Ditemukan 9797 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 02-10-2013 — Putus : 29-04-2014 — Upload : 27-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.52220/PP/M.VIIB/19/2014
Tanggal 29 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11620
  • countries to be eligible for preferential treatment, therequirement is that either: The products wholly obtained in the exportingMember State as defined in Rule 3 of the ASEANChina Rules of Origin.bahwa berdasarkan Annex 3 Rule 3 Rules of Origin for The ASEANChinaFree Trade Area disebutkan bahwa produk yang yang digolongkan dalamorigin criterion Wholly Obtained harus memenuhi syarat ketentuan Rule 3ROO, sebagai berikut:Rule 3: Wholly Obtained Products:Within the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall
    importir berharap Terbanding dapatmembuktikan secara transparan pembuktiannya dari penerbit Form E tersebutdi atas.bahwa sesuai Appendix I Operational Certification Procedure for the RulesOf Origin, Rule 12 Where the origin of a good is not in doubt, the discoveryof minor discrepancies, between the statements made in a Certificate ofOrigin and those made in the documents submitted to the customs authority ofthe importing party for the purpose of carrying out the formalities forimporting the good shall
Register : 20-03-2024 — Putus : 02-04-2024 — Upload : 24-04-2024
Putusan PN INDRAMAYU Nomor 15/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN Idm
Tanggal 2 April 2024 — Terdakwa
1310
  • 1 (satu) buah topi rimba bertuliskan Lawlles warna hitam corak
  • 1 (satu) buah shall warna hitam bergambar bintang serta bertuliskan thrasher warna putih
    • .
  1. Membebankan biaya perkara kepada Anak untuk membayar biaya perkara sejumlah Rp1.000,00 (Seribu Rupiah).
Register : 12-01-2015 — Putus : 11-06-2015 — Upload : 08-03-2016
Putusan PA TULUNGAGUNG Nomor 306/Pdt.G/2015/PA.TA
Tanggal 11 Juni 2015 — Pemohon Termohon
70
  • yang sah dan tidak ternyata ketidak hadirannya tersebut disebabkanoleh sesuatu alasan yang sah menurut hukum, oleh karenanya harusdinyatakan Termohon tidak hadir dan sesuai dengan Pasal 125 HIR perkara inidapat diperiksa dan diputus tanpa hadirnya Termohon (verstek) dan sesuaipula dengan kaidah hukum Islam yang tercantum dalam kitab Al Anwar Juz IIhalaman 55 yang kemudian diambil alin sebagai pendapat Majelis Hakim yangberbunyi sebagai berikut :Artiny TTR em eb aT ee ee om Le me oe Me ml DL eede shall
    Adal ae Welw, il te pA Gla dz eddlc shall Aull yg gel & a jhe og A hao plas) ptememutus gugatan tersebutMenimbang, bahwa permohonan Pemohon pada pokoknya mohonkepada Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung agar diberi izin untuk menjatukantalak satu raj terhadap Termohon dengan alasan Termohon pergimeninggalkan Pemohon dan tidak diketahui tempat tinggalnya sejak bulanJanuari 2013 sampai sekarang tidak ada kabar berita dan tidak diketahuitempat tinggalnya;Menimbang, bahwa Termohon pergi tanpa ijin dan selama
Register : 26-09-2013 — Putus : 08-09-2014 — Upload : 03-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.54962/PP/M.XVIIB/19/2014
Tanggal 8 September 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12523
  • pelintas batas, atau barangkiriman melalui pos atau jasa titipan;bahwa sesuai Pasal 13 ayat (2) UndangUndang Nomor 10 Tahun 1995 tentang Kepabeanan sebagaimanatelah diubah dengan UndangUndang Nomor 17 Tahun 2006 menyebutkan tata cara pengenaan danbesarnya tarif bea masuk sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) diatur lebih lanjut dengan peraturan menteri;bahwa berdasarkan Rule 23 Annex A, Operational Certification Procedures for the ROO of ACFTA,disebutkan:The Customs Authority of the importing Party shall
    The third party Invoice number should be indicated in Box 10 of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), theexporter and consignee must be located in the Parties and the copy of the third party Invoice shall beattached to the Certificate of Origin (Form E) when presenting to the Customs Authority of the importing Party;bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 2 Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor: 117/PMK.011/2012 tanggal 10 Juli 2012disebutkan pengenaan bea masuk berdasarkan penetapan tarif bea masuk sebagaimana dimaksud
Putus : 22-12-2015 — Upload : 17-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2691 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 22 Desember 2015 — PT PERTAMINA HULU ENERGI RAJA TEMPIRAI VS PT GOLDEN SPIKE ENERGY INDONESIA,
291197 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • compensatethe Sole Risk Party, with respect to such sole Risk Party Operations,bby delivering to such sole risk Party a quantity of Petroleum andencumberances subject to the obligation to supply domestic market.Such deliveries shall continue until such time as the value of allpetroleum so delivered equals the amount due from such NonSole RiskPary which shall be equal to the total cost of drilling, completing, andequipping the Sole Risk well plus three hundreds percents (300%) (inthe case of a Sole
    PSC Blok Raja tersebut diatursebagai berikut:disputes, if any, arising between Pertamina and contractor relating tothis contract or the interpretation and performance of any of the clausesof this contract, and which cannot be settled amicably, shall beHal. 25 dari Hal. 57 Put. Nomor 2691 K/Pdt/2015submitted to the decision of arbitration.
