Ditemukan 544 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 25-07-2011 — Putus : 15-08-2012 — Upload : 14-04-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 444/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 15 Agustus 2012 —
12374
  • ;Bahwa meskipun demikian PT AAA belumlah menjadi pemilik atasbarangBarang tersebut sampai PT AAA melunasi secara penuh hargaBarang yang telah disepakati baik secara langsung maupun berkala,sebagaimana telah diatur di dalam Pasal 18 Sale Contract yang antara lainmenegaskan:Notwithstanding delivery of the Goods or passing of risk in the Goods tothe Buyers or any rule, regulation or provision to thecontrary, title to the Goods shall not under any circumstances whatsoeverpass to the Buyers until the
    jaminan, pada tanggai 14 Februari 2011;12,13.Bahwa surat perintah pengeluaran Barang tersebut dikeluarkanTergugat segera setelah PT AAA melakukan pelunasan/memenuhikewajiban hukumnya, adalah sesuai dengan prosedur pelepasanBarang dari gudanggudang penyimpanan, yang secara tegas danjelas telah diatur di dalam ketentuan Pasal 17 Sale Contract sertapada bagian Pernyataan/Recitals huruf (D) CMA September 2010 danCMA 5 Januari 2011:Pasal 17 Sale Contract:The Goods shall remain in storage unless and until
Register : 04-02-2019 — Putus : 02-04-2019 — Upload : 18-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 79/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 2 April 2019 — Identitas Pihak Tidak Dipublikasi
259194
  • arbitrators fees, experts fees, and all other costs, fees and expenses of any kind arising from this arbitration, amounting to USD98,306.44 and SGD 101,341.49;Order that the Respondent pay the Claimant interest over allamounts due and payable to the Claimant pursuant to this FinalAward as stated in this Dispositive in the form of monthly compound interest on the total award amounts that may become outstanding from time to time, commencing the first business day following the date of this Award until
Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 30-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 404 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2015
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — Mr.LEIGH MURRAY YAXLEY VS PRESIDENT AND GENERAL MANAGER TATELY
164122 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • (Company Nomor 87301)Registered Address: Kaya (Jombi) Mesning 36, Curacao"24th April 2014 To all Staff Re: Actin President and General Manager of TatelyNV and Accociated Companies in Indonesia.This is to confirm that Nina Marliana has taken the role of Acting President andGeneral Manager of Tately N.V. and Associated Companies in Indonesia witheffect from 1*tMarch 2014 until further notice.Yours faithfully, For and on behalf of TATELY N.V., by its Managing DirectorSGG Management (Coracao) N.V.signed
Register : 16-07-2018 — Putus : 07-09-2018 — Upload : 09-07-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 408/PDT/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 7 September 2018 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. Jasa Angkasa Semesta Tbk Diwakili Oleh : Reza Mahastra,SH.MH.
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT. Gatari Air Services
333203
  • Notwithstanding Sub Article 6.2 of the Main Agreement,settlement of account shall be effected by the Carrier within 30days of receiving a correct invoice(s);6.2 An interest of 1% per month shall carry until is settle after 45days of receiving a correct invoice(s).Bahwa ketentuan diatas dapat diterjemahkan secara bebassebagai berikut:Halaman 5 dari 43 hal Putusan Nomor 408/PDT/2018/PT DKI10.6.1.
Register : 18-05-2017 — Putus : 18-09-2017 — Upload : 14-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 326/Pdt.G/2017/PN.JKT.PST.
Tanggal 18 September 2017 — LEMBAGA SWADAYA MASYARAKAT PEDULI MUTU PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL X PT PERTAMINA ( PERSERO )
30579
  • LINGKUNGANRupiah)DEVELOPMENTPROGRAM (milion Rupiah)(juta Penyaluran Program Bina Lingkungan Community Development ProgramDistribution fo 1 Januari31 Desember 2012 (EC1) (EN30) (EC8) 1 January31December 2012 period (EC1) (EN30) (ECE)Jenis Bantuan Sampai dengan Penyaluran Sampai Type ofTahun/Until tahun/Distributi dengan DonationYear on Year 2012 Desember/Unti December2011 rupiah2012 rupiahrupiah(1) (2) (3) (4)(2)+(3) (1)Bantuan 36.576.435.924 1.691.593.300 38.268.029.22 AssisfanceKorban 4 for naturalbencana
Register : 10-02-2011 — Putus : 15-03-2012 — Upload : 30-04-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 15 Maret 2012 — PT. PUKUAFU INDAH (PT. PI), M E L A W A N 1. NEWMONT INDONESIA LIMITED (NIL) (DENVER), 2. NUSA TENGGARA MINING CORPORATION (NTMC) (Tokyo),
161111
  • Company, or any partthereof, to a third party provided that no such assignment shall be madeorhave any effect until all necessary Government approval thereto hasbeen obtained.Terjemahan:Dengan memperhatikan ketentuan Klausul 8, Newmont dapatMengalihkan seluruh Kepentingannya dan kepemilikan Sahamnya pada Perusahaan P.T., atau bagian daripadanya, kepada pihak ketiga dengan ketentuan bahwa pengalihan tersebut tidak boleh dilakukan atau belummulai berlaku efektif hingga segala persetujuan yang diperlukan
    Company to a third party Indonesiannational but further provided that no such assignment shall be made orhave any effect until all necessary Government approval thereto has beenobtained.Terjemahan:Dengan tunduk pada ketentuan Klausul 8, dan pada Newmont dalamkewenangannya sematamemberipersetujuannya, Indahdapatmengalihkan seluruh Kepentingannya dan kepemilikan Sahamnya padaPerusahaan P.T. kepadapihakketiga yang berkewarganegaraanIndonesia tetapi dengan ketentuan bahwa pengalihan tersebut tidakboleh
Putus : 09-11-2011 — Upload : 22-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 844 K/Pid.Sus/2010
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2011 — BASRI alias BAH ;SYUKRI ;
2819 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Keterpaduan sistem peradilanpidana dimaknai sebagai "...the collective institutions through which in accusedoffender passes until the accusations have been dispossed of or the assessedHal. 15 dari 35 hal. Put. No. 844 K/Pid.Sus/2010punishment concluded..". Sistem peradilan pidana terpadu bukanlah suatusistem yang bekerja dalam satu unit kerja atau bagian yang menyatu secaraharfiah melainkan adanya kombinasi yang serasi antar sub sistem untukmencapai satu tujuan.
