Ditemukan 1056 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Register : 04-08-2016 — Putus : 30-08-2016 — Upload : 30-08-2016
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0264/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Rtu Tanggal 30 Agustus 2016 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
11 — 2
11 — 2
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam: A Comparative View, ITU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation hasnot been allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitationof the right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 01-09-2016 — Putus : 13-10-2016 — Upload : 17-10-2016
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0296/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Rtu Tanggal 13 Oktober 2016 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
10 — 2
10 — 2
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam :A Comparative View, IIU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman 126 :If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has notbeen allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation of theright of free choice and society would have been deprived of happytemarried state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 11-09-2020 — Putus : 12-10-2020 — Upload : 26-10-2020
Putusan PT PADANG Nomor 213/PID.SUS/2020/PT PDG Tanggal 12 Oktober 2020 — Pembanding/Penuntut Umum : YENI FAJRIA, SH
Terbanding/Terdakwa : ARI JUNAIDI panggilan ARI alias ERIK
57 — 36
Terbanding/Terdakwa : ARI JUNAIDI panggilan ARI alias ERIK
57 — 36
Ari alias Erik telah terbukti secara sah danmeyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana Tanpa hak menguasalnarkotika golongan bukan tanaman", oleh karena itu. pertimbangan hukumMajelis Hakim Tingkat Pertama tersebut diambil alin dan dijadikanpertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim Tingkat Banding dalam memutusperkara ini ditingkat banding;Menimbang, bahwa setelah Majelis Hakim Tingkat Bandingmempertimbangkan aspek /egal justice, moral justice dan social justice sertaa sense of justice in society, menurut
Register : 13-10-2021 — Putus : 01-12-2021 — Upload : 01-12-2021
Putusan PT BANJARMASIN Nomor 196/PID/2021/PT BJM Tanggal 1 Desember 2021 — Pembanding/Penuntut Umum II : Wiradhyaksa Mochamad Hariadi Putra, SH
Terbanding/Terdakwa : Maulid Akbar Bin H. Syahdian Murad, SH
173 — 92
Terbanding/Terdakwa : Maulid Akbar Bin H. Syahdian Murad, SH
173 — 92
Oleh karena itu, kami sangat sependapat dengan apayang pernah dikemukakan oleh Satjipto Rahardjo (dalam artikel "BetweenTwo Worlds: Modern State and Traditional Society in Indonesia, dimuat diJurnal Law and Society Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, 1994) :"Kerinduan akan suatu teori Indonesia yang berbeda, menjangkiti Komunitasakademik, sebuah teori dengan konstruksikonstruksi hukum yangdikembangkan secara lebih terstruktur, terinci, dan sistematik yang akanmemberikan arah kepada pembangunan nasional, yang
Register : 13-04-2017 — Putus : 09-05-2017 — Upload : 12-05-2017
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0152/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Rtu Tanggal 9 Mei 2017 — Penggugatb vs Tergugat
13 — 2
13 — 2
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam :A Comparative View, IIU law Journal, Vol , No 1, 1989, halaman 126 :ff on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has notbeen allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation of theright of free choice and society would have been deprived of happyttmarried state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Putus : 08-07-2002 — Upload : 06-01-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4K/N/HAKI/2002 TAHUN 2002 Tanggal 8 Juli 2002 — Berger-Seidle GMBH
168 — 75 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
168 — 75 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek; Bahwa oleh karena merek "BERGERSEIDLE" Nomor 377146 atas nama Tergugatdidaftarkan tidak sesuai dengan ketentuanketentuan yang terdapat dalam Undang UndangMerek sebagaimana dijelaskan diatas, maka sudah sepantasnya pendaftaran merek milikTergugat tersebut dibatalkan; Bahwa tindakan Tergugat yang mendaftarkan merek "BERGERSEIDLE" dapatdikualifikasikan sebagai persaingan curang (unfair competition) dalam segala bent uk danmenyesatkan anggota masyarakat (misleading society
Register : 08-04-2010 — Putus : 26-05-2010 — Upload : 11-12-2011
Putusan PA MOJOKERTO Nomor 660/Pdt.G/2010/PA.Mr Tanggal 26 Mei 2010 — PENGGUGAT DAN TERGUGAT
7 — 0
7 — 0
