Ditemukan 614 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 19-08-2019 — Putus : 19-09-2019 — Upload : 25-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 488/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 19 September 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : WEBTOGO GMBH Diwakili Oleh : WILOPO HUSODO SH
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT ASIA QUATTRO NET
225111
  • vi) the Bidder states its compliance with any section or paragraph of this Chapter 1 (Introduction), Chapter 2(Commercial Requirements), Chapter 3 (Technical Requirements and Specifications), but the Bidder negates,modifies, qualifies or restricts (or attempts to negate, modify, qualify or restrict) that statement of compliance, orplaces any conditions or limitations (or attempts to place any conditions or limitations) on that statement ofcompliance elsewhere in the Bidders Proposal or otherwise during
    However,referring to clause 2.2.2, 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 this RFP, the Model shall be only a tool for an equal treatmentevaluation between vendors.In order to achieve the objective of the Model, Bidder shall not:Comply(i) Give different unit price, price erosion and volume discount(ii) Give a lumpsum discount.Any attempt by the Bidder to propose any items mentioned above in its Proposal or during negotiations will notbe considered and will be deemed null and void.""
    Sehingga apabila dikaitkan dengan ketentuanAngka 2.2.14 dalam RFP tentang Price Submission (Pengajuan Harga) yangbersifat wajib (mandatory) telah disebutkan dengan tegas bahwa:...In order to achive the objective of the Model, Bidder shall not:(i) Give different unit price, price erosion, and volume discount;(ii) Give lumpsum discount.Any attempt by the Bidder to propose any items mentioned above in itsProposal or during negotiations will not be considered and will bedeemed null and void.Hal 28 Putusan
Putus : 29-04-2014 — Upload : 29-10-2014
Putusan PN BOJONEGORO Nomor 41/Pid.B/2014/PN.BJN
Tanggal 29 April 2014 — Drs. H. AHMAD.
288
  • DIAN mengatakan kepada saksi ANANG SUJOKO Dik Anangjangan ramerame soalnya ini dari tim suksesnya SBY ga usah kuatir nantikalau gagal uang kembali 100 % dan setelah menyerahkan uang tersebutkemudian saksi Samujil Bin Samuri diberikan kwitansi tanda terima oleh BuDIAN ;Bahwa kemudian pada tanggal 12 Desember 2006 sekira jam 08.00 Wib saksiANANG SUJOKO dihubungi lagi oleh terdakwa melalui telepon danmenanyakan sudah ada uang atau belum dengan mengatakan ki bu dianngekei khabar duwik e wis onok to during
Putus : 12-10-2011 — Upload : 03-08-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 281 K/TUN/2011
Tanggal 12 Oktober 2011 — PT. ARUTMIN INDONESIA vs BUPATI KOTABARU, dkk
9458 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Sembuluan, Sembelimbingan,dan Pantai Baru di dalam Kecamatan Pulau Laut Utara (selanjutnyadisebut "Wilayah Pertambangan Pulau Laut Utara");Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 2 butir 2.4 PKP2B, telah diatur bahwa apabilaKontraktor bermaksud mengurangi wilayah perjanjian, makapengurangan wilayah perjanjian tersebut berlaku 30 (tiga puluh) harisetelah tanggal pemberitahuan Kontraktor kepada Batubara (baca :Perusahaan Negara Tambang Batubara);Pasal 2 butir 2.4 PKP2B tersebut terkutip sebagai berikut :"At any time during
    During such thirty (30) days and for thepurpose of such reduction Contractor and Batubara shall consult witheach other regarding the shape and the size of each individual portion ofthe areas whereby the Agreement Area is to be reduced."
Register : 29-08-2018 — Putus : 29-10-2018 — Upload : 10-05-2019
Putusan PT MAKASSAR Nomor 49/PID.TPK/2018/PT MKS
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2018 — Pembanding/Terbanding/Terdakwa : HENDRIK JAURY, SH Diwakili Oleh : HENDRIK JAURY, SH
Terbanding/Pembanding/Penuntut Umum : FAISAH, SH.MH
12468
  • Perjanjian kredit nomor 2009.167 tanggal 30 Desember 2009.Jenis Fasilitas : Kredit Investasi Interest During Construction (KIIDC).Kegunaan : Membayar bunga KI renovasi Renovasi Mall ofMakassar yang berlokasi di jalan Sungai SaddangKomplek Latanette Plaza Makassar.Plafon : Rp.1.000.000.000.
