Ditemukan 2114 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 04-08-2017 — Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1527 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
5133 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixedplace of business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, ingeneral, prepatory or auxilary activities.Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory or auxilaiarycharacter and those which have not.
    Jikaperusahaan menjalankan usahanya seperti yang dikatakansebelumnya, laba dari perusahaan itu bisa dikenakan pajak di Negaralain itu, tetapi hanya mengenai bagian laba yang dianggap berasaldari pendirian tetap tersebut.OECD MODEL 2008Pasal 5 ayat (1)For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2)List of PEpositive definition:Place of managementBranchOfficeFactoryWorkshopor
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 536/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2717 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • kelihatanmemenuhi syarat kedua karena pembuatannya dengan cara injectionmoulding, karena untuk masuk pos 64.02 harus memenuhi syaratpembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusukatau dengan cara semacam itu.Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : The Headingcovers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivets orsimilar devices;(6) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    are producedin one piece usually attached to the base or platform by riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers of which,being produced in one piece or assembled other than by stitching,are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the sole byplugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1526 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. CHARABOT SA;
5034 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • harus dipenuhi agar Indonesia dalamhal ini dapat mengenakan pajak, Pemohon Banding dalam halini walau memiliki kehadiran yang permanen, namun tidakmenjalankan usaha di tempatnya tersebut;Bahwa pada Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf e dari P3B IndonesiaPerancis, dinyatakan bahwa "the term permanent establishmentshall not be deemed to include: ...the maintenance of a fixedplace of business solely for the purpose of advertising, for thesupply of information, for scientific research, or for similaractivities which
    Hal ini sudah dengan amatjelas diatur di P3B, dan Pemohon Banding sudah amat jelasmemenuhi ketentuan bahwa kantor di Indonesia bukanlah BUT.Kegiatan usaha dilakukan langsung oleh kantor pusat, danpenghasilan juga diterima langsung oleh kantor pusat;Bahwa Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis menyebutkanbahwa "for the purposes of this convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on";Bahwa hal ini
    dari struktur organisasi tersebut terlihat bahwa kantorperwakilan (representative office) CHARABOT SA yang ada diIndonesia tersebut tidak melakukan kegiatan usaha seperti usahauntuk produksi, usaha penjualan/perdagangan (ekspor/impor)tetapi hanya sekedar kegiatan riset pemasaran produkprodukKantor Pusatnya;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B IndonesiaPerancis,dijelaskan sebagai berikut:"For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which
    kegiatanusaha yang berorientasi profit dan hanya sekedar kegiatan risetpemasaran produkproduk Kantor Pusatnya saja;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (2) P3B IndonesiaPerancis,disebutkan bahwa:"The term "permanent establishment" shall include especially :(a) a place of management", (b) a branch, (c) an office, (d) afactory, (e) a workshop, (f) a farm or plantation, (g) a mine, an oilwell, quarry or other place of extraction of natural resources, (h)abuilding site or construction or assembly project which
    Putusan Nomor 1526 B/PK/PJK/2017Permanent Establishment adalah kegiatan yang bersifatpersiapanataupenunjang (preparatory or auxiliary)untuk kepentingan penduduk dan bukan kepentinganpihak lain; Bahwa hal tersebut juga ditegaskan dalam CommentaryOECD Model Tax Convention atas Paragraf 4 article 5yang menyebutkan:"This paragraph lists a number of business activitieswhich are treated as exceptions to the general definitionlaid down in paragraph 1 and which are not permanentestablishments, even if the
Register : 21-10-2016 — Putus : 23-11-2017 — Upload : 28-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 23 Nopember 2017 — Arfan Syafril, Lawan NSB Niderelbe Schiffahrtsgesselschaft MbH & Co.KG,
494530
  • Pengadilan).Bahwa Permohonan PenetapanPengadilan telah dikabulkan oleh PNJaksel dengan dikeluarkannyaPenetapan No. 203 /Pdt.P /2016/PN.JKT.Sel. tertanggal 14September 2016 (Penetapan PNJaksel No. 203/2016).Bahwa Pihak KetigamengatasnamakandenganPerseroanregistered at the Registrar of SouthJakarta District Court under caseregister number746/Padt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel (theCompany), in this matter the ThirdParty and the Company arerepresented by Hendy RizkiHasibuan based on Specific Powerof Attorney which
