Ditemukan 2113 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Putus : 14-02-2017 — Upload : 21-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2 PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017 Tanggal 14 Februari 2017 — PT. KARYA BERSAMA TAKAROB VS PT. ADHI KARYA (PERSERO) Tbk
776 — 445 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
776 — 445 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Undang Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1968 yang menyebutkan:"Either party may request annulment of the award by an application inwriting addressed to the SecretaryGeneral on one more of the followingground:a)b)c)that the Tribunal was not properly constituted;that the Tribunal has manifestly exceeded its powers;that there was corruption on the part of a member of the Tribunal;d) that there has been a serious departure from afundamental rule of procedure; ore) that the award has failed to state the reason on which
Register : 04-02-2015 — Putus : 29-07-2015 — Upload : 19-08-2015
Putusan PTUN JAKARTA Nomor 22/G/2015/PTUN-JKT Tanggal 29 Juli 2015 — INISIATIF MASYARAKAT PARTISIPATIF UNTUK TRANSISI BERKEADILAN (IMPARSIAL);I.MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA REPUBLIK INDONESIA, II. POLLYCARPUS BUDIHARI PRIYANTO
284 — 196
284 — 196
Bersyarat memang tidak diatur pengertian dan tolakukur keamanan, ketertiban umum dan rasa keadilan masyarakat olehkarena itu akan digunakan pengertian keamanan, ketertiban umum danrasa keadilan masyarakat dalam arti luas.24.Ketertiban umum didefinisikan secara internasional dalam kontekspenegakan hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Siracusa Principlessebagai the expression public order as used in the covenant may beHalaman 21 dari 120 halaman Perkara No.22/G/2015/PTUNJKTdefined as the sum of rules which
ensure the functioning of society or theset of fundamental principles on which society is founded.
Putus : 27-04-2020 — Upload : 17-12-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 18 P/HUM/2020 Tanggal 27 April 2020 — BUDIONO, dkk vs WALIKOTA SAMARINDA, dk
292 — 295 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
292 — 295 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The rule oflaw sendiri dimaknai sebagai a /egal system in which rules areclear, wellunderstood, and fairly enforcedsebuah sistemhukum yang jelas (kecil Kemungkinan untuk disalangunakan),Halaman 24 dari 49 halaman. Putusan Nomor 18 P/HUM/2020imudah dipahami, dan menjaga tegaknya keadilan.
Register : 13-11-2020 — Putus : 10-06-2021 — Upload : 30-07-2021
Putusan PN KLATEN Nomor 144/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kln Tanggal 10 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
PT TUNAS SAMUDRA KURNIA
Tergugat:
PT OTA INDONESIA
294 — 78
PT TUNAS SAMUDRA KURNIA
Tergugat:
PT OTA INDONESIA
294 — 78
190163 A tertanggal 30 November 2019;Bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan pembatasan pertanggungjawaban yang diaturdalam Ketentuan Perdagangan Umum (General Trading Conditions) dalam"Section General Condition Clause Nomor 15 and 16 The FIATA Rules forFreight Forwarding Services menyebutkan :15 (i). in no circumstances whatsoever shall the company be liableto the customer or owner for consequential loss or loss ofmarket however caused;(ii).Without prejudice to any other conditions herein orother defences which
Putus : 14-11-2017 — Upload : 13-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2083 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 14 Nopember 2017 — PT LEMBU ANDALAS LANGKAT VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
197 — 59 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
197 — 59 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
by Drew ConroyTo be culturally and historically accurate when defining an ox, we mustuse the "right" definition as provided by the Random House Dictionary,which says that an ox is "The adult castrated male of the genus Bosused as a draft animal and for fooa";"Only two species in the genus Bos used for work are called "oxen" Bosindicus (Zebutype cattle with humps) and Bos taurus, the Europeanbreeds (no humps).
Register : 11-11-2011 — Putus : 12-06-2014 — Upload : 12-09-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 5/PDT.SUS-MEREK/2014/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST Tanggal 12 Juni 2014 — YON NOFIAR >< 1. UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK INDONESIA ATMAJAYA ; 2. YAYASAN ATMAJAYA
288 — 111
288 — 111
(i) all acts of such a nature as to create confusion by any meansvhatever wth the establishment, the goods, or the industrial orcommercial activities, of a competitor;(ii) false allegations in the course of trade of such a nature as todiscredit the establishment, the goods, or the industrial or commercial activities, of a competitor;(iii) indications or allegations the use of which in the course oftrade is liable to mislead the public as to the nature, themanufacturing process, the characteristics
Register : 18-10-2016 — Putus : 18-04-2017 — Upload : 25-04-2019
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 757/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Tng. Tanggal 18 April 2017 —
126 — 51
126 — 51
Except for Malaysian children traveling to Sabah andSarawak which travel documents are prescribed below, copies of childrens birth certificates or identity cards* are required before they are allowed to board.Malaysian children traveling to Sabah or Sarawak:Children under the age of 12 shall be allowed to board by producing the original birth certificates or identity cards or Adoption Certificates (such Adoption Certificate shall beas prescribed by the National Registration Department of Malaysia
Putus : 20-07-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1280 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 20 Juli 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA
169 — 102 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
169 — 102 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
,;The obligations of PERTAMINA hereunder shall be deemedto have complied with the delivery to CONTRACTOR withinone hundred and twenty (120) days after the end of eachCalender Year, of documentary proof in accordance with theIndonesian fiscal laws that liability for the above mentionedtaxes has been satisfied, except that with repect to any ofsuch liabilities which CONTRACTORS may be obliged topay directly, PERTAMINA shall reimburse it only out of itsHalaman 14 dari 45 halaman.
