Ditemukan 494 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Putus : 10-12-2013 — Upload : 12-08-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2364 K/Pdt/2013 Tanggal 10 Desember 2013 —
46 — 45 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
46 — 45 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Pemohon Kasasimemohon perlakuan yang sama dalam situasi yang sama ataskasus yang sama (equal treatment of those similarly situated or similar cases);Hakim dalam memikulkan pembebanan pembuktian harus bersikap:e Adil, sesuai prinsip fair trial, dane Tidak berat sebelah atau tidak bersikap parsial, tetapi imparsialitas;Hakim tidak boleh merugikan kepentingan salah satu pihak, tetapi secarabijaksana membaginya sesuai dengan sistem hukum pembuktian dengancara memberi perhitungan yang sama kepada pihak
Putus : 17-05-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 596/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 17 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT. MONAGRO KIMIA
30 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
30 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespecified;The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle;This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another,Bahwa pada intinya, lan Mc Leod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis;Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Putus : 29-03-2016 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3614 K/PDT/2015 Tanggal 29 Maret 2016 — BUPATI KEPALA DAERAH TINGKAT II KABUPATEN
TANGERANG DKK VS SARMANAH binti H. SAKRIM DKK
55 — 24 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
55 — 24 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Corruptionalso occurs when instead of proceedings being determined on the basis ofevidence and the law, their outcome is affected by improper influences,inducements pressures, threats, or interference, directly or indirectly, fromany quarter or for any reason including those arising from : a conflict ofinterest, nepotism, favouritism to friends, or a particular association orinstitution, consideration of post retirement placements, impropersocialisation with members of the legal profession, the executive
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 20-04-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 456 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 20 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
34 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
34 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesitied.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociisSuatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Putus : 23-10-2015 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1241 K/Pdt/2015 Tanggal 23 Oktober 2015 — BUPATI KEPALA DAERAH TINGKAT II TANGERANG
VS
Ahli waris A. ROJANI, Almarhum yaitu:
IS ABDUL ROSYID, DKK
66 — 43 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
66 — 43 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Corruption also occurs wheninstead of proceedings being determined on the basis of evidence and the law,their outcome is affected by improper influences, inducements pressures,threats, or interference, directly or indirectly, from any quarter or for any reasonincluding those ansing from: a conflict of interest, nepotism, favoritism tofriends, or a particular association or institution, consideration of post retirementplacements, improper socialization with members of the legal profession, theexecutive
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 12-04-2017 — Upload : 13-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 464 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 12 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
27 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
27 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified;The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle:This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another;Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis:Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Putus : 26-03-2013 — Upload : 06-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 877 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 Tanggal 26 Maret 2013 — ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, dkk ; PT. AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, dkk
1339 — 1100 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
1339 — 1100 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Having regard to the fact that the Claimants have wholly or largely succeeded ateach stage of the reference, the Tribunal conclude that the Respondents should paythe whole of the costs of the arbitration.Legal costs17.Rule 31.1 provides that the tribunal shall have the authority to order in its awardthat all or part of the legal or other costs of a party (apart form the costs of thearbitration) be paid by the other party As before the Tribunal considers that itshould assess those costs now than refer
Putus : 08-06-2017 — Upload : 18-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 474/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 8 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT MONAGRO KIMIA
35 — 31 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
35 — 31 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesitied.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeodmengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociisSuatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 20-04-2017 — Upload : 10-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 462 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 20 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
37 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
37 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociisSuatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Register : 21-07-2017 — Putus : 29-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1462 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MITSUBA INDONESIA;
41 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
41 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas Noscitur A Sociis;Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 18-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2033 K/PID.SUS/2017 Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — Suharto,A.Md.RO A.Md Kep.S.KM
158 — 100 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
158 — 100 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Artinya, Terdakwa bekerja mempunyai AtasanLangsung dan berada dibawah pengawasan Kepala institusinya.Dalam pengaturan tata kerjanya, Perawat bekerja di bawah payunghukum UndangUndang Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 Tentang Keperawatan (/exspecialis).Dalam praktik keperawatan, fungsi Perawat diantaranya yakni,pertama, fungsi independent, adalah those activities that are considered tobe within nursings scope of diagnoses and treatment.
Register : 28-11-2019 — Putus : 30-06-2021 — Upload : 06-07-2021
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 1200/Pdt.Bth/2019/PN Dps Tanggal 30 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
Ratna Widia Kurniawati
Tergugat:
1.John Carney
2.Christopher Rhode
3.Doug Ebner
4.PT Bintang Selatan
Turut Tergugat:
1.Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang KPKNL Denpasar
2.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Badung
3.Mark Damien Clune
4.KANTOR PELAYANAN KEKAYAAN NEGARA DAN LELANG (KPKNL)
5.BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KABUPATEN BADUNG
232 — 155
Ratna Widia Kurniawati
Tergugat:
1.John Carney
2.Christopher Rhode
3.Doug Ebner
4.PT Bintang Selatan
Turut Tergugat:
1.Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang KPKNL Denpasar
2.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Badung
3.Mark Damien Clune
4.KANTOR PELAYANAN KEKAYAAN NEGARA DAN LELANG (KPKNL)
5.BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KABUPATEN BADUNG
232 — 155
Cassation Case No.1871 K / PDT / 2016 dated which hasbeen was decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia onOctober 17, 2016 at point 4th of the Decision "In the Principal Case of theCase which contains the following: to order Defendant and Defendant IIto pay back the money they had received to the Plaintiffs of US $195,000.00 (one hundred ninety five thousand US Dollars);Coupled with an interest rate of 6% (Six percent) a year starting April 5,2007 until payment to the Plaintiff", then those
Putus : 26-09-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1343 K/Pdt/2013 Tanggal 26 September 2013 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
Melawan
PT NUBIKA JAYA
157 — 116 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
157 — 116 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
It is fordiscussion purposes only and does not constitute any offer,recommendation or solicitation to any person to enter into anytransaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, nordoes it constitute any prediction of likely future movements in rates orprices or any representation that any such future movements wil notexceed those shown in any illustration. The terms of any transactionentered into will be recorded in a witten confirmation or otherHal 40 dari 60 hal.