    dapatditarik kembali untukmengesampingkan, menarik, danmembatalkan setiap dan semuatuduhan, tudingan, perselisihan,perbedaan dan/atau klaim, langsungatau tidak langsung yang dibuat,sehubungan dengan setiap perilaku,pernyataan, tindakan, dugaangangguan, pelanggaran ataukelalaian di antara Para Pihakberkaitan dengan Perseroan, PerkaraPerlawanan atau hubungan komersialdan hukum lainnya di antara ParaPihak.PASAL 2PELAKSANAAN PERDAMAIAN(1) Perseroan bersamasama denganPihak Pertama akan mengajukanopposition which
    is basicallyintended so that the PN Jakselwould cancel PN Jaksel StipulationNo. 203/2016, which is registered atRegistrar of the South JakartaDisitrict Court registered under casenumber 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel dated 21October 2016 (the OppositionCase) between the Company (asChallenger) and dengan First Party(as Challengee), and at the time thisAgreement is drawn up, theexamination of the Opposition Caseat PN Jaksel is still ongoing.5.
Author : Rahmat S.S. Soemadipradja;
Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Keadaan Memaksa (Syarat-syarat pembatalan perjanjian yang disebabkan keadaan memaksa/force majeure)
806327334
  • adanya negosiasi di antara para pihak dalam perjanjian
  • But if the debtor would not have been liablein that hypothetic case because he would have been entitled to invoke forcemajeure, he now will not be liable either.For the Debtor's Account Pursuant to the Law(2); Use of ThingsWhere, in the performance of an obligation, a thing is used which is unfit forthe purpose, the resulting failure is attributed to the debtor unless this wouldbe unreasonable in view of the terms and necessary implication of the juridicalact from which the obligation arises, generally
    Internasional12/13/2010 11:40:20 PM 9 Rev3Final Setting Buku Penjelasan Hukum tentang Keadaan Memaksa.ingg 27but which appeared corrosive when used on aluminium.
    See art. 6:204 DCC regarding undue payment and art. 6:273DCC regarding the setting aside of a contract.For the Debtors Account Pursuant to a ContractThe second group of accountabilities is formed by contractual arrangements.As a result of the freedom of contract, the parties are free to decide which risksshall be borne by the debtor and which shall be borne by the creditor.
    Anabnormal illnesses however, for which this debtor is more susceptible thanother persons, will be attributed to him (no force majeure).The Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) has passed an interesting judgment regardingthe frequent case in which a professional seller delivers defective goods,whereas he did not produce the goods himself and is in good faith regardingtheir quality.
    In certain cases, the occurrence of force majeure can constitute anunforeseen circumstance, which allows the judge to alter the contract if one ofthe parties (here: the creditor) so demands.
Register : 16-08-2012 — Putus : 25-07-2013 — Upload : 27-11-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.46494/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 25 Juli 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11327
  • The classification of certain motor vehicles in this heading is determineo by certainfeatures which indicate that the vehicles are designed for the transport of goodsrather than for the transport of persons (heading 87.03)..."
Putus : 03-02-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 942/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 3 Februari 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. PINDO DELI PULP AND PAPER MILLS
5928 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memutuspermohonan Banding atas keputusan/ketetapan yang diterbitkan olehPejabat yang berwenang sepanjang peraturan perundangundangan yangterkait yang mengatur sedemikian";Bahwa Pasal 11 Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda antaraPemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Kerajaan Belanda,menyatakan:Ayat (1), "Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident ofthe other State may be taxed in that other State";Ayat (2), "However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which
    bungalainnya sebesar Rp121.958.100,00, dapat Wajib Pajak sampaikan halhalsebagai berikut:Bahwa Terbanding dalam tahap pemeriksaan melakukan koreksi positifobjek PPh Pasal 26 atas bunga yang diperoleh CVI GVF (LUX) MasterS.A.R.L. sebesar Rp121.958.100,00 dengan tarif PPh Pasal 26 sebesar10% dari jumlah bruto bunga yang dibayarkan;Bahwa Pasal 11 ayat (2) Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda antaraIndonesia dan Luxembourg, menyatakan "However, such interest may alsobe taxed in the Contracting State in which
    Itmakes plain that the State of source is not obliged to give up taxingrights over interest income merely because that income wasimmediately received by a resident of a State with which the Stateof source had concluded a convention. The term "beneficial owner"is not used in a narrow technical sense, rather, it should beHalaman 29 dari 40 halaman.
