Ditemukan 816 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : agnes agoes agris adref apren agres agreet agren agrey agrie
Pengadilan PT BANDUNG Perdata
Register : 03-01-2019 — Putus : 25-03-2019 — Upload : 20-07-2020
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 7/PDT/2019/PT BDG
Tanggal 25 Maret 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat : PT SINAR GALUH PRATAMA
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA VIII
246 — 352
  • melawan Sohandi Kawilarang yang intinyamenyatakan:Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/D0/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diasuransikan bahwaAll differences arising out of this policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in differences or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan PN TANGERANG Pidana Umum
Register : 08-11-2021 — Putus : 04-01-2022 — Upload : 04-01-2022
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 1776/Pid.B/2021/PN Tng
Tanggal 4 Januari 2022 — Penuntut Umum:
ADIB FACHRI DILLI,SH.
Terdakwa:
ZAMZAM RHOSEDYA BIN H. SUPENA
288 — 123
  • Mitra Adira Utama Laporan prosedur yang disepakati (Agree Upon Procedure) untuk tahun 2016 2020 dan laporan Auditor Independen; dan
  • 1 (satu) bundel printout rekening koran no rekening 343510502 an. PT. Patra Mitra Bandara dimulai dari April 2017 sampai dengan Februari 2019,

Dilampirkan didalam berkas perkara

  • 1 (satu) unit Handphone Merk Xiaomi type Redmi Note 5 warna hitam beserta Simcard dengan merk dagang XL No 087788238989.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1434/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (Persero) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
51 — 29 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • BadakNGL Co. atas cash advance jasa pengolahan LNG.Payment Instruction tersebut diterbitkan atas dasarTRUSTEE AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT(1974): ARTICLE 6Deseussesc=ne ce Worse Koxesreecr=o eocessrro CeanomsS12 Pertermines and the Contractors shall submit to the Trustee 62 FPertamina and the Contesstors shall agree with the Tiqmuefaction (Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of Fumd= Gambar VII. TRUSTEE AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT(1974):c.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 23-03-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 23 Maret 2016 — PT. FEGA INDOTAMA lawan LVMH FRAGRANCES & COSMETICS (Singapore) PTE. LTD
439 — 381 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • perkara ini sesuai Pasal 2UndangUndang Nomor 14/1970 khususnya memori penjelasanPasal tersebut;(g) Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 794 K/Sip/1982 tanggal 27Januari 1983, yang pada pokoknya menyatakan:"Memperhatikan Policy Nomor 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978(surat bukti P. 1) di bawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikanbahwa all differences arising out of this Policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in witing by the parties indifference or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Kepailitan
Putus : 12-05-2016 — Upload : 23-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 111 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016
Tanggal 12 Mei 2016 — PT MULTILINE SHIPPING SERVICES VS PT MULTILINTAS AGUNG PERKASA
262 — 152 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., M.H.Biayabiaya Kasasi:Te AGREE sssics conrwecaners axmnmie :Rp 6.000,002. RedakSi ....... eee Rp 5.000,003. Administrasi Kasasi.... :Rp4.989.000,00JUMIAN 00 eee eeeeeeeeeeee :Rp5.000.000,00Untuk SalinanMAHKAMAH AGUNG R.1.An. PaniteraPanitera Muda Perdata KhususRAHMI MULYATI, S.H., M.H.NIP : 19591207 1985 12 2 002 Halaman 59 dari 59 hal. Put. Nomor 111 K/Padt.SusPailit/2016
Pengadilan PN MATARAM Perdata
Register : 13-01-2021 — Putus : 10-05-2021 — Upload : 17-05-2021
Putusan PN MATARAM Nomor 17/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2021/PN Mtr
Tanggal 10 Mei 2021 — Penggugat:
PT Freedive Flow Indonesia
Tergugat:
1.PT Windmolen Ocean
2.Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia
494 — 206
  • Putusan BANIbersifat final dan mengikat Para Pihak.Article 13.2The PARTIES agree to resolve any controversies and/or dispute("Dispute") arising of and/or related to the implementation of theprovisions of this AGREEMENT, including any question regarding theirexistence, validity or termination, in an amicable way, if the dispute cannotbe settled amicable within 30 (thirty) days from the Dispute arises, thematter will be settled in accordance with the provisions and proceduralrules of the National Board
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 21-02-2017 — Putus : 21-08-2017 — Upload : 17-10-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 101/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 21 Agustus 2017 — Anton Susanto , Berkedudukan di Central Park Residences C-05/02 Kelurahan Tanjung Duren, RT.009, RW.006, Kecamatan Grogol Petamburan, Kota Jakarta Barat, Provinsi DKI Jakarta Indonesia, dalam hal ini memberikan kuasa kepada TIUR H. HUTAGALUNG, S.H., M.H., C.I.L,dkk beralamat di H.B.L & PARTNERS LAW FIRM berkedudukan di Belleza Tower, Lantai 8 Off 5, Jalan Arteri Soepeno Nomor 34 Permata Hijau, Kebayoran Lama, Kota Jakarta Selatan berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tanggal 08 Pebruari 2017, selanjutnya disebut sebagai PENGGUGAT ;
232 — 119
