Ditemukan 2113 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Register : 25-04-2019 — Putus : 27-06-2019 — Upload : 12-09-2019
Putusan PT PEKANBARU Nomor 83/PDT/2019/PT PBR Tanggal 27 Juni 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat : PT DRYDOCK PERTAMA
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT LINKEN MULTI KARYA
118 — 90
Terbanding/Penggugat : PT LINKEN MULTI KARYA
118 — 90
Law and ArbitrationAll questions, disputes or differences whatsoever which mayany time hereafter arise between the parties hereto touching orconcerning this Agreement or its construction or effect or as torights, duties or liabilities of the parties hereto or either of themunder or by virtue of this Agreement or otherwise as to anyother matter in any way connected with or arising out of or inrelation to the subject matter of this Agreement shall bereferred to arbitration in Singapore by a single
Register : 29-09-2016 — Putus : 16-11-2016 — Upload : 21-02-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 510/Pdt.G/KPPU/2016/PN JKT PST Tanggal 16 Nopember 2016 — Toray Advance Materials Korea Inc,Cs >< Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia (âÂÂKPPUâÂÂ)
571 — 193
571 — 193
The United States has sought toimplement its antitrust laws, the Sherman Act, which has both civil andcriminal features...... The United States has given these laws anextraterritorial effects to extend to allege monopolistic agreement governingtrade and commerce abroad whose effects, however remote, is felt in theUnited States.....Terjemahan:Kedaultan negara dan yurisdiksi terhubung dengan wilayahnya.
Register : 23-03-2017 — Putus : 17-05-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 673 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 17 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS BUT. MITSU MIIKE MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED ;
48 — 30 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
48 — 30 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Dalam hal perusahaan induk dari Wajib Pajak BUT adalahpenduduk dari negara yang telah mempunyai PersetujuanPenghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B) dengan Indonesia, makabesarnya tarif untuk penerapan ketentuan sebagaimanadimaksud dalam Pasal 1 ayat (1) adalah sebagaimanaditentukan dalam P3B tersebut;Protocol antara Pemerintah Indonesia dan Jepang:Angka 5 (a):...on the earnings (other than those derived from the operationof ships or aircraft in international traffic) of a company being aresident of Japan which
Putus : 22-11-2012 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 189/B/PK/PJK/2011 Tanggal 22 Nopember 2012 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. JAS-AERO ENGINEERING SERVICES
153 — 66 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
153 — 66 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
penting.Selanjutnya, transportasi udara memberikan kontribusi untukpeningkatan atas perkembangan dan ekspansi perjalanan danperdagangan internasional yang juga tercakup dalam ICAO;Bahwa dalam Doc. 9082/7 pada halaman Foreword disebutkan dengantegas sebagai berikut:As consideied by the Council a charge is a levy that is designed andapplied specifically to recover the costs of providing facilities andservices for civil aviation and a tax is levy is designed to raise nationalor local goverment revenues which
Register : 06-01-2020 — Putus : 14-04-2020 — Upload : 10-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 15 P/HUM/2020 Tanggal 14 April 2020 — SAIFUL MASHUD, SH, DKK VS MENTERI KETENAGAKERJAAN RI;
455 — 207 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
455 — 207 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The rule of law sendiridimaknai sebagai a /ega/ system in which rules are clear, wellunderstood, and fairly enforced sebuah sistem hukum yang jelas(kecil kKemungkinan untuk disalangunakan), mudah dipahami, danmenjaga tegaknya keadilan. Kepastian hukum menjadi salah ciri theHalaman 30 dari 53 halaman.
Register : 17-11-2017 — Putus : 07-08-2018 — Upload : 27-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 625/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Pst Tanggal 7 Agustus 2018 — Penggugat:
PT INTERNUX
Tergugat:
PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT,
334 — 118
PT INTERNUX
Tergugat:
PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT,
334 — 118
Internux issue the SBLC (Standby Letter of Credit) to cover the coming4,8M USD overdue payment (forecast before Oct), which the valid periodtill end of 2017;3. Internux issue Lippo Insurance Corporate Guarantee to support total 15MUSD refinancing by the Mid of July, to support the refinancing facility fromSinosure;Option B:1. Huawei will support the temporary license till to the Oct, and commit to sellthe License (DRA/MSC/UGW/USN/UPCC/HSS BE) to Internux after refinancing success;2.
perkara a quo,dikarenakan PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT telah memilih forumlembaga arbitrase yaitu Badan Arbitrase Nasional Republik Indonesia(selanjutnya disebut sebagai BANI), sebagai forum penyelesaiansengketa.Bahwa pemilihan BANI sebagai forum penyelesaian sengketa secarategas diatur:Article 15Dispute SettlementAny dispute arising hereunder or connected with this Contract,including a dispute as to the validity or existence of this Contract,Shall be resolved amicably within 30 (thirty) days, failing which
optik, radio, atau sistem elektromagnetiklainnya.Sedangkan yang dimaksud dengan penyelenggaratelekomunikasiadalah badan usaha yang melakukan kegiatan usaha di bidangtelekomunikasi.Bahwa TERGUGAT merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidangmanufaktur dan pemasok peralatan dan layanan penunjangtelekomunikasi dan tidak bergerak di bidang telekomunikasi.Supplierisa company running business asmanufacturerandsupplier of equipment of service for Base Transceiver Station (BTS)and telecommunication netwok which
Register : 22-06-2012 — Putus : 28-03-2013 — Upload : 04-05-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 370/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. Tanggal 28 Maret 2013 — PT SANDIPALA ARTHAPUTRA.
