Ditemukan 2117 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 26-07-2012 — Putus : 14-05-2013 — Upload : 08-11-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.44903/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 14 Mei 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
10021
  • kriteria dimaksud butir 6.1 di atas, harusdiklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.Bahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut: 64.01Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luardan bagian atas dari karet atau dariplastik, bagian atasnya tidak dipasangpada sol dan tidak dirakit dengan caradijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup,ditusuk atau proses semacam itu. 6401.10.00.00Waterproof footwear with outer solesand uppers of rubber or of plastics, theuppers of which
Putus : 02-11-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1376/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 2 Nopember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT BANK MEGA Tbk.
4923 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Insuch a case the provisions of Article 8 (Business Profits) orArticle 15 (Independent Personal Services) shall apply;Where any amount designated as interest paid to any relatedperson exceeds an amount which would have been paid to anunrelated person, the provisions of this Article shall apply only toso much of the interest as would have been paid to an unrelatedperson.
    In such a case the excess payment may be taxed byeach Contracting State according to its own law, including theprovisions of this Convention where applicable;The term "interest" as used in this Convention means incomefrom bonds, debentures, Government securities, notes, or otherevidences of indebtedness, whether or not secured by amortgage or other securities and whether or not carrying a rightto participate in profits, and debtclaims of every kind, as well asall other income which, under the taxation
    Putusan Nomor 1376/B/PK/PJK/2016State in which the income has its source, is assimilated toincome from money lent;2.5.
Putus : 09-09-2002 — Upload : 10-01-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 22 K/N/2002
Tanggal 9 September 2002 — Marubeni Corporation (Marubeni)
155108 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Notaris di Jakarta tanggal 13 Oktober 1995 yangditandatangani oleh Termohon pailit 1 untuk keuntungan Pemohon pailit (vide Bukti P2),yang didalam halaman pertamanya secara tegastegas dan tidak dapat disangkal lagimenyatakan:"In consideration of your issuing the Guarantee, we hereby unconditionally andirrevocably undertake to indemnify and reimburse you for whatever amounts you maybe called upon to pay to the Banks under the Guarantee together with any fees,commissions, charges or other expenses which
    ongkosongkos dan pengeluaranpengeluaran (termasuk biayabiaya pengacara yang wajar) yang dikeluarkan oleh Pemohonpailit dalam hubungan dengan pelaksanaan atau upaya untuk melaksanakan Contract forUndertaking Guarantee (Indemnity), sebagaimana secara tegastegas dan tidak dapatdisangkal lagi dinyatakan dalam kata selanjutnya Pasal 2 tersebut diatas yaitu sebagaiberikut:"The Guarantor hereby further undertake to indemnify and hold Marubeni harmlessfrom and against any loss, cost, damage, claim or expense which
    to Marubeni and it is successorsas a principal debtor and not merely as a surety the prompt payment to Marubeni upon itsdemand, all amounts payable to Marubeni by Polystar under the Indemnity, when the samebecome due (whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise), together whit allattorney's fees. cost and expenses of collection incurred by Marubeni.The Guarantor hereby further undertake to indemnify and hold Marubeni harmless from andagainst any loss, cost, damage, claim or expense which
Register : 10-10-2014 — Putus : 21-01-2015 — Upload : 22-04-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 897 B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 21 Januari 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. HOPPECKE INDONESIA;
229 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In Exceptionalcases where the Certificate of Origin (Form E) has not been issued by thetime of Shipment or no later than three (3) days from the date ofShipment, at the request of the exporter, the Certificate of Origin (FormE) shall he issued retroactively in accordance with the domestic laws,regulations and administrative rules of the exporting Party within twelve(12) month from the date of shipment, in which case it is necessary toindicate "ISSUED RETROACTIVELY" in Box 13.
