Ditemukan 812 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 27-07-2017 — Putus : 20-03-2018 — Upload : 23-12-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 385/PDT.G/2017PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 20 Maret 2018 — KUI LIM X PT. ASURANSI QBE POOL INDONESIA,Cs
436423
  • Asuransi Royal Indrapura melawan SohadiKawilarang.Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilam Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukumdalam Policy Nomor 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1987dibawah bagian tentang condition telah diuraikan bahwaall differences arising out of this policy shall be reffered tothe decision of arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in difference or if they cannot agree upon
Putus : 06-09-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1588 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 6 September 2017 — PT. NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
19162 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Data/Informasi Internet www.mineweb.com;Freeport to pay Mitsubishi 70 percent more for copperTC/RC Paragraft 4:Reports have said 2009 processing fees betweenMitsubishi Materials and Freeport were set at $75 atonne and 7.5 cents a pound, compared to estimates of$ 45 and 4.5 cents in 2008;Freeport, Jiangxi agree almost 60 percent increase incopper TC/RC Paragraf 3:Large Chinese copper smelters, including JiangxiCopper, received TC/RC of $ 47.2 and 4.72 cents in2008.Big increases in Chinese copper TC
    If the umpires assay is higherthan the higher or lower than the lower of the original assays, themiddle one of the original assays shall be final;Splitting Limits:Arsenic (As) 0.03 percentBismuth (Bi) 0.01 percentAntimony (Sb) 0.01 percentLead (Pb) 0.3 percentZINC (Zn) 0.3 percentFluorine (F) 50 pomChlorine (Cl) 0.005 percentMercury (Hg) 3 ppmNickel (Ni) + Cobalt (Co) 0.1 percentAlumina (Al203) 0.2 percentIf the parties agree to add additional impurities to the list set forthabove pursuant to paragraphs
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities;11.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Upload : 13-07-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 157 K/PDT.SUS/2011
KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA ( KPPU ) REPUBLIK INDONESIA; PT. BERKAH SURYA ABADI PERKASA, DKK.
14392 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In the first,firms agree to submit common bids, thus eliminating pricecompetition. In the second, firms agree on which firm will be thelowest bidder and rotate in such a way that each firm wins anagreed upon number or value of contracts. Since most (but not all)contracts open to bidding involve governments, it is they who areHal. 161 dari 234 hal. Put. No. 157 K/Pdt.Sus/201 1most often the target of bid rigging.
    Hal: 313 (Bukti P3)dikatakan bahwa:A conspiracy must be aimed at bringing about collusive tendering.This is especially the case if the competitors agree to influence theresult of a call for tender for the benefit of one of the participants bysubmitting no tender or only pretend tender (with coordinatedoverpriced bids expecting that the contract will be awarded to thebidder who submits the most favorable offer).
    Instead of competing to submit the lowestpossible tender at the tightest possible margin, the parties mayagree on the lowest offer to be submitted or agree amongstthemselves who should be the most successful bidder:Adapun terjemahan bebasnya adalah sebagai berikut:Tender yang kolusif terjadi ketika para pelaku usaha berkolaborasidalam merespon suatu undangan untuk mengikuti tender untukpenyediaan barang dan jasa.
Register : 07-12-2018 — Putus : 01-04-2019 — Upload : 10-04-2019
Putusan PN BATAM Nomor 322/Pdt.G/2018/PN Btm
Tanggal 1 April 2019 — Penggugat:
PT KARYA SUMBERER DAYA
Tergugat:
1.PT VETCO GRAY INDONESIA
2.PT BERKAH GUNUNG LOGAM
3.PT BILOGAM
9669
  • administered by the Internasional Centre for Dispute Resolutionin accordance with its Internasional Dispute Resolution Procedures, asmodified by ICDR Online Protocol for Manufacturer/Supplier Disputes thenin effect (Please refer to the International Dispute Resolution Proceduresand the ICDR Online Protocol for Manufacturer/Supplier Disputes athttp://www.icdr.org) and ;(ii) If the total amount in dispute is higher than $50,000 (Fifty ThousandDollars), or an equivalent amount in local currency, the Parties agree
Register : 08-11-2021 — Putus : 04-01-2022 — Upload : 04-01-2022
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 1776/Pid.B/2021/PN Tng
Tanggal 4 Januari 2022 — Penuntut Umum:
ADIB FACHRI DILLI,SH.
