteriaFor the purposes of this Agreement, products imported by a Party shall
    be deemed to be originating andeligible for preferential concessions if they conform to the origin requirements under any one of thefollowing:Products which are wholly obtained or produced as set out and defined in Rule 3; orProducts not wholly produced or obtained provided that the said products are eligible under Rule 4,Rule 5 or Rule 6.bahwa pada Rule 3, disebutkan, sebagaimana kutipan berikut:Rule 3: Wholly Obtained ProductsWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered
Register : 20-06-2013 — Putus : 10-09-2014 — Upload : 06-04-2016
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-55041/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 10 September 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
28273
  • Februari 2013, terdapat keraguan atas tanda tangan pejabat yangmenandatangani Form E dibandingkan dengan Specimen Signatures of OfficialsAuthorized to Issue Certificate of Origin of The Peoples Republic of China andSpecimen Official Seals dari Shenzhen EntryExit Inspection And QuarantineBeureau of The Peoples Republic of China;bahwa berdasarkan REVISED OPERATIONAL CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR THE RULES OFORIGIN OF THE ASEANCHINA FREE TRADE AREA, disebutkan:Rule 2The Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
    The request shall bemade in writing,accompanied with acopy of the Certificate ofOrigin (Form E) andshall specify thereasons and anyadditional informationsuggesting that theparticulars given on thesaid Certificate of Origin(Form E) may beinaccurate, unless theretroactive check isrequested on a randombasis;i.
Upload : 19-04-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 764 K/PDT.SUS/2010
PT. SAINT GOBAIN ABRASIVES INDONESIA; PT. DAYA SATYA ABRASIVES (Dahulu PT. SAINT GOBAIN NORTON HAMPLAS)
240311 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 764 K/PDT.SUS/2010diselesaikan melalui Arbitrase sesuai dengan ketentuan dari Pasal 17ayat 17.3 dari Commercial Agreement juncto Pasal 3 UndangUndangNomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif PenyelesaianSengketa, yang mana berbunyi sebagai berikut :Article 17 paragraph 17.3 of Commercial Agreement :Any of such Disputes, which can not be amicably settled wthin 30(thirty) days after the matter in dispute has been brought by one Party tothe attention of the other Party, shall be referred
    to and finally resolvedby arbitration in Singapore in accordance wth the prevailing ArbitrationRules of the Singapore Intemational Arbitration Center (SIAC Rules),which rules are deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Article.The Tribunal shall consist of one (1) or three (3) arbitrators as agreedbetween the Parties.
    In the event that the Parties fail to agree on thenumber of arbitrators, the tribunal shall consist of three (3) arbitratorsappointed in accordance wth the SIAC Rules.
    The language of thearbitration shall be English ;Dimana terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesianya adalah sebagaiberikut :Pasal 17 ayat 17.3 dari Commercial Agreement:Segala Persengketaan, yang tidak dapat diselesaikan dengan cara baikdalam jangka wektu 30 (tiga puluh) hari setelah masalah dalamPersengketaan disampaikan oleh salah satu pihak kepada pihak lainnya,maka akan merujuk pada dan diselesaikan secara final melalui arbitrasedi Singapura sesuai dengan Peraturan Arbitrase yang berlaku padaSingapore
    No. 764 K/PDT.SUS/2010Company at Sep 30, 2006 and on such difference has been agreedand accepted by and between SGAFR and the Shareholders ;The Revaluation Difference shall be paid by the Shareholders to SGAFR within 30 (thirty) days as of the expiry of the Option Exercise Periodby wre transfer to the bank account designated by SGAFR.
Register : 16-09-2019 — Putus : 28-10-2019 — Upload : 23-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4039 B/PK/PJK/2019
Tanggal 28 Oktober 2019 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
4419 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Theconstituent material of the outer sole for purposes ofclassification shall be taken to be the material having thegreatest surface area in contact with the ground In determiningthe constituent material of the outer sole, no account shouldbe taken of attached accessories or reinforcements suchspikes, bars, nails, protectors or similar attachments whichpartly cover the sole (see Note 4 (b) to this chapter)5.
    Theconstituent material of the outer sole for purposes of classification shall be taken to be thematerial having the greatest surface area in contact with the ground.
