Ditemukan 816 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 29-08-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT CNOOC SES Ltd vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
7752 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumptionthat CONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by any taxtreaty to which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.In the event that, subsequently, any portion of CONTRACTOR 's participatinginterest
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSCversi terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1829 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
270209 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and Is not sheltered by any tax treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1831 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
247100 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:Halaman 7 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1831/B/PK/PJK/2017BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionHalaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1831/B/PK/PJK/2017under Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Putus : 18-02-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1003 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 18 Februari 2016 — ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC. (SINGAPORE BRANCH) VS PT PERTAMINA (Persero)
231248 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Untuk lebih jelasnya kamikutip isi dari General Average Bond Termohon Kasasi sebagai berikut:In consideration of the delivery to us or to our order, on payment of thefreight due, of the goods noted above, we agree to pay the properproportion of any salvage and/or general average and/or generalaverage and//or special charges which may here after be ascertained tobe due from the goods or the shippers or owners thereof under anadjustment prepared in accordance with the provisions of the contract ofaffreightment
Register : 27-05-2016 — Putus : 05-01-2017 — Upload : 04-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 301/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Pst.
Tanggal 5 Januari 2017 — PT. ORIGA MULIA FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTICS (PT. ORIGA MULIA F.R.P) X PT. SURABAYA STEEL INVESTAMA
11540
  • If the process of deliberation and consensus does not occur, then allparties involved agree and agree to resolve it and choosing legalcommon law in Central Jakarta District Court ;3. The law governing this agreement is the law of the Republic ofIndonesia ; 7= == 22 nnn nnn nn an nnn nnn en nee nn ee nnnHal 2 dari 50 Hal. Put. No : 301/Pat.G/2016/PN.Jkt. Pst.Terjemahan bebasnya adalah sebagai berikut :1.
Register : 04-10-2022 — Putus : 01-12-2022 — Upload : 06-12-2022
Putusan PN BOJONEGORO Nomor 161/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Bjn
Tanggal 1 Desember 2022 — Penuntut Umum:
NURAINI PRIHATIN, S.H.,M.Hum
Terdakwa:
KHOIRUR ROZIKIN Bin MARJUKI
4916
  • 1 (satu) buah sarung guling warna hijau;

    Dikembalikan kepada yang berhak yaitu Tri Sumartini Rahayu;

    10. 1 (satu) buah kaos oblong warna biru;

    11. 1 (satu) buah celana pendek warna abu-abu;

    12. 1 (satu) unit Hp merk Redmi warna abu-abu;

    13. 1 (satu) unit sepeda motor Honda Vario warna hitam Nopol S 4344 GD tanpa STNK beserta kunci kontak;

    14. 1 (satu) buah CD warna ungu merk Agree;

