No.00825 atas nama Haji Mohamad Budiarjo);Hal 5 dari 16 hal.Put.No.71/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Pal.6.3.2. Sebidang tanah non pertanian, luas 2.550 M2, terletak diKelurahan Pantoloan, Kecamatan Tawaeli, Kota Palu (SHM. No.01107 atas nama Moh. Budiarjo);6.3.3. Sebidang tanah non pertanian, luas 604 M2, terletak diKelurahan Pantoloan, Kecamatan Tawaeli, Kota Palu (SHM. No.01118 atas nama Moh. Budiarjo);6.3.4.

Bengkalis ;6.3.2.

Bahwa dalil Penggugat pada point 6.3dengan sub item (6.3.1 dan 6.3.2) adalahbenar sepanjang Penggugat menyebut danmengutip pasal pasal yang terdapat padaPeraturan Daerah Kab.

Lapisan tanah sangat lunak cukup tebal dari muka tanahsampai kedalaman 26 m ;6.3.2. Lapisan tanah dari muka tanah sampai 60 m merupakanHalaman 4 dari 16 hal. Putusan Nomor 401/PDT/2016/PT. DKI6.4.6.5.6.6.lapisan lempung abuabu;6.3.3. Tidak ditemukan lapisan tanah keras;6.3.4. Daya dukung Vertikal, Horizontal sangat rendah serta sangatmempunyai potensi penurunan konsolidasi yang sangat besar;6.3.5.

Zulham Effendi bin Amril Hasan (lakilaki);6.3.2. Hendra Effendi bin Amril Hasan (lakilaki);6.3.3. Aprinal Effendi binAmril Hasan (lakilaki);6.3.4. Elsa Fitri Ramadhani binti Amril Hasan (perempuan);6.3.5.

Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.

In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.

In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26(4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all ofthe percentages appearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI ofthis CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty

Bahwa Pemohon mengakui dekat dengan FULANAdan menjalin hubungan.6.3.2. Bahwa pada saat orang tua menyampaikan untukmemilin perempuan itu) atau. Termohon. Pemohonmenyampaikan bahwa tidak mau meninggalkan FULANA.6.3.3. Bahwa setelah pulang dari Minasa Upa, Pemohonmenyampaikan kepada Termohon akan menginap dan tinggalbersama orang tua untuk membahagiakan orang tua sehinggaPemohon menyiapkan pakaiannya. Dan ternyata Pemohonjarang dirumah orang tua Pemohon.7.

Lakilaki (saudara kandung almarhum) ;PENGGUGAT 1, Perempuan (saudara kandung almarhum) ;PENGGUGAT 2, Perempuan (saudara kandung almarhum) ;Adalah ahli waris dari almarhum ANAK 3 ;1.Meletakkan Sita Jaminan (Conservatoir beslag) atas hartatersebut pada poin 6.2, 6.3.6 dan poin 7.7.1.2 dan 3 ;Menyatakan sita jaminan yang diletakkan tersebut sah danberharga ;Menyatakan seluruh harta kekayaan yang diperoleh selamaperkawinan antara almarhum ANAK 3 dan XXXXX sebagaimanyang tersebut pada poin 6.2, 6.3.1, 6.3.2

Penggugat juga meminta agarharta brupa sebuah rumah permanen (posita 6.2), juga harta berupa uang duka (posita 6.3.1),Uang Taspen (posita 6.3.2), gaji terusan (posita 6.3.3), uang pensiunan bulanan (posita 6.3.4),premi asuransi (posita 6.3.5), dan perabot rumah tangga (posita 6.3.6) ditetapkan sebagai hartabersama yang diperoleh selama perkawinan almarhum ANAK 3 dan TERGUGAT, kemudianditetapkan bagian Tergugat serta ahli waris lainnya ;Menimbang, bahwa di depan persidangan Tergugat telah memberikan

., M.Si. binti Yusuf Malaka;6.3.2. Tri Waluyo bin Yusuf Malaka;6.3.3. Ayub sudibyo bin Yusuf Malaka;6.3.4. Ernawati binti Yusuf Malaka;6.3.5. Titi Istiawati binti Yusuf Malaka;6.3.6. Rostianawati binti Yusuf Malaka;6.3.7. Utami binti Yusuf Malaka;6.3.8. Bambang Purnomo bin Yusuf Malaka;6.3.9. Sugiarti binti Yusuf Malaka;6.3.10. Herman susilo bin Yusuf Malaka;6.3.11. Budi Raharjo bin Yusuf Malaka;6.3.12. Agus Hartawan bin Yusuf Malaka;7.

