Ditemukan 9157 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : moch muh mutu muka musa
Pengadilan DILMIL III 16 MAKASSAR Pidana Umum Penipuan
Register : 27-01-2014 — Putus : 27-02-2014 — Upload : 06-05-2014
Putusan DILMIL III 16 MAKASSAR Nomor 15-K/PM.III-16/AD/I/2014
Tanggal 27 Februari 2014 — SERKA EDDY HARYANTO
81 — 37
  • Mayor Chk NRP. 636364sebagai Hakim Ketua, serta Much. Suyanto, S.H., M.H., Mayor Chk NRP. 544973 danNunung Hasanah S.H., M.H. Mayor Chk (K) NRP. 11970027910670 masingmasingsebagai Hakim Anggota dan sebagai Hakim Anggota II yang diucapkan pada hari dantanggal yang sama oleh Hakim Ketua dalam sidang terbuka untuk umum dengan dihadirioleh para Hakim Anggota tersebut diatas, Oditur Militer Sulaiman, S.H.
Pengadilan PN CIBADAK Pidana Khusus Narkotika dan Psikotropika
Register : 27-08-2020 — Putus : 23-09-2020 — Upload : 09-08-2021
Putusan PN CIBADAK Nomor 226/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Cbd
Tanggal 23 September 2020 — Penuntut Umum:
1.ALFIAN,SH.MH.
2.WARDIANTO, SH.
Terdakwa:
YANDI bin UJANG SUPRIATNA
25 — 5
  • Perpanjangan Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Cibadak 26 September 2020 sampaidengan tanggal 24 Nopember 2020;Terdakwa dalam perkara ini didampingi MUCH. UJANG, SH. dkk dariPerkumpulan Lembaga dan Penasihat Hukum Elang Pasundan berdasarkanPenetapan Nomor: 226/Pen.Pid/PH/2020/PN Cbd tanggal 2 September 2020;Pengadilan Negeri tersebut;Setelah membaca: Penetapan Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Cibadak Nomor: 200/Pid.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 24-07-2013 — Upload : 21-10-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1217 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 24 Juli 2013 — MACHMUDI vs PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA Cq. MENTERI DALAM NEGERI Cq. GUBERNUR KEPALA DAERAH TINGKAT I JAWA TIMUR Cq. WALIKOTAMADYA PEMERINTAH KOTA SURABAYA Cq. CAMAT PEMERINTAH KECAMATAN BENOWO Cq. LURAH PEMERINTAH KELURAHAN SEMEMI
33 — 18 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Hakim Telah Melampaui Batas Kewenangan;1.Dalam kesimpulan Majelis Hakim halaman 53 yang berbunyitanah tersebut adalah tanah Desa sejak tahun 1937" ternyataketiga orang Saksi (Much. Munir, Mukmin dan Abdul Majid)dalam keterangan pada halaman 36,37 dan 38 tidak ada satupunyang menerangkan bahwa tanah tersebut adalah tanah Desasejak tahun 1937.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 16-09-2019 — Putus : 28-10-2019 — Upload : 23-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4039 B/PK/PJK/2019
Tanggal 28 Oktober 2019 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
49 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The size of the uppers variesvery much between different types of footwear, Fai those covering the foot and the wholeleg, including the thigh (for example, fishermens boots), to those which consist simply ofstraps or thongs (for example, savisiyIf the upper consists of two or more materials, classification is determined by theconstituent material which has the cat external surface area, no account being taken ofaccessories or reinforcements such as ankle patches, protective or omamental strips oredging
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 15-01-2020 — Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 27-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 508 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
81 — 60 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The size of the uppers variesvery much between different types of footwear, from those covering the foot and the wholeleg, including the thigh (for example, fishermens boots), to those which consist simply ofstraps or thongs (for example, sandals),if the upper consists of two or more materials, classification is determined by theconstituent material which has the prestest external surface area, no account being taken ofaccessories or reinforcements such as ankle patches, protective or cmamental strips
Pengadilan PN BANYUMAS Pidana Umum Pencurian
Register : 06-03-2017 — Putus : 03-05-2017 — Upload : 24-08-2017
Putusan PN BANYUMAS Nomor 21/Pid.B/2017/PN Bms
Tanggal 3 Mei 2017 — Penuntut Umum : YUGO SUSANDI, SH. Terdakwa : KHUSAENI bin H. DULAH SIRAIT
48 — 12