    Dikembalikan kepada Terdakwa Khoirur Rozikin Bin

Register : 26-10-2023 — Putus : 21-12-2023 — Upload : 21-12-2023
Putusan PN YOGYAKARTA Nomor 388/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Yyk
Tanggal 21 Desember 2023 — Penuntut Umum:
FITRI LUWIYAN, SH
Terdakwa:
MICHAEL GIOVANNI PAMUNGKAS AJIE Bin GUNTUR PRADIPTA PUTRA
5811
  • MUHAMMAD RAFA NURIL MUSYAFA;
1 (satu) lembar fotocopy kartu keluarga NO. 3471130509001042;
9 (sembilan) lembar foto;
1 (satu) buah celana dalam merk AGREE ukuran M warna abu-abu;
Dikembalikan kepada saksi MUHAMMAD RAFA NURIL MUSYAFA.
Register : 21-01-2020 — Putus : 04-03-2020 — Upload : 06-07-2020
Putusan PN MOJOKERTO Nomor 8/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mjk
Tanggal 4 Maret 2020 —
460
  • .- 4 (empat) poket shabu kemasan plastik klip kecil yang dimasukkan di dalam bungkus rokok Gudang Garam Surya;- 1 (satu) poket shabu kemasan plastik klip sedang yang dimasukkan di dalam bungkus rokok Sampoerna Mild;- 1 (satu) poket shabu kemasan plastik klip besar yang dimasukkan di dalam bungkus rokok Sampoerna Mild;2. 2 (dua) butir Narkotika jenis inex atau ecstasy warna biru dan hijau (yang warna biru terdapat tulisan lego);3. 1 (satu) potong celana dalam warna abu-abu merk AGREE SPORT;4
Register : 14-12-2021 — Putus : 04-01-2022 — Upload : 04-01-2022
Putusan PA Ngamprah Nomor 746/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Nph
Tanggal 4 Januari 2022 — Pemohon melawan Termohon
2129
  • DanAllah Maha Luas pemberiannya lagi Maha Mengetahul;Hadits Rasulullah SAW (Kitab Subulus Salam juz II halaman 110):D gling ale al hee atl Jgwy WE aie atl 2) agree Cy atl Le Oepel feel ob cared Geld!
Register : 17-01-2014 — Putus : 11-08-2014 — Upload : 09-10-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 19/PDT/ARB/2014/PN.JKT.PST
Tanggal 11 Agustus 2014 — PT Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line Tbk >< HANDYTANKERS K/S OF COPENHAGEN
492216
  • . , 222 nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnnProvided that, mere the amount in dispute does not exceed the sumof US$ 50,000 (or such other sum as the parties may agree) anydispute shall be resolved in accordance wih the small claims procedureof the London Mantime Arbitrators Association. Terjemahan Resmi:Klausul Arbitrase L. M.A.
Register : 26-04-2017 — Putus : 08-06-2017 — Upload : 04-07-2019
Putusan PA BATURAJA Nomor 42/Pdt.P/2017/PA.Bta
Tanggal 8 Juni 2017 — Pemohon melawan Termohon
265
  • perkawinan antara calonmempelai wanita dan calon mempelai lakilaki dapat membahayakan kedua calonmempelai berupa perzinahan dan dapat pula membahayakan orang lain yaitu aibbagi kedua orang tua calon mempelai dan masyarakat setempatHalaman 19 dari 23 halam Penetapan No. 0042/Padt.P/2017/PA.BtaDisclaimer Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia berusaha untuk selalu mencantumkan informasi paling kini dan akurat sebagai bentuk komitmen Mahkamah Agung untuk p publik, p idan fungsi pDalam ree agree
Register : 16-06-2011 — Putus : 19-08-2013 — Upload : 05-12-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put. 46602/PP/M.X/99/2013
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2013 — Penggugat dan Tergugat
19370
  • We therefore agree that our twoCompetent Authorities should discuss and seek to resolve the application presented byour respective taxpayers. To facilitate the process forward, we would appreciate it ifyou could explain to us the Indonesian Tax Authority's considerations and basis for theadjustments made to income on XXX for the fiscal year 20006.5.
Register : 29-11-2018 — Putus : 17-12-2018 — Upload : 08-01-2020
Putusan PN Pulau Punjung Nomor 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Plj
Tanggal 17 Desember 2018 — Terdakwa
15076
  • berwarna abu abu;
  • 1(satu) helai bra berwarna pink bermotif bunga;
  • 1 (satu) helai celana dalam berwarna pink;
  • 1 (satu) helai daster berwarna putih bermotif bunga;
  • 1 (satu) helai handuk bergaris kotak berwarna hijau bertuliskan clasic;

Dikembalikan kepada Anak Korban Laras Shinta PanggilanLaras;

  • 1 (satu) helai celana dalam berwarna hijau bertulisan agree
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
10665 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa ketentuan yang melarang penerapan tarif P3B baru mulai dicantumkandalam PSC terbaru tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut:"BP MIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under ArticleHalaman 7 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/201726 (4) of the Indonesian Income tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treatyto which the Government
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):Halaman 43 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in SubSections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Register : 06-10-2021 — Putus : 21-10-2021 — Upload : 23-12-2021
Putusan PN TEMANGGUNG Nomor 5/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Tmg
Tanggal 21 Oktober 2021 — Terdakwa
1220
  • bukti berupa :

    - 1 (satu) setel celana dan baju warna pink kombinasi putih motif bola bergambar hello kitty,

    - 1 (satu) potong celana dalam warna kuning,

    - baju kotak berwarna hitam putih merek SAIL atas kantong kiri bertuliskan XXA-541L dan atas kantong kanan SCOTER,

