Ditemukan 9788 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 26-02-2020 — Putus : 17-03-2020 — Upload : 17-03-2020
Putusan PA SIMALUNGUN Nomor 274/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Sim
Tanggal 17 Maret 2020 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
1510
  • ) Juz II halaman 195196, yang telahdiambil alin sebagai pendapat Majelis Hakim sebagai berikut:S58) WE 95 Cee GlAlly AnlBYl y AULA g Abell aus Ayyalg Shall rau Ailzaal) bail diyCats by igiArtinya: Dan syaratsyarat hadanah itu ada 7 (tujuh): berakal sehat, merdeka,beragama Islam, bijaksana, dapat dipercaya, bertempat tinggal tetap/satutempat kediaman dengan anak yang diasuh, tidak bersuami/belum kawinlagi.
    Penggugat dan Tergugatbernama Salsa Amallia, lahir pada tanggal 16 Desember 2013, dikaitkan denganbukti P.2 dan kesaksian kedua orang Saksi yang diajukan oleh Penggugat dipersidangan, sebagaimana tersebut dalam bagian tentang duduk perkara, olehHalaman 16 dari 20 halaman Putusan Nomor 274/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Simkarenanya berdasarkan pertimbanganpertimbangan tersebut di atas, dan hanyasemata demi kemaslahatan serta untuk mengedepankan prinsip kepentingan terbaikbagi anak (the best interests of the child shall
    ditetapbkan sebagaipemegang hak hadanah (pemeliharaan) terhadap 1 (satu) orang anak PenggugatHalaman 17 dari 20 halaman Putusan Nomor 274/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Simdan Tergugat bernama 9M, lahir pada tanggal 16 Desember 2013,sementara dengan perceraian ini antara Penggugat dan Tergugat tidak mungkin lagiakan hidup bersama dalam satu atap sebagai suami istri untuk mengasuh anak aquo, maka demi kemaslahatan anak dan untuk mengedepankan prinsip kepentinganterbaik bagi anak (the best interests of the child shall
Putus : 11-07-2011 — Upload : 13-02-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 164/B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 11 Juli 2011 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK, ; PT. GREAT IPHOCK INTERNATIONAL,
3823 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali (semulaTerbanding) sangat tidak setuju dan keberatanterhadap pertimbangan hukum Majelis HakimPengadilan Pajak tersebut pada angka 1 di atas,dengan dalil dalil hukum sebagai berikut Bahwa Article 1 Persetujuan Antara PemerintahRepublik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Jepang TentangPenghindaran Pajak Berganda dan PencegahanPengelakan Pajak yang berhubungan dengan pajakpajak atas pendapatan menyatakan18"This Agreement shall apply to persons who areresidents of one or both of
    Jepang Tentang Penghindaran PajakBerganda dan Pencegahan Pengelakan Pajak yangberhubungan dengan pajak pajak atas pendapatanmenyatakanAyat 1"Interest arising in a Contracting State and paidto a resident of the other Contracting State maybe taxed in that other Contracting State".Ayat 2"However, such interest may also be taxed in theContracting State in which it arises, andaccording to the laws of that Contracting State,but if the recipient is the beneficial owner ofthe interest the tax so charged shall
    No.164/B/PK/PJK/2010Interest.Ayat 1"Interest arising in a Contracting State and paidto a resident of the other.Contracting State may be taxed in that otherState".Ayat 2"However, such interest may also be taxed in theContracting State in which it arises, andaccording to the laws of that Contracting State,but if the recipient is the beneficial owner ofthe interest the tax so charged shall not exceed10 percent of the gross amount of the interest".Terjemahannya.Bunga.Ayat 1"Bunga yang berasal dari suatu
Putus : 11-10-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1633/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 11 Oktober 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. YAMAHA MUSIC MANUFACTURING INDONESIA
5837 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In consideration of the technical and other assistance givenby YAMAHA to YMMI hereunder YMMI shall pay to YAMAHAthe royalty as specified below for the term of this Agreementand even after the expiration there of in case YAMAHAgrants YMMI the right to sell Guitars and Drums in promotionto total amount of Guitars and Drums that YMMI sold to itsbuyers including YAMAHA 2.0% (include tax) of the net salesof Guitars and Drums;2.