Putus : 22-01-2013 — Upload : 27-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 635 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 22 Januari 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PERFEKTA NUSA;
71 — 148 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
71 — 148 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The law and reglations ofeach country lay down the forms of invoice, the time limit for itsissue, charges in invoices, and the use of credit notes.To prevent a possible black marked developing in the use of taxinvoices (which are a claim on the government, tantamount toprinting money and the classic way to evade VAT), requirement togive the name and address and reference of both seller and buyer,as well as the other statutory details should be strictly enforced."c.
Putus : 12-05-2015 — Upload : 27-11-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 234 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 Tanggal 12 Mei 2015 — PT. KALIMANTAN STEEL VS 1. PT. INDO METAL TECH PRODUCTS, DK
358 — 216 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
358 — 216 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
If, considering all thosecircumstances, you come to the conclusion that there will be acontusion that is to say not necessarily that one will be injured andthat the other will gain illicit benefit, but that there will be a confusion inthe mind of the public, which will lead to confusion in the goods orservicesthen you may refuse the registration, or rather you mustrefuse the registration in that case,Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia:Anda haruSs membandingkan kedua merek tersebut.
Putus : 09-02-2012 — Upload : 20-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 119 PK/Pdt.Sus/2011 Tanggal 9 Februari 2012 — ESPN STAR SPORTS (âÂÂESSâÂÂ), dk VS KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA REPUBLIK INDONESIA (KPPU)
599 — 1315 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
599 — 1315 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
dari kontenkonten liga sepakbola lainnya:"As described above, on the basis of this methodology based onsubstitutability of media rights in relation to the ability to attract viewersand/or subscribers EU competition authorities have consistentlyestablished a relevant product market for the acquisition of TVbroadcasting rights for football events that are played regularly througdhoutthe year", thereby not differentiating between foreign football leaques.The product definition applied by the KPPU which
adifferentiation between the BPL and other foreign leagues as a resultsignificantly differs from established EU practice.Such a differentiation would only seem justified from an EU competition lawperspective if the BPL rights could not be regarded as substitutes for themedia rights relating, to other domestic and foreign football leagues including for example the German Bundesliga, the Spanish Liga and theItalian Serie A in terms of the ability to attract viewers and/or subscribers.AGB Nielsen data, to which
is also referred in the reports of the KPPU,suggest that such a differentiation between the BPL nights and media rightsrelating to domestic and other foreign football leagues implying that theBPL content is unique in terms of attracting viewers and/or subscribers would not be justified.These market figures suggest that the upstream market for the acquisitionof media rights related to football events of which the BPL media rightsform part would include the rights, related to the Indonesian Liga Djarum
Jadi, tidak terdapat persyaratan hukum untuk pemenangtender mengadakan proses kompetitif yang terpisah guna menilalbagaimana memanfaatkan hak siar BPL berdasarkan pada SevenNetwork Limited v News Limited 2007 FCA 1062 at 1967 2003Judgement, particulary paragraph 1974 and 2003, which stated:The ability of any premium sports channel supplier to extractsustained returns above the competitive level would be constrained byHal. 108 dari 158 hal.
Putus : 10-12-2012 — Upload : 11-07-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 166/B/PK/PJK/2011 Tanggal 10 Desember 2012 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. JAS-AERO Engineering Services
29 — 14 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
29 — 14 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
penting.Selanjutnya, transportasi udara memberikan kontribusi untukpeningkatan atas perkembangan dan ekspansi perjalanan danperdagangan internasional yang juga tercakup dalam ICAO;Bahwa dalam Doc. 9028/7 pada halaman Foreword disebutkan dengantegas sebagai berikut:"As considered by the Council, a charge is a levy that is designed andapplied specifically to recover the costs of providing facilities and servicesfor civil aviation and a tax is levy is designed to raise national or localgovernment revenues which
Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 435 B/PK/PJK/2015 Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. BHUMIREKSA NUSASEJATI vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
42 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
42 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Menurut Adriaan Bedner yang diartikan dengan reformatio in peiusadalah:Reformatio in peius means that a citizen appeals against a decision eitherat the instance which issued the decision, a special instance forHalaman 33 dari 39 halaman.
