Ditemukan 1697 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 04-02-2020 — Putus : 31-03-2020 — Upload : 31-03-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 98/PDT/2020/PT DKI
Tanggal 31 Maret 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. LAYAR SENTOSA SHIPPING
Terbanding/Tergugat I : WALLEM & CO LIMITED
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WALLEM SENTOSA SHIPPING SERVICE
5951042
  • Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan Pasal 2.1Joint Venture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Conditional upon the availability of all the necessary licenses,authorizations, consents or approvals of the relevant governmentalauthorities, the parties hereby agree to establish a joint venturebetween themselves under the proposed name "P. T.
    TheCompany may be in such other name as the relevant authorities inthe Republic of Indonesia shall allow and the Parties hereto shallagree. The formation of the Company will be done by virtue of theprovisions of the Foreign Investment Law (Law No. 1 of 1967 asamended by law Noll of 1970) and other relevant provisions ofapplicable Laws of the Republic of Indonesia as duly amendedhal 51 dari 96 hal put.
    Untuk lebih jelasnya, kami kutip ketentuan dalam Pasal2.1 Joint Venture Agreement, sebagai berikut:"Conditional upon the availability of all the necessary licenses,authorizations, consents or approvals of the relevant governmentalauthorities, the parties hereby agree to establish a joint venturebetween themselves under the proposed name "P. T.
    TheCompany may be in such other name as the relevant authorities inthe Republic of Indonesia shall allow and the Parties hereto shallagree. The formation of the Company will be done by virtue of theprovisions of the Foreign Investment Law (Law No. 1 of 1967 asamended by law No.
    /II of 1970) and other relevant provisions ofapplicable Laws of the Republic of Indonesia as duly amended andrevised and as duly administratively classified from time to time bythe Indonesia authorities; the Parties will submit a formal applicationhal 75 dari 96 hal put.
Register : 05-02-2016 — Putus : 18-03-2016 — Upload : 27-06-2019
Putusan PA TEMBILAHAN Nomor 0099/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Tbh
Tanggal 18 Maret 2016 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
174
  • . , Maninggal dunia pada usia 6 tahun6 bulan, anak tersebut sekarang dalam asuhan Penggugat:Bahwa selama dalam lkatan Lampe tarsabut eae Genganorang tua Pe age at tdi ParitF ralaniggE sin Diss Parties aalenia tama ii2 tahun kemudian pindah di menah kediaman hersama di Part Teluk Bakaselama kurang lebih 11 tahun kemudian pindah di rumah kontrakan di Sungai Guntung selama kurang lebih 2 tahun kemudian terakhir pindah di rumahkontraan di Sungai Guntung selama kurang jebhh 8 tahun & bulan:Bahwa sejak
Register : 29-04-2021 — Putus : 05-08-2021 — Upload : 20-08-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 202/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 5 Agustus 2021 — Pemohon:
PT. BANK QNB INDONESIA TBK
Termohon:
1.PT. CISADANE RAYA CHEMICALS
2.LUSIANA
3.DIANA TJHANG
4.PT. DINARETTA LESTARI
56499
  • Section 2.1:Guarantee, The Guarantor unconditionally and irrevocablyguarantees to each Finance Party, as a continuing obligation, the dueand punctual payment and discharge of the Secured Obligations inthe currency or respective currencies in which the same is payableunder the terms of the Finance Documents, notwithstanding anydispute between the Security Agent or the Finance Parties and anObligor, and if an Obligor fails to pay any amount of the SecuredObligations when due the Guarantor shall pay
    This Guarantee is in addition to, anySecurity, guarantee or other security or right or remedy now or at anytime hereafter held by or available to the Security Agent or any otherFinance Party.Section 2.4:Waivers, The Guarantor waives in favour of the Security Agent andthe Finance Parties any and all of its rights, protection, privileges, anddefences provided by law to a guarantor and in particular theprovisions in Article 1430, 1831, 1883, 1837, 1843, 1847 through1850 of the Indonesian Civil Code
    Section 2.4:Waivers, The Guarantor waives in favour of the Security Agent andthe Finance Parties any and all of its rights, protection, privileges, anddefences provided by law to a guarantor and in particular theprovisions in Article 1430, 1831, 1883, 1837, 1843, 1847 through1850 of the Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab UndangUndang HukumPerdata).Terjemahan tersumpah dalam Bahasa Indonesia:Halaman 12 dari 75 Halaman Putusan Nomor 202/Pdt.SusPKPU/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.PstBagian 2.1:Jaminan.
