Ditemukan 542 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Register : 21-09-2011 — Putus : 05-06-2012 — Upload : 24-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 507/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel. Tanggal 5 Juni 2012 —
989 — 426
989 — 426
This confirmation will be valid until the respective tender procedure has beencompletely performed and would have to be migrated into aformal SupplyAgreement subject to compliance with Siemens Business Partner Check Procedure..Teriemahan:Konfirmasi ini akan berlaku sampai dengan prosedur tender dimaksud telahdilakukan secara tuntas dan akan dituangkan secara formal di dalam PerjanjianPengadaan dengan bergantung pada pemenuhan terhadap ProsedurPemeriksaan Rekanan Bisnis Siemens..."
Putus : 09-11-2011 — Upload : 22-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 844 K/Pid.Sus/2010 Tanggal 9 Nopember 2011 — BASRI alias BAH ;SYUKRI ;
27 — 18 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
27 — 18 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Keterpaduan sistem peradilanpidana dimaknai sebagai "...the collective institutions through which in accusedoffender passes until the accusations have been dispossed of or the assessedHal. 15 dari 35 hal. Put. No. 844 K/Pid.Sus/2010punishment concluded..". Sistem peradilan pidana terpadu bukanlah suatusistem yang bekerja dalam satu unit kerja atau bagian yang menyatu secaraharfiah melainkan adanya kombinasi yang serasi antar sub sistem untukmencapai satu tujuan.
Register : 04-02-2019 — Putus : 02-04-2019 — Upload : 18-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 79/PDT/2019/PT DKI Tanggal 2 April 2019 — Identitas Pihak Tidak Dipublikasi
256 — 192
256 — 192
arbitrators fees, experts fees, and all other costs, fees and expenses of any kind arising from this arbitration, amounting to USD98,306.44 and SGD 101,341.49;Order that the Respondent pay the Claimant interest over allamounts due and payable to the Claimant pursuant to this FinalAward as stated in this Dispositive in the form of monthly compound interest on the total award amounts that may become outstanding from time to time, commencing the first business day following the date of this Award until
Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 30-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 404 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2015 Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — Mr.LEIGH MURRAY YAXLEY VS PRESIDENT AND GENERAL MANAGER TATELY
159 — 120 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
159 — 120 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
(Company Nomor 87301)Registered Address: Kaya (Jombi) Mesning 36, Curacao"24th April 2014 To all Staff Re: Actin President and General Manager of TatelyNV and Accociated Companies in Indonesia.This is to confirm that Nina Marliana has taken the role of Acting President andGeneral Manager of Tately N.V. and Associated Companies in Indonesia witheffect from 1*tMarch 2014 until further notice.Yours faithfully, For and on behalf of TATELY N.V., by its Managing DirectorSGG Management (Coracao) N.V.signed
Register : 10-02-2011 — Putus : 15-03-2012 — Upload : 30-04-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel. Tanggal 15 Maret 2012 — PT. PUKUAFU INDAH (PT. PI),
M E L A W A N
1. NEWMONT INDONESIA LIMITED (NIL) (DENVER),
2. NUSA TENGGARA MINING CORPORATION (NTMC) (Tokyo),
154 — 105
154 — 105
Company, or any partthereof, to a third party provided that no such assignment shall be madeorhave any effect until all necessary Government approval thereto hasbeen obtained.Terjemahan:Dengan memperhatikan ketentuan Klausul 8, Newmont dapatMengalihkan seluruh Kepentingannya dan kepemilikan Sahamnya pada Perusahaan P.T., atau bagian daripadanya, kepada pihak ketiga dengan ketentuan bahwa pengalihan tersebut tidak boleh dilakukan atau belummulai berlaku efektif hingga segala persetujuan yang diperlukan
