Ditemukan 136 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 08-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1373/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PLN (PERSERO) KANTOR PUSAT
8456 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1373/B/PK/PJK/201 7a right to participate in profits, interest from any other form ofindebtedness and all other income assimilated to income frommoney lent by the law, relating to tax, of the Contracting State inwhich the income arises;Tax Treaty dengan Korea:Article 11 (4) The term "interest" as used in this Article meansincome from debtclaims of every kind, whether or not securedby mortgage, and whether or not carrying a right to participate inthe debtor's profits, and in particular
    in which the income has its source, isassimilated to income from money lent;Tax Treaty dengan Australia:Article 11 (3) The term "interest" in this Article includes interestfrom Government securities or from bonds or debentures,whether or not secured by mortgage and whether or not carryinga right to participate in profits, interest from any other form ofindebtedness and all other income assimilated to income frommoney lent by the law, relating to tax, of the Contracting State inwhich the income arises
Putus : 26-05-2016 — Upload : 11-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2633 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 26 Mei 2016 — DEWI LARASATI, S.H., E. FERNANDO M. MANULLANG, S.H., M.H., ; WILLIAM DALE BREENLE Jr., MARTIN ROBERT ADRIEN LOUIS DESAUTELS, PT DFDL CONSULTING INDONESIA,
14890 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Miscellaneous Terms, huruf B menyatakan: This Lol shall begoverned by the laws of Singapore and if any dispute arises herefrom such dispute will be arbitrated in Singapore under SIAC (BuktiT1), yang diterjemahkan oleh Anang Fakhrudin, penerjemah resmidan bersumpah: Surat pernyataan maksud ini diatur oleh hukumSingapura dan jika ada perselisihan yang timbul, perselisihantersebut akan diputuskan melalui arbitrase di Singapura berdasarkanSIAC (Bukti T2);Halaman 22 dari 27 hal. Put.
Register : 25-06-2020 — Putus : 25-08-2020 — Upload : 27-08-2020
Putusan PA PANGKAL PINANG Nomor 261/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Pkp
Tanggal 25 Agustus 2020 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
7448
  • ae 5Os 855 ails & 9 jus j 2 Vs he SI J Jl aly zal el & allaitl a gad DLS thgisas MS abl 3533 GL JU arises) 59Q a gah wall oy wihres Dihalalkan bagi kamu pada malam hari bulan puasa bercampur denganisteriister! kamu; mereka adalah pakaian bagimu dan kamupun adalahpakaian bagi mereka. Allah mengetahui bahwasanya kamu tidak dapatmenahan nafsumu, karena itu Allah mengampuni kamu dan memberimaaf kepadamu.
Putus : 13-03-2012 — Upload : 21-10-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2562 K/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 13 Maret 2012 — ERLINA, dk ; YULIA YUSRIANI MUALIM
148122 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Jundral Thahir di Bank SumitomoSingapore dimana Pertamina menyatakanbahwa hukum Indonesia tidak begitu pentinguntuk perkara ini,oleh karena depsotionyaberada di Singapore pada Sumitomo BankLimited Singapore dan lebih lanjut Pertaminamenyatakan if it arises in any othercircumstances,its proper law is the law of thecountry where the enrichment occurred andwhere the place reciept (apabila timbulnyakewajiban ini karena sebabsebab lain makaproper law bersangkutan adalah hukum darinegera dimana memperkaya
Putus : 08-12-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1547/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 8 Desember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SEAMLESS PIPE INDONESIA JAYA
6532 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1547/B/PK/PJK/2016However, such interest may also be taxed in the Contracting State inwhich it arises, and according to the laws of that State, but if the recipientis the beneficial owner of the interest, the tax so charged shall notexceed 10% of the gross amount.5.
Putus : 24-08-2016 — Upload : 11-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 820/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT NAGAI PLASTIC INDONESIA
7053 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The firstcircumstance arises where the economic substance ofatransaction differs from its form.
