Ditemukan 9774 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 24-07-2019 — Putus : 24-07-2019 — Upload : 26-07-2019
Putusan PN MALANG Nomor 156/Pid.C/2019/PN Mlg
Tanggal 24 Juli 2019 — Penyidik Atas Kuasa PU:
HERI MULYONO, S. AP
Terdakwa:
ali muntardo
202
  • 4..Petugas yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, nama Mugn) Set YOWAT , cHnip .'97007.20 200701 2 ol2cp shall vel et ree Se... dengan mengingat sumpah jabatan serta berdasarkan peraturan Daerah Kota MalangNomor 5 Tahun 2009 tentang Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipi menyatakan bahwa pada hari ini, MN csc onetanggal 20 !9....... pukul...
Register : 19-12-2014 — Putus : 24-08-2015 — Upload : 09-09-2015
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 914/Pdt.G/2014/PN Dps.
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2015 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI MELAWAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT & LEISURE (PT. BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY);
17194
  • The arbitration panel shall consist of there (3)Hal. 5 dari 66 halaman putusan perkara Nomor 914/Pdt.G/2014/PN Dps.13.14.arbitrators, one (1) closed by the complainant, one (1) chosen by the respondentand a chairman chosen by the arbitrators named by the complainant and therespondent dalam terjemahan bebasnya berarti: Perselisihan antara para pihakyang muncul dan perjanjian ini atau dari perjanjian lain yang terkait denganperjanjian ini yang tidak dapat diselesaikan oleh Presiden Direktur yangmenyewakan
    The arbitrationpanel shall consist of three (3) arbitrators, one (1) chosen by thecomplainant, one (1) chosen by the respondent and a chairman chosen bythe arbitrators named by the complainant and the respondent;The Parties expressly agree that :(a) the arbitration tribunal shall decide the matter as expeditiously aspossible, and the arbitration shall be complete and the decisionissued by the arbitrators no later than twelve (12) months after thedate of commencement of the arbitration proceedings
    (being thedate of service of the complaint by the party initiating thearbitration), unless the arbitration panel finds good cause to permitan extension of the time for completion;(b) the arbitrators shall only reach their decision by applying strict rulesof law to the facts and shall not purport to resolve any dispute exaequo et bono;(c) the arbitration shall be conducted in the English language;(d) any decision of the arbitration tribunal shall be final, binding andincontestable and no Party shall
    dispute or question the decision ofthe arbitration tribunal before any judicial authority in the Republicof Indonesia or elsewhere;(e) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.Hal. 15 dari 66 halaman putusan perkara Nomor 914/Pdt.G/2014/PN Dps.16The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity;
    14.3 Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until the arbitrationtribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, except in the event ofexpiration, termination or failure by any of the other Parties to obey orcomply with a specific order or decision of the arbitration tribunal,continue to perform all of its obligations under this Agreement withoutprejudice to a final adjustment in accordance with the said award;Terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesia :Pasal 14 ARBITRASI;14.114.2Perselisihan
Putus : 11-12-2019 — Upload : 23-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4137/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 11 Desember 2019 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
4724 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 4137/B/PK/Pjk/2019(C) The term outer sole as used in headings 64,01 to 64,05 means that part of the footwear(other than an attached heel) which, when in use, is in contact with the ground, Theconstituent material of the outer sole for purposes of classification shall be taken to be thematerial having the greatest surface area in contact with the ground.
