Ditemukan 2113 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 29-10-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 651/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 29 Oktober 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT LINCOLN ELECTRIC INDONESIA
6037 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Normally, distributions by a companywhich have the effect of reducing the membership rights, for instance,payments constituting a reimbursement of capital in any formwhatever, are not regarded as dividends;Paragraf 29;The benefits to which a holding in a company confer entitlement are,as a general rule, available solely to the shareholders themselves;Should, however, certain of such benefits be made available topersons who are not shareholders within the meaning of company law,they may constitute
    The reliefs provided in the Articleapply so long as the State of which the paying company is aresident taxes such benefits as dividends. It is immaterial whetherany such benefits are paid out of current profits made by thecompany or are derived, for example, from reserves, .e. profits ofprevious financial years.
    companywhich have the effect of reducing the membership rights, forinstance, payments constituting a reimbursement of capital in anyform whatever, are not regarded as dividends;(Suatu pembayaran disebut sebagai ddividen termasuk tidakhanya distribusi laba yang diputuskan dalam Rapat UmumPemegang Saham, tetapi juga manfaat/ keuntungan lain baikberupa uang atau bernilai uang, misalnya pembagian sahambonus, bonus,keuntungan dari likuidasi dan distribusi laba secaraterselubung);Paragraf 29;The benefits to which
Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 30-11-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1073/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. GENERAL FOOD INDUSTRIES
11486 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Singapura, menyatakan :Article 9Where :(a) an enterprise of a Contracting State participates directly orindirectly in the management, control or capital of an enterprise ofthe other Contracting State; or(b) the same persons participate directly or indirectly in themanagement, control or capital of an enterprise of a ContractingState and an enterprise of the other Contracting State;and in either case conditions are made or imposed between the twoenterprises in their commercial or financial relations which
    differ fromthose which would be made between independent enterprises, anyHalaman 16 dari 37 halaman.
    Putusan Nomor 1073/B/PK/PJK/2014profits which would, but for those conditions, have accrued to one of theenterprises, but, by reason of those conditions, have not so accrued,may be included in the profits of that enterprise and taxed accordingly,Bahwa berdasarkan hasil pemeriksaan sengketa banding di PengadilanPajak sebagaimana yang telah dituangkan dalam Putusan PengadilanPajak Nomor : Put. 40777/PP/M.XI/13/2012 tanggal 17 Oktober 2012,dapat diketahui :6. 1.6. 2.6. 3.6. 4.Bahwa yang menjadi sengketa
    This can be determined byconsidering whether an independent enterprise in comparablecircumstances would have been willing to payfor the activity ifperformed for it by an independent enterprise or would haveperformed the activity inhouse or itself if the activity is not onefor which the independent enterprise would have been willingto pay or perform for itself, the activity ordinarily should not beconsidered as an intragroup service under the arms lengthprinciple.Bahwa menurut Termohon Peninjauan
Register : 21-10-2016 — Putus : 23-11-2017 — Upload : 28-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 23 Nopember 2017 — Arfan Syafril, Lawan NSB Niderelbe Schiffahrtsgesselschaft MbH & Co.KG,
511551
  • Pengadilan).Bahwa Permohonan PenetapanPengadilan telah dikabulkan oleh PNJaksel dengan dikeluarkannyaPenetapan No. 203 /Pdt.P /2016/PN.JKT.Sel. tertanggal 14September 2016 (Penetapan PNJaksel No. 203/2016).Bahwa Pihak KetigamengatasnamakandenganPerseroanregistered at the Registrar of SouthJakarta District Court under caseregister number746/Padt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel (theCompany), in this matter the ThirdParty and the Company arerepresented by Hendy RizkiHasibuan based on Specific Powerof Attorney which
    dapatditarik kembali untukmengesampingkan, menarik, danmembatalkan setiap dan semuatuduhan, tudingan, perselisihan,perbedaan dan/atau klaim, langsungatau tidak langsung yang dibuat,sehubungan dengan setiap perilaku,pernyataan, tindakan, dugaangangguan, pelanggaran ataukelalaian di antara Para Pihakberkaitan dengan Perseroan, PerkaraPerlawanan atau hubungan komersialdan hukum lainnya di antara ParaPihak.PASAL 2PELAKSANAAN PERDAMAIAN(1) Perseroan bersamasama denganPihak Pertama akan mengajukanopposition which
    is basicallyintended so that the PN Jakselwould cancel PN Jaksel StipulationNo. 203/2016, which is registered atRegistrar of the South JakartaDisitrict Court registered under casenumber 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel dated 21October 2016 (the OppositionCase) between the Company (asChallenger) and dengan First Party(as Challengee), and at the time thisAgreement is drawn up, theexamination of the Opposition Caseat PN Jaksel is still ongoing.5.
