Ditemukan 2114 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 30-12-2015 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2430 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 30 Desember 2015 — PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT DAN LEISURE (PT BALI RESORT DAN LEISURE CO., Ltd), Dkk vs ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI, pendiri PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BUAHAN
264211 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 2430 K/Pdt/2015the arbitration tribunal before any judicial authority in the Republicof Indonesia or elsewhere;(e) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity;14.3.
    Nomor 2430 K/Pdt/2015para pihak untuk bersidang, pemohon dalam Arbitrase SIAC diharuskanmenyebutkan perjanjian arbitrase, dan wajib melampirkan perjanjian yangmemuat klasula arbitrase, yang dikutip sebagai berikut:Rule 3: Notice of Arbitration;3.1,A party wishing to commence an arbitration (the "Claimant") shall filewith the Registrar a Notice of Arbitration which shall comprise:a. a demand that the dispute be referred to arbitration;b. ...
    ;c. a reference to the arbitration clause or the separate arbitrationagreement that is invoked and a copy of it;d. a reference to the contract out of or in relation to which the disputearises and where possible, a copy of it,Terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesia:Pasal 3: Permohonan Arbitrase;3.1.Pihak yang hendak memulai suatu arbitrase (Klaiman) wajibmendaftarkan Permohonan Arbitrase, yang memuat:a. Tuntutan mengenai perselisinannya dirujuk ke arbitrase;b. ...
    For that purpose, an arbitrationagreement which forms part of a contract shall be treated as anagreement independent of the other terms of the contract. A decisionby the Tribunal that the contract is null and void shall not entail ipsojure the invalidity of the arbitration agreement ;Terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesia:Pasal 25: Yurisdiksi Majelis;25.1.
    The Lease Agreement contains an agreement to arbitrate found inArticle 14 of the Lease Agreement, which provides as follows:Article 14;ARBITRATION;14.1.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 29-08-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT CNOOC SES Ltd vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
7550 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSCversi terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Hal ini dapatdilinat dari Tax Treaty Indonesia Inggris yang dalam Pasal 10 ayat (7)dan ayat (8) menyatakan:(7) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Agreement, where acompany which is a resident of a Contracting State, having apermanent establishment in the other Contracting State, derivesprofits through that permanent establishment, such profits may betaxed (in addition to the tax which would be chargeable on thoseprofits if they were the profits of a company which was a resident ofthat other
    Berikut adalah kutipan butir 5 Protoco/ Tax TreatyIndonesia Malaysia:In connection with Article 10 "Dividends", nothing in this Article shall affectthe provisions contained in any Production Sharing Contracts relating tothe exploitation and production of oil and natural gas which have beennegotiated with the Government of Indonesia or the relevant state oilcompany of Indonesia, provided that a company which is resident inMalaysia deriving income from a Production Sharing Contract shall not beless
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
    Disputes, if any, arising between PERTAMINA and CONTRACTORrelating to this Contract or the interpretation and performance of anyof the clauses of this Contract, and which cannot be settled amicably,shall be submitted to the decision of arbitration.....(Penambahan huruf tebal dari Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali);Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia menyatakan:BAGIAN XIKONSULTASI DAN ARBITRASEHalaman 58 dari 70 halaman. Putusan Nomor 1830/B/PK/PJK/201 726.1.1.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1829 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
252196 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by any tax treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Hal ini dapatdilinat dari Tax Treaty Indonesia Inggris yang dalam Pasal 10 ayat (7)dan ayat (8) menyatakan:(7) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Agreement, where acompany which is a resident of a Contracting State, having apermanent establishment in the other Contracting State, derivesprofits through that permanent establishment, such profits may betaxed (in addition to the tax which would be chargeable on thoseprofits if they were the profits of a company which was a resident ofthat other
    Berikut adalah kutipan butir 5 Protocol Tax TreatyIndonesia Malaysia:In connection with Article 10 "Dividends", nothing in this Article shall affectthe provisions contained in any Production Sharing Contracts relating tothe exploitation and production of oil and natural gas which have beennegotiated with the Government of Indonesia or the relevant state oilcompany of Indonesia, provided that a company which is resident inMalaysia deriving income from a Production Sharing Contract shall not beless
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
    Disputes, if any, arising between PERTAMINA and CONTRACTORrelating to this Contract or the interpretation and performance of anyof the clauses of this Contract, and which cannot be settled amicably,shall be submitted to the decision of arbitration.....(Penambahan huruf tebal dari Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali);Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia menyatakan:BAGIAN XIKONSULTASI DAN ARBITRASE1.1.