    Manner of EnforcementIf the Security Agent (acting on the instructions of the Lenders)is instructed to enforce the Security, it may do so in suchmanner as it sees fit, with due observance of the provisions ofthe Security Documents and all applicable law, and solelyhaving regard to the interests of the Secured Parties as aivnole and without having regard to the interests of anyindividual Secured Party.Terjemahan Tersumpah dalam Bahasa Indonesia:"4.
Register : 15-05-2012 — Putus : 11-03-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.43865/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 11 Maret 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12340
  • Appendix 1, Annex 5, Rule of Origin For The Asean China Free Trade Area,Rule Definition : For The Purpose of This Annex, menyatakan : :a Party means the individual parties the agreement i.e. Brunei Darussalam, theKingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao Peoples DemocraticRepublic (Lao PDR), Malaysia, the Union of Myanmar, the Republic ofPhilippines, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand, the SosialistRepublic of Vietnam and the Peoples Republic of China (China).2.
    The third party invoice number should be indicated inBox 10 of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), the exporter and consignee mustbe located in the Parties and the copy of the third party invoice shall be attachedto the Certificate of Origin (Form E) when presenting to the Customs Authorityof the importing Party.bahwa berdasarkan pemeriksaan Majelis atas buktibukti yang disampaikan di dalampersidangan, kedapatan sebagai berikut :bahwa berdasarkan pemeriksaan Majelis atas PIB Nomor 023543 tanggal
Register : 21-05-2013 — Putus : 05-11-2014 — Upload : 31-03-2016
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-56867/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 5 Nopember 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
18461
  • T.or Consumption There; and (iii) The Products HaveUndergone Any Operation There Other Than UnloadingReloading or any Other Operation to Preserve Them in GCondition;bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam AppendivAttachment A, Revised Operational Certification Proce(OCP) for The Rules of origin of the ASEANChina Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: ForPurpose of Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origirthe ACFTA, Where Transportation is Effected TroughTerritory of One or More NonACFTA Parties
    There; and (iii)Products Have Not Undergone Any Operation There Other Than Unloading and Reloaor any Other Operation to Preserve Them in Good Condition;bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A, RevOperational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin of the ASEANCIFree Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: For The Purpose of Implementing 1S(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, Where Transportation is Effected TroughTerritory of One or More NonACFTA Parties
Register : 07-06-2011 — Putus : 05-03-2014 — Upload : 10-11-2014
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor PUT.51074/PP/M.XIB/16/2014
Tanggal 5 Maret 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
22467
  • Putusan Pengadilan Pajak Nomor : PUT.51074/PP/M.XIB/16/2014Jenis PajakTahun PajakPokok SengketaMenurut TerbandingMenurut PemohonMenurut Majelis: Pajak Pertambahan Nilai: 2009: bahwa yang menjadi pokok sengketa adalah pengajuan banding terhadap KoreksiPajak Masukan pemanfaatan BKP tidak berwujud dan JKP dari Luar Daerah Pabeansebesar Rp201.391.179,00;: bahwa jenis kegiatan usaha Pemohon Banding dimana bahan baku, pembuatansampai dengan penjualan hasil produksi kepada related parties adalah merupakanmanufacturing
Putus : 15-08-2013 — Upload : 20-06-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 212 K/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2013
Tanggal 15 Agustus 2013 — PT. GLOBAL MEDIACOM TBK. (“MCOM”) yang diwakili oleh Direksi: 1. M. BUDI RUSTANTO, 2. HANDHIANTO SURYO KENTJONO VS KT CORPORATION
17821534 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ;The Tribunal hereby authorises and grants power of attorney toeach of the Parties hereto and any Indonesian counsel appointedby either (any) of them, to apply for and undertake registration ofthis Award with the District Court of Central Jakarta, or anyother court in which such registration is required to be made, allin accordance with the requirement of Article 67 of Indonesia'sArbitration Law, Law No 30 of 1999.;All other claims are rejected.
    Nomor 212 K/Pdt.Sus Arbitrase/2013menurut ketentuan hukum Republik Indonesia dianggap sebagai suatu putusanArbitrase Internasional.";"1,3 Huruf (e) Pasal V Konvensi New York Tahun 1958 berbunyisebagai berikut:Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused, at the request ofthe party against whom it revoked, only if the party furnishes to the competentauthority where the recognition and enforcement is sought, proof that:(e) the award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been
    Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused, at the request ofthe party against whom it revoked, only if the party furnishes to the competentauthority where the recognition and enforcement is sought, proof that:(e) the award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set asideor suspended by competent authority of the country in which, or under thelaw, that award was made";Terjemahannya:"1.
