Ditemukan 484 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : tose taone theos thoon tosen thole these thome taose thoce thone thosen thoso
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 23-10-2015 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1241 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 23 Oktober 2015 — BUPATI KEPALA DAERAH TINGKAT II TANGERANG VS Ahli waris A. ROJANI, Almarhum yaitu: IS ABDUL ROSYID, DKK
83 — 54 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Corruption also occurs wheninstead of proceedings being determined on the basis of evidence and the law,their outcome is affected by improper influences, inducements pressures,threats, or interference, directly or indirectly, from any quarter or for any reasonincluding those ansing from: a conflict of interest, nepotism, favoritism tofriends, or a particular association or institution, consideration of post retirementplacements, improper socialization with members of the legal profession, theexecutive
Pengadilan PN DENPASAR Perdata
Register : 28-11-2019 — Putus : 30-06-2021 — Upload : 06-07-2021
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 1200/Pdt.Bth/2019/PN Dps
Tanggal 30 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
Ratna Widia Kurniawati
Tergugat:
1.John Carney
2.Christopher Rhode
3.Doug Ebner
4.PT Bintang Selatan
Turut Tergugat:
1.Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang KPKNL Denpasar
2.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Badung
3.Mark Damien Clune
4.KANTOR PELAYANAN KEKAYAAN NEGARA DAN LELANG (KPKNL)
5.BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KABUPATEN BADUNG
341 — 248
  • Cassation Case No.1871 K / PDT / 2016 dated which hasbeen was decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia onOctober 17, 2016 at point 4th of the Decision "In the Principal Case of theCase which contains the following: to order Defendant and Defendant IIto pay back the money they had received to the Plaintiffs of US $195,000.00 (one hundred ninety five thousand US Dollars);Coupled with an interest rate of 6% (Six percent) a year starting April 5,2007 until payment to the Plaintiff", then those
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Putus : 26-09-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1343 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 26 September 2013 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK Melawan PT NUBIKA JAYA
190 — 148 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • It is fordiscussion purposes only and does not constitute any offer,recommendation or solicitation to any person to enter into anytransaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, nordoes it constitute any prediction of likely future movements in rates orprices or any representation that any such future movements wil notexceed those shown in any illustration. The terms of any transactionentered into will be recorded in a witten confirmation or otherHal 40 dari 60 hal.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA BARAT Perdata
Register : 29-07-2020 — Putus : 17-11-2020 — Upload : 01-12-2020
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 506/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Brt
Tanggal 17 Nopember 2020 — Penggugat:
PT Gerrindo Surya Makmur
Tergugat:
PT Asuransi Central Asia
474 — 132
  • (E) Dari pertanyaan pertanyaan berikut yang hanya harus dijawab ialah yangbersangkutpaut dengan kecelakaan itu atau mungkin penting untuk bahanpertimbangan lebih lanjut /Of the following questions only those have to beanswered which have something to doAdakah alasan (dan jikalau ada alasan apa) untuk memperkirakan bahwa yangharus dipersalahkan dalam hal ini sebagian atau seluruhnya kecelakaan adalahakibat konstruksi atau tata susunan kapal/ Is there any reason (and if so why) toconsider that the
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pidana Khusus
Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 18-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2033 K/PID.SUS/2017
Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — Suharto,A.Md.RO A.Md Kep.S.KM
207 — 133 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Artinya, Terdakwa bekerja mempunyai AtasanLangsung dan berada dibawah pengawasan Kepala institusinya.Dalam pengaturan tata kerjanya, Perawat bekerja di bawah payunghukum UndangUndang Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 Tentang Keperawatan (/exspecialis).Dalam praktik keperawatan, fungsi Perawat diantaranya yakni,pertama, fungsi independent, adalah those activities that are considered tobe within nursings scope of diagnoses and treatment.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 21-03-2017 — Putus : 14-06-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 589 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 14 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
42 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The general words are to be restricted to things of thesame class as those which are spesified.Halaman 28 dari 71 halaman.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 29-06-2021 — Putus : 23-08-2021 — Upload : 30-11-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 305/PDT/2021/PT DKI
Tanggal 23 Agustus 2021 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. GENESA DIRGANTARA, Diwakili Oleh : PT. GENESA DIRGANTARA,
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. ASURANSI WAHANA TATA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WILLIS INDONESIA
263 — 186
  • Hanafie tidak termasuk dalam definisiInstruktur Sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Bagian 4 Bagan Polis.Penggunaan Illegal:Whilst the Aircraft is being used for any illegal purpose or for anypurpose other than those stated in Part 3 of the Schedule and asdefined in the Definitions.Dalam terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:Pada saat Pesawat sedang digunakan untuk tujuan illegal atau tujuanselain dari yang tercantum dalam Bagian 3 Bagan Polis dansebagaimana didefinisikan dalam Definisi.Hal. 17 dari hal 61 Putusan