Putus : 26-04-2011 — Upload : 21-09-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1517 K/Pdt/2009
Tanggal 26 April 2011 — SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED;SIGIT SUCIPTOYONO
782893 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 1517 K/Pdt/2009"An action for damages must be brought, at the option of the plaintiff, in theterritory of one of the High Contracting Parties, either before the Court of thedomicile of the carrier or his principal place of business, or where he has aplace of business through which the contract has been made, or beforethe Court at the place of destination".Terjemahan bebasnya :"Suatu tuntutan untuk penggantian kerugian harus diajukan, berdasarkanopsi dari Penggugat, di wilayah dari satu pihak
    An action for damages must be brought, at the option the plaintiff, inthe territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, either before the courthaving jurisdiction where the carrier is ordinarily resident, or has hisproncipal place of business, or has an establishment by which thecontract has been made or before the Court having jurisdiction at theplace of destination;Terjemahannya:1. Suatu tuntutan ganti kerugian harus atas opsi pihak yang inginHal. 8 dari 29 hal. Put.
    Dengandemikian, jelaslah bahwa Konvensi Warsawa merupakan hukum yangmengatur dalam perkara a quo ;13.Pasal 29 (1) Konvensi Warsawa rnenyebutkan bahwa :The right to damages shall be extinguished if an action is not broughtwithin two years, reckoned from the date of arrival at the destination, orfrom the date on which the aircraft ought to have. arrived, or from thedate on which the carriage stoppea" ;Terjemahannya:"Hak atas ganti kerugian batal. dengan. sendirinya apabila suatu tuntutantidak diajukan
Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1524 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. CHARABOT SA;
3518 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • harus dipenuhi agar Indonesia dalamhal ini dapat mengenakan pajak, Pemohon Banding dalam halini walau memiliki kehadiran yang permanen, namun tidakmenjalankan usaha di tempatnya tersebut;Bahwa pada Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf e dari P3B IndonesiaPerancis, dinyatakan bahwa "the term permanent establishmentshall not be deemed to include: ...the maintenance of a fixedplace of business solely for the purpose of advertising, for thesupply of information, for scientific research, or for similaractivities which
    Hal ini sudah dengan amatjelas diatur di P3B, dan Pemohon Banding sudah amat jelasmemenuhi ketentuan bahwa kantor di Indonesia bukanlah BUT.Kegiatan usaha dilakukan langsung oleh kantor pusat, danpenghasilan juga diterima langsung oleh kantor pusat;Bahwa Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis menyebutkanbahwa "for the purposes of this convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on";Bahwa hal ini
    aleorgene coon caacnd, baecieea cernfaatrad wend Kore hector airteniarenmy is rr ue ranigh ofawse: ware hospiFotis 62a Pek Sore far bores purserAE ie eee lp dionaura eaccrecm Bahwa dari Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf (e) dari perjanjian pajak bergandatersebut tegas dinyatakan:The term "permanent establishment" shall not be deemed to include:(e) The maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for thepurpose of advertising, for the suppiy of Information, forscientific research or for similar activities which
    Putusan Nomor 1524/B/PK/PJK/2017tetapi hanya sekedar kegiatan riset pemasaran produkprodukKantor Pusatnya;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis,dijelaskan sebagai berikut:"For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Untuk tujuan Persetujuan ini, istilah "tempat usaha tetap" berartisuatu tempat usaha tertentu dimana seluruh atau sebagian usahaperusahaan
    Bahwa hal tersebut juga ditegaskan dalamCommentary OECD Model Tax Convention atasParagraf 4 article 5 yang menyebutkan:This paragraph lists a number of businessactivities which are treated as exceptions to thegeneral definition laid down in paragraph 1 andwhich are not permanent establishments, even ifthe activity is carried on through a fixed place ofbusiness. The common feature of these activitiesis that they are, in general, preparatory or auxiliaryactivities;3.6.4.
