Ditemukan 546 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 24-10-2019 — Putus : 05-04-2021 — Upload : 19-07-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 864/Pdt.G/2019/PN Jkt.Brt
Tanggal 5 April 2021 — Penggugat:
SELFY
Tergugat:
1.PT. KEDOYA ADYARAYAdikenal juga sebagai RUMAH SAKIT GRHA KEDOYA
2.DR. HARDI SUSANTO, SPOG
3.DR. DORO SOENDORO
4.MENTERI KESEHATAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA
5.GUBERNUR DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA CQ. KEPALA DINAS KESEHATAN PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA
1197372
  • These zones occupymore than 50% of the inner cystic spaces of the tumour. In some foci,hobnail cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm are prominent. Significantnuclear atypia is present.Small focus suspicious for microinvasion is see (A42)Capsular surface remains intactFallopian tube is unremarkable.Smear slides: A high cell yield is seen. There are numerous aggregates,trabeculae or papillary clusters of epithelial cells, with closely packedhyperchromatic nuclei.
    These zones occupy more than 50% of the inner cysticspaces of the tumour. In some foci, hobnail cells with eosinophiliccytoplasm are prominent. Significant nuclear atypia is present.Small focus suspicious for microinvasion is see (A42)Capsular surface remains intactFallopian tube is unremarkable.Smear slides: A high cell yield is seen. There are numerous aggregates,trabeculae or papillary clusters of epithelial cells, with closely packedhyperchromatic nuclei.
Register : 09-03-2015 — Putus : 24-06-2015 — Upload : 31-08-2015
Putusan PN MAUMERE Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2015/PN Mme
Tanggal 24 Juni 2015 — - ZAKARIAS HERIANDO SIKU, S.T., MELAWAN POLITEKNIK NEGERI KUPANG, DKK
10442
  • These categories, referred to as typesof evidence, are listed below and defined and discussed in this section.e Physical Examinatione Confirmatione Documentatione Observatione Inquiries of the cliente Reperformancee Analytical procedures...Every audit procedure obtains one or more types of evidence.Whether or not confirmations should beused depends on the reliability needs of thesituation as well as the alternative evidence available.
Register : 24-11-2020 — Putus : 17-12-2020 — Upload : 17-12-2020
Putusan PT SAMARINDA Nomor 190/PDT/2020/PT SMR
Tanggal 17 Desember 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : TNB Fuel Services Sdn. Bhd., Diwakili Oleh : FRIDA IMELDA, SH & Rekan
Terbanding/Tergugat : Pemerintah Republik Indonesia cq, Kejaksaan Negeri Balikpapan
5481026
  • For purposes of the delivery schedule, Producer acknowledges thatTFSs requirements for Coal depend upon TFS receiving orders for Coal fordelivery to the facility described in Recital A and these orders depend in turn uponthe facility described in Recital A being despatched by TNB.
Register : 03-11-2014 — Putus : 11-02-2015 — Upload : 31-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1015 B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 11 Februari 2015 — PT. AMERO MITRA FILM vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
100164 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • cinematografi haruslahberdasarkan hanya nilai dari print film;Dalam komentamya, Komisi mengatakan bahwa:"The Committee concludes that the amounts paid by the buyers of theaudiovisual programmes in guestion in respect of a charge for broadcasting/distribution rights should be considered in the light of Art. 32(1)(c) of the Code.In this context, they should be regarded as eguivalent to payment for the rightto reproduce the imported goods within the meaning of Article 32(5)(a) of theCode;Conseguently, these
Putus : 14-01-2013 — Upload : 12-07-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1935 K/Pdt/2012
Tanggal 14 Januari 2013 — PT. ASURANSI HARTA AMAN PRATAMA, Tbk. vs PT. PELAYARAN MANALAGI,
11851431 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Applying the same principle, the judge in Belle of Portugal held that theelectrician's negligence did not defeat the plaintiff's right of recovery underthe policy;These case have demonstrated that if a fire has proximately caused loss,any negligence committed by the master or crew is irrelevant;Yang terjemahan tersumpahnya sebagai berikut:Pertanyaan mengenai apakah kerugian ataupun kerusakan yang terjadidisebabkan oleh kebakaran disebabkan oleh kealpaan dari nahkoda dan Krutetap di cover terhadap
Register : 30-08-2010 — Putus : 08-09-2011 — Upload : 21-11-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 405/PDT.BTH/2010/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 8 September 2011 — PT. BANK UOB BUANA ("UOB BUANA") X PT. ABDI RAKYAT BAKTI,Cs
307240
  • PS T.Whom These Present Shall Come, yang ditandaioleh Randhir Ram Chandra, Advokat/ NotaryPublik Singapore tanggal 29 Oktober 2008tentang keabsahan Pendaftaran Umum atasNotarial Certificate mengenai Merger Agreement14. Bukti T1 Dalam Intervensi 14 : Fotocopy dari terjemahan resmi MergerAgreement ;15. Bukti T1 Dalam Intervensi 15 : Fotocopy sesuai dengan aslinya terjemahanresmi General Lodgment Form tentangSupplemen ;16.
