Ditemukan 330 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Upload : 25-01-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 868 K/PDT.SUS/2010
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK; TUNJUNG RAHMANTO SETYAWAN
213166 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Rusli Syahputra (theGuarantor), hereby unconditionally and irrevocably Guarantees to theBank, as a separate and independent obligation of the guarantor, the dueHal. 8 dari 28 hal. Put. No. 868 K/Pdt.Sus/2010punctual payment by the customer of all sums of whatsoever nature dueand/or become due from the customer under or pursuant the creditagreement, .......Yang dalam bahasa Indonesianya berdasarkan terjemahan dari Soesilo,Penterjemah Resmi dan Tersumpah, berdasarkan S.K.
Putus : 18-06-2013 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 730 K/Pdt/2012
Tanggal 18 Juni 2013 — SUJONO, PT. TOBU INDONESIA STEEL, ; THE HONGKONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED
9766 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sebagai berikut:a Notice of Early Termination, tertanggal 22 Desember 2008("Notice of Early Termination") (Vide Bukti T1 10); dan;b Settlement Letter, tertanggal 30 Desember 2008 ("SettlementLetter") (Vide Bukti T1 6);Bahwa, sebagaimana terlihat dalam Notice of Early Termination, surat Notice ofEarly Termination bukanlah merupakan surat penagihan sebagaimana disebutkan kigugatan PenggugatBahwa, surat Notice of Early Termination pada intinya menyatakan bahwa:Kindly note that with this letter we hereby
    Notice of Early Termination, tertanggal 22 Desember 2008 ("Notice of EarlyTermination") (Vide Bukti T2 9); danb Settlement Letter, tertanggal 30 Desember 2008 ("Settlement Letter") (Vide BuktiT2 6)Bahwa, sebagaimana terlihat dalam Notice of Early Termination, surat Notice ofEarly Termination tersebut bukanlah merupakan surat penagihan sebagaimanadisebutkan dalam gugatan Penggugat Dalam Konvensi;Bahwa surat Notice of Early Termination pada intinya menyatakan bahwa:Kindly note that with this letter we hereby
Putus : 15-11-2011 — Upload : 13-04-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 165 K/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 15 Nopember 2011 — PT.KALTIMEX JAYA VS INDOVER ASIA LIMITED dkk
8162 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • menghasilkan putusan tidak mempertimbangkan fakta dan buktibukti Pemohon Kasasi/Penggugat yangsangat merugikan Pemohon Kasasi/Penggugat ;Bahwa judex facti tidak mempertimbangkan pengajuan gugatan dalamperkara aquo yang didasarkan atas ketentuan pilinan forum sebagimanadiatur dalam Akta Nomor: 48 tentang Credit Agreement tertanggal 13Agustus 1993 yang dibuat di hadapan Ny.R..Arie Soetardjo,SH, Notarisdi Jakarta (vide P1.a, sesuai ketentuan Pasal 15 huruf (e) mengatursebagai berikut:"The Borrower hereby
Putus : 19-08-2008 — Upload : 21-01-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 445PK/PDT/2007
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2008 — BANK AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY ; MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, dkk. ; PT. INDAH KIAT PULP & PAPER Tbk ; THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, dkk.
483984 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pasal 11.8 Indenture Agreement (Vide Bukti T4 4):(i) Pasal 11.8 Perjanjian Indenture menentukan mengenai:"Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Immunities(a)(b)This Indenture (including the Guarantee) and the Notesshall be construed in accordance with and governed by thelaws of the State of New York;Each of the Issuer and the Guarantor hereby irrevocablyand unconditionally submits to the nonexclusive jurisdictionof any New York State or United States Federal court sittingin New York City
    Each of the Issuer and theGuarantor hereby , irrevocably appoints CT Corporation asits agent for such purpose, and covenants and agrees thatservice of process in any suit, action or proceeding may bemade upon it at the office of such agent at 1633 Broadway,New York, New York 10019.
