Ditemukan 70 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 22-10-2013 — Upload : 07-04-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 464 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2013
Tanggal 22 Oktober 2013 — HE SOK KHUI alias HELI SUSANTO VS ANDREAS STIHL AG & Co., KG
555331 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • pengetahuan umum masyaraksusaha yang bersangkutan;Mgnvensi Paris diratifikasi melaluiMomor 15 Tahun 1997 tentang Perubahanomor 24 Tahun 1979 mengenai PengesahanPerlindungan Kekayaan Industri (Parispasalpasal yang berkaitan denganPerlitQupgan Kekayaan Industrial, knususnya Merek terkenal:RLINDUNGAN TERHADAP MEREK TERKENALPasal 6 bis ayat (1) Konvensi Paris mengatur sebagai berikut:=The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation sopermits, or at the request of an interested party, to refuse
Putus : 11-08-2015 — Upload : 30-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 73 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
Tanggal 11 Agustus 2015 — FEBRIYANTO VS CRC INDUSTRIES, INC
477270 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Merek:Merek tidak dapat didaftar atas dasar permohonan yang diajukanPemohon yang beritikad tidak baik;Pasal 6 ayat 1 huruf b UU Merek:Permohonan harus ditolak oleh Direktorat Jenderal apabila merek tersebutmempunyai persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya dengan merekyang sudah terkenal milik pihak lain untuk barang dan/jasa sejenis;Kutipan Pasal 6 bis Konvensi Paris:The countries of the Union undertake, ex ofFicio if their legislation sopermits, or at the reguest of an interested party, to refuse
Putus : 18-03-2010 — Upload : 08-07-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 020PK/PDTSUS/2007
Tanggal 18 Maret 2010 — GS YUASA CORPORATION, ; PT. PARAHYANGAN PUTRA PRIBUMI,
134103 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Adapun ketentuan Pasal 6 bis ayat (1)Konvensi Paris menyebutkan:" The countnes of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation permits, or atthe request of interested party, to refuse or to cancel the registration, and soprohibit the use of a trademark which constitutes a reproduction, an imitation, ora translation, liable to create confusion of a mark considered by the competentauthority of the country of the registration or use to be well known in that countryas being already the mark of
Register : 03-10-2016 — Putus : 07-02-2017 — Upload : 25-05-2019
Putusan PA LUBUK PAKAM Nomor 1535/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Lpk
Tanggal 7 Februari 2017 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
2817
  • yang berbunyi sebagaiberikut : jika Suami atau isteri melalaikan kewajibannya masingmasing dapatmengajukan gugatan kepada pengadilan ;Menimbang, bahwa salah satu kewajiban suami terhadap isteri adalahmemberikan nafkah dan biaya rumah tangga sesuai dengan Pasal 80 ayat (4)Kompilasi Hukum Islam;Menimbang, bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 34 ayat (3) UndangUndangnomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Pasal 77 ayat (5) KompilasiHukum Islam tersebut di atas, maka kelalaian (neglect) atau penolakan (refuse
Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 02-05-2017
Putusan PN JEPARA Nomor 45/Pdt.G/2016/PN Jpa
Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 —
10158
  • Bilamana Nominated bank bertindak sesuai nominasinya,Confirming bank jika ada, atau Issuing bank menetapkan bahwaHalaman 23 dari 81 halaman, Putusan No.45/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jpapresentasi tidak sesuai, bank tersebut boleh menolak untukmembayar atau menegosiasiDiscrepant Documents , Waiver and Notice :a.When a nominated bank acting on its nomination, a confirming bank,if any, or the issuing bank determines that a presentation doesnot comply, it may refuse to honour or negotiateArticle/Pasal 16 huruf c.
