Ditemukan 230 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 20-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2100 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 20 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ANEKA INTIPERSADA
3717 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 2100/B/PK/PJK/201 7(removing all VAT embodied in the price of a product bycrediting input tax, while not taxing output);(Pengecualian melanggar logika dasar dari PPN, sebagaipenyimpangan atas aturan umum pengenaan PPN (melaluiPajak Keluaran dan pengkreditan Pajak Masukan) danpengenaan tarif 0% (mengeluarkan unsur PPN di dalam hargasebuah produk dengan mengkreditkan Pajak Masukan dan tidakmengenakan pajak atas penjualan);Bahwa berdasarkan uraian di atas dapat disimpulkan prinsipnetralitas
Register : 24-03-2013 — Putus : 24-07-2013 — Upload : 06-05-2014
Putusan DILMIL I 02 MEDAN Nomor 52-K/PMI-02/AD/III/2013
Tanggal 24 Juli 2013 — PRATU TEUKU M. ALEX PRATAMA, dkk 2 orang
11144
  • Restorative justicesanctions use a balanced approach, producing the least restrictive disposition while stressing theoffenders accountability and providing relief to the victim. The offender may be ordered to makerestitution, to perform community service, or to make amends in some other way that the court orders.(Blacks Law Dictionary, 8th ed. (St.
Putus : 20-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2102 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 20 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ANEKA INTIPERSADA
4324 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sehingga tidak menjadi pertimbangan utama dalampengambilan keputusankeputusan bisnis);bahwa namun demikian dalam International Tax Dialogue, Keyissues and debates in VAT, SME Taxation and the taxtreatment of the financial sector, p.24 dinyatakan:Exemptions violate the basic logic of the VAT, being part waybetween levying a positive VAT rate in the usual way (by taxingoutput and crediting input tax) and applying a zero rate(removing all VAT embodied in the price of a product bycrediting input tax, while
Putus : 20-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2101 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 20 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ANEKA INTIPERSADA
3312 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 2101/B/PK/PJK/201 7(removing all VAT embodied in the price of a product bycrediting input tax, while not taxing output);(Pengecualian melanggar logika dasar dari PPN, sebagaipenyimpangan atas aturan umum pengenaan PPN (melaluiPajak Keluaran dan pengkreditan Pajak Masukan) danpengenaan tarif 0% (mengeluarkan unsur PPN didalam hargasebuah produk dengan mengkreditkan Pajak Masukan dan tidakmengenakan pajak atas penjualan);Bahwa berdasarkan uraian di atas dapat disimpulkan prinsipnetralitas
Register : 17-12-2007 — Putus : 25-03-2009 — Upload : 21-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 408 / Pdt.G / 2007/ PN.Jkt.Pst.
Tanggal 25 Maret 2009 — RICHARD BRUCE NESS
405184
  • This report says yes, there ispollution because there is abnormally high arsenic in thesediment, in the benthos, in the fish and in the groundwater, hesaid.A member of the panel, Hilmi Salim, the coordinator of thecenter for natural resources at Padjadjaran University, saidNewmont was hiding the dark side and only showing the whiteside, by emphasizing data that supported its case, particularly onwater quality standards, while ignoring data that showedpollution, like those on the sediment.Putusan
    All forms of mercury are toxic, and mercuryvapors are extremely toxic, she said.The specialist from the Minamata Institute, Mineshi Sakamoto,who conducted tests for the W.H.O., said that while he did not findMinamata disease, he was convinced that the bay was pollutedfrom mine waste. Newmont finished operations in August. Theenvironment is completely destroyed, and the people becamesick, Mr. Sakamoto said.
    bentukan pemerintah/Koordinator Lembaga PusatSumber Daya Alam Universitas Padjajaran yakni Hilmi Salim,sebagaimana dapat dilihat pada halaman 3 alinea 2 sebagaimanadikutip berikut ini :Halaman 3 alinea 2 Pemberitaan Edisi 9 November 2004A member of the panel, Hilmi Salim, the coordinator of the center ofnatural resources at Padjadjaran University, said Newmont washidinh the dark side and only showing the white side, byemphasizing data that supported its case, particularly on water qualitystandards, while
    Sakamoto, sebagaimana dapat dilihat pada halaman 7 alinea45 sebagaimana dikutip berikut ini :Halaman 7 alinea 45 Pemberitaan Edisi 22 Desember 2004The specialist from the Minamata Institute, Mineshi Sakamoto, whoconducted the tests for the WHO said that while he did not findMinamata disease, he was convinced that the bay was polluted fromthe mine waste. Newmont finished operations in August.The environment is completely destroyed, and the people becamesick, Mr. Sakamoto said.
