Ditemukan 330 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 14-12-2015 — Upload : 10-08-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1700 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 14 Desember 2015 — MARUBENI CORPORATION VS PT SWEET INDOLAMPUNG
297254 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Tergugat juga menyatakan secara tegas dalam alinea tersebutbahwa Tergugat akan langsung melakukan pembayaran pada saat pertamakali Penggugat meminta pembayaran kepada Tergugat;Alinea kedua pada 2 (dua) perjanjian Penjaminan tertanggal 17 Juli 1993(Contract For Undertaking Guarantee) menyatakan sebagai berikut:In consideration of your issuing the Guarantee, we hereby unconditionallyand irrevocably undertake to indemnity and reimburse you for whateveramounts you may calledupon to pay to the lender
    Putusan No.1700 K/Pdt/2015"hereby request that you issue a letter of guarantee (hereinafter called the"guarantee") for our account in favor of Marubeni U.K. P.L.C.
    P.L.C (untuk selanjutnya disebut "Pemberi Pinjaman") dalam bentukdan substansi yang memuaskan Pemberi Pinjaman sehubungan denganpinjaman sebesar USD 50,000,000 (lima puluh dolar Amerika Serikat)diberikan kepada kami oleh Pemberi Pinjaman berdasarkan Perjanjiantertanggal 17 Juli 1993 (selanjutnya disebut "Perjanjian Pinjaman").Kewajiban Termohon Kasasi pada CUG 1 halaman 1 alinea 2:"In consideration of your issuing the guarantee, we hereby unconditionallyand irrevocably undertake to indemnity and
    P.L.C (untuk selanjutnya disebut"Pemberi Pinjaman") dalam bentuk dan substansi yang memuaskanPemberi Pinjaman sehubungan dengan pinjaman sebesar USD27,500,000 (dua puluh tujuh lima ratus dolar Amerika Serikat) diberikankepada kami oleh memberi pinjaman berdasarkan Perjanjian tertanggal17 Juli 1993 (selanjutnya disebut "Perjanjian Pinjaman")"Kewajiban Termohon Kasasi pada CUG 2 halaman 1 alinea 2:"In consideration of your issuing the guarantee, we hereby unconditionallyand irrevocably undertake to
Putus : 12-12-2012 — Upload : 26-02-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 185 PK/PDT.SUS/2012
Tanggal 12 Desember 2012 — PT. LE GLOBAL, diwakili oleh SUMIATI DJOKO selaku Direktur Utama PT. LE GLOBAL vs 1. RODENTUS RAWAT S, dkk.
10243 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Le Global on Hua Wei BakrieProject we hereby to inform you that PT. Hua Wei Tech Investmentdecided to cutoff/cancel 56 sites from total assignment given to PT. LeGlobal;Terjemahan:Perihal: Pembataian 56 titik Proyek Hua Wei Bakrie;Dengan hormat,Merujuk pada buruknya pekerjaan yang dilakukan PT. Le Global untukpengerjaan proyek Hua Wei Bakrie maka bersama ini kami informasikanbahwa kami memutuskan membatalkan 56 titik dari selurun pekerjaanyang telah kami berikan kepada PT. Le Global;28.
Putus : 15-11-2011 — Upload : 13-04-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 165 K/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 15 Nopember 2011 — PT.KALTIMEX JAYA VS INDOVER ASIA LIMITED dkk
7758 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • menghasilkan putusan tidak mempertimbangkan fakta dan buktibukti Pemohon Kasasi/Penggugat yangsangat merugikan Pemohon Kasasi/Penggugat ;Bahwa judex facti tidak mempertimbangkan pengajuan gugatan dalamperkara aquo yang didasarkan atas ketentuan pilinan forum sebagimanadiatur dalam Akta Nomor: 48 tentang Credit Agreement tertanggal 13Agustus 1993 yang dibuat di hadapan Ny.R..Arie Soetardjo,SH, Notarisdi Jakarta (vide P1.a, sesuai ketentuan Pasal 15 huruf (e) mengatursebagai berikut:"The Borrower hereby
Putus : 19-08-2008 — Upload : 21-01-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 445PK/PDT/2007
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2008 — BANK AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY ; MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, dkk. ; PT. INDAH KIAT PULP & PAPER Tbk ; THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, dkk.
