Ditemukan 2114 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 03-08-2021 — Putus : 14-09-2021 — Upload : 17-09-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 80/Pid.Pra/2021/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 14 September 2021 — Pemohon:
ALBERT HANY KALOH
Termohon:
1.Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia
2.KEPALA KEJAKSAAN TINGGI GORONTALO
9977
  • Karakteristik pelaku kejahatankorupsi yang demikian itu, sebagaimana yang dikemukakan Edwin H.Sutherland yang mengartikan the white collar crime sebagai: ...of crime in theupper, or white collar class, which is composed of respectable, or at leastrespected, bussines and professional men... (Gilbert Geis and Robert F.Meier: 1977, 38).Sejalan dengan itu, Prof.
Putus : 19-03-2012 — Upload : 30-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1572 K/Pdt/2011
Tanggal 19 Maret 2012 — PT. KARYA BANGUN MANDIRI vs PT. TOYOPLAST MANUFACTURING INDONESIA,dk
11178 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • proyek) ialah: Mr.Tan Heng Yong ;Bahwa setelah Akta Perjanjian (vide: P19) dibuat antara Tergugat I denganTergugat II, telah terjadi perubahanperubahan pada Spesifikasi Teknis danSistem Pembayaran atas keinginan sepihak dan Tergugat I yaitu sebelumnyadalam SPK bersifat unit price, "pembayaran progress bulanan berdasarkantagihan, dimana pembayaran akan dilakukan 2 (dua) minggu setelah tagihantersebut disetujui" (angka 2 huruf (c) SPK), selengkapnya berbunyi : Monthly progress based on invoices in which
Putus : 01-08-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 239/Pdt.G/2017/PN Tng
Tanggal 1 Agustus 2017 — GUNAWAN HALIM lawan PT. ISS FACILITY SERVICES
624251
  • TngArbitration Board (BANI and the Rules) for the conduct ofinternational arbitrations for the time being in force, which rules aredeemed to be incorporated by reference in this Article.
Register : 14-05-2019 — Putus : 14-10-2019 — Upload : 22-10-2019
Putusan PN Nanga Bulik Nomor 11/Pdt.G/2019/PN Ngb
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2019 — Penggugat:
RISMALAWATI
Tergugat:
1.PERSEROAN TERBATAS PT. MITRA PINASTHIKA MUSTIKA FINANCE
2.KEPALA KEPOLISIAN RESOR LAMANDAU
12553
  • Newsletter, No.38/X/September/ 1999, halaman 18); Bahwa sudah sangat jelas apabila gugatan yangdidalilkan oleh Penggugat hanyalah upaya untukmencari keuntungan semata dan tanpa dasar hukumyang jelas dan bahkan mengadaada denganmengaburkan fakta hukum yang sesungguhnyadimana sebenarnya Penggugat terbukti telahmelakukan perbuatan WANPRESTASI;Hal ini dapat pula dikatakan sebagai / exationsProceeding, menurut http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VexatiousLitgation yaitu :Vexatious Litigation is legal action which
Register : 22-12-2011 — Putus : 08-03-2012 — Upload : 19-06-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 680/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 8 Maret 2012 —
239148
  • pada intinya mengatur, bahwa jika terjadi perselisihanantara Pemohon dan Turut Termohon tidak dapat diselesaikan secaramusyawarah, maka perselisihan tersebut harus diajukan kepada BadanAribtrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI);Untuk lebih jelas mengenai hal di atas di bawah ini adalahpengaturan dalam EOR Contract :Pasal 12.2 EOR Contract :Disputes, if any, arising between PERTAMINA and Contractorrelating to this contract or the interpretation and performance of anyof the clauses of this contract, and which
Putus : 17-10-2011 — Upload : 06-03-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 595 K/PDT.SUS/2011
Tanggal 17 Oktober 2011 — WEN KEN DRUG, CO. PTE. LTD.; TJIOE BUDI YUWONO / BUDI YUWONO
300194 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • for making beverages;mineral and aerated waters being goods in class 32;e Di New ZealandCertified of Trade Mark Registration dikeluarkan oleh Commissioner of Patents,Trade Marks and Designs Ministry of Economic Development IntellectualProperty Office of New Zealand dengan Nomor 718394, tanggal 13 September2004 dengan Nama Pendaftar Tjioe Budi Yuwono (Penggugat) untuk KELASBARANG 05 dan 32, dengan merek the applicant advises that the transliterationof the Chinese characters in the mark is XI NIU, which
Register : 07-12-2017 — Putus : 21-02-2018 — Upload : 26-02-2018
Putusan PN BONTANG Nomor 160/Pid.B/2017/PN Bon
Tanggal 21 Februari 2018 — Penuntut Umum:
R. JOHARCA DWIPUTRA,
Terdakwa:
1.YUDI PRASTIO Bin MUHAMMAD NASRUN