Register : 11-02-2019 — Putus : 25-04-2019 — Upload : 09-12-2019
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 73/PDT/2019/PT BDG
Tanggal 25 April 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : Hilton Hotel Bandung
Terbanding/Penggugat : Ivan Chrisna
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : Wedding Organizer Testimo
231175
  • Sebab segalaperselisihan yang timbul dari Conference & Event Agreement NoContract WRIGA 100318 tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017 (selanjutnyadisebut SURAT PERJANJIAN) di selesaikan melalui Arbitrase dan dalamhal ini yang berwenang adalah Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesiacabang Bandung sebagaimana Pasal 20 ayat 2 Surat Perjanjian yangmenyatakan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration
    of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui arbitrase sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi.Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Penggugat maupun Tergugat ,jikalaupun Pasal 20 ayat 2
    Bahwa Majelis Hakim PN Bandung secara nyata telah melampauikewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara aquo.Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 20 ayat (2) PerjanjianConference and Event Agreement No Contract: WRIGA 100318tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017, menyebutkan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotellocated under the Rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement wil
    the hotel islocated under the rules of arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotelis located.Bahwa apabila Pembanding/ semula Penggugat Rekonpensimengajukan Gugatan Wanprestasi yang merupakan Gugatanperselisihan yang timbul akibat dari pelaksanaan suatu perjanjian,maka seharusnya dilakukan secara terpisah dengan perkara ini dantidak diajukan bersamasama dengan Perkara ini
    the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui ARBITRASE sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi ;Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Pembanding
Register : 26-09-2013 — Putus : 14-10-2014 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.56117/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 14 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
14868
  • atau lebih dimasukkan kedalam pos ini, sebagaimana kutipan berikut:Alloy steels of this subChapter include :1) Alloy engineering and structural steels usually containing the followingelements : chromium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon andvanadium.2) Alloy steels having improved tensile strength and welding propertiescontaining in particular very small quantities of boron (0.0008 % or moreby weight) or of niobium (0.06 % or more by weight).3) Alloy steels, containing chromium or copper, which
Putus : 03-02-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 942/B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 3 Februari 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. PINDO DELI PULP AND PAPER MILLS
6131 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • memutuspermohonan Banding atas keputusan/ketetapan yang diterbitkan olehPejabat yang berwenang sepanjang peraturan perundangundangan yangterkait yang mengatur sedemikian";Bahwa Pasal 11 Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda antaraPemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Kerajaan Belanda,menyatakan:Ayat (1), "Interest arising in one of the two States and paid to a resident ofthe other State may be taxed in that other State";Ayat (2), "However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which
    bungalainnya sebesar Rp121.958.100,00, dapat Wajib Pajak sampaikan halhalsebagai berikut:Bahwa Terbanding dalam tahap pemeriksaan melakukan koreksi positifobjek PPh Pasal 26 atas bunga yang diperoleh CVI GVF (LUX) MasterS.A.R.L. sebesar Rp121.958.100,00 dengan tarif PPh Pasal 26 sebesar10% dari jumlah bruto bunga yang dibayarkan;Bahwa Pasal 11 ayat (2) Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda antaraIndonesia dan Luxembourg, menyatakan "However, such interest may alsobe taxed in the Contracting State in which
    Itmakes plain that the State of source is not obliged to give up taxingrights over interest income merely because that income wasimmediately received by a resident of a State with which the Stateof source had concluded a convention. The term "beneficial owner"is not used in a narrow technical sense, rather, it should beHalaman 29 dari 40 halaman.
