Ditemukan 181 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : teritori
Register : 09-04-2013 — Putus : 25-02-2014 — Upload : 29-09-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.50675/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 25 Februari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13037
  • CoOperation Between The Association Of South East Asian Nation And The Peoples OfChina (Persetujuan Kerangka Kerja Mengenai Kerjasanna Ekonomi Menyeluruh AntaraNegaraNegara Anggota Asosiasi BangsaBangsa Asia Tenggara Dan Republik RakyatChina);Menimbangbahwa berdasarkan Rules of Origin Rule 8 disebutkan tentang Direct Consignmentdisebutkan bahwa :The following shall be considered as consigned directly from the exporting Party to theimporting Party:a) If the products are transported passing through the territory
    of any other ACFTAmember States;b) If the products are transported without passing through the territory of any nonACFTA member states;c) The products whose transport involves transit through one or more intermediatenonACFTA member states with or without transshipment or temporary storagein such countries, provided that:i) the transit entry is justified for geographical reason or by considerationrelated exclusively to transport requirements;ii) the products have not entered into trade or consumption
    there;iii) the products have not undergone any operation there other than unloadingand reloading or any operation required to keep them in good condition.bahwa berdasarkan Revised OCP For the Rules of Origin of the ASEANCHINA FREETRADE AREA Rule 21 disebutkan bahwaFor the purpose of implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, wheretransportation is effected through the territory of one or more nonACFTA Parties, thefollowing shall be submitted to the Customs Authority of the importing
Putus : 17-04-2017 — Upload : 05-10-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 310 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2017
Tanggal 17 April 2017 — TORAY ADVANCE MATERIALS KOREA Inc VS KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU),
542297 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Hal inidikenal sebagai effect doctrine, itupun klaim extraterritorialitas hanya dapatdilakukan sepanjang ada dampak negatif terhadap perekonomian negaratersebut;Dalam tulisannya di www.academia.edu, Neo Tihoaele seorang sarjanahukum dari University of South Africa menyatakan:State sovereignty and jurisdiction are linked to its territory.
    Territory is acondition for a state to exist and a limitation to its rights, a state is sovereignand has jurisdiction only within its territory........ a state may not exercise itspowers in any form in the territory of another state unless there is apermissive rule to the contrary........... The United States has sought toimplement its antitrust laws, the Sherman Act, which has both civil andcriminal features......
    Put.Nomor 310 k/Pdt.SusKPPU/2017"sovereignty is the exclusive right to exercise supreme political authorityover a defined territory (land, airspace and certain maritime areas such asthe territorial sea) and the people within that territory";Terjemahan bahasa Indonesia:"kedaulatan adalah hak eksklusif untuk melaksanakan kewenangan politiktertinggi atas suatu wilayah tertentu (tanah, angkasa dan suatu wilayahmaritim tertentu seperti laut teritorial) dan orangorang yang berada di dalamwilayah tersebut
Register : 30-08-2013 — Putus : 23-04-2014 — Upload : 28-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-52069/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 23 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11920
  • yang pada pokoknya menyatakan seb:berikut:1.Pada Rules of Origin (ROO) For The AseanChina Free Trade Area (ACFTA) fchapter 3 article 3.2 Origin Criteria disebutkan bahwa:For the purposes of this chapter, goods imported by a party which are consigned withe meaning of article 3.8 (Direct consignment), shall be deemed to be originatingeligible for preferential tariff treatment if they confirm to the origin requirements urany one of the following:a) Goods which are wholly obtained or produced in the territory
    of the exporparty set out a as defined in article 3.3 (Wholly Obtained or Produced Goods)b) Goods not wholly obtained or produced in the territory of the exporting pprovided the said goods are eligible under Article 3.4 (Not Wholly ObtaineProduced Goods) or 3.5.bahwa jika diartikan pada article 3.2 chapter 3 tersebut dinyatakan bahwa baik batWholly Obtained (WO) requirement a) maupun bukan Wholly Obtained (Non Vrequirement b) di atas adalah berhak mendapatkan preferential tarrif treatment sepanjmengikuti
    ketentuan article 3.8 yakni "direct consigment" di mana arti direct consignpada article 3.8 adalah "an originating good shall be deemed as directly consigment fthe territory of the exporting party to the territory of the importing party";bahwa pengiriman barang yang Pemohon Banding impor adalah Direct Consignlangsung dari China ke Indonesia.
