Ditemukan 2114 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 26-07-2012 — Putus : 02-05-2013 — Upload : 12-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.44839/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 2 Mei 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
10721
  • harusdiklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.Bahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut: 64.01proses semacam itu. 6401.10.00.00Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luar danbagian atas dari karet atau dari plastik,bagian atasnya tidak dipasang pada soldan tidak dirakit dengan cara dijahit,dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusuk atauAlas kaki dilengkapilogam pelindung jariWaterproof footwear with outer soles anduppers of rubber or of plastics, the uppersof which
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 14-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 282 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
6637 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • a member ofa diplomatic or consular mission of one of the two States in the otherState or in a third State and who is a national of the sending State, shallbe deemed to be a resident of the sending State if he is submittedtherein to the same obligations in respect of taxes on income as areresidents of that State;Article 111.Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident of theother State may be taxed in that other State.However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which
    For these reasons, the report from the Committee onFiscal Affairs entitled "Double Taxation Conventions and the Use ofConduit Companies" concludes that a conduit company cannotnormally be regarded as the beneficial owner if; though the formalowner, it has, as a practical matter, very narrow powers which renderit, in relation to the income concerned, a mere fiduciary oradministrator acting on account of the interested parties."15..2 Dalam buku berjudul "Beneficial Ownership of Royalties in BilateralTax
    Putusan Nomor 282/B/PK/PJK/2013berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yang dijatuhkanmerupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembangan hukum (lawdevelopment), sehingga pada hakekatnya, perkara yang diputusberdasarkan yurisprudensi berkaitan erat dengan perubahan sosial (sosialchange) dan kondisi ekonomi (economic condition).
Register : 09-09-2009 — Putus : 29-04-2013 — Upload : 08-11-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.44768/PP/M.XII/15/2013
Tanggal 29 April 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
178129
  • The benefits of this Convention shall not apply to income which may, in accordance with the othof the Convention, be taxed in a Contracting State and which is derived from activities the petwhich do not require substantial presence in that State, including:a) such activities involving banking, shipping, financing, insurance or electronic commerce activitb) activities involving headquarter or coordination centre or similar arrangements providing compadministration, financing or other support; orc)
    activities which give rise to passive income, such as dividends, interest and royaltiesbahwa Pasal 4 ayat (3) huruf f UU PPh menyatakan bahwa: "Yang tidak termasuk sebagai Objek Pajak adalah:f. dividen atau bagian laba yang diterima atau diperoleh perseroan terbatas sebagai Wajib Pajak dkoperasi, Badan Usaha Milik Negara, atau Badan Usaha Milk Daerah, dari penyertaan modalusaha yang didirikan dan bedempat kedudukan di Indonesia dengan syarat :1) dividen berasal dari cadangan laba yang ditahan; dan2
Register : 25-10-2012 — Putus : 25-06-2013 — Upload : 24-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 660 B/PK/PJK/2012
Tanggal 25 Juni 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PINDO DELI PULP AND PAPER MILLS;
4122 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • "However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which it arisesand according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of theinterest is a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall notexceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest."3.
    For these reasons, the report from theCommittee on Fiscal Affairs entitled "Double TaxationConventions and the Use of Conduit Companies" concludes thata conduit company cannot normally be regarded as the beneficialomer if; though the formal owner, it has, as a practical matter,very narrow povers which render it, in relation to the incomeconcerned, a mere fiduciary or administrator acting on account ofthe interested parties."14.2.