    For thesereasons, the report from the Committee on Fiscal Affairs entitled"Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Conduit Companies"concludes that a conduit company cannot normally be regarded asthe beneficial owner if, though the formal owner, it has, as apractical matter, very narrow powers which render it, in relation tothe income concerned, a mere fiduciary or administrator acting onaccount of the interested parties;Berdasarkan ketentuan pada paragraph 10, maka dapat disampaikan:Negara tempat
    YahyaHarahap SH, Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan,Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yangdijatuhkan merupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembanganhukum (law development), sehingga pada hakekatnya
Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1526 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. CHARABOT SA;
5234 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • harus dipenuhi agar Indonesia dalamhal ini dapat mengenakan pajak, Pemohon Banding dalam halini walau memiliki kehadiran yang permanen, namun tidakmenjalankan usaha di tempatnya tersebut;Bahwa pada Pasal 5 ayat (3) huruf e dari P3B IndonesiaPerancis, dinyatakan bahwa "the term permanent establishmentshall not be deemed to include: ...the maintenance of a fixedplace of business solely for the purpose of advertising, for thesupply of information, for scientific research, or for similaractivities which
    Hal ini sudah dengan amatjelas diatur di P3B, dan Pemohon Banding sudah amat jelasmemenuhi ketentuan bahwa kantor di Indonesia bukanlah BUT.Kegiatan usaha dilakukan langsung oleh kantor pusat, danpenghasilan juga diterima langsung oleh kantor pusat;Bahwa Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B Indonesia Perancis menyebutkanbahwa "for the purposes of this convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which thebusiness of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on";Bahwa hal ini
    dari struktur organisasi tersebut terlihat bahwa kantorperwakilan (representative office) CHARABOT SA yang ada diIndonesia tersebut tidak melakukan kegiatan usaha seperti usahauntuk produksi, usaha penjualan/perdagangan (ekspor/impor)tetapi hanya sekedar kegiatan riset pemasaran produkprodukKantor Pusatnya;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (1) P3B IndonesiaPerancis,dijelaskan sebagai berikut:"For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanentestablishment" means a fixed place of business in which
    kegiatanusaha yang berorientasi profit dan hanya sekedar kegiatan risetpemasaran produkproduk Kantor Pusatnya saja;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (2) P3B IndonesiaPerancis,disebutkan bahwa:"The term "permanent establishment" shall include especially :(a) a place of management", (b) a branch, (c) an office, (d) afactory, (e) a workshop, (f) a farm or plantation, (g) a mine, an oilwell, quarry or other place of extraction of natural resources, (h)abuilding site or construction or assembly project which
    Putusan Nomor 1526 B/PK/PJK/2017Permanent Establishment adalah kegiatan yang bersifatpersiapanataupenunjang (preparatory or auxiliary)untuk kepentingan penduduk dan bukan kepentinganpihak lain; Bahwa hal tersebut juga ditegaskan dalam CommentaryOECD Model Tax Convention atas Paragraf 4 article 5yang menyebutkan:"This paragraph lists a number of business activitieswhich are treated as exceptions to the general definitionlaid down in paragraph 1 and which are not permanentestablishments, even if the
Register : 21-07-2017 — Putus : 15-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1519 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 15 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
7765 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixed placeof business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, in general,prepatory or auxilary Activities;Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory orauxilaiary character and those which have not.
    Putusan Nomor 1519/B/PK/PJK/201 7Pasal 5 ayat (1):For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2):List of PE positive definition:Sor re W =Place of Management;Branch;Office;Factory;Workshop;Mine, oil or gas well, quarry or any other place of extraction ofnatural Resources;Pasal 5 ayat (4):Tempat Usaha yang dikecualikan sebagai BUT/PESuatu tempat usaha tidak
Register : 02-11-2011 — Putus : 10-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.42591/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 10 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12534
  • In exceptional cases where the Certificate of Origin (Form E) has not beenissued by the time of shipment or no later than three (3) days from the date ofshipment, at the request of the exporter, the Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall beissued retroactively in accordance with the domestic laws, regulations andadministrative rules of the exporting Party within twelve (12) months from the date ofshipment, in which case it is necessary fo indicate ISSUED RETROACTIVELY?