Register : 10-07-2013 — Putus : 23-04-2014 — Upload : 28-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-52068/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 23 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11827
  • yang pada pokoknya menyatakan seb:berikut:1.Pada Rules of Origin (ROO) For The AseanChina Free Trade Area (ACFTA) fchapter 3 article 3.2 Origin Criteria disebutkan bahwa:For the purposes of this chapter, goods imported by a party which are consigned withe meaning of article 3.8 (Direct consignment), shall be deemed to be originatingeligible for preferential tariff treatment if they confirm to the origin requirements urany one of the following:a) Goods which are wholly obtained or produced in the territory
    of the exporparty set out a as defined in article 3.3 (Wholly Obtained or Produced Goods)b) Goods not wholly obtained or produced in the territory of the exporting pprovided the said goods are eligible under Article 3.4 (Not Wholly ObtaineProduced Goods) or 3.5.bahwa jika diartikan pada article 3.2 chapter 3 tersebut dinyatakan bahwa baik batWholly Obtained (WO) requirement a) maupun bukan Wholly Obtained (Non Vrequirement b) di atas adalah berhak mendapatkan preferential tarrif treatment sepanjmengikuti
    ketentuan article 3.8 yakni "direct consigment" di mana arti direct consignpada article 3.8 adalah "an originating good shall be deemed as directly consigment fthe territory of the exporting party to the territory of the importing party";bahwa pengiriman barang yang Pemohon Banding impor adalah Direct Consignlangsung dari China ke Indonesia.
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 676/B/PK/Pjk/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
3227 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa sesuai dengan dokumen Commission Agency Agreementantara Shiraishi grup dengan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semulaPemohon Banding), diketahui halhal sebagai berikut :Company desires to export certain goods to the territory stipulatedherein and appoint agent as its commission agent under the termsand condition stipulated herein ;Agent is willing to act as a commission agent for companys sales ofthe said products under the said terms and conditions ;Article 3 TerritoryThe territory covered under
    Putusan Nomor 676/B/PK/Pjk/2013ii.iii.IV.Agent shall exert its best efforts to promote sale of products on itsown account throughout Territory ;Before engaging in any or particular advertising for company,such as press advertisement, pamphlets, circulars, exhibitionarrangements etc Agent shall obtain companys approval inwriting ;Agent shall give company all reasonable assistance in advertisingcampaigns to be run by company itself in Territory ;Company shall provide agent fee of charge with all availabledocumentation
    Market trends and competitive situation with respect to sale ofProduct Territory;2. Any complaints on Products;3. Any thirdparty infringement of Companys industrial propertyright ;Agent shall submit to Company the following reports:1. Annual report on sales forecast for the next calender year bythe end of September of each year;2. Semiannual report on the market situation, operations carriedout in the previous period and those planned for theconsequent period, and any importan events ;3.
Putus : 21-01-2015 — Upload : 18-08-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 870/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 21 Januari 2015 — PT. L’OREAL INDONESIA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
22992 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This License is limited to:e = the exclusive right to usee the Technology ande =the Licensed Trademarke the exclusive rights to distribute and sell theLicensed Products in the Territory, andHalaman 7 dari 47 halaman. Putusan Nomor 870/ B/PK/PJK/2014exceptionally outside the Territory to L'Oreal'ssubsidiaries who have specific shortterm needs;2.2.
    L'Oreal shall execute and sign all confirmative deeds anddocuments necessary to comply with formalities which might be required by thelaws and regulations prevailing in the Territory tO make such exploitation rightvalid and enforceable against third parties.Bahwa sesuai dengan yang dimaksud dalam perjanjian, pihak L'Oreal S.A.membebani Pemohon Banding dengan royalti karena Pemohon Banding diberikan hakekslusif untuk memasarkan barangbarang dengan merek dagang tertentu dalam hal inimerk dagang "L'OREAL
    (Bukti PK5):2.1 Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, LOreal grants toLicensee which accepts the exclusive right and license to exploit theLicensed Products in the Territory. This License is limited to:e = the exclusive right to use:the Technology andthe Licensed TrademarkHalaman 21 dari 47 halaman.