Register : 16-06-2011 — Putus : 19-08-2013 — Upload : 05-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put. 46602/PP/M.X/99/2013
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2013 — Penggugat dan Tergugat
18866
  • PeraturanPajak II Nomor: S794/PJ.033/2011 tanggal 13 Mei 2011 ditujukan kepada Director ofInternational Cooperation Division Competent Authority of Singapore;bahwa dalam Surat Direktur Peraturan Pajak II Nomor: S794/PJ.033/2011 tanggal 13 Mei2011 ditujukan kepada Director of International Cooperation Division Competent Authority ofSingapore, disebutkan bahwa:We are pleased to acknowledge the receipt of your fetter, ref: B/49/MAP/PFI Vol. 1 dated 13April 2011, regarding the request for MAP application which
    Surat dari Inland Revenue of Singapore Nomor: B/49/MAP/PFI Vol.1 tanggal 13 April2011;bahwa dalam Surat Direktur Peraturan Pajak II Nomor: S794/PJ.033/2011 tanggal 13 Mei2011 ditujukan kepada Director of International Cooperation Division Competent Authority ofSingapore, disebutkan bahwa:We are pleased to acknowledge the receipt of your fetter, ref: B/49/MAP/PFI Vol. 1 dated 13April 2011, regarding the request for MAP application which was lodged by PetraFoods Limited (PFL), a tax resident of Singapore
    The information disclosed in this letter is furnished under the Singapore Indonesia DTA, which limits its use and disclosure.bahwa Penggugat menyampaikan tambahan penjelasan dengan Surat Nomor: XXX 08/II/2012tanggal 9 Pebruari 2012 yang pada pokoknya mengemukakan:L.
Putus : 13-01-2016 — Upload : 18-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 985/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 13 Januari 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2413 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memenuhi syarat kKedua karena pembuatannya dengancara injection moulding, karena untuk masuk Pos 64.02 harusmemenuhi syarat pembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling,dipaku, disekrup, ditusuk atau dengan cara semacam itu;Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition, Volume 3, dinyatakan: The Headingcovers, inter alia:(9g) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivetsor similar devices;(h) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    areproduced in one piece usually attached to the base or platformby riveting;(i) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter, the uppers ofwhich, being produced in one piece or assembledother than by stitching, are attached to the sole by stitching;(i) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(k) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the soleby plugs which lock into holes in the sole;(1) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Putus : 16-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 502/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 16 Juni 2016 — CV. Pujima Goarna vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2311 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memenuhi syarat kedua karena pembuatannya dengan carainjection moulding, karena untuk masuk pos 64.02 harus memenuhisyarat pembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup,ditusuk atau dengan cara semacam itu.Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : The Headingcovers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivets orsimilar devices;(6b) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    are producedin one piece usually attached to the base or platform by riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers of which,being produced in one piece or assembled other than by stitching,are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the soleby plugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Register : 21-07-2017 — Putus : 15-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1519 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 15 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
7564 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixed placeof business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, in general,prepatory or auxilary Activities;Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory orauxilaiary character and those which have not.
    Putusan Nomor 1519/B/PK/PJK/201 7Pasal 5 ayat (1):For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2):List of PE positive definition:Sor re W =Place of Management;Branch;Office;Factory;Workshop;Mine, oil or gas well, quarry or any other place of extraction ofnatural Resources;Pasal 5 ayat (4):Tempat Usaha yang dikecualikan sebagai BUT/PESuatu tempat usaha tidak
Register : 11-02-2019 — Putus : 25-04-2019 — Upload : 09-12-2019
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 73/PDT/2019/PT BDG
Tanggal 25 April 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : Hilton Hotel Bandung
Terbanding/Penggugat : Ivan Chrisna
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : Wedding Organizer Testimo
224171
  • Sebab segalaperselisihan yang timbul dari Conference & Event Agreement NoContract WRIGA 100318 tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017 (selanjutnyadisebut SURAT PERJANJIAN) di selesaikan melalui Arbitrase dan dalamhal ini yang berwenang adalah Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesiacabang Bandung sebagaimana Pasal 20 ayat 2 Surat Perjanjian yangmenyatakan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration
    of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui arbitrase sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi.Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Penggugat maupun Tergugat ,jikalaupun Pasal 20 ayat 2
    Bahwa Majelis Hakim PN Bandung secara nyata telah melampauikewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara aquo.Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 20 ayat (2) PerjanjianConference and Event Agreement No Contract: WRIGA 100318tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017, menyebutkan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotellocated under the Rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement wil
    the hotel islocated under the rules of arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotelis located.Bahwa apabila Pembanding/ semula Penggugat Rekonpensimengajukan Gugatan Wanprestasi yang merupakan Gugatanperselisihan yang timbul akibat dari pelaksanaan suatu perjanjian,maka seharusnya dilakukan secara terpisah dengan perkara ini dantidak diajukan bersamasama dengan Perkara ini
    the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui ARBITRASE sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi ;Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Pembanding
Register : 15-09-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42594/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11633
  • In exceptional cases where the Certificate of Origin (Form E) has not beenissued by the time of shipment or no later than three (3) days from the date ofshipment, at the request of the exporter, the Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall beissued retroactively in accordance with the domestic laws, regulations andadministrative rules of the exporting Party within twelve (12) months from the date ofshipment, in which case it is necessary fo indicate ISSUED RETROACTIVELY?
Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1526 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. CHARABOT SA;
5034 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • harus dipenuhi agar Indonesia dalamhal ini dapat mengenakan pajak, Pemohon Banding dalam halini walau memiliki kehadiran yang permanen, namun tidakmenjalankan usaha di tempatnya tersebut;Bahwa pada Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf e dari P3B IndonesiaPerancis, dinyatakan bahwa "the term permanent establishmentshall not be deemed to include: ...the maintenance of a fixedplace of business solely for the purpose of advertising, for thesupply of information, for scientific research, or for similaractivities which
    Hal ini sudah dengan amatjelas diatur di P3B, dan Pemohon Banding sudah amat jelasmemenuhi ketentuan bahwa kantor di Indonesia bukanlah BUT.Kegiatan usaha dilakukan langsung oleh kantor pusat, danpenghasilan juga diterima langsung oleh kantor pusat;Bahwa Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis menyebutkanbahwa "for the purposes of this convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on";Bahwa hal ini
    dari struktur organisasi tersebut terlihat bahwa kantorperwakilan (representative office) CHARABOT SA yang ada diIndonesia tersebut tidak melakukan kegiatan usaha seperti usahauntuk produksi, usaha penjualan/perdagangan (ekspor/impor)tetapi hanya sekedar kegiatan riset pemasaran produkprodukKantor Pusatnya;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B IndonesiaPerancis,dijelaskan sebagai berikut:"For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which
    kegiatanusaha yang berorientasi profit dan hanya sekedar kegiatan risetpemasaran produkproduk Kantor Pusatnya saja;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (2) P3B IndonesiaPerancis,disebutkan bahwa:"The term "permanent establishment" shall include especially :(a) a place of management", (b) a branch, (c) an office, (d) afactory, (e) a workshop, (f) a farm or plantation, (g) a mine, an oilwell, quarry or other place of extraction of natural resources, (h)abuilding site or construction or assembly project which
    Putusan Nomor 1526 B/PK/PJK/2017Permanent Establishment adalah kegiatan yang bersifatpersiapanataupenunjang (preparatory or auxiliary)untuk kepentingan penduduk dan bukan kepentinganpihak lain; Bahwa hal tersebut juga ditegaskan dalam CommentaryOECD Model Tax Convention atas Paragraf 4 article 5yang menyebutkan:"This paragraph lists a number of business activitieswhich are treated as exceptions to the general definitionlaid down in paragraph 1 and which are not permanentestablishments, even if the
Register : 12-07-2011 — Putus : 27-02-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-43581/PP/M.XVII/19/2013
Tanggal 27 Februari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12731
  • The classification of certain motor vehicles in this heading is determined by certainfeatures which indicate that the vehicles are designed for the transport of goods ratherthan for the transport of persons (heading 87.03)...";iii. Berdasarkan WCO Commodity Data Base, "motor vehicles for the transport of goods,with diesel or semidiesel engine and with a gross vehicle weight exceeding 20 tonnes"dimasukkan subpos 8704.23;iv.
    A typical dump truck is equipped with ahydraulicallyoperated openbox bed hinged at the rear, the front of which can be lifted up to allow thecontents to be deposited or) the ground behind the truck at the site of delivery.
    Berdasarkan EN to the HS Vol.5 fourth edition (2007) hal XVI87041 dijelaskan bahwa:The classification of certain motor vehicles in this heading is determined by certainfeatures which indicate that the vehicles are designed for the transport of goods ratherthan for the transport of persons (heading 87.03).d. Berdasarkan WCO Commodity data base, motor vehicles for the transport of goods, withdiesel or semidiesel engine and with a gross vehicle weight exceeding 20 tonnesdimasukkan subpos 8704.23e.