    In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
    Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter :a The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestexternal surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, cdging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestsurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch
    Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter (ay The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestexternal surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestsurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch
Register : 08-02-2017 — Putus : 20-04-2017 — Upload : 27-04-2017
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 75/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 20 April 2017 — PT.MULTILINE SHIPPING COMPANY (YML DIV) >< TN.BUDI HARTO CS
194119
  • PorttoPort ShipmentWhen loss or damage has occurred between the time ofloading the Goods by the Carrier, or any Underlying Carrier, atthe port of loading the time of discharge by the Carrier, at theport of discharge, the responsibility of the Carrier shall bedetermined in accordance with Hague Rules or any nationallawmaking the Hague Rules, or any amendments theretoincluding the HaqueVisbv Amandements, compulsorilyapplicable to this Bill. ...etc.Yang terjemahan Resminya sebagai berikut :Hal 11 dari
    JURISDICTIONExpect as otherwise provided specifically herein any claim ordispute arising under this Bill shall be governed by the low ofEngland and determined in the English courts of any other place.In the event this clause is inapplicable under local law thenjurisdiction and choice of law shall lie in either the port of loadingor port of discharge at carrier's option."Yang terjemahan Resminya sebagai berikut : "26.
    Any mention in this Bill of parties to be notified of theGoods is solely for information of the Carrier, and failure togive such notification shall not involve the Carrieranyliability or relieve the Merchant of any obligationshereunder.Yang terfemahan Resminya sebagaiberikut : 18. PEMBERITAHUAN DANPENGIRIMAN(1).
    The Carrier shall beunder no liability whatsover for loss off or damage to, theGoods, however occurring, if such loss or damage arisesprior to loading on to, or subsequent to the discharge from,the Vessel.
    Notwithstanding the foregoing in the event thatany applicable compulsory law provides to the contrary, theCarrier shall have the benefit of every right, defense,limitation and liberty set forth in the Hague Rules as appliedby this Clause during such additional compulsory period ofresponsibility... etc.Yang terjemahan Resminya sebagai berikut :7. TANGGUNG JAWAB CARRIER DAN PASALPASALTERTINGGI(1).
Putus : 27-08-2015 — Upload : 15-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1150 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 27 Agustus 2015 — Tuan ISMERDA LEBANG, dk VS PT HUMPUS INTERMODA TRANSPORTASI, Tbk.
604448 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • 29 Maret 2008, Bagian 11 :"This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance withEnglish Law and any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contractshall be referred to arbitration in London.."
    Bahwa salah satu klausula dalam Letter of Undertaking tertanggal 17 Juni2008 menyatakan bahwa perjanjian yang dimaksud tunduk pada hukumNegara Inggris, sesuai dengan yang dinyatakan sebagai berikut:"This letter shall be governed and construed in accordance with EnglishLaw';4.
    Salah satu klausula Letter of Undertaking (LoU) tertanggal 17 Juni2008 menyatakan bahwa perjanjian yang dimaksud tunduk padahukum Negara Inggris, sesuai dengan yang dinyatakan sebagaiberikut;This letter shall be governed and construed in accordance withEnglish Law. (Vide Bukti T.IV1 dan T.IV2);Yang apabila diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia memilikimakna sebagai berikut:Surat ini akan diatur dan ditafsirkan sesuai dengan hukum Inggrisc.
    secara resmitersumpah dalam bahasa Indonesia, telah dinyatakan bahwaThis contract Shall ...........:6:0000 and any dispute arising outof or in connection with this contract shall be referred toarbitration in London ............++ , yang mempunyai maknabahwa Perjanjian ini ..............
    Pasal XI dari SBBC menyatakan sebagaiberikut:This Agreement shall be construed and the relations betweenthe parties determined in accordance with the laws of EnglandHal 55 dari 73 hal. Put. Nomor 1150 K/PDT/20153.7.and any dispute arising out of this agreement shall be referred toarbitration in London.
