Ditemukan 9775 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 04-06-2012 — Putus : 15-10-2012 — Upload : 25-10-2012
Putusan PA PALEMBANG Nomor 871/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Plg.
Tanggal 15 Oktober 2012 — PEMOHON vs TERMOHON
107
  • MusiazirPanitera PenggantiTtd.Siti Aisyah, SHall Pendaftaran Rp.: ,000.2 Biaya Proses Rp.: ,000.053 Panggilan Penggugat Rp.: ,000.0214 Panggilan Tergugat Rp.: ,000.0815 Redaksi Rp.: ,000.56 Materai Rp.: ,000.6Jumlah Rp.: .000.193
Register : 19-09-2011 — Putus : 25-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.42872/PP/M.XVII/19/2013
Tanggal 25 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13024
  • The Certificate of Origin shall be issued by the relevant government authorities of theexporting party at the time of exportation or soon thereafter whenever the products to beexported can be sonsidered originating in the party within the meaning of the ASEANChinaRules of Origin;bahwa pengertian saat diekspor (at the time of exportation) menurut ketentuan kepabeanan adalahsaat barang dikeluarkan dari daerah pabean yang diukur berdasarkan tanggal pemberitahuanekspor barang, maka tanggal B/L yang menunjukkan
Putus : 13-02-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 13 /B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 13 Februari 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA
8833 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Overhead AllocationGeneral and Administrative cost, other than direct charges,allocable to this operation should be determined by a detailedstudy, and the method determined by such study shall beapplied each Year consistenly. The method selected must beapproved by PERTAMINA, and such approval can bereviewed periodically by PERTAMINA and theCONTRACTOR."
    Overhead AllocationGeneral and Administrative cost, other than direct charges,allocable to this operation should be determined by a detailedstudy, and the method determined by such study shall be appliedeach Year consistenly.
    Putusan Nomor 13/B/PK/PJK/20173.9.of the same kinds as those effected, through the permanentestablishment;Pasal 8 ayat (8):In the determination of the business profits of a permanentestablishment, there shall be allowed as deductionsexpenses which are reasonably connected with such profits,including executive and general administrative expenses,whether incurred in the Contracting State in which thepermanent establishment is situated or elsewhere.
    However,no such deduction shall be allowed in respect of amounts, ifany, paid (otherwise than towards reimbursement of actualexpenses) by the permanent establishment to the head officeof the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way ofroyalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the useof patents or other rights, or by way of commission forspecific services performed or for management, or by way ofinterest on moneys lent to the permanent establishment.Likewise, no account shall be
    Singapura berkaitan dengan pengurusanboard dan lodging karyawan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali(semula Pemohon Banding) di Singapura, pengurusanground handling pesawat di Singapura merupakanpenghasilan bagi pihak luar negeri yaitu Chevron OverseasServices Limited sehingga harus dipotong PPh Pasal 26;3.13.Bahwaterkait Overhead Allocation General andAdministrative cost, other than direct charges, allocable tothis operation should be determined by a detailed study, andthe method determined by such study shall
Register : 22-07-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42598/PP/M.M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
15445
  • Berdasarkan ATTACHMENT A: OPERATIONAL CERTIFICATIONPROCEDURES FOR THE RULES OF ORIGIN OF THE ASEANCHINA FREETRADE AREA pada Rule 6 butir (a) dinyatakan "The Government authoritiesdesignated to issue the Certificate of Origin shall, to the best of their competenceand ability, carry out proper examination upon each application for the Certificateof Origin to ensure that:a. The application and the Certificate of Origin are duly completed and signedby the authorised signatory;b.
Putus : 05-01-2010 — Upload : 02-05-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 857 K/PDT.SUS/2009
Tanggal 5 Januari 2010 — Mr. CHRIS Y. CHUI ; PT. WIRA INSANI
6864 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Representative hereby accepts such appointment andaggress that in sale of the Products it shall alt all times carry out actionsthat, promote and maintain the excellence and quality of, and to preservegoodwill which is now associated with, the name and reputation ofWeatherford ...Terjemahan :1.1 Hakhak Khusus/Eksklusif.
    If the Company terminates yourassignment with immediate release, you shall take during the notice periodany vacation leave, which you are entitled. The notice period and anyvacation leave shall run concurrently. My notice is required if you areterminated by Company for violation of Companys policies and procedure.(vide Bukti T5)Terjemahan :13.