    Pertamina on the one hand andContractor on the other hand shall each appoint one arbitrator and soadvise the other Party and these two arbitrators will appoint a third. Ifeither party fails to appoint an arbitrator within thirty (30) days afterreceipt of a written request to do so, such arbitrator shall, at the requestof the other party, if the Parties do not otherwise agree, be appointed bythe President of the International Chamber of Commerce.
    If the first twoarbitrators appointed as aforesaid fail to agree on a third within thirty(30) days following the appointment of the second arbitrator, the thirdarbitrator shall, if the Parties do not otherwise agree, be appointed, atthe request of either Party, by the President of the InternationalChamber of Commerce.
    Hal ini sesuai ICC RulesArticle 4 Request for Arbitration, subarticle 3:The request shall, inter alia, contain the following information:d. the relevant agreements and, in particular, the arbitration agreement;Terjemahan bebas Bahasa Indonesia:Permohonan harus, antara lain, memuat informasi sebagai berikut:Hal. 33 dari Hal. 57 Put. Nomor 2691 K/Pdt/201519.20.21.22.d.
Register : 23-06-2011 — Putus : 04-03-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.43677/PP/M.X/16/2013
Tanggal 4 Maret 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11542
  • Bandingmenyatakan halhal sebagai berikut :bahwa Pemohon Banding tidak setuju atas koreksi positif Pajak Masukanterkait Legal Fee sebesar Rp. 14.890.584,00.bahwa atas ketidak setujuan tersebut dapat dijelaskan dan dibuktikan denganbuktibukti yang disampaikan oleh Pemohon Banding dengan rincian sebagaiberikut:e bahwa berdasarkan perjanjian antara Pemohon dengan MMC atasOffshore Operation and Technical Assistance Agreement tertanggal 11Desember 1996 dinyatakan bahwa:Section 2 MMC SUPPORT SERVICEMMC 's services shall
    When reasonably requested byPTSC, MMC shall provide advice and consultations to PTSC .... 2.2.g legal matters, such as contract drafting and review, advice andassistance with defending and prosecuting and settling andcompromising any litigation or claims of liability. bahwa berdasarkan uraian klausal tersebut diatas, MMC memberikandukungan pemberian jasa bantuan operasional dan teknis, khususnya yangberkaitan dengan jasa bantuan hukum/legal kepada Pemohon Banding.Untuk itu, MMC menggunakan konsultan
Register : 08-01-2020 — Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 12-05-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 38 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — PT. QUEEN PACIFIC SUKSESABADI VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
7930 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Theconstituent material of the outer sole for purposes of classification shall be taken to be thematerial having the greatest surface area in contact with the ground. In determining theconstituent material of the outer sole, no account should be taken of attached accessories orreinforcements which partly cover the sole (see Note 4 (b) to this Chapter).