Register : 29-06-2021 — Putus : 23-08-2021 — Upload : 30-11-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 305/PDT/2021/PT DKI Tanggal 23 Agustus 2021 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. GENESA DIRGANTARA, Diwakili Oleh : PT. GENESA DIRGANTARA,
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. ASURANSI WAHANA TATA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WILLIS INDONESIA
185 — 129
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. ASURANSI WAHANA TATA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WILLIS INDONESIA
185 — 129
Hanafie tidak termasuk dalam definisiInstruktur Sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Bagian 4 Bagan Polis.Penggunaan Illegal:Whilst the Aircraft is being used for any illegal purpose or for anypurpose other than those stated in Part 3 of the Schedule and asdefined in the Definitions.Dalam terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:Pada saat Pesawat sedang digunakan untuk tujuan illegal atau tujuanselain dari yang tercantum dalam Bagian 3 Bagan Polis dansebagaimana didefinisikan dalam Definisi.Hal. 17 dari hal 61 Putusan
Register : 03-11-2014 — Putus : 11-02-2015 — Upload : 31-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1015 B/PK/PJK/2014 Tanggal 11 Februari 2015 — PT. AMERO MITRA FILM vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
98 — 162 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
98 — 162 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Given the unique situation with regard to data or instructions (software)recorded on carrier media for data processing equipment, and thatsome Parties have sought a different approach, it would also beconsistent with the Agreement for those Parties which wish to do so toadopt the following practice:In determining the Customs value of imported carrier media bearing dataor instructions, only the cost or value of the carrier medium itself shall betaken into account.
Register : 29-07-2020 — Putus : 17-11-2020 — Upload : 01-12-2020
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 506/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Brt Tanggal 17 Nopember 2020 — Penggugat:
PT Gerrindo Surya Makmur
Tergugat:
PT Asuransi Central Asia
372 — 132
PT Gerrindo Surya Makmur
Tergugat:
PT Asuransi Central Asia
372 — 132
(E) Dari pertanyaan pertanyaan berikut yang hanya harus dijawab ialah yangbersangkutpaut dengan kecelakaan itu atau mungkin penting untuk bahanpertimbangan lebih lanjut /Of the following questions only those have to beanswered which have something to doAdakah alasan (dan jikalau ada alasan apa) untuk memperkirakan bahwa yangharus dipersalahkan dalam hal ini sebagian atau seluruhnya kecelakaan adalahakibat konstruksi atau tata susunan kapal/ Is there any reason (and if so why) toconsider that the
Putus : 08-03-2017 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 276 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 8 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT. INDOCEMENT TUNGGA PRAKARSA, TBK
41 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
41 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which are specified.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle;Halaman 30 dari 68 halaman Putusan Nomor 276/B/PK/PJK/2017This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another;Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asas dalamContextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis;;Suatu hal diketahui
Putus : 12-09-2017 — Upload : 16-01-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 972 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017 Tanggal 12 September 2017 — LIE SENIHIAN VS MATSUNAGA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD
503 — 371 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
503 — 371 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
lanjut denganPeraturan Pemerintah;Demikian pula hal tersebut diatur dalam Article 16.3 Agreement on TradeRelated Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) juncto Article 6 bisParis Convention yang telah diratifikasi oleh Indonesia melalui Undangundang Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengesahan Pembentukan OrganisasiPerdagangan Dunia (World Trade Organization/WTO), yang menyatakan:Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention (1967) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, togoods or services which are not similarto those
Putus : 19-10-2017 — Upload : 14-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1460 K/Pdt/2017 Tanggal 19 Oktober 2017 — PT. IGAS UTAMA VS PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, dk
309 — 214 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
309 — 214 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Statements of case which are suitable fro strikingout on ground (a) include those which raise an unwinnable case wherecontinuance of the proceedings is without any possible benefit to therespondent and would waste resources on both sides (Harris v. BoltBurden 2000 L.T.L., February 2, 2000,CA). A claim or defence may bestruct out as not being a valid claim or defence as a matter of law (PriceMeats Ltd. v.
Register : 10-12-2018 — Putus : 15-05-2019 — Upload : 22-07-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 61/Pdt.Sus-Paten/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst Tanggal 15 Mei 2019 — PT. LINTAS PROMOSI GLOBAL, Cs >< PT. KARTA INDONESIA GLOBAL, Cs
1770 — 1858
1770 — 1858
For purposes of administrative hearing,are those who have a legally recognized private interest, and not simplya possible pecuniary benefit, yang diartikan Pihak YangBerkepentingan: Untuk dengar pendapat administratif, pihakberkepentingan adalah mereka yang memiliki kepentingan pribadi yangdiakui secara hukum, tidak hanya sekedar tentang keuntungan finansialyang mungkin didapat.