Ditemukan 816 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : agnes agoes adref agris apren agres agreet agren agrey agrie
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 31-07-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1412/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 31 Juli 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
53 — 255 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Fees. lo the extent that fonds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promplly open receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Padok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrastors shall agree
Pengadilan PN MARTAPURA Perdata
Register : 12-05-2017 — Putus : 11-04-2018 — Upload : 22-11-2018
Putusan PN MARTAPURA Nomor 13/Pdt.G/2017/PN Mtp
Tanggal 11 April 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
288 — 106
  • Putusan nomor 3992/K/Pdt/1986 tanggal 25September 1989 sekali lagi mempertimbangkan bahwa pengakuanutang dengan memberikan jaminan atau acknowledgement ofindebtness andsecurity agreement agree dipandang bukan sebagaigrosse akte yang dimaksud dalam pasal 224 HIR. Dari pertimbanganputusan ini, jelas terlihat pendirian Mahkamah Agung RepublikIndonesia sebagai berikut : Pengadilan berwenang menilai isi grosseakte.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1434/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (Persero) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
51 — 29 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • BadakNGL Co. atas cash advance jasa pengolahan LNG.Payment Instruction tersebut diterbitkan atas dasarTRUSTEE AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT(1974): ARTICLE 6Deseussesc=ne ce Worse Koxesreecr=o eocessrro CeanomsS12 Pertermines and the Contractors shall submit to the Trustee 62 FPertamina and the Contesstors shall agree with the Tiqmuefaction (Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of Fumd= Gambar VII. TRUSTEE AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT(1974):c.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 23-03-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 23 Maret 2016 — PT. FEGA INDOTAMA lawan LVMH FRAGRANCES & COSMETICS (Singapore) PTE. LTD
439 — 381 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • perkara ini sesuai Pasal 2UndangUndang Nomor 14/1970 khususnya memori penjelasanPasal tersebut;(g) Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 794 K/Sip/1982 tanggal 27Januari 1983, yang pada pokoknya menyatakan:"Memperhatikan Policy Nomor 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978(surat bukti P. 1) di bawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikanbahwa all differences arising out of this Policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in witing by the parties indifference or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Kepailitan
Putus : 12-05-2016 — Upload : 23-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 111 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016
Tanggal 12 Mei 2016 — PT MULTILINE SHIPPING SERVICES VS PT MULTILINTAS AGUNG PERKASA
263 — 152 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., M.H.Biayabiaya Kasasi:Te AGREE sssics conrwecaners axmnmie :Rp 6.000,002. RedakSi ....... eee Rp 5.000,003. Administrasi Kasasi.... :Rp4.989.000,00JUMIAN 00 eee eeeeeeeeeeee :Rp5.000.000,00Untuk SalinanMAHKAMAH AGUNG R.1.An. PaniteraPanitera Muda Perdata KhususRAHMI MULYATI, S.H., M.H.NIP : 19591207 1985 12 2 002 Halaman 59 dari 59 hal. Put. Nomor 111 K/Padt.SusPailit/2016
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1430/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
35 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Vo the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustes shall, promptly upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Bodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to he agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalle to
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 21-02-2017 — Putus : 21-08-2017 — Upload : 17-10-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 101/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 21 Agustus 2017 — Anton Susanto , Berkedudukan di Central Park Residences C-05/02 Kelurahan Tanjung Duren, RT.009, RW.006, Kecamatan Grogol Petamburan, Kota Jakarta Barat, Provinsi DKI Jakarta Indonesia, dalam hal ini memberikan kuasa kepada TIUR H. HUTAGALUNG, S.H., M.H., C.I.L,dkk beralamat di H.B.L & PARTNERS LAW FIRM berkedudukan di Belleza Tower, Lantai 8 Off 5, Jalan Arteri Soepeno Nomor 34 Permata Hijau, Kebayoran Lama, Kota Jakarta Selatan berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tanggal 08 Pebruari 2017, selanjutnya disebut sebagai PENGGUGAT ;
232 — 119
  • Bahwa menurut butir 15.0 dalam Perjanjian Sewa aquo, tentang JamOperasional Normal, menyatakan bahwa :The Lessee Agrees to adhere to operational hour of the FOODAVENUE, Upon the occurrence of any event of default by thelessee where the Lessee does not adhere to the full operationalhour, the lessee agree to pay a penalty of Rp. 500.000, (fiveHundred Thousand Rupiah) per day for each offence.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata
Register : 22-03-2010 — Putus : 06-01-2011 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 133/Pdt.G/2010/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 6 Januari 2011 — PT SUPRA INDODRILL >< PT BABAT KUKUI ENERGI, Dkk
210 — 42
  • Put No,.133/PdtG/20 10/P1V.JK1PSTPERTAMINA will consider such request and agree to extend theContract, provided that CONTRACTOR has fulfill all its obligation underthis Contract and its performance in the execution of this Contract hasbeen satisfactorily accepted by PERTAMINA.