Register : 05-01-2017 — Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 135 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 — PT. PLN (PERSERO) KANTOR PUSAT VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
12490 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Application of certain treaty provision is not always warrantedbased on apparent circumstances, but these provision are onlyapplicable if the taxpayers is the ultimate, i.e. the real beneficiaryof the income; Back to back structure does not result inentitlement to treaty application, In that light it is not necessary toprovide for more precise description of the term "beneficialowner".
Putus : 20-06-2013 — Upload : 25-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2277 K/Pdt/2012
Tanggal 20 Juni 2013 — PT. Danareksa Sekuritas, vs Fil Yusra, dk
181236 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If we don't hear to the contrary within 24 hours we willassume agreement with these details;(Terjemahan bebasnya: "Mohon konfirmasikan kepada kami instruksisettlement anda, sesegera mungkin.
Register : 20-02-2019 — Putus : 19-06-2019 — Upload : 24-06-2019
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 25/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Sby
Tanggal 19 Juni 2019 — Penggugat:
NAZAR OSMAN
Tergugat:
1.PT. TRACTEBEL ENGENEERING INDONESIA
2.Auditor PT. TRACTEBEL ENGENERING INDONESIA
3.SUPERVISOR HRSG PT. TRACTEBEL ENGENEERING INDONESIA
15964
  • Loss of (discontinued) 2" LLM (International Business Law) furtherStudy Paid SGD$ 5,000=IDR 52,235,7511Footnotes:Basic Salary per month. is based on months IMTA, as the Contract has been no longervalid).2 10 months calculated from April 2018February 2019 based on the validity of IMTA3UU13/03 Pasal 794 Overtime calculations: 22" Feb 26th Sep 2016 ( 2hr/Day), 27" Sep 3 Oct 2016(Shr/Day),4* Oct 30" Nov 2016 (2hr/Day), Pasal 785 7 Months from April October 20186 These cost claims are not included in
Putus : 19-12-2016 — Upload : 31-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1734/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 Desember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. RIMBA HUTAN LESTARI
9059 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For these reasons, thereport from the Committee on Fiscal Affairs entitled "DoubleTaxation Conventions and the Use of Conduit Companies"concludes that a conduit company cannot normally be regardedas the beneficial owner if; though the formal owner, it has, as apractical matter, very narrow powers which render it, in relationto the income concerned, a mere fiduciary or administratoracting on account of the interested parties."b.
Putus : 05-06-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 926/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 5 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. COCA COLA INDONESIA
18890 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, it can bedifficult to determine what these expenditures havecontributed to the success of a product. For instance, it canbe difficult to determine what advertising and marketingexpenditures have contributed to the production orrevenue, and to what degree.