. =2/3x harta bawaan (poin 5.1) + radd = 70,83%;6.3.2. =2/3x Y2 harta bersama (poin 5.2) + radd = 35,42%;Hal. 16 dari 18 hal. Put. No. 39 K/AG/20107. Menghukum Tergugat untuk menyerahkan kepada Penggugat, turutTergugat dan II bahagian yang menjadi hak masingmasing sebagaimanatersebut pada diktum angka 6.2 dan 6.3 putusan ini;8. Menghukum Tergugat membayar uang paksa Rp 1.000.000, (satu jutarupiah) perhari setiap kali Tergugat lalai dalam melaksanakan isi putusan ini;9.

Haryudi (lakilaki, lahir di Jakarta 25 September1963).6.3.2. Hendrayana (lakilaki, lahir di Jakarta 15 Januari1966).6.3.3. Lies Sulistiyasari ( perempuan, lahir di Jakarta 14Juli 1968).6.3.4. Adin Haryadinata (lakilaki, lahir di Jakarta 2 April1975).6.3.5. Ade Suhartiningrum (perempuan, lahir di Jakarta 30September 1976).6.3.6. Lisa Megasari ( perempuan, lahir di di Jakarta 15Juni 1979),6.4.

Rifgi Ananda/Tergugat Il;6.3.2. Nauval Hamdani/Tergugat III;Bahwa berdasarkan hukum faraid dan KHI, bagian hak warismasingmasing ahli waris almarhum Hasan Bukhari adalah:7.1. lbu/almahumah HJ. Asiyah Zaenab, mendapat 1/6 bagian,asal masalah 48, sehingga hak bagiannya menjadi 8/48bagian;7.2. Isteri/Maemanah. S.Ag,/Tergugat I, mendapat 1/8 bagian,asal masalah 48, sehingga hak bagiannya menjadi 6/48bagian;7.3.

Bahwa terdapat pindah buku dari rekening pinjaman sebesarRp175 juta, Rp300 juta dan Rp1,45 milyar;6.3.2. Bahwa setoran tunai yang pada saat keberatan TermohonPeninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding) belummenunjukkan bukti setoran dan pada saat rekon ditunjukkansetoran senilai Rp400 juta;6.3.3.

Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSCversi terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.

In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.

In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26(4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all ofthe percentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VIof this CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.

In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.

In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26 (4)of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of thepercentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI ofthis CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9) :BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.

In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACThave been determined on the assumption that CONTRACTOR is subject tofinal tax on profits after tax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the IndonesiaIncome Tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treaty to which theGovernment of the Republic of Indonesia has become a party.

In the eventthat, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any of Participating InterestHolder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes notsubject to final tax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia IncomeTax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS so affected bythe non applicability of such final tax deduction or the applicability of a TaxTreaty

Hanrozan Haznam (lakilaki);6.3.2. Mahdalisa Haznam (perempuan);6.3.3. Azinul Judi Adrian Haznam (lakilaki);6.4. Madoeretna Haznam, (perempuan) meninggal dunia tanggal 8 April1984. Semasa hidupnya menikah 2 (dua) kali. Pertama kali denganMoch. Amin pada tanggal 11 Oktober 1951 di Jakarta dan kemudianputus karena perceraian pada tanggal 16 September 1957 danmeninggalkan anak:6.4.1. Duardino Indramin (lakilaki);6.4.2. Durando Juniman Sjawali (lakilaki);Hal. 5 dari 18 hal. Put.