463969 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pasal 11.8 Indenture Agreement (Vide Bukti T4 4):(i) Pasal 11.8 Perjanjian Indenture menentukan mengenai:"Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Immunities(a)(b)This Indenture (including the Guarantee) and the Notesshall be construed in accordance with and governed by thelaws of the State of New York;Each of the Issuer and the Guarantor hereby irrevocablyand unconditionally submits to the nonexclusive jurisdictionof any New York State or United States Federal court sittingin New York City
    Each of the Issuer and theGuarantor hereby , irrevocably appoints CT Corporation asits agent for such purpose, and covenants and agrees thatservice of process in any suit, action or proceeding may bemade upon it at the office of such agent at 1633 Broadway,New York, New York 10019.
    Pasal 7.07 Loan Agreement (Vide Bukti T4 5)(i)(ii)Pasal 707 Loan Agreement menyebutkan bahwa"Any legal action or proceeding against the Borrower withrespect to this Agreement or any other Credit Document may bebrought in the courts of the State of New York or of the UnitedStates for the Southern District of New York and, by executionand delivery of this Agreement, the Borrower hereby accepts foritself and in respect of its property, generally andunconditionally, the jurisdiction of the aforesaid
    No. 445 PK/Pdt/2007(ii)"Each of the Issuer and the Guarantors (a) agrees thot anyaction or proceeding brought by any Underwriter arising out ofor relating to this Agreement, the Indenture, the Notes or thecontemplated hereby and thereby may be instituted in any Statecourt in New York City, (b) irrevocably waives, to the it mayeffectively do so, any objection (i) which it may now or hereafterhave to the laying of the venue of any such suit, action orproceeding in any Federal or State court in New
    Pasal 7.07 Loan Agreement:Any legal action or proceeding against the Borrower with respectto this Agreement or any other Credit Document may be brought inthe courts of the State of New York or of the United States for theSouthern District of New York and, by execution and delivery ofthis Agreement, the Borrower hereby accepts for itself and inrespect of its property, generally and unconditionally, theJurisdiction of the aforesaid courts.
Register : 30-09-2020 — Putus : 21-12-2020 — Upload : 23-12-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 575/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 21 Desember 2020 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : RELIANCE COAL RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED
Pembanding/Tergugat II : MUKUND MADHUSUDAN DONGRE
Pembanding/Tergugat III : RELIANCE POWER NETHERLAND B.V.
Pembanding/Tergugat IV : PT. AVANESH COAL RESOURCES
Pembanding/Tergugat V : PT. SUMUKHA COAL SERVICES
Pembanding/Tergugat VI : PT. HERAMBA COAL RESOURCES
Terbanding/Penggugat I : KOKOS JIANG
Terbanding/Penggugat II : RUSLI
Terbanding/Penggugat III : JUUL RUMAMBI
Terbanding/Penggugat IV : PRESTIGE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD.
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat I : MALA MUKTI, SH., LLM.
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II : PT. SRIWIJAYA BINTANG TIGA ENERGI
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat III : PT. BRAYAN BINTANG TIGA ENERGI,
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat IV : PT. SUGICO PENDRAGON ENERGY
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat V : KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA REPUBLIK INDONESIA CQ. DIREKTORAT JENDERAL ADMINISTRASI HUKUM UMUM
442244
  • The Payee hereby authorizes the Payer to directly deduct theamount of the arrangement fee from the First Advance as part of thedisbursement of the First Advance.Halaman 13 Putusan .No. 575/Pdt/2020/PT.DKI.31.32:33.Mengacu pada Pasal 2.2 tersebut, dapat dilinat bahwa nilai jual beli sahamyang keselurunhannya adalah USD 200,000 (dua ratus ribu Dollar AmerikaSerikat) yang sebelumnya telah diterima oleh Penggugat 1, ternyatakemudian harus dikembalikan lagi kepada Tergugat dengan caradipotong dari uang
Putus : 03-02-2015 — Upload : 01-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 939/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 3 Februari 2015 — PT. SORINI TOWA BERLIAN CORPORINDO vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
11395 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Manufacturer hereby appoints Agent, and Agenthereby accepts appointment as Agent for thesales of the Sorbitol Liquid Product worldwidemarketand as the agent for the sales of Sorbito!Powder Product for overseas market.Commission for Agenton Sorbitol Powder will be4% of Ex Plant Price; and the commission onSorbitol Liquid will be 2% of Ex Plant Price.Manufacturer will deduct applicable withholdingtax on such commission paid. Commission shal!