Register : 22-03-2011 — Putus : 13-12-2011 — Upload : 28-04-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 173/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 13 Desember 2011 — PT. LEBONG TANDAI ( PT. LT ), L A W A N AVOCET MINING PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
17494
  • terhadapnyaditawarkan terlebin dahulu saham apabila pemegangsaham/pemilik hendak menjual sahamnya.Bahwa ketentuan tentang First Right of Refusal tersebutdiatur dalam Pasal 8.1.3 Amendment No. 1 To Contract ofWork Joint Venture Agreement sebagaimana dikutip dibawah ini:Hal 13 dari 37 Hal Putusan No. 180/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel14Pasal 8.1.3 Amendment No. 1 To Contract of WorkJoint Venture Agreement tertanggal 27 Pebruari 2004:Before either Party (the Assigning Party) exercisesits right to assign, the Assigning Party shall
    January 2002 (vide buktiT2) dan kemudian diubah dengan Amendment No. 1 ToContract of Work Joint Venture Agreement tertanggal 27Februari 2004 (vide bukti T3).Bahwa di dalam Pasal 9.7 dari New Contract of WorkPerjanjian Joint Venture menunjuk kepada arbitrase dikutipsebagai berikut:Hal 15 dari 37 Hal Putusan No. 180/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel16Pasal 9.7 New Contract of Work Perjanjian JointVenture tertanggal 30 Juni 1994: saavan that all disputes hereunder or concerning any ofthe subject matter hereof shall
    be finally settled underthe Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration of theInternational Chamber of Commerce by threearbitrators appointed in accordance with the Rules allof whom shall have internationally recognizedqualifications for such appointment together with asubstantial background of business experience.Judgement on the award of a majority of the arbitratorsmay be entered in any court having jurisdiction.Nomination of the Arbitrators shall be accomplished asprovided under the Rules.
    Joint Venture yaitu dalamNovation and Amendment Agreement tertanggal 31 Januari2002 (vide Bukti T2) dalam Pasal 6.4 diatur bahwaketentuan tentang arbitrase di Perjanjian Joint Venture awal(yaitu pasal 9.7 New Contract of Work Perjanjian JointVenture) tetap berlaku terhadap Novation and AmendmentAgreement 31 Januari 2002, sebagaimana dikutip sebagaiberikut :Pasal 6.4 Perjanjian Novasi dan Perubahannyatertanggal 31 January 2002 (vide Bukti T2):Any dispute arising hereunder that directly involvesPT LT shall
    membatalkanputusanjudexfactiedanmenyatakan bahwaPengadilan Negeritidak berkuasa menqadili perkara itu.Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 794K/Sip/1982, tanggal 27 Januari 1983 (Bukti T10), menyatakansebagai berikut:Terlepas dari alasankasasi, putusanPengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan denganalasan Mahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkan hukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus1978 di bawah bagian tentang Conditions telahdiuraikan bahwa all differences arising out of thisPolicy shall
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-50160/PP/M.VIII/16/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12233
  • abstrak sehingga tidak mudah diidentifikasi;bahwa sebagai upaya untuk mengetahui bagaimana seharusnya memaknai "penyerahanjasa" sebagaimana tertera pada Pasal 4 huruf c UndangUndang PPN, mengingat belumditemukannya penjelasan yang jelas terkait hal tersebut pada penjelasan undangundang,dapat Terbanding uraikan sebagai berikut :bahwa berdasarkan article tiga puluh satu EU VAT Directive tentang Place of Supply ofGoods dinyatakan bahwa where goods are use dispatched or transported, the place ofsupply shall
    be deemed to be the place where the goods are located at the time when thesupply takes place;bahwa berdasarkan article empat puluh tiga EU VAT Directive tentang General RulesPlace of Supply of Service dinyatakan bahwa the place of supply of service shall bedeemed to be the place where the supplier has established his business or has a fixedestablishment from which the service is supplied, or, in the absence of such a place ofbusiness or fixed establishment, the place where he has his permanent address
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-50165/PP/M.VIII/16/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12827
  • abstrak sehingga tidak mudah diidentifikasi;bahwa sebagai upaya untuk mengetahui bagaimana seharusnya memaknai "penyerahanjasa" sebagaimana tertera pada Pasal 4 huruf c UndangUndang PPN, mengingat belumditemukannya penjelasan yang jelas terkait hal tersebut pada penjelasan undangundang,dapat Terbanding uraikan sebagai berikut :bahwa berdasarkan article tiga puluh satu EU VAT Directive tentang Place of Supply ofGoods dinyatakan bahwa where goods are use dispatched or transported, the place ofsupply shall
    be deemed to be the place where the goods are located at the time when thesupply takes place;bahwa berdasarkan article empat puluh tiga EU VAT Directive tentang General RulesPlace of Supply of Service dinyatakan bahwa the place of supply of service shall bedeemed to be the place where the supplier has established his business or has a fixedestablishment from which the service is supplied, or, in the absence of such a place ofbusiness or fixed establishment, the place where he has his permanent address
Register : 24-01-2012 — Putus : 21-11-2012 — Upload : 19-03-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2012 — PT PETROBAS >< PT. COSMIC INDONESIA.Cs
334130
  • Inno event shall failures of performance of the SELLER'S suppliers, shippers, brokers orcommercial agents shall constitute FORCE MAJEURE unless such failure is the result of aFORCE MAJEURE event affecting the supplier, shipper, broker or commercial agent asdefined in the relevant agreement. Further, in no event shall the SELLER'S economichardship constitute FORCE MAJEURE.