    Kredit Investasi Interest During Construction :No Tanggal Jumlah Keterangan1. 26 Januari 2010 Rp. 198.987.222. Tahap 2. 24 Februari 2010 Rp. 239.943.796. Tahap I!3. 25 Maret 2010 Rp. 219.257 .944. Tahap III4. 26 April 2010 Rp. 240.884.900. Tahap IV5. 31 Mei 2010 Rp. 100.926.138. Tahap VJumlah Rp. 1.000.000.000. 3.
    Perjanjian kredit nomor 2009.167 tanggal 30 Desember 2009.Jenis Fasilitas: Kredit Investasi Interest During Construction (KIIDC).HIm 14 dari 135 Him Put.No.49/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2018/PT.MKS.Kegunaan : Membayar bunga KI renovasi Renovasi Mall ofMakassar yang berlokasi di jalan Sungai SaddangKomplek Latanette Plaza Makassar.Plafon : Rp.1.000.000.000.
    Kredit Investasi Interest During Construction No Tanggal Jumlah Keterangan1. 26 Januari 2010 Rp. 198.987.222. Tahap 2. 24 Februari 2010 Rp. 239.943.796. Tahap II3. 25 Maret 2010 Rp. 219.257 .944. Tahap III4. 26 April 2010 Rp. 240.884.900. Tahap IV5. 31 Mei 2010 Rp. 100.926.138. Tahap VJumlah Rp. 1.000.000.000. 3.
    Perjanjian Kredit Nomor : 2009.167 tanggal 30 Desember 2009 jeniskredit Kredit investasiInterest During Construction (KIIDC) Plavonsebesar Rp 1.000.000.000, (Satu milyar rupiah);3.
Putus : 21-02-2011 — Upload : 07-09-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 120 B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 21 Februari 2011 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2516 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., milk enriched in vitamins ormineral salts), small quantities of stabilisingagents which serve to maintain the naturalconsistency of the product during transport inliquid state (disodium phosphate, trisodiumcitrate and calcium chloride, for instance) aswell as very small quantities of anti oxidants or10vitamins not normally found in the product.Certain of these products may also contain smallquantities chemicals (e.g., sodium bicarbonate)necessary for their processing, product in theform of powder
Putus : 21-02-2011 — Upload : 27-10-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 35/B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 21 Februari 2011 — PT. NESTLE INDONESIA, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
2214 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., milk enriched in vitamins ormineral salts), small quantities of stabilisingagents which serve to maintain the naturalconsistency of the product during transport inliquid state (disodium phosphate, trisodium10citrate and calcium chloride, for instance) aswell as very small quantities of anti oxidants orvitamins not normally found in the product.Certain of these products may also contain smallquantities chemicals (e.g., sodium bicarbonate)necessary for their processing, product in theform of powder
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1948 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
5121 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Hal ini diketahui dari halaman 5Financial Statement for the year 2006:The company has six managing directors andno employess during period under review.bahwa sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam PER62/PJ/2009, maka badan yang dicakup dalamP3B dianggap tidak melakukan penyalahgunaanHalaman 32 dari 45 halaman.