Putus : 06-05-2010 — Upload : 21-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 76 /B/PK/PJK/2007
Tanggal 6 Mei 2010 — BUT ABN AMRO BANK N.V. (ABN) VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
2313 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa dalam Pasal 7 ayat (3) Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Bergandaantara Indonesia Belanda, biayabiaya aktual yang dikeluarkan untukkepentingan Bentuk Usaha Tetap di Indonesia dapat dikurangkan dalammenentukan laba suatu Bentuk Usaha Tetap;Bahwa di dalam Pasal 7 ayat (3) Perjanjian Penghindaran PajakBerganda antara Indonesia Belanda disebutkan bahwa:In the determination the profits of a permanent establishment, there shallbe allowed as deductions expenses which are incurred for the purposesof the
Register : 19-12-2012 — Putus : 16-01-2014 — Upload : 15-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT-49914/PP/M.VII/19/2014
Tanggal 16 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11631
  • DA007with characteristic odorof this productC20H3202, % > 40.0 41.9 CAHB/DA008Arochidonic Acidmg KOH/g < 1.0 0.1 CAHB/DAO10Acid Valuemeq/kg < 2.0 0.03 CAHB/DAO10Peroxide Valuebahwa sesuai MSDS, antara lain menyatakan :Name : Arachidonic Acid Oil (> 40%)Product Number : AOG40Appearance : Golden yellow oilPhysical constants : SolidBoiling Point : Not availableMolecular Formula) : C20H3202Formula Weight : 304,46Density : Not availableFlash Point : >112 degCOther Information : It is the vegetable fungi oil which
Putus : 24-06-2015 — Upload : 02-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 175/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 24 Juni 2015 — PT. INDO TAMBANGRAYA MEGAH Tbk vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
139238 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • is subjected to the same taxationtreatment as income from shares by the laws of the State of which the companymaking the distribution is a resident.Ketentuan ini secara substansial mengatur bahwa definisi dividen adalah:35.e Penghasilan atas kepemilikan saham dari laba (income from sharesparticipating in profits); dane Penghasilan dari kepemilikan perusahaan yang dikenai pajak yang sama denganpengenaan pajak atas penghasilan dari saham berdasarkan hukum negara tempatperusahaan yang membayar dividen
    terdaftar sebagai subjek pajak (incomefrom other corporate rights which is subjected to the same taxation treatment asincome from shares by the laws of the State of which the company making thedistribution is a resident).Oleh karena itu, definisi dividen menurut Pasal 10 (3) Tax Treaty mencakup setiapjenis penghasilan yang perlakuan Pajak Penghasilannya sama dengan penghasilankarena kepemilikan saham dari laba (dividen).
    Berikut Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali kutipkan ketentuan dalam TaxTreaty, sehubungan dengan pembayaran dividen, yang terkait dengan istilahBeneficial Owner (Article 10 (1) dan (2) Tax Treaty).Article 10 (1) Tax TreatyDividends paid by a company which is a resident of a Contracting State to aresident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State.Article 10 (1) Tax TreatyHowever, such dividends may also be taxed in the Contracting State of which thecompany paying the dividends is a resident
    and according to the laws of that State,but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the dividends, the tax so charged shallnot exceed:i 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if the company paying thedividends engages in an industrial undertaking ;ii 20 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in other cases.This paragraph shall not affect the taxation of the company in respect of the profitsout of which the dividends are paid.Bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan ini, dividen yang dibayar
    Itmakes plain that the State of source is not obliged to give up taxing right overdividend income merely because that income was immediately received by resident ofa State with which the State of source had conclude a convention. ....Berdasarkan Commentary tersebut, secara jelas diterangkan bahwa istilah beneficialowner sematamata untuk mengklarifikasi arti kata dibayar ... kepada Wajib Pajak(resident).
Putus : 29-12-2009 — Upload : 26-10-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 365/B/PK/PJK/2009
Tanggal 29 Desember 2009 —
114 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ., milk enriched in vitamins ormineral salts), small quantities of stabilisingagents which serve to maintain the naturalconsistency of the product during transport inliquid state (disodium phosphate, trisodiumcitrate and calcium choride, for instance) aswell as very small quantities of anti oxidants orvitamins not normaly found in the product.Certain of these products may also contain smallquantities chemicals (e.g., sodium bicarbonate)necessary for their processing, product in theform of powder
    Thusheading 19.01 includes, for example(1) Preparations in powder or liquid from used asinfant food or for dietetic purposes andconsisting of milk to which secondaryingredients (e.g., cereal, groats, yeast) havebeen added;(2) Milk preparations obtained by replacing one ormore constituents of milk (e.g., butyric fats)by another substances";Berdasarkan Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized Systemtersebut di atas, sangat jelas ditentukan bahwasuatu produk dapat diklasifikasikan HS1901.10.29.00, apabila
Putus : 11-12-2019 — Upload : 20-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4134/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 11 Desember 2019 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
4919 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • sesuai identifikasi adalah alaskaki tahan air dengan sol luar (outer sole) dan bagian atas (upper)dari plastik, dibuat dengan cara pencetakan melalui penyuntikan(Injection Moulding), tidak dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusuk,atau proses semacam itu;Bahwa BTKI 2012 alas kaki dengan outer sole dan upper terbuat daribahan karet atau plastik, diklasifikasikan pada Pos Tarif 64.01 dan64.02 dengan uraian:64.01 Waterproof Footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber orof plastics, the uppers of which
    Putusan Nomor 4134/B/PK/Pjk/2019This document has been created with TX Text Control Trial Version 20.0 You can use this trial version for further 0 days.64.01 Waterproof footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber orofplastics, the uppers of which are neither fixed to the sole norassembledby stitching, riveting, nailing, screwing, plugging or similarprocesses;6401.10 Footwear incorporating a protective metal toecap Of rubber:6401.10.11 00 Riding boots solely of rubber6401.10.19 00 Other6401.10.20
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 27-11-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 275 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA;
7580 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which itarises and according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficialowner of the interest is a resident of the other State, the tax so chargedshall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.3.