Register : 21-02-2016 — Putus : 06-03-2013 — Upload : 26-07-2016
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 13/PID/TPK/2014/PT.DKI
Tanggal 6 Maret 2013 — SIMON GUNAWAN TANJAYA
248159
  • satu) bundel fotocopy Executive Summary LaporanPerkembangan Pasar Minyak Bulan April 2013 ;1 (satu) lembar kertas yang bertuliskan Deputi PengendalianKomersial Divisi Komersialisasi Minyak dan Kondensat... 511 (sebelas) lembar bahan paparan Kunjungan Kerja SKK Migas2013 tanggal 22 Maret 2013 oleh WIDHYAWANPRAWIRAATMADJA Deputi Pengendalian Komersial ;1 (satu) buah buku Laporan SKK Migas Kepada Presiden RILaporan Kuartal 2013 berikut 1 (satu) lembar kertas yangdiantaranya bertuliskan Bidding Plan Until
    satu) bundel fotocopy Executive Summary LaporanPerkembangan Pasar Minyak Bulan April 2013 ;1 (satu) lembar kertas yang bertuliskan Deputi PengendalianKomersial Divisi Komersialisasi Minyak dan Kondensat... ;11 (sebelas) lembar bahan paparan Kunjungan Kerja SKK Migas2013 tanggal 22 Maret 2013 oleh WIDHYAWANPRAWIRAATMADJA Deputi Pengendalian Komersial ;1 (satu) buah buku Laporan SKK Migas Kepada Presiden RILaporan Kuartal 2013 berikut 1 (satu) lembar kertas yangdiantaranya bertuliskan Bidding Plan Until
Putus : 30-09-2013 — Upload : 28-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 167 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2013
Tanggal 30 September 2013 — PT. YAYASAN SEKOLAH INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA VS ANDREW IVAN WARD
8679 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • yang selanjutnya kami kutip sebagai berikut:Given all the circumstances above ve are offering you the opportunityto resign your post (effective at the end of Term 2, 2012).Yang terjemahan bebasnya sebagai berikut:perdasarkan seluruh keadaan yang telah disebutkan di atas, kamimenawarkan anda untuk mengundurkan diri dari posisi anda (mulaiberlaku pada akhir Term 2, 2012);Bahwa pada paragraf ke10 (sepuluh) surat yang sama, selanjutnyakami kutip sebagai berikut:We are prepare to continue your FTEA until
Register : 24-08-2015 — Putus : 21-01-2016 — Upload : 25-10-2016
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 597/Pdt.G/2015/PN Dps
Tanggal 21 Januari 2016 —
13879
  • The fees and expensesof the arbitrating entity and other related expenses shalfbe borne by the losing Party unless otherwsedetermined by the arbitrating entity.Hali4dari 49halaman. putusan sela Nomor 5971Pdt.G120J 51PN Dps.14.3Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until thearbitration tribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, exceptin the event of expiration, termination or failure by any of theother Parties to obey or comply with a specific order or decisionof the arbitration
Register : 21-11-2016 — Putus : 06-02-2018 — Upload : 23-02-2018
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 819/Pdt.G/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 6 Februari 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
443403
  • Hal ini secara jelas diaturdalam Pasal 4 Confidentiality Agreement yang dikutip oleh Tergugat dan IIsebagaimana berikut :This agreement will take effect on the date when it is signed by both partiesand will remain in force until the discussion and/or negotiations end withacontract including the present confidentiality provisions.
Register : 02-01-2012 — Putus : 21-11-2013 — Upload : 11-11-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 515/Pdt.G/2012/PN.JKT.BAR.