    ;The authorised share capital of the company amounts to EUR 90,000, divided into 90,000ordinary share with nominal value of EUR 1 eachThe issued and paidup capital amounts to EUR 18,000 equivalent to USD 23,706 per 31December 2006Noncurrent LiabilitiesFacilities from group companies 2006 2005USD USDLimit Drawdown Drawdown663.000.000 161.715.994 162.834.469No guarantees have been given for these loansDirector and employeesThe company has six Managing Directors (20056) and no employees (2005nil) during
Putus : 29-03-2016 — Upload : 17-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 734 K/PID.SUS/2015
Tanggal 29 Maret 2016 — TERDAKWA
6966 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Whatever the theory, theprobationer must often feel that to be placed on probation is it self apunishment ;Bahwa menurut Howard Jones untuk adanya Probation dipersyaratkan halhal sebagai berikut :1) No punishment is imposed initially ;2) The offender is given a fixed period to redeem himself ;3) During this period he is placed under the supervision of a probationofficer (a) in order to keep the court information of his progress, (b) tohelp him to make the best of the opportunity given to him ;4)
Putus : 10-03-2014 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 763/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 10 Maret 2014 — PT. HYUNDAI INDONESIA MOTOR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
5238 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Deletion Compensation in the emount of six Million andFive hundred Thousand United States Dollars (US$6,500,000)which shall be paid partially wthin 4 (four) years after thisAgreement is made and entered into;5.1.2 The parties agree that such payment wil be transferred toHMC through Hyundai Corporation, or such other party asdesignated by HMC.5.2 Running RoyaltyRunning Royalty of One Hundred twenty Dollars (US$ 120) shall bepaid by HIM with respect to each and every licensed Vehiclemanufactured by HIM during
Putus : 04-01-2010 — Upload : 22-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 206 B/PK/PJK/2009
Tanggal 4 Januari 2010 — P.T. NESTLE INDONESIA ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
2915 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., milk enriched in vitamins ormineral salts), small quantities of stabilising agentswhich serve to maintain the natural consistency ofthe product during transport in liquid state(disodium phosphate, trisodium citrate andcalcium choride, for instance) as well as very smallquantities of antiaxidants or vitamins not normalyfound in the product. Cetain of these product mayalso contain small quantities chemicals (e.g.
    No.206/B/PK/PJK/2009(E) Productconsisting ofnatural milkconstituents,notelsewherespecified orincluded ;(F) Butter andother fatsand ailsderiverdfrom milk,dairyspreads ;(G) Cheese andcurd ;The products mentioned at items (A) to (E)above may contain, in addition to natural milkconstituents (e.g., milk enriched in vitamins ormineral salts), small quantities of stabilising agentswhich serve to maintain the natural consistency ofthe product during transport in liquid state(disodium phosphate, trisodium
Putus : 31-07-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1413/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 31 Juli 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
5933 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Te Curing @ year there ghall be aFeviston in the estimate of a Sales Conkract's Percentage,or if the final determination of Such Sales Contrace'sPercentage PUrSouane to Seceiean LL.O2 of Ehe Agrecment shallFeflect a discrepancy froa the eatimates during such year.appropriate adjustments WILE Be made in che amounts ef cashCalled from Producers to the end that the amousts Paid asdto be paid by Producers during and wlth Tespect te such yearrespecting Plant Operating Costs and Currently: FundedCapital
    (Ce AS goon afeer Ehe end of @ach calendac Fear as Ehe hecegsaryinformation becomes available, Plant Operater shallFeconmeile the estinare af each Sales Contract'"s Parcentageuged during such Feac With such Sales Cantrack"s Percentagedetermined in accordance with Sectien 21.62 of theAgreement.Dy TE the cash calls for a given mesth in the aggregate exceedactual expenditures fer said month.
Register : 28-01-2013 — Putus : 20-03-2013 — Upload : 11-06-2013
Putusan PN KUALA KAPUAS Nomor 22/Pid.Sus/2013/PN.K.Kp
Tanggal 20 Maret 2013 — TAHAN J. NUAS
809
  • Saksi EGERIS BIN DURING ALIdibawah sumpah padapokoknya menerangkansebagai berikute Bahwa saksi adalah anggota kepolisian Resor Pulang Pisau.e Bahwa saksi menerangkan tindak pidana BBM tersebut terjadipada hari Rabu tanggal 05 September 2012 sekira jam 16.00Wib bertempat di Jalan Lintas Palangkaraya Buntok DesaBukit Liti Rt. II Kec. Kahayan Tengah Kab. Pulang PisauProp.