    Yahya HarahapSH , Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktiandan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam /Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yang dijatuhkanmerupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembangan hukum (/awdevelopment), sehingga pada hakekatnya
Register : 26-07-2012 — Putus : 02-05-2013 — Upload : 12-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-44837/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 2 Mei 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
10223
  • itu.Pos 64.01 tidak mempertimbangkan apakah bagian upper berlubang atau tidak, asalkan AlasKaki dimaksud memenuhi kriteria dimaksud butir 6.1 di atas, harus diklasifikasi pada Pos64.01.7. bahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif Kepabeanan IndonesiaTahun 2012, sebagai berikut : 64.01 Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luar dan bagian atas Waterproof footwear with outer soles and uppers ofdari karet atau dari plastik, bagian atasnya tidak rubber or of plastics, the uppers of which
Putus : 08-05-2019 — Upload : 30-10-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1252 B/PK/PJK/2019
Tanggal 8 Mei 2019 — BUT FORTUNA RESOURCES (SUNDA) LIMITED VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
7052 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • timbulnya hak dan kewajiban yangmelekat dari perjanjian yang berasal dari kegiatan business profit,yang sudah barang tentu mempunyai yuridiksi dan tunduk padaregulasi konvensi internasional, Keempat, in casu branch profit tax,memiliki keterkaitan hubungan hukum (innerlijkke samenhang) antaraKontrak Bagi Hasil (production sharing contract) dengan P3BIndonesiaInggris sebagaimana yang dimuat dalam Article 10.7 yangmenyatakan bahwa: Notwithstanding any other provisions of thisAgreement, where a company which
Putus : 29-10-2018 — Upload : 19-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2755 B/PK/PJK/2018
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2018 — BUT FORTUNA RESOURCES (SUNDA) LIMITED VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
5429 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 2755/B/PK/Pjk/2018Bagi Hasil (Production Sharing Contract) dengan P3B Indonesia Inggrissebagaimana yang dimuat dalam Article 10.7 yang menyatakan bahwa :Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, where acompany which is a resident of one of the two States has a permanentestablishment in the other State, the profits of the permanentestablishment may be subjected to an additional tax in that other State inaccordance with its law, but the additional tax so charged shall notexceed
Register : 01-08-2013 — Putus : 15-07-2014 — Upload : 29-06-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.54083/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 15 Juli 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12425
  • ofthat Party, provided that that Party has the rights to exploit such waters, seabed and beneath theseabed in accordance with international law;Products of sea fishing and other marine products taken from the high seas by vessels registeredwith a Party or entitled to fly the flag of that Party;Products processed and/or made on board factory ships registered with a Party or entitled to flythe flag of that Party, exclusively from products referred to in paragraph (g) above;Articles collected there which
Register : 21-10-2013 — Putus : 14-10-2014 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.56115/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
14319
  • of thatParty, provided that that Party has the rights to exploit such waters, seabed and beneath the seabedin accordance with international law,Products of sea fishing and other marine products taken from the high seas by vessels registeredwith a Party or entitled to fly the flag of that Party,Products processed and/or made on board factory ships registered with a Party or entitled to fly theflag of that Party, exclusively from products referred to in paragraph (g) above,Articles collected there which
Putus : 11-07-2019 — Upload : 18-10-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2034/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 11 Juli 2019 — BUT NATUNA 1 B.V vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
12563 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • timbulnya hak dan kewajiban yang melekat dari perjanjian yangberasal dari kegiatan business profit, yang sudah barangtentumempunyai yuridiksi dan tunduk pada regulasi konvensi internasional.Keempat, in casu Branch Profit Tax, memiliki keterkaitan hubunganhukum (innerlijkke samenhang) antara Kontrak Bagi Hasil (ProductionSharing Contract) dengan P3B Indonesia Belanda sebagaimana yangdimuat dalam Article 10.8 yang menyatakan bahwa: Notwithstandingany other provisions of this Agreement, where a company which
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 14-08-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 281/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA,
5237 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • amember of a diplomatic or consular mission of one of the twoStates in the other State or in a third State and who is a nationalof the sending State, shall be deemed to be a resident of thesending State if he is submitted therein to the same obligations inrespect of taxes on income as are residents of that State;Article 111 Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident of the otherState may be taxed in that other State.2 However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which
    orexemption where a resident of a Contracting State, otherwise thanthrough an agency or nominee relationship, simply acts as a conduit foranother person who in fact receives the benefit of the income concerned.For these reasons, the report from the Committee on Fiscal Affairsentitled "Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of ConduitCompanies" concludes that a conduit company cannot normally beregarded as the beneficial owner if; though the formal owner, it has, asa practical matter, very narrow powers which
    Yahya HarahapSH, Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktiandan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason, berupaprinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (the principle oflaw which the decision is based), dan putusan yang dijatuhkan merupakankasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembangan hukum (law development),sehingga pada hakekatnya
Putus : 30-01-2019 — Upload : 01-02-2019
Putusan PT DENPASAR Nomor 192/Pdt/2018/PT DPS
Tanggal 30 Januari 2019 — AMALIA REGINA KANDOU melawan NEIL PATRICK POWER, dkk
380260
  • Bahwa untuk menanggapi di Poin 3.a Memori Banding Pembanding,TerbandingI/dahulu Tergugat I dalam Konvensi/Penggugat dalamRekonvensi dalam penawaran yang diberikannya (offer to purchase)sudah mengakui sebagaimana Pasal 6 dalam "Offer ofPurchasetanggal 12 Mei 2016 yang berbunyi "JZ confirm that I amaware that PT Xclusive Property are acting as agents on behalfof the Owner and that property is sold as seen including allfurniture and accessories which were displayed on 11 May 2016.A list of the Inventory
    Bahwa untuk menanggapi di Poin 3.a Memori Banding Pembanding,Terbanding II/dahulu Tergugat II dalam Konvensi/Penggugat dalamRekonvensi dalam penawaran yang diberikannya (offer to purchase)sudah mengakui sebagaimana Pasal 6 dalam "Offer of Purchasetanggal 12 Mei 2016 yang berbunyi "J confirm that I am aware thatPT Xclusive Property are acting as agents on behalf of the Ownerand that property is sold as seen including all furniture andaccessories which were displayed on 11 May 2016.
