Ditemukan 2114 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 21-07-2017 — Putus : 15-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1517 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 15 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
8147 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixed placeof business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, in general,prepatory or auxilary Activities;Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory orauxilaiary character and those which have not.
    &pajak di Negara lain itu, tetapi hanya mengenai bagian laba yangdianggap berasal dari pendirian tetap tersebut;OECD MODEL 2008:Pasal 5 ayat (1):For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2):List of PE positive definition:Place of Management;Branch;Office;Factory;Workshop;an es PN PSMine, oil or gas well, quarry or any other place of extraction ofnatural
Register : 26-10-2020 — Putus : 11-01-2021 — Upload : 21-01-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 605/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 11 Januari 2021 — Pembanding/Penggugat : Tuan MUHAMMAD AMIR INGRATUBUN
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Bapak Takehiko Nakao
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Bank Pembangunan Asia atau The Asian Development Bank ADB dan semua komponennya
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat : Keuangan Republik Indonesia
137101
  • The Tribunal shall hear and pass judgment upon any applicationby which an individual member of the staff of the Bank allegesnonobservance of the contract of employment or terms ofappointment of such staff member.
    The Tribunal notes that thisaction constituted serious misconduct as contemplated by AO2.04 (Disciplinary Measures and Procedures) and breachedAO 2.02, para. 4.11, which precludes Applicant from pursuingemploymentrelated grievances in a national legal system.Moreover, the Tribunal strongly disapproves of such actionwhen an Applicant has an application pending before theTribunal.55) The Tribunal also notes that when the Applicant wrote tothe ADB on 5 June 2017 accusing the members of the ReviewPanel
    The Bank shall enjoy immunity from every form of legalprocess, except in cases arising out of or in connection withthe exercise of its powers to borrow money, to guaranteeobligations, or to buy and sell or underwrite the sale ofsecurities, in which cases actions may be brought against theBank in a court of competent jurisdiction in the territory of acountry in which the Bank has its principal or a branch office,or has appointed an agent for the purpose of acceptingservice or notice of process, or
    The Bank shall enjoy immunity from every form of legalprocess, except in cases arising out of or in connectionwith the exercise of its powers to borrow money, toguarantee obligations, or to buy and sell or underwrite thesale of securities, in which cases actions may be broughtagainst the Bank in a court of competent jurisdiction in theterritory of a country in which the Bank has its principal ora branch office, or has appointed an agent for the purposeof accepting service or notice of process, or
Putus : 16-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 503/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 16 Juni 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2211 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 503/B/PK/PJK/201611.12.13.14.memenuhi syarat pembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling,dipaku, disekrup, ditusuk atau dengan cara semacam itu.Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : TheHeading covers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivetsor similar devices;(6) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which areproduced in one piece usually attached to the base or platformby
    riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers ofwhich, being produced in one piece or assembled other than bystitching, are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to thesole by plugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced in one piece (for example,bathing slippers)Bahwa dengan Explanatory
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 533/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2816 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • injectionHalaman 28 dari 32 halaman Putusan Nomor 533 B/PK/PJK/201611moulding, karena untuk masuk pos 64.02 harus memenuhi syaratpembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusukatau dengan cara semacam itu..Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XII 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : The Headingcovers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivets orsimilar devices;(6) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    are producedin one piece usually attached to the base or platform by riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers of which,being produced in one piece or assembled other than by stitching,are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the sole byplugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Putus : 16-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 502/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 16 Juni 2016 — CV. Pujima Goarna vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2311 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memenuhi syarat kedua karena pembuatannya dengan carainjection moulding, karena untuk masuk pos 64.02 harus memenuhisyarat pembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup,ditusuk atau dengan cara semacam itu.Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : The Headingcovers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivets orsimilar devices;(6b) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    are producedin one piece usually attached to the base or platform by riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers of which,being produced in one piece or assembled other than by stitching,are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the soleby plugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Putus : 21-07-2010 — Upload : 19-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 401 K/Pdt.Sus/2010
Tanggal 21 Juli 2010 — HERMAN W.G.M. NOOIJEN vs DR H. CAHYOKO BAHAR SARJITO
16985 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This may occur in document or by theembodiment of the design in articles which are available to thepublic through exhibition which or sale. Legislation may provide forcertain excepted disclosuere which do not destroy novelty for thepurposes of registering a design" ;Terjemahannya :"(a) pengungkapan.Dasar dari kebaruan/novelty, apakah itu secara universal atau nasionaladalah apakah suatu desain telah di publikasi atau di ungkapkan sebelumtanggal penerimaan permohonan.