    Putusan Nomor 870/ B/PK/PJK/20 1422e the exclusive rights to distribute and sell the Licensed Products in theTerritory, and exceptionally outside the Territory to LOrealssubsidiaries who have specific shortterm needs ;2.2 The right to market the Licensed Products according to the Technologyincludes the exclusive right to exploit the Licensed Patents;Upon Licensees request, LOreal shall execute and sign all confirmativedeeds and documents necessary to comply with formalities which might berequired
    by the laws and regulations prevailing in the Territory to makesuch exploitation right valid and enforceable against third parties;Sesuai dengan yang dimaksud dalam perjanjian, pihak LOreal S.A.
Register : 01-02-2012 — Putus : 25-02-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.43422/PP/M.VIII/12/2013
Tanggal 25 Februari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
138106
  • (jasa perantara) atas pembayaranpemutusan kontrak kerjasama tersebut;bahwa berdasarkan penelitian Majelis atas Sales Representative AgreementBetween PT XXX and PT Tekbora Citra tanggal 8 April 2004, dinyatakan :Angka 2 Appointment2.1 Baker hereby appoints the Representative and the Representative herebyagrees to act as the sole and exclusive representative of Baker for the marketing andpromotion of the sale of the Product and supply of services to customers (other thanexcluded Customers) in the Territory
    6.4, in respect of sales concluded by Baker after termination in respect oforders procured and referred to Baker by the Representative prior to termination ,provided that :(a) Commision will only be due to the Representative on sales of products andorder for Services referred to above in respect of which Baker receives payent infull within 9Odays after termination; and;(b) the righs of Representative under this Clauses 6.2 are subject to the right ofBaker, if any new sales representative in the territory
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 680/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
12735 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (Semula PemohonBanding) telah menerima komisi dari Shiraishi Calcium (Jepang,Thailand, Malaysia dan Singapura) dengan total sebesarRp323.683.893,00;4.2 Bahwa sesuai dengan dokumen Commission Agency Agreementantara Shiraishi grup dengan Pemohon Banding, diketahui halhalsebagai berikut:Company desires to export certain goods to the territory stipulatedherein and appoint agent as its commission agent under the terms andcondition stipulated herein;Agent is wiling to
    act as a commission agent for companys sales of thesaid products under the said terms and conditions;Article 3 TerritoryThe territory covered under this agreement shall be confined to the Tire,Rubber Products, Plastics, Sealant, Printing Ink, Paint, Footwear andother industries in the countries of Indonesia(hereinafter calledTerritory).Article 5 Sales Promotioni.
    Agent shall exert its best efforts to promote sale of products on itsow account throughout Territory;ii. Before engaging in any or particular advertising for company, suchas press advertisement, pamphlets, circulars, exhibitionarrangements etc Agent shall obtain companys approval in witing;Halaman 14dari 26 halaman.
    Putusan Nomor680/B/PK/PJK/2013ilivAgent shall give company all reasonable assistance in advertisingcampaigns to be run by company itself in Territory;Company shall provide agent fee of charge wth all availabledocumentation required to exercise agent bussiness. Suchdocumentation shall include catalogues, pamphlets, price lists,companys general terms and conditions of sale, contract formsused by company etc;Article 6 Information and Reporta.b.Agent shall inform Company of the following matters:1.
    Market trends and competitive situation wth respect to sale ofProduct Territory;2. Any complaints on Products;3. Any thirdparty infringement of Companys industnal property right.Agent shall submit to Company the following reports:1. Annual report on sales forecast for the next calender year by theend of September of each year;2. Semiannual report on the market situation, operations carried outin the previous period and those planned for the consequentperiod, and any importan events;3.