    For thesereasons, the report from the Committee on Fiscal Affairs entitled"Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Conduit Companies"concludes that a conduit company cannot normally be regarded asthe beneficial owner if, though the formal owner, it has, as apractical matter, very narrow powers which render it, in relation tothe income concerned, a mere fiduciary or administrator acting onaccount of the interested parties;Berdasarkan ketentuan pada paragraph 10, maka dapat disampaikan:Negara tempat
    YahyaHarahap SH, Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan,Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yangdijatuhkan merupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembanganhukum (law development), sehingga pada hakekatnya
Putus : 23-10-2015 — Upload : 16-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1572 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 23 Oktober 2015 — NINE AM LTD VS PT BANGUN KARYA PRATAMA LESTAR
49938515 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 1572 K/Pdt/2015in default in any material respect which such would affect theperformance by the Borrower of its obligations under this Agreement, andno event has occurred which, with notice or lapse of time or both, wouldconstitute such a default in the due performance or observance of anyterm, covenant or condition contained in any other agreement, contract orinstrument to which it is a party or by which it is bound or to which any ofits property or assets is subject, (iii) has not violated
    in any materialrespect any law, ordinance, governmental rule, regulation or court decreeto which it or its property may be subject, and (iv) has not failed to obtainand maintain in full force and effect any material license, permit,certificate or other approval or authorization necessary to the conduct ofits business.
    (d) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by theBorrower will not conflict with or result in a breach or violation of any ofthe terms or provisions of, or constitute a default under any agreement,contract or instrument to which the Borrower Is a party or by which theBorrower is bound or to which any of the property or assets of theBorrower is subject, nor will such actions result in any violation of theprovisions of Articles of Association of the Borrower or any statute or anyorder
Register : 03-02-2014 — Putus : 08-04-2014 — Upload : 05-06-2014
Putusan PN TABANAN Nomor 18/PDT.G/2014/PN.TBNN
Tanggal 8 April 2014 — PENGGUGAT : JORDANA RENEE LOREN / I G. A. R. FAJAR HARINI, S.H. - TERGUGAT : PETER FRANCIS MATTHEWS III
5824
  • Tbn; in which own an executorial power and bind to any other party.Halaman 5 dari 8 halamanSetelah isi persetujuan perdamaian tersebut dibuat secara tertulis tanggal 27 Maret 2014dibacakan kepada kedua belah pihak, maka mereka masingmasing menerangkan danmenyatakan menyetujui seluruh isi persetujuan perdamaian tersebut, Kemudian PengadilanNegeri Tabanan menjatuhkan putusan sebagai berikut:PUTUSANNomor: 18/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Tbn.
Author : Elly Erawati; Herlien Budiono;
Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Kebatalan Perjanjian
749121783
  • Salah satu isu dalamhukum perdata yang masih mengandung ketidakpastian konsep dan interpretasiadalah masalah kebatalan perjanjian. Ada beberapa faktor kebatalan perjanjianyang di ketahui adalah sebagai berikut :1.    kebatalan ... [Selengkapnya]
  • Instead of posingsuch a general validity demand, the new Code simply specifies a number offundamentalborders which the contracting parties are not allowed not cross:mandatory law, good morals, public order. A contract contrary to one of thesethree will, as a rule, be null (art. 3:40 DCC).2.2 Art. 3:40 par. 2 DCC reads: A juridical act which violates a mandatory statutoryprovision becomes a nullity; if, however, the provision is intended solely for the3.