    Term of Agreement;Article24This Agreement shall continue in full force for five (5) years from 1April, 2004. Thereafter, it shall be automatically extended for oneyear each, unless either party shall give to the other party awritten notice of its intention to terminate this Agreement within atleast three (3) monthprior to the expiration of the term of thisAgreement;e.
Register : 13-11-2013 — Putus : 16-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-56166/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
14234
  • Undergone Any Operation There Other Than Unloadingand Reloading or any Other Operation to Preserve Them in Good Condition, bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A,Revised Operational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin ofthe ASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: ForThe Purpose of Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,Where Transportation is Effected Trough the Territory of One or MoreNonACFTA Parties, the Following Shall
    Undergone Any OperationThere Other Than Unloading and Reloading or any Other Operation to PreserveThem in Good Condition.bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A, RevisedOperational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin of theASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: For The Purposeof Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, WhereTransportation is Effected Trough the Territory of One or More NonACFTA Parties,the Following Shall
Register : 29-03-2011 — Putus : 15-09-2011 — Upload : 14-11-2011
Putusan PN MATARAM Nomor 34/PDT.G/2011/PN.MTR
Tanggal 15 September 2011 — I KADEK BUDIARTA VS MARCEL DE RIJK ALIAS MDR.DK
8323
  • Bahwa hal tersebut diatur dalam poin6 yaitu) : DCA Bali shall sell the villas via thecompany sales office property gallery and be paid asales commission of 5% of the gross sale price of eachvilla sold from the project.Bahwa dalam terjemahan bebas yaitu) sebagai berikutDCA Bali akan menjual villa melalui galeri penjualanPut.kantor perusahaan properti dan dibayar komisi penjualansebesar 5% dari harga jual kotor masing masing villadijual dari proyek.3.
Putus : 31-05-2012 — Upload : 22-03-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 343 K/TUN/2011
Tanggal 31 Mei 2012 — Drs. ALBERT LASI, SH vs KEPALA KANTOR PERTANAHAN OGAN ILIR , dk
3019 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • acceptance in Europe by the end of the nineteenthcentury ;From the nullum crimen maxim jurists have deduced the priciple of prohibition ofretrospective penal laws, Aw early as 1651, Hobbes wrote :No law, made after a fact done, can make it a crime ...For before the law, there isno transgression of the law ;This principle was stated in 1789 in Article 1, section 9 (3) of the AmericaConstitution which prohibited ex post facto laws, Article 7 of the EuropeanConvention on Human Right provides that no one shall
    Article 7 includes the important proviso thait....shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act oromission ;Which, at the time when it was comited, was criminal accoding to the generalprinciples of law recognised by civilized nations ;Article 15 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states, interalia ;No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on occount of any act oromission which did not constitute a criminal affence, under national orinternational
    law, at the time when it was commited ;Article 15 includes a proviso identical to that contained an article 7 of theeuropean Comvention on Human Rights execep that the pharase civilizednations is replaced by the comunity of nations ;In 1985, the succesful Australian Bill of Rights Bill includeed a proposed Article28 whict provided, inter alia ;No person shall be convicted of any criminal affence on account of any act oromission whict did not constitute a criminal affence at the time when it accurred
Putus : 21-11-2011 — Upload : 18-09-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2686 K/PID.SUS/2010
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2011 — ONG HO PHIN alias EDI
9250 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Howeveractual use of trademark shall not be a condition for filling of application ofregistration. An application shall not be refused solely on the ground thatintended to use has not taken place before of the expiry of a period of threeyears from the date of application ;Terjemahan :Hal. 21 dari 26 hal. Put. No. 2686 K/PID.SUS/2010Negara Anggota boleh membuat kemampuan pendafiaran merekberdasarkan penggunaan.