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 03-11-2014 — Putus : 11-02-2015 — Upload : 31-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1015 B/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 11 Februari 2015 — PT. AMERO MITRA FILM vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
137 — 195 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Given the unique situation with regard to data or instructions (software)recorded on carrier media for data processing equipment, and thatsome Parties have sought a different approach, it would also beconsistent with the Agreement for those Parties which wish to do so toadopt the following practice:In determining the Customs value of imported carrier media bearing dataor instructions, only the cost or value of the carrier medium itself shall betaken into account.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 12-09-2017 — Upload : 16-01-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 972 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017
Tanggal 12 September 2017 — LIE SENIHIAN VS MATSUNAGA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD
560 — 473 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • lanjut denganPeraturan Pemerintah;Demikian pula hal tersebut diatur dalam Article 16.3 Agreement on TradeRelated Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) juncto Article 6 bisParis Convention yang telah diratifikasi oleh Indonesia melalui Undangundang Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengesahan Pembentukan OrganisasiPerdagangan Dunia (World Trade Organization/WTO), yang menyatakan:Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention (1967) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, togoods or services which are not similarto those
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-03-2017 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 276 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT. INDOCEMENT TUNGGA PRAKARSA, TBK
51 — 28 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which are specified.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle;Halaman 30 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 276/B/PK/PJK/2017This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another;Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asas dalamContextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis;;Suatu hal diketahui
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata Khusus Paten
Register : 10-12-2018 — Putus : 15-05-2019 — Upload : 22-07-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 61/Pdt.Sus-Paten/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 15 Mei 2019 — PT. LINTAS PROMOSI GLOBAL, Cs >< PT. KARTA INDONESIA GLOBAL, Cs
2036 — 1858
  • For purposes of administrative hearing,are those who have a legally recognized private interest, and not simplya possible pecuniary benefit, yang diartikan Pihak YangBerkepentingan: Untuk dengar pendapat administratif, pihakberkepentingan adalah mereka yang memiliki kepentingan pribadi yangdiakui secara hukum, tidak hanya sekedar tentang keuntungan finansialyang mungkin didapat.
Pengadilan PT BANTEN Perdata
Upload : 28-10-2016
Putusan PT BANTEN Nomor 114/PDT/2016/PT BTN
PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, berkedudukan di Korea Center Lt. 4 Suite 405, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 58, Jakarta Selatan, dalm hal ini diwakili oleh kuasanya M. LUTHFIE HAKIM, S.H., M.H., RUSDIANTO, MATULATUWA, S.H., ANITA ZIZLAVSKY, S.H., FERDINAND ROBOT, S.H., M.H., WAHYU BUDI WIBOWO, S.H., JUNIARTI, S.H., dan FANI KUMALA SARI, S.H., Para Advokat dan Konsultan Hukum pada M. LUTHFIE HAKIM & PARTNERS Law Firm, beralamat di Graha Pratama Lt. 20, Jl. MT. Haryono Kav. 15, Jakarta 12810, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 14 April 2016, selanjutnya disebut sebagai PEMBANDING semula TERGUGAT I; MELAWAN 1. PT. IGAS UTAMA, berkedudukan di Plaza 3 Pondok Indah Blok E No. 9, Jl. TB. Simatupang, Jakarta Selatan, dalam hal ini diwakili oleh kuasanya H. ARI WAHYUDI HERTANTO, S.H., M.H., SUGIH HARTONO, S.H., M.H., DANANG WS MARTOSRIWARDOYO, S.H., dan H. HUDI MASHUDI, S.H., Para Advokat dan Konsultan Hukum dari Kantor Hukum WAHYUDI, HARTONO & PARTNER, beralamat di Talavera Office Suite 18th Floor, Jl. TB. Simatupang Kav. 22-26 Jakarta, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 1 Juni 2015, selanjutnya disebut sebagai TERBANDING I semula PENGGUGAT; 2. PT. BANTEN INTI GASINDO, berkedudukan di Kompleks Arga Baja Pura B D-9/17-A Gerogol, Pulo Merak, Cilegon-Banten, yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai TERBANDING II semula TERGUGAT
180 — 241
  • Statements of case which are suitable fro striking outon ground (a) include those which raise an unwinnable case wherecontinuance of the proceedings is without any possible benefit to therespondent and would waste resources on both sides (Harris v. BoltBurden 2000 L.T.L., February 2, 2000,CA). A claim or defence may bestruct out as not being a valid claim or defence as a matter of law (PriceMeats Ltd. v.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pajak Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 26PPh26
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1827 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
267 — 128 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Contracting State, having apermanent establishment in the other Contracting State, derivesprofits through that permanent establishment, such profits may betaxed (in addition to the tax which would be chargeable on thoseprofits if they were the profits of a company which was a resident ofthat other Contracting State) in accordance with the laws of the otherContracting State but the rate of tax so imposed shall not exceed10% of the profits of the permanent establishment after payment ofthe income tax on those
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 19-10-2017 — Upload : 14-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1460 K/Pdt/2017
Tanggal 19 Oktober 2017 — PT. IGAS UTAMA VS PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, dk
369 — 274 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Statements of case which are suitable fro strikingout on ground (a) include those which raise an unwinnable case wherecontinuance of the proceedings is without any possible benefit to therespondent and would waste resources on both sides (Harris v. BoltBurden 2000 L.T.L., February 2, 2000,CA). A claim or defence may bestruct out as not being a valid claim or defence as a matter of law (PriceMeats Ltd. v.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Putus : 25-01-2017 — Upload : 04-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 62 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017
Tanggal 25 Januari 2017 — PT REPUBLIK ENERGI & METAL VS ZAINAL ABIDINSYAH SIREGAR
813 — 604 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The Borrower agreesfor the benefit of the Lender that the English courts will have nonexclusiveJurisdiction to settle any dispute including a dispute relating to noncontractual obligations arising out of or in connection with this Agreementand for these purposes submits to the jurisdiction of those courts";Terjemahan resmi:"Perjanjian ini dan setiap kewajibankewajiban nonkontraktual yangtimbul dari atau sehubungan dengan Perjanjian ini akan diaturberdasarkan hukum Inggris.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Hak Uji Materiil
Register : 07-04-2016 — Putus : 05-10-2016 — Upload : 01-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 16 P/HUM/2016
Tanggal 5 Oktober 2016 — M. H. PANJAITAN., DKK VS MENTERI PERINDUSTRIAN RI;
251 — 153 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant toachieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary for:(a) The provision for the reduction of the still birthrate and of infantmortality and for the healthy development of the child;(6) The improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrialhygiene;(c) The prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic,occupational and other diseases;(d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Register : 21-01-2019 — Putus : 16-05-2019 — Upload : 20-07-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 45/Pdt.G.Arbit/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 16 Mei 2019 — SEKRETARIS KEMENTERIAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL / SEKRETARIS UTAMA BADAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL SELAKU KUASA PENGGUNA ANGGARAN SATUAN KERJA PENGELOLA HIBAH MCC X PT. CARBONTROPIC ,Cs
1572 — 672
  • At a minimum DisbursementRequest must be accompanied by:(i) Supporting document or other proof sufficient to provideevidence, to MCAI/ndonesias satisfaction, ofcompletion of each required delivareable(s), includingthose funded using partnership contributions;(ii) Grant Fund Accountability Statement which presents theactual cost incurred by the Implementer, including abreakdown of those representing agreed uponpartnership contributions and those requested forreimbursement by MCAIndonesia;(iii) Expenditure
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1832/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
121 — 75 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Contracting State, having apermanent establishment in the other Contracting State, derivesprofits through that permanent establishment, such profits may betaxed (in addition to the tax which would be chargeable on thoseprofits if they were the profits of a company which was a resident ofthat other Contracting State) in accordance with the laws of the otherContracting State but the rate of tax so imposed shall not exceed10% of the profits of the permanent establishment after payment ofthe income tax on those
Pengadilan PT SEMARANG Perdata
Register : 15-07-2019 — Putus : 07-08-2019 — Upload : 09-08-2019
Putusan PT SEMARANG Nomor 385/PDT/2019/PT SMG
Tanggal 7 Agustus 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat I : Ngabedan Diwakili Oleh : Ngabedan
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Kepala Koperasi Unit Desa KUD Sri Waluyaning Tani
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Kepala Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kebumen
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat II : Towiyah
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat III : Yugi Woro Ariyani
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat IV : Yoga Wahyu Sasono
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat V : Irwan Danu Cahyana
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat VI : Suparno
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat VII : Sulastri
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat VIII : Muntiani
Turut Terbanding/Penggugat IX : Achmad Sudono
193 — 132
  • Construction implementation service shall provide implementationservice in construction works or parts of those activities starts frompreparation of a field through final submission of the constructionwork." Construction supervision business shall provide service insupervising both the whole or part of the implementation ofconstruction works, starts from preparation of a field through finalsubmission of construction result."
Pengadilan PN CILACAP
Register : 12-06-2012 — Putus : 03-04-2013 — Upload : 27-04-2014
Putusan PN CILACAP Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2012/PN Clp
Tanggal 3 April 2013 —
375 — 171
  • ., in his book titled Hukum Perjanjian 12 Edition, Publishedby Intermasa, Jakarta, 1963 page 45 stating as follows:Default of a debtor may be divided into four categories:a failure to perform whatever he or she is able to do;b performance of obligations as promised but the result thereof isdifferent from those promised;c delayed performance of obligations;d performance of something unpermitted under an agreement24 Whereas from the abovementioned explanations, it is clear that Defendantsare in default