Ditemukan 2113 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : watch white whini whim weich wacih whidi wich winch
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Persaingan Usaha
Putus : 07-03-2013 — Upload : 16-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3 K/Pdt.Sus/2013
Tanggal 7 Maret 2013 — KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA REPUBLIK INDONESIA vs 1. PT HUABEI PETROLEUM SERVICE, diwakili oleh Ir. Eddy Wirajaya, Direktur PT Huabei Petroleum Service, 2. SPE PETROLEUM Ltd.
295 — 232 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For drilling rig services: delivery date of the rig which is minimum 1(one) month, but as company's tender specification must be within 1 (one)month. Therefore, the delivery date of the rig did not meet company'srequirement as stated in tender specification;b. For mud logging services: PT. Saripari Pertiwi Abadi only provided thecatalogue for their equipment instead of the list of personnel and the listof equipment as stated in company's tender specification;c.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN
Register : 26-08-2016 — Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 23-03-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 385 K/TUN/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — BUPATI TANGERANG VS H. SAADULLOH SYROCH;
113 — 71 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Adapun dalam konteks sistem peradilan juga dikenaldengan sistem peradilan (judicial corruption) dan tidak mengembangkansikap yang dikenal dengan istilah judicial discretion yang menyatakan :"Enlightened by intelligence and learning, controlled by sound principles oflaw, of firm courage combined with the calmness of cool mind, free frompartiality, not swayed by sympathy nor warped by prejudice not move by anykind of influence save alone the overwhelming passion to do that which isjust;yang terjemahannya
Pengadilan PN TANJUNG KARANG Pidana Umum Penghinaan
Putus : 25-01-2016 — Upload : 04-08-2016
Putusan PN TANJUNG KARANG Nomor 01/PID.PRA/2016/PN.Tjk
Tanggal 25 Januari 2016 — -MINTARDI HALIM alias AMING
172 — 37
  • Due processof law pada dasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai rule of law, akan tetapi merupakan unsure yangessensial dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan yang intinya adalahbahwa ia merupakan ...a law which hears before it condemns, whichproceeds upon inquiry, and renders judgement only after trial... Padadasarnya yang menjadi titik sentral adalah perlindungan hakhakasasi Individu terhadap arbitrary action of the goverment.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Putus : 29-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 238 PK/Pdt/2014
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2014 — PT BERKAH KARYA BERSAMA, vs Ny. SITI HARDIYANTI RUKMANA,,dkk
3418 — 2953 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • TPI (Turut Tergugat I) yangmembahas masalah/agenda apapun dalam rangka pelaksanaanInvestment Agreement tertanggal 23 Agustus 2002 danSupplemental Agreement tertanggal 7 Februari 2008,sebagaimana dikutip sebagai berikut:...In the framework of the implementation of the InvestmentAgreement dated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented bythe supplemental agreement dated 7 February 2003 executed bythe parties thereto, including the Principal and the Attorney......f0 call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which
    Nomor 238 PK/Pdt/2014Investment Agreement tertanggal 23 Agustus 2002 danSupplemental Agreement tertanggal 7 Februari 2008,sebagaimana dikutip sebagai berikut:...In the framework of the implementation of the InvestmentAgreement dated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented bythe Supplemental Agreement dated 7 February 2003 executed bythe parties thereto, including the Principal and the Attorney......to call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which will discuss, interalia, the following matters:5.
