Ditemukan 319 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Putus : 09-03-2020 — Upload : 06-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 525/B/PK/Pjk/2020 Tanggal 9 Maret 2020 — PT QUEEN PACIFIC SUKSESABADI vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
72 — 38 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
72 — 38 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin , 4 single piece of material is used to form the sole andcither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the u shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 27-11-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 275 B/PK/PJK/2013 Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA;
79 — 80 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
79 — 80 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Relief or exemption in respect of an item of income is granted bythe State of source to a resident of the other Contracting State toavoid in whole or in part the double taxation that would otherwisearise from the concurrent taxation of that income by the State ofresidence.
Putus : 24-06-2014 — Upload : 15-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 572 PK/PDT/2013 Tanggal 24 Juni 2014 — SAID SYARIEF
Melawan
SAID ILYAS, dan kawan-kawan
Dan
TARMIZI, dan kawan-kawan
27 — 24 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
27 — 24 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Oleh karena itu pada keadaanseperti ini Ketua Majelis Peninjauan Kembalimempunyai justifikasi untuk dapat memeriksakembali proses persidangan dalam perkara iniuntuk mengkaji dan menguji kebenaran putusanperkara Nomor 3083 K/Pdt/2011 tanggal 24 April2012 tersebut;c Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system.The material recht will become een paperenmuur without the law enforcement. Therefore, weneed a accountable legal system to support theeffort of law enforcement.
Putus : 11-12-2019 — Upload : 20-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4236/B/PK/Pjk/2019 Tanggal 11 Desember 2019 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
37 — 14 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
37 — 14 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic monlded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the u per shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Putus : 02-05-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 168/B/PK/PJK/2016 Tanggal 2 Mei 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT ANAK TASIK,
275 — 82 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
275 — 82 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
In the determination of the profits of a permanent establishment, thereshall be allowed as deductions expenses which are incurred for thepurposes of the permanent establishment, including a reasonableallocation of executive and general administrative expenses incurred forthe purposes of the enterprise as a whole, whether in the ContractingState in which the permanent establishment is situated or elsewhere.4.
Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 19-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 509/B/PK/Pjk/2020 Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
59 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
59 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andcither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Putus : 13-05-2013 — Upload : 13-03-2014
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 06/PKPU/2013/PN.Niaga.Sby Tanggal 13 Mei 2013 — PT. BANK INTERNASIONAL INDONESIA Tbk
vs
PT. INTEGRA LESTARI,
884 — 357
884 — 357
SKTU.2013.026/DIR WHOLE SALECorporate Banking tanggal 16 April 2013, selanjutnya disebutSCDAQAL .0...eeeeeecececeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetetreeeeeeseeesees PP EMOHON PKPU ;TerhadapPT.
Register : 16-09-2019 — Putus : 29-10-2019 — Upload : 21-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4024 B/PK/PJK/2019 Tanggal 29 Oktober 2019 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
82 — 16 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
82 — 16 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the be shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Register : 15-01-2020 — Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 27-02-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 508 B/PK/PJK/2020 Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
80 — 60 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
80 — 60 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic megided: soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Register : 16-09-2019 — Putus : 28-10-2019 — Upload : 23-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4039 B/PK/PJK/2019 Tanggal 28 Oktober 2019 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
48 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
48 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded: soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Register : 07-08-2017 — Putus : 16-10-2017 — Upload : 03-11-2017
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 468/PDT/2017/PT.DKI. Tanggal 16 Oktober 2017 — PT.AGILENT RISK SPECIALTIES CS >< PT.ASURANSI TUGU KRESNA PRATAMA
155 — 70
155 — 70
(duaratus ribu dollar Amerika)10.Bahwa selain pembayaran yang telah dilakukan oleh Tergugat 11sebagaimana dimaksud diatas, PT Tugu Reasuransi Indonesia yangmerupakan perusahaan reasuradur yang ditunjuk oleh Terggugat Il,berdasarkan Surat No. 151/ DIRMAA/ XV 2014 tanggal 19 November2014 perihal Penyelesaian Klaim Recovery Whole Account of LossReisurance No. 06/ WAXL/ 2011 telah melakukan pembayaran klaimsesuai dengan porsinya secara langsung kepada Penggugat..Bahwa pembayaran oleh PT Tugu Reasuransi
Register : 20-03-2013 — Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 30-09-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 278 B/PK/PJK/2013 Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA;
60 — 40 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
60 — 40 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Relief or exemption in respect of an item of income is granted bythe State of source to a resident of the other Contracting State to avoidin whole or in part the double taxation that would otherwise arise fromthe concurrent taxation of that income by the State of residence.Halaman 23 dari 35 halaman.