Register : 17-04-2017 — Putus : 23-05-2017 — Upload : 18-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 825 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 23 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. MEIWA KOGYO INDONESIA;
6570 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ,Ltd (MJAP)shall assist and render to PT Meiwa Kogyo Indonesia (M/ND) the followingservice;1. To assist the Production knowhow of the Buffing and the other Productswith proper technology,Halaman 2 dari 26 halaman. Putusan Nomor 825/B/PK/PJK/20172. To assist the other matters which MIND desires, concern thatPRODUCTS,Bahwa informasi yang disampaikan berkenaan dengan /ayout pabrik (settingline produksi, pengaturan/penempatan mesin/peralatan) dan teknik prosesproduksi M/ND.
    Meiwa Nomor 001.2005 Article J Service diketahui:1) Meiwa Industry Co.Ltd shall assist and render to PT MeiwaKogyo Indonesia the following service production know how ofthe buffing and the others products with proper technology andto assist the other matters which PT Meiwa Kogyo Indonesiadesires, concern that products;2) PT Meiwa Kogyo Indonesia (Termohon Peninjauan Kembali(semula Pemohon Banding)) shall pay to Meiwa Industry Co.Ltd as a royalty for the technical assisteance and know how tobe rendered
Register : 23-08-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42599/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
9950
  • signifikan antara tandatangan yang tertera pada Form E dengan specimen yang berwenang, sehinggakeabsahan dokumen Form E diragukan dan atas importasi PIB Nomor 189954tanggal 25/05/2011 ditetapkan berdasarkan tarif yang berlaku umum;bahwa penelitian terhadap uraian masalah dan dokumen pelengkap adalahsebagai berikut:a) Berdasarkan Rule 6 Attachment A Operational Certification Procedure (OCP)Anex 3 attachment A ditegaskan bahwa"Rule 6The Government authorities designated to issue the Certificate of Origin shall
Register : 17-07-2013 — Putus : 19-10-2013 — Upload : 19-01-2015
Putusan PA JENNEPONTO Nomor 114/Pdt.G/2013/PA Jnp.
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2013 — MULIATI binti PALETTERI LAWAN MUH. IDRUS KAHAR, S.H. bin ABD. KAHAR
5647
  • par pard ltrparqj11993ri0s1360slmult1lwidctlparwrapdefaultaspalphaaspnumfaautoadjustrightrin0O1in993itapOpararsid3678620 rtlchfcsl afl ltrchfcs0f1lang1057langfel1033langnp1057insrsid334181charrsid3678620 '93Any dispute, controversy or claims arising between the Parties out of orin relation to this Agreement, or breach hereof, including without limitation any question relative to its interpretation,performance, validity, effectiveness and the termination of the rights orobligations of any Party, shall
    If such dispute cannot be resolved amicably by the parties then such dispute shall be settledexclusively and finally by arbitration.
    par pard ltrparqj11993ri0s1360slmult1widctlparwrapdefaultaspalphaaspnumfaautoadjustright rin0O1in993itapOpararsid3678620 rtlchfcsl afl ltrchfcs0f1lang1057langfel1033langnp1057insrsid334181charrsid3678620 '93Any dispute, controversy or claims arising between the Parties out of orin relation to this Agreement, or breach hereof, including without limitation any question relative to itsinterpretation, performance, validity, effectiveness and the terminationof the rights or obligations of any Party, shall
    If such dispute cannot be resolved amicably by the parties then such dispute shall besettled exclusively and finally by arbitration.
    The Arbitration shalltake place in Singapore in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of theSingapore International Arbitration Centre ('93STAC Rules'94) for the time being in force which rules aredeemed to be incorporated by reference to this clause, in which case thelanguage of the arbitration shall be in English, or in Jakarta, in thePurchaserrquotes sole discretion, before 3 (three) arbitrators in accordance with theRules (the '93Rules'94) of BANI (Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia).par pard
Register : 17-12-2018 — Putus : 17-01-2019 — Upload : 17-01-2019
Putusan PA JEMBER Nomor 6652/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Jr
Tanggal 17 Januari 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
160
  • perbuatan tercela, namun begitu dalam keadaan suami isteri sudahtidak saling mencintai lagi dan yang terjadi hanya sikap permusuhan dan salingmembenci sebagaimana yang dialami oleh Penggugat dan Tergugat tersebut,maka perceraian dibolehkan, sesuai dengan doktrin hukum Islam yang tercantumdalam Kitab Figih Sunnah Juz II halaman 248 :Mee E95) Slyadal cae al) all all Gye Gul Gy) Ag Gl Qi dle BLY) Gados ly Ugala) oh Ugaes ol Uda sae: Sie Lagltia) Gar ytiall alga dime gUbiow Y yl ualSAS 13 ell gi Soll Cpa Shall
Register : 22-04-2016 — Putus : 26-04-2016 — Upload : 07-11-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 49/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 26 April 2016 — Nama : HANDY GUNAWAN Pekerjaan : Wiraswasta Alamat : Jl. Pluit Selatan VI No. 03 Rt. 014/Rw.06 Kel. Pluit, Kec. Penjaringan, Jakarta Utara Untuk selanjutnya disebut sebagai PEMOHON I Nama : N A T A L I A Pekerjaan : Wiraswasta Alamat : Jl. Pluit Selatan VI No. 03 Rt. 014/Rw.06 Kel. Pluit, Kec. Penjaringan, Jakarta Utara Untuk selanjutnya disebut sebagai PEMOHON II; Selanjutnya Pemohon I dan Pemohon II disebut sebagai Para Pemohon ;
282367
  • Noone shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No oneshall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and inaccordance with such procedure as are established by law.2. Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest,of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed ofany charges against him.3.
    Anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall bebrought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized bylaw to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trialwithin a reasonable time or to release. It shall not be thegeneral rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained incustody, but release may be subject to guarantees to appearfor trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and,should occasion arise, for execution of the judgement.4.
    Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest ordetention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a court,in order that that court may decide without delay on thelawulness of his detention and order his release if thedetention is not lawul.5.
Putus : 27-05-2009 — Upload : 22-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1664 K/PID/2008
Tanggal 27 Mei 2009 — Ir. H. ENDRO PRAPONCO, MM., VS PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA Cq. Jaksa Agung Cq. Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi Jakarta Cq. Aspidus Kejati DKI Jakarta Cq. Tim Penyidik di Kejati DKI Jakarta
4432 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No one shall bedeprived qf his liberty except on such gourds and in accordancewith such procedure as are established by law" Bahwa prinsip ini juga ditegaskan dalam UU No.39 tahun 1999tentang Hak Azasi Manusia sehingga dengan demikian, penahananyang dilakukan oleh Termohon terhadap diri Pemohon selain tidakberdasarkan hukum, juga bertentangan dengan normanorma yangtelah diterima secara universal ; Bahwa dengan demikian adalah sudah selayaknya danberdasarkan hukum serta sangat berperikemanusiaan apabilaPengadilan
    No one shall be subjected toarbitrary or detention.
    No one shall be deprived of his liberty except onsuch gourds and in accordance 'With such procedure as are establishedby law", yang ditegaskan dalam UU No.39 tahun 1999 tentang Hak AzasiManusia.Sehubungan dengan halhal tersebut, Pemohon memohon Majelis Hakimuntuk:1.BrMengabulkan permohonan Praperadilan untuk seluruhnya.Menyatakan penahanan berdasarkan Surat Perintah Penahanan No.Print 755/O.1.5/Fd.1/05/2008 tgl 27 Mei 2008 serta Penahanan Lanjutanberdasarkan Surat Perpanjangan Penahanan No.
    Noone shall be subjected to arbitrary or detention.
Register : 23-11-2015 — Putus : 15-12-2015 — Upload : 10-06-2016
Putusan PTA SURABAYA Nomor 0361/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Sby
Tanggal 15 Desember 2015 — Pembanding vs Terbanding
2899
  • Musthafa AsSibaisebagai pendapatnya sendiri sebagaimana tersebut dalam kitabnya AlMaratu baina alFighi wa alQanun halaman 100, dalam teks Arabnyaberbunyi sebagai berikut:aS gly SY VI dno al ye Gyo Alla G8 Lilac el Gill 5 GLEAN ae aid Y dan jl) Shall Glscei GI 2S Ge GLb Leal gt OLS Ibs & I jill Ihe lal GS Lagey GQuechie Gn gleial 4 ATsAusLeLl 4x0 ay dill A) Sh Legis ly JS Coe al del Gens) Ge Ge diag jl ENIY 5Artinya : "Bahwa kehidupan suamiisten itu tidak akan memperolehketenangan ditengah perpecahan
Register : 17-02-2011 — Putus : 12-04-2011 — Upload : 26-05-2012
Putusan PA JEMBER Nomor 731/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Jr
Tanggal 12 April 2011 — PENGGUGAT DAN TERGUGAT
110
  • lySigil) Cua Shall pte UALS! gl GUY lll cL else et oly ilyCUS 9 C95 Cale! gh Ang HN Atk cli) Goal Lal ges Gah ILE ed giLegis CIA CS gall) Jae g Uglied cys Badal! alga Ame GUN Lea sly!