Putus : 28-11-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 399/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 28 Nopember 2013 — PT. L’OREAL INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
6780 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • . :2.1 Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, L'Oreal grants toLicensee which accepts the exclusive right and license to exploit theLicensed Products in the Territory.
    This License Is limited to : the exclusive right to use the Technology and the Licensed Trademark the exclusive rights to distribute and sell the Licensed Products in theTerritory, and exceptionally outside the Territory to L'Oreal's subsidiarieswho have specific shortterm needs.2.2 The right to market the Licensed Products according to the Technologyincludes the exclusive right to exploit the Licensed Patents.Upon Licensee's request.
    Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, L'Orealgrants to Licensee which accepts the exclusive right and licenseto exploit the Licensed Products in the Territory. This License islimited to: the exclusive right to use:the Technology andthe Licensed Trademark the exclusive rights to distribute and sell the LicensedProducts in the Territory, and exceptionally outside theTerritory to L'Oreal's subsidiaries who have specificshortterm needs.3)2.
    Putusan Nomor 399/B/PK/PJK/2013products in the territory PT. LOreal Indonesia CustomersPurchaseLicenseLicenseasulor IndonesiaLicense Manufacturer)Ba an PT. L'Oreal Indonesia.
    L'Oreal Indonesia, PTYasulor Indonesia dan L'Oreal S.A, France, dalam hal hakEksklusif untuk mengeksploitasi produk dengan merk dagangL'Oreal sebagai berikut:L'Oreal, S.A, FranceProvides Licenses to EXPLOIT the Lisenced ProductThis License is limited to: exclusive right to use Technology exclusive right to use licensed trademark exclusive right distribute and sell the licensedproducts in the territory PT.
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 677/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS P.T.SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
2931 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa sesuai dengan dokumen Commission Agency Agreementantara Shiraishi grup dengan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali(semula Pemohon Banding), diketahui halhal sebagai berikut :Company desires to export certain goods to the territory stipulatedherein and appoint agent as its commission agent under the termsand condition stipulated herein.Agent is willing to act as a commission agent for companys sales ofthe said products under the said terms and conditions.Article 3 TerritoryThe territory covered under
    this agreement shall be confined to theTire, Rubber Products, Plastics, Sealant, Printing Ink, Paint,Footwear and other industries in the countries ofIndonesia(hereinafter called Territory).Article 5 Sales Promotion.
    Market trends and competitive situation with respect to sale ofProduct Territory;2. Any complaints on Products;3. Any thirdparty infringement of Companys industrial propertyright.a. Agent shall submit to Company the following reports:71. Annual report on sales forecast for the next calender year bythe end of September of each year;2. Semiannual report on the market situation, operationscarried out in the previous period and those planned for theconsequent period, and any importan events.3.
Register : 30-05-2013 — Putus : 16-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-56165/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13527
  • Consumption There; and (iii) TheProducts Have Not Undergone Any Operation There Other Than Unloadingand Reloading or any Other Operation to Preserve Them in Good Condition, bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A,Revised Operational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin ofthe ASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: ForThe Purpose of Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,Where Transportation is Effected Trough the Territory
    orConsumption There; and (iii) The Products Have Not Undergone Any OperationThere Other Than Unloading and Reloading or any Other Operation to PreserveThem in Good Condition.bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A, RevisedOperational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin of theASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: For The Purposeof Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, WhereTransportation is Effected Trough the Territory
Register : 13-11-2013 — Putus : 16-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-56166/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13730
  • Consumption There; and (iii) TheProducts Have Not Undergone Any Operation There Other Than Unloadingand Reloading or any Other Operation to Preserve Them in Good Condition, bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A,Revised Operational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin ofthe ASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: ForThe Purpose of Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,Where Transportation is Effected Trough the Territory
    orConsumption There; and (iii) The Products Have Not Undergone Any OperationThere Other Than Unloading and Reloading or any Other Operation to PreserveThem in Good Condition.bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A, RevisedOperational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin of theASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: For The Purposeof Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, WhereTransportation is Effected Trough the Territory
Register : 08-09-2020 — Putus : 14-10-2020 — Upload : 09-11-2020
Putusan PN KENDAL Nomor 118/Pid.B/2020/PN Kdl
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2020 — Penuntut Umum:
D. BRAMANDOKO
Terdakwa:
Nanang Sulistiyo Alias Pendek Alias Ompong Bin Alm. Junaedi
6412
  • 1 (satu) buah masker warna hijau dengan tali warna merah putih;
  • 1 (satu) buah celurit beserta sarungnya;
  • 1 (satu) buah jaket model jemper warna abu abu kombinasi hitam bertuliskan LDN TERRITORY dengan merk JORSO.