Lawan
1. MUEHLBAUER AG.
2. MUEHLBAUER TECHNOLOGIES Sdn Bhd.
385 — 312
385 — 312
SAT may not unreasonablyrefuse by the Buyer in case of any detected minor defects, which are to beremedied by the Seller within the scope of the warranty terms. SAT shallbe deemed to be passed successfully, if the Buyer takes the hardware/software into use without signature of SAT.
SAT may not unreasonablyrefuse by the Buyer in case of any detected minor defects, which are to beremedied by the Seller within the scope of the warranty terms. SAT shallHal 45 dari 128 hal. Putusan No. 370/Pdt.G/2012/PN.JKT.Sel.be deemed to be passed successfully, if the Buyer takes the hardware/software into use without signature of SAT.
The Fiduciary Warranty shall cover all movableassets which shall be delivered by the Seller according to the MainContract or its Amendments, especially the machines according toAttachment I.
Register : 22-07-2021 — Putus : 05-08-2021 — Upload : 05-08-2021
Putusan PA SURABAYA Nomor 2215/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Sby Tanggal 5 Agustus 2021 — Pemohon melawan Termohon
36 — 1
36 — 1
Keadilan berasal dari kata justice, yangmenurut Institute of Justinian, istilah justice dirumuskan sebagai:Justiceis the constant and continual purpose which given to everyone his own.Keadilan merupakan istilah yang dipergunakan dalam hubungannyaantara rakyat dan pemerintah.Keadilan berkaitan dengan hak seseorang apa yang seharusnyaditerimanya, sehingga apabila seseorang tidak menerima apa yangmenjadi haknya, maka dianggap tidak adil, bahkan mencederai rasakeadilan.
Register : 02-08-2012 — Putus : 11-10-2012 — Upload : 26-08-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 245/PDT.G/2012/PN.JKT.PST Tanggal 11 Oktober 2012 — DEWI LARAS ATI, SH,Cs >< WILLIAM DALE BREENLEE Jr,Cs
189 — 56
189 — 56
On occasion, the way hepressured us to take unilaterally the concept of in collaboration, which is notrecognized in the LOI, including how he always threaten us to terminate thecooperation, how he always under estimate the importance of our local bar licenseto sponsor him/DFDL, how he always mention that we are all are replaceableanytime, and how he always mention his intention to leave DFDL Indonesia wthina year after, are some of few examples of his flaw, insensitive attitudes andignorance of local
Register : 27-08-2013 — Putus : 03-07-2014 — Upload : 04-04-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 378/Pdt.G/2013/PN.JKT.PST Tanggal 3 Juli 2014 — PT. JABATEX >< MAYER & CIE Gmbh & Co KG (dahulu bernama Mayer & Cie. Gmbh & Co),Cs
350 — 102
350 — 102
antara lain menyatakan batal Perjanjian UtangPiutang (vide petitum gugatan no. 4 dan 6);Pasal 13.2 Perjanjian Utang Piutang menyatakan sebagai berikut:Failing such an amicable settlement, any dispute arising out of or inconnection with this Agreement, including any question regarding itsexistence, validity or termination, shall be referred to and finally resolved byarbitration in Jakarta in accordance with the Indonesian National Board ofArbitration Rules ("BANI Rules") for the time being in force, which
Putus : 19-10-2016 — Upload : 02-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 453 PK/Pdt/2016 Tanggal 19 Oktober 2016 — BPKP PERWAKILAN JAWA TENGAH VS M. THORIQ, SH., S.SOS., M.Kn., M.Si.
117 — 54 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
117 — 54 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Loebbecke dalamBukunya Auditing An Itegrated Approach yang diterbitkan olehPrentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, halaman 171172dinyatakan:In deciding which audit procedures to use, there are seven broadcategones of evidence from which the auditor can choose. Thesecategones, referred to as types of evidence, are listed below anddefined and discussed in this section; Physical Examination;Halaman 68 dari 89 hal. Put.
Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1027/B/PK/PJK/2014 Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. GAPURA ANGKASA
42 — 23 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
42 — 23 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Bahwa di dalam huruf a article 92 Konvensi Chicago 1944,disebutkan "this convention shall be open for adherence bymembers of the united nations and states with then, and stateswhich remained neutral during the present world conflictkemudian di huruf b disebutkan adherence shall be effected bya notification addressed to the government of the United Statesof America and shall take effect as from the thirtieth day from thereceipt of the notification by the government of the United Statesof America, which
Putus : 19-06-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1132/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 19 Juni 2017 — PT JEMBAYAN MUARABARA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
42 — 26 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
42 — 26 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Procedure follows substance;substance tell us which areas of procedure will become important. .(Prosedur, hanya merupakan sarana untuk mencapai tujuan, tujuantersebutlah yang merupakan problem kolektif apapun dari masyarakatyang dimaksudkan untuk dilawan. Prosedur mengikuti substansi, dansubstansilah yang memberitahu kita, bidangbidang prosedur mana yangmenjadi penting).(Ali, Achmad., Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan, Volume1.
