Ditemukan 9797 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 05-12-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1143/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 5 Desember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BANK ANZ INDONESIA,
80159 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Adapun bentukdan materinya mengacu pada konvensi internasional danketentuan lainnya serta ketentuan perpajakan nasional masingmasing negara.Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B) atau TaxTreaty IndonesiaAustralia, yang mengatur :Article 1:This Agreement shall apply to persons who are residents of oneor both of the Contracting States.Article 4:1.
    A person is not a resident of one of the Contracting statesfor the purposes of this Agreement if the person Is liable totax in that State in respect only of income from sources inthat State.Article 5:An enterprise shall not be deemed to have a permanentestablishment merely by reason of :(a) The use of facilities solely for the purpose of storage ordisplay of goods or merchandise belonging to theenterprise; or(b) The maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandisebelonging to the enterprise solely
    merchandisebelonging to the enterprise solely for the purpose ofprocessing by another enterprise; or (d) the maintenance ofa fixed place of business solely for the purpose ofpurchasing goods or merchandise, or for collectinginformation, for the enterprise; or(e) The maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for thepurpose of activities which have a preparatory or auxiliarycharacter for the enterprise, such as advertising or scientificresearch.Article 7:The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting State shall
    Putusan Nomor 1143/B/PK/PJK/2016(c) Other business activities carried on in that other State of thesame or a similar kind as those carried on through thatpermanent establishment.Article 12:1.Royalties arising in one of the Contracting States, beingroyalties to which a resident of the other Contracting State isbeneficially entitled, may be taxed in that other State.Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State inwhich they arise, and according to the law of that State, butthe tax so charged shall
    not exceed :(a) in the case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3 (b)and (c), and to the extent to which they relate to thoseroyalties, in subparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%; and(6b) in all other cases 15%.The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall bymutual agreement settle the mode of application of theselimitations.The term "royalties" in this Article means payments, whetherperiodical or not, and however described or computed, tothe extent to which they are made as consideration
Upload : 01-06-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2353 K/PDT/2010
PT. ISTANA ARGO KENCANA; PT. PHILIPS INDONESIA
4030 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • berikut:"Without limitation to the rights of the Principal under clause 2.2, theDistributor further acknowledges that the Principal or a PhilipsAssociated Company (or another distributor appointed by thePrincipal or a Philips Associated Company) may sell any of theProducts directly to customers in the Territory in the followingcircumstances:(bo) Selected Customers of the Principal or a Philips AssociatedCompany or of another distributor which are specificallymentioned in Annex A (which Principal shall
    The Distributor shall refrain from activelyselling or assisting in selling the Products to the SelectedCustomers mentioned in Annex A."
    No. 2353 K/Pdt/201014.15:Disebutkan dengan tegas dalam Pasal 6.1 Distribution AgreementNo. 031/Leg/C/II/05 (Vide Bukti T 3)"(a) The Distributor shall use its best efforts to generate maximumexposure and high profile publicity of the Products in theTerritory to achieve awareness of the Products within theTerritory, subject always to full compliance with the instructionsand directions of the Principal for any publicity campaignundertaken by the Distributor.(6) = The Distributor shall at all times diligently
Putus : 11-10-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1633/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 11 Oktober 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. YAMAHA MUSIC MANUFACTURING INDONESIA
5433 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In consideration of the technical and other assistance givenby YAMAHA to YMMI hereunder YMMI shall pay to YAMAHAthe royalty as specified below for the term of this Agreementand even after the expiration there of in case YAMAHAgrants YMMI the right to sell Guitars and Drums in promotionto total amount of Guitars and Drums that YMMI sold to itsbuyers including YAMAHA 2.0% (include tax) of the net salesof Guitars and Drums;2.
    Term of Agreement;Article24This Agreement shall continue in full force for five (5) years from 1April, 2004. Thereafter, it shall be automatically extended for oneyear each, unless either party shall give to the other party awritten notice of its intention to terminate this Agreement within atleast three (3) monthprior to the expiration of the term of thisAgreement;e.