    jika pengiriman Desain Industriadalah setelah tanggal penerimaan akan dianggap sebagaipublikasi sebelumnya dan membatalkan pendaftaran DesainIndustri tersebut dengan alasan bahwa Desain Industri tidak barupada saat pengajuan permohonan;Bahwa dalam buku berjudul Russel Clarke on Industrial Design"oleh Martin Howe, Sixth Edition Sweet & Maxwell, terdapatkutipan yang relevan sebagai berikut :Disclosure to a single person is enough for publication;As has already been noted, the most common ways in which
    However, thereis no restrichbn on the manner ini which the design comes to bepublished, and the disclosure could even be purely oral. In general, therewill be publication if the design is disclosed to any individual member ofthe public who is not under any obligation to secrecy. Disclosure tomerely one such person will be sufficient to constitute publication.
Putus : 12-04-2016 — Upload : 27-03-2017
Putusan PN SERANG Nomor 40/PDT.G/2015/PN SRG
Tanggal 12 April 2016 — PERDATA - PT. IGAS UTAMA LAWAN - PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, DKK
22988
  • BOTH PARTIES (catatan dari TERGUGAT Il: BOTH PARTIESadalah PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT dengan TERGUGATll) shall in the first instance attempt to resolve any and alldisputes, controversies, and conflicts which may arisingbetween them in connection with this Agreement amicably bymutual and good faith consultation, conciliation, andcooperation2.
    akandiselesaikan dengan itikad baik melalui musyawarah untuk mufakat.Hanya apabila tidak dapat dicapai mufakat dalam waktu 60 hari, parapihak mengajukan permohonan penyelesaian perselisihan melalui BAN(any and all disputes, controversies, and conflicts which may arisingbetween them in connection with this Agreement).
    BOTH PARTIES (catatan dari TERGUGAT I: BOTHPARTIES adalah PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT denganTERGUGAT Il) shall in the first instance attempt to resolveany and all disputes, controversies, and conflicts which mayarising between them in connection with this Agreementamicably by mutual and good faith consultation, conciliation,and cooperation.2.
    Bahwa Indonesia telah sepakat dan oleh karenanya telah meratifisirKonvensi New York 1958, Pasal Il ayat 1, New York Convention onthe Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958)menyatakan:Each Contracting State shall recognize an agreement inwriting under which the parties undertake to submit toarbitration all or any differences which have arisen or whichmay arise between them in respect of a defined legalrelationship, whether contractual or not, concerning a subjectmatter capable
    Statements of case which aresuitable fro striking out on ground (a) include those which raise anunwinnable case where continuance of the proceedings is withoutany possible benefit to the respondent and would waste resourceson both sides (Harris v. Bolt Burden 2000 L.T.L., February 2,2000,CA).
Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1524 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. CHARABOT SA;
3518 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • harus dipenuhi agar Indonesia dalamhal ini dapat mengenakan pajak, Pemohon Banding dalam halini walau memiliki kehadiran yang permanen, namun tidakmenjalankan usaha di tempatnya tersebut;Bahwa pada Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf e dari P3B IndonesiaPerancis, dinyatakan bahwa "the term permanent establishmentshall not be deemed to include: ...the maintenance of a fixedplace of business solely for the purpose of advertising, for thesupply of information, for scientific research, or for similaractivities which
    Hal ini sudah dengan amatjelas diatur di P3B, dan Pemohon Banding sudah amat jelasmemenuhi ketentuan bahwa kantor di Indonesia bukanlah BUT.Kegiatan usaha dilakukan langsung oleh kantor pusat, danpenghasilan juga diterima langsung oleh kantor pusat;Bahwa Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis menyebutkanbahwa "for the purposes of this convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on";Bahwa hal ini
    aleorgene coon caacnd, baecieea cernfaatrad wend Kore hector airteniarenmy is rr ue ranigh ofawse: ware hospiFotis 62a Pek Sore far bores purserAE ie eee lp dionaura eaccrecm Bahwa dari Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf (e) dari perjanjian pajak bergandatersebut tegas dinyatakan:The term "permanent establishment" shall not be deemed to include:(e) The maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for thepurpose of advertising, for the suppiy of Information, forscientific research or for similar activities which
    Putusan Nomor 1524/B/PK/PJK/2017tetapi hanya sekedar kegiatan riset pemasaran produkprodukKantor Pusatnya;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis,dijelaskan sebagai berikut:"For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Untuk tujuan Persetujuan ini, istilah "tempat usaha tetap" berartisuatu tempat usaha tertentu dimana seluruh atau sebagian usahaperusahaan
    Bahwa hal tersebut juga ditegaskan dalamCommentary OECD Model Tax Convention atasParagraf 4 article 5 yang menyebutkan:This paragraph lists a number of businessactivities which are treated as exceptions to thegeneral definition laid down in paragraph 1 andwhich are not permanent establishments, even ifthe activity is carried on through a fixed place ofbusiness. The common feature of these activitiesis that they are, in general, preparatory or auxiliaryactivities;3.6.4.
Register : 21-10-2016 — Putus : 23-11-2017 — Upload : 28-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 23 Nopember 2017 — Arfan Syafril, Lawan NSB Niderelbe Schiffahrtsgesselschaft MbH & Co.KG,
494530
  • Pengadilan).Bahwa Permohonan PenetapanPengadilan telah dikabulkan oleh PNJaksel dengan dikeluarkannyaPenetapan No. 203 /Pdt.P /2016/PN.JKT.Sel. tertanggal 14September 2016 (Penetapan PNJaksel No. 203/2016).Bahwa Pihak KetigamengatasnamakandenganPerseroanregistered at the Registrar of SouthJakarta District Court under caseregister number746/Padt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel (theCompany), in this matter the ThirdParty and the Company arerepresented by Hendy RizkiHasibuan based on Specific Powerof Attorney which
    dapatditarik kembali untukmengesampingkan, menarik, danmembatalkan setiap dan semuatuduhan, tudingan, perselisihan,perbedaan dan/atau klaim, langsungatau tidak langsung yang dibuat,sehubungan dengan setiap perilaku,pernyataan, tindakan, dugaangangguan, pelanggaran ataukelalaian di antara Para Pihakberkaitan dengan Perseroan, PerkaraPerlawanan atau hubungan komersialdan hukum lainnya di antara ParaPihak.PASAL 2PELAKSANAAN PERDAMAIAN(1) Perseroan bersamasama denganPihak Pertama akan mengajukanopposition which
    is basicallyintended so that the PN Jakselwould cancel PN Jaksel StipulationNo. 203/2016, which is registered atRegistrar of the South JakartaDisitrict Court registered under casenumber 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel dated 21October 2016 (the OppositionCase) between the Company (asChallenger) and dengan First Party(as Challengee), and at the time thisAgreement is drawn up, theexamination of the Opposition Caseat PN Jaksel is still ongoing.5.