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1431/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3712 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • cash ealig for Plant Operating casts and CurrenclyFunded Capital Projects shall be show Separately aod ahalue fn @Gordaace with Producers" Jztast eatinates of eachSales Contrace's rerecentage as determined under Arktlele 13of the Agreement, Te curing @ year there ghall ba arevision in the esti ;imate of a Sales Conkract's Percentage,Or if the Final determination of such Sales Coftface'sParcentage pursuant to Section 11.02 of the Agfeemant shallI re aaFefleecsPeegct a disctepaney frog the estimates during
    such veaappropeiate adjustments witt S# made in the amounts af iAe 5 of cagCalled from Frodyeers fo the @nd that the MROuUAES paid aadco be pai pald by Producers during and wlth TESPOCE Eo such yearFespestir iPeering Plant Operating Casts and Currently FundedCapital Proj fects) ska i reesacly 14ooh & & r eeaq ed a5 Gt ek y a8Pr@ece able iP ch tev ae FA & I d 4 ination.i te iF $0 i d age 28 oO BEL Tri Gambar V.
Register : 18-12-2018 — Putus : 28-12-2018 — Upload : 17-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 417/PID/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 28 Desember 2018 — Pembanding/Penuntut Umum : DRS. YOHANES GATOT IRIANTO, SH
Terbanding/Terdakwa : GAIA AIRLANGGA Bin AHMAD MARZUKI
152126
  • tanggal 18 Oktober 2017 sampai dengan tanggal 17 Oktober 2019dengan jabatan Junior Captain.e Bahwa isi surat, yaitu To Whom It May Concern Number775/HRD/X/2017, tanggal 17 Oktober 2017 atas nama GAIA AIRLANGGA(Terdakwa), adalah:> This is to certify that GAIA AIRLANGGA (62102866) has been workingfor our company as a Pilot (Captain) until October 17th 2017 (Iniuntuk menjamin bahwa GAIA AIRLANGGA (62102866) sudah bekerjauntuk perusahaan kami sebagai Captain Pilot sampai dengan tanggal17 Oktober 2017);> During
Register : 17-05-2013 — Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 27-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Lawan 1. PT. BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2. H. ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA, 3. YUDHA TRISNO, 4. SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA, 5. MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN, 6. PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN, 8. ANKIT PATNI, Penggugat: PT PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Tergugat: 1.PT BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2.H ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA 3.YUDHA TRISNO 4.SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA 5.MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN 6.PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN 7.SUWARNO 8.ANKIT PATNI 9.SKP OVERSEAS PTE,LTD 10.HADI JUANA 11.OLFITRIAN 12.PT CAKRA KARYA BERSAMA 13.PT SOLUSINDO NUSANTARA 14.TRADE CONSORTIUM PTE LTD 15.NOTARIS SITI SAFARIJAH 16.NOTARIS SHELLA FALIANTI,SH 17.KEPALA BADAN KOORDINASI PENANAMAN MODAL REPUBLIK IDONESIA 18.MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAM REPUBLIK INDONESIA
6052666
  • General CovenantsThe Issuer shall at all times, during terms of thisAgreement:(n) annoncement: announce the issuance of theExchangeable Bonds including Pledge of shares forsecure due and punctual peyment of the Bond in the 2(two) daily news.Terjemahannya:7.3.
    General CovenantsThe Issuer shall at all times, during terms of thisAgreement:(a) provision of information and reports: furnishto the Bondholder all of the following, in eachcase with respect to the Issuer:Halaman 181 dari 275 hal.
    General CovenantsThe Issuer shall at all times, during terms of thisAgreement:(g) conduct of business: procure that its and theHalaman 189 dari 275 hal.
    General CovenantsTerjemThe Issuer shall at all times, during terms of thisAgreement;(h) payment of taxes and outgoing: pay and shallcause the issuer and Target Company to payall taxes and outgoing payable when due asrequired by applicable laws and regulations.ahan Tersumpahnya:7.3 Kesepakatan Umum.BahwaPenerbit akan, setiap waktu, selama jangka waktuPerjanjian ini.
    General CovenantsThe Issuer shall at all times, during terms of thisAgreement:(n) = annoncement: announce the issuance of the.Exchangeable Bonds including Pledge ofshares for secure due and punctual paymentof the Bond in the 2 (two) daily newsHalaman 194 dari 275 hal.