    For these reasons, the report from the Committee onFiscal Affairs entitled "Double Taxation Conventions and the Use ofConduit Companies" concludes that a conduit company cannotnormally be regarded as the beneficial owner if; though the formalowner, it has, as a practical matter, very narrow powers which renderit, in relation to the income concerned, a mere fiduciary oradministrator acting on account of the interested parties."15..2 Dalam buku berjudul "Beneficial Ownership of Royalties in BilateralTax
    Bahwa dalam /Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yang dijatuhkanmerupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembangan hukum (lawdevelopment), sehingga pada hakekatnya, perkara yang diputusberdasarkan yurisprudensi berkaitan erat dengan perubahan sosial (sosialchange) dan kondisi ekonomi (economic condition
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-50154/PP/M.VIII/16/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11320
  • EU VAT Directive tentang Place of Supply of Goods dinyatakanbahwa where goods are use dispatched or transported, the place of supply shall be deemed to be theplace where the goods are located at the time when the supply takes place;bahwa berdasarkan article empat puluh tiga EU VAT Directive tentang General Rules Place of Supply ofService dinyatakan bahwa the place of supply of service shall be deemed to be the place where thesupplier has established his business or has a fixed establishment from which
Putus : 08-05-2019 — Upload : 31-07-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1432 B/PK/PJK/2019
Tanggal 8 Mei 2019 — BUT PP OIL & GAS (INDONESIA JABUNG) LIMITED vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
6773 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Keempat, in casuBranch Profit Tax, memiliki keterkaitan hubungan hukum (innerlijkesamenhang) antara Kontrak Bagi Hasil (Production Sharing Contract)dengan P3B Indonesia Inggris sebagaimana yang dimuat dalam Article10.7 yang menyatakan bahwa : Notwithstanding any other provisions ofthis Agreement, where a company which is a resident of one of the twoStates has a permanent establishment in the other State, the profits ofthe permanent establishment may be subjected to an additional tax inthat other
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-50155/PP/M.VIII/16/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11318
  • EU VAT Directive tentang Place of Supply of Goods dinyatakanbahwa where goods are use dispatched or transported, the place of supply shall be deemed to be the placewhere the goods are located at the time when the supply takes place;bahwa berdasarkan article empat puluh tiga EU VAT Directive tentang General Rules Place of Supply ofService dinyatakan bahwa the place of supply of service shall be deemed to be the place where thesupplier has established his business or has a fixed establishment from which
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 29-01-2014 — Upload : 17-04-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-50164/PP/M.VIII/16/2014
Tanggal 29 Januari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11222
  • EU VAT Directive tentang Place of Supply ofGoods dinyatakan bahwa where goods are use dispatched or transported, the place ofsupply shall be deemed to be the place where the goods are located at the time when thesupply takes place;bahwa berdasarkan article empat puluh tiga EU VAT Directive tentang General RulesPlace of Supply of Service dinyatakan bahwa the place of supply of service shall bedeemed to be the place where the supplier has established his business or has a fixedestablishment from which
Register : 13-11-2012 — Putus : 11-02-2014 — Upload : 28-08-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.50390/PP/M.VIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 11 Februari 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11417
  • atau tidak,asalkan Alas Kaki dimaksud memenuhi kriteria dimaksud butir 6.1 di atas, harusdiklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.64.06401.10.00.006401.92.00.006401.99.00.00MenimbangMemperhatikanMengingatBahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut :Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luar dan Waterproof footwear with outer solebagian atas dari karet atau dari and uppers of rubber or of plastics,Plastik, bagian atasnya tidak dipasang uppers of which
Putus : 30-08-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1542 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 30 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. KALTIM METHANOL INDUSTRI
5331 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The same persons participate directly or indirectly in the management,control or capital of an enterprise of a Contracting State and anenterprise of the other Contracting Slate;and in either case conditions are made or imposed between the twoenterprises in their commercial or financial relations which differ fromthose which would be made between independent enterprises, thenany profits which would, but for those conditions, have accrued to oneof the enterprises, but, by reason of those conditions