Putus : 20-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2103 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 20 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ANEKA INTIPERSADA
3921 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sehingga tidak menjadi pertimbangan utama dalampengambilan keputusankeputusan bisnis);bahwa namun demikian dalam International Tax Dialogue, Keyissues and debates in VAT, SME Taxation and the tax treatmentof the financial sector, p.24 dinyatakan:Exemptions violate the basic logic of the VAT, being part waybetween levying a positive VAT rate in the usual way (by taxingoutput and crediting input tax) and applying a zero rate(removing all VAT embodied in the price of a product bycrediting input tax, while
Register : 06-06-2018 — Putus : 28-02-2019 — Upload : 13-08-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 170/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst.
Tanggal 28 Februari 2019 — PT. FREEPORT INDONESIA >< EVA SUSANTI HANDOYO, DKK
215127
  • We look forward to a mutuallypositive and beneficial partnership with Inalum that will continue to providesubstantial benefits to the people of Papua; the Republic of Indonesia; and toour local employees, suppliers and contractors while generating attractivereturns for our shareholders.Yang terjemahannya berbunyi :Perjanjian ini menandai tonggak penting menuju pembentukankemitraan jangka panjang baru dengan Republik Indonesia untukmemberikan stabilitas jangka panjang bagi operasi PT Freeport Indonesia.Melalui
Putus : 08-03-2017 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 276 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT. INDOCEMENT TUNGGA PRAKARSA, TBK
4320 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • concerned and shall specifythe reasons and any additional information suggesting that theparticulars given on the said Certificate of Origin (Form D) maybe inaccurate, unless the retroactive check is requested on arandom basis;(b) The issuing authority receiving a request for retroactive checkshall respond to the request promptly and reply within ninety(90) days after the receipt of the request;(c) The customs authorities of the importing Member State maysuspend the provisions on preferential treatment while
Putus : 15-12-2016 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 196 PK/Pid.Sus/2015
Tanggal 15 Desember 2016 — RIDWAN PANJAITAN, S.Psi
12869 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Victims take anactive role in the process, while offenders are encouraged to take responsibilityfor their actions, to repair the harm theyve done by apologizing.
Putus : 08-03-2017 — Upload : 31-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 266/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PREMIER DISTRIBUTION
11498 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • It is also possible that the different points in arange represent the fact that independent enterprisesengaged in comparable transactions under comparablecircumstances may not establish exactly the same price forthe transaction.Par 3.57It may also be the case that, while every effort has beenmade to exclude points that have a lesser degree ofcomparability, what is arrived at is a range of figures forwhich it is considered, given the process used for selectingcomparables and limitations in information
Register : 05-01-2010 — Putus : 11-11-2010 — Upload : 26-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 02/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel.,
Tanggal 11 Nopember 2010 — PT. PUKUAFU INDAH M E L A W A N: MARTIONO HADIANTO, MARTIONO HADIANTO,
285243
  • Newmont Nusa Tenggara tidak memilikisaham divestasi karena itu tidak wajib melakukan divestasi sehinggatidak mungkin in default (breach of agreement)Putusan inidirekayasa dan dapat dikategorikan sebagai tipu muslihat yang tidakseharusnya dikeluarkan oleh Arbitrase Internasional ;Order PTNNT to divest 17 % of its shares consisting of 3 % of 2006and 7 5 of 2007 shares to the Regional Government, while 7 % of2008 shares shall be divested to the Government of Indonesia, All thesaid obligations shall
Register : 27-12-2016 — Putus : 27-04-2017 — Upload : 20-06-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 907/Pdt.G.KPPU/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 27 April 2017 — - PT. COSL INDO - PT. HUSKY – CNOOC Madura Limited Lawan KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU)
428621
  • Bidders shall submit Confirmation Letter of delivery equipmentfor 6 months from contract award (while performing modification required forBD).4. Bidders shall submit Valid MIGAS or International Well ControlForum (IWCF) certificate of Offshore Installation Manager (OIM), ToolPusher, Driller, Derrick man and Roughneck.5. Bidders shall submit MoU Letter between Contractor and Rigowner (if Contractor is not a Rig owner).6.
    Bidders shall submit Confirmation letter of deliveryequipment for 6 months from contract award(while perfoming modification required for BD).Atas persyaratan tersebut, PT COSL INDOmelampirkan personil dalam dokumenpenawarannya sebagai berikut: YEARSNATIONALITYYEARS WITHNO NAME POSITION TOTAL(AGE) OFFSHORE = CONTRACTOREXPERIENCE1 Sateesh Balakrishnan MODU Manager Indian 11 2(Rig Manager) (33)2 Mark DarganMC Claggan Assistant Rig Manager American 41 1 Hal113 dari 434 Hal Putusan Nomor 907/Pdt.GKPPU
    OfficeTecnical Evaluation Criteria (Mandatory):Bidders shall submit Original Companys Statement Letter of Local Content Level(Technical) which has been signed by authorized person.Bidders shall submit and meet all equipment criteria stipulated in Exhibit A1 (Jack UpDrilling Rig).Bidders shall submit list of personnel and their CV for this project fulfilling therequirements as stipulated in Exhibit A2. 1.Bidders shall submit Confirmation letter of delivery equipment for 6 months fromcontract award (while
    BidderContractualseeks Clarification concerningrequirement for proposed JUDrilling Rig Services Contract.Would Company accept responsibility forand assume full liability for any and all costsrelated to the repair or replacement for lossof or damage to Contractors property andequipment which occurs while the propertyand equipment are down hole, regardless ifthese property and equipment are insuredby Contractor (above deductible amounts)?