    Bahwa untuk menanggapi di Poin 3.a Memori Banding Pembanding,TerbandingIII/dahulu Tergugat III dalam Konvensi/Penggugat dalamRekonvensi dalam penawaran yang diberikannya (offer to purchase)sudah mengakui sebagaimana Pasal 6 dalam "Offer of Purchasetanggal 12 Mei 2016 yang berbunyi "J confirm that I am aware thatPT Xclusive Property are acting as agents on behalf of the Ownerand that property is sold as seen including all furniture andaccessories which were displayed on 11 May 2016.
Putus : 10-07-2019 — Upload : 30-10-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1992/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 10 Juli 2019 — BUT NATUNA UK (KAKAP 2) LIMITED VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
7748 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1992/B/PK/Pjk/2019company which is a resident of one of the two States has a permanentestablishment in the other State, the profits of the permanentestablishment may be subjected to an additional tax in that other Statein accordance with its law, but the additional tax so charged shall notexceed 10 per cent of the amount of such profits after deductingtherefrom income tax and other taxes on income imposed thereon in thatother State,Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:(Terlepas dari ketentuanketentuan
Register : 23-08-2019 — Putus : 29-10-2019 — Upload : 12-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3392 B/PK/PJK/2019
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2019 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. TH INDO PLANTATIONS;
206120 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In furtherance thereto,the Issuer is desirous of issuing to THII, and THII is desirous ofsubscibbing in the Issuer, the Serie A Shares (as defined herein), inconsideration of which THII shall setoff the Indebtedness. D. The Issueris hereby acknowledged, based on the Articles (as definded herein), tohave issued Ordinary Shares (as defined herein).
Register : 23-02-2017 — Putus : 29-03-2017 — Upload : 02-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 392 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 29 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. INTERNATIONAL MATARI ADVERTISING;
3415 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Dollars ($236,000,000), which will be provided in increments.Subsequent increments will be subject to the availability of funds toUSAID for this purpose and the mutual agreement of the Parties, at thetime of each subsequent increment, to proceed. Section 4 of Annex 2Assistance under the SOAG is free from any taxes in Indonesia.