    Surat Kuasa Khusus tersebutadalah surat kuasa khusus tertanggal 7 Februari 2003 dan 3 Juni 2003(Bukti T11.1 T11.4 , T19.3), yang di dalamnya menyebutkan secara jelasbahwa :OO tenes In the framework of the implementation of the Investment Agreementdated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented by the SupplementalAgreement dated 7 February 2003 executed by the parties thereto, includingthe Principal and the Attorney,5 26 eeemame to call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which will discuss, inter alia,the
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 07-12-2013 — Upload : 22-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 640/B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 7 Desember 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PERFEKTA NUSA
28 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The law andreglations of each country lay down the forms of invoice, the timelimit for its issue, charges in invoices, and the use ofcredit notes To preventa possible black markert developing in theuse of tax invoices (which are a claim on the government,tantamount to printing money and the classic way to evade VAT),requirement to give the name and address and reference of bothseller and buyer, as well as the other statutory detailsshould be strictly enforced";c.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pajak STP Bunga Penagihan
Putus : 22-01-2013 — Upload : 17-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 626/B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 22 Januari 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PERFEKTA NUSA
240 — 71 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The law andreglations of each country lay down the forms of invoice, the timelimitfor its issue, charges in invoices, and the use of credit notes.To prevent a possible black markert developing in the use of taxinvoices (which are a claim on the government, tantamount toprinting money and the classic way to evade VAT), requirementto give the name and address and reference of both seller andbuyer, as well as the other statutory details should be strictlyenforced. "Halaman 37 dari 40 halaman.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 23-03-2017 — Putus : 17-05-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 673 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 17 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. MITSU MIIKE MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED ;
46 — 29 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Dalam hal perusahaan induk dari Wajib Pajak BUT adalahpenduduk dari negara yang telah mempunyai PersetujuanPenghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B) dengan Indonesia, makabesarnya tarif untuk penerapan ketentuan sebagaimanadimaksud dalam Pasal 1 ayat (1) adalah sebagaimanaditentukan dalam P3B tersebut;Protocol antara Pemerintah Indonesia dan Jepang:Angka 5 (a):...on the earnings (other than those derived from the operationof ships or aircraft in international traffic) of a company being aresident of Japan which
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata
Register : 17-11-2017 — Putus : 07-08-2018 — Upload : 27-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 625/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 7 Agustus 2018 — Penggugat:
PT INTERNUX
Tergugat:
PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT,
320 — 118
  • Internux issue the SBLC (Standby Letter of Credit) to cover the coming4,8M USD overdue payment (forecast before Oct), which the valid periodtill end of 2017;3. Internux issue Lippo Insurance Corporate Guarantee to support total 15MUSD refinancing by the Mid of July, to support the refinancing facility fromSinosure;Option B:1. Huawei will support the temporary license till to the Oct, and commit to sellthe License (DRA/MSC/UGW/USN/UPCC/HSS BE) to Internux after refinancing success;2.
    perkara a quo,dikarenakan PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT telah memilih forumlembaga arbitrase yaitu Badan Arbitrase Nasional Republik Indonesia(selanjutnya disebut sebagai BANI), sebagai forum penyelesaiansengketa.Bahwa pemilihan BANI sebagai forum penyelesaian sengketa secarategas diatur:Article 15Dispute SettlementAny dispute arising hereunder or connected with this Contract,including a dispute as to the validity or existence of this Contract,Shall be resolved amicably within 30 (thirty) days, failing which
    optik, radio, atau sistem elektromagnetiklainnya.Sedangkan yang dimaksud dengan penyelenggaratelekomunikasiadalah badan usaha yang melakukan kegiatan usaha di bidangtelekomunikasi.Bahwa TERGUGAT merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidangmanufaktur dan pemasok peralatan dan layanan penunjangtelekomunikasi dan tidak bergerak di bidang telekomunikasi.Supplierisa company running business asmanufacturerandsupplier of equipment of service for Base Transceiver Station (BTS)and telecommunication netwok which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 08-12-2010 — Putus : 22-01-2013 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 624 B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 22 Januari 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. PERFEKTA NUSA;