    Namun, penggunaan secara aktual dari merektidak harus menjadi persyaratan untuk pengajuan permohonan pendaftaran.Suatu permohonan pendaftaran tidak akan ditolak sematamata berdasarkankehendak untuk menggunakan merek belum dilakukan sebelum berakhirnyajangka waktu 3 (tiga) tahun dari tanggal pengajuan pendaftaran ;Article 16:The owner of registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to preventall third parties ...
    The rights described above shall not prejudice any existingprior right, nor shall they affect the possibility of members making rightsavailable on the basis of use ;Terjemahan :Pemilik Merek terdaftar memiliki hak eksklusif untuk mencegah pihak ketigalainnya ... hak yang digambarkan di atas, tidak akan merugikan hak yangtelah ada terlebih dahulu, juga tidak berpengaruh terhadap kemungkinannegara anggota yang perolehan haknya disediakan berdasarkanpenggunaan (bukan pendaftaran : catatan penulis) ;
Register : 02-07-2018 — Putus : 21-11-2018 — Upload : 25-06-2020
Putusan PA DENPASAR Nomor 277/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Dps.
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
2210
  • shall Gpbied Ge GUN alli Dey!
Register : 12-01-2015 — Putus : 11-06-2015 — Upload : 08-03-2016
Putusan PA TULUNGAGUNG Nomor 306/Pdt.G/2015/PA.TA
Tanggal 11 Juni 2015 — Pemohon Termohon
90
  • yang sah dan tidak ternyata ketidak hadirannya tersebut disebabkanoleh sesuatu alasan yang sah menurut hukum, oleh karenanya harusdinyatakan Termohon tidak hadir dan sesuai dengan Pasal 125 HIR perkara inidapat diperiksa dan diputus tanpa hadirnya Termohon (verstek) dan sesuaipula dengan kaidah hukum Islam yang tercantum dalam kitab Al Anwar Juz IIhalaman 55 yang kemudian diambil alin sebagai pendapat Majelis Hakim yangberbunyi sebagai berikut :Artiny TTR em eb aT ee ee om Le me oe Me ml DL eede shall
    Adal ae Welw, il te pA Gla dz eddlc shall Aull yg gel & a jhe og A hao plas) ptememutus gugatan tersebutMenimbang, bahwa permohonan Pemohon pada pokoknya mohonkepada Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung agar diberi izin untuk menjatukantalak satu raj terhadap Termohon dengan alasan Termohon pergimeninggalkan Pemohon dan tidak diketahui tempat tinggalnya sejak bulanJanuari 2013 sampai sekarang tidak ada kabar berita dan tidak diketahuitempat tinggalnya;Menimbang, bahwa Termohon pergi tanpa ijin dan selama
Register : 20-09-2018 — Putus : 27-11-2018 — Upload : 08-01-2019
Putusan PA BUOL Nomor 140/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Buol
Tanggal 27 Nopember 2018 — PENGGUGAT Melawan TERGUGAT
2710
  • Dalil syar'i dalam Kitab Madaa Hurriyatuz Zaujaini fith Thalaaq Juz halaman 83, yang kemudian diambil alih sebagai pendapat majelis hakimsebagai berikut:Lgad bis ea aly Gamo Stl Shall qo peut Gam Gall ali aly!
Putus : 19-09-2017 — Upload : 21-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 874 K/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2017
Tanggal 19 September 2017 — DART INDUSTRIES, Inc VS 1. PT CAHAYA MULIA NUSANTARA, DKK
6561282 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • (World Trade Organization WTO);Bahwa ketentuan trips berlaku secara universal dan wajibdiimplementasikan oleh setiap negara anggota WTO, termasuk Indonesia;berdasarkan hal di atas, mengacu pada Pasal 25 ayat (1) Trips, dalammenentukan kebaruan dan ataupun persamaan satu desain industri dengandesain industri lainnya, haruslah diperhatikan adanya perbedaan signifikandari desaindesain tersebut. berikut adalah kutipan dari ketentuan Pasal 25ayat (1) TRIPs;Pasal 25 ayat (1) Perjanjian TRIPs:"members shall
    provide for the protection of independently created industrialdesigns that are new or original. members may provide that designs are notnew or original if they do not significantly differ from known designs orcombinations of known design features. members may provide that suchprotection shall not extend to designs dictated essentially by technical orfunctional considerations" ;Terjemahan bebasnya:"Anggota wajib memberikan perlindungan desain produk industri yang baruatau asli.
