Ditemukan 812 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : agnes agoes adref agris apren agres agrie agreet agren agrey
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1037 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
38 — 23 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • To the extent that fonds ore then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promptly apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todak Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Paertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalide
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 26-10-2016 — Upload : 05-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1033 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 26 Oktober 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
46 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Heos, Yo the extont hat funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promplly upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Com.pany from the Badas Payment Account the amount of such invoiceporeuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6,26.2 Portamina and the Coutrastors shall agree
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 17-09-2018 — Putus : 12-10-2018 — Upload : 07-11-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 548/PDT/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 12 Oktober 2018 — Pembanding/Penggugat : Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT. Makassar Toraja Tour dan Travel PT Maktour
165 — 92
  • Both parties agree that in case of any dispute arising out of this agreementor its interpretation, the dispute shall be settled amicably through negotiation andfailing which the same shall be referred to competent court as per Saudi law inSaudi Arabia for decision which decision shall be binding on both parties.Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:"(8).
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Putus : 18-04-2016 — Upload : 16-08-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 97 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016
Tanggal 18 April 2016 — 1. PT. CIPTA TELEVISI PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA (PT. CTPI), DKK VS 1. NYONYA SITI HARDIYANTI RUKMANA, DKK
725 — 610 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The Parties expressly agree (i) to waiveHal. 56 dari 172 hal. Put. No. 97 B/Pdt.SusArbt/2016Articles 7072 of Law Nomor 30 Year 1999; and (ti) that mandateof the arbitrators duly constituted in accordance with the terms ofthis agreement shall remain effect until a final arbitration awardhas been issued by the arbitrators.
    The Parties expressly agree (i) to waiveArticles 70 72 of Law Nomor 30 Year 1999; and (ii) that themandate of the arbitrators duly constituted in accordance with theterms of this Agreement shall remain in effect until a finalarbitration award has been issued by arbitrators.Terjemahan tersumpahnya adalah sebagai berikut:Keputusan Arbitrase yang diberikan bersifat final, mengikat, dantidak dapat dibantah dan dapat digunakan sebagai dasar untukkeputusan atas itu di Indonesia atau dimanapun juga.
    The Parties expressly agree (i) to waiveArticles 70 72 of Law Nomor 30 Year 1999; and (ii) that themandate of the arbitrators duly constitued in accordance with theterms of this Agreement shall remain in effect untuil a finalarbitration award has been issued by arbitrators.Terjemahan tersumpahnya adalah sebagai berikut:Keputusan Arbitrase yang diberikan bersifat final, mengikat, dantidak dapat dibantah dan dapat digunakan sebagai dasar untukkeputusan atas itu di Indonesia atau dimanapun juga.
    The Parties expressly agree (i) to waiveArticles 7072 of Law Nomor 30 Year 1999; and (ti) that mandateof the arbitrators duly constituted in accordance with the terms ofthis agreement shall remain effect until a final arbitration awardhas been issued by the arbitrators;(Terjemahan tidak resmi: Keputusan Arbitrase yang diberikanbersifat final, mengikat dan tidak dapat dibantah dan dapatdigunakan sebagai dasar untuk keputusan atas itu di Indonesiadan dimanapun juga.
Pengadilan PN KOTOBARU Pidana Umum
Register : 21-05-2019 — Putus : 18-07-2019 — Upload : 11-12-2019
Putusan PN KOTOBARU Nomor 64/Pid.B/2019/PN Kbr
Tanggal 18 Juli 2019 — Penuntut Umum:
ENIZARTI, S.H.