    Such arbitration shall be conducted in theINDONESIAN language.
    Any arbitration award shall be final and bindingupon both parties.Terjemahan terhadap pasal tersebut adalah sebagai berikut:Sengketa/perbedaan yang ada diantara para pihak yang timbul karenakelalaian atau berhubungan dengan perjanjian ini, atau sebagai akibatdari perbedaan penafsiran makna, efek atau kinerja daripada itu, yangtidak dapat diselesaikan dengan kesepakatan bersama, akandiselesaikanmelaluiArbitrase di BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONALINDONESIA (BANI) JAKARTA. INDONESIA.
    In no event shall failures ofperformance of the SELLER'S suppliers, shippers, brokers or commercial agentsshall constitute FORCE MAJEURE unless such failure is the result of a FORCEMAJEURE event affecting the supplier, shipper, broker or commercial agent asdefined in the relevant agreement. Further, in no event shall the SELLER'Seconomic hardship constitute FORCE MAJEURE..
    41/Pdt.G/2012/PN .Jkt.Pstof performance of the SELLERS suppliers, shippers, brokers orcommercial agents shall constitute FORCE MAJEURE unless such failureis the result of a FORCE MAJEURE event affecting the supplier, shipper,broker or commercial agent as defined in the relevant agreement Futher,in no event shall the SELLERS economic hardship constitute FORCEMAJEURE.Bahwa, dari Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebasmenyebutkan:Keadaan kahar (bahasa Perancis: force majeure yang berarti"kekuatan
Register : 17-07-2023 — Putus : 04-09-2023 — Upload : 07-11-2023
Putusan PN BEKASI Nomor 280/Pid.B/2023/PN Bks
Tanggal 4 September 2023 — Penuntut Umum:
NI MADE WARDANI,SH
Terdakwa:
YOGI ADRIANTO Als. YOGI
220
  • 1 (satu) buah Shall warna hitam.

Dikembalikan kepada saksi korban Ari Saputra;

6. Membebankan kepada Terdakwa tersebut membayar biaya perkara masing masing sejumlah Rp. 5.000,- (Lima ribu rupiah);

Putus : 30-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 556/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 30 Juni 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE INDONESIA
5030 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply if thebeneficial owner of the royalties or fees for technical services,being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on business inthe other Contracting State in which the royalties or fees fortechnical services arise through a permanent establishmentsituated therein, or performs in that other State independentpersonal services from a fixed base situated therein, and theright, property or contract in respect of which the royalties orfees
    Royalties and fees for technical services shall be deemed toarise in a Contracting State when the payer is that State itself, aLand, a political subdivision, a local authority or a resident ofthat State.