    Andy Hartanto, SH) Bukti PK10.Pada perjanjian tersebut disetujui halhal berikut ini:Tabel 6menjadi sebagaimana tercantum dalam SalinanKeterangan: Manufacturer (Pemohon) dan Agent(PT SAAC)Agency Agreement antara Pemohon dan PT SAAC Versi Bahasa InggrisVersi Bahasa Indonesia 1.Manufacturerhereby appoints Agent,and Agent hereby accepts appointmentas Agent for the sales of the SorbitolLiquid Product worldwide market andas the agent for the sales of SorbitolPowder Product for overseas market.Commission
Register : 18-08-2014 — Putus : 21-10-2014 — Upload : 06-01-2015
Putusan PA KAB MALANG Nomor 4589/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Kab.Mlg
Tanggal 21 Oktober 2014 — PENGGUGAT lawan TERGUGAT
5123
  • Coffey, Director of Holdiko, and PhiongPhillipus Dharma, Director of Holdiko, hereby certify for and onbehalf of Holdiko that subject to the Purchaser either waiving orbeing satisfied as to the fulfilment of the conditions precedent inSection 3.3 of the CSPLTA, the conditions precedent to therespective obligations of the Parties to close set forth in Section 3of the CSPLTA have been satisfied or have been waived by therespective Parties.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereuntosigned
Putus : 25-04-2017 — Upload : 31-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 689/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 25 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT LATEXCO INDONESIA
4418 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ,Ltd. antara lain diatur halhal sebagai berikut:Article 1 : ObjectHalaman 23 dari 34 halaman Putusan Nomor 689/B/PK/PJK/2017Latexco Indonesia/Pemohon Banding (LID) hereby appointsthe Latexco Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (LAP) as sole and exclusiveAGENT, who undertakes to market the productsmanufacturedand/or imported by the LID in accordance with the provisionsbelow.
Register : 01-05-2009 — Putus : 10-05-2010 — Upload : 15-06-2013
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1196/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 10 Mei 2010 —
8556
  • (afiliasi dari Penggugat) mengirimkan dana sejumlahUSD 2,100,000.00 (dua juta seratus ribu Dollar Amerika Serikat) ke Tergugat gunakeperluan penerbitan Bank Garansi Bank IFI tersebut ;Bahwa dalam paragraf ketiga Bank Garansi Bank IFI disebutkan :We hereby waive the rights and privileges to plead for seizure sale off assets ofthe THE ACCOUNTEE beffore the settlement of his debt as referred to and meantby Article 1832 of Indonesian Civil Code and engage to pay you immediatelywithout recourse upon your
Register : 04-02-2020 — Putus : 31-03-2020 — Upload : 31-03-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 98/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 31 Maret 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. LAYAR SENTOSA SHIPPING
Terbanding/Tergugat I : WALLEM & CO LIMITED
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WALLEM SENTOSA SHIPPING SERVICE
488890
  • Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan Pasal 2.1Joint Venture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Conditional upon the availability of all the necessary licenses,authorizations, consents or approvals of the relevant governmentalauthorities, the parties hereby agree to establish a joint venturebetween themselves under the proposed name "P. T.
    Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan dalam Pasal2.1 Joint Venture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Conditional upon the availability of all the necessary licenses,authorizations, consents or approvals of the relevant governmentalauthorities, the parties hereby agree to establish a joint venturebetween themselves under the proposed name "P. T.