    Pasal 7.07 Loan Agreement (Vide Bukti T4 5)(i)(ii)Pasal 707 Loan Agreement menyebutkan bahwa"Any legal action or proceeding against the Borrower withrespect to this Agreement or any other Credit Document may bebrought in the courts of the State of New York or of the UnitedStates for the Southern District of New York and, by executionand delivery of this Agreement, the Borrower hereby accepts foritself and in respect of its property, generally andunconditionally, the jurisdiction of the aforesaid
    No. 445 PK/Pdt/2007(ii)"Each of the Issuer and the Guarantors (a) agrees thot anyaction or proceeding brought by any Underwriter arising out ofor relating to this Agreement, the Indenture, the Notes or thecontemplated hereby and thereby may be instituted in any Statecourt in New York City, (b) irrevocably waives, to the it mayeffectively do so, any objection (i) which it may now or hereafterhave to the laying of the venue of any such suit, action orproceeding in any Federal or State court in New
    Pasal 7.07 Loan Agreement:Any legal action or proceeding against the Borrower with respectto this Agreement or any other Credit Document may be brought inthe courts of the State of New York or of the United States for theSouthern District of New York and, by execution and delivery ofthis Agreement, the Borrower hereby accepts for itself and inrespect of its property, generally and unconditionally, theJurisdiction of the aforesaid courts.
Putus : 03-02-2015 — Upload : 01-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 939/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 3 Februari 2015 — PT. SORINI TOWA BERLIAN CORPORINDO vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
11698 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Manufacturer hereby appoints Agent, and Agenthereby accepts appointment as Agent for thesales of the Sorbitol Liquid Product worldwidemarketand as the agent for the sales of Sorbito!Powder Product for overseas market.Commission for Agenton Sorbitol Powder will be4% of Ex Plant Price; and the commission onSorbitol Liquid will be 2% of Ex Plant Price.Manufacturer will deduct applicable withholdingtax on such commission paid. Commission shal!
    Andy Hartanto, SH) Bukti PK10.Pada perjanjian tersebut disetujui halhal berikut ini:Tabel 6menjadi sebagaimana tercantum dalam SalinanKeterangan: Manufacturer (Pemohon) dan Agent(PT SAAC)Agency Agreement antara Pemohon dan PT SAAC Versi Bahasa InggrisVersi Bahasa Indonesia 1.Manufacturerhereby appoints Agent,and Agent hereby accepts appointmentas Agent for the sales of the SorbitolLiquid Product worldwide market andas the agent for the sales of SorbitolPowder Product for overseas market.Commission
Register : 18-08-2014 — Putus : 21-10-2014 — Upload : 06-01-2015
Putusan PA KAB MALANG Nomor 4589/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Kab.Mlg
Tanggal 21 Oktober 2014 — PENGGUGAT lawan TERGUGAT
5326
  • Coffey, Director of Holdiko, and PhiongPhillipus Dharma, Director of Holdiko, hereby certify for and onbehalf of Holdiko that subject to the Purchaser either waiving orbeing satisfied as to the fulfilment of the conditions precedent inSection 3.3 of the CSPLTA, the conditions precedent to therespective obligations of the Parties to close set forth in Section 3of the CSPLTA have been satisfied or have been waived by therespective Parties.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereuntosigned
Putus : 04-08-2011 — Upload : 02-04-2014
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 216/pdt.g/2011/pn.sby
Tanggal 4 Agustus 2011 — PT. LESTARI KARYA MAKMUR (penggugat) 1. PT. ASURANSI RAMA SATRIA WIBAWA CABANG SURABAYA (tergugat)
11051
  • Karena di dalam Dispute Clause (C)terdapat clausa yang menyatakan bahwa gugatan dapat diajukankePengadilan Negeri ;Settlement of Dispute (Court of Law) Clause ;It is hereby noted and agreed that the Insured and the Insurer shall settle the dispute throughCourt of Law where defendant resides ;Bahwa gugatan ini diajukan melalui Pengadilan Surabaya, oleh karena tempat dankedudukan dari pihak TERGUGAT I dan TERGUGAT II di Surabaya, maka PENGGUGATmemiliki pilihan Hukum untuk menggugat di daerah Hukum
Register : 30-09-2020 — Putus : 21-12-2020 — Upload : 23-12-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 575/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 21 Desember 2020 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : RELIANCE COAL RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED
Pembanding/Tergugat II : MUKUND MADHUSUDAN DONGRE
Pembanding/Tergugat III : RELIANCE POWER NETHERLAND B.V.