  • Saksi AFNAD TAMZIS Bin MUCH.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 16-09-2019 — Putus : 29-10-2019 — Upload : 21-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4024 B/PK/PJK/2019
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2019 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
86 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The size of the uppers variesvery much between different types of footwear, from those covering the foot an the wholeleg, including the thigh (for example, fishermens boots), to those which consist simply ofstraps or thongs (for example, sandals).If the upper consists of two or more materials, classification is determined by theconstituent material which has the external surface area, no account being taken ofaccessories or reinforcements such as ankle patches, protective or ornamental strips oredging
Pengadilan PN CILACAP
Register : 12-06-2012 — Putus : 03-04-2013 — Upload : 27-04-2014
Putusan PN CILACAP Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2012/PN Clp
Tanggal 3 April 2013 —
322 — 171
  • scaleui 9 units of forkliftiv 2 units of generating set47v1 full unit of boiler for pelletizing machinevi 1 unit of mixervii 2 units of grinding machineviii 20 units of computerix 3 units of sedan carx 7units of Taft and Kijang carsxi Full stock of raw materials in the warehouse32 Whereas considering that Plaintiff's evidences are valid, conclusive, clearand authentic, Plaintiff requests the Honorable Panel of Judges of DistrictCourt of Cilacap for the decision to be immediately enforceable as much
    2,000MT/silo capacityii 1 set of computer scaleili 9 units of forkliftiv 2 units of generating setv1 full unit of boiler for pelletizing machinevi 1 unit of mixervii 2 units of grinding machineviii 20 units of computerix 3 units of sedan carx 7units of Taft and Kijang carsxi Full stock of raw materials in the warehouse1 To declare that conservatory sequestration upon Defendants assets isvalid and worthwhile;2 To declare that court decision on this present civil case is immediatelyenforceable as much
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 17-12-2007 — Putus : 25-03-2009 — Upload : 21-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 408 / Pdt.G / 2007/ PN.Jkt.Pst.
Tanggal 25 Maret 2009 — RICHARD BRUCE NESS
419 — 184
  • As Newmontsought to optimize gold recovery, the audit said, the device didnot work much of the time it was supposed to. The audit says thecompany also issued its workers badges designed to detectPutusan No.408/Pdt.G/2007/PN .Jkt.Pst. 24potentially dangerous levels of mercury in the air. But those didnot work either, the document says.Neither the state nor the Environmental Protection Agencyregulates mercury emissions at Nevada mines, except as waterpollutants, Professor Miler said.
    But one former Newmontemployee familiar with Indonesian mines operations said that in1998, when the mine was at the height of production and themercury scrubber was often not working, the emissions into theair could have been as much as eight tons or more.Indonesian officials said they decided to prosecute Newmontbased on the findings of a recent governmentsponsored study.
    There was just too much pressurefrom the outside. My staff told me Newmont has seven layers oflawyers, and how could I fight them?For now, the case looks likely to go ahead, In an interview,Environment Minister Rachmat Witoelar said he had the fullsupport of President Yudhoyono and the rest of the governmentto pursue the suit. Mr. Witoelar visited the bay in February,walking door to door to talk to families.
    Moran, a hydrogeologist who advises mining companiesand environmental groups, said in a telephone interview fromColorado that "clearly tailings are much more complex chemicallythan crushed rock or else they would not require detoxificationtreatment prior to disposal."The waste from the mine being released into the sea amounted to apotentially "toxic soup," he said.Mr.
    "Therewas just too much pressure from the outside. My staff told me Newmonthas seven layers of lawyers, and how could I fight them?She said she had insisted that as part of the accord of the companywould take responsibility for the health of the community. In fact, theaccord says only that the companywill monitor the public health.Putusan No.408/Pdt.G/2007/PN .Jkt.Pst. 207(xi)128.IT am disappointed they havent done anything about the publichealth, she said.
