Ditemukan 817 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 14-08-2017 — Upload : 14-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 795 K/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017
Tanggal 14 Agustus 2017 — PT KALPATARU INVESTAMA VS SING GLOBAL OIL PRODUCTS PTE. LTD
6501004 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Do you agree that the principle of ex aequo et bono can also apply incases relating to agreements pertaining to amicable settlement?Atau secara bebas pertanyaan Arbitrator SIAC dapat diartikan:Halaman 10 dari 43 hal. Put. Nomor 795 K/Padt.SusArbt/2017Apakah anda setuju bahwa prinsip ex aequo et bono dapat jugaditerapkan terhadap perjanjian yang berisi penyelesaian perdamaian?A.
    Termination:The Parties hereby agree that as at the Closing Date, the TransactionAgreement shall be terminated and cease to have any force or effect, andthe rights and obligations of the respective Parties shall be extinguished";Terjemahan resmi:"2. PengakhiranPara Pihak dengan ini sepakat bahwa terhitung sejak TanggalPenutupan, PerjanjianPerjanjian Transaksi harus dihentikan dan tidakHalaman 20 dari 43 hal. Put.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1831 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
22588 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:Halaman 7 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1831/B/PK/PJK/2017BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionHalaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1831/B/PK/PJK/2017under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 29-08-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT CNOOC SES Ltd vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
7348 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumptionthat CONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by any taxtreaty to which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.In the event that, subsequently, any portion of CONTRACTOR 's participatinginterest
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSCversi terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1829 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
243190 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by any tax treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Register : 05-11-2020 — Putus : 25-11-2020 — Upload : 30-11-2020
Putusan PN TAIS Nomor 76/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tas
Tanggal 25 Nopember 2020 — Penuntut Umum:
1.REDO ARLIANSYAH, S.H.
2.SARI PRILIYANA, S.H.
3.DODI YANSAH PUTRA, S.H.
Terdakwa:
REDI Bin Alm. SRI LAMIJA
133104
  • /strong>Yeka Epita Sari Binti Yondri;

    • 1 (satu) pucuk Senjata Api Rakitan warna hitam;
    • 4 (empat) butir Amunisi Organic;
    • 1 (satu) bilah Parang;

    Dirampas untuk dimusnahkan;

    • 1 (satu) lembar Baju Kaos lengan Panjang warna abu-abu bertuliskan New York City;
    • 1 (satu) lembar dasar Panjang warna hitam;
    • 1 (satu) lembar Celana dalam warna abu-abu bergariskan merah merek Agree
    Menyatakan Barang Bukti berupa : 1 (Satu) lembar Baju warna merah biru kuningmerk Mouse Girl 1 (Satu) lembar baju kaos dalam warna putih 1 (Satu) lembar celana panjang bergambar 1 (satu) lembar celana dalam bergambarbebekDikembalikan kepada anak korban1 (satu) lembar Celana dalam warna hitam abuabu bergaris merahmerk AGREE SPORT. 1 (satu) Lembar baju kaos lengan panjangwarna abuabu bertuliskan New York Citty 1 (satu) Lembar celana dasar panjang warnahitamDikembalikan kepada terdakwa 1 (satu) Pucuk
    pucuk Senjata Api Rakitan warna hitam, 4(empat) butir Amunisi Organic, dan 1 (satu) bilan Parang, telah dipergunakanuntuk melakukan kejahatan dan dikhawatirkan akan dipergunakan untukmengulangi kejahatan, maka perlu ditetapkan agar barang bukti tersebut:dirampas untuk dimusnahkan;Oleh karena barang bukti berupa 1 (Satu) lembar Baju Kaos lengan Panjangwarna abuabu bertuliskan New York City, 1 (Satu) lembar dasar Panjangwarna hitam, dan 1 (Satu) lembar Celana dalam warna abuabu bergariskanmerah merek Agree
Register : 04-10-2022 — Putus : 01-12-2022 — Upload : 06-12-2022
Putusan PN BOJONEGORO Nomor 161/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Bjn
Tanggal 1 Desember 2022 — Penuntut Umum:
NURAINI PRIHATIN, S.H.,M.Hum
Terdakwa:
KHOIRUR ROZIKIN Bin MARJUKI
396
  • 1 (satu) buah sarung guling warna hijau;

    Dikembalikan kepada yang berhak yaitu Tri Sumartini Rahayu;

    10. 1 (satu) buah kaos oblong warna biru;

    11. 1 (satu) buah celana pendek warna abu-abu;

    12. 1 (satu) unit Hp merk Redmi warna abu-abu;

    13. 1 (satu) unit sepeda motor Honda Vario warna hitam Nopol S 4344 GD tanpa STNK beserta kunci kontak;