    Sumber Alfaria Trijaya (Alfamart CabangTambakrejo Kendal) melalui saksi ELVIN NUR SIFA Bin FAHRUR7. 1 (Satu) buah kunci Y;8. 1 (satu) buah masker warna hijau dengan tali warna merah putih;Halaman 2 dari 24 Putusan Nomor 118/Pid.B/2020/PN.Kadl9. 1 (Satu) buah celurit beserta sarungnya;10. 1 (Satu) buah jaket model jemper warna abu abu kombinasi hitambertuliskan LDN TERRITORY dengan merk JORSO.11. 1 (Satu) pasang sandal jepit merk SWALLOW warna ungu;12. 1 (Satu) potong pecahan eternit warna putih;13
    bukti;Menimbang, bahwa untuk menguatkan dakwaanya Penuntut Umummengajukan barang bukti sebagai berikut:1. 1 (Satu) unit sepeda motor Honda Scoopy Nopol H5768AYD warna abuabu noka : MH1JM3118JK993054, nosin : JM31E1989103 beserta kuncikontak asli;1 (Satu) buah kunci Y;1 (Satu) buah kaos tangan warna hijau putih orange.1 (Satu) buah masker warna hijau dengan tali warna merah putih;1 (Satu) buah celurit beserta sarungnya;oe1 (satu) buah jaket model jemper warna abu abu kombinasi hitambertuliskan LDN TERRITORY
    Sumber AlfariaTrijaya (Alfamart Cabang Tambakrejo Kendal) melalui saksi ELVIN NUR SIFABin FAHRUR;1 (Satu) buah kunci Y;1 (Satu) buah kaos tangan warna hijau putih orange.1 (Satu) buah masker warna hijau dengan tali warna merah putih;1 (Satu) buah celurit beserta sarungnya;1 (satu) buah jaket model jemper warna abu abu kombinasi hitambertuliskan LDN TERRITORY dengan merk JORSO.1 (Satu) pasang sandal jepit merk SWALLOW warna ungu;1 (Satu) potong pecahan eternit warna putih;2 (dua) buah baut yang terbuat
    Sumber Alfaria Trijaya (Alfamart CabangTambakrejo Kendal) melalui saksi ELVIN NUR SIFA Bin FAHRUR7. 1 (Satu) buah kunci Y;8. 1 (Satu) buah kaos tangan warna hijau putih orange.9. 1 (Satu) buah masker warna hijau dengan tali warna merah putih;10.1 (Satu) buah celurit beserta sarungnya;11.1 (Satu) buah jaket model jemper warna abu abu kombinasi hitambertuliskan LDN TERRITORY dengan merk JORSO.12.1 (Satu) pasang sandal jepit merk SWALLOW warna ungu;13.1 (Satu) potong pecahan eternit warna putih;14.2
Putus : 26-08-2010 — Upload : 31-10-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 91 /B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 26 Agustus 2010 —
2213 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor91/B/PK/PJK/201020Revenue shall not be earned by any Member of theOracle Group who is made party to the contract solelyas a matter of convenience to the Sublicensee ;For sublicenses granted through a Corporate Account,the sublicenserevenue shall be earned as agreed, or in the absenceof an agreement, one hundred percent (100%) by theMember of the Oracle Group in whose Territory theProgram is installed or used, and zero percent (0%) bythe Member of the Oracle Group who is responsible formanaging
    ofCorporate Accounts, as revised from time to time ;For sublicenses granted through a designated GlobalAccount, thesublicense revenue shall be earned as agreed, or inthe absence of anagreement, one hundred percent (100%) by the Member ofthe OracleGroup who is responsible for managing the relationshipwith the GlobalAccount, normally the Member of the Oracle Group whois a party to thecontract with the Global Account granting thesublicense, and zero percent (0%) by the Member of theOracle Group in whose territory
    Global Account shall mean thosemultiple Jurisdiction strategic agreements sodesignated by an Executive Vice President at thebeginning of the fiscal year and included in theGlobal Accounts list ;For sublicenses granted through a Subdistributor otherthan a CorporateAccount or Global Account, the sublicense revenueshall be earned asagreed, or in the absence of an agreement, seventyfive percent (75%) by the Member of the Oracle Groupin whose Territory the Program is installed or used,and twentyfive percent
Register : 06-10-2011 — Putus : 12-10-2011 — Upload : 24-05-2012
Putusan PA JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 189/Pdt.P/2011/PA JS.