Register : 11-02-2019 — Putus : 25-04-2019 — Upload : 09-12-2019
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 73/PDT/2019/PT BDG
Tanggal 25 April 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : Hilton Hotel Bandung
Terbanding/Penggugat : Ivan Chrisna
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : Wedding Organizer Testimo
224171
  • Sebab segalaperselisihan yang timbul dari Conference & Event Agreement NoContract WRIGA 100318 tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017 (selanjutnyadisebut SURAT PERJANJIAN) di selesaikan melalui Arbitrase dan dalamhal ini yang berwenang adalah Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesiacabang Bandung sebagaimana Pasal 20 ayat 2 Surat Perjanjian yangmenyatakan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration
    of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui arbitrase sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi.Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Penggugat maupun Tergugat ,jikalaupun Pasal 20 ayat 2
    Bahwa Majelis Hakim PN Bandung secara nyata telah melampauikewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara aquo.Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 20 ayat (2) PerjanjianConference and Event Agreement No Contract: WRIGA 100318tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017, menyebutkan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotellocated under the Rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement wil
    the hotel islocated under the rules of arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotelis located.Bahwa apabila Pembanding/ semula Penggugat Rekonpensimengajukan Gugatan Wanprestasi yang merupakan Gugatanperselisihan yang timbul akibat dari pelaksanaan suatu perjanjian,maka seharusnya dilakukan secara terpisah dengan perkara ini dantidak diajukan bersamasama dengan Perkara ini
    the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui ARBITRASE sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi ;Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Pembanding
Putus : 13-01-2016 — Upload : 18-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 985/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 13 Januari 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2413 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memenuhi syarat kKedua karena pembuatannya dengancara injection moulding, karena untuk masuk Pos 64.02 harusmemenuhi syarat pembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling,dipaku, disekrup, ditusuk atau dengan cara semacam itu;Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition, Volume 3, dinyatakan: The Headingcovers, inter alia:(9g) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivetsor similar devices;(h) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    areproduced in one piece usually attached to the base or platformby riveting;(i) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter, the uppers ofwhich, being produced in one piece or assembledother than by stitching, are attached to the sole by stitching;(i) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(k) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the soleby plugs which lock into holes in the sole;(1) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 534/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2814 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • injectionmoulding, karena untuk masuk pos 64.02 harus memenuhi syaratpembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusukatau dengan cara semacam itu.Halaman 28 dari 32 halaman Putusan Nomor 534 B/PK/PJK/201611.Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XII 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : The Headingcovers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivets orsimilar devices;(ob) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    are producedin one piece usually attached to the base or platform by riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers of which,being produced in one piece or assembled other than by stitching,are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the sole byplugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Register : 21-07-2017 — Putus : 15-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1519 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 15 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
7564 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixed placeof business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, in general,prepatory or auxilary Activities;Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory orauxilaiary character and those which have not.
    Putusan Nomor 1519/B/PK/PJK/201 7Pasal 5 ayat (1):For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2):List of PE positive definition:Sor re W =Place of Management;Branch;Office;Factory;Workshop;Mine, oil or gas well, quarry or any other place of extraction ofnatural Resources;Pasal 5 ayat (4):Tempat Usaha yang dikecualikan sebagai BUT/PESuatu tempat usaha tidak
Putus : 03-02-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 942/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 3 Februari 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. PINDO DELI PULP AND PAPER MILLS
5928 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memutuspermohonan Banding atas keputusan/ketetapan yang diterbitkan olehPejabat yang berwenang sepanjang peraturan perundangundangan yangterkait yang mengatur sedemikian";Bahwa Pasal 11 Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda antaraPemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Kerajaan Belanda,menyatakan:Ayat (1), "Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident ofthe other State may be taxed in that other State";Ayat (2), "However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which
    bungalainnya sebesar Rp121.958.100,00, dapat Wajib Pajak sampaikan halhalsebagai berikut:Bahwa Terbanding dalam tahap pemeriksaan melakukan koreksi positifobjek PPh Pasal 26 atas bunga yang diperoleh CVI GVF (LUX) MasterS.A.R.L. sebesar Rp121.958.100,00 dengan tarif PPh Pasal 26 sebesar10% dari jumlah bruto bunga yang dibayarkan;Bahwa Pasal 11 ayat (2) Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda antaraIndonesia dan Luxembourg, menyatakan "However, such interest may alsobe taxed in the Contracting State in which
    Itmakes plain that the State of source is not obliged to give up taxingrights over interest income merely because that income wasimmediately received by a resident of a State with which the Stateof source had concluded a convention. The term "beneficial owner"is not used in a narrow technical sense, rather, it should beHalaman 29 dari 40 halaman.