    In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
    Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter :(a The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestexternal surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestsurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch
    Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter :(a) The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestexternal surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestsurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch
Putus : 29-12-2003 — Upload : 23-08-2007
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 025K/N/HAKI/2003
Tanggal 29 Desember 2003 — S.C. Johnson Home Storage Inc.; Abdul Alek Soelystio
372266 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • suatu Negara, adalah sama sekali tidak dapatditerime oleh Pemohon Kasasi oleh karena ketentuanketentuan dalamkonvensi Paris maupun persetujuan TRIPS memang tidak bertentangandengan ketentuan hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia manapun, dalamhal ini, Khususnya UndangUndang Merek.Bahwa sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) PersetujuanTRIPS, negaranegara anagota TRIPS harus tunduk pada ketentuanketentuan dalam Konvensi Paris;Selanjutnya Pasal 1 ayat (1) Persetujuan TRIPS menyatakan bahwa:Members shall
    Membersmay, but shall not be obliged to, implement in their law more extensiveprotection than is required by this Agreement, provided that suchprotection dees not contravene the provisions of this Agreement.Members shall be free to determine the appropriate method ofimplementing... aeimplementing the provision of this Agreement within their own legalsystem and practice.Terjemahan:NegareNega'a anggota wajib memberlakukan ketentuanketentuandalam Perjarijian ini (Persetujuan TRIPS).
Register : 04-06-2010 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.50172/PP/M.XII/13/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
22662
  • waktu di kemudianhari;bahwa berdasarkan penelitian Majelis terhadap pengertian Royalty sebagaimana diaturdalam Pasal 12 P3B Indonesia Australia adalah sebagai berikut :MenurutTerbanding1.2.Royalties arising in one of the Contracting States, being royalties to which a resident ofthe other Contracting State is beneficially entitled, may be taxed in that other State;Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise, andaccording to the law of that State, but the tax so charged shall
    not exceed:(a) inthe case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3(b) and (c), and to the extentto which they relate to those royalties, in subparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%; and(b) inall other cases 15%;The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall by mutual agreement settlethe mode of application of these limitations;The term royalties in this article means payments, whether periodical or not, andhowever described or computed, to the extent to which they are made as considerationfor:
Register : 19-12-2014 — Putus : 24-08-2015 — Upload : 09-09-2015
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 914/Pdt.G/2014/PN Dps.
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2015 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI MELAWAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT & LEISURE (PT. BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY);
13673
  • The arbitration panel shall consist of there (3)Hal. 5 dari 66 halaman putusan perkara Nomor 914/Pdt.G/2014/PN Dps.13.14.arbitrators, one (1) closed by the complainant, one (1) chosen by the respondentand a chairman chosen by the arbitrators named by the complainant and therespondent dalam terjemahan bebasnya berarti: Perselisihan antara para pihakyang muncul dan perjanjian ini atau dari perjanjian lain yang terkait denganperjanjian ini yang tidak dapat diselesaikan oleh Presiden Direktur yangmenyewakan
    The arbitrationpanel shall consist of three (3) arbitrators, one (1) chosen by thecomplainant, one (1) chosen by the respondent and a chairman chosen bythe arbitrators named by the complainant and the respondent;The Parties expressly agree that :(a) the arbitration tribunal shall decide the matter as expeditiously aspossible, and the arbitration shall be complete and the decisionissued by the arbitrators no later than twelve (12) months after thedate of commencement of the arbitration proceedings
    (being thedate of service of the complaint by the party initiating thearbitration), unless the arbitration panel finds good cause to permitan extension of the time for completion;(b) the arbitrators shall only reach their decision by applying strict rulesof law to the facts and shall not purport to resolve any dispute exaequo et bono;(c) the arbitration shall be conducted in the English language;(d) any decision of the arbitration tribunal shall be final, binding andincontestable and no Party shall
    dispute or question the decision ofthe arbitration tribunal before any judicial authority in the Republicof Indonesia or elsewhere;(e) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.Hal. 15 dari 66 halaman putusan perkara Nomor 914/Pdt.G/2014/PN Dps.16The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity;
