Ditemukan 186 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 30-01-2013 — Upload : 12-07-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2255 K/Pid.Sus/2012
Tanggal 30 Januari 2013 — ROSMIWATI SIRAIT ;
2413 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • 210.000Bend GIP dia. 1/2 Rp. 288.000Kopling GIP dia. 1/2 Rp. 100.000Seal Tape Rp. 100.000Cleamp Saddle GIP 2 1/2 Rp. 270.000Dop dia. 50 mm Rp. 120.000Flange GIP dia. 50 mm Rp. 360.000Flange GIP dia. 100 mm Rp. 360.000Galian dan Pengelasan/ Digging and Welding (nstallation)Pengelasan Rp. 4.000.000Galian dan Pengembalian Bekas Galian Rp. 10.000.000Survey and Planning Rp. 4.805.010 Installation feeRp. 27.457.200 Terms and Conditions shall refer to Murphy Oil General Terms & Conditions Total value in words
    210.000Bend GIP dia. 1/2 Rp. 288.000Kopling GIP dia. 1/2 Rp. 100.000Seal Tape Rp. 100.000Cleamp Saddle GIP 2 1/2 Rp. 270.000Dop dia. 50 mm Rp. 120.000Flange GIP dia. 50 mm Rp. 360.000Flange GIP dia. 100 mm Rp. 360.000Galian dan Pengelasan/ Digging and Welding (nstallation)Pengelasan Rp. 4.000.000Galian dan Pengembalian Bekas Galian Rp. 10.000.000Survey and Planning Rp. 4.805.010Installation fee Rp. 27.457.200Terms and Conditions shall refer to Murphy Oil General Terms & ConditionsTotal value in words
Putus : 25-02-2013 — Upload : 26-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 153 PK/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 25 Februari 2013 — WEN KEN DRUG Co.PTE.LTD VS TJIOE BUDI YUWONO/BUDI YUWONO
6351237 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • CAPBADAK (dalam bahasa Indonesia, huruf Kanji, bahasa Inggris RHINOCEROSBRAND) SELAIN TERDAFTAR DI INDONESIA, JUGA TERBUKTITERDAFTAR DI 13 NEGARA LAINNYA yaitu:e Di Filipina: Certificate of Registration dikeluarkan oleh Director Buerau of TrademarksRepublic of the Philippines Intellectual Property Office dengan Nomor 42004000717, tanggal 28 Agustus 2005 dengan Nama Pendaftar Tjioe BudiYuwono (PENGGUGAT) untuk KELAS BARANG 32, dengan merekRHINOCEROS BRAND + CHINESE CHARACTERS & DEVICE(RHINOCEROS BRAND WORDS
    Nomor 153 PK/Pdt.Sus/201205, dengan merek the words RHINOCEROS BRAND & Chinese Characters& Device;Di AustraliaCertified of Registration of Trademark dikeluarkan oleh Register of TradeMarks Commonwealth of Australia Trade Marks Office dengan Nomor1019711, tanggal 9 September 2004 dengan Nama Pendaftar Tjioe BudiYuwono (PENGGUGAT) untuk KELAS BARANG 05 dan 32, dengan merekthe Chinese characters appearing in the trade mark may be transliterated asXI NIU and translated into English as RHINOCEROS;Di New
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 18-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 315 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
4633 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Inother words, the dispute of "form versus substance" should bedecided in favour of "substance"... The "substance" of the rightto receive certain yields has a dual aspect. The first is the rightto decide whether or not a yield should he realized i.e.
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 14-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 282 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
6436 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favourof "substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yieldshas a dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not ayield should he realized i.e., whether the capital or assets shouldhe used or made available for use the second is the right toHalaman 21 dari 31 halaman. Putusan Nomor 282/B/PK/PJK/2013dispose of the yield.
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 14-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 316 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
4739 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance should be decided in favourof "substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yieldshas a dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not ayield should he realizedi.e., whether the capital or assets should heused or made available for use the second is the right to dispose ofthe yield.
Register : 04-09-2019 — Putus : 25-11-2019 — Upload : 06-12-2019
Putusan PN PUWAKARTA Nomor 207/Pid.B/2019/PN Pwk
Tanggal 25 Nopember 2019 — Penuntut Umum:
TENGKU IMAM MULHAKIM, SH.MH
Terdakwa:
ELIANA LIFA
9477
  • Perumahan Pesona Jati IndahCibungur Rumah Type 30/60, type 36/72, type 45/90, type 54/104dan type 60/120 ; Bahwa pada saat jatuh tempo 14 (empat belas) harisetelah booking ada saksi tanyakan kepada Terdakwa tentangkepastian konsumen untuk mengambil rumah tersebut namunTerdakwa selalu. mengulurulur waktu) sampai akhirnya adabeberapa konsumen yang datang ke kantor pemasaran danmenanyakan tentang unit rumah yang sudah mereka bayarkanbooking fee maupun uang muka nya;= Bahwanalitdkn pe njaralannuran words
Putus : 25-10-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1718/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 25 Oktober 2017 — PT ELDERS INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
479 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sebagaimana dikutip dari PutusanPengadilan Pajak Nomor: Put49773PP/M.XVII/19/2013 halaman 38alinea 2 yang berbunyi: bahwa untuk mengetahui dengan tepat apa yangdimaksud Oxen, Majelis mengambil kesimpulan berdasarkan beberapareferensi sebagai berikut:a) Encyclopedia Britanica;b) http://av1611.com/kjbp/kjvdictionary/ox.html;Halaman 11 dari 38 halaman Putusan Nomor 1718/B/PK/PJK/2017c) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ox;d) http:/www.meriamwebster.com/dictionary/ox;e) http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/words
Putus : 30-06-2015 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 307/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 30 Juni 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
5339 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favour of"substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yieldshas a dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not ayield should he realized i.e., whether the capital or assets should heused or made available for use the second is the right to disposeof the yield.