    The article recognizes two kinds of exceptionsto this rule.The first exception concerns provisions which are intended solely for the4 In this contribution I mainly follow the English translation by Haanappel: Haanappel c.s., New Netherlands Civil Code, Deventer/Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation 1990.5 Parlementaire Geschiedenis van het Nieuwe BW (Parl. Gesch.
    a nullity would overreach itself.The second exception is found in art. 3:40 par. 3 DCC, which establishes thepossibility that a violated provision does not purport to invalidate juridical acts inconflict therewith. In such cases, the remedies mentioned in art. 3:40 par. 2 DCC donot apply.
    Together they embody theunwrittenfundamental requirements of human conduct, which are current ina certain society at a certain period in time.3.3. Art. 3:40 (1) DCC distinguishes the content of a contract from the necessaryimplication of a contract.Contentmeans: the mutual obligations of the parties,upon which they have agreed (e.g. the delivery of goods, the rendering of aservice).
    8.2 Specifically concerning annullabilities, the Dutch Civil Code introduces a fewmore inbetweensolutions.According to art. 3:53 par. 2 DCC, the court may, upon request, refuse to giveeffect to an annulment in whole or in part, if the juridical act has already producedconsequences which can only be undone with great difficulty.
Register : 03-06-2015 — Putus : 11-05-2016 — Upload : 13-10-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 339/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 11 Mei 2016 — KZI SINGAPORE PTE.LTD, lawan 1. PT. ASURANSI RECAPITAL, 2. PT. PUTRA SAMUDRA (dalam pailit),
321210
  • Jkt.Sel2.4.22011, 2.4 Addendum to Agreement No. : 01/PSKZIAI/2011Dated November 7, 2012 between the OBLIGEE and thePRINCIPAL which contract is inherent wthin this bondYang memiliki teryemahan bebas sebagai berikut:DISEPAKATI OLEH PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN INI,bahva kami PT. PUTRA SAMUDRA, Buaran Regency Suite 8 10, Jl.
    accesoir juga termaktub dalam paragraf2Advance Payment Bond dan paragraf 1Performance Bond,yang berbunyi sebagai berikut:Advance Payment BondWHEREAS PRINCIPAL has entered into a legal contract wththe Obligee for the cooperation and investment for building aconcentrator (Pembangunan Pabrik Pengolah Logam dariBahan Tambang (Concenrator) Proyek Pertambangan BogorBarat)by witten Agreement No : 01/PSKZI/II/2011, datedFebruary 23, 2011 and Addendum to Agreement No01/PSKZINV/2011, dated November 01, 2011 which
    Addendum to Agreement No. :01/PSKZIAI/2011 Dated November 7, 2012 between theOBLIGEE and the PRINCIPAL which contract is inherent wthinthis bondAtau dalam terjemahan bebasnya berbunyi :1... suatu perjanjian atas Pembangunan Concentrator Plantdi Sukamulih Kec. Suka Jaya, Kab.
    Jdika PRINSIPAL gagal untuk menyelesaikan pembangunanfasilitasfasilitas konsentrator (pililhan penuh) dalam jangka satu tahunsejak Addendum atas Perjanjian Nomor : 01/PSKZI/I/2011,tanggal 1 November 2011, Obligee berhak untuk mengklaim seluruhnilai BondPerformance Bond... firmly by these present that if the PRINCIPAL fails to fulfill hisobligation in the Performance of the contract which has been avardedto him under the OBLIGEE notice of award and which is to be laterconfirmed by a contract for Pembangunan
    Bogor Jabar, AgreementNo. : 01/PSKZI/I/2011 Dated February 23, 2011, Addendum toAgreement No. : 01/PSKZI/II/2011 Dated November 01, 2011, 2"4Addendum to Agreement No. : 01/PSKZI/1/2011 Dated November017, 2012 between the OBLIGEE and the PRINCIPAL which contractis inherent wthin this bond.Yang memiliki teriemahan bebas sebagai berikut:.
Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 08-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 173/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. PHILIP MORRIS INDONESIA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA dan CUKAI
7716 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Asal CuttillerSeperti disebutkan sebelumnya, dalam License agreement dinyatakanbahwa:"In consideration of the rights granted herein, Licensee shall pay to PMProducts a royalty for each of the products which Licenseemanufactures and sells pursuant to this Agreement.
    For each brand ofthe products, such royalty shall be that percentage of Licensee's NetSales Value for that brand which is specified in the schedule to thisagreement (Article 5.1 of License agreement)"Yang diterjemahkan sebagai berikut:"Atas hak yang diberikan, penerima lisensi harus membayarkan royaltikepada PM Product atas setiap produk yang dihasilkan atau dijual olehpenerima lisensi sesuai dengan perjanjian ini.
    All of thecosmetics are manufactured to M's formula from ingredients obtainedin the country of importation, with the exception of one for which theessential ingredients are normally purchased from M. How is theroyalty to be treated with respect to the imported ingredients?2.
    License shallmanufacture, and procure that any Authorized Manufacturermanufactures, the Products in strict accordance with the Specificificationsand shall not sell any Products which are not so manufactured. Licenseeshall submit to PMPSA or its designees each calendar quarter fairHalaman 31 dari 71 halaman Putusan Nomor 173 B/PK/PJK/2015samples of all Products that have benn manufactured and sold by itduring the preceding calendar quarter.
    PMPSA has at any time during the term of thisagreement the right to grant licenses and which are prootected by statute,at law or in equity in the territory and/or in the country of manufacture ofthe products pursuant to this agreement, if this shall be other thanterritory, including all registered and unregistered copyright and similarrights which may subsist or may hereafter subsist in work or other subjectmatter, right in relation to inventions (including patents and patentHalaman 32 dari 71 halaman
Register : 27-10-2010 — Putus : 11-02-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.43208/PP/M.XII/19/2013
Tanggal 11 Februari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
14134
  • The adhesivelayer is protected by an interleaving, wider than the tape, which is removed during aplication;Typical Properties : ThicknessPVC Backing 0.30 mmAdhesive 0.70 mmTotal 1.00 mmbahwa Majelis sependapat Pemohon Banding yang menyatakan bahwa Denso Strips On Roll ofUnvulcanised Rubber Bitumen Mix CPT 1000 PVC Black 100mm x 20m adalah anti korosi tapedipakai untuk melindungi pipa besi dari korosi (karat) untuk pipa minyak, gas dari modifiedrubber, unvulcanised seperti bitumen oriented compounds
Register : 16-11-2011 — Putus : 04-06-2014 — Upload : 29-06-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT-52925/PP/M.XIIA/13/2014
Tanggal 4 Juni 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
21278
  • Koreksi Akun 5998 (ekstra 5% IDTC) sebesar Rp3.099.401.059,00Menurut Terbandingbahwa dasar koreksi Terbanding adalah adanya objek Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 26berupa jasa yang belum dilaporkan dan disetor oleh Pemohon Banding, koreksitersebut berasal dari perhitungan ekualisasi dengan pos biaya di Pajak PenghasilanBadan yaitu atas akun nomor 5998 dengan mana akun ekstra 5% IDTC, dalamgroup reporting manual Cadbury disebutkan bahwa akun tersebut untuk mencatatall operating revenue and expenses item which
    value= SDC + IDTC + ORIIDTC = 20% SDCORI = 10% SDCbahwa yang dimaksud dengan purchase markup 10% menurut Pemohon Bandingadalah nilai ORI;bahwa dalam pelaksanaan uji bukti Pemohon Banding tidak memberikan dokumenyang dapat menjadi dasar pemisahan pencatatan sesuai formula tersebut;bahwa Terbanding mengacu pada penjelasan Pemohon Banding pada saatkeberatan sesuai Surat Permohonan Banding Nomor: 04/CADFA/2010 yangmenjelaskan bahwa akun 5998 adalah untuk mencatat all operating revenue andexpenses items which
    The term "royalties" as used in this Article also includes payments bya resident of one of the Contracting States for the use of, or the right to use,industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, but not including ships, aircraft orcontainers the income from which is exempt from tax by the other Contracting Stateunder Article 9bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan P3B tersebut di atas, pembayaran royalty kepadaperusahaan Warner Brothers Consumer Product Inc., yang berdomisili (TaxResident) di Amerika Serikat