Putus : 06-12-2019 — Upload : 20-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4235/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 6 Desember 2019 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
4115 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Theconstituent material of the outer sole for purposes of classification shall be taken to be thematerial having the greatest surface area in contact with the ground. In determining theconstituent material of the outer sole, no account should be taken of attached accessories orreinforcements which partly cover the sole (see Note 4 (b) to this Chapter).
    In such cases, the ui per shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Register : 26-04-2019 — Putus : 11-09-2019 — Upload : 25-09-2019
Putusan PA TANJUNG BALAI KARIMUN Nomor 0183/Pdt.G/2019/PA.TBK
Tanggal 11 September 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
446
  • No. 00183 /Pdt.G/2019 /PA.TBKkeberadaannya untuk berkomunikasi dan mengasuh anakanaknya dalamrangka mengedepankan prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak (the bestinterests of the child shall be a primary consideration);Menimbang, bahwa sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 89 ayat (1)UndangUndang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agamasebagaimana diubah dengan UndangUndang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 danPerubahan Kedua dengan UndangUndang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009, makaseluruh biaya yang timbul dalam perkara ini dibebankan
Register : 11-02-2019 — Putus : 25-04-2019 — Upload : 09-12-2019
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 73/PDT/2019/PT BDG
Tanggal 25 April 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : Hilton Hotel Bandung
Terbanding/Penggugat : Ivan Chrisna
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : Wedding Organizer Testimo
219163
  • Sebab segalaperselisihan yang timbul dari Conference & Event Agreement NoContract WRIGA 100318 tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017 (selanjutnyadisebut SURAT PERJANJIAN) di selesaikan melalui Arbitrase dan dalamhal ini yang berwenang adalah Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesiacabang Bandung sebagaimana Pasal 20 ayat 2 Surat Perjanjian yangmenyatakan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration
    of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui arbitrase sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi.Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana telahditandatangani langsung baik oleh Penggugat maupun Tergugat ,jikalaupun Pasal 20 ayat 2
    Bahwa Majelis Hakim PN Bandung secara nyata telah melampauikewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara aquo.Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 20 ayat (2) PerjanjianConference and Event Agreement No Contract: WRIGA 100318tertanggal 1 Oktober 2017, menyebutkan:Arbitration of disputes arising out of or in connection with thisagreement shall be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotellocated under the Rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement wil
    be resolved in the jurisdiction ini which the hotel islocated under the rules of arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotelis located.Bahwa apabila Pembanding/ semula Penggugat Rekonpensimengajukan Gugatan Wanprestasi yang merupakan Gugatanperselisihan yang timbul akibat dari pelaksanaan suatu perjanjian,maka seharusnya dilakukan secara terpisah dengan perkara ini dantidak
    be resolved in the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated under the rules of Arbitration of the arbitration shall beconducted in English and this agreement will governed by andinterpreted pursuant to the law of the jurisdiction in which the hotel islocated.yang pada intinya perjanjian menyatakan Segala perselisihan yangtimbul dari perjanjian ini diselesaikan melalui ARBITRASE sertamenggunakan hukum di daerah hukumnya meliputi hotel berlokasi ;Bahwa dalam pasal tersebut jelas berlaku yang mana
Putus : 25-03-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 776 /B/PK/PJK/2012
Tanggal 25 Maret 2013 — PT. Billabong Indonesia vs Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai
7375 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 776/B/PK/PJK/2012Paragraph 365: "Payments made by the buyer for the right to distribute or resellthe imported goods shall not be added to the price actually paid or payable forthe imported goods if such payments are not a condition of the sale for export tothe country of importation of the imported goods";Terjemahan : "Pembayaran yang dilakukan pembeli atas hak untukmendistribusikan atau menjual kembali barang impor tidak ditambahkan padaharga yang sebenarnya dibayar atau terhutang
