Ditemukan 4 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 14-03-2019 — Putus : 20-05-2019 — Upload : 08-11-2021
Putusan PN DEMAK Nomor 48/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Dmk
Tanggal 20 Mei 2019 — Penuntut Umum:
DEWI INDRASARI, SH
Terdakwa:
MUHAMMAD RIZKI Als SALEHO Bin SARKAM
283
  • pidana yang dijatuhkan;
  • Menetapkan agar Terdakwa tetap ditahan;
  • Menetapkan barang bukti berupa:
    • 10 (sepuluh) bungkus plastik klip bening kecil yang berisi pil hexymer atau pil warna kuning berlogo mf @10 butir (total jumlah total 100 butir);
    • 1 (satu) bungkus bekas tempat rokok Gudang Garam Signature;
    • 1 (satu) unit handphone merk Evercross warna gold beserta nomornya 08978935090;
    • 1 (satu) buah tas punggung warna merah coklat merk fought
Register : 24-05-2018 — Putus : 04-07-2018 — Upload : 08-11-2021
Putusan PN SUKOHARJO Nomor 90/Pid.B/2018/PN Skh
Tanggal 4 Juli 2018 — Penuntut Umum:
RAHMAT HIDAYAT ,SH.
Terdakwa:
Eko Wahyu Septanto Als Kodok Bin Sayyidina Usman
707
  • 1 (satu) buah tas rangsel merk FOUGHT warna hitam kombinasi ungu yang berisi 1 (satu) buah Helm merk INK warna Brown/ coklat.
  • 1 (satu) buah Helm merk INK warna hitam.
Putus : 18-05-2016 — Upload : 30-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 26 PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016
Tanggal 18 Mei 2016 — 1. ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, DKK VS 1. PT AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, DKK
13831825 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 26 PK/Pat.SusArbt/2016stake in the reference which has (until now) been very hard fought at everystage. The issues were complex and the documents voluminous. TheTribunal see no reason to reduce any award for costs simply on the basisthat the amounts claimed are excessive;19.In principle, the Claimants should have their costs as the obviouslysuccessful party.
Putus : 26-03-2013 — Upload : 06-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 877 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 26 Maret 2013 — ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, dkk ; PT. AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, dkk
13111077 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • These are large sums but there large sums at stake in the reference which has(until now) been very hard fought at every stage. The issues were complex and thedocuments voluminous. The Tribunal see no reason to reduce any award for costssimply on the basis that the amounts claimed are excessive.19.