Register : 24-06-2016 — Putus : 27-12-2016 — Upload : 23-05-2017
Putusan PN TANJUNG PINANG Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2016/PN Tpg
Tanggal 27 Desember 2016 — NICHOLAS MARK OGDEN( Penggugat) PT. BINTAN LAGOON RESOR ( Tergugat)
10233
  • Tpgberkaitan juga dengan VILLA HOUSE RULES VERSION 1.1.2016 yangmenjadi Objek perkara a quo;Pasal 1.1 PERJANJIAN INDUK Terjemahannya (kutipan):(kutipan):Resort means the resort Resor diartikan sebagai resorsituated in LagoiBintan known yang terdapat di LagoiBintanas Bintan Lagoon Resort which yang dikenal sebagai Bintanis owned,operated and Lagoon Resort yang dimiliki,managed by the First Party. dioperasikan , serta dikelolaoleh Pihak Pertama.Dari dan oleh karenanya adalah tepat sasaran dan cukup
    Kutipan Pasal Terjemahannya dalamTata Tertib Vila Bahasa Indonesia Management Company, in which such kepada pihak ketiga denganconsent shall not be unreasonably persetujuan tertulis terlebihwithheld or delayed. dahulu = dari PerusahaanPengelola in casu, Tergugatl,persetujuan mana tidak akanditahan secara tidak wajar.
    Tpg Kutipan Pasal Terjemahannya dalamPerjanjian Pengelolaan Vila Bahasa IndonesiaArticle 8.1: Pasal 8.1:Villa Membership shall be defined as Keanggotaan Vila harusthe Resort membership accorded to the diartikan sebagaiVilla and which may not be separated keanggotaan Resorfrom the Villa.
    Further, where such functionor party is intended to be held on anypart of BLR outside such Resident'sVilla, the theprior approval ofManagement Company must beobtained for such use, which approvalshall not be unreasonably withheld ordelayed. For the purpose of this Articlea function or party shall be deemed tobe any gathering of 8(eight) or morepersons.
    Kutipan Pasal Terjemahannya dalam Perjanjian Sewa Vila Bahasa Indonesiaditentukan.Article 13.2: Pasal 13.2:On termination of this Agreement by Pada pengakhiranthe First Party under Section 13.1, all Perjanjian ini oleh Pihakpayment which have been paid by the Pertama berdasarkan PasalSecond Party to the First Party shall 13.1, seluruh pembayaranbecome the property of the First Party yang telah dibayarkan olehand the First Party shall not be obliged Pihak Kedua kepada Pihakto refund any or all of
Putus : 06-01-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 478 K/Pid.Sus/2015
Tanggal 6 Januari 2016 — JAMES JOHN WYNNE
491546 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • and the press section, whichconfirms my companies position in bali have featured in 5 or 6 articles overthe past 18 month. am also able to put you in touch with the shareholders ofThe Canggu club.Furtheremore, since receiving your email below my Jakarta lawyers, as wellas local bali lawyers, have proceeded with both criminal charges, as well as acivil court case against Caroline Sandriany ang Gunawan Raharjo fordefamation, fraud and theftparticularly in regard to the Nunia Boutique Hotelasset in which
    and the press section, whichconfirms my companies position in bali have featured in 5 or 6 articles overthe past 18 month. am also able to put you in touch with the shareholders ofhe Canggu club.Furtheremore, since receiving your email below my Jakarta lawyers, as wellas local bali lawyers, have proceeded with both criminal charges, as well as acivil court case against Caroline Sandriany ang Gunawan Raharjo fordefamation, fraud and theftparticularly in regard to the Nunia Boutique Hotelasset in which
Register : 14-12-2009 — Putus : 30-11-2010 — Upload : 18-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1516/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 30 Nopember 2010 —
200122
  • Company (PT.NNT) adalah atas nama PT PukuafuIndah :Point 4.2 (Bukti P31)The loan money will bear interest at a rate per annum of 2 % (twopercent) above the Singapore InterBank Offer Rate from time to time forone hundred and eighty (180) days Eurodollars, which inter est will becalculated with quarterly rests, and from the time for calculation shall beand be deemed to have been added to and accumulated with theoutstanding balance of the loan money and shall itself bear interestaccordingly ;Terjemahan
    Put.No.1516/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Jkt.Sel.Indah will be jointly and severally liable for the repayment of the loanmoney and payment of Interest which will be affected by Instalments,cash for fall due at the time of payment of any dividend which becomespayable by the P.T. Company to Indah, an to equal the whole of suchdividend.