    Bahwaketentuan Pasal 25 ayat (1) TRIPs sebagai berikut:Pasal 25 ayat (1) Perjanjian TRIPs :"Members shall provide for the protection of independently createdindustrial designs that are new or original. Members may provide thatdesigns are not new or original if they do not significantly differ fromknown designs or combinations of known design features.
    Members mayprovide that such protection shall not extend to designs dictatedessentially by technical or functional considerations";Terjemahan bebasnya:"Anggota wajib memberikan perlindungan desain produk industri yangbaru atau asli. Anggota dapat menetapkan bahwa desain tidak baru atauasli jika mereka tidak secara signifikan berbeda dari desain ataukombinasi dari fitur desain dikenal.
    Nomor 874 K/Pdt.SusHKI/2017 mengenai pengertian "tidak sama"sebagaimana dimaksud dalamPasal 2 ayat (2) Undang UndangDesain Industriperaturan perundangundanganyang menjelaskan mengenaipengertian "tidak sama" makaMahkamah Agung berpedomanpada Pasal 25 ayat (1) TRIPs yangberbunyi:"Members shall provide for theprotection of independentlycreated industrial designs that arenew or original.
Register : 21-04-2017 — Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 22-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 265/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — AMIN bin HALIM RASIP Lawan H. NALDI NAZAR HAROEN,S.H., Dk
204162
  • Bahwa sesuai perjanjian Memorandum of Aggreement yangditandatangani baik oleh Penggugat dan Para Tergugat padatanggal 15 oktober 2015 yang tertuang dalam point 25 sebagaiberikut :this moa will be effective only once payment isreceived and shall governed by and construed inaccordance wth indonesian lawand shall continue toremain valid for 10 yearsTerjemahan BebasMoa ini akan efektif hanya setelah pembayaranditerima dan diatur oleh dan ditafsirkan sesuaidengan hukum indonesia dan akan tetap berlakuselama
    Bahwa sesuai perjanjian Memorandum of Aggreement yangditandatangani baik oleh Penggugat dan Para Tergugat padatanggal 15 oktober 2015 yang tertuang dalam point 25 sebagaiberikut :this moa will be effective only oncepayment is received and shall governed byand construed in accordance withHal 15 dari 26 Hal Putusan No.265/Pat.G/2017/PN Jkt.Selindonesian law and shall continue toremain valid for 10 yearsTerjemahan BebasMoa ini akan efektif hanya setelahpembayaran diterima dan diatur oleh danditafsirkan
Putus : 26-03-2014 — Upload : 24-03-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3277 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 26 Maret 2014 — BRlAN LEE SKINNER, DK. VS. AGUS ERMAWAN
7041 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan;Bahwa selain itu Tergugat Il juga berkedudukan di Jakarta Selatan,dalamlingkup kewenangan Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan.Pasal 118 ayat 4 HIR:jika dengan surat akte tempat telah di pilih,maka si Penggugat kalau maudapat memasukan gugatannya kepada Ketua Pengadilan Negeri yangdalam daerah hukumnya tempat diam yang dipilih itu terletak.Article 14.3 Cooperation Agreement:in case of faliure to attain amicable resolition, then all disputes arising inrelation to this agreement shall
    Tergugat ll Dengan demikian sebagai perseroanterbatas yang tunduk pada ketentuan UndangUndang Nomor 40 Tahun2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (vide Pasal 66 ayat 3 UndangUndangPerseroan Terbatas) dan ketentuan hukum perusahaan = yangberlaku,Tergugat Il, wajib membuat laporan keuangan,sehingga keluarmasuknya keuangan dari rekening Tergugat Il, termasuk sehubungandengan bisnis pelatihan berdasarkan Agreement transparan dan dapat dipertanggung jawabkan.Article 2.3 Cooperation Agreement:ALL payments shall
    be made to the account in favour of the SecondParty to Match Consulting International wth bank BCA Account Nomor0063103606.Terjemahan resminya:Pasal 2 ayat Agreement:Semua pembayaran harus di lakukan atas nama pihak ke dua KepadaMatch Consulting International di rekening BCA Account Nomor 0063103606.Article 2.3 Cooperation Agreement :ALL payments shall be made to the account in favor of the Second Partyto Match Consulting international wth Bank BCA Account Nomor 0063103606.Article 7.3 Cooperation
    Agreement :Every revenue or invoic relating to this cooperation scope shall bedirecteli creditted to the account of match Consulting International wthbank BCA No: 0063103606 and every payment shall also be talkenfrom such account.Hal. 4 dari 44 hal.