    Where, however, the person paying the royalties orfees for technical services, whether he is a resident of aContracting State or not, has in a Contracting State a permanentestablishment or fixed base in connection with which theobligation to make the payments was incurred, and thepayments are borne by that permanent establishment or fixedbase, then the royalties or fees for technical services shall bedeemed to arise in the Contracting State in which the permanentestablishment or fixed base is situated
    Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payerand the beneficial owner or between both of them and someother person, the amount of the royalties or fees for technicalservices paid exceeds, for whatever reason, the amount whichwould have been agreed upon by the payer and the beneficialowner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of thisArticle shall apply only to the lastmentioned amount.
    In suchcase, the excess part of the payments shall remain taxableaccording to the laws of each Contracting State, due regardbeing had to the other provisions of this Agreement.7.
Putus : 26-07-2016 — Upload : 14-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1005 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 26 Juli 2016 — JUNANDA PUTJE SYARFUAN, dk VS PT HUMPUSS INTERMODA TRANSPORTASI TBK
1215866 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ltd (the "Charterers") ofeach and every obligation of the Charterers of whatsoever nature underor in connection with the above referenced charterpatty (the"Charterparty") and should any breach thereof occur, we herebyundertake to indemnify you immediately upon demand without deductionfor all losses, expenses and liabilities of whatsoever nature that you maysuffer or incur by reason of that breach;Our liability under this guarantee shall be as primary obligor and in noway conditional upon your first
    proceeding against the Charterers.Further, our obligation hereunder is unlimited and shall not be affected byany insolvency (including without limitation, winding up, administration,receivership or administrative receivership), amalgamation,reconstruction, change of name, ownership, control or status of, or anyHalaman 3 dari 25 hal.
    Nomor 1005 K/Pdt/2016legal limitation relating to, by or of the Charterers or any other person,and we shall not be discharged or released from our obligationshereunder by any arrangement or agreement made between you and theCharterers or a receiver, administrative receiver, administrator, liquidator,or similar officer of the Charterers, or by renegotiation, substitution,alteration, amendment or variation (however fundamental) of theobligations imposed upon the Charterers under or in connection with
    proceeding against the Charterers.Further, our obligation hereunder is unlimited and shall not be affectedby any insolvency (including without limitation, winding up,administration, receivership or administrative receivership),amalgamation, reconstruction, change of name, ownership, control orHalaman 13 dari 25 hal.
    Nomor 1005 K/Pdt/2016status of, or any legal limitation relating to, by or of the Charterers or anyother person, and we shall not be discharged or released from ourobligations hereunder by any arrangement or agreement made betweenyou and the Charterers or a receiver, administrative receiver,administrator, liquidator, or similar officer of the Charterers, or byrenegotiation, substitution, alteration, amendment or variation (howeverfundamental) of the obligations imposed upon the Charterers under or
Putus : 03-08-2016 — Upload : 16-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 179 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 3 Agustus 2016 — PT LEBONG TANDAI (PT LT), VS PT J. RESOURCES BOLAANG MONGONDOW, DKK
186155 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • New Contract ofWork 1994 juncto Amendemen Nomor 1 2004, yang mengatur sebagaiberikut:Before either Party (the Assigning Party exercise its right to assign, theAssigning Party shall offer in writing such assignment to the other party,such offer to be valid for a period of 45 days following the other Partysreceipt of the offer;Terjemahan tersumpah Pasal 8.1.3.
    This Agreement shall be constructed and take effect in accordancewith the relevant law for the time being applicable in the Republic ofIndonesia, provided that all disputes hereunder or concerning any of thesubject matter here of shall be finally settled under the Rules of Conciliationand Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by threearbitrators appointed in accordance with the Rules all of whom shall haveinternationally recognized qualifications of such appointment togetherqualifications
    This Agreement and theperformance hereof shall be governed by the laws of the Republic ofIndonesia. Any dispute arising hereunder that directly PT LT shall beHalaman 10 dari 28 hal.Put. Nomor 179 K/Pdt/2016resolved in the manner set forth in Section 9.7. of the Joint VentureAgreement,Terjemahan Tersumpah Pasal 6.4. Novation Agreement 2002:6.4. Hukum yang berlaku dan penyelesaian sengketa;Perjanjian ini dan pelaksanaan atas perjanjian ini tunduk kepada hukumNegara Republik Indonesia.