    (Bukti TT 05)PERTAMINA will consider such request and agree to extend the Contract,provided that CONTRACTOR has fulfill all its obligation under thisContract and its performance in the execution of this Contract has beensatisfactorily accepted by PERTAMINA.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pajak Pajak Pertambahan NilaiPPN
Putus : 16-08-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1500 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 16 Agustus 2017 — PT. NEWMONT NUSA TENGGARA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
205 — 67 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Data/Informasi Internet www.mineweb.com; Freeport to pay Mitsubishi 70 percent more for copper TC/RCParagraf 4:Halaman 38 dari 194 halaman Putusan Nomor 1500/B/PK/PJK/2017Reports have said 2009 processing fees between MitsubishiMaterials and Freeport were set at $75 a tonne and 7.5 cents apound, compared to estimates of $ 45 and 4.5 cents in 2008;Freeport, Jiangxi agree almost 60 percent increase in copperTC/RC Paragraf 3:Large Chinese copper smelters, including Jiangxi Copper,received TC/RC of $
    If the umpires assay ishigher than the higher or lower than the lower of the originalassays, the middle one of the original assays shall be final;Splitting Limits:Arsenic (As) 0.03 percentBismuth (Bi) 0.01 percentAntimony (Sb) 0.01 percentLead (Pb) 0.3 percentZinc (Zn) 0.3 percentFluorine (F) 50 ppmChlorine (Cl) 0.005 percentMercury (Hg) 3 ppmNickel (Ni) + Cobalt (Co) 0.1 percentAlumina (Al203) 0.2 percentIf the parties agree to add additional impurities to the list set forthabove pursuant to paragraphs
    8.5, the parties shall agree to theapplicable splitting limits for such additional impurities;Halaman 129 dari 194 halaman Putusan Nomor 1500/B/PK/PJK/201711.4 Cost of Umpires Assay.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 29-06-2021 — Putus : 24-08-2021 — Upload : 30-11-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 315/PDT/2021/PT DKI
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2021 — Pembanding/Tergugat III : Samadhi Capital Consulting Pte. Ltd Diwakili Oleh : Samadhi Capital Consulting Pte. Ltd
Pembanding/Tergugat IV : Lego Industry Pte. Ltd Diwakili Oleh : Samadhi Capital Consulting Pte. Ltd
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT Arsynergy Resources Diwakili Oleh : LONTOH & PARTNERS
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat I : Technics Offshore Engineering Pte., Ltd
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT Technics Offshore Jaya
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat V : PT Mega Altra Titan
121 — 104
  • In the event the arbitrators selected by both Partiesare unable to agree on the selection of a third arbitrator withinsuch thirty day period, either party may request that the thirdarbitrator be selected by BANI.d. No arbitration arising out of or relating to this Agreement shallinclude, by consolidation or enjoinder or in any other manner,an additional person or entity not a Party to this Agreementexcept by written consent of both Parties.e.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1428/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
45 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • I'o the extent hat funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promptly upon reeeiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Com.pooy from the Bodok Payment Account the amount af such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on apprepriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyaldc to
Pengadilan PN TANJUNG PINANG Perdata
Register : 24-06-2016 — Putus : 27-12-2016 — Upload : 23-05-2017
Putusan PN TANJUNG PINANG Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2016/PN Tpg
Tanggal 27 Desember 2016 — NICHOLAS MARK OGDEN( Penggugat) PT. BINTAN LAGOON RESOR ( Tergugat)
110 — 33
  • TpgPasal 17.2 PERJANJIAN INDUK(kutipan):The parties hereto agree to submitto the nonexclusive jurisdiction ofthe Indonesian court.Pasal 21.2 PERJANJIANPENGELOLAAN (kutipan):The Second Party herebyirrevocably ad unconditionallysubmit to the nonexclusifjurisdiction of teh courts of theRepublic of Indonesia fordetermining any dispute concerningthis Agreement or the transactionscontemplated by this Agreement...Terjemahannya (kutipan):Para pihak dalam perjanjian inisetuju untuk tunduk pada yurisdiksinoneksklusif
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 21-07-2020 — Putus : 21-09-2021 — Upload : 21-09-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 555/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 21 September 2021 — Penggugat:
PT. SPIE OIL and GAS SERVICES INDONESIA
Tergugat:
SAMIR ABBES,
322 — 282
  • The parties agree after discussion andnegotiation that in order to provide both parties with a fairand accessible forum operating in the English or Frenchlanguage for resolving disputes that may arise out of theemployment relationship, any disputes arising under thisContract of Employment that cannot be resolved amicablyHalaman 26 dari 69 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 555/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.