Putus : 29-10-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 651/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT LINCOLN ELECTRIC INDONESIA
5936 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Normally, distributions by a companywhich have the effect of reducing the membership rights, for instance,payments constituting a reimbursement of capital in any formwhatever, are not regarded as dividends;Paragraf 29;The benefits to which a holding in a company confer entitlement are,as a general rule, available solely to the shareholders themselves;Should, however, certain of such benefits be made available topersons who are not shareholders within the meaning of company law,they may constitute
    The reliefs provided in the Articleapply so long as the State of which the paying company is aresident taxes such benefits as dividends. It is immaterial whetherany such benefits are paid out of current profits made by thecompany or are derived, for example, from reserves, .e. profits ofprevious financial years.
    companywhich have the effect of reducing the membership rights, forinstance, payments constituting a reimbursement of capital in anyform whatever, are not regarded as dividends;(Suatu pembayaran disebut sebagai ddividen termasuk tidakhanya distribusi laba yang diputuskan dalam Rapat UmumPemegang Saham, tetapi juga manfaat/ keuntungan lain baikberupa uang atau bernilai uang, misalnya pembagian sahambonus, bonus,keuntungan dari likuidasi dan distribusi laba secaraterselubung);Paragraf 29;The benefits to which
Putus : 01-01-1970 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 946/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 1 Januari 1970 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK, VS PT COCA COLA INDONESIA
3103124 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Where a resident of one of the Contracting States and anyother person are related and where such related personsmake arrangements or impose conditions betweenthemselves which are different from those which would bemade between independent persons, any income,deductions, credits, or allowances which would, but forthose arrangements or conditions, have been taken intoaccount in computing the income (or loss) of, or the taxpayable by, one of such persons, may be taken into accountin computing the amount
    Where a Contracting State includes in the profits of aresident of that State, and taxes accordingly, profits onwhich a resident of the other Contracting State has beencharged to tax in that other State, and the profits so includedare profits which would have accrued to the resident of thefirstmentioned State if the conditions made between the tworesidents had been those which would have been madebetween independent persons, then that other State shallmake an appropriate adjustment to the amount of
    Theissue is whether the marketer should be compensated asa service provider, .e. for providing promotional services,or whether there are any cases in which the marketershould share in any additional return attributable to themarketing intangibles.
    In that case, the distributorwould be entitled to compensation appropriate to itsagency activities alone and would not be entitled to sharein any return attributable to the marketing intangible.Where the distributor actually bears the cost of itsmarketing activities (i.e. there is no arrangement for theowner to reimburse the expenditures), the issue is theextent to which the distributor is able to share in thepotential benefits from those activities.
Register : 10-01-2017 — Putus : 13-03-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 184 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 13 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. FREEPORT INDONESIA;
6647 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Paragraph 1.6 dan 1.7 OECD TPGuidelines;Paragraph 1.6 OECD TP GuidelinesWhere conditions are made orimposed between the two associatedenterprises in their commercial orfinancial relations which differ fromthose which would be made betweenindependent enterprises, then anyprofits which would, but for thoseconditions, have accrued to one of theenterprises, but, by reason of thoseconditions, have not so accrued, maybe included in the profits of thatenterprise and taxed accordingly.Paragraph 1.7 OECD
    In any event sales.commitments with Affiliates shall be made only at pricesbased on or equivalent to arm's length: sales and in' accordance with such terms and conditions at which suchagreement would be made if the parties. had not. beenAffiliates, with due allowance for normal selling Pasal 11 butir 2 Kontrak Karya; The Company shall sell the Products in accordance with.generally accepted international business practices, anduse its best efforts to do so at prices and on terms ofsale which will
    maximize the economic return from theoperations hereunder, giving effect to world marketconditions and other circumtances prevailing at the timeof sale or contract; provided that the Government shallhave the right, en a basis which is of generalapplicability and nondiscriminatery as to the Company,to prohibit the sale or export of Minerals or Froductsif such sale or export would be cantrary to theinternational obligations of the Government or to Bahwa Kontrak Karya tidak mengaturmasalah materialitas
    In any event sales.commitments with Affiliates shall be made only at pricesbased on or equivalent to arm's length: sales and in" accordance with such terms and conditions at which suchagreenent would be made if the parties had not. beenAffiliates, with due allowance for, normal selling Pasal 11 butir 7 Kontrak Karya In the event of a sale of copper concentrates, gald orsilver to an Affiliate or to the domestic market or toathe Government's designated agency, it is understoodthat, unless otherwise
    agreed by the Parties, the priceef strech Products shall be determined on the basis of aformula price which cis*generally employed in the sale ot comparable products among unrelated parties.
Register : 02-11-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42591/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12331
  • In exceptional cases where the Certificate of Origin (Form E) has not beenissued by the time of shipment or no later than three (3) days from the date ofshipment, at the request of the exporter, the Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall beissued retroactively in accordance with the domestic laws, regulations andadministrative rules of the exporting Party within twelve (12) months from the date ofshipment, in which case it is necessary fo indicate ISSUED RETROACTIVELY?