  • Bahwa menurut butir 15.0 dalam Perjanjian Sewa aquo, tentang JamOperasional Normal, menyatakan bahwa :The Lessee Agrees to adhere to operational hour of the FOODAVENUE, Upon the occurrence of any event of default by thelessee where the Lessee does not adhere to the full operationalhour, the lessee agree to pay a penalty of Rp. 500.000, (fiveHundred Thousand Rupiah) per day for each offence.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 29-06-2021 — Putus : 24-08-2021 — Upload : 30-11-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 315/PDT/2021/PT DKI
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2021 — Pembanding/Tergugat III : Samadhi Capital Consulting Pte. Ltd Diwakili Oleh : Samadhi Capital Consulting Pte. Ltd
Pembanding/Tergugat IV : Lego Industry Pte. Ltd Diwakili Oleh : Samadhi Capital Consulting Pte. Ltd
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT Arsynergy Resources Diwakili Oleh : LONTOH & PARTNERS
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat I : Technics Offshore Engineering Pte., Ltd
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT Technics Offshore Jaya
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat V : PT Mega Altra Titan
121 — 104
  • In the event the arbitrators selected by both Partiesare unable to agree on the selection of a third arbitrator withinsuch thirty day period, either party may request that the thirdarbitrator be selected by BANI.d. No arbitration arising out of or relating to this Agreement shallinclude, by consolidation or enjoinder or in any other manner,an additional person or entity not a Party to this Agreementexcept by written consent of both Parties.e.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1430/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
35 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Vo the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustes shall, promptly upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Bodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to he agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalle to
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pajak Pajak Pertambahan NilaiPPN
Putus : 16-08-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1500 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 16 Agustus 2017 — PT. NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
205 — 67 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Data/Informasi Internet www.mineweb.com; Freeport to pay Mitsubishi 70 percent more for copper TC/RCParagraf 4:Halaman 38 dari 194 halaman Putusan Nomor 1500/B/PK/PJK/2017Reports have said 2009 processing fees between MitsubishiMaterials and Freeport were set at $75 a tonne and 7.5 cents apound, compared to estimates of $ 45 and 4.5 cents in 2008;Freeport, Jiangxi agree almost 60 percent increase in copperTC/RC Paragraf 3:Large Chinese copper smelters, including Jiangxi Copper,received TC/RC of $
    If the umpires assay ishigher than the higher or lower than the lower of the originalassays, the middle one of the original assays shall be final;Splitting Limits:Arsenic (As) 0.03 percentBismuth (Bi) 0.01 percentAntimony (Sb) 0.01 percentLead (Pb) 0.3 percentZinc (Zn) 0.3 percentFluorine (F) 50 ppmChlorine (Cl) 0.005 percentMercury (Hg) 3 ppmNickel (Ni) + Cobalt (Co) 0.1 percentAlumina (Al203) 0.2 percentIf the parties agree to add additional impurities to the list set forthabove pursuant to paragraphs
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities;Halaman 129 dari 194 halaman Putusan Nomor 1500/B/PK/PJK/201711.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Pengadilan PN TANJUNG PINANG Perdata
Register : 24-06-2016 — Putus : 27-12-2016 — Upload : 23-05-2017
Putusan PN TANJUNG PINANG Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2016/PN Tpg
Tanggal 27 Desember 2016 — NICHOLAS MARK OGDEN( Penggugat) PT. BINTAN LAGOON RESOR ( Tergugat)
110 — 33
  • TpgPasal 17.2 PERJANJIAN INDUK(kutipan):The parties hereto agree to submitto the nonexclusive jurisdiction ofthe Indonesian court.Pasal 21.2 PERJANJIANPENGELOLAAN (kutipan):The Second Party herebyirrevocably ad unconditionallysubmit to the nonexclusifjurisdiction of teh courts of theRepublic of Indonesia fordetermining any dispute concerningthis Agreement or the transactionscontemplated by this Agreement...Terjemahannya (kutipan):Para pihak dalam perjanjian inisetuju untuk tunduk pada yurisdiksinoneksklusif
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 21-07-2020 — Putus : 21-09-2021 — Upload : 21-09-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 555/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 21 September 2021 — Penggugat:
PT. SPIE OIL and GAS SERVICES INDONESIA
Tergugat:
SAMIR ABBES,
322 — 282
  • The parties agree after discussion andnegotiation that in order to provide both parties with a fairand accessible forum operating in the English or Frenchlanguage for resolving disputes that may arise out of theemployment relationship, any disputes arising under thisContract of Employment that cannot be resolved amicablyHalaman 26 dari 69 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 555/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 07-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1427/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 September 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO), vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
38 — 26 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • To the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustes shall, prompily upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Podok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,Porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contrastors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalde to