Register : 29-09-2016 — Putus : 16-11-2016 — Upload : 21-02-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 510/Pdt.G/KPPU/2016/PN JKT PST Tanggal 16 Nopember 2016 — Toray Advance Materials Korea Inc,Cs >< Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia (âÂÂKPPUâÂÂ)
548 — 193
548 — 193
The United States has sought toimplement its antitrust laws, the Sherman Act, which has both civil andcriminal features...... The United States has given these laws anextraterritorial effects to extend to allege monopolistic agreement governingtrade and commerce abroad whose effects, however remote, is felt in theUnited States.....Terjemahan:Kedaultan negara dan yurisdiksi terhubung dengan wilayahnya.
Putus : 13-02-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 12 /B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 13 Februari 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA
45 — 47 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
45 — 47 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
,;The obligations of PERTAMINA hereunder shall bedeemed to have complied with the delivery toCONTRACTOR within one hundred and twenty (120)days after the end of each Calender Year, ofdocumentary proof in accordance with the Indonesianfiscal laws that liability for the above mentioned taxes hasbeen satisfied, except that with repect to any of suchliabilities which CONTRACTORS may be obliged to paydirectly, PERTAMINA shall reimburse it only out of itsshare of production hereunder within sixty (60)
Register : 25-04-2019 — Putus : 27-06-2019 — Upload : 12-09-2019
Putusan PT PEKANBARU Nomor 83/PDT/2019/PT PBR Tanggal 27 Juni 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat : PT DRYDOCK PERTAMA
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT LINKEN MULTI KARYA
117 — 88
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT LINKEN MULTI KARYA
117 — 88
Law and ArbitrationAll questions, disputes or differences whatsoever which mayany time hereafter arise between the parties hereto touching orconcerning this Agreement or its construction or effect or as torights, duties or liabilities of the parties hereto or either of themunder or by virtue of this Agreement or otherwise as to anyother matter in any way connected with or arising out of or inrelation to the subject matter of this Agreement shall bereferred to arbitration in Singapore by a single
Putus : 19-06-2017 — Upload : 20-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1133/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 19 Juni 2017 — PT JEMBAYAN MUARABARA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
30 — 27 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
30 — 27 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Procedure follows substance;substance tell us which areas of procedure will become important.(Prosedur, hanya merupakan sarana untuk mencapai tujuan, tujuantersebutlah yang merupakan problem kolektif apapun dari masyarakatyang dimaksudkan untuk dilawan. Prosedur mengikuti substansi, dansubstansilah yang memberitahu kita, bidangbidang prosedur mana yangmenjadi penting).(Ali, Achmad., Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan, Volume1.
Register : 22-06-2012 — Putus : 28-03-2013 — Upload : 04-05-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 370/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. Tanggal 28 Maret 2013 — PT SANDIPALA ARTHAPUTRA.
Lawan
1. MUEHLBAUER AG.
2. MUEHLBAUER TECHNOLOGIES Sdn Bhd.
372 — 300
372 — 300
SAT may not unreasonablyrefuse by the Buyer in case of any detected minor defects, which are to beremedied by the Seller within the scope of the warranty terms. SAT shallbe deemed to be passed successfully, if the Buyer takes the hardware/software into use without signature of SAT.
SAT may not unreasonablyrefuse by the Buyer in case of any detected minor defects, which are to beremedied by the Seller within the scope of the warranty terms. SAT shallHal 45 dari 128 hal. Putusan No. 370/Pdt.G/2012/PN.JKT.Sel.be deemed to be passed successfully, if the Buyer takes the hardware/software into use without signature of SAT.
The Fiduciary Warranty shall cover all movableassets which shall be delivered by the Seller according to the MainContract or its Amendments, especially the machines according toAttachment I.
Putus : 14-09-2016 — Upload : 11-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1112/B/PK/PJK/2016 Tanggal 14 September 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. ASTRA DAIHATSU MOTOR
292 — 181 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
292 — 181 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
If an element within the scope of thisStandard does not meet the definition of intangibleasset, the amount derived from its purchase or generateit internally by the entity, is recognized as an expense inthe period in which incurred.
Putus : 14-02-2013 — Upload : 17-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 634/B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 14 Februari 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. PERFEKTA NUSA
29 — 18 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
29 — 18 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The law andreglations of each country lay down the forms of invoice, thetime limit for its issue, charges in invoices, and the use of creditnotes.To prevent a possible black markert developing in the use of taxinvoices (Which are a claim on the government, tantamount toprinting money and the classic way to evade VAT), requirementto give the name and address and reference of both seller andbuyer, as vell as the other statutory details should be strictlyenforced. "Halaman 37 dari 40 halaman.