2.JALAL Alias TOROBINGI Bin Alm ALI
3.BAHRUN Bin Alm MUHAMMAD
4.NURDIN RASYID Bin ABDUL RASYID CAPENRANG
10639
  • utilities, storag tanks, loading lines andarms, harbor, docks, berths, tug boats, residential community,workshops, offices, fixed plant and equipment and sommunicationsystem, together with replacements, improvements additions andexpansions of all such facilities, including the expansion facilities,together also with Natural Gas Transmission lines extending from theDelivery Points (As defined in the amended and Restated BontangProcessing Agreement) and form such other points in other fieldsfrom which
Putus : 11-08-2016 — Upload : 15-08-2016
Putusan PT DENPASAR Nomor 81/PDT/2016/PT.DPS
Tanggal 11 Agustus 2016 — PT. MACCARONI sebagai Pembanding L a w a n : 1. PT. AMBARA PRANATA sebagai Terbanding 2. I NYOMAN GEDE ANGGARA MARTA atau ditulis ING ANGGARA MARTA sebagai Turut Terbanding
171100
  • milik Tergugat II bersamaPenggugat, dengan demikian nampak ada itikad tidak baik dariTergugat I, atau juga adanya suatu kesepakatan yang tidak murnikarena kesepakatan tersebut diberikan karena adanya kekhilafanbersama (common mistake) (dwaling/mistake) sehingga oleh karenaitu segala tindakan Tergugat I bersamasama Tergugat II selakupenyewa tidak layak dilindungi olehRestatement Second Section 152 menyatakan : where a mistake ofboth parties at the time of contract was made as to a basicassumption on which
Register : 05-01-2017 — Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 135 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 — PT. PLN (PERSERO) KANTOR PUSAT VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
12387 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Incidently, in such cases, the factual Circumstance ofeach individual case are of crucial importance, which make itdifficult to provide more precise description;(the meaning of) the term "beneficial owner" ininternational taxlaw is strongly determined by factual circumstances. It Istherefore not possible to give further meaning to this term ingeneral manner.
Putus : 28-06-2012 — Upload : 19-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 294 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 28 Juni 2012 — KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA REPUBLIK INDONESIA (KPPU) vs PT. PFIZER INDONESIA dkk
410488 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The letter, which is date,EPFL!1b, reelved in the mai on Seatember 1,rvision of business Cempetitios (the KPPLU") of hevory roatip:, showing 2c dee the Jeter aes rereved,jay, August 27, 2010 invites ovr chert to vist theC10, 50% sehingga memenuhi kriteria posisi dominan ; Pangsa Pasar Norvask Periode eS Pangsa PasarBahwa Berdasarkan data tersebut, pangsa pasar Norvask sepanjangperiode 20002007 mencapai di atas 50%.
Putus : 25-10-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1585 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 25 Oktober 2017 — PT. ECS INDO JAYA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
268107 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • or other dispositions of any suchproperty or rights to the extent that the amounts realized on such sale,exchange or other disposition for consideration are contingent on theproductivity, use, or disposition of such property or rights;(b) The term "royalties" as used in this Article also includes paymentsby a resident of one of the Contracting States for the use of or the rightto use, industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, but not includingships, aircraft or containers the income from which
Putus : 30-03-2015 — Upload : 23-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 300 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 30 Maret 2015 —
237197 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Konsultan Senior Bank Dunia tanggal 18 September 1998 yang padapokoknya menerangkan sebagai berikut: was so impressed by the lop of the art plants that were shown to me....which equipment was purchased wth the funding provided by the WorldBank through BNI. have rarely seen such a vell designed and operatedindustrial jewel" since participate to World Bank field missions";Terjemahaan bebas:"Saya sangat terkesan oleh kecanggihan pabrik yang ditunjukkan kepadasaya..., yang mana peralatan tersebut dibeli
Putus : 16-10-2014 — Upload : 03-11-2014
Putusan PT DENPASAR Nomor 99/Pdt/2014/PT.DPS
Tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 —
