Ditemukan 30 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Putus : 09-05-2018 — Upload : 21-12-2018
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 717/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Sby Tanggal 9 Mei 2018 — MUHAMMAD FIKRY RIZKI BIN ISMAIL, DKK
31 — 2
31 — 2
Kalimas Baru 3 Langgar 15 RT 008 RW006 Surabaya;Agama : Islam ;Pekerjaan orIl. Nama Lengkap : MOH. SOLEH BIN SUEB;Tempat lahir : Surabaya ;Umur/tanggal lahir =: 22 tahun/ 29 Desember 1995;Jenis Kelamin : Lakilaki ;Kebangsaan : Indonesia ;Tempat tinggal : JI. Kalimas Baru 3 Gg 5 No. 2A Surabaya;Agama : Islam ;Pekerjaan : Swastas (kuli pupuk);Para Terdakwa selama dipersidangan didampingi oleh Penasehat Hukumyakni Sdr.
Register : 18-09-2017 — Putus : 11-10-2017 — Upload : 20-12-2019
Putusan PA SEKAYU Nomor 0831/Pdt.G/2017/PA.SKY Tanggal 11 Oktober 2017 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
19 — 1
19 — 1
Menimbang, bahwa selama terjadinya pisah tempat tinggal antaraPenggugat dan Tergugat sudah tidak ada lagi hubungan baik sebagaimanalayaknya suami isteri bahkan sudah tidak saling mempedulikan bahkanPenggugat tetap dengan sikapnya tidak ingin mempertahankan keutuhanrumah tangganya, meskipun setiap kali sidang Majelis Hakim telahmengupayakan perdamaian;Menimbang, bahwa Majelis Hakim berpendapat perselisihan danpertengkaran antara suami isteri tidak harus dan tidak hanya terbatasdengan cekcok mulut (oril
Putus : 14-08-2012 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan PN BALE BANDUNG Nomor 612 /Pid.B/2012/PN.BB Tanggal 14 Agustus 2012 — ABDUL LATIF AL AZIZ Bin ERWAN HENDRAWAN.
15 — 0
15 — 0
Menetapkan masa Penangkapan dan Penahanan yang telah dijalani terdakwa dikurangkan seluruhnya dari pidana yang dijatuhkan ; Menetapkan Terdakwa tetap berada dalam tahanan; Memerintahkan barang bukti berupa : 1 (satu) unit kendaraan roda 2 (dua) jenis Kawasaki Ninja R warna hitam Nopol D-2029-ZAJ berikut kunci kontak dan STNK asli; 1 (satu) unit Handycam merk Oril RSX; 1 (satu) unit DVD Room external merk Samsung;
Register : 10-01-2014 — Putus : 30-04-2014 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 65 B/PK/PJK/2014 Tanggal 30 April 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. DOWELL ANADRILL SELUMBERGER;
70 — 52 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
70 — 52 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of the interestis a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 percent of the gross amount of the interest.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in one of thetwo States shall be taxable only in the other State to the extent that suchinterest is derived by:i the Government of the other State, including politicalsubdivisions and local authorities thereof; orii the Central Bank of the other State; oril
Register : 06-12-2021 — Putus : 11-01-2022 — Upload : 12-01-2022
Putusan PA Soreang Nomor 7991/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Sor Tanggal 11 Januari 2022 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
21 — 27
21 — 27
Abdurrahman alShabuni dalam kitab MadaaHurriyat alZaujaini fi alThalaq Juz Halaman 83 yang menyatakan sebagaiberikut:ads Sieg Sl Lisdl UL Les of Ml pli Aleyl 5S 352 2 OLdo 878% cla l dlaly ued os Eile V5 Biel i gi gai; a2)oRil ys 35) a5 cle aSSs Sl blks 558% wuyl oy c33 98aJlsall 785 3 ath alb 1385 gallArtinya: /slam telah memilih lembaga wercenien ketika kehidupan rumahtangga mengalami ketegangan dan guncangan yang berat, di manasudah tidak berguna lagi nasihat dan tidak dapat dicapai lagiperdamaian
Register : 23-03-2017 — Putus : 17-05-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 666 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 17 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ORICA MINING SERVICE;
57 — 41 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
57 — 41 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
