Ditemukan 9788 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 02-06-2010 — Putus : 24-08-2010 — Upload : 10-08-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 218 PK/Pdt/2010
Tanggal 24 Agustus 2010 — PT. PERUSAHAAN PELAYARAN JALANIDI TRANS, DK VS PT. INDAH KIAT PULP & PAPER, Tbk,
12397 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The floor of cargo hold as of free obstruction andthe owners shall insured proper, clean and safeseparation/stowage of the cargo. The owner shall ensurethat vessel is seawortly, properly manned, equipped andsupply.
    The owner shall make the cargo holds and all otherspart of the vessel in which the cargo are carried, fit andsafe for the reception, carriage and preservation of thecargo without prejudice to the generally of the foregoing.The owner shall be responsible for any damage to orcontamination of the cargo due to the improper stowage ofthe cargo on the vessel;16) The vessel be equipped with suitable gears liftingcargo and other machinery as stated in the vesselsparticularly and able to load/discharge palletized
    paperand reel paper without casing damage to the cargo, in theevent of the vessel gear breakdown or in capacity anylifting of the shorecrane be on owner's account;17) Damage/Chocking/lashing if any, shall be on owner'saccount if the floor of the laid is duty, rusty or notsuitable for shipper's cargo owner shall provide lay woodcovering, which shall be on owner's account;20) The owner shall provide good and sufficient lighting atthe cargo colds to facilitate that good and proper stowageof the cargo
    No. 218PK/Pdt/2010discharge of the cargo at the port of discharge;21) During the operation of loading and discharging of thecargo, the master of the vessel shall supervised allchocking/lashing/securing/stowage of the cargo so as toavoid any damage to the cargo;26) The owner shall ensure that the road to be taken fromthe loading port to the discharge port shall be chosen bythe master on the basic of avoiding and/or minising anyrolling/pitching of the vessel during the voyage which maydamage the cargo
    ensure that the route to be takenfrom the loading port to the discharge port shall bechosen by the master on the basic of avoiding and/orminimizing any rolling/pitching of the vessel during thevoyage which may damage the cargo."
Register : 19-02-2014 — Putus : 14-10-2014 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.56156/PP/M.IIA/99/2014
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2014 — Penggugat dan Tergugat
29374
  • Nations And The Peoples Republic Of China,dalam melaksanakan kerjasama ACFTA dimaksud disepakati untuk menggunakanRule of Origin (ROO) Form E atau Surat Keterangan Asal Barang Form E, yangdiatur secara rinci dalam Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) ForThe Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area.bahwa berdasarkan Appendix 1: Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP)For The Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 7dinyatakan The Issuing Authorities shall
    notes of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), and signed by theauthorised signatory,The origin of the product is in conformity with the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,The other statements of the Certificate of Origin (Form E) correspond to supporting documentaryevidence submitted,Description, quantity and weight of products, marks and number of packages, number and kinds ofpackages, as specified, conform to the products to be exported,Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
    be allowed subject to thedomestic laws, regulations and administrative rules of the importing Party provided each item mustqualify separately in its own right.bahwa berdasarkan Annex 3: Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) For TheRules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 3 dinyatakanWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered as whollyproduced or obtained in a Party:Plant and plant products harvested, picked or gathered there,Live animals 2 born and
Register : 20-12-2011 — Putus : 28-12-2012 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 808 B/PK/PJK/2011
Tanggal 28 Desember 2012 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS INDONESIA;
6830 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor.808 B/PK/PJK/201114148 Bahwa Pasal 7 ayat (4), Pasal 12 ayat (3) dan ayat (4) Perjanjian PenghindaranPajak Berganda (P3B) atau Tax Treaty antara Pemerintah Indonesia dan Inggris,menyatakan:Pasal 7 ayat 4:"Insofar as it has been customary in a Contracting State, according to its law, todetermine the profits to be attributed to a permanent establishment on the basis ofan apportionment of the total profit of the enterprise to its various parts, nothing inparagraph 2 of this Article shall
    preclude that Contracting State from determiningthe profits to be taxed by such an apportionment as may be customary; the methodof apportionment adopted shall, however, be such that the result shall be inaccordance with the principles laid down in this Article"Pasal 12 ayat (3)"The term royalties as used in this Article comprisesa Payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right touse, any copyright of leterary, artistic or scientific work, includingcinematograph films