Upload : 15-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 740 K/PDT.SUS/2010
PT. BALI TURTLE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT (PT. BTID); PENTA OCEAN CONTRUCTION, Co.Ltd
274370 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • timbul dari perjanjianPemohon dan Termohon, tanggal 9 Februari 2000, yaitu sebesarUS$ 16,158,683 (enam belas juta seratus lima puluh delapan ribuenam ratus delapan puluh tiga dolar Amerika) dan Rp. 796.695.864,(tujuh ratus sembilan puluh enam juta enam ratus sembilan puluhlima riobu delapan ratus enam puluh empat rupiah);Dalam perjanjian tersebut, dikutip :"Whereas, the Parties which had entered into Contract AgreementZone 11Dredging and Reclamation Works, dated 24'" November1995 (the Contract), hereby
    Bali Turtle Island Development of Wisma Dinners Club3A Floor, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 34, Jakarta 10220,Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as "BTID") as the other party;Whereas, the Parties which had entered into Contract AgreementZone 11Dredging and Reclamation Works, dated 24'" November1995 (the Contract), hereby agree and confirm the following :1) Certified Progress Amount of the Original US$ 32,046,229Bill of the Main Contract (as of Time of andSuspension of the Project at 30" September
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1948 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
4517 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1948/B/PK/PJK/2017bahwa berdasarkan COD tersebut, dinyatakan bahwa GFBVmerupakan residen Belanda sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 4P3B Indonesia Belanda;bahwa berdasarkan Declaration of Residence of GFBV pertanggal 07 Desember 2012, yang diterbitkan oleh Otoritas PajakBelanda, dinyatakan sebagai berikut.dengan kutipan sebagaiberikut:The undersigned, inspector of the Tax AdministrationRijnmond/kantoor Rotterdam, the Netherlands, hereby declaresthat:Goederhand Finance BV Tax id. nr: 813188155
Putus : 27-12-2012 — Upload : 18-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 631 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 27 Desember 2012 — HARVEY NICHOLS AND COMPANY LIMITED, suatu perseroan terbatas yang didirikan berdasarkan hukum Inggris (registrasi No. 1774537) vs 1. PT. HAMPARAN NUSANTARA; 2. PT. MITRA ADIPERKASA, Tbk;
679628 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Males cacatsecara hukum dan tidak memenuhi syaratsyarat Exclusive license agreement(perjanjian lisensi ekslusif) tertanggal 23 Januari 2007;Bahwa Pasal 15.2 Exclusive license agreement (perjanjian lisensi ekslusif)tertanggal 23 Januari 2007 menyatakan:Any dispute or difference arising out of or in connection with this Agreementshall be referred to the arbitration of a sole arbitrator to be appointed inaccordance with .16 (3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 ("the Act"), the seat of sucharbitration being hereby
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1949 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
5532 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • between the Netherland and the Republik ofIndonesia for the avoidance of double taxation...bahwa berdasarkan COD tersebut, dinyatakan bahwa GFBVmerupakan residen Belanda sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 4P3B Indonesia Belanda;bahwa berdasarkan Declaration of Residence of GFBV pertanggal 07 Desember 2012, yang diterbitkan oleh Otoritas PajakBelanda, dinyatakan sebagai berikut.dengan kutipan sebagaiberikut:The undersigned, inspector of the Tax AdministrationRijnmond/kantoor Rotterdam, the Netherlands, hereby
Register : 29-01-2021 — Putus : 18-08-2021 — Upload : 19-08-2021
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 124/Pdt.G/2021/PN Dps
Tanggal 18 Agustus 2021 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
13075
  • Whereas in order for the PLAINTIFFs claim not to become Illusoir in the18.future due to concerns based on the reasoned suspicion that theDEFENDANT will displace, transfer the Lease Rights of the object of theagreement, the PLAINTIFF hereby requests that the Denpasar DistrictCourt / Panel of Judges who examined this Case be pleased to first placeconfiscation guarantee for the Defendant's Land Lease Rights,according to the Land Lease Agreement Number: LEG 709 / VIII / 2019,dated 15 August 2019, which
Putus : 04-08-2011 — Upload : 02-04-2014
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 216/pdt.g/2011/pn.sby
Tanggal 4 Agustus 2011 — PT. LESTARI KARYA MAKMUR (penggugat) 1. PT. ASURANSI RAMA SATRIA WIBAWA CABANG SURABAYA (tergugat)
10451
  • Karena di dalam Dispute Clause (C)terdapat clausa yang menyatakan bahwa gugatan dapat diajukankePengadilan Negeri ;Settlement of Dispute (Court of Law) Clause ;It is hereby noted and agreed that the Insured and the Insurer shall settle the dispute throughCourt of Law where defendant resides ;Bahwa gugatan ini diajukan melalui Pengadilan Surabaya, oleh karena tempat dankedudukan dari pihak TERGUGAT I dan TERGUGAT II di Surabaya, maka PENGGUGATmemiliki pilihan Hukum untuk menggugat di daerah Hukum
Putus : 16-04-2014 — Upload : 16-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2882 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 16 April 2014 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK VS PT. NUBIKA JAYA, DKK.;
10251 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Joint Facilities:Where the Facility(ies) are being granted to two or more borrowers, theBorrowers hereby jointly agrees as follows:(a) Liability to be Joint and Several;All agreements, obligations, liabilities, representations, warranties andundertakings of the Borrowers are hereby agreed to be joint and several and shallbe construed accordingly;Terjemahannya:21.