    14. 1 (satu) buah CD warna ungu merk Agree;

    Dikembalikan kepada Terdakwa Khoirur Rozikin Bin

Register : 26-10-2023 — Putus : 21-12-2023 — Upload : 21-12-2023
Putusan PN YOGYAKARTA Nomor 388/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Yyk
Tanggal 21 Desember 2023 — Penuntut Umum:
FITRI LUWIYAN, SH
Terdakwa:
MICHAEL GIOVANNI PAMUNGKAS AJIE Bin GUNTUR PRADIPTA PUTRA
498
  • MUHAMMAD RAFA NURIL MUSYAFA;
1 (satu) lembar fotocopy kartu keluarga NO. 3471130509001042;
9 (sembilan) lembar foto;
1 (satu) buah celana dalam merk AGREE ukuran M warna abu-abu;
Dikembalikan kepada saksi MUHAMMAD RAFA NURIL MUSYAFA.
Register : 16-12-2022 — Putus : 24-01-2023 — Upload : 17-09-2023
Putusan PN SANGATTA Nomor 399/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Sgt
Tanggal 24 Januari 2023 — Penuntut Umum:
Bayu Nurhadi, S.H.
Terdakwa:
KASDAM QURANSYAH Als ADAM Bin SYAHRUL ISKANDAR
1911
  • sekolah baju lengan panjang warna putih merk PELAJAR;
  • 1 (satu) lembar celana dalam bergambar kartun warna biru-hijau-kuning;

(Dikembalikan kepada Anak Korban);

  • 1 (satu) lembar Jersey lengan panjang warna biru bergaris hitam-putih merk SPECIAL;
  • 1 (satu) lembar celana jeans panjang warna hitam merk NOMADEN;
  • 1 (satu) lembar celana pendek warna Abu-abu merk DG;
  • 1 (satu) lembar celana dalam warna Abu-abu merk Agree
Register : 29-11-2018 — Putus : 17-12-2018 — Upload : 08-01-2020
Putusan PN Pulau Punjung Nomor 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Plj
Tanggal 17 Desember 2018 — Terdakwa
13967
  • berwarna abu abu;
  • 1(satu) helai bra berwarna pink bermotif bunga;
  • 1 (satu) helai celana dalam berwarna pink;
  • 1 (satu) helai daster berwarna putih bermotif bunga;
  • 1 (satu) helai handuk bergaris kotak berwarna hijau bertuliskan clasic;

Dikembalikan kepada Anak Korban Laras Shinta PanggilanLaras;