    sebagai modal kewajiban sebesarRp500.000.000,00 (lima ratus juta rupiah) ke Rekening Tergugat Il di BankCentral Asia (BCA) dengan nomor 0063013606 dan baik Tergugat maupun Tergugat Il tidak pernah mau dikonfirmasi mengenai hal itu (videBukti P1);Articel 2.1 Cooperation Agreement.For the training division activities as referred to in Article 1, the partieshereto agre to equally (50:50) assume the capital required namelyamounting to Rp1.000.000.000,00 (one billion rupiah),of wch anotheracounting shall
Register : 21-09-2020 — Putus : 29-12-2021 — Upload : 03-01-2022
Putusan PN BATAM Nomor 263/Pdt.G/2020/PN Btm
Tanggal 29 Desember 2021 — Penggugat:
PT. KARYA INDO BATAM
Tergugat:
OXLEY BATAM PTE LTD
Turut Tergugat:
PT OXLEY KARYA INDO BATAM
418284
  • This agreement, the interpretation and theimplementation and any result incurred hereof, shall bestipulated and subject to the laws of the Republic ofIndonesia;17. HUKUM YANG BERLAKU DAN BAHASA;17.1 Hukum.
    This agreement, the interpretation and the implementationand any result incurred hereof, shall be stipulated and subject tothe laws of the Republic of Indonesia;17.2. Language.
    The Parties agree that in the event thatoccurrence of disputes in respect of this Agreement,including but not limited to matters regarding to theexistence, validity, performance of the rights and obligationsof the Parties, the Parties shall settle the disputes throughthe Arbitration to be held in Singapore in accordance withthe Arbitration Rules of the Singapore InternationalArbitration Centre.
    In particular, the place of Arbitration shallHalaman 16 dari 46 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 263/Pdt.G/2020/PN Btmbe in Singapore and the language of the arbitration shall bein Indonesia. The Arbitration panel shall consist of threeArbitrators. One to be appointed by KIB and Oxley and thethird to be appointed by the two arbitrators selected by theParties;18.2 Resolution.
    Award of the arbitration shall be final andbinding and after which there shall no legal proceeding offurther dispute (perlawanan), appeal or cassation.;Berikut terjemahan bebasnya dalam Bahasa Indonesia:"18. PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA;18.1 Yurisdiksi.
Upload : 01-06-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2353 K/PDT/2010
PT. ISTANA ARGO KENCANA; PT. PHILIPS INDONESIA
4531 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • berikut:"Without limitation to the rights of the Principal under clause 2.2, theDistributor further acknowledges that the Principal or a PhilipsAssociated Company (or another distributor appointed by thePrincipal or a Philips Associated Company) may sell any of theProducts directly to customers in the Territory in the followingcircumstances:(bo) Selected Customers of the Principal or a Philips AssociatedCompany or of another distributor which are specificallymentioned in Annex A (which Principal shall
    The Distributor shall refrain from activelyselling or assisting in selling the Products to the SelectedCustomers mentioned in Annex A."