    Oleh karena itu, royalti tidak perlu ditambahkan pada hargayang sebenarnya dibayar atau seharusnya dibayar sebagaimana yangdimaksud pada Article 8.1 (c) ";Commentary on the GATT Customs Valuation Code, Paragraph 365 :"Payments made by the buyer for the right to distribute or resell the importedgoods shall not be added to the price actually paid or payable for the importedgoods if such payments are not a condition of the sale for export to the countryof importation of the imported goods ";Terjemahan
    However, the charges for the right to reproducethe imported goods in the country of importation shall not be added tothe price actually paid or payable for the imported goods in determiningthe customs value;Payments made by the buyer for the right to distribute or resell theimported goods shall not be added to the price actually paid or payablefor the imported goods if such payments are not a condition of the salefor export to the country of importation of the imported goods;Adapun terjemahannya
    Sherman, Heinrich Glashoff, ICC PublishingKluwerTaxation Publishers, 1988; "Commentary") (terlampir sebagai BuktiPemohon 9) yang dikutip oleh Majelis Pengadilan Pajak berbunyi sebagaiberikut:ee) Distribution rightsThe Notes (N 87) also slate dial thatPayments made by lite buyer for the right to distribute or resell liemportcd goods shall not be added to the price aciually paid or payable forthe imported goods if such payments are nol a condition of the sale forexport to lie country of importation
    pembayaranpembayaran royalti kepada Pemberi lisensi X;Ketentuan terkait dari perundangundangan di Kanada, dalam hal ini,bagian 48 dari Undangundang Bea Cukai, sebagaimana dikutip dibawahini, dan sangat mengikuti Pasal 8 (1) (c) dari Customs Valuation Code:"48(1) Subject to subsection (6), the value for duty of goods sold is thetransaction value of the goods if the goods are sold for export to Canadaand the price paid or payable for the goods can be determined...(4) The transaction value of goods shall
Putus : 23-02-2010 — Upload : 03-12-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 74 B/PK/PJK/2004
Tanggal 23 Februari 2010 — BUT MAGMA NUSANTARA LIMITED, ; DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
6128 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In the case of any such requirement,CONTRACTOR shall pay the required amount when due, andPERTAMINA shall use best efforts to cause theGoverment to reimbuse CONTRACTOR for such paymentpursuant to Decision No. 766, within three Months of suchpayments.
    Value added tax on goods and services obtained withinIndonesia shall be deferred during the preproduction period,and all value added taz incurred by Contractor (eithercurrently due or deferred under Decision No. 766) shall bereimbursed by the Government pursuant to Decree No. 49and Decision No. 766.
    No. 74 B/PK/PJK/200440mencantumkan peraturanperaturan yang menjadi dasarpenundaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai, sebagai berikut:..Value added tax on goods and services obtained withinIndonesia shall be deferred during the preproduction period,and all value added tax incurred by Contractor (eithercurrently due or deferred under Decision No. 766) shall bereimbursed by the Goverment pursuant to Decree No. 49 andDecision No. 766.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1876 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT TANJUNGENIM LESTARI PULP AND PAPER
24865 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ICTA, menginformasikan pihak lainnya apabila telah terjadi ciderajanji oleh salah satu pihak, memberikan instruksi, mengambil tindakan, dan jugamenentukan kebijakan apabila diperlukan;Bahwa lebih lanjut, Surat Keterangan Domisili (SKD) Nordea Bank AB (publ)telah Pemohon Banding sampaikan pada saat proses pemeriksaan;Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 7 ayat (1) Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda(Tax Treaty) antara Indonesia dan Swedia, diatur bahwa:"The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting State shall
    thatState unless the enterprise carries on business in the other Contracting Statethrough a permanent establishment situated therein";Pasal 11 ayat (1)"Interest arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the otherContracting State may be taxed in that other State";Pasal 11 ayat (2)"However, such interest may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which itarises, and according to the laws of that State, but if the recipient is thebeneficial owner of the interest the tax so charged shall