    For thesereasons, the report from the Committee on Fiscal Affairs entitled"Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Conduit Companies"concludes that a conduit company cannot normally be regarded asthe beneficial owner if, though the formal owner, it has, as apractical matter, very narrow powers which render it, in relation tothe income concerned, a mere fiduciary or administrator acting onaccount of the interested parties;Berdasarkan ketentuan pada paragraph 10, maka dapat disampaikan:Negara tempat
    YahyaHarahap SH, Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan,Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yangdijatuhkan merupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembanganhukum (law development), sehingga pada hakekatnya
Putus : 29-10-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 651/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT LINCOLN ELECTRIC INDONESIA
5936 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Normally, distributions by a companywhich have the effect of reducing the membership rights, for instance,payments constituting a reimbursement of capital in any formwhatever, are not regarded as dividends;Paragraf 29;The benefits to which a holding in a company confer entitlement are,as a general rule, available solely to the shareholders themselves;Should, however, certain of such benefits be made available topersons who are not shareholders within the meaning of company law,they may constitute
    The reliefs provided in the Articleapply so long as the State of which the paying company is aresident taxes such benefits as dividends. It is immaterial whetherany such benefits are paid out of current profits made by thecompany or are derived, for example, from reserves, .e. profits ofprevious financial years.
    companywhich have the effect of reducing the membership rights, forinstance, payments constituting a reimbursement of capital in anyform whatever, are not regarded as dividends;(Suatu pembayaran disebut sebagai ddividen termasuk tidakhanya distribusi laba yang diputuskan dalam Rapat UmumPemegang Saham, tetapi juga manfaat/ keuntungan lain baikberupa uang atau bernilai uang, misalnya pembagian sahambonus, bonus,keuntungan dari likuidasi dan distribusi laba secaraterselubung);Paragraf 29;The benefits to which
Register : 12-07-2011 — Putus : 27-02-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-43581/PP/M.XVII/19/2013
Tanggal 27 Februari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12731
  • The classification of certain motor vehicles in this heading is determined by certainfeatures which indicate that the vehicles are designed for the transport of goods ratherthan for the transport of persons (heading 87.03)...";iii. Berdasarkan WCO Commodity Data Base, "motor vehicles for the transport of goods,with diesel or semidiesel engine and with a gross vehicle weight exceeding 20 tonnes"dimasukkan subpos 8704.23;iv.
    A typical dump truck is equipped with ahydraulicallyoperated openbox bed hinged at the rear, the front of which can be lifted up to allow thecontents to be deposited or) the ground behind the truck at the site of delivery.
    Berdasarkan EN to the HS Vol.5 fourth edition (2007) hal XVI87041 dijelaskan bahwa:The classification of certain motor vehicles in this heading is determined by certainfeatures which indicate that the vehicles are designed for the transport of goods ratherthan for the transport of persons (heading 87.03).d. Berdasarkan WCO Commodity data base, motor vehicles for the transport of goods, withdiesel or semidiesel engine and with a gross vehicle weight exceeding 20 tonnesdimasukkan subpos 8704.23e.