Register : 03-02-2017 — Putus : 08-03-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 303 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA;
11757 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 303/B/PK/PJK/2017The obligations of PERTAMINA hereunder shall be deemed to havecomplied with by the delivery to CONTRACTOR within one hundred andtwenty (120) days after the end of each Calendar Year, of documentary proofin accordance with the Indonesian fiscal laws that liability for the abovementioned taxes has been satisfied, except that with respect to any of suchliabilities which CONTRACTORS may be obliged to pay directly,PERTAMINA shall reimburse it only out of its share of production
    Bahwa dalam Section IV Pasal 1.3 huruf b kontrak Bagi Hasil Blok RokanAntara Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara(PERTAMINA) dan Pemohon Banding, dinyatakan sebagai berikut:"PERTAMINA shall:(a)(b) Except with respect to CONTRACTOR's obligation to pay the IncomeTax Including final tax on profits after tax deduction as set forth atsubsection 1.2(r) of this Section IV. assume and discharge otherIndonesian taxes of CONTRACTOR including value added tax,transfer tax, import and export duties
    ,;The obligations of PERTAMINA hereunder shall be deemed to havecomplied with the delivery to CONTRACTOR within one hundred andtwenty (120) days after the end of each Calender Year, ofdocumentary proof in accordance with the Indonesian fiscal laws thatliability for the above mentioned taxes has been satisfied, except thatwith repect to any of such liabilities which CONTRACTORS may beobliged to pay directly, PERTAMINA shall reimburse it only out of itsshare of production hereunder within sixty (60
    Overhead AllocationGeneral and Administrative cost, other them direct charges,allocable to this operation should be determined by a detailedstudy, and the method determined by such study shall be appliedeach Year consistenly. The method selected must be approved byPERTAMINA, and such approval can he reviewed periodically byPERTAMINA and the CONTRACTOR."
    The laws Of the Republis of Indonesia shall applyto this Contract, dan?Section IV Rights and Obligations ofthe Parties:CONTRACTOR shall(o) furnish all technical aid, including foreignpersonnel, required for the performance oftheHalaman 35 dari 43 halaman.
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1431/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
4114 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Kegiatan bisnis LNG Kilang LNGArun dan Badak merupakan bagian dari kegiatan usaha huluminyak dan gas bumi sesuai dalam SECTION VI POINT6.2.2 PSC AGREEMENT:Should Pertamina and Contractors consider that theprocessing and utilization of Natural Gas is economical andchoose to participate in the processing and utilization thereof, in addition to that used in secondary recovery operations,then the construction and installation of facilities for suchprocessing and utilizatition shall be carried out pursuant
    eci Sate nt re iaL ErSek gal sungee: t= cesarateCarn calle and debit Aabes by Slane UPSESEQE and paid syFrooucera th agg@erdance with bkhe AeccuntilagSuct ado r ISuch Charges end maywenes shall St cgbbject!) tu adjusemansa 74Previded in the Arterunting Progeduse.: Blwekt om Q5atoe enaltDerat 1iEreanemie 2 opy GE ech cash cail sedicepat note to theTeaekes and Peyluw Agenci=) AS the sane time Such cash cattSe GdeSit oole im traensmicces te Breducarca. Gambar IV.