orscientific equipment; or(c) the supply of scientific, technical, industrial or commercialknowledge or information; or(d) the supply of any assistance that is ancillary and subsidiaryto, and is furnished as a means of enabling the initialapplication of, any such property or right as is mentioned insubparagraph (a), any such equipment as is mentioned insubparagraph (b) or any such knowleage or information as ismentioned in subparagraph (c); or(e) the use of, or the right to use:i. motion picture films; oril
Putus : 27-02-2014 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 736/B/PK/PJK/2013 Tanggal 27 Februari 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. INDOSAT Tbk
359 — 211 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
359 — 211 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
State in which it arisesand according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of theinterest is a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall not exceed10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in one ofthe two States shall be taxable only in the other State to the extent that suchinterest is derived by:i. the Government of the other State, including political subdivisions andlocal authorities thereof; oril
Register : 29-04-2021 — Putus : 05-08-2021 — Upload : 20-08-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 202/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Jkt.Pst Tanggal 5 Agustus 2021 — Pemohon:
PT. BANK QNB INDONESIA TBK
Termohon:
1.PT. CISADANE RAYA CHEMICALS
2.LUSIANA
3.DIANA TJHANG
4.PT. DINARETTA LESTARI
529 — 99
PT. BANK QNB INDONESIA TBK
Termohon:
1.PT. CISADANE RAYA CHEMICALS
2.LUSIANA
3.DIANA TJHANG
4.PT. DINARETTA LESTARI
529 — 99
Enforcement upon an Event of DefaultIf a Determination is required following the occurrence of anEvent of Default under any of the Loan Agreements as towhether the Lenders should:i. accelerate the Loans; oril. enforce the Security,in each case, by reason of such Event of Default, the follozvingprovisions shall apply:(a) the Security Agent shall (at the written request of anyLender):. forthwith give notice of the occurrence of such Event ofDefault to each of the lendersll. request that each of the
Register : 06-08-2014 — Putus : 11-11-2014 — Upload : 12-12-2014
Putusan PA WATES Nomor 410/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Wt Tanggal 11 Nopember 2014 — PENGGUGAT - TERGUGAT
23 — 6
23 — 6
f7bdfTbEFffVbdf7bfL7FfdF7obfL7bELL7OLF7fdf7bLffVbdf7bfL7Cfd7obfL7LLLC7bfL7fdf7ofL7LFL7OELCTFdL7bFL7bdfVbfL7 fdf 7b ff7bdf7bLF7fdf7bLL7CdVbfL7 fdf7bff7LLL7bELL7CdETbLfL7bdL7bLF Vbdf7bffVbdf7bfL7Ffdf7bdf7bdf7bdf7bdf7bdf7fdf/bdf7fbf7bdf7fdf7bdf7 fdf7bdf7bdf7bOO0Of LT LFLLVLEL7LL C7 bOLLVLEEFf7LLL7 LL LTC LEVEL LT bLLTC LE VobL7 CLF 7b LfL7fdf7o LL 7FfdfL7bLCTEdf7bfL7fdf7bLF7LLL7bLL7 LL E7bLL7fdf7bLLTLFL7bLCVLFdL7bL LT LLC Vb LL 7LLL7bOLL TEEf7ofL7fdfL7oLLTELLLTbELLTC LE VOC L7 LLL Vo LL7fdf7oLL TEC L7bOECTEdE/biLTLET/bLEVLeL/SLL (TALE (bot /biL LET bLEVELL/SLE VEL EO EL ELE OrIL
Putus : 12-05-2016 — Upload : 08-03-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 220 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016 Tanggal 12 Mei 2016 — 1. BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI) cq Majelis Arbitrase Ad Hoc dalam PCA Nomor AA461, DK VS PT ASURANSI PURNA ARTANUGRAHA, DK
498 — 443 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
498 — 443 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Nomor 220 B/Pdt.SusArbt/2016Company may immediately, without prejudice to any of Company's rightsor remedies, by written notice to Contractor, terminate the Contract if:e) Contractor breaches any of the terms or conditions of the Contract anddoes not within seven (7) days of services of written notice of thebreach from Company:i) Remedy the breach to the satisfaticon of Company; oril) Take all reasonable actions to eliminate the cause of the breachand to remedy the breach and thereafter to continue