Terdakwa:
1.Yuzi Azhar Panggilan Ozi
2.Syahrul Wadi Panggilan Wadi
56 — 26
  • li>
  • 2 (dua) helai baju Mansek warna Hitam;
  • 64 (enam puluh empat) helai celana lejing panjang warna hitam ;
  • 1 (satu) buah tas warna merah;
  • 1 (satu) buah tas warna cream;
  • 24 (dua puluh empat) helai celana shot warna hitam;
  • 35 (tiga puluh lima) helai Singlet pria warna putih;
  • 3 (tiga) helai baju Singlet merek Crocodle;
  • 61 (enam puluh satu) helai Celana merek LYDYLY;
  • 20 (dua puluh) helai Celana Hamil mama merek Pgut Agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1034/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
31 — 21 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • To the extent that fonds ore then held inthe Badak Poyment Account the Trustee shall, prompily upon receiptef notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Hodoak Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalde to
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 23-09-2015 — Upload : 22-04-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 85 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
Tanggal 23 September 2015 — WEN KEN DRUG Co.Pte.Ltd VS RUSSEL VINCE, dkk
607 — 320 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 85 PkK/Pdt.SusHKI/2015Article 6 ter(I)(a) The countries of the Union agree to refuse or toinvalidate the registration, and to prohibit by appropriate measuresthe use, without authorization by the competent authorities, eitheras trademarks or as elements of trademarks, of armorial bearings,flags, and other State emblems, of the countries of the Union,Official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warrantyadopted by them, and any imitation from a heraldic point of view(Negaranegara Peserta
    menerapkanketentuan tersebut, apabila penggunaan atau pendaftaransebagaimana dimaksud dalam sub Ayat (a) di atas tidakmenunjukkan kepada publik bahwa terdapat koneksi antaraorganisasi yang bersangkutan dan halhal yang berhubungandengan lambang, bendera, emblem, singkatan, dan nama, atauapabila penggunaan atau pendaftaran mungkin tidak untukmenyesatkan publik mengenai adanya koneksi antara penggunadan organisasi.).Article 6 ter (3) a) For the application of these provisions, thecountries of the Union agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 29-06-2012 — Upload : 17-05-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2973 K/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 29 Juni 2012 — PT PROMEXX INTI CORPORATAMA VS LEE KUM KEE (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED, DKK
145 — 78 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In the event of any dispute(s) arising under, out of or connectedwith this Agreement the parties hereto agree to refer such dispute(s) tothe Court of Arbitration in Hong Kong."Klausula tersebut di atas diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia olehAnang Fahkcrudin, Penerjemah Resmi dan Tersumpah berdasarkan SK.Gub.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 15-10-2012 — Putus : 23-10-2013 — Upload : 18-09-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 588/Pdt.G/2012/PN.JKT.Sel.
Tanggal 23 Oktober 2013 — INDUK KOPERASI KESEJAHTERAAN UMMAT - DEWAN MESJID INDONESIA (IKKU-DMI), melawan JP MORGAN dahulu bernama dan dikenal sebagai THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK,dk
142 — 86
  • Bahwa penjaminan yang dapat dilakukan hanyaterbatas pada Collateral Fund dan kedudukanTergugat sebagai Collateral Agentsebagaimanadisebutkan pada butir 5 huruf c di atas dinyatakan19secara tegas dalam Pasal 8 Depositary Agreement,yang menyatakan:The parties agree that they have requested the Collateral Agentto act as agent hereunder and that therefore the Collateral Agentacts solely as agent and not in its individual capacity, and allpersons having any claim against the Collateral Agent by reason
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 07-09-2018 — Putus : 19-12-2018 — Upload : 01-02-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 526/PDT/2018/PT.DKI
Tanggal 19 Desember 2018 — Ny.NOVITA MULYANI >< TAKESHI HAMADA CS
60 — 581
  • Hal ini sebagaimana telah DIAKUI dan DINYATAKANPENGGUGAT sendiri dalam SURAT TULISAN TANGAN SEPIHAK (BUKANPERJANJIAN) tertanggal 08 Junl 2016 yang dlbuat oleh dan aatas inisiatifPENGGUGAT sendiri dan TANPA PAKSAAN dari orang lain, yangmenyebutkan :"If the amount of damages caused by me to JL Jakarta Branch has beendetermined prior to each payment date of the below salary etc. agree that THRand Bonus and Monthly Salary and Compensation of 'employment termination forme shall be deducted for approbatedthat
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 30-07-2018 — Putus : 05-03-2019 — Upload : 31-07-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 554/Pdt.G/2018/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 5 Maret 2019 — Penggugat:
Kevin Thomas Davies
Tergugat:
1.PT Borneo Prima Coal Indonesia
2.Kirkham International Pte Limited
3.Adang Sudrajat
Turut Tergugat:
1.Yan Armin, S.H
2.Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Cq. Direktorat Jenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum
285 — 162
  • PositionThe Company will employ Davies in the position set out in item 1 ofthe Reference Schedule or in such other position(s) as Davies andthe Company may agree.".Item 1 Referenced Schedule :Position : Davies will perform the role of Operations Director of theCompany..Dengan terjemahan oleh Penterjemah bersumpah :2.1.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 26-09-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1022/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 26 September 2016 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