    Putusan Nomor 1431/B/PK/PJK/2017Peoeveds se Artice 2 Exhibit ABADAK LNG (BONTANG LNG) PROCESSINGAGREEMENT (Amended & Restatted, 1988): Cash CallsFrom tims te tine, a3 Recessaty, Plant Operator shall cashCall from Producers; and Producers shall pay of cause to bepald fo Blant OSperster ia Gi dollars their respectiveshares, separately determined as provided in Section 8.01 ofEhe Agreement, of Projected het cash fquirementa For eqchof:fa) Plane Operating Costa; and(5) the esets of Currently Funded Capital
    Projactsfor a calendar senth OF BOTt thereof, as gat forkh iFash calls.The cash ealig for Plant Operating casts and CurrenclyFunded Capital Projects shall be show Separately aod ahalue fn @Gordaace with Producers" Jztast eatinates of eachSales Contrace's rerecentage as determined under Arktlele 13of the Agreement, Te curing @ year there ghall ba arevision in the esti ;imate of a Sales Conkract's Percentage,Or if the Final determination of such Sales Coftface'sParcentage pursuant to Section 11.02
    TS the ertane Fragkicable, Plant Uperater shall place the
Putus : 07-09-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1512 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 September 2017 — PT NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
21278 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Weighing andsampling shall be done contemporaneously.10.3 Sample Splits.
    When thedifference between the assay results of the parties for copper, goldand silver is within the splitting limits designated below, the exactmean of the assays shall be the settlement assay. In case thevariation between the parties assays exceeds the splitting limitsdesignated below, an umpire shall be selected in rotation from thelist designated below whose assay shall be final, provided it is nothigher or lower than the original assays.
    From the composite sample held by Seller andBuyer, each party, at its own expense, shall assay each of thedesignated impurities. The assay results shall be exchanged within10 Business Days after Buyer's notice to Seller. When the differencebetween the assay results of the parties is within the splitting limitsdesignated below, the exact mean of the assays shall be thesettlement assay.
    In case the variation between the parties assaysexceeds the splitting limits designated below, an umpire shall beselected in rotation from the list designated in paragraph 11.2 whoseassay shall be final, provided it is not higher or lower than theoriginal assays.
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities.11.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Putus : 16-08-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1500 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 16 Agustus 2017 — PT. NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
21880 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For this purpose, Seller shall carry out theweighing, moisture determination and the provisional assay inaccordance with internationally accepted practices. Buyer, at itssole expense, shall have the right to be present and/orrepresented at the time of such weighing, moisture determinationand provisional assaying;9.2 Provisional Payment. Provisional payment of ninety (90) percent9.3of the provisional payment value shall be made by Buyer withinthree (3) Business days after the Date of Arrival.
    Weighing, sampling, samplepreparation and determination of moisture content ofConcentrates shall be conducted by Buyer promptly after receiptof Concentrates. All weighing, lotting, sampling, samplepreparation and determination of moisture content ofConcentrates shall be done at Buyer's smelter in accordance withBuyers standard practice procedures in accordance withaccepted industry standard and with reliable modern equipmentand shall be final for settlement purposes.
    Seller, at its soleexpense, shall have the right to be present and/or represented atthe weighing, sampling, sample preparation and determination ofmoisture content. Failure to be present and/or represented at anyweighing, sampling, sample preparation and moisturedetermination shall be deemed to be a waiver of the right only insuch instance;10.2 Sample Lot. A sample lot of Concentrates shall be approximatelyfive hundred (500) Wet Metric Tonnes.
    When thedifference between the assay results of the parties for copper,gold and silver is within the splitting limits designated below, theexact mean of the assays shall be the settlement assay. In casethe variation between the parties assays exceeds the splittinglimits designated below, an umpire shall be selected in rotationfrom the list designated below whose assay shall be final,provided it is not higher or lower than the original assays.
    In case the variation between theparties assays exceeds the splitting limits designated below, anumpire shall be selected in rotation from the list designated inparagraph 11.2 whose assay shall be final, provided it is nothigher or lower than the original assays.
Register : 12-08-2021 — Putus : 22-09-2021 — Upload : 27-09-2021
Putusan PT SEMARANG Nomor 336/Pdt/2021/PT SMG
Tanggal 22 September 2021 — Pembanding/Tergugat : PT OTA INDONESIA Diwakili Oleh : Joko Yunanto, SH
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT TUNAS SAMUDRA KURNIA
8958
  • INV SMG 190163 A tertanggal 30 November 2019;Bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan pembatasan pertanggungjawaban yangdiatur dalam Ketentuan Perdagangan Umum (General Trading Conditions)dalam "Section General Condition Clause Nomor 15 and 16 TheFIATA Rules for Freight Forwarding Services menyebutkan :15 (i). iN no circumstances whatsoever shall the company be liableto the customer or owner for consequential loss or loss ofmarket however caused;(ii).
