Ditemukan 814 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : agnes agoes agris apren adref agres agreet agren agrey agrie
Pengadilan PN SURABAYA Pidana Umum Penghinaan
Putus : 18-05-2015 — Upload : 23-06-2015
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 492/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sby
Tanggal 18 Mei 2015 — MARTO UTOMO, SEM.Agr
35 — 5
  • Surya Mitra Pertiwi bergerak dalam usaha Agree cultur produk dan developmentinvesment, atau memproduksi hasilhasil perikanan, pertanian dan pengembanganinvestasi, Tugas dan tanggungiawab saksi sebagai Direktur Utama adalah berdasarkanjob discription dalam ADART.untuk perinciannya apa saja saksi tidak lupa.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA TIMUR Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 06-09-2010 — Putus : 03-08-2011 — Upload : 01-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA TIMUR Nomor 405/PDT.G/2010/PN.JKT.TIM
Tanggal 3 Agustus 2011 — PT.SUPERIOR COACH lawan PT. WIRA INSANI Cs
191 — 77
  • In the event thatHalaman 23, Putusan No.405/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Tim.such dispute, controversy or difference cannot be settled withinthirty (30) days after written notice by one (1) party to the other(the Notice Dispute) both parties agree to submit the disputeto a Board Arbitration, conducted to the extent theaccordance with the Rules of Arbitration Procedure of theIndonesia National Board of Arbitration (BANI) by three (3)arbitrators.Terjemahan Resmi:Semua sengketa, pertentangan atau perbedaan yang
    melawan Sohandi Kawilarang yang intinyamenyatakan:Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasan MahkamahAgung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkanhukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/D0/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawahbagian tentang Conditions telah diasuransikan bahwa Alldifferences arising out of this policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the partiesin differences or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan PT SAMARINDA Perdata
Register : 28-11-2018 — Putus : 08-01-2019 — Upload : 03-07-2019
Putusan PT SAMARINDA Nomor 155/PDT/2018/PT SMR
Tanggal 8 Januari 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : SUNOKO WIRYO SENTONO, SH. Diwakili Oleh : SIGIT SUBIYANTO
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. BANK MANDIRI PERSERO, Tbk
Terbanding/Tergugat II : RUDDYANTHO TANTRY, SH
Terbanding/Tergugat III : Pemerintah Republik Indonesia c.q Kementerian keuangan c.q Direktur Jenderal Kekayaan Negara di Jakarta c.q Kantor Wilayah Direktur Jenderal Kekayaan Negara Kalimantan Timur c.q Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang atau KPKNL Kota Samarinda
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : Badan Pertanahan Nasional di Jakarta c.q Kantor Pertanahan Kota Samarinda
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat : Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
61 — 50
  • Putusan nomor 3992/K/Pdt/1986tanggal 25 September 1989 sekali lagi mempertimbangkan bahwapengakuan utang dengan memberikan jaminan atau acknowledgement ofindebtness andsecurity agreement agree dipandang bukan sebagai grosseakte yang dimaksud dalam pasal 224 HIR. Dari pertimbangan putusan ini,jelas terlinat pendirian MA Republik Indonesia sebagai berikut : Pengadilanberwenang menilai isi grosse akte.
Pengadilan PN KOTOBARU Pidana Umum
Register : 21-05-2019 — Putus : 18-07-2019 — Upload : 11-12-2019
Putusan PN KOTOBARU Nomor 64/Pid.B/2019/PN Kbr
Tanggal 18 Juli 2019 — Penuntut Umum:
ENIZARTI, S.H.