Pembanding/Tergugat IV : PT. AVANESH COAL RESOURCES
Pembanding/Tergugat V : PT. SUMUKHA COAL SERVICES
Pembanding/Tergugat VI : PT. HERAMBA COAL RESOURCES
Terbanding/Penggugat I : KOKOS JIANG
Terbanding/Penggugat II : RUSLI
Terbanding/Penggugat III : JUUL RUMAMBI
Terbanding/Penggugat IV : PRESTIGE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD.
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat I : MALA MUKTI, SH., LLM.
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II : PT. SRIWIJAYA BINTANG TIGA ENERGI
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat III : PT. BRAYAN BINTANG TIGA ENERGI,
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat IV : PT. SUGICO PENDRAGON ENERGY
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat V : KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA REPUBLIK INDONESIA CQ. DIREKTORAT JENDERAL ADMINISTRASI HUKUM UMUM
452247
  • The Payee hereby authorizes the Payer to directly deduct theamount of the arrangement fee from the First Advance as part of thedisbursement of the First Advance.Halaman 13 Putusan .No. 575/Pdt/2020/PT.DKI.31.32:33.Mengacu pada Pasal 2.2 tersebut, dapat dilinat bahwa nilai jual beli sahamyang keselurunhannya adalah USD 200,000 (dua ratus ribu Dollar AmerikaSerikat) yang sebelumnya telah diterima oleh Penggugat 1, ternyatakemudian harus dikembalikan lagi kepada Tergugat dengan caradipotong dari uang
Register : 04-02-2020 — Putus : 31-03-2020 — Upload : 31-03-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 98/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 31 Maret 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. LAYAR SENTOSA SHIPPING
Terbanding/Tergugat I : WALLEM & CO LIMITED
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WALLEM SENTOSA SHIPPING SERVICE
499914
  • Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan Pasal 2.1Joint Venture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Conditional upon the availability of all the necessary licenses,authorizations, consents or approvals of the relevant governmentalauthorities, the parties hereby agree to establish a joint venturebetween themselves under the proposed name "P. T.
    Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan dalam Pasal2.1 Joint Venture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Conditional upon the availability of all the necessary licenses,authorizations, consents or approvals of the relevant governmentalauthorities, the parties hereby agree to establish a joint venturebetween themselves under the proposed name "P. T.
Putus : 25-04-2017 — Upload : 31-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 689/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 25 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT LATEXCO INDONESIA
4418 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ,Ltd. antara lain diatur halhal sebagai berikut:Article 1 : ObjectHalaman 23 dari 34 halaman Putusan Nomor 689/B/PK/PJK/2017Latexco Indonesia/Pemohon Banding (LID) hereby appointsthe Latexco Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (LAP) as sole and exclusiveAGENT, who undertakes to market the productsmanufacturedand/or imported by the LID in accordance with the provisionsbelow.
Register : 01-05-2009 — Putus : 10-05-2010 — Upload : 15-06-2013
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1196/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 10 Mei 2010 —
8958
  • (afiliasi dari Penggugat) mengirimkan dana sejumlahUSD 2,100,000.00 (dua juta seratus ribu Dollar Amerika Serikat) ke Tergugat gunakeperluan penerbitan Bank Garansi Bank IFI tersebut ;Bahwa dalam paragraf ketiga Bank Garansi Bank IFI disebutkan :We hereby waive the rights and privileges to plead for seizure sale off assets ofthe THE ACCOUNTEE beffore the settlement of his debt as referred to and meantby Article 1832 of Indonesian Civil Code and engage to pay you immediatelywithout recourse upon your
Register : 29-01-2021 — Putus : 18-08-2021 — Upload : 19-08-2021
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 124/Pdt.G/2021/PN Dps
Tanggal 18 Agustus 2021 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
13478
  • Whereas in order for the PLAINTIFFs claim not to become Illusoir in the18.future due to concerns based on the reasoned suspicion that theDEFENDANT will displace, transfer the Lease Rights of the object of theagreement, the PLAINTIFF hereby requests that the Denpasar DistrictCourt / Panel of Judges who examined this Case be pleased to first placeconfiscation guarantee for the Defendant's Land Lease Rights,according to the Land Lease Agreement Number: LEG 709 / VIII / 2019,dated 15 August 2019, which
Register : 17-10-2017 — Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1949 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. TAPIAN NADENGGAN;
5833 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • between the Netherland and the Republik ofIndonesia for the avoidance of double taxation...bahwa berdasarkan COD tersebut, dinyatakan bahwa GFBVmerupakan residen Belanda sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 4P3B Indonesia Belanda;bahwa berdasarkan Declaration of Residence of GFBV pertanggal 07 Desember 2012, yang diterbitkan oleh Otoritas PajakBelanda, dinyatakan sebagai berikut.dengan kutipan sebagaiberikut:The undersigned, inspector of the Tax AdministrationRijnmond/kantoor Rotterdam, the Netherlands, hereby
Putus : 16-04-2014 — Upload : 16-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2882 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 16 April 2014 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK VS PT. NUBIKA JAYA, DKK.;
10855 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Joint Facilities:Where the Facility(ies) are being granted to two or more borrowers, theBorrowers hereby jointly agrees as follows:(a) Liability to be Joint and Several;All agreements, obligations, liabilities, representations, warranties andundertakings of the Borrowers are hereby agreed to be joint and several and shallbe construed accordingly;Terjemahannya:21.