    Without prejudice to any other conditions herein orother defences which may be open to the company, Inno circumstances whatsoever shall the company be liable tothe customer or owner for delay or deviation howevercaused in asum in excess of twice the company owncharges in respect of the relevant transaction;16 in no case whatsoever shall any liability of the Company,however arising, and notwithstanding that the cause of loss ordamage be unexplained, exceed;(i).
    Jumlah nilai sebesar USD 1.000,00 per ton dari 1.000kilo bobot kotor barangbarang yang bersangkutan, manayang paling seaikitKemudian dalam Section 2 The Company As Forwarding AgentClause Nomor 25 dalam aturan a quo menyebutkan :25 The company shall not be liable to the customer or owner forlossor damage arising from any noncompliance or misscompliance with the customer's or owner's instruction or for anyfailure to perform whether wholly or in part their obligation (whethersuch obligation arise in
Register : 12-07-2017 — Putus : 07-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1443 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDRERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. INDOCEMENT TUNGGAL PRAKARSA, Tbk;
4432 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In cases when a Certificate of Origin (Form D) is rejected bythe customs authority of the importing Member State, thesubject Certificate of Origin (Form D) shall be markedaccordingly in Box 4 and the original Certificate of Origin (FormD) shall be returned to the issuing authority within a reasonableperiod not exceeding sixty (60) days. The issuing authority shallbe duly notified of the grounds for the denial of tariff preference;3.
    statement based on the current cost and prices, within a sixmonth timeframe, specified at the date of exportation subject to thefollowing conditions:(a) The request for retroactive check shall be accompanied withthe Certificate of Origin (Form D) concerned and shall specifythe reasons and any additional information suggesting that theparticulars given on the said Certificate of Origin (Form D) maybe inaccurate, unless the retroactive check is requested on arandom basis;(b) The issuing authority receiving
    of the retroactive check, paragraph(c) shall be applied Retroactive checks sebagaimanadisebutkan di atas dilakukan tidak terbatas pada keraguanreceiving authority atas origin criteria yang tercantum dalamForm D.
    company, provided that the goods meet therequirements of Chapter 3 of this Agreement;2) The exporter shall indicate "third country invoicing" and suchinformation as name and country of the company issuing theinvoice in the Certificate of Origin (Form D);b.
    Bahwa berdasarkan Overleaf Note Number 10 Annex 7,Operational Certification Procedure For The Rules Of Originmenyatakan sebagai berikut: Third Country Invoicing: In cases where invoices are issued bya third country, "the Third Country Invoicing" box should beticked () and such information as name and country of thecompany issuing the invoice shall be indicated in box 7;3.
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-50159/PP/M.VIII/16/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12234
  • abstrak sehingga tidak mudah diidentifikasi;bahwa sebagai upaya untuk mengetahui bagaimana seharusnya memaknai "penyerahanjasa" sebagaimana tertera pada Pasal 4 huruf c UndangUndang PPN, mengingat belumditemukannya penjelasan yang jelas terkait hal tersebut pada penjelasan undangundang,dapat Terbanding uraikan sebagai berikut :bahwa berdasarkan article tiga puluh satu EU VAT Directive tentang Place of Supply ofGoods dinyatakan bahwa where goods are use dispatched or transported, the place ofsupply shall
    be deemed to be the place where the goods are located at the time when thesupply takes place;bahwa berdasarkan article empat puluh tiga EU VAT Directive tentang General RulesPlace of Supply of Service dinyatakan bahwa the place of supply of service shall bedeemed to be the place where the supplier has established his business or has a fixedestablishment from which the service is supplied, or, in the absence of such a place ofbusiness or fixed establishment, the place where he has his permanent address