Pengadilan DILMIL I 04 PALEMBANG Pidana Militer
Register : 06-02-2020 — Putus : 12-03-2020 — Upload : 27-03-2020
Putusan DILMIL I 04 PALEMBANG Nomor 10-K/PM.I-04/AD/II/2020
Tanggal 12 Maret 2020 — Oditur:
Mukholid, S.H.,M.H
Terdakwa:
Iwan Firmansyah
76 — 31
  • Membebankan biaya perkara kepada Terdakwa sebesar Rp. 5.000,(lima ribu rupiah).Hal 29 dari 30 hal Putusan Nomor : 10K/PM 104/AD/II/2020Demikian diputuskan pada hari Kamis tanggal 12 Maret 2020 dalammusyawarah Majelis Hakim oleh Much.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 17-07-2020 — Putus : 16-09-2020 — Upload : 16-09-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 437/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 16 September 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. PASIM SENTRA UTAMA
Terbanding/Tergugat : ARES Co. LTD
123 — 66
  • pembayaran kepada Tergugat Rekonvensi atas progres yangtelah mencapai 30% dari pekerjaan Penggugat Rekonvensi selakupenerima Sub Proyek Kontrak Induk Sesko TNI TA 2016 ;Halaman 17 dari 32 halaman Putusan Nomor 437/PDT/2020/PT DKI9.10.11.12.Bahwa pada tanggal 11 Agustus 2016 tersebut, dengan mengacu padaketentuan Pasal 6 angka 6.1 Kontrak Kerjasama Simulator Wargammingtentang syaratsyarat pembayaran dalam Kontrak Kerjasama SimulatorWargamming sebagaimana dikutip sebagai berikut:6.1 First InstallmentAs much
Pengadilan PN INDRAMAYU Pidana Umum Kehutanan
Register : 27-07-2017 — Putus : 18-09-2017 — Upload : 09-10-2017
Putusan PN INDRAMAYU Nomor 227 / Pid Sus/ 2017/ PN. Idm
Tanggal 18 September 2017 — WIWIN RUHENDA alias ERWIN bin TATA SUNARYA
409 — 9
  • Saksi ELOKPAMBUDI bin ALM MUCH SUPTI, dibawah sumpahdipersidangan memberikan keterangan yang pada pokoknya sebagai berikut :e Bahwa saksi kenal dengan terdakwa karena merupakan sopir yang sehariharinya bekerja membawa atau mengemudikan truk Mitsubishi colt dieselwarna kuning No.Pol. E8039TB milik saksi;e Bahwa saksi mengetahui diperiksa dipersidangan ini sehubungan trukMitsubishi colt diesel warna kuning No.Pol.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN
Putus : 24-02-2016 — Upload : 16-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 651 K/TUN/2015
Tanggal 24 Februari 2016 — SUNARDI, DKK vs. KEPALA KANTOR WILAYAH BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONALPROPINSI JAWA TIMUR, DKK
110 — 293 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nama >: MUCH MUDZAKIR, AMD ;NIP > 19880616 201101 1 007 ;Pangkat/Gol > Pengatur (II/c) ;Jabatan : Staf Sub Seksi Perkara padaKantor Pertanahan KotaSurabaya I:Berdasarkan Surat Kuasa KhususNomor171/SKK/35.78.14/V/2014, Tanggal 08 Mei 2014;lll. PT. PATRA JASA, berkedudukan di Patra Office Tower Lt.3A Jalan Jendral Gatot Subroto Kav. 32 34 Jakarta, yangdiwakili oleh SUSILO selaku Direktur Utama PT. PatraJasa, selanjutnya memberikan kuasa kepada:TRIWEKA RINANTI, S.H., M.H.;DEVIYANI, S.H.
Pengadilan PTA SURABAYA Perdata Agama
Register : 03-01-2022 — Putus : 10-02-2022 — Upload : 10-02-2022
Putusan PTA SURABAYA Nomor 7/Pdt.G/2022/PTA.Sby
Tanggal 10 Februari 2022 — Pembanding melawan Terbanding
230 — 208
  • Soleh tidak dikaruniai anak;Saadah menikah dengan suami kedua bernama Much. Sekud alias NurYahya, telah meninggal lebih dahulu dari Saadah yaitu pada tanggal O09Oktober 2002 (P.28), Dalam perkawinan antara Saadah dengan Much.Sekud tidak dikaruniai anak;Mudrika binti H.