149120
  • T3: Putusan Sela dari SIAC tanggal 23 Desember2013 dalam sengketa arbitrase Nomor ARB236/13/JY antaraPembanding semula Penggugat selaku Termohon I denganTerbanding semula Tergugat selaku Pemohon dalam bahasa57Inggris yang meminta Pembanding semula Penggugat selakuTermohon I untuk be restrained from pursuing the civilproceedings which have been commenced in the DenpasarDistrict Court (Ref: 94/WPA/Gugatan/XI/2013) on 7November 2013 and shall take all steps to suspend the same,pending the further order
Register : 04-08-2010 — Putus : 24-05-2011 — Upload : 08-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 515/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 24 Mei 2011 — H. HUTOMO MANDALA PUTRA, M e l a w a n : P.T. INDO MULTI MEDIA, TAUFIK DARUSMAN, SARI WIDIATI, PT. GARUDA INDONESIA ( PERSERO), PUJOBROTO, PRASETYO BUDI,
178134
  • If all goes according to plan, within the next ten years the area will be home to17 topname hotels, the largest beach club ever built in Bali, and an 18 hole golfcourses, which will play host to the Indonesia Open this coming February.Hal. 3 dari 183 halaman Putusan No. 515/Pdt.G/2010/PN.JKT.Sel.These hot properties are one main selling point of the Pecatu Indah Resort, as well asits stunning ocean views convincing reasons why the area is being called the NewKuta Beach.In line with the development
    If all goes according to plan, within the next ten years the area will be home to17 topname hotels, the largest beach club ever built in Bali, and an 18 hole golfcourses, which will play host to the Indonesia Open this coming February.These hot properties are one main selling point of the Pecatu Indah Resort, as well asits stunning ocean views convincing reasons why the area is being called the NewKuta Beach.In line with the development of this integrated tourism zone, the Pecatu Indah Resortis already
Register : 08-01-2020 — Putus : 10-02-2020 — Upload : 14-04-2020
Putusan PT SAMARINDA Nomor 2/PDT/2020/PT SMR
Tanggal 10 Februari 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : RAHMAT KUSTIWA
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Cq.PT.BANK MANDIRI Persero Tbk Cabang Bontang
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Cq.Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang
13671
  • Dan Essential error is that which isofsuch a nature as to prevent the existence of any real, consent, and thereforeany realagreement (1947: 357) ;Maka berdasarkan apa yang telah diuraikan di ataskiranya layak jika MajelisHakim Pengadilan Tinggi Samarinda mengabulkan gugatan daridebitur/Penggugat sekarang pembanding seluruhnya karena terdapat unsurpenyalahgunaan keadaan, yang menyebabkan debitur/Penggugat sekarangpembanding memberikan kesepakatan dalam keadaan tidak bebas,Pembanding semula Penggugat
Register : 11-03-2020 — Putus : 08-06-2020 — Upload : 14-06-2020
Putusan PN Cikarang Nomor 2/Pid.Pra/2020/PN Ckr
Tanggal 8 Juni 2020 — Pemohon:
Drs. H. TOTO IRIANTO
Termohon:
1.Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Cq Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Bekasi
2.Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Cq Mentri Keuangan Republik Indonesia
12583
  • tersebut adalah sesuai dengantujuan umum dibentuknya UndangUndang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 tahun 1981Halaman 15 dari 72Putusan Nomor 2/Pid.Pra/2020/PN Ckrtentang Hukum Acara Pidana (selanjutnya disebut KUHAP), yaitu untuk menciptakansuatu proses penegakan hukum yang didasarkan pada kerangka due process of law.Due process of law pada dasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai rule of law,akan tetapi merupakan unsur yang essensial dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan yangintinya adalah bahwa ia merupakan ...a law which
Register : 07-10-2009 — Putus : 03-11-2010 — Upload : 22-06-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 389/PDT.G/2009/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 3 Nopember 2010 — HARJANI PREM RAMCHAND >< MERRILL LYNCH INTERNATIONAL BANK LIMITED Singapore Branch (Merchant Bank),
317161
  • We are not aware, however , who the parties being reviewed are and which PTTI share transactions are beinginvestigated by Bapepam. We are also aware that the IDX has completedits review of the Share Transactions and has found evidence of potentialmarket manipulation/insider trading activity involving the ShareTransactions.