Putus : 25-01-2017 — Upload : 04-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 62 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017
Tanggal 25 Januari 2017 — PT REPUBLIK ENERGI & METAL VS ZAINAL ABIDINSYAH SIREGAR
725516 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The Borrower agreesfor the benefit of the Lender that the English courts will have nonexclusiveJurisdiction to settle any dispute including a dispute relating to noncontractual obligations arising out of or in connection with this Agreementand for these purposes submits to the jurisdiction of those courts";Terjemahan resmi:"Perjanjian ini dan setiap kewajibankewajiban nonkontraktual yangtimbul dari atau sehubungan dengan Perjanjian ini akan diaturberdasarkan hukum Inggris.
Putus : 30-12-2015 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2430 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 30 Desember 2015 — PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT DAN LEISURE (PT BALI RESORT DAN LEISURE CO., Ltd), Dkk vs ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI, pendiri PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BUAHAN
271218 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • arbitrase;32.Pasal 1.1 SIC Rules (Peraturan SIAC) telah ditentukan bahwa SIACmempunyai jurisdiksi menangani sengketa di hadapannya hanya apabilapara pihak dalam perjanjiannya telah memilih SIAC sebagai forumpenyelesaian sengketa, yang dikutip sebagai berikut:Rule 1: Scope of Application and Interpretation;Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes to the SIAC for arbitration,the parties shall be deemed to have agreed that the arbitration shall beconducted and administered in accordance with these
Register : 01-06-2015 — Putus : 30-09-2015 — Upload : 11-12-2015
Putusan PTUN PALANGKARAYA Nomor 10/G/2015/PTUN.PLK
Tanggal 30 September 2015 — HARAPAN WAHAI, S.SOS, MH, Melawan KEPALA BADAN PENGAWAS KEUANGAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN (BPKP) PERWAKILAN PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH
13574
  • These categories, referred to as types of evidence, arelisted below and defined and discussed in this section.e Physical examinatione Confirmatione Documentatione Observatione Inquiries of the cliente ReperformanceAnalytical proceduresBefore beginning the study of types of evidence, it is useful toshow the relationships among auditing standars, which werestudied in chapter 1, types of evidence, and the four evidencedecisions discussed earlier in this chapter.
    These relationshipare shown in Figure61 on page 172. Notice that the standardsare general, whereas audit procedures are specific. Types ofHal. 172 dari 202 hal. Putusan 10/G/2015/PTUN.PLKf.evidence are broader than procedures ang narrower than thestandards. Every audit procedure obtain one or more typesof evidence.
Register : 05-04-2021 — Putus : 23-02-2022 — Upload : 23-02-2022
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 338/Pdt.G/2021/PN Dps
Tanggal 23 Februari 2022 — Penggugat:
1.I Ketut Siandana
2.I Made Sutarjana
Tergugat:
PT. WIDJA PUTRA KARYA
210137
  • These amounts will be paid through PT WPK.DOCUMENTATIONThe documentation in respect of the above will be prepared by Kusnandar & Coand as necessary will be notarized.AGREEMENT OF BAPAK KARIThe above minutes have been agreed by Bapak Kari.TERJEMAHAN DALAM BAHASA INDONESIA OLEH PENTERJEMAHTERSUMPAHTANAH BAPAK KARITanah milik Bapak Kari yang disewa oleh PT WPK sampai dengan 2019adalah seluas 10,756 m?*.
    These amounts will be paid through PT WPK.DOCUMENTATIONThe documentation in respect of the above will be prepared by Kusnandar & Coand as necessary will be notarized.AGREEMENT OF BAPAK KARIThe above minutes have been agreed by Bapak Kari.TERJEMAHAN DALAM BAHASA INDONESIA OLEH PENTERJEMAHTERSUMPAHHalaman 165 dari188 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 338/Padt.G/2021/PN DpsTANAH BAPAK KARITanah milik Bapak Kari yang disewa oleh PT WPK sampai dengan 2019adalah seluas 10,756 m*.