    - celana pendek warna hitam bergambar PUMA, dan

    - celana dalam warna biru merek AGREE

Register : 13-11-2017 — Putus : 20-02-2018 — Upload : 03-07-2019
Putusan PA BATURAJA Nomor 1351/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Bta
Tanggal 20 Februari 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
205
  • Dalam hal Anda agree inakurasi inforpasi y8 Se situs pias Gung seharusnya ada, namun belum tersedia, maka harap segera hubungi Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI melalui:emai: KEDQANICElaan aManagu QO.10 rep : 021384 3348 (ext. 318)Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesiaputusan.mahkamahagung.go.id4. Membayar leasing; 5. Keperluan anakanak sekolah;6.
Register : 06-02-2023 — Putus : 30-03-2023 — Upload : 30-03-2023
Putusan PN Mentok Nomor 24/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mtk
Tanggal 30 Maret 2023 — Penuntut Umum:
NAUFAL AMMANULLAH, S.H.
Terdakwa:
OKTAVIANUS Als APRIS Als MAMI Bin DOMINUS
4511
  • ujung tangan;
  • 1 (satu) helai celana dalam warna abu tua merek Levis;
  • 1 (satu) unit handphone merek Vivo Y20 warna dawn white dengan Imei1: 864577054236338 dan Imei2: 864577054236320;

Dikembalikan pada Anak Saksi Dias Tegar Armando alias Diaz melalui orang tuanya;

  • 1 ( satu) helai celana panjang warna merah;
  • 1 (satu) helai baju lengan pendek warna hitam corak gambar;
  • 1 (satu) helai celana dalam warna hijau army merek Agree
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1828 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
299277 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ketentuan dalam PSC baru tersebutberbunyi sebagai berikut:"BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentages appearing inthe Section VI of this CONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction under Article26 (4) of the Indonesian Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by any Tax Treatyto which the Government of the Republic Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal 15.4.1 PSC versi terbarutersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deductionunder Article 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is notsheltered by any Tax Treaty to which the Government of the Republicof Indonesia has become a party.
    Ketentuan dalam Pasal15.4.1 PSC tersebut berbunyi sebagai berikut (Bukti PK9):BPMIGAS and CONTRACTOR agree that all of the percentagesappearing in Subsections 6.2.3 and 6.3.2 of Section VI of thisCONTRACT have been determined on the assumption thatCONTRACTOR is subject to final tax on profits after tax deduction underArticle 26 (4) of the Indonesia Income Tax Law and is not sheltered by anyTax Treaty to which the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hasbecome a party.
Register : 28-12-2016 — Putus : 24-03-2017 — Upload : 22-05-2017
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 768/PDT/2016/PT.DKI
Tanggal 24 Maret 2017 — K21 SINGAPORE PTE LTD >< PT.ASURANSI RECAPITAL CS
280196
  • PENGGUGAT dan TURUTTERGUGAT, merupakan Perjanjian Pokok dan yang kemudian dijaminoleh TERGUGAT dengan menerbitkan 2 (dua) jaminan berupa surety bond.Pertama, Advance Payment Bond pada tanggal 9 Juni 2012 dengan nomorHDO/BAPB/02/2012/00041 (Advance Payment Bond); Kedua,Performance Bond pada tanggal 28 Februari 2013 dengan nomorHDO/BPB/99/2013/00119, nilai Bond USD 3,600,000.00 (PerformanceBond).Bahwa pada Pasal 3 huruf c.i Perjanjian PENGGUGAT TURUTTERGUGAT, berbunyi sebagai berikut :The Parties agree
    pasal1831 dan pasal 1832 KUHPerdata dalam jaminan pelaksanaan ( PerformanceBond ) dan jaminan uang muka ( Advance Payment Bond ).Menimbang, bahwa dari buktibukti P27 Jo P28 tentang PerformanceBond ( Jaminan Pelaksanaan ) tanggal, 28 Febuari 2013 paragraf 5 berbunyi : With refrence to article 1982 point (1) of the Indonesian CivilCode,SuretyHere by confirm that the SURETY religiush is privilege as shipubtated inarticle 1931 of the Indonesia civil code for that purpose the principal andthe SURETY here by agree
Putus : 13-04-2009 — Upload : 02-10-2017
Putusan PN PUTUSSIBAU Nomor 05/Pid.B/2009/PN.Ptsb
Tanggal 13 April 2009 — SUKARYONO Bin S. SUSANTO (AIm.)
7636
  • Mayat memakai celan dalam dari kaos berwarna hijau tuadengan merek agree;3) Kaku mayat dan lebam mayat belum ada;4) Mayat adalah seorang lakilaki, bangsa Indonesia, berumur kurang lebih tigapuluh lima tahun, kulit berwarna sawo matang, gizi baik, panjang tubuh seratus 4enam putuh sembilan centimeter, berat tubuh kurang febih tujuh putuh timakilogram dan zakar disunat;5) Terdapat tato pada dada sebelah kiri atas bergambar jangkar dan bungabunga,pada lengan atas sebelah kanan terdapat tato bergambar