    The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set asideor suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or underthe law of which, that award was made";Adapun terjemahan tersumpahnya menyatakan sebagai berikut (Bukti P4.b):"Pengakuan dan pelaksanaan keputusan dapat ditolak, atas permohonan pihakterhadap mana putusan itu diterapkan, hanya jika pihak itu menyediakanotoritas yang berwenang di mana pengakuan dan pelaksanaan itu diupayakan,membuktikan bahwa:(e).
Register : 15-05-2012 — Putus : 11-03-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.43864/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 11 Maret 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12036
  • Appendix 1, Annex 5, Rule of Origin For The Asean China FreeTrade Area, Rule Definition : For The Purpose of This Annex,menyatakan : :a Party means the individual parties the agreement i.e. BruneiDarussalam, the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia,the Lao Peoples Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), Malaysia, theUnion of Myanmar, the Republic of Philippines, the Republic ofSingapore, the Kingdom of Thailand, the Sosialist Republic ofVietnam and the Peoples Republic of China (China).2.
    The third party invoice number should be indicated in Box 10of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), the exporter and consignee mustbe located in the Parties and the copy of the third party invoice shallbe attached to the Certificate of Origin (Form E) when presenting tothe Customs Authority of the importing Party.bahwa berdasarkan pemeriksaan Majelis atas buktibukti yangdisampaikan di dalam persidangan, kedapatan sebagai berikut :bahwa berdasarkan pemeriksaan Majelis atas PIB Nomor 013723 tanggal12
Register : 11-10-2012 — Putus : 08-10-2014 — Upload : 04-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-55976/PP/M.VIIIB/15/2014
Tanggal 8 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
21164
  • karena dianggap tidak membuat faktur pajak atas koreksi peredaran ekspor;bahwa yang menjadi pokok sengketa adalah koreksi positif Terbanding atas PeredaranUsaha sebesar Rp7.395.779.481,00 di mana koreksi Terbanding tersebut terkait transaksiantar pihak yang mempunyai hubungan istimewa yang tidak sesuai dengan prinsipkewajaran dan kelaziman usaha yang tidak dipengaruhi hubungan istimewa;bahwa koreksi Terbanding tersebut dilakukan karena terdapat hubungan istimewa antPemohon Banding dengan related parties
Register : 30-05-2012 — Putus : 28-05-2013 — Upload : 08-11-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.45186/PP/M.VII/19/2013
Tanggal 28 Mei 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11825
  • The third party invoice number should be indicated inBox 10 of the Certificate of Origin (Form E), the exporter and consignee must be located in the Parties and the copy of the thirdparty invoice shall be attached to the Certificate of Origin (FormE) when presenting to the Customs Authority of the importingParty.3) Bahwa sebagai penegas atas aturan baru dalam OCPACFTA tersebutdikeluarkanlah Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai NomorSE12 /BC/2011 tanggal O03 Oktober 2011 tentang PetunjukPelaksanaan
    The third partyinvoice number should be indicated in Box 10 of the Certificate of Origin(Form E), the exporter and consignee must be located in the Parties and thecopy of the third party invoice shall be attached to the Certificate of Origin(Form E) when presenting to the Customs Authority of the importing Partyyang telah disahkan dengan Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 37Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengesahan Second Protocol To Amend The AgreementOn Trade In Goods Of The Framework Agreement On
Putus : 05-02-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2013
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 731/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Dps
Tanggal 5 Februari 2013 —
166
  • Foto copy Parti Culars of Parties of Marriage Nomor : 19/2007, yang diterbitkandi Westport, New Zealand atas nama TERGUGAT dan PENGGUGAT, laludiberi tanda bukti P.1 5 222 nn no nonce nonee52. Foto copy Surat Keterangan Pendaftaran Perkawinan antara Penggugatdengan Tergugat, yang dikeluarkan oleh Walikota Denpasar tanggal 25 Juni2007 Reg.