41 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • To the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promplly apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suehinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Com.pour from the Dodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,pursuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,6.2 Pertamina and the Contraetors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalde
Pengadilan PN MUARA ENIM Pidana Umum
Register : 14-03-2022 — Putus : 29-06-2022 — Upload : 04-07-2022
Putusan PN MUARA ENIM Nomor 137/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Mre
Tanggal 29 Juni 2022 — Penuntut Umum:
SRIYANI, SH
Terdakwa:
WAWAN OKTODI Bin HERI ASWAN PAUSI
32 — 0
  • coklat Merk RINI Mosleem kias;
  • 1 (satu) stel baju koko marna merah motif kotak kotak merk AMANAH celana Panjang sekolah SD warna merah;
  • 1 (Satu) helai baju kaos warna abu-abu tua dengan bertuliskan new York merk BLAST;
  • 1 (Satu) helai celanan PRAMUKA panjang Warna coklat;
  • 1 (Satu) Helai baju kaos Pendek Warna biru bertuliskan Monsters ukuran S;
  • 1 (Satu) Helai Celana Pendek Warna Biru merk;
  • 1 (Satu) Helai baju singlet Warna putih merk AGREE
Pengadilan PN SURABAYA Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Putus : 06-12-2016 — Upload : 18-01-2017
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 626/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby
Tanggal 6 Desember 2016 — JAP THOMAS SOEJATNO melawan PT. ASURANSI QBE POOL INDONESIA Cs
204 — 145
  • Tenlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeriharus dibatalkan dengan alasan Mahkamah Agung sendiri karena PengadilanTinggi salah menerapkan hukum. 022 nn nn nnn nen nn nn nnn mene nnnDalam Policy Nomor 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawah bagiantentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa all differences arising out of thisPolicy shall be reffered to the decision of arbitrator to be appointed inwriting by the parties in difference or if they cannot agree upon a singlearbitrator
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA TIMUR Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 06-09-2010 — Putus : 03-08-2011 — Upload : 01-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA TIMUR Nomor 405/PDT.G/2010/PN.JKT.TIM
Tanggal 3 Agustus 2011 — PT.SUPERIOR COACH lawan PT. WIRA INSANI Cs
185 — 77
  • In the event thatHalaman 23, Putusan No.405/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Tim.such dispute, controversy or difference cannot be settled withinthirty (30) days after written notice by one (1) party to the other(the Notice Dispute) both parties agree to submit the disputeto a Board Arbitration, conducted to the extent theaccordance with the Rules of Arbitration Procedure of theIndonesia National Board of Arbitration (BANI) by three (3)arbitrators.Terjemahan Resmi:Semua sengketa, pertentangan atau perbedaan yang
    melawan Sohandi Kawilarang yang intinyamenyatakan:Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasan MahkamahAgung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkanhukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/D0/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawahbagian tentang Conditions telah diasuransikan bahwa Alldifferences arising out of this policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the partiesin differences or if they cannot agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1035 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
37 — 16 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Feos. lo the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, prompily upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Bodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures te be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contraetors shall agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 29-11-2016 — Upload : 05-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1032 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 29 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
44 — 24 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Fees. lo the extent that fonds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, promplly open receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Padok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrastors shall agree
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 806/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
47 — 25 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Trusteeinvoices received by them from the Liquefaction Company on accountof LNG Processing Feos. lo the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustee shall, prompily upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrasters shall agree
Pengadilan PN SURABAYA Pidana Umum Penghinaan
Putus : 18-05-2015 — Upload : 23-06-2015
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 492/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sby
Tanggal 18 Mei 2015 — MARTO UTOMO, SEM.Agr
33 — 5
  • Surya Mitra Pertiwi bergerak dalam usaha Agree cultur produk dan developmentinvesment, atau memproduksi hasilhasil perikanan, pertanian dan pengembanganinvestasi, Tugas dan tanggungiawab saksi sebagai Direktur Utama adalah berdasarkanjob discription dalam ADART.untuk perinciannya apa saja saksi tidak lupa.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 05-12-2017 — Putus : 15-03-2018 — Upload : 05-04-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 760/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 15 Maret 2018 — PT.MULTI SELERA INDONESIA >< ANTON SUSANTO
184 — 72
  • Bahwa menurut butir 15.0 dalam Perjanjian Sewa aquo, tentang JamOperasional Normal, menyatakan bahwa :The Lessee Agrees to adhere to operational hour of the FOODAVENUE, Upon the occurrence of any event of default by the lesseewere the Lessee does not adhere to the full operational hour, thelessee agree to pay a penalty of Rp. 500.000, (five HundredThousand Rupiah) per day for each offence.