    Company to payNewmont the whole of each dividend to which Indah is estitled ;Terjemahan :PT Pukuafu Indah akan memberikan perintah yang tidak dapat ditarikkembali kepada PT.
    Company (PT.NNT) untuk membayar Newmontseluruh dividen yang menjadi hak PT Pukuafu Indah ;Point 4.5 (Bukti P34)To secure repayment of the loan money and payment of Interest asaforesaid in the Joint Venture, or a mortgage over all shares In the P.T.Company which it holds at the time of the first application for money, orwhich it subsequently acquires, and Indah will charge all dividends fromP.T.
    Company to which it is, or may subsequently become, entitle withrepayment of the loan money an payment of interest as provided toNewmont accordingly. Indah shall assign such dividends to Newmontaccotdingly.
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006
955319
  • Tentang : Pengesahan United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Anti Korupsi, 2003)
  • INDONESIALAMPIRANUNDANGUNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIANOMOR 7 TAHUN 2006TENTANGPENGESAHAN UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION, 2003(KONVENSI PERSERIKATAN BANGSABANGSA ANTI KORUPSI, 2003)RESERVATION TO ARTICLE 66 PARAGRAPH 2UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINSTCORRUPTION, 2003Reservation:The Government of the Republic of Indonesia does not consider itself bound bythe provision of article 66 paragraph 2 and takes the position that disputesrelating to the interpretation and application of the Convention which
Register : 04-03-2013 — Putus : 08-04-2014 — Upload : 30-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.51804/PP/M.VIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 8 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11322
  • itu;Pos 64.01 tidak mempertimbangkan apakah bagian upper berlubang atau tidak,asalkan Alas Kaki dimaksud memenuhi kriteria dimaksud butir 7.1 di atas, harusdiklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.bahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut :Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luar dan Waterproof footwear with outer solesbagian atas dari karet atau dari plastik, and uppers of rubber or of Plastics, thebagian atasnya tidak dipasang pada uppers of which
Register : 23-09-2013 — Putus : 04-02-2014 — Upload : 18-03-2014
Putusan PN BATAM Nomor 176/Pdt.G/2013/PN.BTM
Tanggal 4 Februari 2014 —
4625
  • Bahwa pada Perjanjian Kerjasama tertanggal 19 Januari 2011 tersebutdengan jelas terdapat Klausula Arbitrase ;Bahwa pada butir 15 dari Perjanjian Kerjasama tertanggal 19 Januari2011 aquo dengan tegas disebutkan sebagai berikut : Any disputearising out of or relating to this agreement, which has not beenresolved by negotiations within thirty (30) days from receipt by aparty of a notice of dispute from the other party, shall be settledexclusivey by arbitration before a panel of three (3) arbitrators
    The venue of any arbitrationbrougt pursuant to this Agreement shall be in Batam, and thelanguage, in which the arbitration shall be conducted, including allwritings relating there to, shall be in Indonesia and Chinese.Yang terjemahan resminya sebagai berikut :Apabila musyawarah tidak berhasil, maka suatu panel arbitrase yangterdiri dari 3 orang yang sesuai dengan peraturan arbitrase KamarDagang Internasional harus dibentuk dalam 30 hari sejak tanggaldimana salah satu pihak menyampaikan pemberitahuan