46 — 24 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The law and reglations of each countrylay down the forms of invoice, the time limit for its issue, charges ininvoices, and the use of credit notes.To prevent a possible black marked developing in the use of tax invoices(which are a claim on the government, tantamount to printing money andthe classic way to evade VAT), requirement to give the name and addressand reference of both seller and buyer, as well as the other statutorydetails should be strictly enforced."Halaman 37 dari 40 halaman.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 23-02-2017 — Putus : 17-04-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 415 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 17 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. JASA PRIMA RAYA;
29 — 12 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • (3) huruf d) dan e) Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda(Tax Treaty Agreement) antara Indonesia dan Kanada mengatur:The term permanent establishment "shall not be deemed to include themaintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose ofpurchasing goods or merchandise, or for collecting information, for theenterprise) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for thepurpose of advertising, for the supply of information, for scientific research,or for similar activities which
Pengadilan PN BATAM Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 29-10-2015 — Putus : 09-06-2016 — Upload : 13-11-2019
Putusan PN BATAM Nomor 245/PDT.G/2015/PN Btm
Tanggal 9 Juni 2016 — PT. BUANA LISTYA TAMA, Tbk., PT. BUANA BENUA SHIPPING,
424 — 440
  • BUANA SUCCESS XI with yourtowing barge come passing with very slow speed when passing my vesselfrom my port side at 14.25 LT your vessel with towing barge was collided ourvessel on my bulbous area with estimate damage size length 1.5 mtr, wide1.5 mtr and dented 30 cm which caused seriously damage on frame number139 to 140 as per attached photo to our vessel on bulbous area of MT GasMaluku.Terjemahan bebasnya:Kapal kami MT Gas Maluku, pada pelayaran ke 17/14, dalam kondisikosong tanpa muatan (hanya
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Hak Uji Materiil
Register : 02-01-2020 — Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 20-03-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 6 P/HUM/2020
Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — Dr. Hj. NURHAJIZAH M., SH.,MH VS KETUA KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM RI (KPU RI);
389 — 801 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The rule of law sendiri dimaknai sebagaia legal system in which rules are clear, wellunderstood, andfairlyenforced sebuah sistem hukum yang jelas (kecil kKemungkinan untukdisalahgunakan), mudah dipahami, dan menjaga tegaknya keadilan.Kepastian hukum menjadi salah ciri the rule of law, yang di dalamnyamengandung asas legalitas, prediktibilitas, dan transparansi;2/.Bahwa kepastian hukum atau /egal certainty dalam tradisi klasik the ruleof law menurut pendapat dari Friedrrich von Hayek adalah salah
Pengadilan PN YOGYAKARTA Perdata
Register : 20-11-2017 — Putus : 29-08-2018 — Upload : 20-09-2019
Putusan PN YOGYAKARTA Nomor 173/Pdt.G/2017/PN Yyk
Tanggal 29 Agustus 2018 — Penggugat: Mr. LIN NAN KUE Tergugat: 1.PT. GRAHA KENCANA MEGAH 2.SUGENG NUGROHO 3.RUDY GUNAWAN
450 — 114
  • .173/Pdt.G/2017/PN Yykbagi Penggugat Rekonpensi/ Tergugat Konpensi, Karena menjadikanProyek Pembangunan Malioboro Heritage menjadi Terhambat, terlebihlagi Penggugat Rekonpensi/ Tergugat Konpensi tidak dapatmenjual/mengalinkan kepada pihak lain atas 60 Kondotel yang sudahdipesan oleh Tergugat Rekonpensi/PenggugatKonpensi ;Bahwa didalam Marketing Agreement tertanggal 30 Januari 2015, PartIll, 12 TERM di nyatakan :The Commencement date of theAppointment shall be the effective date ofThis Agreement which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pidana Khusus
Putus : 21-12-2011 — Upload : 13-11-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2074 K/PID.SUS/2011
Tanggal 21 Desember 2011 — Jaksa/ Penuntut Umum pada Kejaksaan Negeri Timika ; Ir. HARI EDI YOEWONO
37 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • UDHR );2 Pasal 15 (1) International Convention on Civil andPolitical Right (ICCPR) ;3 Pasal 22 ayat (1) dan Pasal 24 ayat (1) Statua Romatentang International Criminal Court ( I.C.R ) ;e Pasal 1 ayat (1) KUHP menentukan : Suatu perbuatan tidakdapat dipidana kecuali berdasarkan kekuatan ketentuan perUndangundangan pidana yang telah ada;4 Pasal 15 International Conventional on Civil andPolitical Right (ICCPR) ;e No one shall be held quilty of any criminal offence on account ofany act or omission which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Putus : 14-02-2017 — Upload : 21-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2 PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017
Tanggal 14 Februari 2017 — PT. KARYA BERSAMA TAKAROB VS PT. ADHI KARYA (PERSERO) Tbk
775 — 444 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Undang Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1968 yang menyebutkan:"Either party may request annulment of the award by an application inwriting addressed to the SecretaryGeneral on one more of the followingground:a)b)c)that the Tribunal was not properly constituted;that the Tribunal has manifestly exceeded its powers;that there was corruption on the part of a member of the Tribunal;d) that there has been a serious departure from afundamental rule of procedure; ore) that the award has failed to state the reason on which
Pengadilan PN Suka Makmue Pidana Umum
Register : 19-08-2021 — Putus : 09-11-2021 — Upload : 06-12-2021
Putusan PN Suka Makmue Nomor 63/Pid.B/2021/PN Skm
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2021 — Penuntut Umum:
HALAND PERDANA PUTRA, S.H.