    In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the Tet, The size of the uppers variesvery much between different types of footwear, from those covering the foot and the wholeleg, including the thigh (for example, fishermens boots), to those which consist simply ofstraps or thongs (for example, gaisiciayIf the upper consists of two or more materials, classification is determined by theconstituent material which has the greatest external
    Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter :(2) The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestexternal surface area, no account being taken of acvessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, edging, ormamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestsurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch
    Subject to Note 3 to this Chapter :(a) The material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent material having the greatestextemal surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as anklepatches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments;(b) The constituent material of the outer sole shall be taken to be the material having the greatestSurface area in contact with the ground, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcementssuch
Register : 21-04-2017 — Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 22-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 265/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — AMIN bin HALIM RASIP Lawan H. NALDI NAZAR HAROEN,S.H., Dk
188146
  • Bahwa sesuai perjanjian Memorandum of Aggreement yangditandatangani baik oleh Penggugat dan Para Tergugat padatanggal 15 oktober 2015 yang tertuang dalam point 25 sebagaiberikut :this moa will be effective only once payment isreceived and shall governed by and construed inaccordance wth indonesian lawand shall continue toremain valid for 10 yearsTerjemahan BebasMoa ini akan efektif hanya setelah pembayaranditerima dan diatur oleh dan ditafsirkan sesuaidengan hukum indonesia dan akan tetap berlakuselama
    Bahwa sesuai perjanjian Memorandum of Aggreement yangditandatangani baik oleh Penggugat dan Para Tergugat padatanggal 15 oktober 2015 yang tertuang dalam point 25 sebagaiberikut :this moa will be effective only oncepayment is received and shall governed byand construed in accordance withHal 15 dari 26 Hal Putusan No.265/Pat.G/2017/PN Jkt.Selindonesian law and shall continue toremain valid for 10 yearsTerjemahan BebasMoa ini akan efektif hanya setelahpembayaran diterima dan diatur oleh danditafsirkan
Register : 13-10-2011 — Putus : 28-01-2013 — Upload : 28-06-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor 49247/PP/M.XV/15/2013
Tanggal 28 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding melawan Terbanding
261144
  • Shareholders affiliate Sale of finishecLtd. goods bahwa berdasarkan penelitian Majelis terhadap Sale and Purchase Agreement (bukti P16 dan P12.1 diketahui *Marubeni Corporation, Japan agrees to sell and deliver at the internationally comprice;bahwa dalam pasal 2.2 diketahui "NMC shall purchase all the raw material which are supplieoutside of Indonesia through Marubeni Corporation, Japan;bahwa dalam pasal 4.2. diketahui the price of the raw material, unless otherwise agreed betweeand Marubeni, shall
    Statement of Changes in Equity diketahui Pemohon Banding memiliki akumulasi kdi awal tahun 2007 sebesar USD.(3,746,516.00), laba di tahun 2007 sebesar USD.214,050.00 dantahun 2008 sebesar USD.(632,256.00) dengan total akumulasi kerugian di tahun 2008 sebesa(4,164,722.00);bahwa dalam persidangan Pemohon Banding menyatakan pembayaran royalti dilakukan atas 5puluh empat) paten;bahwa berdasarkan penelitian Majelis terhadap License and Technical Assistance Agreement (buldan P19) pasal 3.3 diketahui "NMC shall
Putus : 14-12-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1536/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 14 Desember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. CADBURY INDONESIA
8452 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • dan juga tidakmenjelaskan bahwa Legalisasi fotokopi Surat Keterangan Domisili dilampirkandi dalam Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 26;Bahwa transaksi yang terkait Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 26 seharusnyadiperhatikan apakah ada Tax Treaty yang mengaturnya, sebelum menentukanapakah perlu dilakukan koreksi tarif, maka ditentukan dulu hak pemajakannyabagi masingmasing Negara;Tax Treaty Indonesia Singapore, Pasal 7 ayat (1) menyatakan:The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting State shall