    , and films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, orany patent, knowhow, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula orprocess; andb payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right towtuse, any industrial, commercial or scientific equipmentPasal 12 ayat (4)"The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall not apply if thebeneficial owner of the royalties, being a resident of a Contracting State, carries onbusiness in the other Contracting State
    In such case, the provisions of Article 7 orArticle 14 of this Agreement, as the case may be, shall apply;"9 Bahwa Pasal 12 ayat (3) dan ayat (4) Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda(P3B) atau Tax Treaty antara Pemerintah Indonesia dan Australia, menyatakan:Pasal 12 ayat 3"The term "royalties" in this Article means payments, whether periodical or not,and however described or computed, to the extent to which they are made asconsideration for:15a the use of, or the right to use, any copyright, patent
    In that case, the provisions ofArticle 7 or 14, as the case may be, shall apply:10 Bahwa berdasarkan peraturan perundangundangan perpajakan yang berlaku danberdasarkan hasil pemeriksaan sengketa banding di Pengadilan Pajaksebagaimana yang telah dituangkan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Pajak Nomor :Put.24918/PP/M.XIII/16/2010 tanggal 27 Juli 2010 serta berdasarkan penelitianatas dokumendokumen milik Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula PemohonBanding) dan faktafakta yang telah dapat diketahui secara jelas
Putus : 14-06-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 942/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT SURYA TOTO INDONESIA, Tbk
5234 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • atauperaturan perundangundangan sebagaimana tersebut di atas.1.2Bahwa Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Pajak~ keliru) dalammempertimbangkan kesalahan tidak mencontreng kolom 13 ThirdCountry Invoicing pada Form E a quo termasuk dalam kategorikesalahan kecil yang dapat diabaikan.1.3 Ketentuan mengenai Third Country / Party Invoicing secara spesifikdimuat dalam Rule 23 Annex 04 Origin Certification Procedure(OCP) ACFTA yang disahkan dengan Perpres 37/2011 sebagaiberikut:The Customs Authority of the importing Party shall
    The third party invoice number should be indicated in Box10 of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), the exporter and consigneemust be located in the Parties and the copy of the third party invoiceshall be attached to the Certificate of Origin (Form E) whenpresenting to the Customs Authority of the importing Party.1.4Berdasarkan Rule 7 huruf (a) Annex 04 OCP ACFTA yangdisahkan dengan Perpres 37/2011 menyatakan sebagai berikut:Rule 7The Issuing Authorities shall, to the best of their competence andability
    Putusan Nomor 942/B/PK/PJK/2017THIRD PARTY INVOICING: In cases where invoices are issued bya third country, the Third Party Invoicing in Box 13 shall be ticked(V). The invoice number shall be indicated in Box 10.
    Putusan Nomor 942/B/PK/PJK/2017(e) Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (FormE) shall be allowed subject to the domestic laws, regulationsand administrative rules of the importing Party provided eachitem must quality separately in its own right.2.4 Berdasarkan Annex 06 OCP ACFTA Overleaf Note butir 4,menyatakan sebagai berikut:EACH ARTICLE MUST QUALIFY: It should be noted that all thegoods in a consignment must qualify separately in their own right.This is of particular relevance
    Name of manufacturer andany trade mark shall also be specified.2.6 Bahwa pada faktanya, sesuai hasil penelitian terhadap SKA Form Eyang memberikan tarif preferensi pada 3 (tiga) PIB nomor: 395475tgl. 28/09/2012, 422465 tgl. 17/10/2012, dan 465606 igl.19/09/2012 telah ditemukan ketidaksesuaian antara Form Edengan ketentuan OCP ACFTA, sebagai berikut: No.
Putus : 07-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1427/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 7 September 2017 — PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO), vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3826 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If at such tins Fhis Breves pat to be the casean iBeclal allocation procedures Tespecling Blank OperatingCosta vill ba adopted as may be acpreoriate,8.02 The charges provideda i EAGP In Section 6.01 shall be asneciFladSaparately :B ty for eaeh sales Conteack and acaject ta separateCash calls and dabit . notes by Plant Operater and Paid SyProducers in acesrdance with che Acounting Preceduce,Such charges and Payments, shall ba Susject!
    CallsA, * .From time to time, as necessaty, Plant Operator shall cash Call. from Producers; and Products shall pay or cause te beHalaman 36 dari 60 halaman Putusan Nomor 1427/B/PK/PJK/2017Paid o Plant Operates in G3 dollars their respectlveshares, separately determined as Provided im Section 4.01 ofthe Agreement, of Projected net cash Fequirements For eachof:(a) Plant Operating Cases; and(5) the easts ef Currently Funded Capital Projectsfor a calendar senth SF Prt thereof, as get ferth in suchCash
    Projects shall be Feconcl led a5 quickly agPracticable with such fevised estimates o: determination.Gambar V.