Register : 13-11-2013 — Putus : 16-10-2014 — Upload : 13-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-56166/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
14434
  • TheProducts Have Not Undergone Any Operation There Other Than Unloadingand Reloading or any Other Operation to Preserve Them in Good Condition, bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A,Revised Operational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin ofthe ASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: ForThe Purpose of Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA,Where Transportation is Effected Trough the Territory of One or MoreNonACFTA Parties
    Products Have Not Undergone Any OperationThere Other Than Unloading and Reloading or any Other Operation to PreserveThem in Good Condition.bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A, RevisedOperational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin of theASEANChina Free Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: For The Purposeof Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, WhereTransportation is Effected Trough the Territory of One or More NonACFTA Parties
Register : 24-06-2013 — Putus : 24-09-2014 — Upload : 17-11-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put-55486/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014
Tanggal 24 September 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
14638
  • or Consumption There; andThe Products Have Not Undergone Any Operation TOther Than Unloading and Reloading or any OOperation to Preserve Them in Good Condition;e bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam AppendiAttachment A, Revised Operational Certification Proce(OCP) for The Rules of origin of the ASEANChina ~Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: ForPurpose of Implementing Rule 8(c) of the Rules of Origirthe ACFTA, Where Transportation is Effected TroughTerritory of One or More NonACFTA Parties
    There;(iii) The Products Have Not Undergone Any Operation There Other Than UnloadingReloading or any Other Operation to Preserve Them in Good Condition ;bahwa pelaksanaan ketentuan di atas dalam Appendix 1, Attachment A, RevOperational Certification Procedure (OCP) for The Rules of origin of the ASEANCIFree Trade Area (ROO), Rule 21, sebagai berikut: For The Purpose of ImplemenRule 8(c) of the Rules of Origin for the ACFTA, Where Transportation is Effected Trothe Territory of One or More NonACFTA Parties
Putus : 12-04-2016 — Upload : 27-03-2017
Putusan PN SERANG Nomor 40/PDT.G/2015/PN SRG
Tanggal 12 April 2016 — PERDATA - PT. IGAS UTAMA LAWAN - PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, DKK
24588
  • BOTH PARTIES agreed to enter a good faith negotiation in the event ofany disputes arise pursuant to this AGREEMENT.Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Srg. Hal 15 dari 113 Hal3. In the event that BOTH PARTIES fail to achieve a settlementagreement after 90 (ninety) calendars DAYS of negotiation, BOTHPARTIES agreed to settle the disputes at the Indonesian NationalArbitrary Agency (BANI) in Jakarta.4. The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and become binding toBOTH PARTIES.
    BOTH PARTIES (catatan dari TERGUGAT Il: BOTH PARTIESadalah PENGGUGAT dan TERGUGAT dengan TERGUGATll) shall in the first instance attempt to resolve any and alldisputes, controversies, and conflicts which may arisingbetween them in connection with this Agreement amicably bymutual and good faith consultation, conciliation, andcooperation2.
    In the event that BOTH PARTIES are unable to resolve anydispute arising within the context of this Agreement within 60(sixty) days after a Party request the other Party to engage inconsultations for settlement, unless otherwise agreed upon inwriting among Both Parties, either Party may requestsubmission of the dispute to arbitration pursuant to the rules ofBADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA/BANI (hereafterreferred to as the Rules). Said arbitration shall take place inJAKARTA.
    BOTH PARTIES agreed to enter a good faith negotiation in the event of any disputes arise pursuant to this AGREEMENT;3. In the event that BOTH PARTIES fail to achieve a settlementagreement after 90 (ninety) calendar DAYS of negotiation,BOTH PARTIES agreed to settle the dispute at the IndonesianNational Arbitrary Agency (BANI) in Jakarta.4.
    In the event that BOTH PARTIES (PENGGUGAT,TERGUGAT dan TERGUGAT Il) are unable to resolve anydispute arising within the context of this Agreement within60 (sixty) days after a Party request the other Party toengage in consultations for settlement, unless otherwiseagreed upon in writing among Both Parties, either Partymay request submission of the dispute to arbitrationPutusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 40/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Srg.