Terdakwa:
EDI YANTO Bin MAK SYAH
1545 — 1775
  • E/2000/INF/2/Add.2 at 35 (2000)mengartikan keadilan restoratif sebagai any process in which the victim, theoffender and/or any other individuals or community members affected by a crimeactively participate together in the resolution of matters arising from the crime,often with the help of a fair and impartial third party.
Pengadilan PTUN BANDA ACEH TUN Lain lain termasuk Piutang
Register : 16-02-2016 — Putus : 20-07-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan PTUN BANDA ACEH Nomor 04/G/2016/PTUN-BNA
Tanggal 20 Juli 2016 — 1. USMAN, dan 2. TEUKU SYAFRIZAL lawan BUPATI ACEH BARAT DAYA,
127 — 61
  • No one shall be subject to coercion which would impairhis freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice;3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may besubject only to such limitations as are prescribed by lawand are necessary to protect public safety, order, health,or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms ofothers ; 4.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-01-2013 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 631/B/PK/PJK/2010
Tanggal 22 Januari 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PERFEKTA NUSA
27 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The law andregulations of each country lay down the forms of invoice, thetime limit for its issue, charges in invoices, and the use of creditnotes;To prevent a possible black market developing in the use of taxinvoices (which are a claim on the government, tantamount toprinting money and the classic way to evade VAT), requirementto give the name and address and reference of both seller andbuyer, as well as the other statutory details should be strictlyenforced";Michael Keen, JeanPaul Bodin and Victoria
Pengadilan PT SAMARINDA Perdata
Register : 16-03-2021 — Putus : 06-04-2021 — Upload : 06-04-2021
Putusan PT SAMARINDA Nomor 46/PDT/2021/PT SMR
Tanggal 6 April 2021 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. PARAS MEGAH UTAMA
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT. BANK MANDIRI Persero Tbk cq. PT. BANK MANDIRI Persero Tbk. Commercial Banking Balikpapan
337 — 164
  • yang akan diklaim oleh PT PHMselaku Beneficiary/Obligee;Bahwa atas surat tersebut, Tergugat mengirimkan surat NomorCM1.BLP/1344/2019 tanggal 27 November 2019 yang pada intinyamenyatakan bahwa Tergugat tidak dapat mengabulkan permohonanPenggugat untuk tidak mencairkan Performance Bond apabila PT PHMmengajukan klaim karena Performance Bond tersebut bersifatunconditional sebagaimana tertuang pada poin 5 Warkat Bank Garansi,yang berbunyi sebagai berikut:Upon receipt of such demand from the OBLIGEE which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 19-10-2017 — Upload : 21-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 136 PK/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2017
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2017 — YUDHI TANTO, VS GS YUASA CORPORATION, DK
371 — 160 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pasal 6 ayat (1) huruf (b) mengenaimerek terkenal dan pedoman WIPO untuk merek terkenal;Bahwa Pasal 6 dari Konvensi Paris menyatakan bahwa negaranegaraanggota harus menolak atau membatalkan pendaftaran merek yangmerupakan reproduksi atau imitasi dari suatu merek terkenal, denganmenyatakan bahwa:"The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation sopermits, or at the request of an interested party, to refuse or to cancel theregistration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademark which