Ditemukan 2113 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : watch white whini whim weich wacih whidi wich winch
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pidana Khusus
Putus : 29-04-2009 — Upload : 03-11-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 731K/PIDSUS/2009
Tanggal 29 April 2009 — JAT LIE CHANDRA alias CECE
92 — 51 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For, if the state were to resort to killing in orderto enforce its will, it would legitimize the very behavior which the law sought torepress, namely the use of deadly force to settle disputes " ;Secara keilmuan, argumen Cesare Beccaria tersebut sangat menarik dan dapatdibenarkan sebagai dasar pijakan kerangka konseptual untuk menganalisislebin lanjut mengenai utilitas dan implementasi pidana mati.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 811/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. Pertamina (Persero) vs. Direktur Jenderal Pajak
42 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalde to the Laiqeefaction Company pursigut te Seeclinn G1, nelBholl advise the Trustee of such procedures whieh sholl inelude o requircenenl that the Liquefaction Compouny farnish the Tresor wilh weacknowledstient that each poyevnt by the Tras lereumber fullysatistics tee linkililies of erlamina or the Contractors, as the case may be, will respect to thq.invoies to which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 04-12-2017 — Upload : 24-04-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1300 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017
Tanggal 4 Desember 2017 — EIK ENGINEERING SDN. BHD VS PT ENGINEERING INDONESIA KARYA
494 — 305 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 1300 K/Pat.SusHKI/2017IRE JebStreet conn ; o Search i Einpinyer=PT Engineering Indonesia KaryaOD @ Gy = Cempany OverviewPUP rgietaeiesg (rinictinenrn Sebagaimana dapat dicermati dari lowongan kerja di atas, Tergugat secaraterangterangan mengaku sebagai distributor resmi Penggugat di Indonesia.Berikut adalah kutipan informasi yang relevan dengan perkara a quo;PT Engineering Indonesia Karya, the premium supplier which focusingon marketing the heavy construction equipment, especially theattachment
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Pidana Khusus Korupsi
Putus : 21-03-2013 — Upload : 03-06-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 72/PID.B/TPK/2012/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 21 Maret 2013 — HENDRO TIRTAJAYA
139 — 82
  • have a problem for the year 2003, because theyalready finished the tax audit, and they will faced that situation andmake a revised on the result of tax audit 2003, the impact for PT.MV,they said that the better they can not help PTMV at all, and declareeverything, because they have enough problem because of the revisedthe tax audit 2003, and if they helo PTMV another think will be rise aquestion from they internal affairs;Tax officer will be issued additional tax assessment with additionalpenalty which
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Pidana Umum Pra Peradilan
Register : 01-03-2016 — Putus : 30-03-2016 — Upload : 07-09-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 28/Pid.Pra./2016/PN Jkt Sel
Tanggal 30 Maret 2016 — EDDY ZAKARIA, bertempat tinggal di Villa Kelapa Dua Blok G88 Rt. 004/Rw. 007 Kecamatan Kebon Jeruk Jakarta Barat, dalam perkara ini diwakili oleh kuasanya Dr. H. Eggi Sudjana, S.H., M.Si., Hizbullah Ashiddiqi, S.H., M.H. dan Dicky Siahaan, S.H., M.H., para advokad dan Konsultan Hukum pada Law Firm “EGGI SUDJANA & PARTNERS”, beralamat di Jl. Tanah Abang III No. 19 CD, Tanah Abang Jakarta Pusat, berdasarkan surat kuasa Khusus Nomor 022/ESP-DS/SK/II/2016, tertanggal 22 Februari 2016, selanjutnya disebut Pemohon ; Melawan: Kepala Kepolisian Republik Indonesia (KAPOLRI), yang beralamat di Jalan Trunojoyo 3, Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Selatan, selanjutnya disebut Termohon;
556 — 409
  • /aw which hears before it condem, whichproceeds upon inquity, and renders judgement only after tnal. Pada dasarnyayang menjadi titik sentral adalah perlindungan hakhak asasi individu terhadaparbritrary action of government. Oleh karena itu, praperadilan memiliki peranyang penting untuk menimalisir penyimpangan dan penyalahgunaan wewenang(abuse of power) dalam pelaksanaan proses penegakan hukum.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 810/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