Company to a third party Indonesiannational but further provided that no such assignment shall be made orhave any effect until all necessary Government approval thereto has beenobtained.Terjemahan:Dengan tunduk pada ketentuan Klausul 8, dan pada Newmont dalamkewenangannya sematamemberipersetujuannya, Indahdapatmengalihkan seluruh Kepentingannya dan kepemilikan Sahamnya padaPerusahaan P.T. kepadapihakketiga yang berkewarganegaraanIndonesia tetapi dengan ketentuan bahwa pengalihan tersebut tidakboleh
Register : 21-02-2016 — Putus : 06-03-2013 — Upload : 26-07-2016
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 13/PID/TPK/2014/PT.DKI Tanggal 6 Maret 2013 — SIMON GUNAWAN TANJAYA
239 — 158
239 — 158
satu) bundel fotocopy Executive Summary LaporanPerkembangan Pasar Minyak Bulan April 2013 ;1 (satu) lembar kertas yang bertuliskan Deputi PengendalianKomersial Divisi Komersialisasi Minyak dan Kondensat... 511 (sebelas) lembar bahan paparan Kunjungan Kerja SKK Migas2013 tanggal 22 Maret 2013 oleh WIDHYAWANPRAWIRAATMADJA Deputi Pengendalian Komersial ;1 (satu) buah buku Laporan SKK Migas Kepada Presiden RILaporan Kuartal 2013 berikut 1 (satu) lembar kertas yangdiantaranya bertuliskan Bidding Plan Until
satu) bundel fotocopy Executive Summary LaporanPerkembangan Pasar Minyak Bulan April 2013 ;1 (satu) lembar kertas yang bertuliskan Deputi PengendalianKomersial Divisi Komersialisasi Minyak dan Kondensat... ;11 (sebelas) lembar bahan paparan Kunjungan Kerja SKK Migas2013 tanggal 22 Maret 2013 oleh WIDHYAWANPRAWIRAATMADJA Deputi Pengendalian Komersial ;1 (satu) buah buku Laporan SKK Migas Kepada Presiden RILaporan Kuartal 2013 berikut 1 (satu) lembar kertas yangdiantaranya bertuliskan Bidding Plan Until
Register : 16-09-2014 — Putus : 09-04-2015 — Upload : 08-07-2015
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 658/Pdt.G/2014/PN.DPS Tanggal 9 April 2015 — ADE CHAIRANI NURSYAFITRI MELAWAN PT. BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY
88 — 44
88 — 44
Dpsd) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity.2 Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until the arbitrationtribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, except in the event ofexpiration, termination or failure by any of the other
Putus : 07-03-2017 — Upload : 20-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3370 K/Pdt/2016 Tanggal 7 Maret 2017 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI vs. Perseroan Terbatas (PT) Bali Resort & Leisure (PT Bali Resort & Leisure Company),
141 — 107 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
141 — 107 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity andother related expenses shall be borne by the losing Party unlessotherwise determined by the arbitrating entity;Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until the arbitrationtribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, except in the event ofHalaman 11 dari 38 hal. Put.
Register : 05-12-2017 — Putus : 15-03-2018 — Upload : 05-04-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 760/PDT/2017/PT.DKI Tanggal 15 Maret 2018 — PT.MULTI SELERA INDONESIA >< ANTON SUSANTO
182 — 72
182 — 72
Tergugat Dalam Rekonpensi telah melakukanwanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Sewa aquo.17.Bahwa menurut butir 22.0 dalam Perjanjian Sewa aquo tentangPenghentian Awal, dikutib sbb:22.0 Early Termination : There is no Provision for early Termination,and therefore, in the event that the Lessee terminated this agreementor vacates the Demised Premises prior the expire that of the Lease Halaman 42 Putusan Nomor 760/PDT/2017/PT.DKIperiod then the Lessee is obligated to setile the Base Rent andService Charge until
Register : 24-08-2015 — Putus : 21-01-2016 — Upload : 25-10-2016
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 597/Pdt.G/2015/PN Dps Tanggal 21 Januari 2016 —
133 — 76
133 — 76
The fees and expensesof the arbitrating entity and other related expenses shalfbe borne by the losing Party unless otherwsedetermined by the arbitrating entity.Hali4dari 49halaman. putusan sela Nomor 5971Pdt.G120J 51PN Dps.14.3Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until thearbitration tribunal issues its decision, each Party shall, exceptin the event of expiration, termination or failure by any of theother Parties to obey or comply with a specific order or decisionof the arbitration