    llLa :Cc.Bilamana Nominated bank bertindak sesuai nominasinya,Confirming bank jika ada, atau Issuing bank memutuskan untukmenolak untuk membayar atau menegoisasi, bank tersebut wajibmemberikan satu pemberitahuan untuk tujuan itu kepada presenter.Pemberitahuan tersebut wajib menyebutkan :lll. a) bahwa bank sedang menahan dokumendokumen menungguinstruksi lebih lanjutWhen a nominated bank acting on its nominationa, a confirmingbank, if any, or the issuing bank dicides to refuse to honour ornegotiate
Putus : 27-02-2012 — Upload : 12-06-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 728 K/Pdt.Sus/2011
Tanggal 27 Februari 2012 — ANNCO, INC. vs Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Cq. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Cq. Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Cq. Komisi Banding Merek
306236 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pada ketentuan Pasal 6b s dan Pasal 10 b 1 s KonvensiParis mengatur tentang:Pasal 6b 1s : "The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislationso permits, or at the request of an interested party, to refuse or to cancel theregistration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademark which constitutes areproduction, an imitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion, of a markconsidered by the competent authority of the country of registration or use to bewell known in that country
Register : 30-11-2018 — Putus : 05-09-2017 — Upload : 30-11-2018
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 169/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Tng
Tanggal 5 September 2017 — REGINA GOENAWAN, dkk Lawan PT. INDONESIA AIRASIA EXTRA, Cs
549546
  • MENGENAI HAK PENGANGKUT, IN CASU TERGUGAT UNTUK MENOLAKMENGANGKUT (RIGHT TO REFUSE CARRIAGE)44. Sebelum Tergugat menyampaikan bantahanbantahan dalam pokokperkara terhadap dialildalil yang diajukan Para Penggugat dalamGugatannya, perlu untuk Tergugat sampaikan terlebih dahulu mengenaiHal. 28 dari 61 Putusan Nomor169/Padt.G/2017/PN.
    Tng45.46.adanya dasar hukum bagi pengangkut in casu Tergugat untuk menolakmengangkut penumpang pesawat udara (right to refuse carriage).Ketentuan Pasal 54 UU Penerbangan telah mengatur tindakantindakanyang dilarang untuk dilakukan oleh setiap orang selama penerbangan didalam pesawat udara, yaitu sebagai berikut:a) perbuatan yang dapat membahayakan keamanan dankeselamatan penerbanganb) pelanggaran tata tertib dalam penerbangan;c) pengambilan atau pengrusakan peralatan pesawat udara yangdapat membahayakan
Putus : 23-02-2012 — Upload : 19-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 696 K/Pdt.Sus/2011
Tanggal 23 Februari 2012 — CBS INTERACTIVE INC vs LIE JONG WEI (JONG EWI RUSLI) DAN PEMERINTAH RI CQ. MENKUMHAM CQ. DIRJEN HAKI CQ. DIR. MEREK
139283 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 696 K/Pdt.Sus/201 1conclusion that there will be a confusion that is to say not necessarilythat one will be injured and that the other will gain illicit benefit, but thatthere will be a confusion in the mind of the public, which will lead toconfusion in the goods or services then you may refuse the registration,or rather you must refuse the registration in that case.";Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia:"Anda harus membandingkan kedua merek tersebut.
Upload : 13-05-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 20 PK/PDT.SUS/2007
GS. YUASA CORPORATION; PT. PARAHYANGAN PUTRA PRIBUMI
7364 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Adapun ketentuan Pasal 6 bisayat (1) Konvensi Paris menyebutkan:"The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if theirlegislation permits, or atthe request of interested party, to refuse or to cancel theregistration, and soprohibit the use of a trademark which constitutes aHal. 8 dari 22 hal. Put.
Putus : 25-04-2017 — Upload : 20-06-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 57 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017
Tanggal 25 April 2017 — GS YUASA CORPORATION VS 1. LUSY DARMAWATI WALUYO, DKK
372382 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Adapun ketentuanPasal 6 bis ayat (1) Konvensi Paris menyebutkan:The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation permits,or at the request of interested party, to refuse or to cancel the registration,and so prohibit the use of a trademark which constitutes a reproduction, animitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion of a mark consideredby the competent authority of the country of the registration or use to bewell known in that country as being already the mark of
    Nomor 57 PK/Pdt.SusHKI/201713.14.or services then you may refuse the registration, or rather you must refusethe registration in that case;Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia:Anda harus membandingkan kedua merek tersebut. Anda harus menilaikeduanya menurut penampilannya dan suaranya. Anda harusmempertimbangkan barang dan jasa untuk mana merekmerek tersebutakan digunakan.