    En@ cash call aexetSucceeding the issuance mE the debit AcK feferred to inSection 3 below shall be reduced By =R# ameunt of suchSXcees.To the extent Practicable, Plant Operater shail Places thefunds received Pursuant t> cash calle in iaterestearningSCceunes; all interes earned Ehereaon shall be credited esPlant Cperating Coses and netice af SUCH amounts ahall Bedelivered ta the Producers,Gambar VI.
    To the extent that funds are then held inthe Badak Payment Account the Trustes shall, prompily upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Podok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,Porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Portamina and the Contrastors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10poyalde to
Register : 27-05-2009 — Putus : 08-04-2014 — Upload : 30-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.51800/PP/M.IA/13/2014
Tanggal 8 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
22463
  • 17 Tahun 2000, dapat dikurangkan sebagai biaya;bahwa sesuai dengan bukti pendukung yang Pemohon Banding berikan bahwapemberi jasa manajemen (PT.Detpak Singapore) adalah penduduk (tax of resident)negara Singapura, karenanya atas transaksi antara Pemohon Banding denganSingapura berlaku Tax Treaty antara Indonesia dengan Singapura sebagaimanadisebutkan dalam Pasal 5 ayat (2) huruf (i) Tax Treaty antara Indonesia denganSingapura :MenimbangMenimbangMenimbangMenimbangThe term Permanent establishment shall
    Tax Treaty antara Indonesia dengan Singapura menegaskan bahwa istilah bentukusaha tetap terutama meliputi pemberian jasajasa, termasuk jasajasa konsultanoleh suatu perusahaan melalui seorang karyawan atau pegawai lainnya dimanakegiatan itu berlangsung (untuk proyek yang sama atau yang berhubungan), untuksuatu masa atau masamasa yang berjumlah lebih dari 90 hari dalam 12 bulan.Selanjutnya ketentuan Pasal 7 ayat (1) Tax Treaty tersebut menegaskan :The profits of an enterprise of a contracting state shall
Register : 06-05-2020 — Putus : 07-06-2021 — Upload : 09-06-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA UTARA Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Utr
Tanggal 7 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
PT. TIRTA MEDIKA NUSANTARA
Tergugat:
1.PT. TIRTA MEDIKA JAYA
2.CLEARBRIDGE MEDICAL ASIA PTE LTD
3.PT. GENESIS KAPITAL INVESTAMA
4.Wahdini Syafrina S Tala, S.H., M.Kn
5.KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA c.q DIREKTORAT JENDERAL ADMINISTRASI HUKUM UMUM
632678
  • In respect of the capital structure of the Company,Clearbridge and the Vendor Shareholders agree and undertake to execute,on date of this Agreement, a shareholders circular resolution thatapproves the following classification of Shares (Classification ofShares):(a) 89% of the issued and paidup share capital of theCompany as at the date of this Agreement shall be classified asClass A Shares, where each Class A Share shall have nominalvalue of IDR 100,000 and carry voting rights and entitlement toreceive
    The Class A Shares as a whole shall carry100% of the voting rights at any meeting of the Shareholders.Halaman 7 dari 41 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.
    be classified asClass B Shares, where each Class B Share shall have nominalvalue of IDR 100,000 and carry no voting rights but withentitlement to receive dividends.
    Pursuant to Classification ofShares, Genesis shall hold 14,300 Class B Shares, representing11% of the issued and paid up shares of the Company.Article 2.3.
    Berikut kami kutipkan ketentuan didalam Perjanjian Pemegang Saham April 2018 yang mengatur mengenaipilihan hukum (governing law) dari Perjanjian Pemegang Saham April 2018:33.1 This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordancewith, the laws of Singapore.33.2 The parties agree to submit to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of thecourts of Singapore.Halaman 31 dari 41 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.
Register : 01-02-2012 — Putus : 25-02-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.43422/PP/M.VIII/12/2013
Tanggal 25 Februari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
151115
  • representative of Baker for the marketing andpromotion of the sale of the Product and supply of services to customers (other thanexcluded Customers) in the Territory subject to the term and conditions of thisAgreementAngka 6 Comission6.1 In consideration of and in full payment of the Representative for fulfillment ofall its obligations under or pursuant to this Agreement, and in full and final settlementof all costs and expenses incurred by the Representative under or pursuant to thisAgreement , Baker Shall
    rates og Net Invoice Sales;Percentage as staged in Schedul 5 in respect of all sales and supply of productsServices pursuant to orders procured solely by the representative from customers inTerritory and accepted by Baker during the term of agreementRefrences in this Clauses 6.1 are limited to customer to whom the representative isappointed under this agreement to promote and market the sale of products andthe supply of services6.2 No Later than 45 days after termination of this agreement Baker Shall
    pay therepresentative any commission which has become due to it under this agreementprior to termination, in addition, Baker shall following termination pay to theRepresentative commission, within 30 days of such becoming due as provided inClause 6.4, in respect of sales concluded by Baker after termination in respect oforders procured and referred to Baker by the Representative prior to termination ,provided that :(a) Commision will only be due to the Representative on sales of products andorder
Register : 10-08-2009 — Putus : 19-08-2010 — Upload : 18-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1388/Pdt.G/2009/PN.JKT.SEL.
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2010 —
350667
  • Ketentuantersebut berbunyi :in all cases, the Arbitral Tribunal shall act fairly and impartiallyand ensure that each party has a reasonable opportunity to presentits case1 Tindakan tidak pantasHal ini diatur dalam beberapa ketentuan antara lain :3 Pasal 32 UU No. 4/2004 yang mewajibkan hakim (termasuk arbiter)memiliki integritas, kepribadian tidak tercela, jujur dan adil.
    Save with the approval of the Arbitral Tribunal and the parties,persons not involved in the proceedings shall not be admitted. 2 Pasal 5 ayat (1) UU No. 4/2004 yang melarang hakim (termasuk arbiter)untuk bertindak diskriminatif3 Pasal 15 ayat (2) ICC Rules yang menegaskan larangan bertindak partial.Pada setiap bentuk tindakan yang disebut di atas, secara inklusif dengansendirinya menurut hukum melekat iktikad tidak baik.
    It shall also apply to arbitral awardsnot conseidered as domestic awards in the State where their recognition andenforcement are soughtTerjemahan :Konvensi ini berlaku terhadap pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitraseyang dibuat dalam wilayah suatu Negara selain Negara dimana pengakuan danpelaksanaan putusan arbitrase tersebut dimintakan, dan timbul karena adanyaperbedaan subyek, baik orang maupun badan hukum.
    1 :The Respondent shall pay interest on the total amount payable, as specified inparagraph 8&6 (c), from the date of registration of this Final Award under Article59 of the Indonesian Arbitration Law or the obtaining of an order of exequaturHal 15 dari 48 hal.
    Klausula ini berbunyi:Except as provided in this Section, arbitration shall be conducted inJakarta, in accordance with the rules of Arbitration of the InternationalChamber of CommerceTerjemahan:Kecuali diatur lain dalam bagian ini, Arbitrase dilaksanakan di Jakarta,Sesuai dengan Peraturan Arbitrase International Chamber of commercePrinsip menentukan katagori putusan arbitrase yang didasarkan pada patokanteritorial/wilayah hukum sebagaimana disebut dalam pasal 1.9 jo.
Putus : 09-08-2016 — Upload : 14-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1106 K/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 9 Agustus 2016 — PT AGILITY INTERNASIONAL lawan PT INDOEXIM INTERNASIONAL
359229 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • All disputes arising from this contract shall be binding and be finallysettled under the administrative and procedural Rules of Arbitration ofBadan Arbitrasi National Indonesia (BANI) by arbitrators appointed inaccordance with said rules."
    examination.While the examination is being carried out, the consignee for theimport goods or the consigner for the export goods shall be presentand responsible for moving the goods and opening and restoring thepackage.
    (i) /n no circumstances whatsoever shall the company be liable tothe customer or owner for consequential loss or loss of markethowever caused;(ii) Without prejudice to any other conditions herein or otherdefences which may be open to the company, In nocircumstances whatsoever shall the company be liable to thecustomer or owner for delay or deviation however caused in asum in excess of twice the company own charges in respect ofthe relevant transaction;16.
    In no case whatsoever shall any liability of the Company, howeverarising, and notwithstanding that the cause of loss or damage beunexplained, exceed;(i) The value of the relevant goods, or(ii) A sum at the rate of USD 1,000.00per tonne of1,000 kilos on thegross weight of the relevant goods, whichever shall be the least."Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:"Bagian syaratsyarat umum klausula 15 dan 16:15. (i) Dalam situasi apa pun Perusahaan tidak berkewajiban kepadaHalaman 27 dari 36 hal. Put.
Putus : 22-12-2014 — Upload : 01-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 820/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 22 Desember 2014 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. SINARINDO GERBANGMAS
6637 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For the purposes of this Agreement an individual, who is a member of adiplomatic or consular mission of one of the tno States in the other Stateor in a third State and who is a national of the sending State, shall bedeemed to be a resident of the sending State if he is submitted therein tothe same obligations in respect of taxes on income as are residents ofthat State;Article 11Halaman 10 dari 35 halaman Putusan Nomor 820/B/PK/PJK/20144..
    Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident of theother State may be taxed in that other State.Hovever, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which it ansesand according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial omer of theinterest is a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall notexceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.Notwthstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest ansing in one ofthe two States shall be taxable only in the
    be taxable only in the other State if the beneficialowner of the interest is a resident of the other State and if the interest ispaid on a loan made for a period of more than 2 years or is paid inconnection wth the sale on credit of any industrial, commercial orscientific equipment.The competent authorities of the two States shall by mutual agreementsettle the mode of application of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.Bahwa Paragraf 3 Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) nomor07 menyatakan :Pihakpihak
    Dalam Article 1 Loan Agreement tersebut disebutkan bahwa "interestrate shall mean the 6 (six) months LIBOR prevailing on the interestperiod. The calculation of this interest rate shall become effective asfrom the date of the loan agreement. Pasal tersebut jelas menyebutkantingkat bunga yang dibebankan dan sejak kapan perhitungan tingkatbunga berlaku efektif.
    Any informationreceived by one of the two States shall be treated as secret in the samemanner as information obtained under the domestic laws of that State andshall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts andadministrative bodies) involved in the assessment or collection of, theenforcement in respect of, or the determination of appeals in relation to, thetaxes covered by the Agreement. Such persons or authorities shall use theinformation only for such purposes.
Register : 23-03-2017 — Putus : 08-06-2017 — Upload : 24-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 655 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ORICA MINING SERVICE;
9663 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • of any assistance that is ancillary and subsidiary to, and isfurnished as a means of enabling the initial application of, any such propertyor right as is mentioned in subparagraph (a), any such equipment as ismentioned in subparagraph (b) or any such knowledge or information as ismentioned in subparagraph (c); orbahwa lebih jauh pada Article 12 (2) disebutkan:Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise, andaccording to the law of that State, but the tax so charged shall
    Putusan Nomor 655/B/PK/PJK/2017(b) in all other cases 15%.The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall by mutual agreementsettle the mode of application of these limitations.bahwa dalam penjelasan OECD Model Tax Convention On Income and Capital,dijelaskan lebih lanjut pada paragraf 11 sebagai berikut:knowhow is all the undivulged technical information, whether capable ofbeing patented or not, that is necessary for the industrial reproduction of aproduct or process, directly and under
    Putusan Nomor 655/B/PK/PJK/2017(a) in the case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3(b) and (c),and to the extent to which they relate to those royalties, insubparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%; and(b) in all other cases 15%.The competent authorities of the contracting states shall by mutualagreement settle the mode of application of these limitations.3.
    royalti oleh Termohon Peninjauan Kembalikepada Orica Explosives Technology Pty.Ltd adalah terkaitdengan pemakaian know how dan technology dari Orica untukmelakukan jasa peledakan, sehingga pengenaan tarif sebesar10% sudah sesuai dengan Article 12 ayat (2) huruf a danArticle 12 ayat (3) huruf b,c,d, dan f P3B IndonesiaAustraliasebagai berikut:Article 12 ayat (2)Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in whichthey arise, and according to the law of that State, but the tax socharged shall
    not exceed:(a) in the case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3(b)and (c), and to the extent to which they relate to thoseroyalties, in subparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%; and(b) in all other cases 15%.The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall bymutual agreement settle the mode of application of theselimitations.Article 12 ayat (3) huruf aAyat (3) The term "royalties" in this Article means payments,whether periodical or not, and however described or computed,to the extent to which
Register : 09-12-2013 — Putus : 14-10-2014 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.56125/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
16445
  • Nations And The Peoples Republic Of China,dalam melaksanakan kerjasama ACFTA dimaksud disepakati untuk menggunakanRule of Origin (ROO) Form E atau Surat Keterangan Asal Barang Form E, yangdiatur secara rinci dalam Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) ForThe Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area.bahwa berdasarkan Appendix 1: Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP)For The Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 7dinyatakan The Issuing Authorities shall
    Certificate of Origin (Form E), and signed by theauthorised signatory,(b) The origin of the product is in conformity wth the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA;(c) The other statements of the Certificate of Origin (Form E) correspond to supporting documentaryevidence submitted,(d) Description, quantity and weight of products, marks and number of packages, number and kinds ofpackages, as specified, conform to the products to be exported,(e) Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
    be allowed subject to thedomestic laws, regulations and administrative rules of the importing Party provided each item mustqualify separately in its own right.bahwa berdasarkan Annex 3: Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) For TheRules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 3 dinyatakanWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered as whollyproduced or obtained in a Party:Plant and plant products harvested, picked or gathered there,Live animals 2 born and
Register : 22-01-2014 — Putus : 28-08-2014 — Upload : 30-08-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 30/PDT.G/2014/PN.JKT.BAR
Tanggal 28 Agustus 2014 — OMER BALABAN; LAWAN; SUCIENTO WONGSO
18443
  • Bahwa dalam Termination and Release Agreement (Teijemahan : PeianjianPengakhiran dan Pelepasan), Tergugat diwajibkan untuk membayar kepadaPENGGUGAT suatu ganti rugi untuk mengakhiri Peijanjian Keijasamatertanggal15 Februari 2000, yaitu sebesar 200.000 (dua ratus ribu euro) dengan rinciansebagai berikut: 22222222222 eeeArticle 2.1.1. initial payment of 50.000 (fifty thousands Euros) shall be mad onthe date of I* September 2008 ;Halaman 2 dari 39, putusan Nomor : 30/PDT.G/2014/PIN.JKT.BAR.OMER BALASANArticle
    2.1.2 The Second payment instalment of 25,000 (twenty five thousandEuros) shall be made on the date of 30* September 2008; Article 2.1.3 The Third instalment up to final instalment shall be paid by monthlybased payments of 5,000 (five thousand Euros) starting onTerjemahan :2Pasal 2.1.1.
    be paid under the following terms:2.2 Initial payment of 50,000 (fifty thousand Euros) shall be made on the date ofIN01 September 2008; 2.1.2 The second payment instalment of 25,000 (twenty five thousandEuros) shall be made on the date of 30 September 2008; 2.1.3.
    The third instalments up to final instalments shall be paid by monthlybased payments of 5,000 (five thousand Euros) start on October 2008 up toOctober 2010; Teiyemahan:Pasal 2.1 Pihak Pertama dengan ini mengetahui dan setuju untuk membayar kepadaPihak Kedua suatu pembayaran ganti rugi dengan jumlahHalaman 14 dari 39, putusan Nomor : 30/PDT.G/2014/PN. JKT. BA R.OMER BALABANI~total sebesar .200,000 (dua ratus ribu Euro) (PembayaranPenyelesaian) yang dibayarkan di bawah ketentuan berikut: 2.1.1.
    This Termination Asreement shall loose its validitv in the event that the First Party deviates from the contents of Article 2.1 and 2.2 of this Termination Agreement. Halaman 15 dari 39, putusan Nomor : 30/PDT.G/2014/PNJKT.BAR.OMERBALABANTeijemahan: Halaman 16 dari 39, putusan Nomor : 30/PDT.G/2014/PN. JKT. BA R.OMER BALABANPasal 3.3.
Register : 04-02-2020 — Putus : 31-03-2020 — Upload : 31-03-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 98/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 31 Maret 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. LAYAR SENTOSA SHIPPING
Terbanding/Tergugat I : WALLEM & CO LIMITED
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WALLEM SENTOSA SHIPPING SERVICE
6081056
  • WallemSentosa Shipping Corporation" (hereinafter called "the Company)which shall be incorporated under the laws of Republic ofIndonesia as a Perseroan Terbatas (abbreviated as PT). TheCompany may be in such other name as the relevant authorities inthe Republic of Indonesia shall allow and the Parties hereto shallagree.
    Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan Pasal 2.5 JointVenture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Subject to no objection of the principals, Larsen Ship shall transferLarsenShip's Existing Business to the Company when the Companyhas obtained all the licenses, authorizations, consents, or approvalsmentioned in Clause 2.1 above and is ready to commence business.LarsenShip shall endeavour to obtain all required licenses within aperiod of three months from the date of submission of the applicationto BKPM
    WallemSentosa Shipping Corporation (hereinafter called "the Company)which shall be incorporated under the laws of Republic ofIndonesia as a Perseroan Terbatas (abbreviated as PT). TheCompany may be in such other name as the relevant authorities inthe Republic of Indonesia shall allow and the Parties hereto shallagree. The formation of the Company will be done by virtue of theprovisions of the Foreign Investment Law (Law No. 1 of 1967 asamended by law No.
    LarsenShip shall endeavour to obtain allrequired licenses within a period of three months from the date ofsubmission of the application to BKPM.
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 280 B/PK/PJK/2013
Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
5879 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 280/B/PK/PJK/2013For the purposes of this Agreement an individual, who is a memberof a diplomatic or consular mission of one of the two States in theother State or in a third State and who is a national of the sendingState, shall be deemed to be a resident of the sending State if he issubmitted therein to the same obligations in respect of taxes onincome as are residents of that State:Article 11:1.Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident ofthe other State may
    be taxed in that other State,However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which itarises and according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficialowner of the interest is a resident of the other State, the tax socharged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of theinterest,Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising inone of the two States shall be taxable only in the other State to theextent that such interest is derived by:(i) the Government of the
    be taxable only in the other State if thebeneficial owner of the interest is a resident of the other State and ifthe interest is paid on a loan made for a period of more than 2 yearsor is paid in connection with the sale on credit of any industrial,commercial or scientific equipment,The competent authorities of the two States shall by mutualagreement settle the mode of application of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4,Halaman 13 dari 34 halaman.
    20%;Bahwa sebagai bahan acuan, angka 2 huruf h Surat Direktur JenderalPajak Nomor S517/PJ.343/2005 tanggal 24 Juni 2005 tentangPermohonan Penjelasan Dan Konfirmasi Atas Transaksi DenganHubungan Istimewa, menyatakan:Dalam Article 28 P3B antara Pemerintah Indonesia dan PemerintahBelanda (senada juga dengan Article 25 dari P3B Indonesia Inggrisdan Article 26 dari P3B Indonesia Luxemburg) antara lain diatursebagai berikut:Article 28 (Exchange of Information):The competent authority of the two States shall
    Any information received by one of the two States shall betreated as secret in the same manner as information obtained under thedomestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons orauthorities (including courts and administrative bodies) involved in theassessment or collection of, the enforcement in respect of, or thedetermination of appeals in relation to, the taxes covered by theAgreement. Such persons or authorities shall use the information onlyfor such purposes.
Register : 04-11-2013 — Putus : 14-10-2014 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.56129/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
21365
  • Nations And The Peoples Republic Of China,dalam melaksanakan kerjasama ACFTA dimaksud disepakati untuk menggunakanRule of Origin (ROO) Form E atau Surat Keterangan Asal Barang Form E, yangdiatur secara rinci dalam Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) ForThe Rules Of Origin Of The ASEANChina Free Trade Area.bahwa berdasarkan Appendix 1: Revised Operational Certification Procedures (Ocp)For The Rules Of Origin Of The ASEANChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 7dinyatakan The Issuing Authorities shall
    notes of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), and signed by theauthorised signatory,The origin of the product is in conformity with the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,The other statements of the Certificate of Origin (Form E) correspond to supporting documentaryevidence submitted,Description, quantity and weight of products, marks and number of packages, number and kinds ofpackages, as specified, conform to the products to be exported,Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
    be allowed subject to thedomestic laws, regulations and administrative rules of the importing Party provided each item mustqualify separately in its own right.bahwa berdasarkan Annex 3: Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) For TheRules Of Origin Of The ASEANChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 3 dinyatakanWithin the meaning of Rule 2 (a), the following shall be considered as whollyproduced or obtained in a Party:Plant and plant products harvested, picked or gathered there,Live animals 2 born and
Putus : 19-10-2017 — Upload : 14-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1460 K/Pdt/2017
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2017 — PT. IGAS UTAMA VS PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, dk
330240 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and become bindingto both parties.(terjemahan bebas:1. Perjanjian ini dibuat dan tunduk pada hukum yang berlaku diRepublik Indonesia.2. Para Pihak setuju untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan yang timbuldari perjanjian ini dengan dengan itikad baik secara musyawarah.3.
    Saidarbitration shall take place in Jakarta. Any Party may commencearbitration by the giving of written notice of commencement ofarbitration to the other Party. Arbitration shall be conducted inEnglish by a panel of 3 (Three) arbitrators appointed in accordancewith the Rules. Awards rendered in any arbitration hereunder shallbe final and conclusive and judgement thereon may be entered intoany court having jurisdiction for enforcement of the results of anyarbitration.
    Said arbitration shall takeplace in Jakarta. Any Party may commence arbitration by giving ofwritten notice of commencement of arbitration to the other Party.Arbitration shall be conducted in English by a panel of 3 (three)arbitrations appointed in accordance with the Rules. Awardsrendered in any arbitration hereunder shall be final and conclusiveHalaman 28 dari 68 hal. Put.