Terdakwa:
1.Yuzi Azhar Panggilan Ozi
2.Syahrul Wadi Panggilan Wadi
59 — 29
  • li>
  • 2 (dua) helai baju Mansek warna Hitam;
  • 64 (enam puluh empat) helai celana lejing panjang warna hitam ;
  • 1 (satu) buah tas warna merah;
  • 1 (satu) buah tas warna cream;
  • 24 (dua puluh empat) helai celana shot warna hitam;
  • 35 (tiga puluh lima) helai Singlet pria warna putih;
  • 3 (tiga) helai baju Singlet merek Crocodle;
  • 61 (enam puluh satu) helai Celana merek LYDYLY;
  • 20 (dua puluh) helai Celana Hamil mama merek Pgut Agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Putus : 18-05-2016 — Upload : 30-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 26 PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016
Tanggal 18 Mei 2016 — 1. ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, DKK VS 1. PT AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, DKK
1461 — 1917 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The Parties agree that none of the Parties will beallowed to commence or maintain any action in any court of law withrespect to any Dispute, except for the enforcement of arbitral awardHalaman 22 dari 41 hal. Put. Nomor 26 PK/Padt.SusArbt/2016granted pursuant to proceedings commenced pursuant to Clause 17.4or interim orders under Clause 17.11;Terjemahan resmi:Tidak ada proses pengadilan.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 08-02-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3715 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 8 Februari 2017 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI VS PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT & LEISURE (PT BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY
153 — 80 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The arbitrationpanel shall consist of three (3) arbitrators, one (1) chosen by thecomplainant, one (1) chosen by the respondent and a chairman chosenby the arbitrators named by the complainant and the respondent;The Parties expressly agree that:(a) the arbitration tribunal shall decide the matter as expeditiously aspossible, and the arbitration shall be complete and the decisionissued by the arbitrators no later than twelve (12) months after thedate of commencement of the arbitration proceedings
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1075 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
42 — 16 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • faction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of fundspayalde to the Liquefaction Company porsiut te Seelinn G1, nelshall advise the Trustee of such procedures whieh shall include o requirceocnt that the Lierfaection Compuny fornish the Trosiee will aeacknowledsient thut cach poyenenl by the Treaster lereunlor Fullysatisfies the linkililies of Meriaenina or the Coulractors, as tae casemay be, will respect to thq.invoies to whiel: Ue puyment relotos.62 Portamina and the Contractors shall agree
Pengadilan PT BANDUNG Perdata
Register : 16-11-2020 — Putus : 16-12-2020 — Upload : 05-01-2021
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 620/PDT/2020/PT BDG
Tanggal 16 Desember 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : YPK AMPERA YAPERMA Diwakili Oleh : Ahmad Rifai Maulana
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT. DIPO STAR FINANCE Cabang Karawang
115 — 43
  • tujuh) Januari 1983, kaidah hukumnya sebagaiberikut :Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa alldifferences arising out of this Policy shall be reffered to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in diferrence or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 805/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Feos. lo the extent that funds ore then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promplly apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the DPodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 14-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 814/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (Persero) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Fees. lo the extent that fonds are then held inthe Badak Poyment Account the Trustes shall, prompily upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the odok Payment Account the amount of such invoice, pursuant to procedures to be agreed Upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrastors shall agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 807/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
35 — 16 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Io the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, prompily upon receiptef notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Com.pouy from the Bodok Payment Account the amount of such involve,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrastors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalde io
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 14-06-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 907/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PZ CUSSONS INDONESIA
117 — 72 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Holding Ltd berkaitan dengan Technical Assistance,selama tahuh 2008 PZ Cussons Holding Ltd telah memberikan jasa kepadaperusahaan Pemohon Banding antara lain sebagai berikut:1) Root/cause analysis and validation of stock variances in Indonesia2) Develop understanding and delivery of "Nile" reporting and KPIs3) Configuration of GM IS and TM1 to support S&OP4) Optimizing and developing the model to suit the Indonesia business5) Support implementation plan for Indonesia6) Participate in Workshops to agree
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 10-04-2018 — Putus : 30-01-2019 — Upload : 08-09-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 299/Pdt.G/2018/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 30 Januari 2019 — Penggugat:
PT Majuko Utama Indonesia
Tergugat:
PT Igas Utama
113 — 87
  • BOTH PARTIES hereby agree to set aside the provisions inArticles 1266, 1267 of Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata.Terjemahan bebas dari bunyi Pasal 20 Ayat (1) Perjanjian BOT tersebut adalahsebagai berikut :Hal. 12 dari 66 hal. Putusan No. 299/Pdt.G/2018/PN/JKt. Sel.PASAL 20PENGAKHIRAN1. Perjanjian ini tidak dapat dihentikan kecuali disetujui oleh kedua belahpihak.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1433/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