Pengadilan PN GUNUNG SUGIH Perdata
Register : 04-09-2018 — Putus : 17-07-2017 — Upload : 04-09-2018
Putusan PN GUNUNG SUGIH Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Gns
Tanggal 17 Juli 2017 — EDI HARIANTO PENGGUGAT I m e l a w a n I.PT. BUSSAN AUTO FINANCE
238 — 231
  • Putusan nomor3992/K/Pdt/1986 tanggal 25 September 1989 sekali lagi mempertimbangkanbahwa pengakuan utang dengan =memberikan jaminan atauacknowledgement of indebtness andsecurity agreement agree dipandangbukan sebagai grosse akte yang dimaksud dalam pasal 224 HIR.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 03-06-2015 — Putus : 11-05-2016 — Upload : 13-10-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 339/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 11 Mei 2016 — KZI SINGAPORE PTE.LTD, lawan 1. PT. ASURANSI RECAPITAL, 2. PT. PUTRA SAMUDRA (dalam pailit),
332 — 218
  • PENGGUGAT dan TURUTTERGUGAT, merupakan Perjanjian Pokok dan yang kemudian dijamin olehTERGUGAT dengan menerbitkan 2 (dua) jaminan berupa surety bond.Pertama, Advance Payment Bond pada tanggal 9 Juni 2012 dengan nomorHDO/BAPB/02/2012/00041 (Advance Payment Bond); Kedua,Performance Bond pada tanggal 28 Februari 2013 dengan nomorHDO/BPB/99/2013/00119, nilai Bond USD 3,600,000.00 (PerformanceBond).Bahwa pada Pasal 3 huruf c.i Perjanjian PENGGUGAT TURUTTERGUGAT, berbunyi sebagai berikut :The Parties agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Putus : 29-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 238 PK/Pdt/2014
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2014 — PT BERKAH KARYA BERSAMA, vs Ny. SITI HARDIYANTI RUKMANA,,dkk
3514 — 3111 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • pihak PT Asuransi Royal Indrapura vs Sohadi Kawilarang.Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum;Dalam Policy Nomor 49/00137/08, tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa alldifferences arising out of this Policy shall be reffered to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in diferrence or if they cannot agree
    PT Asuransi Royal Indrapura vs Sohadi Kawilarang;Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasan MahkamahAgung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkanhukum;Dalam Policy Nomor 49/00137/08, tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa alldifferences arising out of this Policy shall be reffered to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties indiferrence or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 07-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1427/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 September 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO), vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
38 — 26 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • To the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustes shall, prompily upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Podok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,Porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contrastors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalde to
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1429/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Feos. lo the extent that fonds are then held inthe Badak Poyment Account the Trustee shall, prompily upon reeeiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has heen approved for payment, poy to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,pursuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertanina and the Contrastors shall agree
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 12-11-2018 — Putus : 11-02-2019 — Upload : 13-06-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 706/PDT/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 11 Februari 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : SYAFRUDDIN ARSYAD TEMENGGUNG
Terbanding/Tergugat I : MENTERI KEUANGAN QQ PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT PERUSAHAAN PENGELOLA ASET PERSERO
292 — 184
  • Sementara itu dalam tuntutan Penggugat dibagian petitumnya, antara lain: menyatakan sah dan mengikat secara hukum (i) PerjanjianMaster Settlement and Acqusition Agree(MG&AiA) tanggal 21September 1998 berikut perubahannya dan (ii) kKeputusankeputusan KKSK; menyatakan penerbitan Surat Pemenuhan KewajibanPemegang Saham (PKPS) No.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 22-06-2012 — Putus : 28-03-2013 — Upload : 04-05-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 370/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 28 Maret 2013 — PT SANDIPALA ARTHAPUTRA. Lawan 1. MUEHLBAUER AG. 2. MUEHLBAUER TECHNOLOGIES Sdn Bhd.
385 — 312
  • dan ketentuan butir 5 (lima) draftAmandemen 2 Atas Kontrak Pembelian Mesin Tergugat II, dinyatakan bahwasebagai jaminan sisa pembayaran atas mesinmesin yang dibeli oleh Penggugatdari Para Tergugat, maka Penggugat berkewajiban untuk memasang danmendaftarkanjaminan fidusia atas mesinmesin produksi EKTP yang dibelioleh Penggugat dari Para Tergugat, yang dikutip sebagai berikut:As substitute to the Buyers guarantees and securities mentioned in No.3 bullets I and 2 of the First Amendment, the Parties agree
    Tergugat I dan ketentuan butir 5 (lima)Amandemen 2 Atas Kontrak Pembelian Mesin Tergugat II, dinyatakan bahwasebagai jaminan sisa pembayaran atas mesinmesin yang dibeli oleh Penggugatdari Para Tergugat, maka Penggugat berkewajiban untuk memasang danmendaftarkan jaminan fidusia atas mesinmesin produksi EKTP yang dibelioleh Penggugat dari Para Tergugat, yang dikutip sebagai berikut:As substitute to the Buyers guarantees and securities mentioned in No.3 bullets I and 2 of the First Amendment, the Parties agree