    Putusan Nomor 1536/B/PK/PJK/2016 through a permanent establishment situated therein, If the enterprise carries onbusiness as aforesaid, the profits of the enterprise may be taxed in the otherState but only so much of them as is attributable to that permanentestablishment,Tax Treaty Indonesia UK, Pasal 7 ayat (1):The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting State shall be taxable only in thatState unless the enterprise carries on business in the other Contracting Statethrough a permanent establishment
    them as is directly or indirectly attributable to thepermanent establishment,Tax Treaty Indonesia UK, Pasal 12 ayat (13):(1) Royalties arising in a Contracting State which are derived by a resident ofthe other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State;(2) However, such royalties may also be taxed in the Contracting State in whichthey arise and according to the law of that State; but where the beneficialowner of such royalties is a resident of the other Contracting State the tax socharged shall
    Putusan Nomor 1536/B/PK/PJK/2016(1) Royalties derived from sources within one of the Contracting States by aresident of the other Contracting State may be taxed by both ContractingStates;(2) The rate of tax imposed by a Contracting State on royalties derived fromsources within that Contracting State and beneficially owned by a resident ofthe other Contracting State shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross amountof royalties described in paragraph 3 (a) and 10 percent of the gross amountof royalties
    The rate of tax imposed by a Contracting State on royaltiesderived from sources within that Contracting State andbeneficially owned by a resident of the other ContractingState shall not exceed 10 percent of the gross amount ofroyalties described in paragraph 3;Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor KEP506/PJ./2001tentang Perubahan Atas Keputusan Direktur Jenderal PajakNomor KEP108/PJ.1/1996 tentang Bentuk FormulirPemotongan/Pemungutan Pajak Penghasilan SebagaimanaTelah Diubah Dengan KEP 02/PJ.1/
Register : 14-07-2011 — Putus : 26-01-2012 — Upload : 24-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 397/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 26 Januari 2012 —
6239
  • Oleh karenanya pada tanggal 16 November 2009 diantara TERGUGATdan PENGGUGAT telah dibuat Agreement For Sale And Purchase Of Coal No.APBU/0109 tertanggal 16 November 2009 (selanjutnya disebut "Perjanjian")(Bukti P3).Bahwa, pada intinya Perjanjian tersebut mengatur halhal sebagai berikut:1) SPESIFIKASI. sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 3 Perjanjian:"The coal sold under this Agreement shall have following shall have thefollowing typical specifications determined by inspection procedures asprovided for
    No.397/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel Moisture (ADB) Ash (ADB) 38% 0,9% Above 0.9% Total Sulphur(ADB) HGI 45Size (Ox 50 90% Minimum MM) 2) KUANTITAS DAN JANGKA WAKTU PENGIRIMAN, sebagaimana diaturdalam Pasal 4 Perjanjian:The Quantity of coal that agreed to be purchased and sold be 3 x 50,000 MT(+/ 10% Vessels Option) of steam coal from November 2009 January 2010.Laycan shall be mutually discussed and agreed."3) CARA PENGIRIMAN, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 11 ayat (1) Perjanjian:The Coal will be delivered
Register : 12-05-2011 — Putus : 27-05-2013 — Upload : 12-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.45149/PP/M.X/16/2013
Tanggal 27 Mei 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
13153
  • Hal ini berdasarkan pada poin 5.4 dari Smelter Licyang menyatakan: ".PTS shall provides MMC with written report that sets forth theof anode produced in the preceeding mont at PTSs Smelter; Berdasarkan klausal tersebut diatas, nilai pencatatan akrual setiap bulan merupakan laporanyang dikirimkan oleh Pemohon Banding kepada MMC dan berdasarkan agreement tersebumemeriksa dan melakukan konfirmasi jumlah pada akhir tahun dalam bentuk invoice.dapat dimungkinkan jika jumlah invoice yang diterbitkan oleh
    Smelting dengan MMC atas Offshore Operation and TAssistance Agreement tertanggal 11 Desember 1996 dinyatakan bahwa:Section 2 MMC SUPPORT SERVICEMMC 's services shall be performed in Japan or elsewhere outside of the Republic of Indonesi:2.2.Offshore Business Operations Advice.
    Smelting dengan NINIC section 4"MMC shall send to Pr. Smelting an invoice for any of the following incurred in the prior montsupport fee, b) expenses that are reimbursable by PT.Smelting to MMC pursuant to this agreen bahwa berdasarkan uraian klausal tersebut diatas, MMC menagih kepada PT.