Register : 06-01-2015 — Putus : 28-12-2015 — Upload : 04-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 06/PDT.G/2015/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 28 Desember 2015 — Tuan BUDI HARTO X PT. MULTILINE SHIPPING COMPANY (YML DIV),Cs
263112
  • The Carrier shall be underno liabilitywhatsover for loss off, or damage to, the Goods, howeveroccurring, if such loss or damage arises prior to loading on to,or subsequent to the discharqge from,the Vessel.Notwithstanding the foregoing in the event that any applicablecompulsory law provides to the contrary, the Carrier shall havethe benefit of every right, defense, limitation and liberty setforth in the Hague Rules as applied by this Clause during suchadditional compulsory period of responsibility
    The Carrier shall be under no liabilitywhatsover for loss off, or damage to, the Goods, however occurring, if such lossor damage arises prior to loading on to, or subsequent to the discharge from, theVessel.
Putus : 28-04-2014 — Upload : 25-03-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 278 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 28 April 2014 — HARVEY NICHOLS AND COMPANY LIMITED VS 1. PT. HAMPARAN NUSANTARA, DK
534306 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 278 K/Pdt/2013cerca Where a dispute arises concerning the main contract, thearbitration clause continues to be valid and binding, even if themain contract is void .......... ;Terjemahannya :Dimana suatu sengketa timbul menyangkut perjanjian utama,klausula arbitrase terus mengikat dan sah, bahkan dalam halperjanjian utama batal ..... ;3. Hukum Positif;UU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan AlternatifPenyelesaian Sengketa:a.
    Where a dispute arises concerning the main contract, thearbitration clause continues to be valid and binding, even if the maincontract is void....... "Terjemahannya:Dimana suatu sengketa timbul menyangkut perjanjian utama,klausula arbitrase terus mengikat dan sah, bahkan dalam halperjanjian utama batal ...;3. Hukum Positif;UU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif PenyelesaianSengketa:a.
Register : 18-04-2017 — Putus : 08-06-2017 — Upload : 14-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 913 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. NAGAI PLASTIC INDONESIA;
6441 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The firstcircumstance arises where the economic substance ofatransaction differs from its form.
Putus : 23-12-2015 — Upload : 18-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 877/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 23 Desember 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. SEBANGUN BUMI ANDALAS WOOD INDUSTRIES
5046 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, suchinterest may also be tmed in the Contracting State iniwhich it arises and according to the law of that state, butif the recipient is the beneficial owner of the interest thetax so charged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gossamount of the interest;Huruf a, mengatur bahwa tempat kedudukan penerimapenghasilan bunga (negara domisili) dapat mengenakanpajak atas penghasilan bunga tersebut.
Putus : 14-06-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1105/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT NAGAI PLASTIC INDONESIA
7950 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The firstHalaman 20 dari 27 halaman Putusan Nomor 1105/B/PK/PJK/20179.11.9.12.circumstance arises where the economic substance ofatransaction differs from its form.
Putus : 17-05-2017 — Upload : 20-05-2017
Putusan PT KUPANG Nomor 71/PDT/2017/PT KPG
Tanggal 17 Mei 2017 — - HARTINI MAHMUD, Cs. vs - ANWAR H. A. PULLO
3719
  • Olehkarena itu terhadap keterangan saksi hanya berdasarkan cerita atausaksi DEAUDITU maka para Tergugat (PEMBANDING) dengan tegasmenolak keterangan saksi untuk seluruhnya atau setidaktidaknya tidakGapat GIterin ia js nseee ese eee nn eee arises reenter5.