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 536/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — CV. PUJIMA GOARNA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
2817 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • kelihatanmemenuhi syarat kedua karena pembuatannya dengan cara injectionmoulding, karena untuk masuk pos 64.02 harus memenuhi syaratpembuatannya dengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusukatau dengan cara semacam itu.Bahwa pada penjelasan pos 64.02 pada halaman XIl 64021Explanatory Notes, Fifth Edition , Volume 3, dinyatakan : The Headingcovers, inter alia:(a) Ski boots consisting of several moulded parts hinged on rivets orsimilar devices;(6) Clogs without quarter or counter, the uppers of which
    are producedin one piece usually attached to the base or platform by riveting;(c) Slippers or mules without quarter or counter,the uppers of which,being produced in one piece or assembled other than by stitching,are attached to the sole by stitching;(d) Sandals consiting of straps across the instep and counter orheelstrap attached to the sole by any process;(e) Thongtype sandals in which the thongs are attached to the sole byplugs which lock into holes in the sole;(f) Nonwaterproof footwear produced
Register : 03-06-2015 — Putus : 11-05-2016 — Upload : 13-10-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 339/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 11 Mei 2016 — KZI SINGAPORE PTE.LTD, lawan 1. PT. ASURANSI RECAPITAL, 2. PT. PUTRA SAMUDRA (dalam pailit),
324214
  • Jkt.Sel2.4.22011, 2.4 Addendum to Agreement No. : 01/PSKZIAI/2011Dated November 7, 2012 between the OBLIGEE and thePRINCIPAL which contract is inherent wthin this bondYang memiliki teryemahan bebas sebagai berikut:DISEPAKATI OLEH PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN INI,bahva kami PT. PUTRA SAMUDRA, Buaran Regency Suite 8 10, Jl.
    accesoir juga termaktub dalam paragraf2Advance Payment Bond dan paragraf 1Performance Bond,yang berbunyi sebagai berikut:Advance Payment BondWHEREAS PRINCIPAL has entered into a legal contract wththe Obligee for the cooperation and investment for building aconcentrator (Pembangunan Pabrik Pengolah Logam dariBahan Tambang (Concenrator) Proyek Pertambangan BogorBarat)by witten Agreement No : 01/PSKZI/II/2011, datedFebruary 23, 2011 and Addendum to Agreement No01/PSKZINV/2011, dated November 01, 2011 which
    Addendum to Agreement No. :01/PSKZIAI/2011 Dated November 7, 2012 between theOBLIGEE and the PRINCIPAL which contract is inherent wthinthis bondAtau dalam terjemahan bebasnya berbunyi :1... suatu perjanjian atas Pembangunan Concentrator Plantdi Sukamulih Kec. Suka Jaya, Kab.
    Jdika PRINSIPAL gagal untuk menyelesaikan pembangunanfasilitasfasilitas konsentrator (pililhan penuh) dalam jangka satu tahunsejak Addendum atas Perjanjian Nomor : 01/PSKZI/I/2011,tanggal 1 November 2011, Obligee berhak untuk mengklaim seluruhnilai BondPerformance Bond... firmly by these present that if the PRINCIPAL fails to fulfill hisobligation in the Performance of the contract which has been avardedto him under the OBLIGEE notice of award and which is to be laterconfirmed by a contract for Pembangunan
    Bogor Jabar, AgreementNo. : 01/PSKZI/I/2011 Dated February 23, 2011, Addendum toAgreement No. : 01/PSKZI/II/2011 Dated November 01, 2011, 2"4Addendum to Agreement No. : 01/PSKZI/1/2011 Dated November017, 2012 between the OBLIGEE and the PRINCIPAL which contractis inherent wthin this bond.Yang memiliki teriemahan bebas sebagai berikut:.
Register : 04-08-2017 — Putus : 14-09-2017 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1527 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 September 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BHLN KOMATSU LOGISTICS CORP;
5236 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • This paragraf lists a number of business activities which are treated asexceptions to the general definition laid down in paragraf 1 and which are notpermanent establishments, even if the activity is carried on through a fixedplace of business. The common feature of these activities is that they are, ingeneral, prepatory or auxilary activities.Bahwa selanjutnya dalam paragraf 24 Commentary on Article 5 paragraf 4disebutkan:24.
    It is often to distinguish between actvities which have a prepatory or auxilaiarycharacter and those which have not.
    Jikaperusahaan menjalankan usahanya seperti yang dikatakansebelumnya, laba dari perusahaan itu bisa dikenakan pajak di Negaralain itu, tetapi hanya mengenai bagian laba yang dianggap berasaldari pendirian tetap tersebut.OECD MODEL 2008Pasal 5 ayat (1)For the purposes of this Convention, the term permanentestablishment means a fixed place of business through which thebusiness of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on;Pasal 5 ayat (2)List of PEpositive definition:Place of managementBranchOfficeFactoryWorkshopor
Author : Rahmat S.S. Soemadipradja;
Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Keadaan Memaksa (Syarat-syarat pembatalan perjanjian yang disebabkan keadaan memaksa/force majeure)
834427334
  • adanya negosiasi di antara para pihak dalam perjanjian
  • But if the debtor would not have been liablein that hypothetic case because he would have been entitled to invoke forcemajeure, he now will not be liable either.For the Debtor's Account Pursuant to the Law(2); Use of ThingsWhere, in the performance of an obligation, a thing is used which is unfit forthe purpose, the resulting failure is attributed to the debtor unless this wouldbe unreasonable in view of the terms and necessary implication of the juridicalact from which the obligation arises, generally
    Internasional12/13/2010 11:40:20 PM 9 Rev3Final Setting Buku Penjelasan Hukum tentang Keadaan Memaksa.ingg 27but which appeared corrosive when used on aluminium.