    The competent authorities of the ContractingStates shall by mutual agreement settle the mode of application of thislimitation";Pasal 11 ayat (5)"The term "interest" as used in this Article means income from debtclaims ofevery kind, whether or not secured by mortgage, and whether or not carrying aright to participate in the debtor's profits, and in particular, income fromgovernment securities and income from bonds or debentures, includingpremiums and prizes attaching to such securities, bonds or debentures
    sebagainya; Selisin kurs atas pinjaman dalam valuta asing (sepanjang selisin kurstersebut merupakan penyesuaian terhadap biaya bunga) atau amortisasipremi kontrak valuta berjangka dalam rangka lindung nilai (hedging) danayang dipinjam dalam valuta asing;Bahwa berdasarkan penjelasan tersebut diatas, PSAK Nomor 26 dengan jelasmembedakan biaya bunga dan biaya lainnya;Bahwa lebih lanjut, dalam perjanjian ICTA disebutkan juga bahwa:Halaman 10 dari 42 halaman Putusan Nomor 1876/B/PK/PJK/2017"interest shall
    Pemohon Banding berdasarkan fee /etter yangmerupakan penetapan biaya atas jasajasa yang diberikan olehHalaman 15 dari 42 halaman Putusan Nomor 1876/B/PK/PJK/2017Technical Committee, Insurance Coordinator, Intercreditor Agent,Facility Agents, Security Agent, Trustee dan Account Banks yangbertindak dalam kapasitasnya yang hak dan kewajiban masingmasing penerima penghasilan diatur dalam Bagian 13 mengenaiKetentuan Agen Umum dan Rekening Bank ICTA Terjemahan, yangjuga telah menentukan bahwa "interest shall
Register : 02-06-2017 — Putus : 19-07-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1218 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 19 Juli 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs BUT BANGKOK BANK PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED;
134109 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pemohon Banding tidak setuju dengan pendapat Peneliti yangmenyatakan bahwa alasan Pemohon Banding tidak tepat dan tidak relevankarena seharusnya yang relevan untuk dilihat adalah ketentuan yangmerujuk pada hak pemajakan Negara cumber sesuai "article 11 angka 2huruf a P3B yaitu sebagai berikut :However, In the case of Indonesia, such interest arising in Indonesia maybe taxed in Indonesia according to the laws of Indonesia, but if the recipientis the beneficial owner of the interest, the tax so charged shall
    (Terbanding)berpendapat bahwa alasan Termohon Peninjauan Kembali(Pemohon Banding) tersebut tidak tepat dan tidak relevan karenaseharusnya yang relevan untuk dilihat adalah ketentuan yangmerujuk pada hak pemajakan Negara sumber sesuai "article 11angka 2 huruf a" P3B yaitu sebagai berikut:"However, In the case of Indonesia, such interest arising inIndonesia may be taxed in Indonesia according to the laws ofIndonesia, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the interest,the tax so charged shall
    Bahwa sesuai dengan Pasal 11 ayat 2 huruf a P3B Indonesia Thailand yang menyatakan bahwa "However, In the case ofIndonesia, such interest arising in Indonesia may be taxed inIndonesia according to the laws of Indonesia, but if theHalaman 15 dari 26 halaman Putusan Nomor 1218/B/PK/PJK/2017recipient is the beneficial owner of the interest, the tax socharged shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross amount ofthe interest, hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa dalam hal diIndonesia, bunga yang berasal dari Indonesia
    Bahwa dengan demikian argumentasi Termohon PeninjauanKembali (semula Pemohon Banding) sebagaimana tersebut diatas tidak tepat dan tidak relevan karena seharusnya yangrelevan untuk dilihat adalah ketentuan yang merujuk pada hakpemajakan Negara sumber yaitu sebagai berikut:"However,(a) In the case of Indonesia,such interest arising in Indonesia may be taxed in Indonesiaaccording to the laws of Indonesia, but if the recipient is thebeneficial owner of the interest, the tax so charged shall notexceed
Putus : 27-09-2017 — Upload : 16-10-2017
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI.Design Industri/2017/PN Niaga.Sby
Tanggal 27 September 2017 — Dart Industries, Inc melawan PT Mitra Mulia Makmur Cs
376126
  • Members shall provide for the protection of independently createdindustrial designs that are new or original. Members may provide thatdesigns are not new or original if they do not significantly differ fromknown designs or combinations of known design features. Membersmay provide that such protection shall not extend to designs dictatedessentially by technical or functional considerations."Terjemahan bebasnya:"Anggota vajib memberikan perlindungan desain produk industri yangbaru atau asli.
    Members shall provide for the protection of independently createdindustrial designs that are new or original. Members may provide thatdesigns are not newor original if they do not significantly differ from knowndesigns or combinations of known design features.
    give effect to the provisions of this Agreement.Members may, but shall not obliged to, implement in their law moreextensive protection than is required by this Agreement, providedthat such protection does not contravene the provisions of thisAgreement.
    Members shall be free to determine the appropriatemethod of implementing the provisions of this agreement withintheir own legal system and practice.Terjemahan bebasnya:Negara anggota akan menindaklanjuti ketentuanketentuan padaPerjanjian ini.
    Members mayprovide that such protection shall not extend to designs dictatedessentially by technical or functional considerations.Terjemahan bebasnya:Negara anggota harus memberikan perlindungan desain industri yangbaru atau asli. Negara anggota dapat menetapkan bahwa desain tidak baruatau asli jika mereka tidak secara signifikan berbeda dari desain yangsudah ada atau kombinasi dari fitur desain yang sudah ada.
Register : 16-07-2013 — Putus : 09-09-2014 — Upload : 03-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.54991/PP/M.IXA/19/2014
Tanggal 9 September 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
20012
  • And The Peoples Republic OfChina, dalam melaksanakan kerjasama ACFTA dimaksud disepakati untuk menggunakan Rule of Origin(ROO) Form E atau Surat Keterangan Asal Barang Form E, yang diatur secara rinci dalam RevisedOperational Certification Procedures (OCP) For The Rules Of Origin Of The AseanChina Free Trade Area;bahwa berdasarkan Appendix 1: Revised Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) For The Rules Of OriginOf The AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 7 dinyatakan The Issuing Authorities shall
    Certificate of Origin (Form E), and signed by theauthorised signatory;b) The origin of the product is in conformity with the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA;c) The other statements of the Certificate of Origin (Form E) correspond to supporting documentaryevidence submitted ;d) Description, quantity and weight of products, marks and number of packages, number and kinds ofpackages, as specified, conform to the products to be exported;e) Multiple items declared on the same Certificate of Origin (Form E) shall
    be allowed subject to thedomestic laws, regulations and administrative rules of the importing Party provided each item mustqualify separately in its own right;bahwa berdasarkan Annex 3: Operational Certification Procedures (OCP) For The Rules Of Origin OfThe AseanChina Free Trade Area pada Rule 3 dinyatakan Within the meaning of Rule 2 (a), thefollowing shall be considered as wholly produced or obtained in a Party:a) Plant and plant products harvested, picked or gathered there;b) Live animals 2
Register : 09-02-2016 — Putus : 14-04-2016 — Upload : 14-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 134 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 14 April 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SURYA MULTI INDOPACK;
9649 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Republic OfSingapore For The Avoidance Of Double Taxation And The Prevention OfFiscal Evasion With Respect To Taxes On IncomeArticle 12 paragraph (1)Royalties arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the otherContracting State may be taxed in that other State.Article 12 paragraph (2)However, such royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in whichthey arise, and according to the law of the State, but if the recipient is thebeneficial owner of the royalties, the tax so charged shall
    equipment, or forinformation concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience.Article 12 paragraph (8)Where, owing to a special relationship betwen the payer and the beneficialowner or between both of them and some other person, the amount of theroyalties paid, having regard to the use, right or information for which theyare paid, exceeds the amount which would have been agreed upon by thepayer and the beneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, theprovisions of this article shall
    Inthat case, the excess part of the payments shall remain taxable accordingto the laws of each Contracting State, due regard being had to the otherprovisions of this Agreement..
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 27-10-2016 — Upload : 29-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1097 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 27 Oktober 2016 — PT. JELAI CAHAYA MINERALS VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
104100 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Interest Rate" means LIBOR#5% on 12 months deposit as at the due dateof the Advance;("Tingkat Bunga" berarti LIBOR+5% atas setoran 12 bulan pada saat jatuhtempo Pinjaman);Butir 4.1.Interest shall notionally accrue on the outstanding principal from time to timeat the Interest Rate, provided that Interest shall not become due nor payableunless and until specifically demanded in writing by the Lender;(Bunga dibayangkan terakumulasi atas pokok pinjaman yang belum dibayarden' waktu ke waktu pada Tingkat
    Tanggal jatuh tempo (Due Date) itu sendiridiatur dalam Butir 4.2 Perjanjian Pinjaman yang berbunyi:The Lender shall, from time to time, determine the due date for repayment ofeach Advance and the Borrower shall repay the Advance accordingly;Halaman 2 dari 27 halaman.