    Bahwa berdasarkan USAID Grant Agreement No. 497019:Article 4 : Completion Date SOAG:(a) The Completion Date, which is September 30, 2008, orsuch other date as the two Parties may agree to in writing,is the date by which the two Parties estimate that all theactivities necessary to achieve the Objective and Resultswill be completed"(b) Except as USAID may otherwise agree to in writing,USAID will not assue or approve documentation wichwould authorize disbursement of the grant for servicesperformed or
Register : 10-01-2017 — Putus : 13-03-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 187 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 13 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. FREEPORT INDONESIA;
5933 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In any event sales. commitments with Affiliates shall be mad2 only at pricesbased on or equivalent to arms length: sales and inaccordance with such terms and conditions at which suchagreement would be made if the parties. had not, beenAttiliates, with due allowance for normal selling Kentuan ini jelas mengatur bahwa setiapperjanjian penjualan dengan afiliasi hanyadilaksanakan berdasarkan pada harga atausama dengan penjualan arm's length sales"dan sesuai dengan persyaratanpersyaratandan kondisikondisi
    Paragraph 1.6 dan 1.7 OECD TPGuidelines;Paragraph 1.6 OECD TP GuidelinesWhere conditions are made or imposedbetween the two associated enterprises intheir commercial or financial relations whichdiffer from those which would be madebetween independent enterprises, then anyprofits which would, but for those conditions,have accrued to one of the enterprises, but,by reason of those conditions, have not soaccrued, may be included in the profits ofthat enterprise and taxed accordingly.Paragraph 1.7 OECD
    In any event sales.commitments with Affiliates shall be made only at pricesbased on or equivalent to arm's length sales and in" accordance with such terms and conditions at which suchagreement would be made if the parties. had not, beenAffiliates, with due allowance for normal selling Pasal 11 butir 2 Kontrak KaryaThe Company shall sell the Preducts in accordance with.generally accepted international business practices, anduse its best efforts to do so at prices and on terms otsale which will maximize
    the economic return from theoperations hereunder, giving effect to world marketconditions and other circumtances prevailing at the timeof sale or contract; provided that the Government shallhave the raight, on a basis which is of generalapplicability and mendiscriminatery as ta the Company,to prohibit the sale or export of Minerals or Productsif such sale or export would be cantrary to the international ebligations eT the Government or to Kontrak Karya tidak mengatur masalahmaterialitas dan sesuai
    by the Farties, the priceef such Products shall be determined on the basis of 4formula price which is"generally employed in the sale otcemparable products among unrelated parties.
Putus : 26-07-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2372 K/Pdt/2012
Tanggal 26 Juli 2013 — YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN PELITA HARAPAN Cq SEKOLAH PELITA HARAPAN, dkk vs. CAROLINE SAPUTAN
18464 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Grade 6 requires a weekly signature from a parent.Parenth are encouraged to review the agendas, which list home workassignments, test dates, scheduling need such as PE, ensemble andspecial events.
    Parenth are encouragedto review the agendas, which list home work assignments, testdates, scheduling need such as PE, ensemble and special events.Teachers may request that agendas need to be signed andchecked by parents if the student is consistenly not completinghome work (Junior School, ParenStudent Handbook, tentangAgenda, halaman 8, 2010/2011) Selanjutnya dapat dijelaskan juga bahwa Pembanding V dan VIdalam hal tertentu tidak menggunakan buku agenda karena sayalinat tidak efektif.
    Grade 6 requires a weekly signature from a parent.Parenth are encouraged to review the agendas, which list home workassignments, test dates, scheduling need such as PE, ensemble andspecial events. Teachers may request that agendas need to be signedand checked by parents if the student is consistenly not completing homework (Junior School, ParentStudent Handbook, tentang Agenda,halaman 8, 2010/2011);38.Bahwa selanjutnya Judex Facti telah tidak seksama menilai bukti P3,Bukti P8, Bukti P9.
Register : 17-07-2014 — Putus : 11-12-2014 — Upload : 11-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 50 P/HUM/2014
Tanggal 11 Desember 2014 — PERKUMPULAN FORUM ZAKAT JAKARTA, DKK VS PRESIDEN RI;
15583 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom tohave or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only tosuch limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protectHalaman 17 dari 31 halaman. Putusan Nomor 50 P/HUM/2014public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights andfreedoms of others.4.
    The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right towork, which includes the right of everyone to the opportunity to gainhis living by work which he freely chooses or accepts, and will takeappropriate steps to safeguard this right.2.
Register : 16-10-2013 — Putus : 14-10-2014 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.56119/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
20213
  • of thatParty, provided that that Party has the rights to exploit such waters, seabed and beneath the seabedin accordance with international law;Products of sea fishing and other marine products taken from the high seas by vessels registeredwith a Party or entitled to fly the flag of that Party;Products processed and/or made on board factory ships registered with a Party or entitled to fly theflag of that Party, exclusively from products referred to in paragraph (g) above;Articles collected there which
Register : 26-07-2012 — Putus : 02-05-2013 — Upload : 12-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.44841/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 2 Mei 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
10022
  • memenuhi kriteria dimaksud butir 6.1 di atas,diklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.harusbahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut : 64.01Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luardan bagian atas dari karet atau dariplastik, bagian atasnya tidak dipasangpada sol dan tidak dirakit dengan caradijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup,ditusuk atau proses semacam itu.Waterproof footwear with outer solesand uppers of rubber or of plastics, theuppers of which