Tanggal 12 Oktober 2011 — dr. Hj. KUSSAMBUDIARTI binti KOESMAN SOEMOTENOJO.dkk
514
  • terakhir: Hakim Agung pada Mahkamah Agung RepublikIndonesia, bertempat tinggal terakhir di Jalan Bacang nomor 32, RT. 08 RW. 01,Kelurahan Jati Padang, Kecamatan Pasar Minggu, Kota Jakarta Selatan sesuaidengan Surat Keterangan Kematian Penduduk WNI dari Kelurahan Jati Padang,Kecamatan Pasar Minggu, Kota Jakarta Selatan nomor 3174111071100012tertanggal 11 Juli 2011 dan Death Certificate, Registration Number 20057589,Date 30/ 06/ 2011 yang dikeluarkan oleh Registrar Generals Office, AustralianCapital Territory
    1971 yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Urusan Agama KecamatanGubeng, Kotamadya Surabaya;c Fotokopi Akta Kelahiran untuk anak bernama PRAMITHA JURISTYARINI,HENDRA YURISTIAWAN dan IRMA YURISTIARINLd Fotokopi Surat Keterangan Kematian Penduduk WNI dari Kelurahan JatiPadang, Kecamatan Pasar Minggu, Kota Jakarta Selatan nomor3174111071100012 tertanggal 11 Juli 2011;e Fotokopi Death Certificate, Registration Number 20057589, Date 30/ 06/2011 yang dikeluarkan oleh Registrar Generals Office, Australian Capital Territory
Putus : 06-06-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 288/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 6 Juni 2016 — PT. SOUTH PACIFIC VISCOSE VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
16241 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Berdasarkan Agency agreement Pemohon Banding dan LenzingAktiengesellschaft, India Branch office diketahui bahwa Lenzing Indiaadalah agen penjualan, marketing dan mempromosikan produk PemohonBanding di India;Beberapa bagian isi Agreement:2.1 Subject to the term and conditions of this agreement, SPVappoints the agent (lenzing) as its exclusive agent for the sale,marketing and promotion of the products to customers located inthe territory;3.1.
    The agent shall: solicit orders and receive enquiries/buying offersfrom customers in the territory, and give all reasonable assistanceto SPV for the sale of the products in the territory.
    The agent shallassist and support SPV in all its business activities in the territoryand is obliged to supply SPV with all relative market informationpertaining to the territory on a regular basis e.g. current marketprices, competitors activities, customer investments, details ofcustomers and prospective customers;c.
Putus : 06-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1810/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 6 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs
2817 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Penyerahan BKP/JKPatas proyek di Gunung Kidul, yaitu The Project for Water Supply in GunungKidul Regency of Yogyakarta Special Territory (GK Phase 2 N75). Atas sisapembayaran proyek tersebut sampai saat ini belum pernah dilaporkan di SPTPPN dan belum diterbitkan faktur pajaknya;Bahwa koreksi positif atas faktur pajak masukan yang tidak dapat dikreditkansebesar Rp.29.194.569.199,00 karena: Adanya kesalahan penulisan nilai nominal PPN untuk faktur pajak masukanyang diterbitkan oleh CV.
    Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula Terbanding)saat pemeriksaan melakukan koreksi karena berdasarkanpenelitian terhadap dokumen Termohon Peninjauan Kembali(semula Pemohon Banding) dan SPT PPN Masa Desember2009, terdapat penyerahan BKP dan/atau JKP yang PajakPertambahan Nilainya tidak dipungut yang tidak dilaporkanoleh Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula PemohonBanding) yaitu penyerahan BKP/JKP atas proyek di GunungKidul yaitu The Project for Water Supply in Gunung KidulRegency of Yogyakarta Special Territory
    Yaitu. penyerahanBKP/JKP atas proyek di Gunung Kidul yaitu TheProject for Water Supply in Gunung Kidul Regency ofYogyakarta Special Territory (GKPhase 2 N75);Bahwa berdasarkan Daftar Temuan Pemeriksaandiketahui perincian nilai proyek yang belum dilaporkansebagai omset PPN Masa sebagai berikut:Total Nilai Proyek Rp.47.461.080.600,00Dikurangi:Dilaporkan dalam SPT PPN Masa Juli 2008 =(Rp.19.187.030.880,00)Sesuai dengan LAP19/WPJ.07/KP.0700/2010(Pemeriksaan masa Januari sd April 2009) (Rp.25.845.086.928,00
    Putusan Nomor 1810/B/PK/PJK/201 75.5.5.6.5.7.5.8.PPNnya tidak dipungut yang tidak/belum dilaporkan olehTermohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding)meskipun proyek itu sudah selesai, yakni PenyerahanBKP/JKP atas proyek di Gunung Kidul, yaitu "The Project forWater Supply in Gunung Kidul Regency of YogyakartaSpecial Territory (GK Phase 2 N75)".Bahwa faktanya, berdasarkan risalah pembahasan akhir hasilpemeriksaan, dapat diketahui dengan jelas bahwa TermohonPeninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding
Putus : 18-12-2013 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 681/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 18 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
12928 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • atas, dapat Pemohon PeninjauanKembali (semula Terbanding) sampaikan tanggapan sebagai berikut :1 Bahwa Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding)telah menerima komisi dari Shiraishi Calcium (Jepang, Thailand,Malaysia dan Singapura) dengan total sebesar Rp 42.155.614,00.2 Bahwa sesuai dengan dokumen Commission Agency Agreement antaraShiraishi grup dengan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula PemohonBanding), diketahui halhal sebagai berikut :Company desires to export certain goods to the territory
    stipulated hereinand appoint agent as its commission agent under the terms and conditionstipulated herein.Agent is willing to act as a commission agent for companys sales of the saidproducts under the said terms and conditions.Article 3 TerritoryThe territory covered under this agreement shall be confined to the Tire,Rubber Products, Plastics, Sealant, Printing Ink, Paint, Footwear and otherindustries in the countries of Indonesia(hereinafter called Territory).Article 5 Sales Promotioni Agent shall
Register : 22-06-2021 — Putus : 19-08-2021 — Upload : 19-08-2021
Putusan PN PEKANBARU Nomor 655/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2021 — Penuntut Umum:
ERIK RUSNANDAR, SH
Terdakwa:
HADY ERAWAN als HADY
19051
  • 1 (satu) set fc dokumen Agreement for the Audio-Visual Exploitation of the Live Package in the Territory of Indonesia & East Timor tahun 2018.
  • 1 (satu) set dokumen Perjanjian Pemanfaatan Audio Visual Paket Siaran Langsung di Wilayah Indonesia dan Timor Timur tahun 2018.
  • 3 (tiga) lembar fc Kartu Tanda Penduduk (KTP) a.n Abdian Wijaya, Charly S.Maruli Samosir dan Anugrah Tri Hapsoro Aji.
  • 2 (dua) lembar fc kartu berlangganan TV Kabel PT.
  • 1 (satu) set fc dokumen Agreement for the Audio-Visual Exploitation of the Live Package in the Territory of Indonesia & East Timor tahun 2018.