Register : 05-11-2018 — Putus : 06-12-2018 — Upload : 31-12-2018
Putusan PA BUOL Nomor 153/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Buol
Tanggal 6 Desember 2018 — PENGGUGAT Melawan TERGUGAT
4616
  • Dalil syar'i dalam Kitab Madaa Hurriyatuz Zaujaini fith Thalaaq Juz halaman 83, yang kemudian diambil alin sebagai pendapat majelis hakimsebagai berikut:Lgad bis tea aly Gem g Sl) Shall qo ewei Gum (GUal) pli plays JUGS) hyOF C90 Oe Boge Tig Ab Qual Cuny che Vy GibaiTig OLS alle fap g srgall Garulls Gums jl dal ple aSay OI cline yf piu4d) set)Artinya : Islam memilih lembaga thalaq/cerai ketika rumah tanggasudah dianggap goncang serta dianggap sudah tidak bermanfaat laginasehat/perdamaian, dan hubungan
Register : 15-07-2020 — Putus : 07-01-2021 — Upload : 12-01-2021
Putusan PTUN JAKARTA Nomor 136/G/2020/PTUN.JKT
Tanggal 7 Januari 2021 — Penggugat:
Prof.Dr. O.C. KALIGIS, SH.,MH.
Tergugat:
Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi KPK RI
480334
  • Dan Pasal 28 D ayat (1) Setiap orang berhak ataspengakuan, jaminan, perlindungan, dan kepastian hukum yangadil serta perlakuan yang sama dihadapan hukum;UU No. 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan InternationalConvenant on Civil and Political Right (ICCPR) Pasal 10 ayat (3)dan Pasal 26 yang berbunyi:Pasal 10 ayat (3), The penintentiary system shall comprisetreatment of prisioners the essential aim of which shall be theirreformation and social rehabilitation.
    In this respect, the law shall prohibitany discrimination and guarantee to allpersons equal andeffective protection against discrimination on any ground such asrace, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,national or social origin, property, birth or other status;The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Treatment ofPrisioners (The Nelson Mandela Rule,) . Rule of GeneralApplication, Pasal 2 berbunyi:Rule 2. 1. The present rules shall be applied impartially.
    The religious beliefs andmoral precepts of prisoners shall be respected. 2. In order for theprinciple of nondiscrimination to beput into practice, prisonadministrations shall take account of the individual needs ofprisoners, in particular the most vulnerable categories in prisonsettings. Measures to protect and promote the rights of prisonersHalaman 18 dari 88 halaman, Putusan Nomor 136/G/2020/PTUNJKTwith special needs are required and shall not be regarded asdiscriminatory;c.
    Pasal 28 D ayat1: Setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan, perlindungan dankepastian hukum yang adil serta perlakuan yang sama dihadapan hukum.UndangUndang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan InternationalConvenant Civil and Political Right (ICCPR) Pasal 10 ayat 3 dan Pasal 26.Pasal 10 ayat 3: The penintentiary sytem shall comprise treatment ofprisoners the essential aim of which shall be their reformation and socialrehabilitation.
    Rule 2.1 The present rule shall be applied impartially.Their shall be no discrimination on the ground of race, colour, sex, language,political or orther opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or anyother status.