    No. 2353 K/Pdt/201014.15:Disebutkan dengan tegas dalam Pasal 6.1 Distribution AgreementNo. 031/Leg/C/II/05 (Vide Bukti T 3)"(a) The Distributor shall use its best efforts to generate maximumexposure and high profile publicity of the Products in theTerritory to achieve awareness of the Products within theTerritory, subject always to full compliance with the instructionsand directions of the Principal for any publicity campaignundertaken by the Distributor.(6) = The Distributor shall at all times diligently
Putus : 22-12-2015 — Upload : 17-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2691 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 22 Desember 2015 — PT PERTAMINA HULU ENERGI RAJA TEMPIRAI VS PT GOLDEN SPIKE ENERGY INDONESIA,
304207 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • compensatethe Sole Risk Party, with respect to such sole Risk Party Operations,bby delivering to such sole risk Party a quantity of Petroleum andencumberances subject to the obligation to supply domestic market.Such deliveries shall continue until such time as the value of allpetroleum so delivered equals the amount due from such NonSole RiskPary which shall be equal to the total cost of drilling, completing, andequipping the Sole Risk well plus three hundreds percents (300%) (inthe case of a Sole
    PSC Blok Raja tersebut diatursebagai berikut:disputes, if any, arising between Pertamina and contractor relating tothis contract or the interpretation and performance of any of the clausesof this contract, and which cannot be settled amicably, shall beHal. 25 dari Hal. 57 Put. Nomor 2691 K/Pdt/2015submitted to the decision of arbitration.
    Pertamina on the one hand andContractor on the other hand shall each appoint one arbitrator and soadvise the other Party and these two arbitrators will appoint a third. Ifeither party fails to appoint an arbitrator within thirty (30) days afterreceipt of a written request to do so, such arbitrator shall, at the requestof the other party, if the Parties do not otherwise agree, be appointed bythe President of the International Chamber of Commerce.
    If the first twoarbitrators appointed as aforesaid fail to agree on a third within thirty(30) days following the appointment of the second arbitrator, the thirdarbitrator shall, if the Parties do not otherwise agree, be appointed, atthe request of either Party, by the President of the InternationalChamber of Commerce.
    Hal ini sesuai ICC RulesArticle 4 Request for Arbitration, subarticle 3:The request shall, inter alia, contain the following information:d. the relevant agreements and, in particular, the arbitration agreement;Terjemahan bebas Bahasa Indonesia:Permohonan harus, antara lain, memuat informasi sebagai berikut:Hal. 33 dari Hal. 57 Put. Nomor 2691 K/Pdt/201519.20.21.22.d.
Register : 25-11-2013 — Putus : 15-04-2014 — Upload : 19-06-2014
Putusan PA SUKOHARJO Nomor 1225/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Skh
Tanggal 15 April 2014 — Perdata
101
  • Pasal 133 Kompilasi HukumIslam sehingga hubungan keduanya sudah tanpa ruh lagi, oleh karena ituberdasarkan kaidah hukum Islam yang tercantum dalam Kitab Hurriatuz Zaujainifith Thalaq Juz I halaman 83 yang sekaligus diambil alih sebagai pendapat MajelisHakim, yang berbunyi : +o oon nn nnn nnn enn enn nnnCel Luca Lgad ably tea all Como Sl) Shall qi peuad Cue grUbll allel plu! Lis!
Register : 15-01-2020 — Putus : 17-02-2020 — Upload : 26-08-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 465 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 17 Februari 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
17041 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Theconstituent material of the outer sole for purposes of classification shall be taken to be thematerial having the greatest surface area in contact with the ground.