  • 1 (satu) helai celana dalam berwarna hijau bertulisan agree
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1828 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
273229 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Register : 26-04-2017 — Putus : 08-06-2017 — Upload : 04-07-2019
Putusan PA BATURAJA Nomor 42/Pdt.P/2017/PA.Bta
Tanggal 8 Juni 2017 — Pemohon melawan Termohon
175
  • perkawinan antara calonmempelai wanita dan calon mempelai lakilaki dapat membahayakan kedua calonmempelai berupa perzinahan dan dapat pula membahayakan orang lain yaitu aibbagi kedua orang tua calon mempelai dan masyarakat setempatHalaman 19 dari 23 halam Penetapan No. 0042/Padt.P/2017/PA.BtaDisclaimer Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia berusaha untuk selalu mencantumkan informasi paling kini dan akurat sebagai bentuk komitmen Mahkamah Agung untuk p publik, p idan fungsi pDalam ree agree
Register : 14-12-2021 — Putus : 04-01-2022 — Upload : 04-01-2022
Putusan PA Ngamprah Nomor 746/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Nph
Tanggal 4 Januari 2022 — Pemohon melawan Termohon
2023
  • DanAllah Maha Luas pemberiannya lagi Maha Mengetahul;Hadits Rasulullah SAW (Kitab Subulus Salam juz II halaman 110):D gling ale al hee atl Jgwy WE aie atl 2) agree Cy atl Le Oepel feel ob cared Geld!
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
9761 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa ketentuan yang melarang penerapan tarif P3B baru mulai dicantumkandalam PSC terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut:"BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under ArticleHalaman 7 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/201726 (4) of the Indonesian Income tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treatyto which the Government
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):Halaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Register : 04-10-2017 — Putus : 02-11-2017 — Upload : 10-07-2019
Putusan PA BATURAJA Nomor 1217/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Bta
Tanggal 2 Nopember 2017 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
123
  • No. 1217/Pdt.G/2017/PA.BtaDisclaimer Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia berusaha untuk selalu mencantumkan informasi paling kini dan akurat sebagai bentuk komitmen Mahkamah Agung untuk p publik, p idan ili fungsi pDalam ree agree inakurasi inforpasi yan erp situs atau iorraayen eign fa, namun belum tersedia, maka harap segera hubungi Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI melalui :emai: KE DANICCladn tid aManagu omerey Telp : 021384 3348 (ext.318) PikeLrDisclaimerKepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik
Putus : 01-06-2012 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 648 PK/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 1 Juni 2012 — PT. IGAS UTAMA vs PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA
12659 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Kesepakatan Pengakhiran (Termination) BOT Agreementyang ditanda tangani oleh Pelawan dan Terlawan pada tanggal 22November 2007, yang kemudian dimuat dalam Putusan BANI (yangdiajukan oleh Pelawan karena Terlawan telah wanprestasi).Pengakhiran BOT Agreement berdasarkan Persetujuan Bersamatersebut adalah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 20 ayat 1 BOTAgreement (juncto Pasal 23 ayat 3 BOT Agreement) yangmenyatakan bahwa,:This Agreement can not be terminated unless agreed by both parties.Both parties hereby agree
Register : 13-11-2017 — Putus : 20-02-2018 — Upload : 03-07-2019
Putusan PA BATURAJA Nomor 1351/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Bta
Tanggal 20 Februari 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
165
  • Dalam hal Anda agree inakurasi inforpasi y8 Se situs pias Gung seharusnya ada, namun belum tersedia, maka harap segera hubungi Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI melalui:emai: KEDQANICElaan aManagu QO.10 rep : 021384 3348 (ext. 318)Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesiaputusan.mahkamahagung.go.id4. Membayar leasing; 5. Keperluan anakanak sekolah;6.
Register : 16-06-2011 — Putus : 19-08-2013 — Upload : 05-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put. 46602/PP/M.X/99/2013
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2013 — Penggugat dan Tergugat
18666
  • We therefore agree that our twoCompetent Authorities should discuss and seek to resolve the application presented byour respective taxpayers. To facilitate the process forward, we would appreciate it ifyou could explain to us the Indonesian Tax Authority's considerations and basis for theadjustments made to income on XXX for the fiscal year 20006.5.
Register : 06-10-2021 — Putus : 21-10-2021 — Upload : 23-12-2021
Putusan PN TEMANGGUNG Nomor 5/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Tmg
Tanggal 21 Oktober 2021 — Terdakwa
1160
  • bukti berupa :

    - 1 (satu) setel celana dan baju warna pink kombinasi putih motif bola bergambar hello kitty,

    - 1 (satu) potong celana dalam warna kuning,

    - baju kotak berwarna hitam putih merek SAIL atas kantong kiri bertuliskan XXA-541L dan atas kantong kanan SCOTER,

    - celana pendek warna hitam bergambar PUMA, dan

    - celana dalam warna biru merek AGREE

Putus : 13-04-2009 — Upload : 02-10-2017
Putusan PN PUTUSSIBAU Nomor 05/Pid.B/2009/PN.Ptsb
Tanggal 13 April 2009 — SUKARYONO Bin S. SUSANTO (AIm.)
7034
  • Mayat memakai celan dalam dari kaos berwarna hijau tuadengan merek agree;3) Kaku mayat dan lebam mayat belum ada;4) Mayat adalah seorang lakilaki, bangsa Indonesia, berumur kurang lebih tigapuluh lima tahun, kulit berwarna sawo matang, gizi baik, panjang tubuh seratus 4enam putuh sembilan centimeter, berat tubuh kurang febih tujuh putuh timakilogram dan zakar disunat;5) Terdapat tato pada dada sebelah kiri atas bergambar jangkar dan bungabunga,pada lengan atas sebelah kanan terdapat tato bergambar
Register : 03-11-2023 — Putus : 05-03-2024 — Upload : 05-03-2024
Putusan PN KUALA KAPUAS Nomor 209/Pid.B/2023/PN Klk
Tanggal 5 Maret 2024 — Penuntut Umum:
WIWIEK SURYANI, S.H
Terdakwa:
MUSTIKA RAHAYU Alias RAMA Binti DARSONO
2916
  • permohonan restitusi tidak dapat diterima;
  • Menetapkan barang bukti berupa :
    • 1 (satu) buah handphone merk Apple jenis IPHONE 11 Pro Max 256 GB wama hijau beserta kotak;
    • 1 (satu) buah palu bertuliskan CAMEL 250G warna orange hitam;
    • 1 (satu) buah handphone merk Apple jenis IPHONE 11 Pro Max 256 GB warna gold beserta kotak;
    • Uang tunai sebesar Rp 10.700.000,- (sepuluh juta tujuh ratus ribu rupiah);
    • 1 (satu) buah celana dalam merk AGREE