Putus : 30-09-2013 — Upload : 28-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 167 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2013 Tanggal 30 September 2013 — PT. YAYASAN SEKOLAH INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA VS ANDREW IVAN WARD
86 — 79 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
86 — 79 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
yang selanjutnya kami kutip sebagai berikut:Given all the circumstances above ve are offering you the opportunityto resign your post (effective at the end of Term 2, 2012).Yang terjemahan bebasnya sebagai berikut:perdasarkan seluruh keadaan yang telah disebutkan di atas, kamimenawarkan anda untuk mengundurkan diri dari posisi anda (mulaiberlaku pada akhir Term 2, 2012);Bahwa pada paragraf ke10 (sepuluh) surat yang sama, selanjutnyakami kutip sebagai berikut:We are prepare to continue your FTEA until
Register : 01-12-2020 — Putus : 03-11-2021 — Upload : 08-11-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1006/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL Tanggal 3 Nopember 2021 — Penggugat:
Wasco Engineering International Limited
Tergugat:
PT KPM Oil & Gas
320 — 228
Wasco Engineering International Limited
Tergugat:
PT KPM Oil & Gas
320 — 228
WASCO shall not be obliged toexecute the tasks in clause 3 (b) below until WASCO hasreceived the said USD 600,000 (United States Dollars SixHundred Thousand).Terjemahan resmi dan tersumpah sebagai berikut:(a) Perwakilan yang sah dari Para Pihak akan bertemu diIndonesia untuk menandatangani Perjanjian ini. Tanggal EfektifPerjanjian ini adalah tanggal pada saat Penanjian iniHalaman 5 dari 49 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 1006/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Selditandatangani.
Register : 21-11-2016 — Putus : 06-02-2018 — Upload : 23-02-2018
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 819/Pdt.G/2016/PN JKT.SEL Tanggal 6 Februari 2018 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
422 — 386
422 — 386
Hal ini secara jelas diaturdalam Pasal 4 Confidentiality Agreement yang dikutip oleh Tergugat dan IIsebagaimana berikut :This agreement will take effect on the date when it is signed by both partiesand will remain in force until the discussion and/or negotiations end withacontract including the present confidentiality provisions.
Register : 02-01-2012 — Putus : 21-11-2013 — Upload : 11-11-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 515/Pdt.G/2012/PN.JKT.BAR. Tanggal 21 Nopember 2013 —
345 — 412
345 — 412
theimplementation of Article 56 section ( 1 ) of The IndonesianArbitration Law, the parties expressly agree that the arbitrationtribunal shall be solely bound by strict rules of law in making theirdecision and may not render an award based on aquitableprinciple ( ex aequo et bono ) and/or other considerations ; ( ii )the parties agree to waive Article 48 section ( 1 ) and 73 paragraph( b ) of the Indonesian Arbitration Law, so that the mandate of thearbitration tribunal duly appointed shall remain in effect until
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 26-10-2016 — Upload : 05-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1083 B/PK/PJK/2016 Tanggal 26 Oktober 2016 — PT. LAFARGE CEMENT INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
63 — 39 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
63 — 39 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
pada saat terjadinya pengalihan saham tersebut,Penggugat seharusnya sudah menyerahkan SKD pada saat pelaporan.Bahwa pada kenyataannya memang SKD / COD Cementia Holding AGditerbitkan pada tanggal 22 November 2010 oleh Kantonales SteueramtZurich selaku otoritas yang berwenang di negara Swiss, namun demikiandi dalam SKD Cementia Holding AG (lampiran ke11) tersebut secarajelas dinyatakan bahwa:It is hereby certified that the claimant has been a resident of Switzerlandduring the period from 1.1.2007 until