44 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • apon receiptef notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of swch invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrasters shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalde to the Liqeefoction Company peocsurt te Section G1, nolphall advise tle Trostes of such procolurea which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 805/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the DPodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds 10poayalice to the Taquefoction Company pours te Aeclinn G1, nodBiol advise the Trustee of such presedures which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 21-03-2017 — Putus : 25-04-2017 — Upload : 18-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 584 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 25 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SIKA INDONESIA;
57 — 28 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If the activity isnot one for which the independent enterprise would havebeen willing to pay or perform for itself, the activityordinarily should not be considered as an intragroupservice under the arms length principle.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA UTARA Perdata
Register : 11-02-2021 — Putus : 23-12-2021 — Upload : 03-01-2022
Putusan PN JAKARTA UTARA Nomor 100/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Utr
Tanggal 23 Desember 2021 — Penggugat:
PT Griff Prima Abadi
Tergugat:
1.PT Kartika Eka Yudha Maritim
2.PT Cargoport Indonesia
3.PT ASURANSI DAYIN MITRA, Tbk.
121 — 81
  • In case of a multimodal transport and if the place of damage orloss of the Goods is known, the responsibility of the carrier is determined bythe law which applies to this leg of carriage.Bahwa merujuk dari Bill Of Lading Point 11 angka 1 yang bertanggungjawab atas kerusakan barang dalam waktu pengiriman adalahpengangkut yaitu Pihak Saco Shipping Line LTD Agent dari CargoportIndonesia yang ada di Hamburg;10.
Pengadilan PN SUNGAI LIAT Pidana Khusus
Register : 10-04-2018 — Putus : 23-04-2018 — Upload : 13-08-2021
Putusan PN SUNGAI LIAT Nomor 1/Pid.Pra/2018/PN Sgl
Tanggal 23 April 2018 — Pemohon:
KASMAN BIN ABAS
Termohon:
Pemerintah Negara RI Cq.Kepolisian Resor Bangka Barat,Cq.Kepolisian sektor Mentok
60 — 7
  • Due process of law pada dasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai ruleof law, akan tetapi merupakan unsur yang esensial penyelenggaraanperadilan yang intinya adalah bahwa ia merupakan ...a law which bearsbefore in condemus, wich process upon inquiry, and renden judgement onlyafter trial... pada dasarnya yang menjadi titik sentaral adalah perlindunganhakhak asasi individu terhadap arbitary action of government.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 809/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrasters shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10ayaide to the Taquefaction Company puesaiut toe Sieeclina Gl, amlol advise the Trustee of such procedures which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 21-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2107 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. AMP PLANTATION;
31 — 21 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 2107/B/PK/PJK/2017bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects theeconomic system within which it is situated" (Morris and Murphy);bahwa menurut metode tersebut pembuatan suatu aturan(perundangundangan) bertujuan untuk mencapai efisiensi danmaksimisasi kekayaan serta manfaat
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata Khusus PHI
Putus : 18-01-2017 — Upload : 25-07-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 212/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 18 Januari 2017 —
122 — 47
  • Bahwa selanjutnya Pasal 10.2 Contract of Employment 2014 menentukansebagai berikut:Should you have any business interest or additional business oroccupation which may be deemed to conflict wth the interest of theCompany or any of its Affiliates, you wil be expected to declare thisimmediately even if such interest is carried out only in between projects oroutside office hours. Time off for public duties wil not be unreasonablywthheld.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 14-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 813/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (Persero) vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