Register : 04-08-2017 — Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1527 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
5133 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixedplace of business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, ingeneral, prepatory or auxilary activities.Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory or auxilaiarycharacter and those which have not.
    Jikaperusahaan menjalankan usahanya seperti yang dikatakansebelumnya, laba dari perusahaan itu bisa dikenakan pajak di Negaralain itu, tetapi hanya mengenai bagian laba yang dianggap berasaldari pendirian tetap tersebut.OECD MODEL 2008Pasal 5 ayat (1)For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2)List of PEpositive definition:Place of managementBranchOfficeFactoryWorkshopor
Register : 21-10-2016 — Putus : 23-11-2017 — Upload : 28-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 23 Nopember 2017 — Arfan Syafril, Lawan NSB Niderelbe Schiffahrtsgesselschaft MbH & Co.KG,
494530
  • Pengadilan).Bahwa Permohonan PenetapanPengadilan telah dikabulkan oleh PNJaksel dengan dikeluarkannyaPenetapan No. 203 /Pdt.P /2016/PN.JKT.Sel. tertanggal 14September 2016 (Penetapan PNJaksel No. 203/2016).Bahwa Pihak KetigamengatasnamakandenganPerseroanregistered at the Registrar of SouthJakarta District Court under caseregister number746/Padt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel (theCompany), in this matter the ThirdParty and the Company arerepresented by Hendy RizkiHasibuan based on Specific Powerof Attorney which
    dapatditarik kembali untukmengesampingkan, menarik, danmembatalkan setiap dan semuatuduhan, tudingan, perselisihan,perbedaan dan/atau klaim, langsungatau tidak langsung yang dibuat,sehubungan dengan setiap perilaku,pernyataan, tindakan, dugaangangguan, pelanggaran ataukelalaian di antara Para Pihakberkaitan dengan Perseroan, PerkaraPerlawanan atau hubungan komersialdan hukum lainnya di antara ParaPihak.PASAL 2PELAKSANAAN PERDAMAIAN(1) Perseroan bersamasama denganPihak Pertama akan mengajukanopposition which
    is basicallyintended so that the PN Jakselwould cancel PN Jaksel StipulationNo. 203/2016, which is registered atRegistrar of the South JakartaDisitrict Court registered under casenumber 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel dated 21October 2016 (the OppositionCase) between the Company (asChallenger) and dengan First Party(as Challengee), and at the time thisAgreement is drawn up, theexamination of the Opposition Caseat PN Jaksel is still ongoing.5.
Register : 11-01-2016 — Putus : 17-03-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 47 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 17 Maret 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SEBANGUN BUMI ANDALAS WOOD INDUSTRIES;
3921 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, such interst may also be taxed in the State in which itarises according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficialowner of the interst is a resident of the other State, the tax socharged shall not exceed 10 percent of the gross amount of theinterest;bahwa Terjemahan Pasal 11 tersebut adalah sebagai berikut :a. Bunga yang timbul di salah satu Negara dan dibayarkan kepadapenduduk Negara lainnya dapat dikenakan pajak di Negaralainnya;b.
    pajak.Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B) antara Pemerintahrepublik Indonesia dengan pemerintah Kerajaan Belanda, antara lainmengatur sebagai berikut:Article 11 (1):Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident of theother State may be taxed in that other State.Pasal 11 ayat (1):Bunga yang timbul di salah satu Negara dan dibayarkan kepadapenduduk Negara lainnya dapat dikenakan pajak di Negara lainnya.Article 11 (2):However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which
    However, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, such interestmay also be tmed in the Contracting State ini which it arises andaccording to the law of that state, but if the recipient is thebeneficial owner of the interest the tax so charged shall not exceed10 per cent of the goss amount of the interest.Bahwa huruf a, mengatur bahwa tempat kedudukan penerimapenghasilan bunga (negara domisili) dapat mengenakan pajak ataspenghasilan bunga tersebut.
    /ncidently, insuch cases, the factual circumstance of each individual case are ofcrucial importance,which make it difficult to provide more precisedescription. the meaning of the term "benefical owner" in international tax lawis strongly determined by factual cirmstances. It is therefore notpossible to give further meaning to this term in a general manner.Recommendations in this area therefore completely lacking in theOECD model convention.Halaman 28 dari 35 halaman.