Upload : 15-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 740 K/PDT.SUS/2010
PT. BALI TURTLE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT (PT. BTID); PENTA OCEAN CONTRUCTION, Co.Ltd
283375 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • timbul dari perjanjianPemohon dan Termohon, tanggal 9 Februari 2000, yaitu sebesarUS$ 16,158,683 (enam belas juta seratus lima puluh delapan ribuenam ratus delapan puluh tiga dolar Amerika) dan Rp. 796.695.864,(tujuh ratus sembilan puluh enam juta enam ratus sembilan puluhlima riobu delapan ratus enam puluh empat rupiah);Dalam perjanjian tersebut, dikutip :"Whereas, the Parties which had entered into Contract AgreementZone 11Dredging and Reclamation Works, dated 24'" November1995 (the Contract), hereby
    Bali Turtle Island Development of Wisma Dinners Club3A Floor, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 34, Jakarta 10220,Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as "BTID") as the other party;Whereas, the Parties which had entered into Contract AgreementZone 11Dredging and Reclamation Works, dated 24'" November1995 (the Contract), hereby agree and confirm the following :1) Certified Progress Amount of the Original US$ 32,046,229Bill of the Main Contract (as of Time of andSuspension of the Project at 30" September
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 14-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 453/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — PT. CHAROEN POKPHAND INDONESIA, Tbk VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
14590 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Dibawah inidikutip ketentuan Pasal 2 Perjanjian Pengalihan Hak KekayaanIntelektual antara CPG dan CPIG:Pasal 2 Perjanjian Pengalihnan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (VideBukti PK5):Article 2Assigment2.1 In consideration of CPIG agreeing to license the CPIntellectual Proprietary Rights to CPI under theNovation Agreement and such other relatedagreements and documents to be executed by andbetween CPIG and CPI, CPG does hereby acceptthe assignment of the CP Intellectual Proprietaryrights from CPG.2.2 With
Register : 29-10-2015 — Putus : 18-12-2015 — Upload : 11-01-2016
Putusan PT PALEMBANG Nomor 100/PDT/2015/PT.PLG
Tanggal 18 Desember 2015 —
8872
  • If any matter is reviewed by arbitration pursuant to the Sales AgencyRules, The Agent hereby submits to arbitration in accordance withsuch rules and agrees to observe the procedures therein providedand to abide by any arbitration award made thereunderg Bahwa dengan telah di sepakatinya lembaga Arbitrase sebagailembaga yang berwenang menyelesaikan sengketa yang timbul sebagaiakibat dan perjanjian keagenan Aquo, maka secara hukum PengadilanNegeri Palembang tidak berwenang memeriksa perkara inih Bahwa
Register : 22-11-2017 — Putus : 20-11-2017 — Upload : 22-11-2017
Putusan PT BANTEN Nomor 107/PDT/2017/PT BTN
Tanggal 20 Nopember 2017 — PT. BUANA LISTYA TAMA, Tbk , Berkedudukan di Jalan Mega Kuningan Timur Blok C6 Kav. 12a, Kawasan Mega Kuningan, Kelurahan Kuningan Timur, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Jakarta Selatan. dalam hal ini memberikan kuasa kepada Azmara Dhana, SH., Mardiana Arfah, SH., Rian Alvin, SH., dan Flora Angelia, BSc. beralamat di Jalan Mega Kuningan Timur Blok C6 Kav. 12a, Kawasan Mega Kuningan, Kelurahan Kuningan Timur, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Jakarta Selatan. berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tanggal 5 Januari 2017, yang telah didaftar dikepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri serang pada tanggal 6 Januari 2017 dibawah nomor 01/01/SK.HUK/Pdt/17/PNS. Selanjutnya disebut sebagai Pembanding/ Penggugat; L A W A N: 1. PT ARGHANIAGA PANCATUNGGAL, Bertempat tinggal di Perum Arga Baja Pura, Jl. Arga Gede Blok D1 No.3, Kotasari Cilegon, Banten, Selanjutnya disebut Sebagai Terbanding I /Tergugat I; 2. PT HOKARI LINEX PRATAMA, Bertempat tinggal di Jalan. Pahlawan Seribu Ruko Bsd Sektor Vii Blok Rn No.58-59 Lengkong Wetan, Serpong Tangerang Selatan., Selanjutnya disebut Sebagai Terbanding II /Tergugat II ; Dalam hal ini Terbanding I/Tergugat I dan Terbanding II/Tergugat II. Kuasanya PAULUS J. KARU, SH advokat pada Kantor Advokat dan Konsultan Hukum dari Chripa Law Office, beralamat di Jalan Pahlawan Seribu Ruko Sektor VII BSD RN No. 58-59, Lengkong Wetan, Serpong, berdasarkan surat kuasa khusus tanggal 23 Januari 2017, yang telah didaftarkan dikepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Serang tertanggal 14 Pebruari 2017, dibawah nomor 50/16/SK.HUK/Pdt/17/PNS;
218250
  • Gusti Agung Ngurah Ardika, Master of MT Gas Maluku, onbehalf of ship owner/management/parties concerned, hereby hold yourfull responsibility for all losses, damages, etc. receiving the right inextend the same at time and place convenient ;Terjemahan bebasnya :Kapal kami MT Gas Maluku, pada pelayaran ke 17/14, dalam kondisikosong tanpa muatan (hanya ballast) setelah membongkar (kargo) dipelabuhan Gresik datang untuk menurunkan jangkarnya di areaberlabuh pada Pelabuhan Merak dengan posisi GPS pada
Putus : 08-07-2015 — Upload : 19-08-2015
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 930 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN. Sby.
Tanggal 8 Juli 2015 — ZT HOLDING PTE. LTD., melawan 1. PT BANK RESONA PERDANIA dkk
8026
  • olehDepartemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, DirektoratJenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum (Sertifikat Fidusia) vide, Bukti P24 ;(selanjutnya poin (i) s/d (ix) di atas secara bersamasama akan disebut sebagai Jaminan) ;6 Bahwa sehubungan dengan Jaminan tersebut di atas, TERGUGAT I telah ditunjuk sebagai AgenJaminan oleh para kreditur TURUT TERGUGAT (kreditur pemegang jaminan/kreditur separatis )sebagaimana tertuang dalam Perjanjian Kredit, sebagai berikut:"35.1 The RA Lenders hereby
    (Untuk selanjutnya huruf a sampai dengan huruf i secara bersamasama akan disebut sebagai6 Bahwa benar berdasarkan Perjanjian Kredit sehubungan dengan Jaminan utang tersebut diatas,TERGUGAT I telah ditunjuk selaku Agen Jaminan oleh para kreditur TURUT TERGUGAT,sebagaimana tertuang dalam Perjanjian Kredit, sebagai berikut:"35.1 The RA Lenders hereby appoint the Security Agent, subject to and in accordance withthe terms and conditions of this Agreement and the other Restructuring Documents, to holdthe
    security interests constituted or to beconstituted by or under the Existing SecurityDocuments for and on behalf of the relevant Term Loan Lenders and accordingly eachTerm Loan Lender hereby appoints,... the Security Agent to act as its agent for the purposeof the signing, execution, registration, deregistration and the delivery of each of therelevant Existing Security Documents,..."
Register : 22-09-2021 — Putus : 16-12-2021 — Upload : 16-12-2021
Putusan PT MEDAN Nomor 392/Pdt/2021/PT MDN
Tanggal 16 Desember 2021 — Identitas Pihak Tidak Dipublikasi
14180
  • ., SNP 149/60 Republic of Slovakta hereinafter refered to as "Principal),hereby choose the legal domicile at the attorneyb office and grants full authority to:Ranap H.