36 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • 6.2,62 Partamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalde to the Laqeefaction Company pest toe Seelinan 1, nolBhall advise the Trustee of such procedures whieh shall inelude o requirceoent that the Liquefaction Comping furnish the Troslee wilh ae acknowledsnient that each payee by the Pease Iecewnbor Fullysatisfies theo linkililies of Dertacnina er the Coulractors, as the casemay bo, will respect to thq.invoies to which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 21-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2108 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. AMP PLANTATION
28 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • penerimaan negara agar pembangunan nasional dapatdilaksanakan secara mandir;bahwa dalam teori hukum khususnya terkait dengan pembuatanperaturan perundangundangan dikenal metode "Law andEconomis/Economis Analysis of Law";bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects theeconomic system within which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 12-10-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1677/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 12 Oktober 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. AMP PLANTATION
27 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1677/B/PK/PJK/2017bahwa dalam teori hukum khususnya terkait dengan pembuatanperaturan perundangundangan dikenal metode "Law andEconomis/Economis Analysis of Law";bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects the economicsystem within which it is situated" (Morris and Murphy);
Pengadilan PN SEKAYU Pidana Umum Penganiayaan
Register : 04-12-2010 — Putus : 25-04-2011 — Upload : 07-07-2015
Putusan PN SEKAYU Nomor 167/Pid/B/2011/PN.SKY
Tanggal 25 April 2011 — EDI SETIAWAN alias EDI bin KARDI
64 — 23
  • Penalaran hukum (legal reasoning) menurut Neil MacCormic adalah one branch of practical reasoning, which is the application by humans of their reason todeciding how it is right to conduct themselves in situations of choice yang menurut batasan4445ini bahwa Hukum adalah alat berpikir praktis (untuk mengubah keadaan), bukan sekedarberpikir teoretis (untuk menambah pengetahuan).Menimbang, bahwa Penasihat Hukum terdakwa menyatakan dalam notapembelaannya bahwa terdakwa EDI SETIAWAN alias EDI bin KARDI
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 17-04-2017 — Putus : 24-05-2017 — Upload : 17-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 886 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 24 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BERSAMA SEJAHTERA SAKTI;
19 — 7 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • penerimaan negara agarpembangunan nasional dapat dilaksanakan secara mandiri;Bahwa dalam teori hukum khususnya terkait dengan pembuatan peraturanperundangundangan dikenal metode "Law and Economis/EconomisAnalysis of Law';Bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah "In brief, thismethod applies the tool of economic analysis to law with a focus on the feemarket's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utility maximization (it is being saidthat the law simply reflects the economics system within which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Hak Uji Materiil
Putus : 08-04-2015 — Upload : 15-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 08 P/HUM/2015
Tanggal 8 April 2015 — PERKUMPULAN INDONESIA CORRUPTION WATCH (ICW vs MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA REPUBLIK INDONESIA
68 — 8 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The rule of law sendiri dimaknai sebagai alegal system in which rules are clear, wellunderstood, and fairly enforcedsebuah sistem hukum yang jelas~ (kecil kemungkinan untukdisalahgunakan), mudah dipahami, dan menjaga tegaknya keadilan.Kepastian hukum menjadi salah ciri the rule of law, yang di dalamnyamengandung asas legalitas, prediktibilitas, dan transparansi;Bahwa kepastian hukum atau /egal certainty dalam tradisi klasik the rule oflaw menurut pendapat dari Friedrrich von Hayek adalah salah satu
Pengadilan PTUN PEKAN BARU TUN
Register : 03-01-2018 — Putus : 23-04-2018 — Upload : 05-06-2018
Putusan PTUN PEKAN BARU Nomor 1/G/2018/PTUN.PBR
Tanggal 23 April 2018 — Penggugat:
Drs. ABDUL HAKIM AKT
Tergugat:
KEPALA BADAN PENGAWAS KEUANGAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN PERWAKILAN PROVINSI RIAU
181 — 103
  • Arens dan James K.Loebbecke dalam Bukunya Auditing An Itegrated Approach yangHalaman 127 dari 193 halaman Putusan Nomor 1/G/2018/PTUN.PBRditerbitkan oleh Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, halaman 171172 dinyatakan:In deciding which audit procedures to use, there are seven broadcategories of evidence from which the auditor can choose.