Register : 15-10-2018 — Putus : 24-03-2020 — Upload : 21-07-2020
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 993/Pdt.P/2018/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 24 Maret 2020 — 1.Sangeeta Ramchand 2.Jotty Harry AljotyMelwani 3.ShaliniNanikChadiramani 4.Deepak BhagwandasDodani lawan 1.PT Gambir Trading co 2.Dr. Otto Hasibuan, SH, MM
652424
  • Jashan Atmaram Sadaranganiatau dikenal juga dengan nama Jashan Atmaram Sadarangani(As Jashan) atau dikenal juga dengan nama Jashan Atmaram(As Jashan) melalui Kedutaan Besar India sebagaimana SuratKedutaan Besar India tanggal 11 Juni = 2018,No.JAK/CONS/415/8/2018 yang pada intinya menyatakansebagai berikut:Kutipan The Embassy has been informed by relatives of late A,SJashan that he died on 8" July 2016, while working as ManagingDirector of PT.Gambir Trading Company Ltd.
    Jashan Atmaram Sadarangani ataudikenal juga dengan nama Jashan Atmaram Sadarangani (As Jashan)atau dikenal juga dengan nama Jashan Atmaram (As Jashan) melaluiKedutaan Besar India sebagaimana Surat Kedutaan Besar India tanggal11 Juni 2018, No.JAK/CONS/415/8/2018 yang pada intinya menyatakansebagai berikut:Kutipan The Embassy has been informed by relatives of late A,S Jashan that hedied on 8" July 2016, while working as Managing Director of PT.GambirTrading Company Lid.
Author : Rahmad Setiawan; J. Satrio;
Cessie
715513660
  • Beberapa segi lembaga hukum cessie perlu mendapat perhatian, yaitu1. pengertian tentang cessie perlu diseragamkan agar dalam pelaksanaannya bisa  menghasilkan keputusan yang baik;2. bahwa penyerahan benda-benda tak bertubuh yang bukan berupa ... [Selengkapnya]
  • If, for instance, thedebitor cessus writes to the assignor that he has taken cognisance of the instrumentof assignment and will pay to the assignee, whereupon the assignor confirms thereceipt of the letter while expressing thanks and not giving any further comment, anotification as referred to in art. 3:94 par. 1 BW can be established.E.
Register : 23-01-2017 — Putus : 31-03-2017 — Upload : 05-01-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 39/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 31 Maret 2017 — PT.ASURANSI TOKIO MARINE INDONESIA CQ JOSEF GUNAWAN SETYO >< ITOCHU LOGISTICS (EUROPE) GMBH CQ KOICHI TSUTAMURA CS
196132
  • While damaged against themachine as the result of hard impact by uknown object mostprobably occurred during unloading or loading at the transhipmentport or during discharging at the unloading port";Terjemahan bebas :"berdasarkan alur pengiriman cargo tersebut, kami menyakinibahwa kerusakan terhadap mesin tersebut terjadi setelah"Jaminan Laporan Kerugian sampai tanggal 23 Agustus 2014";Tetapi kerusakkan terhadap mesin sebagai akibat adanyabenturan keras oleh objek yang tidak diketahui sangat mungkinterjadi
Register : 17-09-2015 — Putus : 02-08-2016 — Upload : 09-01-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 424 /Pdt.G/2015/PN.Jkt. Pst
Tanggal 2 Agustus 2016 — PT. ASURANSI TOKIO MARINE INDONESIA Cq. Josef Gunawan Setyo selaku Direktur PT. ASURANSI TOKIO MARINE INDONESIA >< ITOCHU LOGISTICS (EUROPE) GmbH, Cq Koichi Tsutamura,Cs
309118
  • While damaged against the machine as the result of HARDIMPACT BY UKNOWN OBJECT MOST PROBABLY occurred duringUNLOADING OR LOADING at the transhipment port OR DURINGDISCHARGING AT THE UNLOADING PORT."Halaman 85 Putusan Nomor: 424/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Jkt.PstTerjemahan bebas:berdasarkan alur pengiriman cargo tersebut, kami menyakini bahwakerusakan terhadap mesin tersebut terjadi setelah "Jaminan LaporanKerugian sampai tanggal 23 Agustus 2014".