Putus : 08-02-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3715 K/Pdt/2016 Tanggal 8 Februari 2017 — ADE CHAERANI NUR SAFITRI VS PERSEROAN TERBATAS (PT) BALI RESORT & LEISURE (PT
BALI RESORT & LEISURE COMPANY
147 — 71 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
147 — 71 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
and no Party shall dispute or question the decision ofthe arbitration tribunal before any judicial authority in the Republicof Indonesia or elsewhere;(e) each Party shall bear the expenses, such as traveling, meals andlodging expenses, which It incurs in connection with the arbitration.The fees and expenses of the arbitrating entity and other relatedexpenses shall be borne by the losing Party unless otherwisedetermined by the arbitrating entity;Pending the submission to arbitration and thereafter until
Register : 17-07-2018 — Putus : 27-09-2018 — Upload : 15-11-2018
Putusan DILMIL I 02 MEDAN Nomor 91-K/PM.I-02/AL/VII/2018 Tanggal 27 September 2018 — Oditur:
Saifuddin, SH
Terdakwa:
1.Triono
2.Soleman
3.Sukamto
4.Rahmad
5.Doni Arfianto
6.Arief Jusrianto
7.Tukijo
8.Moch Safii
86 — 57
Saifuddin, SH
Terdakwa:
1.Triono
2.Soleman
3.Sukamto
4.Rahmad
5.Doni Arfianto
6.Arief Jusrianto
7.Tukijo
8.Moch Safii
86 — 57
Butet yang terletak di seberangpos penjagaan Yonif8 Marinir until bersembunyi.is Bahwa karena banyak anggota yang mengejar, sehinggaSaksi ikut mengejar Saksi5 sampai ke jalan raya dan setelah itukembali ke pos penjagaan.8. Bahwa setelah kembali dari mengejar Saksi5, Saksimelihat dan mendengar anggota Yonif8 Marinir berteriak danHal. 14 dari 55 hal.
Putus : 21-05-2013 — Upload : 28-03-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 891 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 Tanggal 21 Mei 2013 — PT DIRECT VISION VS ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, Dkk
550 — 408 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
550 — 408 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
No. 891 K/Pdt.Sus/2012(ii).take no further steps in the Indonesian proceedings save todiscontinue them as set out in (i) in so far as they concern C.6,C.7, C.8 and Mr Marshall;(iii).be prohibited from bringing any further proceedings against C.6,C.7, C.8 and Mr Marshall in so far as they relate to the joint venturerelationship other than by way of arbitration pursuant to clause 17.4of the SSA;until further Order;Terjemahan Resmi (vide Bukti P5B) (kutipan, dengan penambahanketerangan dan penebalan
Putus : 18-05-2016 — Upload : 30-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 26 PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016 Tanggal 18 Mei 2016 — 1. ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, DKK VS 1. PT AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, DKK
1392 — 1834 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
1392 — 1834 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Nomor 26 PK/Pat.SusArbt/2016stake in the reference which has (until now) been very hard fought at everystage. The issues were complex and the documents voluminous. TheTribunal see no reason to reduce any award for costs simply on the basisthat the amounts claimed are excessive;19.In principle, the Claimants should have their costs as the obviouslysuccessful party.
Register : 21-08-2017 — Putus : 13-08-2018 — Upload : 27-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 433/Pdt.Bth/2017/PN Jkt.Pst Tanggal 13 Agustus 2018 — Penggugat:
PT. Catur Jaya
Tergugat:
Carlson Hotels Asia Pasific PTY Limited
281 — 110
PT. Catur Jaya
Tergugat:
Carlson Hotels Asia Pasific PTY Limited
281 — 110
costs, fees and expenses of any kind arising from this arbitration, amounting Hal 4 Putusan No.433/Pdt.Bth/2017/PN.Jkt.Pst. to USD 98,306.44 and SGD 101,341.49;9) Order that the Respondent pay the Claimant interest over all amounts due andpayable to the Claimant pursuant to this Final Award as stated in this Dispositive inthe form of monthly compound interest on the total award amounts that maybecome outstanding from time to time, commencing the first business day followingthe date of this Award until