    The arbitration shall be held in Jakarta, Indonesia:Hal ini secara tegas menentukan ICC yang akan menyelesaikanperselisihan paham yang timbul karena Agreement ini sesuaiperaturanperaturan yang berlaku bagi ICC;Dengan demikian para pihak dengan tegastegas telahmenentukan ICC sebagai badan arbitrase untuk menyelesaikanperselisihan faham (disputes) yang timbul berdasarkan agreement;44.
    For that purpose, an arbitration clause that forms part of acontract shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other termsof the contract. A decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract is nulland void shall not entail ipso jure the invalidity of the arbitration clause;Halaman 43 dari 68 hal. Put.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 29-08-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT CNOOC SES Ltd vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
7752 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Hal inikarena PSC telah berlaku terlebin dahulu daripada Tax TreatyIndonesiaMalaysia dan berlaku mengikat sampai dengan berakhirnyajangka waktu kontrak/PSC di Tahun 2018;Bahwa pada seksi V angka 1.2 (r) Production Sharing Contract tanggal 26Desember 1991 menyatakan The Contractor shall severally pay to thegovernment the income tax including the final tax on profits after taxdeduction imposed on it pursuant to the income tax law and itsimplementing regulations.
    Contractor shall comply with the requirements ofthe tax law in particular with respect to filling of returns, assessment of taxand keeping and showing of books and records;Halaman 34 dari 70 halaman.
    Lihat pula Seksi V angka 1.2 (r) PSC PemohonPeninjauan Kembali yang menyatakan bahwa:The Contractor shall severally pay to the Government of the Republic ofIndonesia the Income Tax including the final tax on profits after taxdeduction imposed on it pursuant to the Indonesian Income Tax Law andits implementing regulations.
    Berikut adalah kutipan butir 5 Protoco/ Tax TreatyIndonesia Malaysia:In connection with Article 10 "Dividends", nothing in this Article shall affectthe provisions contained in any Production Sharing Contracts relating tothe exploitation and production of oil and natural gas which have beennegotiated with the Government of Indonesia or the relevant state oilcompany of Indonesia, provided that a company which is resident inMalaysia deriving income from a Production Sharing Contract shall not beless
    Periodically, PERTAMINA and CONTRACTOR shall meet to discussthe conduct of the Petroleum Operations envisaged under thisContract and will make every effort to settle amicably any problemarising therefrom.1.2. Disputes, if any, arising between PERTAMINA and CONTRACTORrelating to this Contract or the interpretation and performance of anyof the clauses of this Contract, and which cannot be settled amicably,shall be submitted to the decision of arbitration.....
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1829 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
270209 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Hal inikarena PSC telah berlaku terlebih dahulu daripada Tax Treaty IndonesiaMalaysia dan berlaku mengikat sampai dengan berakhirnya jangka waktukontrak/PSC di Tahun 2018;Bahwa pada seksi V angka 1.2 (r) Production Sharing Contract tanggal 26Desember 1991 menyatakan The Contractor shall severally pay to thegovernment the income tax including the final tax on profits after taxdeduction imposed on it pursuant to the income tax law and itsimplementing regulations.
    Lihat pula Seksi V angka 1.2 (r) PSC PemohonPeninjauan Kembali yang menyatakan bahwa:The Contractor shall severally pay to the Government of the Republic ofIndonesia the Income Tax including the final tax on profits after taxdeduction imposed on it pursuant to the Indonesian Income Tax Law andits implementing regulations.
    This Contract shall come into effect on the Effective Date.Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia adalah:4.1. Kontrak ini akan berlaku pada Tanggal Efektif.(Penambahan huruf tebal dari Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali);Section .2. angka 2.8 PSC:Halaman 49 dari 67 halaman Putusan Nomor 1829/B/PK/PJK/201721.2.8.
    Berikut adalah kutipan butir 5 Protocol Tax TreatyIndonesia Malaysia:In connection with Article 10 "Dividends", nothing in this Article shall affectthe provisions contained in any Production Sharing Contracts relating tothe exploitation and production of oil and natural gas which have beennegotiated with the Government of Indonesia or the relevant state oilcompany of Indonesia, provided that a company which is resident inMalaysia deriving income from a Production Sharing Contract shall not beless
    Periodically, PERTAMINA and CONTRACTOR shall meet to discussthe conduct of the Petroleum Operations envisaged under thisContract and will make every effort to settle amicably any problemarising therefrom.1.2. Disputes, if any, arising between PERTAMINA and CONTRACTORrelating to this Contract or the interpretation and performance of anyof the clauses of this Contract, and which cannot be settled amicably,shall be submitted to the decision of arbitration.....