51 — 25 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Chompony from the odok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,Pporenact fo procedures to be agreed upon purseont te Section 6.2.62 Perlamina and the Contractors shall agree with tho Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payable to the Liqaefaction Company purswt te Section G1, mmthal mvise Ge Trostes of sech posclares whitch elit inedocke wrequitcepent that the Liquefselion Caenpuny furnish the Posteo wilh aestkuowledenmenl thuk each poyerewh bey tle Trier lorewelor
Pengadilan PN DENPASAR
Register : 24-08-2015 — Putus : 21-01-2016 — Upload : 25-10-2016
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 597/Pdt.G/2015/PN Dps
Tanggal 21 Januari 2016 —
140 — 84
  • The = arbitration panel shall consist of three (3)arbitrators, one (1) chosen by the complainant, one (1)chosen by the responden,t and a chairman chosen by thearbitrators named by the complainant and the respondent.The Parties expressly agree that:(a)the arbitration tribunal shall decide the matter asexpeditiously as possible, and the arbitration shall becomplete and the decision issued by the arbitrators nolater than twelve (12) months after the date ofcommencement of the arbitration proceedings
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 03-08-2016 — Upload : 11-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 328 PK/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 3 Agustus 2016 — BRIAN LEE SKINNER, dkk vs AGUS ERMAWAN
67 — 30 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Tergugat dengan tidak profesionalhanya menyampaikan secara lisan bahwa calon klien masih diusahakandan dikejar;Bahwa Tergugat tidak mau bertemu dengan Penggugat di kantor Tergugat untuk membahas divisi pelatihan, melainkan selalu meminta bertemu dicafe, restoran dan tempat makan lainnya dan tidak mau membahasrencana kerja dan pencapaian target;Article 5 Cooperation Agreement:The Parties hereto agree that in the interest of this cooperation, themeeting beetwen the paraties hereto wel be held at least
Pengadilan PN DENPASAR Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 10-06-2016 — Putus : 22-03-2017 — Upload : 29-08-2017
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 417/Pdt.G/2016/PN Dps
Tanggal 22 Maret 2017 — Brett Anthony Coad, DK MELAWAN Peter Frawley, DKK
122 — 97
  • International menyewakan kembali Villa Alu No. 5kepada Arie Reiss berdasarkan Sublease Agreement tertanggal 9September 2005.Kemudian Arie Reiss mengalihkan hak dan kewajibannya yang diperolehdari PT ACMN Indo International kepada Tergugat IV dan Ross GrahamTinney, lan Maxwell Lowther dan Susan Pamela Lowther, berdasarkanLease Transfer Agreement tertanggal 10 September 2011.Dalam Pasal 13 paragraf 2 Lease Transfer Agreement tertanggal 10September 2011, disebutkan bahwa:The Parties hereto expressly agree
    The Partieshereto further expressly agree that Article 56 paragraph 1 of the said Lawnumber 30 of 1999 regarding arbitration shall apply to the extent that thearbitrators shall be bound by strict rules of law in making their decision,but may no pronounce judgment ex aequo et bono.Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:Para Pihak dengan ini secara tegas menyetujui bahwa Pasal 6 dariUndangUndang nomor 30 tahun 1999 mengenai arbitrase akan berlakusehingga tidak akan dilakukan banding ke pengadilan manapun atasputusan
    berdasarkan SubleaseAgreement tertanggal 18 April 2005.Kemudian Rajesh Melwani (atau Rajesh Ramesh Melwani) dan LaraMelwani (atau Lara Komal Rajesh Melwani) mengalihkan hak dankewajibannya yang diperoleh dari PT ACMN Indo International kepadaTergugat V berdasarkan Lease Transfer Agreement, tertanggal 11 Januari2011.Hal 163 dari 247 halaman Putusan Nomor 417/Pat.G/2016/PN.DpsDalam Pasal 13 paragraf 2 Lease Transfer Agreement tertanggal 11Januari 2011, disebutkan bahwa:The Parties hereto expressly agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 811/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. Pertamina (Persero) vs. Direktur Jenderal Pajak
42 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on aceoontof LNG Processing Fees. lo the extent that fonds are then held inthe Badak Poyment Account the Trustee shall, promplly apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has heen approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Bodak Payment Aeeount the amount of such invoice,porsuact to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1036 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
41 — 23 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • To the extent that fonds ore then held inthe Badak Poyment Account the Trustes shall, prompily upon receiptef notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Com.pooy from the Podok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalde to
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 18-07-2019 — Putus : 17-10-2019 — Upload : 25-10-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 422/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 17 Oktober 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat III : CARRIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD Diwakili Oleh : HISWARA BUNJAMIN and TANDJUNG
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT TOPJAYA SARANA UTAMA Diwakili Oleh : APRILDA FIONA, SH.MH.
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat I : TOSHIBA CORPORATION Diwakili Oleh : TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II : CARRIER CORPORATION Diwakili Oleh : HISWARA BUNJAMIN and TANDJUNG
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat I : TOSHIBA CARRIER CORPORATION Diwakili Oleh : HISWARA BUNJAMIN and TANDJUNG
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : TOSHIBA CARRIER THAILAND CO., LTD Diwakili Oleh : HISWARA BUNJAMIN and TANDJUNG
633 — 3159
  • TOPJAYASARANA UTAMA, an Indonesian corporation ("Sarana"), agree as followsregarding the Exclusive Distribution Agreement dated July 1, 1998 between theparties hereto ("Agreement):2. Airconditioner shall be hereby deleted from the Schedule of Products attachedto the Agreement as Exhibit ."