    In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
    For the purposes of this Chapter :(a) the terms rubber and * plastics include woven fabrics or other textile products with anextemal layer of rubber or pleatics being visible to the naked eye; for the purpose of thisprovision, no account should be taken of any resulting change of colour; and(6) the term leather refers to the goods of headings 41.07 and 41.12 to 41.14.4, Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter :(a The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestexternal
    surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet Stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestsurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch as spikes, bars, nails, protectors or similar attachments.diketahuidimaksud dengan Waterproof Footwear mempersyaratkan 2 (dua)i.
Register : 02-06-2017 — Putus : 19-07-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1218 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 19 Juli 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs BUT BANGKOK BANK PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED;
140114 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pemohon Banding tidak setuju dengan pendapat Peneliti yangmenyatakan bahwa alasan Pemohon Banding tidak tepat dan tidak relevankarena seharusnya yang relevan untuk dilihat adalah ketentuan yangmerujuk pada hak pemajakan Negara cumber sesuai "article 11 angka 2huruf a P3B yaitu sebagai berikut :However, In the case of Indonesia, such interest arising in Indonesia maybe taxed in Indonesia according to the laws of Indonesia, but if the recipientis the beneficial owner of the interest, the tax so charged shall
    (Terbanding)berpendapat bahwa alasan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali(Pemohon Banding) tersebut tidak tepat dan tidak relevan karenaseharusnya yang relevan untuk dilihat adalah ketentuan yangmerujuk pada hak pemajakan Negara sumber sesuai "article 11angka 2 huruf a" P3B yaitu sebagai berikut:"However, In the case of Indonesia, such interest arising inIndonesia may be taxed in Indonesia according to the laws ofIndonesia, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the interest,the tax so charged shall
    Bahwa sesuai dengan Pasal 11 ayat 2 huruf a P3B Indonesia Thailand yang menyatakan bahwa "However, In the case ofIndonesia, such interest arising in Indonesia may be taxed inIndonesia according to the laws of Indonesia, but if theHalaman 15 dari 26 halaman Putusan Nomor 1218/B/PK/PJK/2017recipient is the beneficial owner of the interest, the tax socharged shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross amount ofthe interest, hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa dalam hal diIndonesia, bunga yang berasal dari Indonesia
    Bahwa dengan demikian argumentasi Termohon PeninjauanKembali (semula Pemohon Banding) sebagaimana tersebut diatas tidak tepat dan tidak relevan karena seharusnya yangrelevan untuk dilihat adalah ketentuan yang merujuk pada hakpemajakan Negara sumber yaitu sebagai berikut:"However,(a) In the case of Indonesia,such interest arising in Indonesia may be taxed in Indonesiaaccording to the laws of Indonesia, but if the recipient is thebeneficial owner of the interest, the tax so charged shall notexceed
Register : 20-06-2012 — Putus : 22-10-2012 — Upload : 21-12-2012
Putusan PTUN JAKARTA Nomor 102/G/2012/PTUN-JKT
Tanggal 22 Oktober 2012 — Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia;Antoni Fernando
143102
  • M.F.C6terdapat clause 73 Secrecy Part I General Condition of Contract; subclause Miscellaneous, yang menyatakan:The Contractor, his employees, agents and subcontractors shall notgive to unauthorized persons any information, verbal or otherwise,about the Works and shall not allow anauthorized persons to inspect theWorks, Drawings and Contract Documents without the written consentof the Employer; (Kontraktor, Pegawainya dan Sub kontraktor tidak diperkenankanmenyerahkan kepada pihak lain yang tidak
    Waskita Jaya Purnama), sehingga tidak dapat memberikankontrak Medan Flood Control tersebut kepada pihak lain tanpa seizin Pihak Kedua;Bahwa dalam Medan Flood Control/Contract Package Nomor: M.F.C6 tanggal 21April 2004, terdapat klausul (clause) 73 Secrecy Part I General Condition ofContract, sub clause Miscellaneous, yang menyatakan: The Contractor, hisemployees, agents and subcontractors shall not give to unauthorized persons anyinformation, verbal or otherwise, about the Works and shall not allow