Putus : 01-08-2013 — Upload : 18-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 96 B/PK/PJK/2012
Tanggal 1 Agustus 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK vs. PT. KENCANA INTERNUSA ARTHA FINANCE d/h PT. PRIMUS FINANCIAL SERVICES
4326 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, such royalties may also be taxed in the ContractingState in which they arise, and according to the laws of thatState, but if the recipient is the beneficial omer of the royaltiesthe tax so charged shall not exceed 15 percent of the grossHalaman 13 dari 26 halaman. Putusan Nomor 96/B/PK/PJK/2012amount of the royalties. The competent authorities of theContracting States shall by mutual agreement settle the mode ofapplication of this limitation;4.
    Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in whichthey arise, and according to the law of that State, but the tax socharged shall not exceed:(a) in the case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3(b) and(c), and to the extent to which they relate to those royalties,in subparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%;3.
Putus : 21-05-2012 — Upload : 22-03-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 480/B/PK/Pjk/2011
Tanggal 21 Mei 2012 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. SUPRA PRIMATAMA NUSANTARA
5839 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ayat 3 Perjanjian Penghindaran PajakBerganda antara Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dengan Pemerintah Jepangmenyebutkan sebagai berikut :1 Royalties arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other theContracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State.2 However, such royalties may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which theyarise, and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the recipient is thebeneficial owner of the royalties the tax so charged shall
    Ayat 1, Ayat 2, Ayat 3 dan Ayat 4 Perjanjian Penghindaran PajakBerganda antara Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dengan Pemerintah Singapuramenyebutkan sebagai berikut :1 Royalties arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the otherContracting State may be taxed in that other State.2 However, such royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise,and according to the law of that State, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of theroyalties, the tax so charged shall
    not exceed 15% of the gross amount of the royalties.3 The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall by mutual agreementsettle the mode of application of this limitation.4 The term "royalties" as used in this Article means payments of any kind received asa consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic orscientific work including cinematograph films and films or tapes for radio or televisionbroadcasting, any patent, trademark, design or model, plan
    Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Barang dan Jasa dan Pajak Penjualan atasBarang Mewah sebagaimana telah diubah dengan UndangUndang Nomor 18Tahun 2000 menyebutkan sebagai berikut :1 Royalties derived from sources within one of the Contracting States by a residentof other Contracting State may be taxed by both Contracting States.2 The rate of tax imposed by a Contracting State on royalties derived from sourceswithin that Contracting State and beneficially owned by a resident of the other ContractingState shall
Register : 08-02-2017 — Putus : 12-04-2017 — Upload : 25-04-2017
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 78/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 12 April 2017 — PT.JABATEX >< MAYER & CIE GMBH & CO KG (DAHULU BERNAMA MAYER & CIE GMBH & CO)
156103
  • Penggugat dan Tergugat saat iniadalah hubungan hukum berdasarkan Perjanjian Utang Piutang;Melalui gugatannya dalam perkara ini, Penggugat meminta PengadilanNegeri Jakarta Pusat untuk antara lain menyatakan batal PerjanjianUtang Piutang (vide petitum gugatan no. 4 dan 6);Pasal 13.2 Perjanjian Utang Piutang menyatakan sebagai berikutFailing such an amicable setllement any dispute arising out of or inconnection wih this Agreement, including any question regarding itsexistence, validity or termination, shall
    The tribunal shall consist of one arbitrator to be appointed by theChairman of BANI.
    The language of the arbitration shall be in English;Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia adalah sebagai berikut:Apabila penyelesaian secara damai tidak tercapai, seliao permasalahanyang timbul dari atau berkaitan dengan Perjanjian ini, termasuk setappertanyaan mengenai keberadaan, keabsahan atau pengakhirannya,harus ditujukan kepada dan diselesaikan melalui arbitrase di Jakartasesuai dengan PeraturanPeraturan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia("PeraturanPeraturan BANI") yang berlaku pada saat ini, aturan
    Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 794 K/Sip/1982 tanggal 27 Januari1983, yang pada pokoknya menyatakan :"Memperhatikan Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978(surat bukti P.1) di bawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikanbahwa all differences arising out of this Policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in witing by the parties indifference or if they cannot agree upon a single arbitrator;Menimbang, bahwa dengan demikian Pengadilan Negeri tidakberwenang untuk memeriksa
Putus : 30-06-2014 — Upload : 17-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 220/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 30 Juni 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
5440 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which itarises and according to the laws of that State, but if the BeneficialOwner of the interest is a resident of the other State, the tax socharged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of theinterest.Halaman 18 dari 40 halaman. Putusan Nomor 220 /B/PK/PJK/20143.
    Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in oneof the two States shall be taxable only in the other State to the extentthat such interest is derived by:(i) the Government of the other State, including political subdivisionsand local authorities thereof; or(ii) the Central Bank of the other State; or(iii) a financial institution owned or controlled by the Government ofthe other State, including political subdivisions and localauthorities thereof; or(iv) any resident of the other
    Notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 2, interest arising in oneof the other Stares shall be taxable only in the other State if theBeneficial Owner of the interest is a resident of the other State and ifthe interest is paid on a loan made for a period of more than 2 yearsor is paid in connection with the sale on credit of any industrial,commercial or scientific equipment.5.
    The competent authorities of the two States shall by mutualagreement settle the mode of application of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.Bahwa Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali (Semula Terbanding) melakukankoreksi positif Dasar Pengenaan Pajak (DPP) Pajak Penghasilan Pasal26 berupa bunga pinjaman sebesar Rp19.620.300.000,00 karena padasaat pemeriksaan diketahui berdasarkan hasil pertukaran informasidengan pihak otoritas Belanda, dapat disimpulkan pihak Dupoer Finance,B.V. adalah bukan Beneficial Owner (BO) atau pemilik
    Commentary on Article 11 Paragraph 17any provision of this Convention conferring an exemptionfrom, or a reduction of tax shall not apply if more than 50 percent of such income is used to satisfy claims by such persons(including interest, royalties, development, advertising, initialand travel expenses, and depreciation of any kind of businessassets including those on immaterial goods and processes) ,Dalam buku berjudul "Beneficial Ownership of Royalties in BilateralTax Treaties" yang ditulis oleh
Register : 05-12-2013 — Putus : 19-03-2014 — Upload : 27-11-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 904 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 19 Maret 2014 — PT. INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT, TBK VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
9045 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Thereby upon the execution of this AddenduIl, the Agreement becomes terminated and all the termand conditions of the Agreement shall becomunenforceable, null and void.2.
    Thereby upon the execution of this Addendum II,the Agreement becomes terminated and all the terms and conditions of theAgreement shall become unenforceable, null and void,Terjemahan tersumpahnya oleh Penterjemah Tersumpah Eko Tjahyadiadalah sebagai berikut:Dengan mengesampingkan dan melepaskan hakhak pemulihan, tindakanhukum, dan ganti kerugian yang dapat dimiliki oleh Pemberi Sewaberdasarkan Perjanjian, Para Pihak dengan ini sepakat untuk mengakhinPerjanjian.
Putus : 24-02-2004 — Upload : 23-08-2007
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 032K/N/HAKI/2003
Tanggal 24 Februari 2004 — Pioneer Kabushiki Kaisha; Century Batteries Indonesia Ltd; Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Cq. Departemen Kehakiman dan Ham Cq Direktorat Jenderal Hak Cipta, Paten Dan Merek (Direktorat Merek)
747698 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • merupakan merek terkenal baik dinegaranya sendiri Jepangmaupun dipelbagai negara di dunia termasuk di Indonesia.Berdasarkan Pasal 4 UndangUndang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentangMerek, merek Temohon kasasi termasuk dalam pengertian/dikualifikasisebagai pendaftar yang bentikad tidak baik, sehingga berdasarkan pasal69 ayat (2) UndangUndang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 dapat dibatalkantanpa batas waiktu.Ketentuanketentuan diatas sejalan dengan pasal 6 bis ayat (3) KonvensiParis yang menyatakan bahwa NO TIME LIMIT SHALL
Register : 11-03-2015 — Putus : 09-04-2015 — Upload : 15-12-2015
Putusan PTA SURABAYA Nomor 0119/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Sby
Tanggal 9 April 2015 — PENGGUGAT (Terbanding) DAN TERGUGAT (Pembanding)
2110
  • Musthafa AsSibai yang selanjutnya diambil alihsebagai pendapatnya sendiri sebagai mana tersebut dalam kitabnya AlMaratubaina alFighi wa alQanun halaman 100, berbunyi sebagai berikut :OY VI Aga ys atl: 5) pete Gyo MNS GA Lola eI Gilly GURY ae aiid Y Aaa g 5) shall oldLgdlud 6) GIS pbsd 1 jill laa lal GS) Lage sy Qyetltie Quy Eleial SY 5 agS shu sSy pth Logie ant y USI cee al Sel Ge 9 Sl Gye Ga Aang NAB all Seth Oo) pl Ge Goldoh pets Atle!