Register : 03-01-2017 — Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 18-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 57 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SINARINDO GERBANGMAS;
7261 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favour of"substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yields hasa dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not a yieldshould he realized i.e., whether the capital or assets should he usedor made available for use the second is the right to dispose of theyield.
Putus : 31-07-2015 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 343/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 31 Juli 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BATU HITAM PERKASA
6439 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words, thedispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favour of"substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yields has adual aspect.
Register : 07-11-2017 — Putus : 26-01-2018 — Upload : 26-01-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 697/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 26 Januari 2018 — PT.BANK NEGARA INDONESIA (PERSERO) Tbk >< DEDI ROVIANTO CS
11478
  • Berikut ini kami salinan dariWarkat Debit Tersebut:i) PaninBank waEB, CelCheaue m0: Q7A361KCU CBD Pluit gyARA KARANG JELITA 1(0190583) ,Atas penyerahan cek ini bayarlah kepada atauOn presentation of this cheque pay or bearer Printed by PT Wahyu AbadiUang sejumlah Rupiah (dalam huruf)The sum of Rupiah (in words) Rea 5,000 , OCD, 000 Supervisor Cap Perusahaan Stamp Tanda Tangan / Signature;jangan motewati gars ini do nat write below this tne WOPLIGBSOLU"OSH838 4265005iba" OO #NolTujuhEmpat##TigaknamSatu
    (ima miliar Rupiah) sehubungan dengan transaksi jualbeli Tanahsebagaimana disebutkan di dalam Perjanjian Pernyataan dan Jaminan.Halaman 72 Putusan No.697/PDT/201 7/PT.DKI#NolTujuhEmpat##TigaEnamSatut# a . #) PaninBank waa Wa Sime ae aeKCU CBD Pluit MuARA KARANG JELITA 1(0190583) MUARA KARAIAtas penyerahan cek ini bayarlah kepada atau pembawa *)On presentation of this cheque pay or bearer Uang sejumlah Rupiah (dalam huruf)The sum of Rupiah (in words) Reat 5, 00D, OCO, 000. + Verifikasi Supervisor
Putus : 07-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1834/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT PHILIP MORRIS INDONESIA
8553 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1834/B/PK/PJK/2017sociis a literal translation of which might be a thing isknown by its associates embodies the singlefundamental principle that the context of a word governsits meaning;The ejusdem generis principle:Ejusdem generis may be literally translated as meaning ofthe same class and the principle may be stated thus:where general words follow particular words.
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1947 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
4744 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words, the dispute ofform versus substance should be decided infavour of substance.... The substance of theright to receive certain yields has a dual aspect.The first is the right to decide whether or not a yieldshould be realized i.e., whether the capital orassets should be used or made available for use the second is the right to dispose of the yield.Ownership is merely formal, if the owner is fetteredin regard to both aspects either in or in fact.
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1949 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
5832 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words, the dispute ofform versus substance should be decided infavour of substance.... The substance of theright to receive certain yields has a dual aspect.The first is the right to decide whether or not a yieldshould be realized i.e., whether the capital orassets should be used or made available for use the second is the right to dispose of the yield.Ownership is merely formal, if the owner is fetteredin regard to both aspects either in or in fact.
Putus : 30-06-2015 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 306/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 30 Juni 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
8156 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favour of"substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yieldshas a dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not aHalaman 19 dari 37 halaman. Putusan Nomor 306/B/PK/PJK/20152.10.11.yield should he realized i.e., whether the capital or assets should heused or made available for use the second is the right to disposeof the yield.
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1948 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
4818 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words, the dispute ofform versus substance should be decided infavour of substance.... The substance of theright to receive certain yields has a dual aspect.The first is the right to decide whether or not a yieldshould be realized i.e., whether the capital orassets should be used or made available for use the second is the right to dispose of the yield.Ownership is merely formal, if the owner is fetteredin regard to both aspects either in or in fact.
Putus : 19-11-2014 — Upload : 16-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 647/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 19 Nopember 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
18375 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words, thedispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favour of"substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yields has a dualaspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not a yield should herealized i.e., whether the capital or assets should he used or made availablefor use the second is the right to dispose of the yield. Ownership is merelyformal, if the owner is fettered in regard to both aspects either in or in fact OnHalaman 19 dari 36 halaman.
Putus : 19-11-2014 — Upload : 01-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 646/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 19 Nopember 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
7643 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favourof "substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yieldshas a dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not ayield should he realized .e., wnether the capital or assets should heused or made available for use the second is the right to disposeof the yield.
Putus : 14-09-2016 — Upload : 10-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1020/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 14 September 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
23080 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words, thedispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favour of"substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yields hasa dual aspect.
Putus : 22-12-2014 — Upload : 01-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 820/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 22 Desember 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. SINARINDO GERBANGMAS
6035 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In other words,the dispute of "form versus substance" should be decided in favourof "substance"... The "substance" of the right to receive certain yieldshas a dual aspect. The first is the right to decide whether or not ayield should he realized i.e., whether the capital or assets shouldhe used or made available for use the second is the right todispose of the yield.