Putus : 20-07-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 572/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 20 Juli 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDONESIA
127129 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The Company also provides vantypecarrier vehicles, vans, storehouse vehicles, tank trucks andcompression refuse carrier vehicles, among others,3 CHINAAVIC AVIONICS 3711 Motor vehicles The Company is principally engaged in the production and 405,077) 60,883) 15.03%EQUIPMENT CO,, LTD. and passenger sale of automobiles and automobile parts.car bodies4 CHINA MOTOR 3711 Motorvehicles The Company's principal activities are manufacturing and 1,672,127 343,834 20.56%CORPORATION and passenger selling of various
    The Company also provides vanypecarrier vehicles, vans, storehouse vehicles, tank trucks andcompression refuse carrier vehicles, among others, 3 CHINAAVIC AVIONICS 3711 Motorvehicles The Company is principally engaged in the production and 405,077) 60,883 15.03% EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. and passenger sale of automobiles and automobile parts,car bodies4 CHINA MOTOR 3711 Motorvehicles The Company's principal activities are manufacturing and 1,672,127 343,831) 20.56%CORPORATION and passenger seling of various
Register : 01-03-2016 — Putus : 08-06-2016 — Upload : 10-06-2016
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 158/PDT/2016/PT.DKI
Tanggal 8 Juni 2016 — PT.SRI REJEKI PERDANA STEEL >< HYUNDAI CORPORATION CS
335203
  • Confirmation on theRespondent's liability for breach of contract): Therefore, the ArbitrationTribunal deems that the Respondent should undertake the liability forbreach to refuse to issue the letter of credit." Terjemahan resmi dantersumpah Putusan Arbitrase Internasional (Il. Opini = dariPengadilan Arbitrase, (VII) Tanggung jawab Responden ataspelanggaran kontrak, 1.
Putus : 18-06-2015 — Upload : 15-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 329 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
Tanggal 18 Juni 2015 — EXEL RIM SDN DHD VS PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA C.Q. KEMENTERIAN HUKUM dan HAK ASASI MANUSIA C.Q. DIREKTORAT JENDERAL HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL C.Q. KOMISI BANDING MEREK
221169 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pada ketentuan Pasal 6 bis dan Pasal 10 bis Konvensi Parismengatur tentang:Pasal 6 bisPasal 10 bis: "The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if theirlegislation so permits, or at the request of an interestedparty, to refuse or to cancel the registration, and to prohibitthe use, of a trademark which constitutes a reproduction, animitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion, of amark considered by the competent authority of the countryof registration or use to be well known in that
Register : 18-09-2015 — Putus : 18-11-2015 — Upload : 18-12-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 57/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2014/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST
Tanggal 18 Nopember 2015 — EXEL RIM SDN BHD. >< KOMISI BANDING MEREK
313131
  • Pada ketentuan Pasal 6 bis dan Pasal 10 bis KonvensiParis mengatur tentangPasal 6 bis : "The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation so permits, or at the request ofan interested party, to refuse or to cancel the registration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademarkwhich constitutes a reproduction, an imitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion, of amark considered by the competent authority of the country of registration or use to be wellknown in that country
Register : 15-05-2019 — Putus : 13-08-2019 — Upload : 19-08-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 294/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 13 Agustus 2019 — Pembanding/Terbanding/Tergugat III : Bank DBS SINGAPURA,
Terbanding/Pembanding/Penggugat I : Mercury Overseas Finance LTD
Terbanding/Pembanding/Penggugat II : PT. Dabi Oleo
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Wuxi Humei Thermal Energy and Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd,
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WUXI BOILER POWER PLANT INDONESIA
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : China Construction Bank Corporation