    14.3 Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until the arbitrationtribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, except in the event ofexpiration, termination or failure by any of the other Parties to obey orcomply with a specific order or decision of the arbitration tribunal,continue to perform all of its obligations under this Agreement withoutprejudice to a final adjustment in accordance with the said award;Terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesia :Pasal 14 ARBITRASI;14.114.2Perselisihan
Register : 07-05-2013 — Putus : 22-04-2014 — Upload : 28-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.52032/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 22 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12023
  • Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2011, dalmelaksanakan kerjasama ACFTA dimaksud disepakati untuk menggunakan RuleOrigin (ROO) Form E atau Surat Keterangan Asal Barang Form E, yang diatur secara ridalam Revised Operational Certification Procedures For The Rules Of Origin Of 'AseanChina Free Trade Area;bahwa berdasarkan Appendix 1: Revised Operational Certification Procedures (Ocp) .The Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 7 dinyatakan Issuing Authorities shall
    of the Certificof Origin (Form E), and signed by the authorised signatory;b) The origin of the product is in conformity with the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,c) The other statements of the Certificate of Origin (Form E) correspond to supportdocumentary evidence submitted;d) Description, quantity and weight of products, marks and number of packasnumber and kinds of packages, as specified, conform to the products to be exportee) Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
Putus : 26-07-2016 — Upload : 14-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1005 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 26 Juli 2016 — JUNANDA PUTJE SYARFUAN, dk VS PT HUMPUSS INTERMODA TRANSPORTASI TBK
940667 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ltd (the "Charterers") ofeach and every obligation of the Charterers of whatsoever nature underor in connection with the above referenced charterpatty (the"Charterparty") and should any breach thereof occur, we herebyundertake to indemnify you immediately upon demand without deductionfor all losses, expenses and liabilities of whatsoever nature that you maysuffer or incur by reason of that breach;Our liability under this guarantee shall be as primary obligor and in noway conditional upon your first
    proceeding against the Charterers.Further, our obligation hereunder is unlimited and shall not be affected byany insolvency (including without limitation, winding up, administration,receivership or administrative receivership), amalgamation,reconstruction, change of name, ownership, control or status of, or anyHalaman 3 dari 25 hal.
    Nomor 1005 K/Pdt/2016legal limitation relating to, by or of the Charterers or any other person,and we shall not be discharged or released from our obligationshereunder by any arrangement or agreement made between you and theCharterers or a receiver, administrative receiver, administrator, liquidator,or similar officer of the Charterers, or by renegotiation, substitution,alteration, amendment or variation (however fundamental) of theobligations imposed upon the Charterers under or in connection with
    proceeding against the Charterers.Further, our obligation hereunder is unlimited and shall not be affectedby any insolvency (including without limitation, winding up,administration, receivership or administrative receivership),amalgamation, reconstruction, change of name, ownership, control orHalaman 13 dari 25 hal.
    Nomor 1005 K/Pdt/2016status of, or any legal limitation relating to, by or of the Charterers or anyother person, and we shall not be discharged or released from ourobligations hereunder by any arrangement or agreement made betweenyou and the Charterers or a receiver, administrative receiver,administrator, liquidator, or similar officer of the Charterers, or byrenegotiation, substitution, alteration, amendment or variation (howeverfundamental) of the obligations imposed upon the Charterers under or
Register : 30-10-2018 — Putus : 24-01-2019 — Upload : 22-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 52/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 24 Januari 2019 — Penggugat:
PT. ASTRA SEDAYA FINANCE
Tergugat:
PT. AMAN CERMAT CEPAT
Turut Tergugat:
KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAM R.I Cq DIRJEN KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL Cq DIREKTORAT MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS
249150
  • Bahwa Article 16 Agreement on TradeRelated Aspects of IntellectualProperty Rights (TRIPS Agreement) menegaskan:The owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right toprevent all third parties not having the owners consent from using in thecourse of trade identical or similar signs for goods or services which areidentical or similar to those in respect of which the trademark is registeredwhere such use would result in a likelihood of confusion.
    The rights described above shall not prejudice anyexisting prior rights, nor shall they affect the possibility of Members makingrights available on the basis Of US@; nnne nnn nne nnn nnnne nnnatauPemilik dari merek dagang yang terdaftar mempunyai hak eksklusif untukmencegah pihak ketiga yang tidak memperoleh izinnya untuk menggunakanmerek dagang tersebut untuk usaha yang sejenis atau menggunakanlambang yang mirip untuk barang atau jasa yang sejenis atau mirip denganbarang atau jasa untuk mana suatu