Register : 18-01-2011 — Putus : 17-11-2011 — Upload : 14-04-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 30/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 17 Nopember 2011 — AGUS ERMAWAN M E L A W A N BRIAN LEE SKINNER PT.MATCH CONSULTING INYERNATIONAL
9042
  • pengadilan Negri Jakarta Selatan.3 Bahwa selain itu TERGUGAT II Juga berkedudukan dijakarta selatan,dalamlingkup kewenangan Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan.Pasal 118 ayat 4 HIR:Sika dengan surat akte tempat telah di pilih,maka si penggugat kalau mau dapatmemasukan gugatannya kepada ketua pengadilan negri yang dalam daerahhukumnya tempat diam yang dipilih itu terletak.Article 14.3 COOPERATION AGREEMENT:in case of faliure to attain amicable resolition, then all disputes arising in relation tothis agreement shall
    Dengan demikian sebagai perseroan terbatas yang tunduk padaketentuan UndangUndang No.40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (videpasal 66 ayat 3 UU PT) dan ketentuan hukum perusahaan yangberlaku,TERGUGAT II, wajib membuat laporan keuangan,sehingga keluarmasuknya keuangan dari rekening TERGUGAT II, termasuk sehubungan denganbisnis pelatihan berdasarkan AGREEMENT transparan dan dapat di pertanggungjawabkan.Article 2.3 COOPERATION AGREEMENT:ALL payments shall be made to the account in favour of the
    Second Party toMatch Consulting International with bank BCA Account No.0063103606.Terjemahan resminya:Pasal 2 ayat AGREEMENT:Semua pembayaran harus di lakukan atas nama pihak ke dua Kepada Matchconsulting International di rekening BCA Account No.0063103606.Article 2.3 cooperation AGREEMENT :ALL payments shall be made to the account in favor of the Second Party toMatch Consulting international with Bank BCA Account No.0063103606.Article 7.3 COOPERATION AGREEMENT :Every revenue or invoic relating
    to this cooperation scope shall be directelicreditted to the account of match Consulting International with bank BCA No:0063103606 and every payment shall also be talken from such account.
    sebagai modal kewajibansebesar Rp.500.000.000, (limaratus juta rupiah) ke Rekeninng TERGUGAT II diBank Central Asia (BCA) dengan nomor 0063013606 dan baik TERGUGAT Imaupun TERGUGAT II tudak pernah mau di konfirmasi mengenai hal itu(vide Bukti P1).Articel 2.1 COOPERATION AGREEMENT.For the training division activities as referred to in Article 1, the partieshereto agre to equally (50:50) assume the capital required namely amountingto Rp. 1.000.000.000, (one billion rupiah),of wich another acounting shall
Putus : 25-05-2012 — Upload : 13-11-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 268 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 25 Mei 2012 — PT. SUMI ASIH ; VINMAR OVERSEAS Ltd
787859 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Within thirty (30) days from the date of transmittal of thisAward to the Parties, Respondent Pt Sumi AsihOleochemical Industry shall pay to Claimant VinmarOverseas,Ltd. the following sums :a. Damages of $5,578,461.00 ;b. Preaward interest in the amount of $355,339.00 ;c. Attorneys fees of $200,000.00 ;3. Interest on the total of the amounts specified in paragraph 1above shall accrue until paid at the rate applicable to unpaidjudgements as provided under the law of the States ofTexas;4.
    The administrative fees and expenses of the InternationalCentre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the internationaldivision of the American Arbitration Association (AAA),totaling $22,550.00 shall be borne by the Parties as incurred ;5. The compensation and expenses of arbitrators totaling$54,582.11 shall be borne equally by the Parties......... 7:3.