Putus : 19-06-2017 — Upload : 20-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1134/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 19 Juni 2017 — PT JEMBAYAN MUARABARA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
51 — 45 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
51 — 45 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Procedure follows substance;substance tell us which areas of procedure will become important.(Prosedur, hanya merupakan sarana untuk mencapai tujuan, tujuantersebutlah yang merupakan problem kolektif apapun dari masyarakatyang dimaksudkan untuk dilawan. Prosedur mengikuti substansi, dansubstansilah yang memberitahu kita, bidangbidang prosedur mana yangmenjadi penting).(Ali, Achmad., Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan, Volume1.
Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 438 B/PK/PJK/2015 Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. BHUMIREKSA NUSASEJATI vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
35 — 6 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
35 — 6 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Menurut Adriaan Bedner yang diartikan denganreformatio in peius adalah:Reformatio in peius means that a citizen appeals against a decision either at the instance which issued the decision, a special instance foradministrative appeal or the administrative court and that the outcome ofthe appeal puts him in a worse situation than he was before appealing.bahwa penghitungan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Pajak Nomor Put.39479/PP/M.1/16/2012 diucapkan pada tanggal 30 Juli 2012, adalahPutusan yang lebih berat
Putus : 19-12-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1587/B/PK/PJK/2016 Tanggal 19 Desember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA
35 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
35 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
,;The obligations of PERTAMINA hereunder shall be deemedto have complied with the delivery to CONTRACTOR withinone hundred and twenty (120) days after the end of eachCalender Year, of documentary proof in accordance with theIndonesian fiscal laws that liability for the above mentionedtaxes has been satisfied, except that with repect to any ofsuch liabilities which CONTRACTORS may be obliged toHalaman 14 dari 45 halaman.
Register : 02-01-2020 — Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 20-03-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 6 P/HUM/2020 Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — Dr. Hj. NURHAJIZAH M., SH.,MH VS KETUA KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM RI (KPU RI);
392 — 802 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
392 — 802 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The rule of law sendiri dimaknai sebagaia legal system in which rules are clear, wellunderstood, andfairlyenforced sebuah sistem hukum yang jelas (kecil kKemungkinan untukdisalahgunakan), mudah dipahami, dan menjaga tegaknya keadilan.Kepastian hukum menjadi salah ciri the rule of law, yang di dalamnyamengandung asas legalitas, prediktibilitas, dan transparansi;2/.Bahwa kepastian hukum atau /egal certainty dalam tradisi klasik the ruleof law menurut pendapat dari Friedrrich von Hayek adalah salah
Register : 08-12-2010 — Putus : 22-01-2013 — Upload : 23-10-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 624 B/PK/PJK/2010 Tanggal 22 Januari 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. PERFEKTA NUSA;
47 — 25 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
47 — 25 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The law and reglations of each countrylay down the forms of invoice, the time limit for its issue, charges ininvoices, and the use of credit notes.To prevent a possible black marked developing in the use of tax invoices(which are a claim on the government, tantamount to printing money andthe classic way to evade VAT), requirement to give the name and addressand reference of both seller and buyer, as well as the other statutorydetails should be strictly enforced."Halaman 37 dari 40 halaman.
Register : 23-02-2017 — Putus : 17-04-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 415 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 17 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. JASA PRIMA RAYA;
31 — 14 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
31 — 14 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
(3) huruf d) dan e) Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda(Tax Treaty Agreement) antara Indonesia dan Kanada mengatur:The term permanent establishment "shall not be deemed to include themaintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose ofpurchasing goods or merchandise, or for collecting information, for theenterprise) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for thepurpose of advertising, for the supply of information, for scientific research,or for similar activities which
Register : 29-10-2015 — Putus : 09-06-2016 — Upload : 13-11-2019
Putusan PN BATAM Nomor 245/PDT.G/2015/PN Btm Tanggal 9 Juni 2016 — PT. BUANA LISTYA TAMA, Tbk., PT. BUANA BENUA SHIPPING,
434 — 444
434 — 444
BUANA SUCCESS XI with yourtowing barge come passing with very slow speed when passing my vesselfrom my port side at 14.25 LT your vessel with towing barge was collided ourvessel on my bulbous area with estimate damage size length 1.5 mtr, wide1.5 mtr and dented 30 cm which caused seriously damage on frame number139 to 140 as per attached photo to our vessel on bulbous area of MT GasMaluku.Terjemahan bebasnya:Kapal kami MT Gas Maluku, pada pelayaran ke 17/14, dalam kondisikosong tanpa muatan (hanya