Terdakwa:
ZAMZAM RHOSEDYA BIN H. SUPENA
273123
  • Mitra Adira Utama Laporan prosedur yang disepakati (Agree Upon Procedure) untuk tahun 2016 2020 dan laporan Auditor Independen; dan
  • 1 (satu) bundel printout rekening koran no rekening 343510502 an. PT. Patra Mitra Bandara dimulai dari April 2017 sampai dengan Februari 2019,

Dilampirkan didalam berkas perkara

  • 1 (satu) unit Handphone Merk Xiaomi type Redmi Note 5 warna hitam beserta Simcard dengan merk dagang XL No 087788238989.
Register : 27-01-2011 — Putus : 08-06-2011 — Upload : 13-10-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 36/PDT.G/2011/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 8 Juni 2011 — PT. MANUNGGAL ENGINEERING >< BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI),Cs
23165
  • /fthe Parties fail to agree upon the third arbitrator wthin such period, the saidarbitrator shall be nominated in accordance wth the BANI rules or such otherrules as agreed between ME and the Contractor."Terjemahan:"Dalam hal Majelis terdiri dari tiga arbiter, masingmasing pihak menunjuksatu orang dan arbiter ketiga dipilin berdasarkan kesepakatan antaraPara Pihak dalam waktiu tiga puluh (30) hari terhitung sejakpenunjukan arbiter terakhir dari dua arbiter yang telah dipilih parapihak.
Putus : 10-03-2009 — Upload : 14-10-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 859 K/PDT/2006
Tanggal 10 Maret 2009 —
207106 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • SohandiKawilarang yang intinya menyatakan :"Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeriharus dibatalkkan dengan alasan Mahkamah Agung sendiri karenaPengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkan hukum ;Dalam Policy No. 49/D0/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawah bagiantentang Conditions telah diasuransikan bahwa All differences arising out ofthis policy shall be referred to the decision of an arbitrator to be appointed inwriting by the parties in differences or if they cannot agree
Register : 09-05-2018 — Putus : 22-05-2018 — Upload : 15-11-2021
Putusan PT SAMARINDA Nomor 56/PDT/2018/PT SMR
Tanggal 22 Mei 2018 — Pembanding/Penggugat I : Yayasan Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen Kalimantan
Pembanding/Penggugat II : HELMI MAULANA
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. BANK PAN INDONESIA, Tbk
Terbanding/Tergugat II : YANSEN DICKY SUSENO,SH
Terbanding/Tergugat III : Cq Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang Kota Samarinda
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : Cq Kantor Pertanahan Kota Samarinda
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat : OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN
11264
  • Putusan nomor 3992/K/Pdt/1986 tanggal25 September 1989 sekali lagi mempertimbangkan bahwa pengakuan utangdengan memberikan jaminan atau acknowledgement of indebtnessandsecurity agreement agree dipandang bukan sebagai grosse akte yangdimaksud dalam pasal 224 HIR. Dari pertimbangan putusan ini, jelas terlihatpendirian MA Republik Indonesia sebagai berikut : Pengadilan berwenangmenilai isi grosse akte.
Putus : 19-10-2017 — Upload : 28-08-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1845 K/Pdt/2017
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2017 — DOUBLE A (1991) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED VS PT ASURANSI RECAPITA
273222 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Despite clause 5.1, the Parties agree to undertake fo fulfill theirobligations in accordance with the terms of this Contract and the timeis of essence.Terjemahan bebas sebagai berikut:5.1. Rencana pengiriman harus sesuai dengan Lampiran 2, jika terjadiketerlambatan produksi pulp, Penjual harus memperoleh persetujuantertulis dari Pembeli untuk perpanjangan waktu. Semua jumlah tonaseyang telah diperjanjikan harus dikirimkan dalam waktu 3 bulan setelahtanggal pengiriman Pulp yang pertama;5.2.