Putus : 04-06-2013 — Upload : 27-04-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 386 PK/Pdt/2013 Tanggal 4 Juni 2013 — VERONICA WUSMAN, ; FARIS BADAR BALWEEL, DKK
105 — 77 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
105 — 77 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Oleh karena itu pada keadaanseperti ini Ketua Majelis Peninjauan Kembali mempunyai justifikasi untukdapat memeriksa kembali proses persidangan dalam perkara ini untukmengkaji dan menguji kebenaran putusan perkara Nomor 3083 K/ Pdt/2011tanggal 24 April 2012 tersebut;c Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system. The material recht willbecome een paperen muur without the law enforcement.
Putus : 25-03-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 860 /B/PK/PJK/2012 Tanggal 25 Maret 2013 — Direktur Jenderal Pajak vs PT. Tapian Nadenggan
37 — 40 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
37 — 40 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Relief or exemption inrespect of an item of income is granted by the State of source to a resident ofthe other Contracting State to avoid in whole or in part the double taxationthat would otherwise arise from the concurrent taxation of that income by theState of residence.
Putus : 24-09-2013 — Upload : 13-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 280 B/PK/PJK/2013 Tanggal 24 September 2013 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. EKAMAS FORTUNA
56 — 77 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
56 — 77 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Relief or exemption in respect of an item of income is grantedby the State of source to a resident of the other Contracting Stateto avoid in whole or in part the double taxation that wouldotherwise arise from the concurrent taxation of that income by theState of residence.
Putus : 21-03-2011 — Upload : 09-10-2012
Putusan PN CALANG Nomor 04/Pid.B/2011/PN-CAG Tanggal 21 Maret 2011 — JAMISAH Bin SULAIMAN
112 — 15
112 — 15
bahwa Hakim untuk setiap Tindak Pidana atau Kejahatan harusmemperhatikan keadaan objektif dan subjektif dari Tindak Pidana yang dilakukan danharus pula memperhatikan perbuatan dan pembuatnya, hakhak apa saja yang dilanggar dankerugian apa yang di timbulkan ;Menimbang, bahwa berdasarkan teori hukum modern, tujuan penjatuhan hukumandalam hukum pidana adalah untuk melindungi dan memelihara ketertiban hukum gunamempertahankan keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat sebagai satu kesatuan (for the publicas a whole
Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 08-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 428/B/PK/Pjk/2020 Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
283 — 65 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
283 — 65 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the w per shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Register : 08-02-2019 — Putus : 16-04-2019 — Upload : 29-04-2019
Putusan PN MAROS Nomor 27/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrs Tanggal 16 April 2019 — Penuntut Umum:
MUHAMMAD FAKHRY, SH.
Terdakwa:
RASYID ALIAS RASIDE BIN DG. ARASE
111 — 33
MUHAMMAD FAKHRY, SH.
Terdakwa:
RASYID ALIAS RASIDE BIN DG. ARASE
111 — 33
pengemban rasakeadilan hukum (Sense Of Justice), Majelis Hakim wajib mengikuti dan memahaminilai hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat, wajib mewujudkan secara konkrit melaluiputusan ini, apa yang menurut anggapannya sesuai dengan rasa keadilan hukummasyarakat (Social Justice) danberdasarkan teori hukum modern, tujuan penjatuhanhukuman dalam hukum pidana adalah untuk melindungi dan memelihara ketertibanhukum guna mempertahankan keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat sebagai satukesatuan (for the public as a whole
Putus : 28-08-2015 — Upload : 18-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 286 PK/Pdt/2015 Tanggal 28 Agustus 2015 — LILYANIE, DKK VS TENGKU TAHURA Ahli Waris TENGKU KAMALIAH, DKK
57 — 47 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
57 — 47 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system. The material recht willbecome een papiren muur without the law enforcement. Therefore, weneed an accounttable legal system a support the effort of law enforcement.Thus, a legal system must be independent and be supported by professionallawyers;(Penegakan hukum adalah bagian dari sistem hukum; Tanpa penegakhukum, maka kaidahkaidah hukum materiil niscaya menjadi tumpukankertas saja.
Register : 31-03-2015 — Putus : 05-05-2015 — Upload : 30-06-2015
Putusan PN PAYAKUMBUH Nomor 34/Pid.Sus/2015/PN PYH Tanggal 5 Mei 2015 — - SORANDA EKA PUTRA Panggilan SORANDA
60 — 17
60 — 17
dariTerdakwa dan keluarga koban sepakat untuk berdamai dan memaafkan segalaperbuatan Terdakwa;Menimbang, bahwapenjatuhan pemidanaan dewasa ini bukanlahmerupakan suatu usaha pembalasan terhadap pelaku karena telah melakukankejahatan yang mengakibatkan kesengsaraan bagi orang lain atau masyarakat,melainkan penjatuhan pemidanaan tersebut haruslah memiliki tujuan untukmelindungi dan memelihara ketertiban hukum guna mempertahankan keamanandan ketertiban masyarakat sebagai satu kesatuan (for the public as a whole