Register : 16-06-2011 — Putus : 19-08-2013 — Upload : 05-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put. 46602/PP/M.X/99/2013
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2013 — Penggugat dan Tergugat
18866
  • PeraturanPajak II Nomor: S794/PJ.033/2011 tanggal 13 Mei 2011 ditujukan kepada Director ofInternational Cooperation Division Competent Authority of Singapore;bahwa dalam Surat Direktur Peraturan Pajak II Nomor: S794/PJ.033/2011 tanggal 13 Mei2011 ditujukan kepada Director of International Cooperation Division Competent Authority ofSingapore, disebutkan bahwa:We are pleased to acknowledge the receipt of your fetter, ref: B/49/MAP/PFI Vol. 1 dated 13April 2011, regarding the request for MAP application which
    Surat dari Inland Revenue of Singapore Nomor: B/49/MAP/PFI Vol.1 tanggal 13 April2011;bahwa dalam Surat Direktur Peraturan Pajak II Nomor: S794/PJ.033/2011 tanggal 13 Mei2011 ditujukan kepada Director of International Cooperation Division Competent Authority ofSingapore, disebutkan bahwa:We are pleased to acknowledge the receipt of your fetter, ref: B/49/MAP/PFI Vol. 1 dated 13April 2011, regarding the request for MAP application which was lodged by PetraFoods Limited (PFL), a tax resident of Singapore
    The information disclosed in this letter is furnished under the Singapore Indonesia DTA, which limits its use and disclosure.bahwa Penggugat menyampaikan tambahan penjelasan dengan Surat Nomor: XXX 08/II/2012tanggal 9 Pebruari 2012 yang pada pokoknya mengemukakan:L.
Register : 02-11-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42591/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12331
  • In exceptional cases where the Certificate of Origin (Form E) has not beenissued by the time of shipment or no later than three (3) days from the date ofshipment, at the request of the exporter, the Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall beissued retroactively in accordance with the domestic laws, regulations andadministrative rules of the exporting Party within twelve (12) months from the date ofshipment, in which case it is necessary fo indicate ISSUED RETROACTIVELY?
Register : 04-08-2017 — Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1527 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
5133 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixedplace of business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, ingeneral, prepatory or auxilary activities.Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory or auxilaiarycharacter and those which have not.
    Jikaperusahaan menjalankan usahanya seperti yang dikatakansebelumnya, laba dari perusahaan itu bisa dikenakan pajak di Negaralain itu, tetapi hanya mengenai bagian laba yang dianggap berasaldari pendirian tetap tersebut.OECD MODEL 2008Pasal 5 ayat (1)For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2)List of PEpositive definition:Place of managementBranchOfficeFactoryWorkshopor
Putus : 01-01-1970 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 946/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 1 Januari 1970 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK, VS PT COCA COLA INDONESIA
3103124 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Where a resident of one of the Contracting States and anyother person are related and where such related personsmake arrangements or impose conditions betweenthemselves which are different from those which would bemade between independent persons, any income,deductions, credits, or allowances which would, but forthose arrangements or conditions, have been taken intoaccount in computing the income (or loss) of, or the taxpayable by, one of such persons, may be taken into accountin computing the amount
    Where a Contracting State includes in the profits of aresident of that State, and taxes accordingly, profits onwhich a resident of the other Contracting State has beencharged to tax in that other State, and the profits so includedare profits which would have accrued to the resident of thefirstmentioned State if the conditions made between the tworesidents had been those which would have been madebetween independent persons, then that other State shallmake an appropriate adjustment to the amount of
    Theissue is whether the marketer should be compensated asa service provider, .e. for providing promotional services,or whether there are any cases in which the marketershould share in any additional return attributable to themarketing intangibles.
    In that case, the distributorwould be entitled to compensation appropriate to itsagency activities alone and would not be entitled to sharein any return attributable to the marketing intangible.Where the distributor actually bears the cost of itsmarketing activities (i.e. there is no arrangement for theowner to reimburse the expenditures), the issue is theextent to which the distributor is able to share in thepotential benefits from those activities.