    See art. 6:204 DCC regarding undue payment and art. 6:273DCC regarding the setting aside of a contract.For the Debtors Account Pursuant to a ContractThe second group of accountabilities is formed by contractual arrangements.As a result of the freedom of contract, the parties are free to decide which risksshall be borne by the debtor and which shall be borne by the creditor.
    Anabnormal illnesses however, for which this debtor is more susceptible thanother persons, will be attributed to him (no force majeure).The Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) has passed an interesting judgment regardingthe frequent case in which a professional seller delivers defective goods,whereas he did not produce the goods himself and is in good faith regardingtheir quality.
    In certain cases, the occurrence of force majeure can constitute anunforeseen circumstance, which allows the judge to alter the contract if one ofthe parties (here: the creditor) so demands.
Putus : 30-06-2015 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 307/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 30 Juni 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
5946 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which it arisesand according to the laws of that State, but if the Beneficial Owner of theinterest is a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall notexceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.3.
    Commentary on Article 11 Paragraph 9the State of source is not obliged to give up taxing rights overinterest income merely because that income wasimmediatelyreceived by a resident of a State with which the Stateof source had concluded a convention.
    For these reasons, the report from theCommittee on Fiscal Affairs entitled "Double TaxationConventions and the Use of Conduit Companies" concludes thata conduit company cannot normally be regarded as the BeneficialOwner if; though the formal owner, it has, as a practical matter,very narrow powers which render it, in relation to the incomeconcerned, a mere fiduciary or administrator acting on account ofthe interested parties.c.
    Yahya HarahapSH, Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktiandan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yang dijatuhkanmerupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembangan hukum (lawdevelopment), sehingga pada hakekatnya
Register : 24-06-2016 — Putus : 27-12-2016 — Upload : 23-05-2017
Putusan PN TANJUNG PINANG Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2016/PN Tpg
Tanggal 27 Desember 2016 — NICHOLAS MARK OGDEN( Penggugat) PT. BINTAN LAGOON RESOR ( Tergugat)
10533
  • Tpgberkaitan juga dengan VILLA HOUSE RULES VERSION 1.1.2016 yangmenjadi Objek perkara a quo;Pasal 1.1 PERJANJIAN INDUK Terjemahannya (kutipan):(kutipan):Resort means the resort Resor diartikan sebagai resorsituated in LagoiBintan known yang terdapat di LagoiBintanas Bintan Lagoon Resort which yang dikenal sebagai Bintanis owned,operated and Lagoon Resort yang dimiliki,managed by the First Party. dioperasikan , serta dikelolaoleh Pihak Pertama.Dari dan oleh karenanya adalah tepat sasaran dan cukup
    Kutipan Pasal Terjemahannya dalamTata Tertib Vila Bahasa Indonesia Management Company, in which such kepada pihak ketiga denganconsent shall not be unreasonably persetujuan tertulis terlebihwithheld or delayed. dahulu = dari PerusahaanPengelola in casu, Tergugatl,persetujuan mana tidak akanditahan secara tidak wajar.
    Tpg Kutipan Pasal Terjemahannya dalamPerjanjian Pengelolaan Vila Bahasa IndonesiaArticle 8.1: Pasal 8.1:Villa Membership shall be defined as Keanggotaan Vila harusthe Resort membership accorded to the diartikan sebagaiVilla and which may not be separated keanggotaan Resorfrom the Villa.
    Further, where such functionor party is intended to be held on anypart of BLR outside such Resident'sVilla, the theprior approval ofManagement Company must beobtained for such use, which approvalshall not be unreasonably withheld ordelayed. For the purpose of this Articlea function or party shall be deemed tobe any gathering of 8(eight) or morepersons.