  • 1 (satu) set dokumen Perjanjian Pemanfaatan Audio Visual Paket Siaran Langsung di Wilayah Indonesia dan Timor Timur tahun 2018.
  • 3 (tiga) lembar fc Kartu Tanda Penduduk (KTP) a.n Abdian Wijaya, Charly S.Maruli Samosir dan Ishak H.Pardosi.
  • 2 (dua) lembar fc kartu berlangganan TV Kabel PT.
    GlobalMedia Visual Nomor AHUAH.01.030217009 tanggal 29 Juni 2018.e1 (set) fc Surat peringatan/somasi no.032/MRGA/SOM/VIII/2019tanggal 28 Agustus 2019 dan lampiran surat kuasa tertanggal 16Agustus 2019.e1 (set) fc surat peringatan/somasi no.056/M RGA/SOM/VIII/2019tanggal 03 September 2019.e1 (satu) set fe surat undangan penyelesaian secara damai No.120 /MRGA/LETT/IX/2019 tanggal 30 September 2019. 1 (Satu) set fe dokumen Agreement for the AudioVisual Exploitationof the Live Package in the Territory
    GlobalMedia Visual Nomor AHUAH.01.030217009 tanggal 29 Juni 2018.e1 (set) fc surat peringatan/somasi no.032/MRGA/SOM/VIII/2019tanggal 28 Agustus 2019 dan lampiran surat kuasa tertanggal 16Agustus 2019.e1 (set) fc Surat peringatan/somasi no.056/M RGA/SOM/VIII/2019tanggal 03 September 2019.1 (satu) set fe surat undangan penyelesaian secara damai No.120 /MRGA/LETT/IX/2019 tanggal 30 September 2019. 1 (satu) set fe dokumen Agreement for the AudioVisual Exploitationof the Live Package in the Territory
    GlobalMedia Visual Nomor AHUAH.01.030217009 tanggal 29 Juni 2018.e1 (Set) fc surat peringatan/somasi no.032/MRGA/SOM/VIII/2019tanggal 28 Agustus 2019 dan lampiran surat kuasa tertanggal 16Agustus 2019.e1 (set) fc surat peringatan/somasi no.056/M RGA/SOM/VIII/2019tanggal 03 September 2019.e1 (satu) set fe surat undangan penyelesaian secara damai No.120 /MRGA/LETT/IX/2019 tanggal 30 September 2019. 1 (Satu) set fe dokumen Agreement for the AudioVisual Exploitationof the Live Package in the Territory
    PT.Global Media Visual Nomor AHUAH.01.030217009 tanggal 29Juni 2018.. 1 (set) fc surat peringatan/somasi no.032/MRGA/SOM/VIII/2019 tanggal 28 Agustus 2019 dan lampiran suratkuasa tertanggal 16 Agustus 2019. 1 (Set) fc surat peringatan/somasi no.056/MRGA/SOM/VIII/2019 tanggal 03 September 2019. 1 (Satu) set fc surat undangan penyelesaian secara damaiNo. 120 /MRGA/LETT/IX/2019 tanggal 30 September 2019.. 1 (satu) set fc dokumen Agreement for the AudioVisualExploitation of the Live Package in the Territory
Putus : 19-03-2014 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 692/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 19 Maret 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SHIRAISHI CALCIUM INDONESIA
12239 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa sesuai dengan dokumen Commission Agency Agreement antaraShiraishi grup dengan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semulaPemohon Banding), diketahui halhal sebagai berikut :Company desires to export certain goods to the territory stipulatedherein and appoint agent as its commission agent under the terms andcondition stipulated herein.Agent is willing to act as a commission agent for companys sales of thesaid products under the said terms and conditions.Article 3 TerritoryThe territory covered under
    Market trends and competitive situation wth respect to sale ofProduct Territory;2. Any complaints on Products;3. Any thirdparty infringement of Companys industrial propertyright.b. Agent shall submit to Company the followng reports:1. Annual report on sales forecast for the next calender year by theend of September of each year;2. Semiannual report on the market situation, operations carriedout in the previous period and those planned for the consequentperiod, and any importan events.3.