Register : 24-06-2014 — Putus : 12-11-2014 — Upload : 12-06-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 1117/Pid.B/2014/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 12 Nopember 2014 — Pidana 1. ALCOCK JACQUELINE NINA alias MARIA MAFUTA ESTRELLA 2. OMORUYI JIM AGHAHOWA alias JOHN MARIOT alias JON B
310179
  • The company as also agreed tomake payment of this above amount within the stipulated period of time.Payment will be done Four time from the total amount above first $127,000 second $ 185,000 third $210,000 final payment $180,000.PutusanNo.1117/Pid.B/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst.This agreement was made these day, 02/11/13 in good faith by bothparties.e Bahwa benar pengiriman dengan file AN AGREEMENT tersebut berasaldari IP Adress 139.228.202.66 merupakan bagian dari poll IP Publikyang diberikan secara dinamis
    The company as also agreed tomake payment of this above amount within the stipulated period of time.Payment will be done Four time from the total amount above first $127,000 second $ 185,000 third $210,000 final payment $180,000.This agreement was made these day, 02/11/13 in good faith by bothparties.131e Bahwa benar pengiriman dengan file AN AGREEMENT tersebut berasaldari IP Adress 139.228.202.66 merupakan bagian dari poll IP Publikyang diberikan secara dinamis kepada pelanggan atas nama NENISETIAWIDATI
Putus : 11-04-2013 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 101 K/TUN/2013
Tanggal 11 April 2013 — YAYASAN WAHANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP INDONESIA (WALHI), dk vs MENTERI NEGARA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP REPUBLIK INDONESIA
4481719 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • These measuresshall include, inter alia, those designed to minimize to the fullestpossible extent : (a) the release of toxic, harmful or noxious substances,especially those which are persistent, from landbasedsources, from or through the atmosphere or by dumping ;teriemahan bebas : langkahlangkah yang diambil harusditujukan pada seluruh sumber pencemaran laut. Langkahlangkah tersebut antara lain, meliputi upaya untuk sejauhmungkin meminimasi a).
Putus : 09-06-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 210 PK/Pid.Sus/2014
Tanggal 9 Juni 2015 — dr. BAMBANG SUPRAPTO, Sp.B.M. Surg
589560 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • These problems are usually related to technical factors(ischemia, tension, poor technique, stapler malfunction) or patient factors(local sepsis, poor nutrition, immunosuppression, morbid obesity,radiation exposure).
Register : 10-07-2020 — Putus : 02-09-2020 — Upload : 16-09-2020
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 365/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2020/PN Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 2 September 2020 — Penggugat:
1.PT. Batik Air Indonesia
2.PT. Lion Mentari
3.PT. Wings Abadi,
Tergugat:
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha
1421488
  • The establishment of these two plusfactors creates a rebuttable presumption of pricefixing, which dependants can defeat with their ownevidence (Issues in the Third Circuit: Narrower isBetter...the Third Circuits latest Word on ConsciousParallelism and The Problem of Plus Factors in ReFlat Glass, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 1309, 2005, halaman 3);2) Bahwa Prof.
    The establishment of these two plus factors creates arebuttable presumption of price fixing, which dependants can defeatwith their own evidence (Issues in the Third Circuit: Narrower isBetter...the Third Circuits latest Word on Conscious Parallelism andThe Problem of Plus Factors in Re Flat Glass, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 1309,2005, halaman 3);Bahwa Prof.
Register : 29-09-2015 — Putus : 31-03-2016 — Upload : 28-06-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor : 244/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015/ PN Jkt Pst
Tanggal 31 Maret 2016 — MARIA ITANIA SETIAWAN, CS >< KEDUTAAN BESAR REPUBLIK SURINAME (The embassy of the Republik Suriname)
262220
  • di kutipdibawah ini:We herewth would like to repeat our request of witten official letter fromthe Embassy of the Republic of Suriname in Jakarta regarding of ourdismissal.....Terjemahan bebas dalam bahasa Indonesia adalah sebagai berikut:Kami (Para Penggugat) kembali meminta surat tertulis pemutusanhubungan kerja dari Kedutaan Republik Suriname ...Tanggal 10 April 2014, Para Penggugat sendiri kembali memohondikeluarkan surat pemutusan hubungan kerja sebagaimana di kutip dibawahini:The purpose of these