    Kutipan Pasal Terjemahannya dalam Perjanjian Sewa Vila Bahasa Indonesiaditentukan.Article 13.2: Pasal 13.2:On termination of this Agreement by Pada pengakhiranthe First Party under Section 13.1, all Perjanjian ini oleh Pihakpayment which have been paid by the Pertama berdasarkan PasalSecond Party to the First Party shall 13.1, seluruh pembayaranbecome the property of the First Party yang telah dibayarkan olehand the First Party shall not be obliged Pihak Kedua kepada Pihakto refund any or all of
Register : 25-03-2013 — Putus : 08-04-2014 — Upload : 30-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.51807/PP/M.VIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 8 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
10923
  • mempertimbangkan apakah bagian upper berlubang atau tidak,asalkan Alas Kaki dimaksud memenuhi kriteria dimaksud butir 7.1 di atas, harusdiklasifikasi pada Pos 64.01.bahwa sesuai dengan struktur pos tarif 64.01 di dalam Buku Tarif KepabeananIndonesia Tahun 2012, sebagai berikut :64.016401.10.00.006401.92.00.00Alas kaki tahan air dengan sol luar dan Waterproof footwear with outer solesbagian atas dari karet atau dari plastik, and uppers of rubber or of plastics, ttbagian atasnya tidak dijpasang pada uppers of which
Register : 16-08-2012 — Putus : 25-07-2013 — Upload : 27-11-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.46494/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 25 Juli 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11529
  • The classification of certain motor vehicles in this heading is determineo by certainfeatures which indicate that the vehicles are designed for the transport of goodsrather than for the transport of persons (heading 87.03)..."
Putus : 10-07-2019 — Upload : 30-10-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2058/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 10 Juli 2019 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT AGRO BUKIT
25193 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 2058/B/PK/Pjk/2019debtor's profits, and in particular, income from government securities andincome from bonds or debentures but shall not include any item which istreated as a distribution under the provisions of Article 10 of thisAgreement; sehingga Keputusan Terbanding sekarang PemohonPeninjauan Kembali dilakukan secara terukur dan olehkarenanya koreksiTerbanding (sekarang Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali) dalam perkara aquo tetap dipertahankan karena telah sesuai dengan ketentuanperaturan
Register : 28-02-2013 — Putus : 10-09-2014 — Upload : 06-04-2016
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-55044/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 10 September 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
292166
  • s.d.3 adalah 8207.19.00.00, yaitu:lainlain, termasuk bagian dari perkakas untuk mengebor batu karang atau mengebor tanah dari jenis yangdapat dipertukarkan untuk perkakas tangan;bahwa berdasarkan Explanatary Notes to the HS, Chapter 82 disebutkan sebagai berikut:Whereas (apart from a few exceptions such as machine saw blades) the preceding headings of this Chapterapply in the main to hand tools ready for use as they stand or after affixing handles, this heading covers animportant group of tools which
Putus : 30-06-2015 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 306/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 30 Juni 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. WIRAKARYA SAKTI
8861 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, such interest may also be taxed in the State in which it arisesand according to the laws of that State, but if the Beneficial Owner ofHalaman 16 dari 37 halaman. Putusan Nomor 306/B/PK/PJK/2015the interest is a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall notexceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.3.
    Putusan Nomor 306/B/PK/PJK/20158. 2.received by a resident of a State with which the State of sourcehad concluded a convention. The term "Beneficial Owner " is notused in a narrow technical sense, rather, it should be understoodin its context and in light of the object and purposes of theConvention, including avoiding double taxation and the preventionof fiscal evasion and avoidance ;.
    For these reasons, the report from theCommittee on Fiscal Affairs entitled "Double Taxation Conventionsand the Use of Conduit Companies" concludes that a conduitcompany cannot normally be regarded as the Beneficial Owner if;though the formal owner, it has, as a practical matter, very narrowpowers which render it, in relation to the income concerned, amere fiduciary or administrator acting on account of the interestedparties..
    Putusan Nomor 306/B/PK/PJK/2015SH, Hukum Acara Perdata, Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktiandan Putusan Pengadilan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, hal. 830);Bahwa dalam /Yurisprudensi, putusan yang diambil mengandungpertimbangan yang mendasar yaitu ratio decidendi atau basic reason,berupa prinsip hukum yang dijadikan dasar putusan yang diambil (theprinciple of law which the decision is based), dan putusan yang dijatuhkanmerupakan kasus yang berhubungan dengan perkembangan hukum (/awdevelopment),