Putus : 18-12-2015 — Upload : 29-11-2016
Putusan PN BATAM Nomor 105/PDT.G/2015/PN.BTM
Tanggal 18 Desember 2015 — JOHAN NICOLAAS BLEYENBERG VS PT. SMILING HILL INVESTMENT
200145
  • Bahwa berdasarkan Application For Shares (Aplikasi Untuk Saham) yaknipada Point 3) tersebut diketahui sebagai berikut : understand that the project business plan provides for all earnings to bereinvested over the first three years and that no dividend distributions willmade during this period. Further understand that penalties will apply forany early exit as set out in the proposal documentation.
Putus : 26-07-2012 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2014 K/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 26 Juli 2012 — PT. MEDCOPAPUA INDUSTRI LESTARI VS PT.PANCARAN HALUAN SAMUDERA
166117 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • yang mana disebutkandidalam poin 6 dan 7 peraturan tersebut yaitu:6.Owners ProvideThe Owner shall provide and pay insurance of the vessel, except as otherwiseprovided, and for all provision, cabin, deck, engine room and other necessarystores, including boiler water, shall pay for wages, consular shipping anddischarging fees of the crew and charges for port services pertaining to thecrew, shall maintain the vessels class and keep her in a troughly efficient statein hull, machinery and equipment for during
    the service, and during theservice, and have a full complement of officers and crew;Bahwa bila melihat ketentuan tersebut didalam perjanjian Time Charterkewajiban bagi Pemilik kapal yaitu menyediakan:a.
    Should the Vesseldeviate or put back during a voyage, contrary to the orders or directions of theCharteres, for any reason other then accident to the cargo or where permittedin lines 257 to 258 hereunder, the hire is to be suspended from the time of herdeviating or putting until she is again in the same or equidistant position fromthe destination and the voyage resumed therefrom. All bunkers used by theVessel while off hire shall be for the Owners account.
Putus : 17-09-2013 — Upload : 17-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1234 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 17 September 2013 — PEMOHON VS. TERMOHON
4613 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Anna Maria Sinurat in order to came to the United Stated totake care my kids during the allowed time for her to stay. And wouldguarantee that Mrs. Anna Maria Sinurat will live in the United States with in thegiven time for her to live in the United States. (kti ini tidak dipertimbangkanoleh Pengadilan Tinggi Banten walaupun sudah dijadikan sebagai kti diPengadilan Tinggi Banten).
Putus : 12-10-2011 — Upload : 03-08-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 282 K/TUN/2011
Tanggal 12 Oktober 2011 — PT. ARUTMIN INDONESIA vs BUPATI KOTABARU, dk
8331 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Sembuluan, Sembelimbingan,dan Pantai Baru di dalam Kecamatan Pulau Laut Utara (selanjutnyadisebut "Wilayah Pertambangan Pulau Laut Utara");Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 2 butir 2.4 PKP2B, telah diatur bahwa apabilaKontraktor bermaksud mengurangi wilayah perjanjian, makapengurangan wilayah perjanjian tersebut berlaku 30 (tiga puluh) harisetelah tanggal pemberitahuan Kontraktor kepada Batubara (baca :Perusahaan Negara Tambang Batubara);Pasal 2 butir 2.4 PKP2B tersebut terkutip sebagai berikut :"At any time during
    During such thirty (30) days and for thepurpose of such reduction Contractor and Batubara shall consult witheach other regarding the shape and the size of each individual portion ofthe areas whereby the Agreement Area is to be reduced."
Register : 12-04-2012 — Putus : 22-05-2012 — Upload : 30-10-2012
Putusan PN PURWODADI Nomor 48/Pid.B/2012/PN.Pwi
Tanggal 22 Mei 2012 — SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH bin SU
564
  • Kemudian Rudi (DPO) menelfonterdakwadengan berkata Rif, Mbahe mbok ditulung dibantu telfon Carles,truke mbahe (Sri Suwarni) kecelakaan di Gresik dan terdakwa menjawabYa, InsyaAllah saya telfonkan, karena saat itu terdakwa mengetahui kalausaksi Sri Suwarni sedang bersama sopirnya yaitu saksi Trisno bin Suparberada di Surabaya dan selang tidak berapa lama saksi Trisno bin Suparmenelfon terdakwa menanyakan kepada terdkawa dengan katakata Mas,wis dihubungi Rudi during?