Putus : 31-07-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1413/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 31 Juli 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
5732 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Feos. lo the extent that funds are then held inthe Biadak Poyment Account the Trustee shall, promptly upon reeeiptof notice from both Pertamina and tha Contractors that any suchinvoice has been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Bodak Payment Account the amount of such invoice,pursuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrastors shall agree
Putus : 27-09-2016 — Upload : 12-01-2017
Putusan PT SEMARANG Nomor 298/Pdt/2016/PT SMG
Tanggal 27 September 2016 — FORTUNE FINANCE OVERSEA LTD melawan PT. PANGANMAS INTI PERSADA, dan GOLD COIN SERVICES SINGAPORE Pte., Ltd, dan PT. GOLD COIN INDONESIA
12166
  • Hal ini dapat dilinat padaPasal 1 mengenai Definitions (Definisi), halaman 31, paragraph ke2Perjanjian Kredit Sindikasi No. 159 (vide Bukti P1) yang berbunyi sebagaiberikut:"Scheduled Completion Date: means the date that ProjectCompletion is required to occur pursuant to this Agreement,which date shall be not laterthan the 31st (thirty first) day ofDecember 1996 (one thousand nine hundred and ninety six),unless the Majority Lenders otherwise agree in writing."
Register : 20-05-2019 — Putus : 18-07-2019 — Upload : 09-08-2019
Putusan PT SEMARANG Nomor 298/PDT/2019/PT SMG
Tanggal 18 Juli 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : CATHARINA ANITA EKA SUGITI Diwakili Oleh : EKO BUDIYONO,SH , DK
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Ny. ZUBAIDAH
Terbanding/Tergugat I : WINARNO
13264
  • Hal ini dapat dilihat padaPasal 1 mengenai Definitions (Definisi), halaman 31, paragraph ke2Perjanjian Kredit Sindikasi No. 159 (vide Bukti P1) yang berbunyi sebagaiberikut:"Scheduled Completion Date: means the date that ProjectCompletion is required to occur pursuant to this Agreement,which date shall be not laterthan the 31st (thirty first) day ofDecember 1996 (one thousand nine hundred and ninety six), unless the Majority Lenders otherwise agree in writing."
Register : 26-10-2020 — Putus : 06-04-2021 — Upload : 07-04-2021
Putusan PN Sibuhuan Nomor 8/Pdt.G/2020/PN Sbh
Tanggal 6 April 2021 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
15470
  • alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawahbagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa all differencesarising out of this Policy shall be reffered to the decision of anHalaman 16 dari 61 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 8/Pdt.G/2020/PN Sbh.arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties in diferrence orif they cannot agree
Putus : 06-09-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1589 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 6 September 2017 — PT. NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
194188 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Data/Informasi Internet www.mineweb.com; Freeport to pay Mitsubishi 70 percent more for copperTC/RC Paragraf 4:Reports have said 2009 processing fees betweenMitsubishi Materials and Freeport were set at $75 atonne and 7.5 cents a pound, compared to estimates of$ 45 and 4.5 cents in 2008; Freeport, Jiangxi agree almost 60 percent increase incopper TC/RC Paragraf 3:Large Chinese copper smelters, including JiangxiCopper, received TC/RC of $ 47.2 and 4.72 cents in2008; Big increases in Chinese copper
    If the umpires assay is higherthan the higher or lower than the lower of the original assays, themiddle one of the original assays shall be final.Splitting Limits:Arsenic (As) 0.03 percentBismuth (Bi) 0.01 percentAntimony (Sb) 0.01 percentLead (Pb) 0.3 percentZINC (Zn) 0.3 percentFluorine (F) 50 ppmChlorine (Cl) 0.005 percentMercury (Hg) 3 ppmNickel (Ni) + Cobalt (Co) 0.1 percentAlumina (Al203) 0.2 percentIf the parties agree to add additional impurities to the list set forthabove pursuant to paragraphs
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities;11.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Putus : 12-05-2016 — Upload : 23-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 111 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016
Tanggal 12 Mei 2016 — PT MULTILINE SHIPPING SERVICES VS PT MULTILINTAS AGUNG PERKASA
247144 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., M.H.Biayabiaya Kasasi:Te AGREE sssics conrwecaners axmnmie :Rp 6.000,002. RedakSi ....... eee Rp 5.000,003. Administrasi Kasasi.... :Rp4.989.000,00JUMIAN 00 eee eeeeeeeeeeee :Rp5.000.000,00Untuk SalinanMAHKAMAH AGUNG R.1.An. PaniteraPanitera Muda Perdata KhususRAHMI MULYATI, S.H., M.H.NIP : 19591207 1985 12 2 002 Halaman 59 dari 59 hal. Put. Nomor 111 K/Padt.SusPailit/2016
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1434/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (Persero) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
4827 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • BadakNGL Co. atas cash advance jasa pengolahan LNG.Payment Instruction tersebut diterbitkan atas dasarTRUSTEE AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT(1974): ARTICLE 6Deseussesc=ne ce Worse Koxesreecr=o eocessrro CeanomsS12 Pertermines and the Contractors shall submit to the Trustee 62 FPertamina and the Contesstors shall agree with the Tiqmuefaction (Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of Fumd= Gambar VII. TRUSTEE AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT(1974):c.