Putus : 20-11-2017 — Upload : 12-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2103 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 20 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ANEKA INTIPERSADA
3318 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 2103/B/PK/PJK/2017bahwa terkait dengan Keadilan Horizontal (Horizontal Equity)pada halaman 221 disebutkan:A variant of principle of individual equity which holds thatsimilarly situated taxpayers should receive similar taxtreatment",(varian dari prinsip keadilan individual yaitu bahwa wajib pajakyang berada pada situasi yang sama harus menerima perlakuanpajak yang sama);bahwa sedang untuk Keadilan Vertikal (Vertical Equity) padahalaman 472 menyebutkan:A variant of individual equity,
    which holds that differentlysituated taxpayers should be treated differently;(varian dari keadilan individual yaitu bahwa wajib pajak yangberada pada situasi yang berbeda harus diperlakukan berbeda);bahwa Musgrave dalam Horizontal Equity, Once More(Richard A.
    Thisprinciple of equality, or horizontal equity, is fundamental to theabilitytopay approach, which requires equal taxation of peoplewith equal ability and unequal taxation of people with unequalability.
    Without a scheme ofvertical equity, the requirement of horizontal equity at bestbecomes a safeguard against capricious discriminationa safeguard which might be provided equally well bya requirement that taxes be distributed at random. To meanmore than this, the principle of horizonthal equity must be seenagainst the backdrop of an explicit view of vertical equity;(Persyaratan adanya keadilan horizontal dan vertikal adalah duasisi yang berbeda dari koin yang sama.
    are imposed initially on theindividual or household that is meant to bear the burden;Indirect taxes are taxes which are imposed at some other pointin the system but are meant to be shifted to whomever issupposed to be the final bearer of the burden;Personal taxes, such as individual income tax, are thus direct;and most inrem taxes, such as sales and excise taxes, areindirect;(...pajak langsung adalah pajak yang dikenakan kepadaindividu atau rumah tangga yang memang harus menanggungbeban tersebut
Register : 21-06-2013 — Putus : 30-04-2014 — Upload : 27-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-52213/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 30 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12325
  • Preferential tariff treatment shall be applied to goods satisfying the requirements of thisChapter and which are consigned directly between the territories of the exporting MemberState and the importing Member State.2.
    Preferential tariff treatment shall be applied to goods satisfying therequirements of thirs Chapter and which are consigned directly betweenthe territories of the exporting Member State and the importing MemberState.2.
    Preferential tariff treatment shall be applied to goods satisfying the requirements ofthirs Chapter and which are consigned directly between the territories of theexporting Member State and the importing Member State.2.
    Hal ini merupakan bukti bahwa barang impor saat transit diSingapura tidak pernah diolah atau dikonsumsi dan hanya dilakukan kegiatan bongkarmuat,Berdasarkan penjelasan Shimano Malaysia dalam Lampiran 3: Flow of Process Startfrom the Goods Ready at Shimano Malaysia until the Goods Ready Ship to Surabaya,Indonesia at Singapore Port:e Port (Tanjong Pelepas) near to Shimano Malaysia the vessel is limited,e Sinagpore Port is international free port which having very active vessel schedule toworldwide
Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1531 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP.
6734 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixed placeof business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, in general,prepatory or auxilary activities.Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf4 disebutkan :24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory orauxilaiary character and those which have not.
Register : 05-07-2013 — Putus : 08-04-2014 — Upload : 30-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.51811/PP/M.VIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 8 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12629
  • itu;Pos 64.01 tidak mempertimbangkan apakah bagian upper berlubang atau tidak,asalkan Alas Kaki dimaksud memenuhi kriteria dimaksud butir 7.1 di atas, harusdiklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.bahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut :Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luar dan Waterproof footwear with outer solesbagian atas dari karet atau dari plastik, and uppers of rubber or of plastics, thebagian atasnya tidak dipasang pada uppers of which