Putus : 08-07-2015 — Upload : 19-08-2015
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 930 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN. Sby.
Tanggal 8 Juli 2015 — ZT HOLDING PTE. LTD., melawan 1. PT BANK RESONA PERDANIA dkk
7026
  • olehDepartemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, DirektoratJenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum (Sertifikat Fidusia) vide, Bukti P24 ;(selanjutnya poin (i) s/d (ix) di atas secara bersamasama akan disebut sebagai Jaminan) ;6 Bahwa sehubungan dengan Jaminan tersebut di atas, TERGUGAT I telah ditunjuk sebagai AgenJaminan oleh para kreditur TURUT TERGUGAT (kreditur pemegang jaminan/kreditur separatis )sebagaimana tertuang dalam Perjanjian Kredit, sebagai berikut:"35.1 The RA Lenders hereby
    (Untuk selanjutnya huruf a sampai dengan huruf i secara bersamasama akan disebut sebagai6 Bahwa benar berdasarkan Perjanjian Kredit sehubungan dengan Jaminan utang tersebut diatas,TERGUGAT I telah ditunjuk selaku Agen Jaminan oleh para kreditur TURUT TERGUGAT,sebagaimana tertuang dalam Perjanjian Kredit, sebagai berikut:"35.1 The RA Lenders hereby appoint the Security Agent, subject to and in accordance withthe terms and conditions of this Agreement and the other Restructuring Documents, to holdthe
    security interests constituted or to beconstituted by or under the Existing SecurityDocuments for and on behalf of the relevant Term Loan Lenders and accordingly eachTerm Loan Lender hereby appoints,... the Security Agent to act as its agent for the purposeof the signing, execution, registration, deregistration and the delivery of each of therelevant Existing Security Documents,..."
Register : 29-10-2015 — Putus : 18-12-2015 — Upload : 11-01-2016
Putusan PT PALEMBANG Nomor 100/PDT/2015/PT.PLG
Tanggal 18 Desember 2015 —
8672
  • If any matter is reviewed by arbitration pursuant to the Sales AgencyRules, The Agent hereby submits to arbitration in accordance withsuch rules and agrees to observe the procedures therein providedand to abide by any arbitration award made thereunderg Bahwa dengan telah di sepakatinya lembaga Arbitrase sebagailembaga yang berwenang menyelesaikan sengketa yang timbul sebagaiakibat dan perjanjian keagenan Aquo, maka secara hukum PengadilanNegeri Palembang tidak berwenang memeriksa perkara inih Bahwa
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 14-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 453/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — PT. CHAROEN POKPHAND INDONESIA, Tbk VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
13986 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Dibawah inidikutip ketentuan Pasal 2 Perjanjian Pengalihan Hak KekayaanIntelektual antara CPG dan CPIG:Pasal 2 Perjanjian Pengalihnan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (VideBukti PK5):Article 2Assigment2.1 In consideration of CPIG agreeing to license the CPIntellectual Proprietary Rights to CPI under theNovation Agreement and such other relatedagreements and documents to be executed by andbetween CPIG and CPI, CPG does hereby acceptthe assignment of the CP Intellectual Proprietaryrights from CPG.2.2 With