I, No. 1, 1989, halaman17If on the object of the marriage being defeated,separation has not been allowed to the parties, thiswould has been a cruel limitation of the right offree choice and society would have been deprived o fa happy married state of life(Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai, perceraiantidak diijinkan bagi = para pihak, hal ini bisamerupakan ketentuan yang kejam terhadap hak kebebasanmenentukan pilihan dan bisa membuat masyarakatkehilangan harapan untuk mencapai perkawinan yangbahagia
Register : 30-07-2019 — Putus : 30-09-2019 — Upload : 01-10-2019
Putusan PTTUN JAKARTA Nomor 231/B/2019/PT.TUN.JKT Tanggal 30 September 2019 — Pembanding/ Intervensi I : GUBERNUR PROVINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT BUANA PERMATA HIJAU. Diwakili oleh Hendro Sumampow
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Kepala Kantor Pertanahan Kota Administrasi Jakarta Utara
Terbanding/Tergugat II : GUBERNUR PROVINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBU KOTA JAKARTA
116 — 65
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT BUANA PERMATA HIJAU. Diwakili oleh Hendro Sumampow
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Kepala Kantor Pertanahan Kota Administrasi Jakarta Utara
Terbanding/Tergugat II : GUBERNUR PROVINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBU KOTA JAKARTA
116 — 65
Muhtadin, S.H 222222 2n nnn n nnnSemuanya Advokat dan Konsultan hukum yang memilin domisilihukum di kantor Indrayana Centre for Government and Society(INTERGRITY), berkedudukan di Cityloft Sudirman lantai 12 ", suite1226, jalan KH. Mas Mansyur 121 Jakarta 10250, berdasarkan suratkuasa khusus Nomor 556/1.875.1 tanggal 26 Juni 2019, selanjutnyadisebut sebagai TERGUGAT II INTERVENSI/PEMBANDING:2.
Register : 20-02-2019 — Putus : 19-03-2019 — Upload : 19-03-2019
Putusan PA NEGARA BANJARMASIN Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Negr Tanggal 19 Maret 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
15 — 8
15 — 8
Jaffer Hussain MarriageBreakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam : AComparative View, IIU law Journal, Vol 1, No 1, 1989, halaman 126 :If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has notbeen allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation ofthe right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagaldicapai, perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, halini merupakan ketentuan
Register : 01-08-2016 — Putus : 25-08-2016 — Upload : 26-08-2016
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0251/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Rtu Tanggal 25 Agustus 2016 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
12 — 4
12 — 4
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam: A Comparative View, ITU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation hasnot been allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitationof the right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 20-02-2012 — Putus : 17-10-2012 — Upload : 18-12-2012
Putusan PA JEMBER Nomor 956/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Jr Tanggal 17 Oktober 2012 — PENGGUGAT DAN TERGUGAT
8 — 0
8 — 0
I, No. 1, 1989,halaman 126;Tf on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has not beenallowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation of the right of freechoice and society would have been deprived o f a happy married state of life;(Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai, perceraian tidak diijinkan bagipara pihak, hal ini bisa merupakan ketentuan yang kejam terhadap hakkebebasan menentukan pilihan dan bisa membuat masyarakat kehilanganharapan untuk mencapai perkawinan
Register : 11-11-2016 — Putus : 22-12-2016 — Upload : 28-12-2016
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0382/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Rtu Tanggal 22 Desember 2016 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
42 — 3
42 — 3
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam: A Comparative View, ITU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation hasnot been allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitationof the right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 18-07-2016 — Putus : 06-09-2016 — Upload : 09-09-2016
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0235/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Rtu Tanggal 6 September 2016 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
10 — 2
10 — 2
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam: A Comparative View, ITU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation hasnot been allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitationof the right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 02-01-2012 — Putus : 13-03-2012 — Upload : 08-10-2012
Putusan PA BANYUWANGI Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Bwi Tanggal 13 Maret 2012 — PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT
12 — 2
12 — 2