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1429/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Feos. lo the extent that fonds are then held inthe Badak Poyment Account the Trustee shall, prompily upon reeeiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has heen approved for payment, poy to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,pursuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertanina and the Contrastors shall agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1428/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
45 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • I'o the extent hat funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promptly upon reeeiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Com.pooy from the Bodok Payment Account the amount af such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on apprepriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyaldc to
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pajak Pajak Pertambahan NilaiPPN
Putus : 07-09-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1512 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 September 2017 — PT NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
199 — 64 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • daripadanya yangmungkin bertentangan dengan kewajiban internasionalPemerintah atau didasarkan kepada pertimbanganpertimbanganpolitik luar negeri yang mempengaruhi kepentingan nasionalIndonesia;Data/Informasi Internet www.mineweb.com; Freeport to pay Mitsubishi 70 percent more for copper TC/RCParagraft 4:Reports have said 2009 processing fees between MitsubishiMaterials and Freeport were set at $75 a tonne and 7.5 centsa pound, compared to estimates of $ 45 and 4.5 cents in2008; Freeport, Jiangxi agree
    If the umpires assay is higher than the higher orlower than the lower of the original assays, the middle one of theoriginal assays shall be final.Splitting Limits:Arsenic (As) 0.03 percentBismuth (Bi) 0.01 percentAntimony (Sb) 0.01 percentLead (Pb) 0.3 percentZinc (Zn) 0.3 percentFluorine (F) 50 ppmChlorine (Cl) 0.005 percentMercury (Hg) 3 ppmNickel (Ni) + Cobalt (Co) 0.1 percentAlumina (Al203) 0.2 percentlf the parties agree to add additional impurities to the list set forthabove pursuant to paragraphs
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities.11.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Pengadilan PN DENPASAR Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 19-12-2014 — Putus : 24-08-2015 — Upload : 29-09-2015
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 915/Pdt.G/2014/PN.DPS.
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2015 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI melawan Perseroan Terbatas (PT) BALI RESORT & LEISURE (PT BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY),
128 — 91
  • The arbitrationpanel shall consist of three (3) arbitrators, one (1) chosen by thecomplainant, one (1) chosen by the respondent and a chairman chosen bythe arbitrators named by the complainant and the respondent.2 The Parties expressly agree that:a the arbitration tribunal shall decide the matter as expeditiously aspossible, and the arbitration shall be complete and the decision issued byHal 17 dari 80 halaman Putusan Perk.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 03-06-2015 — Putus : 11-05-2016 — Upload : 13-10-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 339/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 11 Mei 2016 — KZI SINGAPORE PTE.LTD, lawan 1. PT. ASURANSI RECAPITAL, 2. PT. PUTRA SAMUDRA (dalam pailit),
331 — 217
  • PENGGUGAT dan TURUTTERGUGAT, merupakan Perjanjian Pokok dan yang kemudian dijamin olehTERGUGAT dengan menerbitkan 2 (dua) jaminan berupa surety bond.Pertama, Advance Payment Bond pada tanggal 9 Juni 2012 dengan nomorHDO/BAPB/02/2012/00041 (Advance Payment Bond); Kedua,Performance Bond pada tanggal 28 Februari 2013 dengan nomorHDO/BPB/99/2013/00119, nilai Bond USD 3,600,000.00 (PerformanceBond).Bahwa pada Pasal 3 huruf c.i Perjanjian PENGGUGAT TURUTTERGUGAT, berbunyi sebagai berikut :The Parties agree
Pengadilan PN GUNUNG SUGIH Perdata
Register : 04-09-2018 — Putus : 17-07-2017 — Upload : 04-09-2018
Putusan PN GUNUNG SUGIH Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Gns
Tanggal 17 Juli 2017 — EDI HARIANTO PENGGUGAT I m e l a w a n I.PT. BUSSAN AUTO FINANCE
238 — 231
  • Putusan nomor3992/K/Pdt/1986 tanggal 25 September 1989 sekali lagi mempertimbangkanbahwa pengakuan utang dengan =memberikan jaminan atauacknowledgement of indebtness andsecurity agreement agree dipandangbukan sebagai grosse akte yang dimaksud dalam pasal 224 HIR.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Putus : 29-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 238 PK/Pdt/2014
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2014 — PT BERKAH KARYA BERSAMA, vs Ny. SITI HARDIYANTI RUKMANA,,dkk
3512 — 3107 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • pihak PT Asuransi Royal Indrapura vs Sohadi Kawilarang.Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum;Dalam Policy Nomor 49/00137/08, tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa alldifferences arising out of this Policy shall be reffered to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in diferrence or if they cannot agree
    PT Asuransi Royal Indrapura vs Sohadi Kawilarang;Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasan MahkamahAgung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkanhukum;Dalam Policy Nomor 49/00137/08, tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa alldifferences arising out of this Policy shall be reffered to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties indiferrence or if they cannot agree