Register : 17-05-2013 — Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 27-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Lawan 1. PT. BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2. H. ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA, 3. YUDHA TRISNO, 4. SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA, 5. MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN, 6. PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN, 8. ANKIT PATNI, Penggugat: PT PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Tergugat: 1.PT BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2.H ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA 3.YUDHA TRISNO 4.SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA 5.MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN 6.PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN 7.SUWARNO 8.ANKIT PATNI 9.SKP OVERSEAS PTE,LTD 10.HADI JUANA 11.OLFITRIAN 12.PT CAKRA KARYA BERSAMA 13.PT SOLUSINDO NUSANTARA 14.TRADE CONSORTIUM PTE LTD 15.NOTARIS SITI SAFARIJAH 16.NOTARIS SHELLA FALIANTI,SH 17.KEPALA BADAN KOORDINASI PENANAMAN MODAL REPUBLIK IDONESIA 18.MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAM REPUBLIK INDONESIA
6152761
  • (a) If any dispute or diference arises between the Parties inrespect of the intepretation of this agreement or of the rightsand liabilities of any Party or in respect of anything done oromited herein, such dispute or difference shall, so far aspossible, be decided amicably by the Parties acting in GoodFaith(6b) In the Event that such dispute or a difference cannot be sosettled within 90 (ninety) days from the time such dispute ordifference first arises between the Parties, such disputes orHalaman
    (c) Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, thearbitration tribunal shall consist of a single arbitrator.
    The award may apportion thecosts of the arbitration between the parties to arbitration.The decision of the arbitral tribunal shall be final and bindingon the Parties and enforceable in any court of competentjurisdiction.
    All disputes, controversies arising between the Parties outof or in relation to this Agreement including withoutlimitation any question relative to its interpretation,performance, validity, ectiveness and the termination of therights or oligations of any Party, shall be settled amicablyby the Parties wherever practicable. if such dispute cannotbe resolved amicably by the Parties after a period of 30(thirty) days after the receipt by one Party of a notice fromthe other Party of the existence of the
    ) without prejudice to the Parties' right to enforce anyarbitration award in any court having urisdiction overanother Party or its assets.During the period of submission to arbitration andthereafter until an award is granted, the Parties shallcontinue to pe~form all their respective oligations underHalaman 130 dari 275 hal.
Register : 05-08-2011 — Putus : 08-01-2013 — Upload : 14-07-2013
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.42554/PP/M.IX/19/2013
Tanggal 8 Januari 2013 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
12738
  • Wugu, Shiang, Taipei248, Taiwan R.O.C; Form E Nomor: E093201Z80441014 tanggal 22 Desember 2009 diterbitkan di NanjingJiangsu, China;bahwa berdasarkan Rules Of Origin For The ASEANChina Free Trade Area Annex 3 Ruler 1(a) menyebutkan a Party means the individual parties to the Agreement i.e.
Putus : 22-09-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 483/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 22 September 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT MOLTEN ALUMINUM PRODUCER INDONESIA
10471 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa berdasarkan Lampiran 3 A Surat Pemberitahuan (SPT)Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) Badan diketahui bahwa TermohonPeninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding) melakukansebagian transaksi penjualan dan pembelian dengan pihak yangmemiliki hubungan hubungan istimewa (Related Parties)denganfakta transaksi afiliasi berdasarkan laporan keuangan auditTermohon Peninjauan Kembali (Semula Pemohon Banding)tahun 2008 sebagai berikut:Halaman 20 dari 36 halaman Putusan Nomor 483/B/PK/PJK/201514.3.14.4.14.5.14.6.14.7
    Related Parties US$ 68.105.569Third Parties US$ 21.042.676Total US$ 89.148.245 Bahwa dalam penetapan harga transaksi dengan related parties,Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (Ssemula Pemohon Banding)menggunakan metode lain yakni harga berdasarkan LondonMetal Exchange ditambah biayabiaya dan profit.Bahwa Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali (Semula Terbanding)menitikberatkan koreksinya kepada transaksi penjualan yangdipengaruhi oleh hubungan istimewa (related parties) karena daridokumen berupa Faktur Pajak terdapat
Register : 14-02-2018 — Putus : 04-04-2018 — Upload : 26-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 117/PDT/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 4 April 2018 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT MEDIA NUSANTARA CITRA TBK
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Mr Ang Choon Beng@Ang Siong Kiat
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Linktone International Limited
Terbanding/Tergugat III : Linktone Ltd
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : Gordon Smith LLb (Hons) BE (Civil) FCIArb FSIArb FIEAust
Terbanding/Tergugat V : SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
415323
  • Bahwa pada tanggal 17 March 2010 Penggugat dengan Tergugat ,Tergugat Il, dan Tergugat III menandatangani Put and Call OptionAgreement (Put and Call Option Agreement") (vide bukti P1), dimanadalam Put and Call Option Agreement yang ditulis dalam bahasa Inggristersebut, Penggugat bersamasama dengan Tergugat II dan Tergugat III(yang dalam perjanjian tersebut secara bersamasama didefinisikansebagai Linktone Parties), memberikan Tergugat hak opsi untukmembeli secara keseluruhan dan tak terpisahpisah 150,000
    Relevant Linktone Party;(c) Subject to paragraphs (a) and (b) above, completion ofthesaleand purchase of the Initial Put Option Shares and theFurther PutOption Shares (Completion9 is to take placewithin 14 daysfrom the date that the Arbitral Tribunal issues itsdecision herein.at the office of the Claimants counsel, i.e.SGX Centre 2, #1701,4 Shenton Way, Singapore 068807, ata time to be specified by the Claimants counsel;(d) at completion, the Relevant Linktone Party shall, and theotherLinktone Parties
    SGX Centre2, #1701, 4 Shenton Way, Singapore068807, at a time to bespecified by the Claimants counsel;(d) at completion, the Relevant Linktone Party shall, and theother Linktone Parties shall procure that such RelevantLinktone Party deliver to Ang (the Claimant) a cashiersorder for the following sums:i. The Initial Put Option Consideration;ii. The Further Put Option Consideration;iii. All interest awarded by the Arbitral Tribunal in its decisionherein;iv.