Register : 26-09-2019 — Putus : 01-11-2019 — Upload : 01-11-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 600/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 1 Nopember 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat II : Tuan ATMODJO SANTOSO
Pembanding/Penggugat III : Tuan ANDRE ADRIAN,
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. INDOLOK BAKTI UTAMA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PRESIDEN dan CEO GUNNEBO HOLDING APS
Terbanding/Tergugat III : Tuan LIONARD MAMAHIT
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : CHUBB SAFES INDONESIA
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat I : DEPARTEMEN KEUANGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II : DEUTSCHE BANK AG
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat I : SHIRLEY TAMTOMO
158128
  • Untuk lebihjelasnya kami kutip isi ketentuan Pasal 4.6 dan Pasal 23 Perjanjian Distribusisebagai berikut:Pasal 4.6 Perjanjian Distribusi:DISTRIBUTOR hereby undertakes and agrees with Gunnebo that it will atall times during the term of this Agreement (including any period of noticegiven pursuant to clause 2 thereof) observe and perform the terms andconditions set out in this Agreement and in particular that DISTRIBUTOR:4.6 Not to mislead as to capacity in which actingShall not hold itself out as part
    Untuklebih jelasnya kami kutip isi ketentuan Pasal 4.6 dan Pasal 23 PerjanjianDistribusi sebagai berikut:Pasal 4.6 Perjanjian Distribusi:DISTRIBUTOR hereby undertakes and agrees with Gunnebo that itwill at all times during the term of this Agreement (including anyperiod of notice given pursuant to clause 2 thereof) observe andperform the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement and inparticular that DISTRIBUTOR:4.6 Not to mislead as to capacity in which actingShall not hold itself out as part
    Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutipisi ketentuan MSA sebagai berikut:"INDOLOK shall pay CHUBB SAFES an annual fee (the Fee) ofnot less than US$300,000 (Three Hundred Thousand United StatesDollars) per year or pro rata for part of the year.In addition, INDOLOK shall pay annual to CHUBB SAFES a fee (theAdditional Fee) which shall be not less than 10.0% (ten percent)of the annual turnover of INDOLOK or pro rata of such fee for part ofthe year...Yang terjemahan resmi dan tersumpahnya adalah sebagai berikut
Upload : 14-10-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2446 K/PDT/2009
MARUBENI CORPORATION; PT. SWET INDOLAMPUNG
579588 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 2446 K/Pdt/2009Brown & Wood (on behalf of PT Garuda Pancaarta) toPT Holdiko Perkasa and Badan PenyehatanPerbankan Nasional) identified and depicted in Exhibit8 of the Supplemental Agreement, dated 12December 2001, which land is currently controlled byPT Indolampung Buana Makmur and PT IndolampungCahaya Makmur."
    The Arbitration shall takeplace in Singapore in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of theSingapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC Rules) for thetime being in force which rules are deemed to be incorporated byreference to this clause, in which case the language of thearbitration shall be in English, or in Jakarta, in the Purchaser's solediscretion, before 3 (three) arbitrators in accordance with the Rules(the Rules) of BANI (Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia).Terjemahan:Setiap perselisinan
    which land is currently controlled by PT IndolampungBuana Makmur and PT Indolampung Cahaya Makmur.Terjemahan:Untuk maksud surat yang dilampirkan, istilan Tanahmemiliki arti hakhak untuk menggunakan tanah (dan halterkait lainnya yang disebutkan sebelumnya dalam suratmenyurat Sidley Austin Brown & Wood (atas nama PTGaruda Pancaarta) kepada PT Holdiko Perkasa dan BadanHal. 597 dari 1653 hal.
    If such dispute cannot be resolved amicably by the partiesthen such dispute shall be settled exclusively and finally by arbitration.The Arbitration shall take place in Singapore in accordance with theArbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre(SIAC Rules) for the time being in force which rules are deemed to beincorporated by reference to this clause, in which case the language ofthe arbitration shall be in English, or in Jakarta, in the Purchaser's solediscretion, before
Putus : 21-12-2011 — Upload : 19-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 585/B/PK/PJK/2011
Tanggal 21 Desember 2011 — BUT EXXON MOBIL OIL INDONESIA INC vs. DIRJEN PAJAK
5936 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Benedum tetap memiliki kepentingan ekonomis atasKontrak Bagi Hasil blok B dengan cara memiliki hak secara kontraktual untukmenerima bagian atas hasil yang didapat dari produksi di masa yang akan datang;Bahwa perjanjian pengalihan 1968 secara tegas menyatakan bahwa Penjual tetapmemiliki suatu kepentingan Pasal V.B.1 dari Perjanjian Pengalihan 1968 berbunyisebagai berikut :Buyer shall pay to seller within sixty days following the end of each calendarquarter from the proceeds of sale of crude oil which