Putus : 15-04-2013 — Upload : 25-06-2013
Putusan PN PALOPO Nomor 84/PID.B/2013/PN. PLP
Tanggal 15 April 2013 — asrul
5020
  • Tujuan utama darisistem peradilan pidana ini telah ditegaskan dalam SMRJJ (Beijing Rules)dalam rule 5.1bahwa:The juvenile justice system shall emphasize the well being of the juvenileand shall ensurethat any reaction to juvenile offenders shall always be in proportion to the circumtances ofboth the offender and the offence,Dari hal ini dapat disimpulkan adanya dua sasaran dibentuknya Pengadilan Anak, yaitu:(a) Memajukan kesejahteraan anak (the promotion of the well being of the juvenile), yangartinya
Putus : 18-07-2016 — Upload : 02-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 219 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016
Tanggal 18 Juli 2016 — PT INDIRATEX SPINDO VS EVERSEASON ENTERPRISES, Ltd
13261149 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ineternasional pada saat kontrak jual beli(Tahun 2010) maupun pada saat pemeriksaan arbitrase (Tahun 2012 danTahun 2013) Termohon selaku perusahaan dari negara British VirginsIslandyang tidak dan/atau belum menerapkan/mengikatkan/meratifikasiKonvensi New York 1958 sehingga patut dan layak Termohon tidak dapatdan/atau belum mendapatkan hak dan/atau perlindungan status pengakuandan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase asing, sebagaimana ditentukan ArticleXIV Konvensi New York 1958 ditentukan;A Contracting State shall
    Everseason Enterprises Lid. terbukti terdapat unsur muslihatdan/atau keadaan palsu tentang kedudukan dan negara Termohon baikdalam kontrak jual beli kapas dan pada saat proses pemeriksaan olehArbiter ICA, yakni seolaholah benar dari Hongkong (Negara Tiongkok) danyang sebenarnya (factual) Everseason Enterprises Ltd tidak pernahtercatat dan/atau terdaftar di Hongkong;Maka sesuai tertio hukum Internasional dan hukum Nasional Indonesia,yakni:Pasal XIV Konvensi New York 1958 ditentukan:A Contracting State shall
    tanggal 6September 2013 (bukti P8) berikut terjemahan resmi bukti P9 sehinggaberalasan menurut hukum dan tertib hukum di Indonesia terhadap putusanyang sudah dianulir dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat tidakdapat diakui dan dilaksanakan di Indonesia;Bahwa tentang kewenangan Pengadilan Nasional dalam mengadiliperkara pembatalan dan/atau pengakuan berikut pelaksanaan putusanarbitrase internasional secara expresis verbis dinyatakan pada Pasal IllKonvensi New York 1958 Each Contracting State shall
Putus : 04-09-2015 — Upload : 17-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1693 K/PID.SUS/2015
Tanggal 4 September 2015 — PENUNTUT UMUM pada KEJAKSAAN NEGERI DEPOK ; SIDIK PERMANA alias IYANG bin DEDI KURNIAWAN
2415 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Memerintahkan barang bukti berupa: 7 (tujuh) linting ganja berat netto 2,6754 gr 1 (satu) bungkus rokok merk Djarum Super warna coklat ; 1 (satu) bungkus rokok merk Gudang Garam Filter warna merah; 1 (satu) helai shall warna kombinasi merah kuning hijau;Dijadikan barang bukti dalam perkara lain atas nama Terdakwa Taufik MalikAzhari;4.
    Memerintahkan agar terhadap barang bukti berupa: 7 (tujuh) linting ganja berat netto 2,6754 gr;1 (satu) bungkus rokok merk Djarum super warna coklat;1 (satu) bungkus rokok merk gudang garam filter warna merah; 1 (satu) henai shall warna kombinasi merah kuning hijau;Dijadikan dalam perkara atas nama Terdakwa Taufik Malik Azhari;Hal. 9 dari 16 hal. Put. No. 1693 K/PID.SUS/20156.