    nasional dan bukan PutusanArbitrase Internasional ;Menimbang bahwa terhadap dalil Penggugat yang dibantahTergugat tersebut majelis berpendapat bahwa berdasarkan BuktiT115, berupa Penetapan Penjadwalan (Scheduling Order)tanggal 30 Juli 2008 didalamnya telah termuat klausula bahvwakedua belah pihak yang bersengketa telah menyetujui bahwabentuk putusan arbitrase berbentuk putusan standard, yaitu tidaklagi memuat pertimbangan hukum dan duduk perkaranya,sebagaimana tertulis dalam bukti 1115 :The Ruling shall
    No. 268 K/Pdt.Sus/2012ADAMS AND REESE LLP sebagaimana didalilkan olehPenggugat ;Keberatan Pembanding: 19.20.21.Bahwa pengertian putusan standar sebagaimana disebutkan dalamScheduling Order yakni The ruling shall be a standard award andnot a reasoned avard tidaklah jelas karena Peraturan AAA sendiriyakni INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDUREStidak menyebutkan istilah dan pengertian Putusan Standar atau AStandard Award dan Peraturan AAA juga tidak menetapkan bentukataupun format suatu Putusan
Register : 10-08-2020 — Putus : 16-10-2020 — Upload : 27-10-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 494/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 16 Oktober 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT.Spie Oil dan Gas Services Indonesia Diwakili Oleh : PT.Spie Oil dan Gas Services Indonesia
Terbanding/Tergugat : SAMIR ABBES
265307
  • TRAVELLING & MOBILISATION EXPENSES :6.1 Subject to the Employee's status of assignment as stated in theContract of Employment (hereinafter referred to as "the Status ofAssignment"), the Company shall at the beginning and end of theEmployee's engagement hereunder, and for the approved homeleave, pay the travel cost for the Employee, and his/her authorizeddependents (as herein defined) if the Employee is Resident withhis/her family. ... ;6.2 For purposes of this Article 7, the Employee's "authorizeddependents
    " shall mean one spouse per Employee and theEmployee's legally dependent children if they are living with theEmployee in the country where he is assigned;Gi8 cms6.4 All travelling costs and accommodation expenses Incurred bythe Employee on the Company's or Client's authorized missionshall be reimbursed according to the rate as may be determined bythe Company or Client upon submission of the correspondingexpenses report duly approved by the Company or Client andsupported with original receipts;6.5
    PROVISION OF ACCOMMODATION, VEHICLE &EQUIPMENT;7.1 Accommodation: company furnished house or serviceapartment with utilities;7.2 All costs and charges relating to normal repair and maintenanceand Insurance of the accommodation, furniture and equipmentprovided to the Employee shall be borne and paid by the Company,as well as the charges relating to a reasonable usage of water andelectricity.
    All personal phone calls shall be at the Employee'sexpense and in the event the Employee shall fail to pay for suchpersonal phone calls, the Company shall be entitled to deduct thecost from the Employee's Remuneration;FD sows7.4...Fic wanHalaman 17 dari 45 halaman Putusan Nomor 494/PDT/2020/PT DKIFeO womTerjemahan bebasnya adalah sebagai berikut:6.
Putus : 22-04-2014 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 158 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014
Tanggal 22 April 2014 — PT. JAYA LESTARI VS PT BANK RABOBANK INTERNATIONAL INDONESIA
299222 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Maximum tenor:up to 1 (one) month ;The aggregate outstanding amount of the Facilities under thisAgreement together wth the foreign exchange facilityprovided by the Lender to the Borrower under offer letter No.LA/CA/1280/2006 dated 8 June 2006, with all itsamendments, shall not exceed the maximum amount of US$3,000,000 (United States Dollars Three Million) at any point oftime."
    in its absolute discretion toterminate the Facilities and/or request repayment ondemand without any obligation to give the reasonsthereof and the Borrower shall wthin 5 (five)Business Days after receipt of such demand repaythe entire amount of the Facilities together wth allinterests, costs and expenses due and payable bythe Borrower to the Lender under this Agreement ;6.3 The Borrower may prepay the whole or any part ofthe principal amount or integral multiple ofUS$50,000.
    (United States Dollars fifty thousand) orany other amounts as may be agreed by the Lenderby giving a 3 (three) Business Days prior wittennotice to the Lender to that effect, provided alwaysthat such prepayment must be made on InterestPayment Date and must be accompanied by accruedinterest on the amount prepaid and prepayment feeas the Lender may determine at its sole discretion ;6.4 Any prepayment notice given by the Borrowerpursuant to Article 6.3 shall be irrevocable, shallspecify the date upon
    EVENTS OF DEFAULT;The Lender may, wthout prejudice to its other rights hereunder,terminate its obligation to make the Facilities availablewhereupon the shall be reduced to zero and declare all principalamounts outstanding under the Facilities, together wth allaccrued interest and other moneys payable hereunder,immediately due and payable, whereupon the same shall eitherimmediately or in accordance wth such declaration becomerepayable, if any of the followng events (each being separatelydefined as
    an "Event of Default") shall occur ;a. any amount due to the Lender hereunder or under anySecurity Documents is not paid wthin 5 (five) BusinessDays after the due date for payment, in the currency and inthe manner specified herein or therein; or."