Pengadilan PN BOGOR Pidana Khusus
Register : 21-01-2021 — Putus : 04-05-2021 — Upload : 09-08-2021
Putusan PN BOGOR Nomor 12/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bgr
Tanggal 4 Mei 2021 — Penuntut Umum:IDA RAHAYU ARIANTI, SH Terdakwa: MULYADI Alias MUL Bin SUKARNO
67 — 26
  • ., Much. Ujang Saepudin, S.H., AsepSutisna, S.H., Advokat yang tergabung dalam Lembaga Pelayanan BantuanHalaman 1 dari 33 Putusan Nomor 12/Pid.Sus/2021/PN BgrHukum Elang Pasundan, yang beralamat di Jl.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Pidana Khusus Korupsi
Register : 19-09-2014 — Putus : 28-10-2014 — Upload : 04-08-2015
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 58/PID/TPK/2014/PT.DKI
Tanggal 28 Oktober 2014 — TEUKU BAGUS MOKHAMAD NOOR
233 — 750
  • KPK qq penampungan sebesar Rp. 10.611.000, (sepuluh jutaenam ratus sebelas ribu rupiah) dari Much Kurniawan tanggal 26April 2013. 48.BB.2107Uang tunai yang ditransfer berikut (satu) lembar fotocopy buktislip penyetoran bank BRI kepada rekening no. 0378 0100 0168 306an.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1947 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
59 — 56 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Indeed so much is that taken forgranted that it would be odd to discribe the ownerof a fee simple interest in real property as thebeneficial owner, or to say that he has thebeneficial enjoyment, or owns the beneficialestate, or is beneficial entitled to ownership; heis just the owner and that he owns it for himself itjust assumsed.bahwa menurut Cahterine Brown, istilah beneficialowner diperkenalkan untuk membedakanantara orang yang memiliki hak atau kekuasanatas harta untuk dipakai dan dinikmatinya
Pengadilan PA MADIUN Perdata Agama Harta Bersama
Register : 22-08-2011 — Putus : 12-04-2012 — Upload : 25-06-2012
Putusan PA MADIUN Nomor 233/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Mn.
Tanggal 12 April 2012 — PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT
90 — 24
  • Biaya bimbingan belajar dan kursus Much. Fauzan Rp. 3.825.000,e. Pembelian Laptop alat penunjang sekolah 2 anak Rp. 9.195.000,f. Kekurangan biaya hidup ANAK II PENGGUGAT yang seharusnya diberikansebesar Rp,1.500.000, hanya diberi Rp. 530.000, perbulan, jadi kekuranganper bulan Rp. 970.000, selama 8 bulan yaitu sejak juli 2011 (tgl perceraian) s/d bulan peb 2012 =8x Rp. 970.000, =Rp. 7.760.000,g.
Pengadilan PT SURABAYA Perdata
Register : 23-08-2024 — Putus : 12-09-2024 — Upload : 12-09-2024
Putusan PT SURABAYA Nomor 605/PDT/2024/PT SBY
Tanggal 12 September 2024 — MUCH FAHIM, S.H.,M.H
Terbanding/Penggugat : NINING SETYOWATI. A.Mpd
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II : 4. “Ketua” organisasi “Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia (PGRI)”Jawa timur
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat III : 5. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Cq. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Cq. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat IV : 6.
42 — 26
  • MUCH FAHIM, S.H.,M.H
    Terbanding/Penggugat : NINING SETYOWATI. A.Mpd
    Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II : 4. Ketua organisasi Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia (PGRI)Jawa timur
    Terbanding/Turut Tergugat III : 5. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Cq. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Cq. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi
    Terbanding/Turut Tergugat IV : 6.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 03-02-2015 — Upload : 01-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 939/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 3 Februari 2015 — PT. SORINI TOWA BERLIAN CORPORINDO vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
123 — 101 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • On the other hand,were the taxpayer is the payer of the guarantee fee, the taxpayershould be entitled to claim that payment as a taxdeductible expense,provided that the loan is used for the taxpayers business purposes.The tax authorities would fall back on the general rules and ask whatthe terms would be if an unrelated party were to have provided aguarantee and how much an unrelated party would charge. There isno data available wth regard to the above.
    sales representative, Agent shalldevote its best efforts and attention topromote the sales of Sorbitol Liquidworldwide and Sorbitol PowderProduct in overseas market Agent shallarrange to execute its function as agentat its sole cost and expenses.4.Agent shall provide Manufacturer withall appropriate information related tocustomers background, the shipmentand any other documentation.Manufacturer shall ship the SorbitolLiquid and Sorbitol Powder Productsold hereunder with such shippinginstructions as much