    Inthe event the parties are unable to agree, parties are at liberty toapply.Teriemahan resminva adalah sebagai berikut:19.0 Putusan Parsial Ini655. Oleh karena itu, saya membuat dan menerbitkan Putusan Parsial inidan mengarahkanagar Pemohon dan Para Termohon menyelesaikanjual beli Saham Jual Perdana dan Saham Opsi Jual Lanjutan.20.0 Bunga dan Biaya656.
    SGX Centre 2, #1701, 4 Shenton Way,Singapore 068807, at a time to be specified by theClaimants counsel;at Completion, the Relevant Linktone Party shall, and theother Linktone Parties shall procure that such RelevantLinktone Party deliver to Ang (the Claimant) a cashiersorder for the following sums:i. the Initial Put Option Consideration;ii. the Further Put Option Consideration;ii. all interest awarded by the Arbitral Tribunal in itsdecision herein;iv. all costs awarded by the Arbitral Tribunal in
Putus : 10-06-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 170/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 10 Juni 2015 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. MOLTEN ALUMINUM PRODUCER INDONESIA
19571 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Sedangkanpenjualan yang dilakukan adalah menjual aluminium Alloy (ingot)dan menjual Yoto/Molten (aluminium cair);Bahwa berdasarkan Lampiran 3 A Surat Pemberitahuan (SPT)Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) Badan diketahui bahwa TermohonPeninjauan Kembali (Ssemula Pemohon Banding) melakukansebagian transaksi penjualan dan pembelian dengan pihak yangmemiliki hubungan istimewa (Related Parties) dengan faktatransaksi afiliasi berdasarkan laporan keuangan audit TermohonPeninjauan Kembali (Semula Pemohon Banding) tahun
    2008sebagai berikut: Related Parties US$ 68.105.569Third Parties US$ 21.042.676Total US$ 89.148.245 Bahwa dalam penetapan harga transaksi dengan related parties,Termohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula Pemohon Banding)menggunakan metode lain yakni harga berdasarkan London MetalExchange ditambah biayabiaya dan profit;Bahwa Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali (semula Terbanding)menitikberatkan koreksinya kepada transaksi penjualan yangdipengaruhi oleh hubungan istimewa (related parties) karena daridokumen berupa
Register : 16-02-2016 — Putus : 30-03-2016 — Upload : 27-06-2019
Putusan PA TEMBILAHAN Nomor 0128/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Tbh
Tanggal 30 Maret 2016 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
2533
  • Wacarktaties Parties Fercadion Acwea Terbleken anidmangiimian ssinan Pevetapan war Tab stelah har tlTemblahan dan Kanior Urata Agama Kecamaian Mandah,siediakan unt tusiah Rip, 814,000. iaheparscabon nates rhea roobe haakcins at Agar Tenibdahan A path har! Rabu eregel 2 30 Maret2018 Masehi bertepatan dengan tanggal 21 Jumadii Teani 1437 H, olehkami Dre. M. SYUKRI sebagai Hakim Ketua Majelia seria RIKIBERMAWAN, 5.H.1 dan FATHUR RIZG), 5.H. masingmasing sebagaiakin Ag a.