    Menetapkan agar barang bukti: 7 (tujuh) linting ganja berat netto 2,6754 gr; 1 (satu) bungkus rokok merk Djarum Super warna coklat; 1 (satu) bungkus rokok merk Gudang Garam Filter warna merah; 1 (satu) helai shall warna kombinasi merah kuning hijau;Dikembalikan kepada Jaksa/Penuntut Umum untuk barang bukti dalamperkara lain atas nama Terdakwa Taufik Malik Azhari;Membebankan Terdakwa untuk membayar biaya perkara dalam semua tingkatpengadilan dan dalam tingkat kasasi ditetapkan sebesar Rp2.500,00 (
Register : 10-02-2011 — Putus : 15-03-2012 — Upload : 30-04-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 15 Maret 2012 — PT. PUKUAFU INDAH (PT. PI), M E L A W A N 1. NEWMONT INDONESIA LIMITED (NIL) (DENVER), 2. NUSA TENGGARA MINING CORPORATION (NTMC) (Tokyo),
152104
  • Company (PT NNT) dan asumsi PT Pukuafu Indah atasseluruh kewajiban yang sedang dan akan berjalan di Newmont.e Dalam Pasal 8 ayat 4:No Party hereto shall assign, transfer, encumber, part with possession of grant anypower of attorney over or in any other way directly or Indirectly deal with its Interestin the application for the Contract of Work, any other property subject to this JointVenture or its shareholdings in the PT.
    InterBank Offer Rate from time to time for one hundred and eighty (180)days Eurodollars, which interest will oe calculated with quarterly rests, and from thetime for calculation shall be and be deemed to have been added to and accumulatedwith the outstanding balance of the loan money and shall itself bear interestaccordingly;Teriemahan :Uang pinjaman tersebut akan dikenakan bunga setiap tahunnya sebesar 2% +SIBOR dari waktu ke waktu untuk 180 hari Dollar Eropa, dimana bunga ituakan diperhitungkan
    Indah shall assign such dividends to Newmont accordingly.Indah shall execute security and divinded, assignment documents in the from ofSchedules.
    becomenull and void, and provided, second, that if all required Governmentapprovals to enable NIL/NTMC to complete the transfer of the 3%interest as approved by the Companys shareholders by separateresolution (pursuant to the 2006 divestiture program) is not obtainedby I August 2007, the approval to transfer the 7% interest to PTPukuafu Indah shall become null and void.
    be entitled to withdraw without penalty from the JointVenture upon ten (10) days written notice to that effect to Indahhowever Indah shall not be entitled to withdraw from the JointVenture.Terjemahan:7.1 Hak Para Pihak untuk Menarik DiriNewmont berhak untuk menarik diri dari Perjanjian Joint Ventureini tanpa dikenakan penalti, dengan terlebih dahulu menyampaikanpemberitahuan tertulis sepuluh (10) hari sebelumnya kepada Indah,namun demikian Indah tidak berhak untuk menarik diri dariPerjanjian Joint
Putus : 10-03-2014 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 763/B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 10 Maret 2014 — PT. HYUNDAI INDONESIA MOTOR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
5037 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • DELETION COMPENSATION; RUNNING ROYALTY"As consideration for the reduction of income to be received by HMC as a result of permitting HIM to perform the Deletion and Local Manufacturingreferred to in Article 2 hereof, HIM shall pay to MC the followng amounts:5.1. Deletion Compensation 5.1.1.
    A Deletion Compensation in the emount of six Million andFive hundred Thousand United States Dollars (US$6,500,000)which shall be paid partially wthin 4 (four) years after thisAgreement is made and entered into;5.1.2 The parties agree that such payment wil be transferred toHMC through Hyundai Corporation, or such other party asdesignated by HMC.5.2 Running RoyaltyRunning Royalty of One Hundred twenty Dollars (US$ 120) shall bepaid by HIM with respect to each and every licensed Vehiclemanufactured
Putus : 26-03-2013 — Upload : 06-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 877 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 26 Maret 2013 — ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, dkk ; PT. AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, dkk
12961070 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The tribunal order that interest on the Respondents to pay to the Claimants asspecified in paragraph 3 (C) above, shall run from the Tribunals order dated 6October 2009 at rate of 5,33% per annum pursuant to Section 20 of theInternational Arbitration Act (Cap 143A).Terjemahan Resmi Dalam Bahasa Indonesia:a. Memutuskan dalam persidangan pada tanggal 17 September 2009 bahwa kami harusmengkaji biaya dan tidak menunda putusan kami sebagaimana yang diminta PARATERMOHON PT. Ayunda Prima Mitra, PT.
    RI and R2 shall jointly and severally indemnity Ci and 02 for the benefit of 06, 07and C8 in respect of any further losses which may be suffered by 06, 07 and O08 byreason of the breach of RI and R2 of clause 17.6 of the SSA, including such liabilityas the Respondents may establish against 06, 07 or O8 in the Indonesian proceedingsor any replacement proceedings in so far as they relate to the joint ventureagreement.3.