Putus : 23-03-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 23 Maret 2016 — PT. FEGA INDOTAMA lawan LVMH FRAGRANCES & COSMETICS (Singapore) PTE. LTD
407360 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • perkara ini sesuai Pasal 2UndangUndang Nomor 14/1970 khususnya memori penjelasanPasal tersebut;(g) Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 794 K/Sip/1982 tanggal 27Januari 1983, yang pada pokoknya menyatakan:"Memperhatikan Policy Nomor 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978(surat bukti P. 1) di bawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikanbahwa all differences arising out of this Policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in witing by the parties indifference or if they cannot agree
Register : 04-10-2011 — Putus : 19-06-2012 — Upload : 29-03-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 535/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 19 Juni 2012 — PT. PRIMA LAKSANA MANDIRI – suatu Perseroan Terbatas yang didirikan berdasarkan hukum Indonesia, berkeududkan di Menara Thamrin Building 19th Floor, Suite 1903, Jln. MH. Thamrin Kav. 3 Jakarta, dalam hal ini memberi kuasa kepada Dr. Maqdir Ismail, SH.LL.M, Dr. S.F. Marbun, SH.MHum, Masayu Donny Kertopati, SH, Ade Kurniawan, SH, Mohammad Ikhsan, SH, kesemuanya adalah advokat pada kantor hukum Maqdir Ismail & Partners, beralamat di Jalan Bandung No. 4 Menteng, Jakarta Pusat, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 18 Juli 2011, yang didaftarkan di Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan pada tanggal 4 Oktober 2011 dengan register No. 2117 /SK/HKM/X/2011, selanjutnya disebut sebagai PENGGUGAT ; M e l a w a n : PT. ASURANSI AXA INDONESIA – berkedudukan di Mayapada Tower 8th Floor, Jln. Jend Sudirman Kav. 28 Jakarta 12920, dalam hal ini memberi kuasa kepada Bipi Prihanggodo, SH.MH, Richard Haullussy, SH.MH, Maria Mismardianti, SH.MH, Ignatius Sape Kota, SH dan Vena Vebtriana, SH, Advokat-advokat pada kantor Konsultan Hukum Prihanggodo Haullussy & Partners (PHP) berkantor di Graha Mandiri Lantai 20 Jln. Imam Bonjol No.61 Jakarta 10310, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 08 November 2011, yang didaftarkan di Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan pada tanggal 10 November 2011 dengan register No. 2405/SK/HKM/XI/2011, selanjutnya disebut sebagai TERGUGAT ;
204146
  • polispolis tersebut yakni :Butir 7 Conditions pada Polis Asuransi Contractors Plant and Machinery ;If any difference arises as to the amount to be poid under this Policy (liability beingotherwise admitted) such difference shall be referred to be the decision of onorbitrator to be oppoidted in writing by the parties in difference or if they cannotagree upon a single arbitrator to the decision of two arbitrator, one to be appointed inwriting by each of the parties or in case the orbitrators do not agree
Register : 03-01-2019 — Putus : 25-03-2019 — Upload : 20-07-2020
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 7/PDT/2019/PT BDG
Tanggal 25 Maret 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat : PT SINAR GALUH PRATAMA
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA VIII
240351
  • melawan Sohandi Kawilarang yang intinyamenyatakan:Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/D0/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diasuransikan bahwaAll differences arising out of this policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in differences or if they cannot agree
Register : 22-03-2010 — Putus : 06-01-2011 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 133/Pdt.G/2010/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 6 Januari 2011 — PT SUPRA INDODRILL >< PT BABAT KUKUI ENERGI, Dkk
20442
  • Put No,.133/PdtG/20 10/P1V.JK1PSTPERTAMINA will consider such request and agree to extend theContract, provided that CONTRACTOR has fulfill all its obligation underthis Contract and its performance in the execution of this Contract hasbeen satisfactorily accepted by PERTAMINA.
    (Bukti TT 05)PERTAMINA will consider such request and agree to extend the Contract,provided that CONTRACTOR has fulfill all its obligation under thisContract and its performance in the execution of this Contract has beensatisfactorily accepted by PERTAMINA.