202142
  • Selanjutnya Pasal 16 butir tii huruf c dan d menyebutkan sebagaiberikut:When nominated bank acting on its nomination, a confirming bank, ifany, or the issuing bank decides to refuse to honour or negotiate, itmust give a Single notice to that effect to the presenter.c) that the bank is returning the documents; ord) that the bank is acting in accordance with instructions previouslyreceived from the presenter.Terjemahan :Pada saat Bank yang dinominasikan bertindak untuk dan atas namanominasi nya, a
Register : 18-09-2014 — Putus : 18-11-2014 — Upload : 28-04-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 57/PDT.SUS-MEREK/2014/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST
Tanggal 18 Nopember 2014 — EXEL RIM SDN BHD >< PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA Ca KEMENTERIAN HUKUM dan HAK ASASI MANUSIA Cq DIREKTORAT JENDERAL HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL Cq KOMISI BANDING MEREK
17579
  • Pada ketentuan Pasal 6 bis dan Pasal 10 bis KonvensiParis mengatur tentangPasal 6 bis : "The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation so permits, or at the request ofan interested party, to refuse or to cancel the registration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademarkwhich constitutes a reproduction, an imitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion, of amark considered by the competent authority of the country of registration or use to be wellknown in that country
Putus : 27-07-2012 — Upload : 22-03-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 177 PK/Pdt/2012
Tanggal 27 Juli 2012 — PT. TRITON ONE INDONESIA, dk vs. PT. BANK NIAGA Tbk
138182 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • meneruskanpembayaran saja melainkan juga melakukan pemeriksaan dokumen, bila terjadipenyimpanganpenyimpangan terhadap dokumen L/C sebagaimana hal inidiatur dalam ketentuan UCP 500;Bahwa dalam pasal 13 huruf b UCP 500 disebutkan sebagai berikut:The Issuing Bank, the Confirming Bank, if any, or a Nominated Bank acting ontheir behaft, shall each have a reasonable time, not to exceed seven bankingdays following the day of receipt of the documents, to examine the documentsand determine whether to take up or refuse
Putus : 19-10-2017 — Upload : 21-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 136 PK/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2017
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2017 — YUDHI TANTO, VS GS YUASA CORPORATION, DK
369157 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • kriteria dari Undang Undang Merek sebagaimanadisebutkan dalam Penjelasan dari Pasal 6 ayat (1) huruf (b) mengenaimerek terkenal dan pedoman WIPO untuk merek terkenal;Bahwa Pasal 6 dari Konvensi Paris menyatakan bahwa negaranegaraanggota harus menolak atau membatalkan pendaftaran merek yangmerupakan reproduksi atau imitasi dari suatu merek terkenal, denganmenyatakan bahwa:"The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation sopermits, or at the request of an interested party, to refuse
Putus : 25-08-2014 — Upload : 29-10-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 85 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014
Tanggal 25 Agustus 2014 — GS YUASA CORPORATION VS LUSY DARMAWATI WALUYO, DK
294559 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Adapun ketentuanPasal 6 bis ayat (1) Konvensi Paris menyebutkan:"The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation permits,or at the request of interested party, to refuse or to cancel the registration,and so prohibit the use of a trademark which constitutes a reproduction, animitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion of a mark consideredby the competent authority of the country of the registration or use to bewell known in that country as being already the mark of
Register : 18-10-2016 — Putus : 18-04-2017 — Upload : 25-04-2019
Putusan PN TANGERANG Nomor 757/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Tng.
Tanggal 18 April 2017 —
12451
  • We reserve the right to refuse carriage to any Passenger who has notcomplied with, or whose documents do not appear to comply with, such applicable laws, regulations, orders, demands or requirements6.6 Documents AdvisoryDomestic Routes: Adults are required to produce their original identity cards* or passports for all domestic flights.