    RI shall not by itself or through any company or person commence or pursue furtheror other proceedings in Indonesia or elsewhere against the Claimants in relation toor in connection with the existence or otherwise of a binding joint venture agreementfor Direct Vision or any financial relief related thereto.4.
    R2 shall forthwith cease to fund the Indonesia proceedings whether directly orindirectly and shall require RI forthwith to discontinue the Indonesia proceedingsTerjemahan Resmi dalam Bahasa Indonesia:PEMBAYARAN GANTI RUGI BERDASARKAN BAGIAN KETIGA DARIKESIMPULAN KAMI, MAJELIS ARBITER MEMUTUS DAN MENETAPKANBAHWA PEMBAYARAN GANTI RUGI HARUS DIBUAT DAN DIBAYARKANSEBAGAI BERIKUT:1.4nNnNKepada C6 (Pemohon VI) RMIO3.333.546 oleh R1 (PT. Ayunda Prima Mitra), R2(PT. First Media, Tbk), dan R3 (PT.
    take place atthe Singapore international Arbitration Centre and the award of arbitrators shall befinal and binding upon the Parties ;Terjemahan resminya.Prosedur Penyelesaian Perkara.
Register : 23-07-2018 — Putus : 05-12-2018 — Upload : 18-06-2020
Putusan PA DENPASAR Nomor 320/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Dps.
Tanggal 5 Desember 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
2312
  • shall Gpbied Ge GUN alli Dy! Us) absazgall Gaudly Quay 5M asl cle Say Ul cline SI el OY cay ot Ue 3 m2 ely jl!
Register : 23-07-2013 — Putus : 17-06-2014 — Upload : 27-01-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 438/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 17 Juni 2014 — PT TUNGGAL SILA FARMA Lawan l. PT CONSUMER CHOICE, 2. HAMADI WIDJAJA , 3. MICHAEL WANANDI , 4. PT PARAZELSUS INDONESIA.
110165
  • The aggregate purchase price for the 420 (four hundred andtwenty) Shares shall be amount of US$1,750,000.00 (one million sevenhundred and fifty thousand United States Dollar) (hereinafter referred to asPurchase Price).
    (selanjutnya disebutsebagai PTX)Bahwa ketentuan sebagaimana tertuang dalam Article 3, 3.2 sebagai berikut:Paymenta For the consideration for the sale of the shares in the sum of US$500,000.00 (five hundred thousand United States Dollar) shall be paidon 31.07.2008.
    The aggregate purchase price for the 420 (four hundred andtwenty) Shares shall be amount of US$1,250,000.00 (one million two hundredand fifty thousand United States Dollar) (hereinafter reffered to as PurchasePrice).Bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan di atas, membuktikan adanya hubungan antaraPrinciple Agreement dengan Sale Agreement jika dikaitkan dengan adanyaperubahan harga Saham.
    Hubungantersebut lahir karena TERGUGAT I sepakat untuk memegang objek SaleAgreement sendiri senilai harga saham Rp7.000.000.000,00 dan sisanya akandijual kepada investor lain pada tanggal 31 Desember 2008 sebagaimanatertuang dalam Addendum to Sale And Purchase of Shares Agreement (SaleAddendum) pada tanggal 16 Oktober 2008 telah dibuat dan ditandatanganioleh TERGUGAT I dan PENGGUGAT untuk perubahan terhadap SaleAgreement selengkapnya sebagai berikut:2, Amandemets(b) PT CC shall ensure that the transaction
    The Lender has the rights to request early before Desember 31% 2008,and the Borrower shall repay all of its obligation in full upon the request ofthe LenderBahwa pembayaran yang tertunggak atas objek Sale Agreement sebagaimanadimaksud PENGGUGAT dalam poin 5 Gugatan tidak dapat dipisahkan denganpiutang TERGUGAT I atas TURUT TERGUGAT atas sejumlah uang yangsebenarnya sudah dialokasikan untuk membayar pembayaran Saham milikPENGGUGAT di TURUT TERGUGAT sendiri kepada PENGGUGAT;Bahwa TERGUGAT I dalam hal