Putus : 04-08-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 375 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 4 Agustus 2015 — PT. YASULOR INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
272260 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • pricing namun pada dasarnya terdapatketerbatasan informasi yang diperoleh dalam database komersial oleh karenaitu, untuk mengeliminasi kerentanan terhadap ketidaksebandingan dariperusahaan pembanding yang dipilih, maka digunakan /nterquartile range;Bahwa I/nterquartile range dapat mengeliminasi kerentanan terhadapketidaksebandingan dari pembanding yang dipilih, hal ini juga diungkapkandalam Paragraf 3.57 OECD Transfer pricing Guidelines 2010 yangmenyebutkan bahwa: "/t may also be the case that, while
Register : 08-10-2019 — Putus : 16-12-2019 — Upload : 18-12-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 623/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 16 Desember 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : SUMATRA PARTNERS LLC Diwakili Oleh : YUNILLA NURHALIM SH LL M
Terbanding/Tergugat I : MARDJONO REKSODIPUTRO
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Ricky S Nazir
Terbanding/Tergugat III : EMIR NURMANSYAH
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : NAFIS ADWANI
Terbanding/Tergugat V : RITA TYASTUTI TAUFIK
Terbanding/Tergugat VI : AGUS AHADI DERADJAT
Terbanding/Tergugat VII : WOODY PANANTO
Terbanding/Tergugat VIII : CHANDRAWATI DEWI
Terbanding/Tergugat IX : LUKY I WALALANGI
Terbanding/Tergugat X : SAHAT M SIAHAAN
Terbanding/Tergugat XI : HERRY NURYANTO KURNIAWAN
Terbanding/Tergugat XII : Nurdin Adiwibowo
Terbanding/Tergugat XIII : FREDDY KARYADI
Terbanding/Tergugat XIV : Yanny M. Suryaretina
Terbanding/Tergugat XV : Ayik Chandrawulan Gunadi
Terbanding/Tergugat XVI : KEVIN OMAR SIDHARTA
Terbanding/Tergugat XVII : Indra Setiawan
Terbanding/Tergugat XVIII : Miriam Andreta
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat I : PT Bangun Karya Pratama Lestari BKPL
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II
8812803
  • From the date ofthe agreements, we note that the Bahasa version is dated January 18,2011 while the English version is dated October 25, 2010. We assumedthat they are two different contracts.
Upload : 22-09-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 28 PK/Pid.Sus/2011
Dr.Frans H. Winarta SH.MH(Kuasa Pemohon); Scott Anthony Rush
411393 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sebagai pertentangan antar putusan" ;Selain itu, patut juga disimak pandangan Prof.Andrew Byrnes dalam Report on International LegalIssues Relating to the Trial, conviction andsentencing of Scott Anthony Rush under the NationalNarcotics Law of Indonesia, bulan April 2010 (videLampiran 8), butir c, halaman 35 dan 36, yangmenyatakan bahwa "violation of Articles 14 (1) and 26,ICCPR and Article 6, ICCPR: the imposition by onepanel of the Supreme Court of a death sentence on thedefendant Scott Rush while
Register : 24-06-2020 — Putus : 27-07-2020 — Upload : 26-11-2020
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 16/PID.TPK/2020/PT BDG
Tanggal 27 Juli 2020 — Pembanding/Penuntut Umum I : BUDI NUGRAHA
Terbanding/Terdakwa : DJOKO SAPUTRO.
292189
  • lampirannya1 (Satu) bundel asli dokumen Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (RKT & Il) RKAP tahun 2017.Halaman 68 dari 238 putusan Nomor 16/TIPIKOR/2020/PT BDG.216.217.218.219.220.221.222.223.224.1 (satu) bundel printout warna dokumen Rapat Rutin Direksi DenganDewan Pengawas Bulan Juli 2017 Perum Jasa Tirta Il Bandung, 26 Juli20171 (Satu) bundel asli dokumen Tanda Terima Surat Direktur Utama Tahun20171 (satu) bundel printout warna dokumen Laporan Triwulan Ill Tahun20161 (satu) buah buku catatan merek While
    tentang Rencana KerjaTriwulan (RKT) tahun 2018 Program Investasi Perum Jasa Tirta Ilbeserta lampirannya1 (satu) bundel asli dokumen Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (RKT & Il) RKAP tahun 2017.1 (Satu) bundel printout warna dokumen Rapat Rutin Direksi DenganDewan Pengawas Bulan Juli 2017 Perum Jasa Tirta II Bandung, 26 Juli20171 (Satu) bundel asli dokumen Tanda Terima Surat Direktur Utama Tahun20171 (Satu) bundel printout warna dokumen Laporan Triwulan III Tahun 20161 (satu) buah buku catatan merek While