I, No. 1, 1989, halaman 126) ; Tf on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has not been allowed to the parties,this would has been a cruel limitation of the right of free choice and society would have beendeprived o fa happy married state of life( Apabila tujuwan perkawinan gagal dicapai, perceraian tidak diyinkan bagi para pihak, hal inibisa merupakan ketentuan yang kejam terhadap hak kebebasan menentukan pilihan dan bisamembuat masyarakat kehilangan harapan untuk mencapai perkawinan
Register : 05-08-2019 — Putus : 20-08-2019 — Upload : 20-08-2019
Putusan PA NEGARA BANJARMASIN Nomor 101/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Negr Tanggal 20 Agustus 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
34 — 2
34 — 2
Jaffer Hussain MarriageBreakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam : AComparative View, IIU law Journal, Vol 1, No 1, 1989, halaman 126 :If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has notbeen allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation ofthe right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagalHal. 13 dari 18 Putusan Nomor 101/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Negr.dicapai, perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan
Register : 14-07-2016 — Putus : 08-09-2016 — Upload : 09-09-2016
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0234/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Rtu Tanggal 8 September 2016 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
15 — 3
15 — 3
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam: A Comparative View, ITU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation hasnot been allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitationof the right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofhappy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 16-11-2015 — Putus : 07-03-2016 — Upload : 11-07-2019
Putusan PA BANYUMAS Nomor 1754/Pdt.G/2015/PA.Bms Tanggal 7 Maret 2016 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
16 — 4
16 — 4
I No.1,1989, halaman 126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has notbeen allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitationof the right of free choice and society would have been deprived ofa happy married state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai, perceraian tidakdiijinkan bagi para pihak, hal ini bisa merupakan ketentuan yangkejam terhadap hak kebebasan menentukan pilihan dan bisa membuatmasyarakat kehilangan harapan untuk mencapai' perkawinan
Register : 04-03-2019 — Putus : 27-06-2019 — Upload : 28-06-2019
Putusan PA CIAMIS Nomor 1149/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Cms Tanggal 27 Juni 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
10 — 1
10 — 1
No.1, 1989, halaman 126 :If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has not beenallowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation of the right of freechoice and society would have been deprived of a happy married state of life(Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai, perceraian tidak diijinkan bagi parapihak, hal ini bisa merupakan ketentuan yang kejam terhadap hak kebebasanmenentukan pilihan dan bisa membuat masyarakat kehilangan harapan untukmencapai perkawinan yang
Register : 01-02-2017 — Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 22-02-2017
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0055/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Rtu Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
14 — 3
14 — 3
Jaffer HussainMarriage Breakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam:A Comparative View, IIU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman 126 :If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separation has notbeen allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruel limitation of theright of free choice and society would have been deprived of happyiemarried state of life (Apabila tujuan perkawinan gagal dicapai,perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluar bagi para pihak, hal inimerupakan ketentuan
Register : 14-07-2017 — Putus : 03-08-2017 — Upload : 03-08-2017
Putusan PA RANTAU Nomor 0240/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Rtu Tanggal 3 Agustus 2017 — Penggugat vs Tergugat
14 — 2
14 — 2
Jaffer Hussain MarriageBreakdown Under The Law Reform Act, 1976 And In Islam : AComparative View, IIU law Journal, Vol I, No 1, 1989, halaman126 : If on the object of the marriage being defeated, separationhas not been allowed to the parties, this would has been a cruellimitation of the right of free choice and society would have beendeprived of happy married state of life (Apabila tujuanperkawinan gagal dicapai, perceraian tidak dijadikan jalan keluarbagi para pihak, hal ini merupakan ketentuan