Candrawati binti Amaq Candra (anak perempuan),meninggal dunia dalam keadaan beragama Hindu untuk ituterhijab untuk mendapatkan warisan;6.3.2. Suminahbinti Amaq Candra, (anak perempuan)memperoleh 1/3 bagian dari bagian Arya, telah meninggaldunia maka bagiannya jatuh kepada ahli warisnya:6.3.2.1.Nursam (Suami) memperoleh 1/4 bagian Suminah;Hal. 22 dari 42 hal. Put. No. 52 K/Ag/20156.4.6.5.6.3.3.6.3.2.2. Nurhayati binti Nursam (anak perempuan)memperoleh 1/3 x 2/3 bagian;6.3.2.3.

Candrawati binti Amagq Candra (anak perempuan),meninggal dunia dalam keadaan beragama Hindu untukitu terhalang untuk mendapatkan warisan ;6.3.2. Suminah binti Amaq Candra, (anak perempuan)memperoleh 1/3 bagian dari bagian Arya alias AmaqCandra, telah meninggal dunia maka bagiannya jatuhkepada ahli warisnya:Hal. 29 dari 42 hal. Put. No. 52 K/Ag/20156.4.6.5.6.3.3.6.3.2.1. Nursam (Suami) memperoleh 1/4 bagianSuminah;6.3.2.2.

Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):Halaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government

In the event that, subsequently,CONTRACTOR or any of Participating Interest Holder(s) comprisingCONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT becomes not subject to finaltax deduction under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Lawand/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all of the percentages appearing inSubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of this CONTRACT, asapplicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR and BPMIGAS soaffected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction or theapplicability of a Tax Treaty

Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.

In the event that, subsequently, CONTRACTOR or any ofParticipating Interest Holder(s) comprising CONTRACTOR under thisCONTRACT becomes not subject to final tax deduction under Article 26(4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and/or subject to a Tax Treaty, all ofthe percentages appearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VIof this CONTRACT, as applicable to the portions of CONTRACTOR andBPMIGAS so affected by the non applicability of such final tax deduction orthe applicability of a Tax Treaty

uraian fakta tersebut, Majelis Komisi menilaidengan adanya hubungan keluarga suami dan istri antaraTerlapor dan Terlapor ll, adanya hubungan keponakan antaraTerlapor Il dengan Terlapor Ill, dan adanya hubungan menantuantara Terlapor Ill dengan Terlapor dan Terlapor Il, sertadiperkuat dengan adanya alamat yang sama pada dokumenisian kualifikasi antara Terlapor , Terlapor Il dan Terlapor Ill,merupakan bukti adanya hubungan afiliasi antara Terlapor ,Terlapor Il dan Terlapor III dalam perkara a quo;6.3.2

Hal inimembuktikan Terlapor Il dan Terlapor Ill tidakserius dan didesain untuk kalah atau dengan katalain hanya sebagai pendamping bagi Terlapor dalam mengikuti tender perkara a quo;6.3.2. Pengurusan dokumen penawaran Terlapor , Terlapor Ildan Terlapor III dilakukan oleh orang yang sama;a. Bahwa Terlapor , Terlapor Il dan Terlapor Illmerupakan perusahaan yang terafiliasisebagaimana telah diuraikan pada bagian TentangHukum butir 5.5.1;b.

Bahwa adanya afiliasi antara Terlapor I, Terlapor Il dan Terlaporlll sebagaimana telah diuraikan pada bagian Tentang Hukumbutir 5.5.1 (vide buktiC6, C11, C15, B10 dan B11);6.3.2.

Saharudin, sebagai; Turut Tergugat 6.3.2. Sadrun Bin Amaq Samiun, yang telah meninggal dunia sekitar tahun1974, semasa hidupnya menikah dengan Saknah Als Inaq Sahrumdengan status cerai mati dari pernikahannya tersebut dikaruniai anak 1(satu) orang lakilaki yaitu :3.2.1. Sahram Bin Sadrun sebagai Tergugat 1.3.3. Rusni Als Hj. Rusni Binti Amaq Samiun sebagai Penggugat 1.3.4. Sadran Bin Amag Samiun sebagai Penggugat 2.3.5. Sadri Bin Amaq Samiun sebagai Penggugat 3.Hal. 7 dari 20 Hal.