Putus : 15-12-2010 — Upload : 18-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1558 K/Pdt/2009
Tanggal 15 Desember 2010 — PT POLYPRIMA KARYAREKSA VS DAELIM CORPORATION
156192 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Schwebel, "International ArbitrationThree SalientProblems". dalam 17 Fordhann International LawJournal 599 (1994), halaman 606607:"..Where a dispute arises concerning the maincontract, the arbitration continues to be validand binding, even if the main contract is void"W.3Terjemahannya :"Dimana suatu sengketa timbul menyangkutperjanjian utama, klausula arbitrase terusmengikat dan sah, bahkan dalam hal perjanjianutama batal ... "Hukum Positif UU Arbitrase:Pasal 3."
Putus : 01-10-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1612 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 1 Oktober 2013 — PT. Prima Laksana Mandiri Melawan PT. Asuransi Axa Indonesia
15689 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa dikarenakan pokok gugatan Penggugat salah satunya bersumberdari Polis Asuransi Contractors Plant and Machinery, maka penyelesaiansengketa yang timbul harus selalu mengacu pada ketentuan polispolistersebut yakni:Butir 7 Conditions pada Polis Asuransi Contractors Plant and Machinery;lf any difference arises as to the amount to be poid under this Policy (liabilitybeing otherwise admitted) such difference shall be referred to be the decisionof on orbitrator to be oppoidted in writing by the parties
Putus : 23-12-2015 — Upload : 18-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 876/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 23 Desember 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. SEBANGUN BUMI ANDALAS WOOD INDUSTRIES
3323 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, suchinterest may also be tmed in the Contracting State ini whichit arises and according to the law of that state, but if therecipient is the Beneficial Owner of the interest the tax socharged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the goss amount ofthe interest.Huruf a, mengatur bahwa tempat kedudukan penerimapenghasilan bunga (negara domisili) dapat mengenakan pajakatas penghasilan bunga tersebut.
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 277 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
6131 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The immediaterecipient of the income in this situation qualifies as a resident butno potential double taxation arises as a consequence of that statussince the recipient is not treated as the owner of the income for taxpurposes in the State of residence.
Register : 17-11-2015 — Putus : 18-02-2016 — Upload : 14-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1149 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 18 Februari 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SEBANGUN BUMI ANDALAS WOOD INDUSTRIES;
4724 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, suchinterest may also be tmed in the Contracting State iniwhich it arises and according to the law of that state, butif the recipient is the beneficial owner of the interest thetax so charged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gossamount of the interest.Huruf a, mengatur bahwa tempat kedudukan penerimapenghasilan bunga (negara domisili) dapat mengenakanpajak atas penghasilan bunga tersebut.
Putus : 23-12-2015 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 871/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 23 Desember 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT SEBANGUN BUMI ANDALAS WOOD INDUSTRIES
4935 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, suchinterest may also be timed in the Contracting State ini whichit arises and according to the law of that state, but if therecipient is the Beneficial Owner of the interest the tax socharged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amountof the interest;Huruf a, mengatur bahwa tempat kedudukan penerimapenghasilan bunga (negara domisili) dapat mengenakan pajakatas penghasilan bunga tersebut.
Putus : 30-11-2015 — Upload : 16-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 852 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 30 Nopember 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. SEBANGUN BUMI ANDALAS WOOD INDUSTRIES
4120 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • diterapkanapabila terpenuhi persyaratan bahwa Dupoer FinanceBV merupakan beneficial owner dari penghasilan bungayang diterimanya.3) Ketentuan Pasal 11 P3B Indonesia Belanda mengaturmengenai pemajakan atas penghasilan bunga, yangredaksinya berbunyi sebagai berikut:a.Interest arising in a Contracting State and paid to aresident of the other Contracting State may be taxed inthat other state;However, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, suchinterest may also be tmed in the Contracting State iniwhich it arises
Register : 25-10-2012 — Putus : 25-06-2013 — Upload : 24-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 660 B/PK/PJK/2012
Tanggal 25 Juni 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PINDO DELI PULP AND PAPER MILLS;
4121 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Theimmediate recipient of the income in this situation qualifies as aresident but no potential double taxation arises as aconsequence of that status since the recipient is not treated asthe owner of the income for tax purposes in the State ofresidence.