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2013 —
358412
  • theimplementation of Article 56 section ( 1 ) of The IndonesianArbitration Law, the parties expressly agree that the arbitrationtribunal shall be solely bound by strict rules of law in making theirdecision and may not render an award based on aquitableprinciple ( ex aequo et bono ) and/or other considerations ; ( ii )the parties agree to waive Article 48 section ( 1 ) and 73 paragraph( b ) of the Indonesian Arbitration Law, so that the mandate of thearbitration tribunal duly appointed shall remain in effect until
Register : 05-12-2017 — Putus : 15-03-2018 — Upload : 05-04-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 760/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 15 Maret 2018 — PT.MULTI SELERA INDONESIA >< ANTON SUSANTO
18773
  • Tergugat Dalam Rekonpensi telah melakukanwanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Sewa aquo.17.Bahwa menurut butir 22.0 dalam Perjanjian Sewa aquo tentangPenghentian Awal, dikutib sbb:22.0 Early Termination : There is no Provision for early Termination,and therefore, in the event that the Lessee terminated this agreementor vacates the Demised Premises prior the expire that of the Lease Halaman 42 Putusan Nomor 760/PDT/2017/PT.DKIperiod then the Lessee is obligated to setile the Base Rent andService Charge until
Putus : 07-03-2017 — Upload : 20-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3370 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 7 Maret 2017 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI vs. Perseroan Terbatas (PT) Bali Resort & Leisure (PT Bali Resort & Leisure Company),
147110 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity andother related expenses shall be borne by the losing Party unlessotherwise determined by the arbitrating entity;Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until the arbitrationtribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, except in the event ofHalaman 11 dari 38 hal. Put.
Register : 01-12-2020 — Putus : 03-11-2021 — Upload : 08-11-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1006/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 3 Nopember 2021 — Penggugat:
Wasco Engineering International Limited
Tergugat:
PT KPM Oil & Gas
331236
  • WASCO shall not be obliged toexecute the tasks in clause 3 (b) below until WASCO hasreceived the said USD 600,000 (United States Dollars SixHundred Thousand).Terjemahan resmi dan tersumpah sebagai berikut:(a) Perwakilan yang sah dari Para Pihak akan bertemu diIndonesia untuk menandatangani Perjanjian ini. Tanggal EfektifPerjanjian ini adalah tanggal pada saat Penanjian iniHalaman 5 dari 49 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 1006/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Selditandatangani.
Putus : 08-02-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3715 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 8 Februari 2017 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI VS PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT & LEISURE (PT BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY
15380 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • and no Party shall dispute or question the decision ofthe arbitration tribunal before any judicial authority in the Republicof Indonesia or elsewhere;(e) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity;Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until
Register : 16-09-2014 — Putus : 09-04-2015 — Upload : 08-07-2015
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 658/Pdt.G/2014/PN.DPS
Tanggal 9 April 2015 — ADE CHAIRANI NURSYAFITRI MELAWAN PT. BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY
8846
  • Dpsd) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity.2 Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until the arbitrationtribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, except in the event ofexpiration, termination or failure by any of the other
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 26-10-2016 — Upload : 05-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1083 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 26 Oktober 2016 — PT. LAFARGE CEMENT INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
6539 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • pada saat terjadinya pengalihan saham tersebut,Penggugat seharusnya sudah menyerahkan SKD pada saat pelaporan.Bahwa pada kenyataannya memang SKD / COD Cementia Holding AGditerbitkan pada tanggal 22 November 2010 oleh Kantonales SteueramtZurich selaku otoritas yang berwenang di negara Swiss, namun demikiandi dalam SKD Cementia Holding AG (lampiran ke11) tersebut secarajelas dinyatakan bahwa:It is hereby certified that the claimant has been a resident of Switzerlandduring the period from 1.1.2007 until
Putus : 18-05-2016 — Upload : 30-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 26 PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016
Tanggal 18 Mei 2016 — 1. ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, DKK VS 1. PT AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, DKK
14501899 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 26 PK/Pat.SusArbt/2016stake in the reference which has (until now) been very hard fought at everystage. The issues were complex and the documents voluminous. TheTribunal see no reason to reduce any award for costs simply on the basisthat the amounts claimed are excessive;19.In principle, the Claimants should have their costs as the obviouslysuccessful party.
Putus : 21-05-2013 — Upload : 28-03-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 891 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 21 Mei 2013 — PT DIRECT VISION VS ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, Dkk
577422 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 891 K/Pdt.Sus/2012(ii).take no further steps in the Indonesian proceedings save todiscontinue them as set out in (i) in so far as they concern C.6,C.7, C.8 and Mr Marshall;(iii).be prohibited from bringing any further proceedings against C.6,C.7, C.8 and Mr Marshall in so far as they relate to the joint venturerelationship other than by way of arbitration pursuant to clause 17.4of the SSA;until further Order;Terjemahan Resmi (vide Bukti P5B) (kutipan, dengan penambahanketerangan dan penebalan